The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutS-0743 Staff AnalysisSUBDIVISION DATE /D lz�5 Q� ITEM NO. FILE NO. NAME: �12 •tam l�4 �� vr�sed LOCATION: kla DEVELOPER ENGINEER NAME: STREET ADDRESS CITY/STATE/ZIP ri�i�C �� ZZ E 7zll� TELEPHONE NO. AREA , r� NUMBER OF LOTS FT. NEW STREET ZONING C! Z PLANNING DISTRICT PROPOSED USES f•��ldz�-A) / C _ C ) /, e- 2 CENSUS TRACT© 2. VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) A. SUBDIVISION AGENDA FORMS MEETING DATE: % �f , (( c ITEM # ' irra r PROPOSAL RE UEST: (IJ—ro T-Evise. 4�n� rr�J L' �j c� r`n '► '' G � ro B.- EXISTING CONDITIONS: ' ��r f f1le ISSUES/DISCUSSION/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN /� �� p ni°r � � � E C� - - a-r: rzv..• � it �--�' � � � t GZ +l 0 s D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Lj r O yr V(0.4 i'`5 r L-4-ti.C(E� E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: �y ��A C w s jif4 e�nC ref , t.� -f0 A CA r . n rA ! %► 4 �. ff yJ 4 r i 0� � �� t +0 ,.� November 11, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 NAME: Greenbriar Revised Site Plan Review LOCATION: Stagecoach Road DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Greenbriar on Stagecoach, Robert D. Holloway, Inc. Inc. #200 Casey Drive 1900 Worthen Bank Bldg. Maumelle, AR 72118 Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: 851-3366 Phone: 376-9241 AREA: 3.665 Acres NO.'OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: 110-2" PROPOSED USES: Personal Care or Residential Care PLANNING DISTRICT: 12 CENSUS TRACT: 2402 A. Proposal/Request: To revise an approved site plan by adding: (a) 5,200 existing square feet to an existing 8,800 square foot structure, (b) 6 parking spaces and (c) 12 rooms to the existing 20 rooms. B. Existing Conditions: Rural, single family area. C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design: 1. Insufficient filing - the applicant is asked to provide more information regarding the types of units involved, number of people to be served and parking. 2. Final replat required to add .46 acres to accommodate the building expansion. November 11, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 --Continued D. Engineering Comments: 1. Design opening for 100 year flood. 2. Specific design on drainage structure under building. E. Staff Recommendation Reserved, until further information is received. Staff was a little -confused due to the lack of information submitted: Some explanation is needed regarding the number of new units in relation to the existing and proposed parking. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was asked to provide staff with additional information regarding the use of the property. The applicant explained that no medical facility was involved. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent. November 11, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 NAME: LOCATION: T1 T'T. C7V T r%D Lin . Greenbriar on Stagecoach, Inc. 1900 Worthen Bank Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: 376-9241 Greenbriar Revised Site Plan Review Stagecoach Road ENGINEER: Robert D. Holloway, Inc. #200 Casey Drive Maumelle, AR 72118 Phone: 851-3366 AREA: 3.665 Acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: 110-2" PROPOSED USES: Personal Care or Residential Care PLANNING DISTRICT: 12 CENSUS TRACT: 2402 A. Proposal/Request: To revise an approved site plan by adding: (a) 5,200 existing square feet to an existing 8,800 square foot structure, (b) 6 parking spaces and (c) 12 rooms to the existing 20 rooms. B. Existinq Conditions: Rural, single family area. C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design: 1. Insufficient filing - the applicant is asked to provide more information regarding the types of units involved, number of people to be served and parking. 2. Final replat required to add .46 acres to accommodate the building expansion. November 11, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 - Continued D. Engineering Comments: 1. Design opening for 100 year flood. 2. Specific design on drainage structure under building. E. Staff Recommendation Reserved, until further information is received. Staff was a little confused due to the lack of information submitted. Some explanation is needed regarding the number of new units in relation to the existing and proposed parking. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was asked to provide staff with additional information regarding the use of the property. The applicant explained that no medical facility was involved. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and 3 absent.