HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0321 Staff AnalysisMarch 15, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 11 - File No. 321
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVELOPER:
R.M. Stefka
Route 5, Box 496-H
Little Rock, AR 72212
Phone: 868-5406
APPLICANT:
AREA:
Stefka Preliminary Plat
South of Highway 10,
Intersection of South Kautillus
and Forest Lane
ENGINEER:
Sam Davis
West 8th Street
Little Rock, AR
W.D. Stefka
Phone: 868-5715
NO. OF LOTS:
ZONING: Outside City
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
None.
STAFF REPORT:
3 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
This is a proposal to subdivide a parcel of land into three
lots for residential use. This originated as a request for
water service to Lot 1. The applicant's intent is to deed
this lot to his son.
The Planning Commission denied the water request since it
constituted an illegal subdivision. It did allow the
applicant a temporary water meter provided he filed a final
plat in 90 days.
The site is in a rural area, which is located outside of the
City and outside of the referendum area. It consists of a
variety of residential uses. Staff would only like the
applicant to submit:
(1) Clarification as to why a lot with an existing single
family home is left out of the plat; and
(2) Submit a final that shows lots which correspond to and
accommodate all the existing structures on the
property.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval, subject to comments.
March 15, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 11 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant reported that the lot left out of the plat was
not in his ownership. Staff commented that street
improvements were not necessary since this tract was outside
of the boundaries for urban development as defined by the
City's Board. A motion was made for approval, subject to
the submission of a final plat with lots that correspond to
and accommodates all existing structures on the property.
The motion passed by a vote of 2 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. Staff
reported that the applicant had complied with the
Subdivision Committee's request. A motion was made and
passed for approval by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes and
5 absent.