Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-035-1 Staff AnalysisDecember 18, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 NAME: LOCATION: DEVELOPER: Flake and Company Little Rock, AR AREA: 9.3 acres ZONING: Fairfield Plaza NE Corner of Rebsamen Park and Cantrell Roads ENGINEER: Edward G. Smith & Associates 401 Victory Street Little Rock, AR 72201 374-1666 NO. OF LOTS: 5 FT. NEW STREET: 0 PROPOSED USES: Offices PLANNING DISTRICT: Heights/Hillcrest CENSUS TRACT: 15 A. Site History None. B. Existing Conditions This project is located at the intersection of a collector and major arterial. The area consists of major commercial establishments and other high traffic generators. A portion of the site is developed as office. C. Development Proposal This is a plan to replat 9.3 acres into five lots for office use. A private street system is proposed. D. Engineering Comments 1. Request status of new roadway on the north of the property. Is there an access easement for the street? 2. Provide drainage plans for structure under private road. December 18, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 6 - Continued 3. Modify drainage easements to reflect current drainage. 4. Additional right-of-way and street improvements may be required on Cantrell at the southeast corner of this plat. Meet with City engineers regarding this. E . Analysis As Engineering has indicated, clarification should be provided as to the authorization of the private street in the drive. All building lines need to be as required for appropriate zoning districts. Lots 1 and 2 should be as required for "0-2" and Lots 3-5, as required for "0-3." F . Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. G. Subdivision Committee Review The main issue for discussion involved the location of the private drive across and abutting ownership. The applicant stated that there was a committement to an easement across the property. Staff requested that this be reflected on the plat. Water Works - 16" steel water main crossing this property and a 50' easement. This will have to be 4LLANNING relocated or buildings will have to be relocated. COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. No one objected. A motion for approval, subject to the reflection of an easement across an abutting ownership on the plat, was made and passed by a vote of: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open.