Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0261 ApplicationORDINANCE No. 15,345 <. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNSD UNTI' DRVELOPMEINT AND ESTABLISHING A 11PC011 DATRICT TITLRD WEST MARKHAM AUTO MALL "SHORT -FORM PCD" (Z-2245-C) IN THE CITY OF LITTLF, FLOCK, ARXANSAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 43 OF THE; CODE 'OF ORDINANC) S OF THB CIT�f OF LITTLE It crq ND FOR OTHRk PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS•OF THE CITY OF LITTLR ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the zone clnssifiCntion of the following Aescribed property be chtinged from "C-3" (Commercial) 1.0 "PCD" (P.lnnnerrl Commercial. Distri-ct). Lot, 1, west Mark1lilm Lnil i Add.ttion to the City of Little Rcck (West Markham). -SECTION 2. That the preliminary site develoqpent plan/plat be approved as, recommenr7ed by tine Little Rock Planning Commission. SECTION 3. Thai: 4hez change ill zoning classification Coll' -emplated for West Mar'r.hem Auto, rdall is conditioned upon obt.,lil i l)ri a final pinn s7pprovcl from the Planning Commission Within the L• ilne .,,per. t r: ied by Article IX, Section V .101 of the Code of or djjjr.t7GC'S. SFCTXOM 4. ':!hint: the map. r.eferrecl to in Chapter 43-1 of the Code of 4rdi.nnnces or the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and designated distract: map be and it is hereby amended to the extint and in th- respects necessary to afEeet and designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall take effect. -and be, in full 'force upon final approval of the plan by tyre ' Planning Commission. PASSED: September 15, 1987 ATTEST:/,'Lr�ke, �".�cl City C Jane Czech Mayor Lottie Shackelford FILED & RECOROLL C ,age 67`56249 Lei ALS 31 1.4 0 31W BUOFASSURANCE Grr -- 'IPaGAs+�ct Cn�elRCwxcii�fii h KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESETS: THAT, WHEREAS, J. Wpm Wa"r.w, G. 'Thomas Eisele and W. Martin Mete are vines of the lands lying In the County of PuLUM. State Of Aakansas, dastxbad on the altacted 'Exhft M and incorporated herein. AND, WHEREAS, It Is desirab!e that all Of 1 W above-rele.-incad property be subdivided into a lot; NOW, THEREFORE. IARTNESSETK THAT. WE, the Ovmsrs have mused sadd tract of bnd to be surveyed by White-Dwars S Assodates, a Registered Prolessior►d Englraer and Rechftred Land Surveyor, respecOv ly. and a Fiat thereof made which kUntt W by me M of LOT 5 WEST MARKHAM LAND ADDITION, and dated 1997 stud by the sIgnature Of the Clr=R Cleric erhd ex-otiiCb Recorder of Pulaski County, Arkansas, as Ins-trumern No. . end the Owner does narety; make this BA of Asuwance. 87-56249 AN'D. thn Q,rat hcseby certifies is It has tzW off. platted. " Sutkvlded. and dm hereby izyoff. plat. and subdivide said real asWa in geomdttncs with Bald plat. The lands embraco In seat plat shall be former known as LOT 6 WEST MARKWJU LAND ADOr K That an stops of ground spawn end 6mensioned an said pia! m rkad 'LMly Eanfiemant' and 'Dralnags Eawrze7t° are rzaservaKC! tot tt;s use of the pubtic ertMea at Such U13ftles as designated. and far draInago purposes rospertively, subject at an times to the prgW authorldes and to Me eascmenl hor,:in mserred. That an strips of ground shown and dl-menaloned on said plat and me lmd 'Cross Easement" are fes -mod for flue mutual care', s and ingress W bb confla our to the OaS=-ant WA shall remain clew of any obstruction at aN fumes. That an strips of gtourd shown and dirrrensioned on said plat and marked `Electrical Safety Easement' are reserved seed burdenod with full cvrrVzance withh reguta4iorta of 1!t! National Electrical Safety Code In *!tact at the fte of eanstr Zion of any Slruc are. sign. andror landscaping. Arkansas Pourer and Ugh!. or Ns succe'Msar, shad be nofilled prior to the erection of any structure wdhin the ensemcnt for review and a Moval of cornpUnce wait applicable fegutaflors. The Ming of oft M of Assurance and pie for record in the Office of the Cir.M Clerk and ex-0fficio Recorder of P&-,-c J County 9W be a va."d rstd cur:; 'a de: c y and &'u .cation of