HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0261 ApplicationORDINANCE No. 15,345 <.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNSD UNTI'
DRVELOPMEINT AND ESTABLISHING A 11PC011
DATRICT TITLRD WEST MARKHAM AUTO
MALL "SHORT -FORM PCD" (Z-2245-C)
IN THE CITY OF LITTLF, FLOCK, ARXANSAS,
AMENDING CHAPTER 43 OF THE; CODE 'OF
ORDINANC) S OF THB CIT�f OF LITTLE It crq
ND FOR OTHRk PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS•OF THE CITY OF
LITTLR ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That the zone clnssifiCntion of the
following Aescribed property be chtinged from "C-3"
(Commercial) 1.0 "PCD" (P.lnnnerrl Commercial. Distri-ct).
Lot, 1, west Mark1lilm Lnil i Add.ttion to the City of Little
Rcck (West Markham).
-SECTION 2. That the preliminary site develoqpent
plan/plat be approved as, recommenr7ed by tine Little Rock
Planning Commission.
SECTION 3. Thai: 4hez change ill zoning classification
Coll' -emplated for West Mar'r.hem Auto, rdall is conditioned upon
obt.,lil i l)ri a final pinn s7pprovcl from the Planning Commission
Within the L• ilne .,,per. t r: ied by Article IX, Section V .101 of
the Code of or djjjr.t7GC'S.
SFCTXOM 4. ':!hint: the map. r.eferrecl to in Chapter 43-1 of
the Code of 4rdi.nnnces or the City of Little Rock, Arkansas,
and designated distract: map be and it is hereby amended to
the extint and in th- respects necessary to afEeet and
designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof.
SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall take effect. -and
be, in full 'force upon final approval of the plan by tyre '
Planning Commission.
PASSED: September 15, 1987
ATTEST:/,'Lr�ke,
�".�cl
City C Jane Czech Mayor Lottie Shackelford
FILED & RECOROLL
C ,age 67`56249 Lei ALS 31 1.4 0 31W
BUOFASSURANCE Grr --
'IPaGAs+�ct Cn�elRCwxcii�fii h
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESETS:
THAT, WHEREAS, J. Wpm Wa"r.w, G. 'Thomas Eisele and W. Martin Mete are vines of
the lands lying In the County of PuLUM. State Of Aakansas, dastxbad on the altacted 'Exhft M
and incorporated herein.
AND, WHEREAS, It Is desirab!e that all Of 1 W above-rele.-incad property be subdivided
into a lot;
NOW, THEREFORE. IARTNESSETK
THAT. WE, the Ovmsrs have mused sadd tract of bnd to be surveyed by White-Dwars S
Assodates, a Registered Prolessior►d Englraer and Rechftred Land Surveyor, respecOv ly. and
a Fiat thereof made which kUntt W by me M of LOT 5 WEST MARKHAM LAND ADDITION,
and dated 1997 stud by the sIgnature Of the Clr=R Cleric erhd ex-otiiCb
Recorder of Pulaski County, Arkansas, as Ins-trumern No. . end the Owner does
narety; make this BA of Asuwance. 87-56249
AN'D. thn Q,rat hcseby certifies is It has tzW off. platted. " Sutkvlded. and dm
hereby izyoff. plat. and subdivide said real asWa in geomdttncs with Bald plat. The lands
embraco In seat plat shall be former known as LOT 6 WEST MARKWJU LAND ADOr K
That an stops of ground spawn end 6mensioned an said pia! m rkad 'LMly Eanfiemant'
and 'Dralnags Eawrze7t° are rzaservaKC! tot tt;s use of the pubtic ertMea at Such U13ftles as
designated. and far draInago purposes rospertively, subject at an times to the prgW
authorldes and to Me eascmenl hor,:in mserred.
That an strips of ground shown and dl-menaloned on said plat and me lmd 'Cross
Easement" are fes -mod for flue mutual care', s and ingress W bb confla our to the OaS=-ant WA
shall remain clew of any obstruction at aN fumes.
That an strips of gtourd shown and dirrrensioned on said plat and marked `Electrical
Safety Easement' are reserved seed burdenod with full cvrrVzance withh reguta4iorta of 1!t!
