HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0717-C Staff AnalysisApril 20, 1993
ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: S-717-C
NAME: Heatherbrae Subdivision, Phase II, Lots 1-38 --
Preliminary Plat and Re -plat of Lot 7 and Tract "A"
LOCATION: Northwest off Heatherbrae Circle, approximately
1,000 feet north of Taylor Loop Road
DEVELOPER:
JODI WILSON
WOODHAVEN DEVELOPMENT CO.
8721 Warden Rd.
Sherwood, AR 72116
835-6258
AREA: 13.01 AC. NUMBER OF LOTS: 38
ENGINEER:
WILLIAM DEAN
CIVIL DESIGN, INC.
1001 Fair Park Blvd.
Little Rock, AR 72204
7666-4418
FT. NEW STREET: 2,000 Ft.
ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single-family residential
PLANNING DISTRICT: 1
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED: None
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes a preliminary plat for the development of
a 13.01 acre tract as a Phase II development north and west of
the existing Heatherbrae Subdivision. Also proposed is the
replatting of two parcels in the original Heatherbrae Subdivision
to provide an access point to the Phase II development and the
construction of the street into the area from the existing
subdivision. Phase II is proposed to have 38 lots and 2,000 feet
of new street construction. It is proposed that one street
traverse the length of the property with four "courts" off this
street. Replatting of the two tracts in the existing subdivision
is necessitated by the need to construct the new street through
the existing Tract "A". The new Tracts "A-1" and "A-211 are
proposed to be left undeveloped and designated as "Open Space".
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Approval of the preliminary plat by the Planning Commission
is requested for the development of a subdivision to contain
38 lots along 2,000 feet of new streets and the re -platting
of two tracts in the existing Heatherbrae Subdivision to
allow access to the new Phase II subdivision. A sidewalk is
April 20, 1993
. : 9 9 - I
ITEM NO.: 3 (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-717-C
proposed to be constructed along the one street which is to
run the length of the development; no sidewalks are proposed
for the four "courts"/cul-de-sac streets.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is currently undeveloped pasture land and wooded
acreage and is zoned R-2. The existing Heatherbrae
Subdivision is at the south-east corner of the proposed
Phase II development. To the east is property owned by the
City of Little Rock and is intended as a future City park.
To the south and west is rural residential land zoned R-2.
To the north is the Good Earth Center in a "AF" (Agriculture
and Farming) zone and undeveloped "R-2" land.
C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works Engineering comments that sidewalks are
required along one side of Glen Valley Dr., the street which
is to traverse the length of the subdivision; that the width
of the right-of-way and streets is required to be shown on
the plat; that the locations of PAGIS monuments are to be
shown; and that the Storm Water Detention and the Excavation
Ordinances are applicable to this development.
Engineering's review indicates that the reverse curves and
the 90 degree turn in the street at the access from
Heatherbrae Circle are unacceptable and that re -design of
this portion of the street is required. It was noted that
the property to the east of the Phase II development, and
north of the existing Heatherbrae Subdivision, is City -owned
property which is designated as a future park site. Access
to this future park should be provided.
Little Rock Water Works relates that a water main extension
is required. Also, Water Works comments that there is an
existing 8" main crossing the south-east corner of the
property which needs to be either abandoned or incorporated
into the water system of the project; that if it is
incorporated into the system, an easement is required.
Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that sewer
extensions with easements are required. Further, they
comment, that Wastewater Utility needs to be contacted for
allowable connection points and for main sizing.
The Little Rock Fire Department approved the plat as
submitted.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. and Southwestern Bell Telephone
Co. each commented that additional easements would be
required as shown on the returned drawings.
2
April 20, 1993
SUBDIVISION
ITEM Continued FILE O.: -717-
D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Pursuant to the Engineering comments, redesign of the street
to eliminate the reverse curves and the 90 degree turn are
required at the entrance to the addition. The drawings are
to be revised to show the width of the right-of-way and the
width of the proposed streets. The sidewalk is to be shown
along East Glen Dr. Provide access to the future park.
Since "Tract A-1" is almost totally encumbered by an ARKLA
Gas utility easement, and the tract is indicated by the
developer as "open space", providing an access easement to
the park property at this tract should seem appropriate.
Revise the plat to show the easements required by the
private utilities and by Little Rock Water Works.
E. ANALYSIS•
There are no unusual circumstances or problems associated
with this development. It is not anticipated that the
requirements by Engineering will involve insurmountable
problems.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat,
subject to meeting the requirements cited.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: APRIL 1, 1993)
Neither the developer nor the project engineer were present at
the Subdivision Committee meeting. Mr. Pat McGetrick, who was
present on other matters, indicated that he would deliver any
comments of the committee to the project engineer. The planning
staff presented the item, and the Engineering Staff discussed the
engineering observations and requirements. It was observed that
Tract "A-111, since it is made unusable by the ARKLA easement,
would make an ideal location for an access easement to the park
land to the north. The Committee recommended that this tract be
set aside for this purpose. After this discussion, the Committee
recommended that the item be forwarded to the Commission for
final disposition, subject to the requirements noted.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 20, 1993)
This item was presented by staff as included on the Consent
Agenda, and as such was approved in the unanimous eleven -member
approval of the Consent Agenda.
3