the eanernants Shown on said ptaL Hereafter. conveyance end dc=,ip zn of said tench by bt numtsr. Ls sihowi an sa'd pt L shall be a proper and vs'fic font d frtian ihereot The lot In Said subdIvision st•,ail be ruh4oct to the kNowing covonwd% b +Mil: 1. Said land wNfhin LOT 5 WEST MAWKhM LAID ADDITION " be held, owned, and used In oa,;,pllsrrca eah tfhe zoning, s ion. lWWscVUng, rind elfin ordinances of to City of Utte Rode as tfhey apptled b said WW at the time of recording of this Instrument or as such ordinances may be amended from bete b time to provide for less restrictive use. ProvWed however. under no circumstaroe shaft a n:ar yard ce=cc be required or a�pticd to any of -;zld MM& 2. The h tum owner or owners of Lot 6 ahaN maintain clong or -. '=,ant b the southern loll Itno as shown on the plat an eight (8) bet cpau;ua tenca untd such tune as relief Thom fhb p wi;lon Is gr4rtod by the Planning Commission of the City of Lkft Rook by application In compliance with aN regulations for Xo1*g Prop". S. Any and all eavenants, provislona, or restrictions set forth In this U of rc Asaurisno may be amended, fn x%Ud, extended. clanged. or cancelled, in whole•nr: In Pw% by a wrltlen instrument signsd and acknowledged by the owner of "J land hereby platted and 00 provls'.arrs of such Instrument so execuled rhaU b4' binding from and altar th tfaia It is duly Mod for record In Pulaski County;;; %i 112 0 City of Little Rock _ _ Engineering Division Department of 701 West Markham Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 371-4800 March 10, 1989 Mr. H. Bradley Walker 300 Riverside Building 2228 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR 72202 Re: West Markham Land Addition Fence Requirement Dear Mr. Walker: At its meeting on January 24, 1989, the Little Rock Planning Commission voted to recommended to the City Board of Directors, modification of the fence requirement along the rear of this addition. On February 21, 1989, the Board of Directors approved the proposed modification. Please accept this letter as notice that this property must be brought into compliance with the approved modification by March 21, 1989, thirty (30) days from the Board of Directors approval. The eight foot (8') board fence must be extended from the southwest corner of the office building to the southwest corner of the vehicular use area located on the west side of the office building. Gates must be erected between the south corners of the office building and the ends of the fence to control pedestrian access. The requirement for a fence behind the office building and from the southwest corner of the vehicular use area located west of the office building to the west corner of the property was deleted by the Board of Directors. If you have any questions, please call me at 371-4844. Sincerely, Kenny. Cott Chief of Zoning & Signs KS/ps cc: Garland Street Andy's of Arkansas 11,521 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72211 TO►�,� I AL. --w '.J , NAME: T_n0AMTnh7. M VN7 VT_nn V n . H. Bradley Walker 2228 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR Phone: 666-4316 666-4242 AREA: West Markham Auto Mall Short Form PCD (Z-2245-C) Lot 1, West Markham Land Addition to the City of Little Rock ARCHITECT: Renshaw and Associates Little Rock, AR NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: ZONING: "C-3" to PCD PROPOSED USE: Auto Parts and Supply Mall A. Proposal (1) To provide a speciality shopping center, which provides in one location, several high quality "quick service" automotive retailers which offer various automobile maintenance products and services. N (2) Two buildings with 10 to 13-units and a larger building on 2.258 acres. Total square footage is $25,000. (3) 116 parking spaces. B. Engineering Comments (1) Show square footage of landscaped areas. (2) Show floor elevations on buildings. ';YT-VL:i'^1` 1. T.".'�;. ._"..".._N tl:'=] ... 'sr .-.,".-,•.hm'".'a•r_nr.u�l-'. 1 ,'Hnn v";+-'Tvc,Y:�3.'