National Electrical Safety Code In *!tact at the fte of eanstr Zion of any Slruc are. sign.
andror landscaping. Arkansas Pourer and Ugh!. or Ns succe'Msar, shad be nofilled prior to the
erection of any structure wdhin the ensemcnt for review and a Moval of cornpUnce wait
applicable fegutaflors.
The Ming of oft M of Assurance and pie for record in the Office of the Cir.M Clerk
and ex-0fficio Recorder of P&-,-c J County 9W be a va."d rstd cur:; 'a de: c y and &'u .cation
of the eanernants Shown on said ptaL
Hereafter. conveyance end dc=,ip zn of said tench by bt numtsr. Ls sihowi an sa'd pt L
shall be a proper and vs'fic font d frtian ihereot
The lot In Said subdIvision st•,ail be ruh4oct to the kNowing covonwd% b +Mil:
1. Said land wNfhin LOT 5 WEST MAWKhM LAID ADDITION " be held,
owned, and used In oa,;,pllsrrca eah tfhe zoning, s ion. lWWscVUng, rind elfin
ordinances of to City of Utte Rode as tfhey apptled b said WW at the time of
recording of this Instrument or as such ordinances may be amended from bete b
time to provide for less restrictive use. ProvWed however. under no
circumstaroe shaft a n:ar yard ce=cc be required or a�pticd to any of -;zld MM&
2. The h tum owner or owners of Lot 6 ahaN maintain clong or -. '=,ant b
the southern loll Itno as shown on the plat an eight (8) bet cpau;ua tenca untd
such tune as relief Thom fhb p wi;lon Is gr4rtod by the Planning Commission of
the City of Lkft Rook by application In compliance with aN regulations for
Xo1*g Prop".
S. Any and all eavenants, provislona, or restrictions set forth In this U of rc
Asaurisno may be amended, fn x%Ud, extended. clanged. or cancelled, in whole•nr:
In Pw% by a wrltlen instrument signsd and acknowledged by the owner of "J
land hereby platted and 00 provls'.arrs of such Instrument so execuled rhaU b4'
binding from and altar th tfaia It is duly Mod for record In Pulaski County;;;
%i
112
0 City of Little Rock _ _ Engineering Division
Department of 701 West Markham
Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
March 10, 1989
Mr. H. Bradley Walker
300 Riverside Building
2228 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR 72202
Re: West Markham Land Addition Fence Requirement
Dear Mr. Walker:
At its meeting on January 24, 1989, the Little Rock Planning
Commission voted to recommended to the City Board of
Directors, modification of the fence requirement along the
rear of this addition. On February 21, 1989, the Board of
Directors approved the proposed modification.
Please accept this letter as notice that this property must
be brought into compliance with the approved modification by
March 21, 1989, thirty (30) days from the Board of Directors
approval. The eight foot (8') board fence must be extended
from the southwest corner of the office building to the
southwest corner of the vehicular use area located on the
west side of the office building. Gates must be erected
between the south corners of the office building and the
ends of the fence to control pedestrian access.
The requirement for a fence behind the office building and
from the southwest corner of the vehicular use area located
west of the office building to the west corner of the
property was deleted by the Board of Directors.
If you have any questions, please call me at 371-4844.
Sincerely,
Kenny. Cott
Chief of Zoning & Signs
KS/ps
cc: Garland Street
Andy's of Arkansas
11,521 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72211
TO►�,�
I
AL. --w '.J ,
NAME:
T_n0AMTnh7.
M VN7 VT_nn V n .
H. Bradley Walker
2228 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR
Phone: 666-4316
666-4242
AREA:
West Markham Auto Mall
Short Form PCD (Z-2245-C)
Lot 1, West Markham Land
Addition to the City of
Little Rock
ARCHITECT:
Renshaw and Associates
Little Rock, AR
NO. OF LOTS: 1
FT. NEW STREET:
ZONING: "C-3" to PCD
PROPOSED USE: Auto Parts and Supply Mall
A. Proposal
(1) To provide a speciality shopping center, which
provides in one location, several high quality
"quick service" automotive retailers which offer
various automobile maintenance products and
services. N
(2) Two buildings with 10 to 13-units and a larger
building on 2.258 acres. Total square footage is
$25,000.
(3) 116 parking spaces.
B. Engineering Comments
(1) Show square footage of landscaped areas.
(2) Show floor elevations on buildings.
