HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0240 Staff AnalysisJune 30, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3
NAME: Coronda Heights
LOCATION: West of and adjacent to
- St. Charles
DEVELOPER: ENGINEER:
Paul Mooser White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
14900 High Point Dr. 401 Victory Street
Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR 72201
Telephone No. 374-1666
AREA: 37.7360 acres NO. OF LOTS: 112 FT. NEW STREET: 5700
ZONING: "R--2 11
PROPOSED USES: "R-2"
A. Existinq Conditions
A residential area that is developing as single
family. The Parkway Village Retirement Center is
located to the south of the site and St. Charles
Subdivision to the east and northeast.
B. Proposal
(1) To plat 37.7360 areas into 112 lots and 5700 feet
new street for single family use.
C. Issues
(1) Thirty (30) foot building line needed on
Corondolet.
(2) Source of right-of-way on perimeter of ownership.
(3) Give more information regarding the relationship
between this Parkway Village and the extension of
Shelton Drive to the south. May be collector. If
so, 30-foot building line is needed.
(4) Indicate access to Lot 1.
(5) Thirty (30) foot building line on Corondolet.
June 30, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3- Continued
(6) Justify design on Lots 341 and Lot 1.
(7) Indicate sidewalks on Shelton.
(8) Relationship of this site,to Chenal Valley Plan.
(9) See staff for technical deficiencies on plat.
(10) Notices required for abutting acreage 2.5 acres or
greater.
D. Engineerinq Comments
(1) Street name changes - Stratford Lane to Stratford
Circle and it should lie north of Corondolet Drive
only; and Winsted Drive to Winsted Court and runs
south off Corondolet Drive to end of cul-de-sac.
(2) Show major and minor drainage ways.
(3) Excavation ordinance requirements - stormwater,
volume calculations, and grading plan.
(4) Eliminate numerous four-way stops.
(5) Eliminate buttons, staff prefers hammerheads.
(6) Redesign intersection of Winsted and Shelton
(900).
(7) Redesign northwest portion of plat to provide a
cul-de-sac on Stratford Lane and no intersection
at Stratford Lane and Corondolet.
E. Staff Recommendation
Reserved, until additional information is submitted.
Staff does not oppose proposed development, but is
concerned about the relationship of this project's
future and existing development in the area, as it
relates to the traffic flow and design. The
relationship of this submission to the recently
approved Chenal Valley plan may be crucial.
June 30, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 3 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The Applicant responded to the issues stated by staff as
follows:
1. Agreed to provide 30-foot building line.
2. Explain that rights -of -way will be closed.
3. Explain that Shelton has been extended to provide
access to a small paper plat. The Owner did not
want it to tie into Parkway Place because of the
two different types of residential uses.
4-6. Explain that there would be a land swap to square
up Lots 341 and 1. Agreed to note this on the
plat.
7. Stated that Shelton would be a cul-de-sac.
8. Explain that the Chenal Valley Plan provides a
north/south arterial to the west.
9-10. Agreed to comply as asked. He also agreed to
comply with Engineering Comments and to get with
Traffic concerning the provision of buttons or
hammerheads and to file a closed petition for the
perimeter rights -of -way.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (6-30-87)
The applicant was present. The staff reported that it has
determined the plat to be in conformance with the Committee
Review comments. After a brief discussion, a motion was
made to approve the plat. The motion passed by a vote of 10
ayes, 0 noes, and 1 absent.