HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0238-H Staff AnalysisMEETING_DATE: May 17, 1988
CASE NO.i Z-5005
REQUEST: To approve a "PRD" for a single family
small lot development.
LOCATION: East of 5506 Edgewood Rd.
OWNEAPPLICANT David Scruggs
EXISTING STATDS-, Vacant lot
PROPOSED USE: New single family construction
STAFF RECOMMENDATION,;_
Denial based on overbuilding lot, precedent setting, less
than lot width standard in area.
PLANNING COMMISSION_RECOMMENDATION=
Approval subject to:
1) A 6 ft. brick wall around the pool area.
2) Access to pool only from the house and front of
lot.
3) Delete the 15 ft. building line for carport.
RECOMMENDATION -FORWARDED WITH:
OBJECTORS: One person
7 Ayes, 0 Nayes, 3 Absent,
1 abstain (Richard Massie)
-TTaUu .
Prospect. Terrace "Short -Form"
PRD (Z-5005)
LOCATION: East of 5506 Edgewood
APPLICANT: Mr. David Scruggs
5506 Edgewood
Little Rock, AR
V AT!'_ T ATV V D .
Pat McGetrick
P.O. Box 22408
Little Rock, AR 72221
AREA: 6,266 sq. ft. NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW ST.: 0
A. Proposal/Request
1. To construct a 2,000 square foot, two-story,
single family home on a lot that contains 6,266
square feet.
2. The construction of a swimming pool in the rear.
B. Existing Conditions
This site is located in a single family area in one of
the older neighborhoods of the City.
C. Issues/Discussion/Legal/Technical/Design
1. Depart from usual lot size for single lot, single
family development.
2. Proposal overbuilds lot.
3. May set precedent for other requests to divide
lots. This could create a congested residential
environment.
Z-5O05 -` Continued
D. Engineering Comments
1. Twelve -foot drive appears narrow, may cause
parking on -street.
2. Five-foot additional right -of. -way dedication
required..
E. Staff Recommendation
Denial based on staff_'s comments.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The engineer agreed to widen the driveway and dedicate the
requested five feet.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
There were objectors present. The application was
represented by Mr. David Scruggs.
Mr. Scruggs made a presentation. He offered a petition
with 14 signatures of support for his application. He
described his house and pool, the dimensions, height and
relationship to neighbors.
Mrs. Carolyn Gluckman was present to question the project.
She stated that she had not been _given the same information
about this case earlier and only at this meeting did she
receive a complete picture. She objected to the two-story
construction with windows. Several Commissioners objected
to the 15' carport setback.
After a brief discussion involvinq the several parties, a
motion was made to approve the PUD subject to provision of:
Z-15"n'05 Continued
(1) Six-foot brick wall around the deck and pool,
(2) Access only from the house in front of the lot,
(3) Delete the 15' carport line.
A motion .passed . by a vote. of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent,
1 abstaining, Richard Massie.
SUBDIVISION AGENDA FORMS
MEETINGfDAT
ITEM # 1 f/(;'�'S v -e c _��
A. PROPf05AL RE UEST: 44
eci 44i
�J
T�e rots trod cita A Ov
C
/ ON -I l P- t° r( r" V
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
areA i r one d-�
C. ISSUESIDISCUSSION LEGAL TECHNICAL DESIGN
LI -pe Ar-l_ �rarv� LAS(A Sr2e far ���n�� _l o'��.
-e
(3)
roc �,� �� � a��e r
S
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: 6�1
r � -ram , �
E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
P-e V\ 1, q I )bGSe4An S Co
J