';YT-VL:i'^1` 1. T.".'�;. ._"..".._N tl:'=] ... 'sr .-.,".-,•.hm'".'a•r_nr.u�l-'. 1 ,'Hnn v";+-'Tvc,Y:�3.'+'s.
Z-2245-C - Continued
(3) Indicate erosion control design on south.
(4) Indicate an "exit only" sign on the western drive.
C. Issues/Legal/!technical/Design
(1) Revised site plan to indicate vicinity map, legal
description, and full dimensions on drives and
parking.
(2) Specify use group for Buildings A and B.
( 3 ) If service station is planned, needs to be
indicated on plan along with pump stations and
canopy.
(4) Applicant may be required to submit landscaping on
perimeter drive to City Beautiful Commission.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The Applicant submitted a revised site plan that addressed
some traffic concerns and changed the building in a
northeast corner. He agreed to submit more information on
the use groups proposed. Staff's recommendations -
approval, subject to comments made, plus: (1) no vehicle
access drives on the south side of the building parallel to
the creek, in order to reduce noise, and (2) architectural
treatment of roof and rear of building parallel to the
creeks so as to make it attractive and compatible with the
residential area to the south.
!
Srlt Q�I, •S.. .,r T24YlRR�a. r .�. r.. � � r �'1'L�" s•S :; IJJt:'�`�. .. .. _-. .. 'H9r.n :•r. .. .r r __�.. -y r_ ... w.-2 �::J �`!F �:��•c
Z-2245-C - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (6-30-87)
The applicant was present. The staff offered its
recommendation. Mr. Jim Daly and Mr. Brad Walker were
present representing the proposal. They offered their
comment on the staff recommendation which was an objection
to losing access for double loaded type auto uses. Mr.
Walker offered to build a fence to screen the rear area of
the buldings in lieu of the doors. A general discussion
then followed.
The Chairman then asked for objectors. There were four in
attendance. Mr. George Bowman, of Ashwood Road, discussed
the excavation; the unsightly developments along Markham
rearing on his neighborhood. The loss of trees to the City
flood and drainage project. Mr. Jeff Hoyt addressed his
concerns as being sound from this type of use. He offered
additional history. Mrs. Agness Beale, an Ashwood
resident, offered her concerns and a history of this area.
Mr. Robert Brown and Mr. Charles Basham were present
representing the property owner to the west. This property
was proposed for development and Mr. Brown stated their
interest as being in need -of cooperation on development of
the common access drive on the west boundary of this
proposal, plus building orientation and landscaping.
A lengthy general discussion followed revolving around
fences and height, number of rear garage doors, and use
mix. A motion was then made to approve the application
which motion included an 8-foot fence along the south
property line limiting the uses to the by -right and
conditional use in "C-3" except for auto repair garage, the
hours of operation to be limited to 7 a.m. through 7 p.m.,
and the garage doors on the rear of the building be limited
to eight. The motion failed by a vote of 4 ayes, 4 noes,
and 3 absent. The failure of the motion automatically
defers this matter to the next scheduled meeting,
August 11, 1987.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION:- (7-23-87)
There was no one present representing the application.
There was no discussion of the proposal.
Z-2245-C - Continued
Hall and reporting what was observed as a violation.
Mrs. Agness Beale and Mr. Bowman, residents of Birchwood,
then offered comments on the fence and perhaps some zoning
action that could commit the fence to the property.
A lengthy discussion then followed during which Mr. Basham
indicated he was reluctant to accept maintenance
responsibility for the fence. When asked, Mr. Walker could
not state who would have responsibility for permanent repair
or replacement of damaged fencing but that it could be
worked out. After further discussion of procedural matters
as to involving the sold sites and the commitments offered,
a motion was made. The motion was to approve the amended
Planned Commercial District application with these
conditions:
1. That the south wall of the main building be
limited to six overhead doors.
2. The six doors to have automatic closer devices
with a maximum three minute open time.
3. That the south property line of the entire
subdivision be provided with an eight -foot opaque
} wood fence and permanent maintenance. This
requirement to be resolved before submitting the
I,- application to the Board of Directors.
4. The uses to be limited to the "C-3" District use
group plus those uses characterized as auto
speciality shops from the "C-4" use group. These
include such as auto glass and muffler but exclude
engine rebuilding, paint, or body shops.
