Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0317-1 Staff Analysis(uTlaawwri5 xauoTssTwwon - buTuTegsgv) •uoTquagsge I pup quasge Z 'saou p 'seAe g go agoA a Aq passed pup apew seM leivap jog uoTgow V •butuoz gods pagngTqsuoo pup gdaouoo and aqq go asn ageiadoiddeut up seM eaje aqq uT asn adAq sTg4 Jo lenoadde qeq4 ujaouoo passajdxa uoTssTwwoJ aqJ •quawdolanap uTeldpool3 gsuTebe ainseaw aAT4oagoad e se pup ueld sXJed pasodoad e go gjed a se Agjadoid sTgq buTaTnboe uT gsazaJUT ue peu AgTO aqq gegq paJJodaJ seM 4T gotgM 6uTJnp p'Caq seM uoTssriosTp V •ueATb uaaq peq aoigou aadoad gegq 6uTUIWJagap Aq gsanbea sTgq oq papuodsea AaujoggV Agtn aqs •ssaappe buojm e oq anp aoTgou jadoad pajapTsuoo Aagq 4egM paAlaoaa qou peu Aagq aouis paajajap aq wagT aqq gegq pagsanbal AagJ •poogaogqbTau apeawAuuns aqq woJJ quasaad aaaM suosaad aaagy •quasajd ggoq aaam 'aTMOU •saw 'Agjedoad aqq go jauMo pup 'laiueaoW uegS •aW 'queoTldde aqy =NOIZOV NOISSIWWOD 9NINNVZd •quasge £ 'saou p 'saAe Z :jo agoA e Aq passed uoTgow aqy •waTgoad AeMpoolg aqq go uoTgnlosaa pup AeMpoolj aqq uT aoeld aXeq pinoM uoigonjgsuoo ou gegq 6uTgou pup AeMpoolJ aqq Jano quawasea ue buTMogs geld a Jo uoTssiwgns aqq oq goaCgns 'lenojdde jog spew seM uoTgow V •4aaa4s ggjTd gsaM uo squawanojdwT 6uT3[ew pup qol buiXjed aqq buiAed woij pagdwaxa aq pinoo aq 4e44 pa40nJ4sul rile seM aH •buTseal jog algTssod aq Aew squawabueJae 'Agaadoid ajTqua aq-4 Anq oq paqueM AgTO aqq 3T jo 'AeMpool3 aqq go Lepunoq aqq oq geld pinoo aH •paaapTsuoo aq oq suoTgdo aaaM ajagq gegq pegonjgsuT seM queoTldde aql •uTeldpool3 aqq 3o lbJquoo aneq oq elisap e go asneoaq Agiadoid sT44 UT gsaJ94uT ue seq AgTO aq4 '(loJ4uo0 pool) job) XaaaD Xoou anoidwT oq lesodoid aqq 3o gored e sV •ueld shied Mau a UT papnlouT sT 4egJ eaJP ue UT Ael Agjadoad sTgq Jo 4sow gegq pawaoJuT seM queoildde aqy :NOISVQNdWWOOdH ddsSIWWOO NOISIAIQgnS •IIA •apew s4uawwoo oq go@lgns 'lenoiddv N0ISVQNdWW00dH daVIS 'IA panuTquoa - L -ON wa4I SNOT S IARMS E861 'ST uoJeW •aq?s bu?pT?nq aqq go AeM aq4 u? Ibu g4Moabaapun Tpangeu pup saaaq TTe u?pgaa os (Z) •aq?s abeaogs TeangTno?-4aog e se 'sasn aaggo gsow aoJ Teo?goead aq qou pTnoM go?qM 'pane u?eTdpooT3 agq u? pup, 3o asn ags (T) AHdOSOZIHd GNV SS Ii.T,6'�rg0 JR-sWdOZSASo 'II °u?eTdpooT3 aq4 Jo AT9aT4ua pasodwod s? aapu?ewaa aqs •401 uaagsea aqq oqu? AemjTeq spuagxa pup Agaadoad aqq gbnoagi sgno ATTeuobe?p goTgM (gull Alaadoad aqq woJJ ,OVT x ,OV) AeMpooTJ e s? aan4e99 Tpangeu queupwiad v •gsnagaapun go paaeaTo uaaq ATquaoaa seq 14UpoeA sT go?qM '3Tpq uaa�saM aqs •eauep?sea aweaJ 'AT?we3 aTbu?s a 30 s4stsuoo Agaadoad aqq 30 JTeg uaa4spa ags •gaaags qq5 4saM 3o pue aqq Aq ggaou aq4 uo pue igojngo a Aq gsea 944 uo 'spooM pup sxaaao go bu?gs?suoo sgoeaq aTgpdoTanapun Aq gsaM pup ggnos aqq uo paaapaoq si a4?s sags SNOISIQN03 9NIZSIX9 °I „•aDd„ 04 „Z-II„ Pauoz eaap up A3?sseToaa os ebeaogs asnogaaeM : SSS[1 aSSOdo-dd (pasodoad) (bu?-4s?xS) „Z-H„ :JNINOZ p 30 ° S3 T : SIM do *OR £V19-LZZ :auogd ir8£L-S9S :auogd SOZZL HV 'Xoo-d algWl III °xoo2t aT�?q aToa?o aaxoaaga TOZ egea Aoas Ta?ueaoW uegS : HOASAHnS UV °NooU aTggTq ga,aaqS qqS °M 6T6L „Clod„ sgnag5 pup sumPU Ag4TeaH :�SdogsAsa NOIZvooq Swviq LT,: 'oN aT?3 - L °oN wa-4I SNOISIAIGSnS £86T 'ST goapW March 15, 1983 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 7 - File No. 317 r]AME : LOCATION: DEVELOPER: Healthy Lawns and Shrubs "PCD" 7919 W. 5th Street Little Rock, AR SURVEYOR: Stan McDaniel Troy Laha 201 Cherokee Circle Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 565-7384 Phone: 227-6143 AREA: 1.4 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. OF NEW ST_: 0 ZONING: "R-2" (Existing) '— "PCD" (Proposed) PROPOSED USES: Warehouse Storage REQUEST: To reclassify an area zoned "R-2" to "PCD." I. EXISTING CONDITIONS This site is bordered on the south and west by undevelopable tracts consisting of creeks and woods, on the east by a church, and on the north by the end of West 5th Street. The eastern half of the property consists of a single family, frame residence. The western half, which is vacant, has recently been cleared of underbrush. A permanent natural feature is a £loodway (40' x 140' from the property line) which diagonally cuts through the property and extends halfway into the eastern lot. The remainder is composed entirely of the floodplain. II. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY (1) The wouldsnotfbeand in the prractical foromostlotherawhich uses, as a horticultural storage site. (2) To retain all trees and natural undergrowth not in the way of the building site. March 15, 1983 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 7 - Continued VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to comments made. VII. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The applicant was informed that most of this property lay in an area that is included in a new parks plan. As a part of the proposal to improve Rock Creek (for flood control), the City has an interest in this property because of a desire to have control of the floodplain. The applicant was instructed that there were options to be considered. He could plat to the boundary of the floodway, or if the City wanted to buy the entire property, arrangements may be possible for leasing. He was also instructed that he could be exempted from paving the parking lot and making improvements on West Fifth Street. A motion was made for approval, subject to the submission of a plat showing an easement over the floodway and noting that no construction would take place in the floodway and resolution of the floodway problem. The motion passed by a vote of: 2 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant, Mr. Stan McDaniel, and owner of the property, Mrs. Lowie, were both present. Three persons were present from the Sunnymeade neighborhood. They requested that the item be deferred since they had not received what they considered proper notice due to a wrong address. The City Attorney responded to this request by determining that proper notice had been given. A discussion was held during which it was reported that the City had an interest in acquiring this property as a part of a proposed Parks plan and as a protective measure against floodplain development. The Commission expressed concern that approval of.this type use in the area was an inappropriate use of the PUD concept and constituted spot zoning. A motion for denial was made and passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 abstention. (Abstaining - Commissioner. Summerlin) March 15, 1983 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 8 - File No. 318 NAME: Brainard Place "PRD" LOCATION: S. Valentine and Lamar DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Harney Construction Mehlburger, Tanner, Renshaw 2723 Foxcroft Road Little Rock, AR Suite 108 Phone: 375-5331 Little Rock, AR 72207 AREA: 6.41 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 ZONING: "R-4" (Existing) PROPOSED USES: Residential REQUEST: To reclassify an area from "R-4" to "PRD." I. DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY (A) Accommodates increased rental need generated by new and existing medical facilities and end of economic life of existing rental units in the area. (B) Sets a trend for quality development. II. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS A. Parcel Size - - - - - - - - - - 6,800 sq. ft. B. Existing Zoning - - - - - - - - - "R-4" C. Development Scheme: 1. No. of Units - - - 4 Two -Bedroom Town Houses 2. Unit Type - - - - - Duplex (2 Bldgs.) 3. Square Footage - - 3,456 sq. ft. D. Building Coverage - - - 1,484 sq. ft. E. Open Space - - - - - - - 3,864 sq. ft. March 15, 1983 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 8 - Continued F. Parking - - -- - - - - - 4 spaces III. ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS None at this time. IV. STAFF ANALYSIS This site is located in a multifamily area that consists mainly of older housing stock that has been converted to duplexes, though the property is bordered on the north by a single family residence. The only existing structure is a very recently constructed duplex on the west, which the existing zoning allows. The applicant is proposing to replat the lot and build a similar unit on the vacant portion to the east. Staff is concerned with the possibility that one of the resulting lots may be sold. That is not advisable since this would then create lots smaller than usual for this land use. Also, the plan should be revised to accommodate the six parking spaces required as designed, it is doubtful that adequate space exists. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Since the applicant was not present, the Committee decided to pass this to the Commission without recommendation. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was not present. There were no objectors. The motion was made and passed to defer the item for one month in order for it to be returned to the Subdivision Committee and the applicant contacted. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.