HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0707 Staff AnalysisJune 6, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 FILE NO.:
NAME: Replat Lots 22, 23, 25, & 26, Archview Acres
Subdivision
LOCATION: Off Arch Street on Archwood Dr.
DEVELOPER:
Jerry Victory
P.O. Box 164720
Little Rock, AR 72216
(501) 888-2457
ENGINEER•
Ben Kittler, Jr.
28 Dena Drive
Little Rock, AR 72206
AREA: 1.41 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 2
ZONING• "R-2"
PROPOSED USES: Residential (Single Family)
PLANNING DISTRICT: Land Mark -30
CENSUS TRACT: 40.03
FT. NEW STREET 0
VARIANCES_ _REQUE_STED :
1. Road improvements, curb & gutter, sidewalks.
2. Pipe stem configuration lot.
A. PROPOSALIREOUEST:
This developer proposes the creation of the pipe -stem
lot to allow access to the City 8" water main on
Archwood Drive.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
This site is currently undeveloped and covered with the
natural foliage of the area. There is one mobile home
on Lot 22-R. Streets are developed to County
standards.
C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
None Reported.
1
June 5, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO. : 1 (Continued)
D. ISSUES LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN:
The replat is basically in good form with resolution of
the following items required:
1. 20' wide frontage on Archview shall not be a
principal access - include in Bill of
Assurance.
2. Change variance request from pipe -stem lot to
double frontage lot.
E. ANALYSIS•
The Planning -Staff finds no serious fault with the
replat subject, however, to resolving the two items
pointed out in Item D above.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Staff recommends approval subject to resolution of
above -issues pointed out by the Planning Staff.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: (May 24, 1990)
Mr. Ben Kittler was present representing this application.
A brief general discussion was held dealing with issues
pointed out in Staff's analysis. Mr. Kittler agreed to
include provisions in the Bill of Assurance that 20' wide
road frontage will not be a principal access. He also
agreed to change variance request from pipe -stem to double
frontage lot.
There being no further discussion, the matter was forwarded
to the full Commission for resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (June 5, 1990)
The applicant was in attendance. The Planning Staff
reported that this item should be placed on the consent
agenda for approval in as much as there were no remaining
issues to be resolved. After a brief discussion, the
Commission determined it appropriate to place this item on
the consent agenda for approval. A motion was made and
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent. (It was
2
June 5, 1990
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 1 Continued
noted for the record that this item will be submitted to the
Board of Directors for variance approval.)
3