5. Normal business hours for the auto related are to
be 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
6. Designate the area along the west property line
used as common drive as a "No Parking" zone and so
marked on -site.
7. Limit to four the number Qf overhead doors on the
west building face adjacent to Mr. Basham's
development and the ,facade redesign.
�'r�`'`" • r . :2 :•L3�Tfn:roV T7' rw._; ^c: .•r, .. .._ ./"'•!.ihf.9AYJ 1•'v^ .r � r .. .cep. �_.. - — -va, ti sr • •,-.�--.....+_eu+x�ra.a aiv cr're�aw.
Z-2245-C - Continued
B. Revise the site plan to include -all of the
conditions.
9. Engineering Division requirements.
The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent,
1 open position.
0
r
r
.r
••. .r _ _.- -_a^-Tr_-1-rP rYllesb�r�r +•w.:.... r•r •.•..�u,:_,._-a'sa_.�•.••�••e>•.•�-r-r-.-�••..-_. �.• .•am.—vxo.-r. ..sr-.c,ne r�r err-�..•e-r. �.�a•ra :-.��lC�Sb
TV
�1
U)J ' .
-fiiX-::�
9AM )L.
0 C RZ, C IC,
t-- A
/ po&jcs L- 0 r
AAI [] , m G &a elf.. _-
' M1 LAuF c(_ T� _ L.� C—sT --ram
t ki k C-0 - I D t -L c F 55 .
z
6 k� Atd- 6r VWL6TCerT JkjHWO MLPE bVeS7ea
w
L -5
S ! kG ,05 .d
d Al L_-r + t at m -H,
iN-6- l.j
Cj - do
! v�
,5
--C-
AXb 7AC-
Tj115 IWPr �WELaP6D (A/WN /W Gr�,e6��,1TAN
dF 117dO,JsWwffJ Jig, Ouev r .efO ;MT ?*—
' 1.s yd-�
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501) 666-4242
September 15, 1987
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
City Hall
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application
This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the
above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as
proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will
construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year
from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request.
Sincerely yours,
H. Bradley Walker
Agent for Property Owners
HBW:mtk
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501)666-4242
September 15, 1987
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
City Hall
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application
This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the
above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as
proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will
construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year
from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request.
Sincerely yours,
H. Bradley Walker
Agent for Property Owners
HBW:mtk
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501)666-4242
September 15, 1987
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
City Hall
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application
This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the
above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as
proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will
construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year
from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request.
Sincerely yours,
H. Bradley Walker
Agent for Property Owners
HBW:mtk
I� :Aty of Little Rock
I Office of
,Comprehensive
�., Planning
January 30, 1989
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Mr. H. Bradley Walker
2228 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR 72202
Subject: West Markham Land Addition fence requirement
Dear Mr. Walker:
At its meeting on January 24, 1989, the Little Rock Planning
Commission voted to recommend to the City Board of Directors
modification of the fence requirement along the rear of this
addition. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City
Board for its meeting on February 21, 1989. This is
required due to the fence commitment being a part of a
Planned Unit Development authorization.
If you have questions concerning this matter, do not
hesitate to call my office.
Very my yours,
R IC
Current Planning Manager
RW:gIs
cc: Mr. George Bowman
Mrs. Agness Beale
0 City of Little Rock Engineering Division
Department of 701 West Markham
Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 24, 1989
TO: Gary Greeson, Director of Comprehensive Planning
FROM: Don McChesney, City Engineer j�
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Agenda Ite—m�`�12�, January 24, 1989
Fence Waiver Request - Andy's Restaurants
Office Building, 11521 West Markham Street
The fencing which is the subject of this waiver request has been relied
on as a very important and necessary part of the development of this
property with regard to screening the use from the residential area
to the south.
The landscape code would normally impose a requirement for a six (6) foot
high opaque screen between all vehicular use areas and any adjacent
residential property. This would certainly be the spirit and intent of
the landscape code in this particular situation. The approved landscape
plan for the subject property did show proposed construction of an eight
(8) foot high fence all the way to the west terminus of the property.
Technically, there is an intervening strip of property zoned C-3 between
the West Markham Land Addition and the residential property to the south,
which would void the screening requirement. Since this strip of land is
largely drainage easement and otherwise undevelopable, no other opportunity
for screening in conjunction with future development exists.
