HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0374 Staff Analysismy 12, 1983
UBDIVISIONS
tem No. 7 - File No. 419
AME:
OCATION:
,EVELOPER:
,.W. Butler
,.0. Box 4116
,ittle Rock, AR
,REA: 9.68 acres
ONIPG: 'IMF-24"
Village Center Preliminary/Site
Plan Review
South of and Adjacent to
Village Shopping Center
ENrtNEER:
West and Associates, Inc.
209 N. Bailey
72214 Jacksonville, AR 72076
NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
IROPOSED USES: Apartments
History of the Site
This site has been used previously as a nursery.
Portions of it have been known to flood considerably.
A levee has been built around apartments immediately to
the east of the site for protection from.rising waters.
{. Proposal
1) The replatting of a 9.98 acre tract into lots.
,2) The construction of three apartment buildings in two
phases.
;C) Development Schedule
Phase I:
(,a) One 2-Story, 10-Unit Apartment Building
(b) 15 Parking Spaces
(c) Total Area - 7,808 Square Feet
(d) Building Line Area - 3,909 Square Feet
(e) Ratio of Building Line Area to
Total Line Area - 2.99% (3.34 du/ac)
(f) Ration of Building Line Area to Total Line Area
(left floodway) - 4.78% or 5.33 du/ac
Phase II (Future Expansion):
(a) Two 2-Story, 10-Unit Apartment Buildings
(b) One Two -Story, Eight -Unit Apartment Building
(c) 42 Parking Spaces
(d) Total Building Square Feet (including
Phase I ............. 229.696 square feet.
,7uly 12, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
(e) Total Building Land Area in Square Feet (Phase I
Included) .......... 14,848 Square Feet
(f) Ratio of Building Line Area to Total. Line
Area ......... 11.40% or 12.72 du/ac
(g) Ratio of Building Line Area to Total Land Area
(Less Floodway) 18.17% or 20.26 du/ac
D. Landscaping
The applicant has stated that "due to site location
behind University Inn and the Village Shopping Center,
minimum landscaping is anticipated. All lands will be
seated to floodway. Hedges and fence are already in
place along the southern and western property lines
providing privacy from the existing motel. A new
privacy fence will be located between the proposed
project and the shopping center."
E. Engineering Considerations
Explain plan access to the site; since the existing
access appears to be one-way. Floodway and Floodplain
Ordinance applies to this site.
F. Analysis
This proposal involves some severe problems that
interfere with the fundamental dictates of livability
described in the Subdivision Ordinance. First of all,
there is very inadequate access to the site by a
15-foot one-way easement that runs between an existing
shopping center and existing motel. The applicant must
demonstrate a viable means of access. A minimum of two
lanes is needed. The flooding issue must also be
discussed since all of the site is in the floodplain
and part is in the floodway. The existing apartments
to the east were developed by the same owner and has
been known to have water almost to the second floor
during heavy rains.
Fire Department approval of this plan is necessary due
to the access of the drainage. Staff is not
comfortable that this proposal provides a living
environment as in the best interest of public safety.
Questions of access and flooding will have to be
resolved before staff support can be given.
G. Staff Recommendation
Denial as filed.
July 12, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 7 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
This application was not represented; therefore, the
Committee did not discuss specifics of this case. General
discussion involving the staff and the Engineering
Department reflected several significant issues which the
Planning staff will attempt to resolve by meeting with the
applicant prior to the July 12 meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. Since
the applicant was not present at the Subdivision Committee
meeting and there were still several basic issues
unresolved, a motion was made and passed for deferral until
the August 16th Planning Commission meeting. The item will
also go back to the Subdivision Committee meeting on
July 28th. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes
and 2 absent.