+'s. Z-2245-C - Continued (3) Indicate erosion control design on south. (4) Indicate an "exit only" sign on the western drive. C. Issues/Legal/!technical/Design (1) Revised site plan to indicate vicinity map, legal description, and full dimensions on drives and parking. (2) Specify use group for Buildings A and B. ( 3 ) If service station is planned, needs to be indicated on plan along with pump stations and canopy. (4) Applicant may be required to submit landscaping on perimeter drive to City Beautiful Commission. C. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Applicant submitted a revised site plan that addressed some traffic concerns and changed the building in a northeast corner. He agreed to submit more information on the use groups proposed. Staff's recommendations - approval, subject to comments made, plus: (1) no vehicle access drives on the south side of the building parallel to the creek, in order to reduce noise, and (2) architectural treatment of roof and rear of building parallel to the creeks so as to make it attractive and compatible with the residential area to the south. ! Srlt Q�I, •S.. .,r T24YlRR�a. r .�. r.. � � r �'1'L�" s•S :; IJJt:'�`�. .. .. _-. .. 'H9r.n :•r. .. .r r __�.. -y r_ ... w.-2 �::J �`!F �:��•c Z-2245-C - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (6-30-87) The applicant was present. The staff offered its recommendation. Mr. Jim Daly and Mr. Brad Walker were present representing the proposal. They offered their comment on the staff recommendation which was an objection to losing access for double loaded type auto uses. Mr. Walker offered to build a fence to screen the rear area of the buldings in lieu of the doors. A general discussion then followed. The Chairman then asked for objectors. There were four in attendance. Mr. George Bowman, of Ashwood Road, discussed the excavation; the unsightly developments along Markham rearing on his neighborhood. The loss of trees to the City flood and drainage project. Mr. Jeff Hoyt addressed his concerns as being sound from this type of use. He offered additional history. Mrs. Agness Beale, an Ashwood resident, offered her concerns and a history of this area. Mr. Robert Brown and Mr. Charles Basham were present representing the property owner to the west. This property was proposed for development and Mr. Brown stated their interest as being in need -of cooperation on development of the common access drive on the west boundary of this proposal, plus building orientation and landscaping. A lengthy general discussion followed revolving around fences and height, number of rear garage doors, and use mix. A motion was then made to approve the application which motion included an 8-foot fence along the south property line limiting the uses to the by -right and conditional use in "C-3" except for auto repair garage, the hours of operation to be limited to 7 a.m. through 7 p.m., and the garage doors on the rear of the building be limited to eight. The motion failed by a vote of 4 ayes, 4 noes, and 3 absent. The failure of the motion automatically defers this matter to the next scheduled meeting, August 11, 1987. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION:- (7-23-87) There was no one present representing the application. There was no discussion of the proposal. Z-2245-C - Continued Hall and reporting what was observed as a violation. Mrs. Agness Beale and Mr. Bowman, residents of Birchwood, then offered comments on the fence and perhaps some zoning action that could commit the fence to the property. A lengthy discussion then followed during which Mr. Basham indicated he was reluctant to accept maintenance responsibility for the fence. When asked, Mr. Walker could not state who would have responsibility for permanent repair or replacement of damaged fencing but that it could be worked out. After further discussion of procedural matters as to involving the sold sites and the commitments offered, a motion was made. The motion was to approve the amended Planned Commercial District application with these conditions: 1. That the south wall of the main building be limited to six overhead doors. 