The Environmental Codes staff has worked closely with the development
of this property and has granted some alternative landscaping arrangements
because of some of the physical characteristics of the sites.
In view of the intensity of the development of this specific property
and staff concern, as well as opposition of some neighborhood residents,
I recommend denial of the requested waiver.
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501) 666-4242
January 10, 1989
Mr. Richard Wood
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition
Dear Richard:
I appreciate your confirmation of the deferral on the West Markham additional fence
issue. I look forward to resolving the matter on January 24.
Cordially yours,
r'
r
H. ro ley Walker
HBO, :mtk
M
\/E 11
JAN 12 1989
otCity of Little Rock
Office of 723 West Markham
Comprehensive Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Planning
January 5, 1989
Mr. H. Bradley Walker
Walker Real Estate
300 Riverside Building
2228 Cottondale Lane
Little Rock, AR 72202
Re: West Markham Land Addition
Dear Mr. Walker:
The Little Rock Planning Commission, at its meeting on
January 3, 1989, deferred action on the West Markham Land
Addition fence issue. This matter has be reset for
January 24th at 1:00 p.m. in the Board of Directors'
Chambers, City Hall. The other interested parties in this
matter have been advised of the new hearing date.
Therefore, no follow-up on your part will be required.
If additional information is required, I will contact you at
a later date.
Very truly yours,
ICHARD WOOD
Current Planning Manager
RW:gls
cc: Case File
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501) 666-4242
December 14, 1988
Mr. Richard Wood
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition
Dear Mr. Wood:
Please recall my letter of November 14, 1988, in connection with a review by the Planning Commission
of improvements made in the above referenced development. Today when we checked on the date for
this review, we were made aware that it is scheduled for January 3, 1989. We would ask that the
matter be deferred until a date after January 16, 1989.
Mr. Garland Streett, president of Andy's of Arkansas, is the property owner most concerned with the
final resolution of this matter. Mr. Streett would like to be present at the commission's review, and he
will be out of town through January 16, 1989.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Unless I hear from you otherwise, I will assume that
the item is deferred and you will notify us in writing of any further scheduling on the commission's
agenda.
Cordially yours,
ey Walker
HBW:mtk
cc: Mr. George Bowman
Garland Streett
Don McChesney
Jim Hathcock
DEC 15 1988
t
City of Little Rock
Office of 723 West Markham
Comprehensive Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Planning
November 29, 1988
Mr. George Bowman
11700 Ashwood Drive
Little Rock, AR 72211
Re: Screening fence along Rock Creek adjacent to the Andy's
office and restaurant
Dear Mr. Bowman:
The purpose of this communication is to provide notice of
appeal by Mr. Bradley Walker of the requirement for
placement of fence along Rock Creek. Mr. Walker and the
owner of the Andy's restaurant have determined that they
desire to provide fencing in a form inconsistent with that
approved by the City. The Planning Commission will hear
this appeal at its public hearing at 1:00 p.m. on January
1989. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors'
Chambers, Second Floor, Little Rock City Hall. This item,
due to its nature, will be one of the latter items on that
Public Hearing agenda. Therefore, I cannot provide a
specific time of day that the matter will be discussed. I
would recommend your attendance at 1:00 p.m.
If you require further conversation or information on this
subject, do not hesitate to call.
Sinc ely,
Richard Wood 1�
Current Planning Manager
RW:gIs
cc: Case File
Don McChesney
Ken Scott
an
a
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2225 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501) 666-4242
November 14, 1988
Mr. Richard Wood
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition
Dear Richard:
It has been called to my attention that some property owners wish to require the extension of the
fencing related to the project. It is our belief that the improvements made are preferable and in
the best interests of the city as a whole. In that regard, we would request that the Planning
Commission review the commitment made in connection with fencing of the property.
I would welcome the scheduling at the convenience of the staff and the commission and await
hearing from you in that regard.
Cordially yours,
le- A - -
FF'Pfadley Walker
HBW:mtk
cc: Mr. George Bowman
Garland Streett
Don McChesney
Jim Hathcock
WALKER REAL ESTATE
300 RIVERSIDE BLDG.
2228 COTTONDALE LANE
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202
(501)666-4242
September 15, 1987
Office of Comprehensive Planning
City of Little Rock
City Hall
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: West Markham Land Addition Lot 1 PCD Application
This letter is to confirm that on approval by the City of Little Rock and the City Board of the
above referenced re -zoning request and in the event construction proceeds on the Auto Mall as
proposed on lot 1 of the West Markham Land Addition, the current property owners will
construct an 8 foot high wooden fence along the length of the rear property line within one year
from the date of the ordinance approving the re -zoning request.