2. The six doors to have automatic closer devices with a maximum three minute open time. 3. That the south property line of the entire subdivision be provided with an eight -foot opaque } wood fence and permanent maintenance. This requirement to be resolved before submitting the I,- application to the Board of Directors. 4. The uses to be limited to the "C-3" District use group plus those uses characterized as auto speciality shops from the "C-4" use group. These include such as auto glass and muffler but exclude engine rebuilding, paint, or body shops. 5. Normal business hours for the auto related are to be 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. 6. Designate the area along the west property line used as common drive as a "No Parking" zone and so marked on -site. 7. Limit to four the number Qf overhead doors on the west building face adjacent to Mr. Basham's development and the ,facade redesign. �'r�`'`" • r . :2 :•L3�Tfn:roV T7' rw._; ^c: .•r, .. .._ ./"'•!.ihf.9AYJ 1•'v^ .r � r .. .cep. �_.. - — -va, ti sr • •,-.�--.....+_eu+x�ra.a aiv cr're�aw. Z-2245-C - Continued B. Revise the site plan to include -all of the conditions. 9. Engineering Division requirements. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent, 1 open position. 0 r r .r ••. .r _ _.- -_a^-Tr_-1-rP rYllesb�r�r +•w.:.... r•r •.•..�u,:_,._-a'sa_.�•.••�••e>•.•�-r-r-.-�••..-_. �.• .•am.—vxo.-r. ..sr-.c,ne r�r err-�..•e-r. �.�a•ra :-.��lC�Sb TV �1 U)J ' . -fiiX-::� 9AM )L. 0 C RZ, C IC, t-- A / po&jcs L- 0 r AAI [] , m G &a elf.. _- ' M1 LAuF c(_ T� _ L.� C—sT --ram t ki k C-0 - I D t -L c F 55 . z 6 k� Atd- 6r VWL6TCerT JkjHWO MLPE bVeS7ea w L -5 S ! kG ,05 .d d Al L_-r + t at m -H, iN-6- l.j Cj - do ! v� ,5 --C- AXb 7AC- Tj115 IWPr �WELaP6D (A/WN /W Gr�,e6��,1TAN dF 117dO,JsWwffJ Jig, Ouev r .efO ;MT ?*— ' 1.s yd-� WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501) 666-4242 September 15, 1987 Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock City Hall Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request. Sincerely yours, H. Bradley Walker Agent for Property Owners HBW:mtk WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501)666-4242 September 15, 1987 Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock City Hall Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request. Sincerely yours, H. Bradley Walker Agent for Property Owners HBW:mtk WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501)666-4242 September 15, 1987 Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock City Hall Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request. Sincerely yours, H. Bradley Walker Agent for Property Owners HBW:mtk I� :Aty of Little Rock I Office of ,Comprehensive �., Planning January 30, 1989 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. H. Bradley Walker 2228 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR 72202 Subject: West Markham Land Addition fence requirement Dear Mr. Walker: At its meeting on January 24, 1989, the Little Rock Planning Commission voted to recommend to the City Board of Directors modification of the fence requirement along the rear of this addition. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Board for its meeting on February 21, 1989. This is required due to the fence commitment being a part of a Planned Unit Development authorization. If you have questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to call my office. Very my yours, R IC Current Planning Manager RW:gIs cc: Mr. George Bowman Mrs. Agness Beale 0 City of Little Rock Engineering Division Department of 701 West Markham Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 371-4800 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 24, 1989 TO: Gary Greeson, Director of Comprehensive Planning FROM: Don McChesney, City Engineer j� SUBJECT: Planning Commission Agenda Ite—m�`�12�, January 24, 1989 Fence Waiver Request - Andy's Restaurants Office Building, 11521 West Markham Street The fencing which is the subject of this waiver request has been relied on as a very important and necessary part of the development of this