Sincerely yours,
H. Bradley Walker
Agent for Property Owners
HUvV:mtk
5' CaR6 curs \
W/TH QQ'DR/t/EW.�rS
NI
Ama is
'QO
wA Esr jqo,e)q,4,4f
AapYs {cSTAvRAwT
ISS►� OS�'
u
�s.S' /7s' /25" izo /go•
� �
At SIN
72��IDENcc-
j/7dd ds14&dVP U .
��►:�♦ WESTMA,P,(�flgM LAND qDD/T/CbV
NORTH
2
d mPY S LcsTAv Rt-W T
IVA")gA,41
now
71-1/s ..
Ahr
5 GJRB C✓TS � ,v1
wiry 40 �oRiVEwarS �-S� /vliq l� /�/�f-v "/ �%��E%
isyy olu
Na
1 fad
Avo is
aces
�5.
-
?
yB. \
yA. 38. \
3A. a
IA.
Atj
-a s�"rOon
�1
p/2
TES.ornrC.G
//74d ,4S�r..fU)0'.I "0/ .
����� w�sTM�,�rgM�wo goo�rrc�v
MonrN
2
Tis ..
PZAr
i
V)
� GURB C!?S
w�rfl 4D o e/�Eways WET — /' A R K gAAv `S7REET'
ISyy,Qy�
•� 4!00 S a r' i29' �s' /79.5' /75' /.2S' /10'
3A.
Z6,
�a Zit
Preliminary Plat - AERZ,17T
/8o,
W,56771VRO" CANP q4W/r1W
/ZEWIS�o -V-50ie7 4
SUBDIVISION DATE P
ITEM NO. _ FILE NO. S Z& Z2-?.Z4 S- C
NAME: U ►Eil A& c9=!AA—J-tl �, VA G-b r>
LOCATION: Itlf!�-5dLh�i4A4. /ST Jan r 5vi S/DF
DEVELOPER ENGINEER
NAME:
STREET ADDRESS 704 eWty- 51fdc
CITY/STATE/ZIP :22
TELEPHONE NO. _ . 2
AREA NUMBER OF LOTS
1
FT. NEW STREET
ZONING PRGPOSED USES
PLANNING DISTRICT
CENSUS TRACT
YAK M10ES--MUSS-TE-D :
' cx��sTS i V I �7-w 0 F -0 6-� AL-0Al G 5vr[74 APeA-ry'
b,VC-- e4w.160- (, ploys nmr-s AAr'rW1,Wl( rr-Alcc ram- 6,gVc,74(.
4.)
REGISTRATION FORM._
FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
This card can be picked up at any time in the City
Planning Offige. Room 305, City Hallc Little Rock.
I wish to speak about Item # ____. on the Agenda.
I am opposed
Nam
Add
for '' Item #
Telephone
Date
REGISTRATION FORM
FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
This card can be picked up at any time in the City
Room 305x City Hall, Little Roc�.
I wish to speak about Item # on the Agenda.
I am opposed for Item #'� .
Name
Address -f
Telephone
r ^ 4 >
Date----CS�/L]/f
J
REGISTRATION FORM
FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
This card can be picked up at any time in the City
Planning i Roo fl / H Rock
I wish to speak about Item # ` C91 on the Agenda.
I am opposed
r.
Name l�
Address
Date / C9- /"74 `~
for Item #
Telephone
S' GJR6 curs
wires 40'DRIVEL(/A)P'
�c
No
AlIDy5
3
W967-1V91F #, 4h1
his
PL,4T H
i
A Nrr(s Pw3rA,'a;AIT
s L/q E'ST M.4 R fCfIAM STREET
;7,5' '16' /07.s' i %q. ' 75' —25-
in 3A.
,r � �
W. MAMWAIAM
��
r ANDY a° OFFICE i PKNG
r3i/ZCe-/WOO® ADDN.
Wes � lWa *-kA Anq( At(Wt 7i6
JrAl�- Fence /w��"aADn
NORTH
um
QKKI�
F&jc� im
PLAC F—
w