property with regard to screening the use from the residential area to the south. The landscape code would normally impose a requirement for a six (6) foot high opaque screen between all vehicular use areas and any adjacent residential property. This would certainly be the spirit and intent of the landscape code in this particular situation. The approved landscape plan for the subject property did show proposed construction of an eight (8) foot high fence all the way to the west terminus of the property. Technically, there is an intervening strip of property zoned C-3 between the West Markham Land Addition and the residential property to the south, which would void the screening requirement. Since this strip of land is largely drainage easement and otherwise undevelopable, no other opportunity for screening in conjunction with future development exists. The Environmental Codes staff has worked closely with the development of this property and has granted some alternative landscaping arrangements because of some of the physical characteristics of the sites. In view of the intensity of the development of this specific property and staff concern, as well as opposition of some neighborhood residents, I recommend denial of the requested waiver. WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501) 666-4242 January 10, 1989 Mr. Richard Wood Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Dear Richard: I appreciate your confirmation of the deferral on the West Markham additional fence issue. I look forward to resolving the matter on January 24. Cordially yours, r' r H. ro ley Walker HBO, :mtk M \/E 11 JAN 12 1989 otCity of Little Rock Office of 723 West Markham Comprehensive Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Planning January 5, 1989 Mr. H. Bradley Walker Walker Real Estate 300 Riverside Building 2228 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR 72202 Re: West Markham Land Addition Dear Mr. Walker: The Little Rock Planning Commission, at its meeting on January 3, 1989, deferred action on the West Markham Land Addition fence issue. This matter has be reset for January 24th at 1:00 p.m. in the Board of Directors' Chambers, City Hall. The other interested parties in this matter have been advised of the new hearing date. Therefore, no follow-up on your part will be required. If additional information is required, I will contact you at a later date. Very truly yours, ICHARD WOOD Current Planning Manager RW:gls cc: Case File WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501) 666-4242 December 14, 1988 Mr. Richard Wood Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Dear Mr. Wood: Please recall my letter of November 14, 1988, in connection with a review by the Planning Commission of improvements made in the above referenced development. Today when we checked on the date for this review, we were made aware that it is scheduled for January 3, 1989. We would ask that the matter be deferred until a date after January 16, 1989. Mr. Garland Streett, president of Andy's of Arkansas, is the property owner most concerned with the final resolution of this matter. Mr. Streett would like to be present at the commission's review, and he will be out of town through January 16, 1989. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will assume that the item is deferred and you will notify us in writing of any further scheduling on the commission's agenda. Cordially yours, ey Walker HBW:mtk cc: Mr. George Bowman Garland Streett Don McChesney Jim Hathcock DEC 15 1988 t City of Little Rock Office of 723 West Markham Comprehensive Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Planning November 29, 1988 Mr. George Bowman 11700 Ashwood Drive Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Screening fence along Rock Creek adjacent to the Andy's office and restaurant Dear Mr. Bowman: The purpose of this communication is to provide notice of appeal by Mr. Bradley Walker of the requirement for placement of fence along Rock Creek. Mr. Walker and the owner of the Andy's restaurant have determined that they desire to provide fencing in a form inconsistent with that approved by the City. The Planning Commission will hear this appeal at its public hearing at 1:00 p.m. on January 1989. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors' Chambers, Second Floor, Little Rock City Hall. This item, due to its nature, will be one of the latter items on that Public Hearing agenda. Therefore, I cannot provide a specific time of day that the matter will be discussed. I would recommend your attendance at 1:00 p.m. If you require further conversation or information on this subject, do not hesitate to call. Sinc ely, Richard Wood 1� Current Planning Manager RW:gIs cc: Case File Don McChesney Ken Scott an a WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2225 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501) 666-4242 November 14, 1988 Mr. Richard Wood Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Dear Richard: It has been called to my attention that some property owners wish to require the extension of the fencing related to the project. It is our belief that the improvements made are preferable and in the best interests of the city as a whole. In that regard, we would request that the Planning Commission review the commitment made in connection with fencing of the property. I would welcome the scheduling at the convenience of the staff and the commission and await hearing from you in that regard. Cordially yours, le- A - - FF'Pfadley Walker HBW:mtk cc: Mr. George Bowman Garland Streett Don McChesney Jim Hathcock WALKER REAL ESTATE 300 RIVERSIDE BLDG. 2228 COTTONDALE LANE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 (501)666-4242 September 15, 1987 Office of Comprehensive Planning City of Little Rock City Hall Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request. Sincerely yours, H. Bradley Walker Agent for Property Owners HUvV:mtk 5' CaR6 curs \ W/TH QQ'DR/t/EW.�rS NI Ama is 'QO wA Esr jqo,e)q,4,4f AapYs {cSTAvRAwT ISS►� OS�' u �s.S' /7s' /25" izo /go• � � At SIN 72��IDENcc- j/7dd ds14&dVP U . ��►:�♦ WESTMA,P,(�flgM LAND qDD/T/CbV NORTH 2 d mPY S LcsTAv Rt-W T IVA")gA,41 now 71-1/s .. Ahr 5 GJRB C✓TS � ,v1 wiry 40 �oRiVEwarS �-S� /vliq l� /�/�f-v "/ �%��E% isyy olu Na 1 fad Avo is aces �5. - ? yB. \ yA. 38. \ 3A. a IA. Atj -a s�"rOon �1 p/2 TES.ornrC.G //74d ,4S�r..fU)0'.I "0/ . ����� w�sTM�,�rgM�wo goo�rrc�v MonrN 2 Tis .. PZAr i V) � GURB C!?S w�rfl 4D o e/�Eways WET — /' A R K gAAv `S7REET' ISyy,Qy� •� 4!00 S a r' i29' �s' /79.5' /75' /.2S' /10' 3A. Z6, �a Zit Preliminary Plat - AERZ,17T /8o, W,56771VRO" CANP q4W/r1W /ZEWIS�o -V-50ie7 4 SUBDIVISION DATE P ITEM NO. _ FILE NO. S Z& Z2-?.Z4 S- C NAME: U ►Eil A& c9=!AA—J-tl �, VA G-b r> LOCATION: Itlf!�-5dLh�i4A4. /ST Jan r 5vi S/DF DEVELOPER ENGINEER NAME: STREET ADDRESS 704 eWty- 51fdc CITY/STATE/ZIP :22 TELEPHONE NO. _ . 2 AREA NUMBER OF LOTS 1 FT. NEW STREET ZONING PRGPOSED USES PLANNING DISTRICT CENSUS TRACT YAK M10ES--MUSS-TE-D : ' cx��sTS i V I �7-w 0 F -0 6-� AL-0Al G 5vr[74 APeA-ry' b,VC-- e4w.160- (, ploys nmr-s AAr'rW1,Wl( rr-Alcc ram- 6,gVc,74(. 4.) REGISTRATION FORM._ FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the City Planning Offige. Room 305, City Hallc Little Rock. I wish to speak about Item # ____. on the Agenda. I am opposed Nam Add for '' Item # Telephone Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the City Room 305x City Hall, Little Roc�. I wish to speak about Item # on the Agenda. I am opposed for Item #'� . Name Address -f Telephone r ^ 4 > Date----CS�/L]/f J REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the City Planning i Roo fl / H Rock I wish to speak about Item # ` C91 on the Agenda. I am opposed r. Name l� Address Date / C9- /"74 `~ for Item # Telephone S' GJR6 curs wires 40'DRIVEL(/A)P' �c No AlIDy5 3 W967-1V91F #, 4h1 his PL,4T H i A Nrr(s Pw3rA,'a;AIT s L/q E'ST M.4 R fCfIAM STREET ;7,5' '16' /07.s' i %q. ' 75' —25- in 3A. ,r � � W. MAMWAIAM �� r ANDY a° OFFICE i PKNG r3i/ZCe-/WOO® ADDN. Wes � lWa *-kA Anq( At(Wt 7i6 JrAl�- Fence /w��"aADn NORTH um QKKI� F&jc� im PLAC F— w