The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutS-1042-HH Staff AnalysisAugust 26, 2004 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: S-1042-HH NAME: The Villages of Wellington Phase XII Revised Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Located on the South West corner of Wellington Village Road and Bristol Court DEVELOPER: Winrock Development Company 2222 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR 72203 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates #24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 53.73 acres CURRENT ZONING PLANNING DISTRICT: CENSUS TRACT: NUMBER OF LOTS: 158 R-2, R-3 and MF-6 19 42.10 VARIANCESMAIVERS REQUESTED: FT. NEW STREET: 7,720 LF 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. 3. A variance to not require sidewalk placement along Yorkshire Lane. 4. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 6. A variance to allow a 25-foot building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 7. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building line adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1042-HH A. PROPOSAUREQUEST: The property contains 53.7 acres and is located south of Wellington Village Road and west of Wellington Woods Drive. The property will be subdivided into 158 Single-family lots. Phase I and III are proposed as patio style lots. The average lot size proposed in these phases will be 60-feet by 120-feet. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a reduced side yard setback and a reduced rear yard setback for these lots. The setback is proposed as five feet to allow for additional buildable area on each of these lots. Phase II, IV and V are proposed as medium size lots similar to those previously developed to the east. Average lot sizes in these phases will be 80-feet by 130- feet. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced front building line along a collector street. The applicant has indicated a 25-foot front building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24 and Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. The applicant is requesting variances from the Master Street Plan related to the proposed plat area. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street and a variance to not require sidewalk placement along Yorkshire Lane. Storm water detention is provided in the existing lake to the south. This lake was constructed several years ago by Winrock Development as an amenity for the development, but also as a regional storm water detention facility for this drainage basin. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is vacant and tree covered with slightly rolling hills to steep grades. The area to the west is vacant and was formerly the pasture for the Shackleford Dairy. The area was recently rezoned to R-2, Single-family and MF-6. The area to the east of the site is developing with single-family homes similar in lot size to the applicant's request. The area directly north has been preliminary platted as Wellington Village Phase XI and infrastructure improvements are currently underway. 2 August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: S-1042-HH C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from the area residents. The St. Charles Neighborhood Association, the Parkway Place Property Owners Association and all abutting property owners were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A sidewalk would be required on Durham Loop since it exceeds the maximum length of 1500-feet for a minor residential street. The minimum curve radius should be 150-feet. Likewise for the Yorkshire Drive and Waterford Lane loop streets. 2. Sidewalk should also be provided for Yorkshire Lane. 3. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: Approved as submitted. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. Water main extensions will be required in order to provide service to this property. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3752 for additional information. 3 August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 _(Cont.) _ _ _ FILE NO.: S-1042-HH County Planning: No comment. CATA: No comment received. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planninq Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (August 5, 2004) Mr. Joe White and Mr. Doug McNeil were present representing the request. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a revised plan to staff on August 4, 2004 so some of the indicated comments were no longer valid. Staff stated there were comments still outstanding which would need to be addressed. Staff requested the applicant provide a 30-foot building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road per the Subdivision Ordinance for single-family residences abutting a collector street. Staff stated a variance would be required to allow the indicated 25-foot building line. Staff stated a portion of the property was currently zoned MF-6 and R-3. Staff stated the applicant would need to seek a rezoning of the non-R-2 zoned site prior to final platting. Commissioner Rector questioned the street naming configuration. He stated the street names were confusing when the same name was used multiple times. Mr. White stated 911 would allow two variations of the same street name. Mr. Rector stated more than one caused confusion. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated a sidewalk along Durham Loop would be required since the street exceeded the maximum length for a minor residential street. Staff also noted sidewalks would be required on Yorkshire Lane, Yorkshire Drive and Waterford Lane. Staff noted comments from the other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them individually for additional clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the August 5, 2004 Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has requested a variance to allow a 25-foot platted building line adjacent to a 0 August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH collector street for five of the proposed lots. Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23 have a 25-foot front building line indicated on the proposed preliminary plat. The Subdivision Ordinance typically requires a front building line adjacent to a collector street to be 30-feet. The applicant has indicated justification for a reduced building line which states the lots to the east were also approved with a 25-foot building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road and the developer wishes to continue the established building setback. Staff is supportive of this request. The applicant has also indicated a rezoning request will be filed if and when the proposed preliminary plat is approved. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request to postpone the rezoning request until after plat approval but prior to final platting. The applicant has not changed the names of streets and has indicated three street names beginning with the same primary name; Yorkshire Lane, Drive and Loop. Staff recommends the applicant work with staff to resolve this issue prior to final platting. The applicant has requested sidewalks not be required along Yorkshire Lane. Staff is not supportive of this request. Staff recommends the sidewalk be put in place per the Master Street Plan to allow pedestrian connectivity through the neighborhood. The applicant has requested Durham Court be allowed to exceed the maximum length for a cul-de-sac. The applicant has indicated the street at approximately 960 feet. The ordinance typically requires cul-de-sac streets not exceed a maximum length of 750 feet. Staff is supportive of allow the increased street length. The applicant has indicated a cul-de-sac with a proper radius to allow service vehicles to turn -around and exit. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet), a variance to allow a five foot side yard setback and a variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) for Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. The applicant has indicated these lots will be developed as garden style homes. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request. Staff feels the development of the mixture of housing types in the area should enhance the neighborhood. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a 15-foot front building line adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. The applicant has indicated in these locations grades are steep and the allowance of a reduced building line would allow for more buildable area. Staff is supportive of this request. The applicant has indicated the development will be constructed in three phases. Lots 1 — 9 Block 24, Lots 46 — 64 Block 23 and Lots 1 — 18 Block 21 will be developed in the first phase. Lots 1 — 15 Block 23, Lots 1 — 19 Block 22, Lots 1 — 35 Block 21 and Lot 1 Block 25 will be developed in the second phase and Lots 4 August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 Cont. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH 16 — 45 Block 23 and Lots 2 — 17 Block 25 will be developed in the final phase. The applicant has indicated Tracts A — E as a part of the proposed preliminary plat. According to the applicant the property owners association will maintain ownership and maintenance of the indicated tracts. Staff is supportive of the applicant's proposed phasing plan. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request and the applicant requested variances. Staff feels the proposed preliminary plat will have minimal adverse impact on the adjoining properties. The development of the proposed subdivision with various lot sizes and proposed housing types should add to diversity in the area. To Staff's knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the above report. Staff recommends the applicant rezone the properties contained within the proposed preliminary plat currently zoned R-3 and MF-6 prior to final platting of the proposed subdivision. Staff recommends approval of the following requesting variances: 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. 3. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 4. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a 25-foot front building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 6. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building adjacent to the proposed cul-de- sac streets. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 26, 2004) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the above report. 0 August 26, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH Staff also presented a recommendation the applicant rezone the properties contained within the proposed preliminary plat currently zoned R-3 and MF-6 prior to final platting of the proposed subdivision. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the following requested variances: 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. 3. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 4. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a 25-foot front building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 6. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion to place the item for inclusion on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 7 ITEM NO.: 2 R-1042-HH) `� r _"S' LOCATION: located on the SW corner of Wellington Village Roac[ and Bristol Court "J- t'1" d 4� FILE N NAME: The Villages of Wellington Phase XII Revised Preliminary Plat ')Planning Staff Comments: 1. Provide notification of abutting property owners of the site, complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. 2. Provide a 30-foot building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road per ordinance requirement (residential lots abutting a collector street). 3. Label the street right-of-way width for Wellington Village Road. 4. Indicate in the general notes section the lots proposed with a reduced front building line and a reduced side yard setback. 5. Provide in the general notes section lots to be developed in each phase. 6. Rezone the areas indicated as R-3 and MF-6 to R-2, Single-family. Variance/Waivers 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) on Lots 1 — 36 Block 21 and Lots 1 — 29 Block 22. 2. A variance to allow Durham Loop to develop as a minor residential street. 3. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 36 Block 21 and Lots 1 — 29 Block 22. Public Works. 1. A sidewalk would be required on Durham Loop since it exceeds the maximum length of 1500-feet for a minor residential street. The minimum curve radius should be 150-feet. Likewise for the Yorkshare Drive and Waterford Lane loop streets. 2. Sidewalk should also be provided for Yarkshare Lane. 3. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy- Approved as submitted. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. Water main extensions will be required in order to provide service to this property. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3752 for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: No comment received. Plannina Division: No comment. Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plan (to include the additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, August 11, 2004. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH NAME: The Villages of Wellington Phase XII Revised Preliminary Plat LOCATION: Located on the South West corner of Wellington Village Road and Bristol Court DEVELOPER: Winrock Development Company 2222 Cottondale Lane Little Rock, AR 72203 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates #24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 53.73 acres CURRENT ZONING: PLANNING DISTRICT: NUMBER OF LOTS: 158 R-2, R-3 and MF-6 19 CENSUS TRACT: 42.10 VARIANCESNVAIVERS REQUESTED: FT. NEW STREET: 7,720 LF 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. 3. A variance to not require sidewalk placement along Yorkshire Lane. 4. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 6. A variance to allow a 25-foot building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 7. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building line adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The property contains 53.7 acres and is located south of Wellington Village Road and west of Wellington Woods Drive. The property will be subdivided into 158 Single-family lots. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH Cont. Phase I and III are proposed as patio style lots. The average lot size proposed in these phases will be 60-feet by 120-feet. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a reduced side yard setback and a reduced rear yard setback for these lots. The setback is proposed as five feet to allow for additional buildable area on each of these lots. Phase II, IV and V are proposed as medium size lots similar to those previously developed to the east. Average lot sizes in these phases will be 80-feet by 130- feet. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced front building line along a collector street. The applicant has indicated a 25-foot front building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24 and Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. The applicant is requesting variances from the Master Street Plan related to the proposed plat area. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street and a variance to not require sidewalk placement along Yorkshire Lane. Storm water detention is provided in the existing lake to the south. This lake was constructed several years ago by Winrock Development as an amenity for the development, but also as a regional storm water detention facility for this drainage basin. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is vacant and tree covered with slightly rolling hills to steep grades. The area to the west is vacant and was formerly the pasture for the Shackleford Dairy. The area was recently rezoned to R-2, Single-family and MF-6. The area to the east of the site is developing with single-family homes similar in lot size to the applicant's request. The area directly north has been preliminary platted as Wellington Village Phase XI and infrastructure improvements are currently underway. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from the area residents. The St. Charles Neighborhood Association, the Parkway Place Property Owners Association and all abutting property owners were notified of the Public Hearing. 2 FILE NO.: S-1042-HH (Cont. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. A sidewalk would be required on Durham Loop since it exceeds the maximum length of 1500-feet for a minor residential street. The minimum curve radius should be 150-feet. Likewise for the Yorkshire Drive and Waterford Lane loop streets. 2. Sidewalk should also be provided for Yorkshire Lane. 3. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required with easements if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: Approved as submitted. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all meter connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. Water main extensions will be required in order to provide service to this property. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3752 for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: No comment received. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: No comment. W FILE NO.: S-1042-HH (Cont. Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (August 5, 2004) Mr. Joe White and Mr. Doug McNeil were present representing the request. Staff stated the applicant had submitted a revised plan to staff on August 4, 2004 so some of the indicated comments were no longer valid. Staff stated there were comments still outstanding which would need to be addressed. Staff requested the applicant provide a 30-foot building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road per the Subdivision Ordinance for single-family residences abutting a collector street. Staff stated a variance would be required to allow the indicated 25-foot building line. Staff stated a portion of the property was currently zoned MF-6 and R-3. Staff stated the applicant would need to seek a rezoning of the non-R-2 zoned site prior to final platting. Commissioner Rector questioned the street naming configuration. He stated the street names were confusing when the same name was used multiple times. Mr. White stated 911 would allow two variations of the same street name. Mr. Rector stated more than one caused confusion. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated a sidewalk along Durham Loop would be required since the street exceeded the maximum length for a minor residential street. Staff also noted sidewalks would be required on Yorkshire Lane, Yorkshire Drive and Waterford Lane. Staff noted comments from the other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them individually for additional clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the August 5, 2004 Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has requested a variance to allow a 25-foot platted building line adjacent to a collector street for five of the proposed lots. Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23 have a 25-foot front building line indicated on the proposed preliminary plat. The Subdivision Ordinance typically requires a front building line adjacent to a collector street to be 30-feet. The applicant has indicated justification for a reduced building line which states the lots to the east were also approved with a 25-foot building line adjacent to Wellington Village Road and the developer wishes to continue the established building setback. Staff is supportive of this request. 4 FILE NO.: S-1042-HH (Cont. The applicant has also indicated a rezoning request will be filed if and when the proposed preliminary plat is approved. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request to postpone the rezoning request until after plat approval but prior to final platting. The applicant has not changed the names of streets and has indicated three street names beginning with the same primary name; Yorkshire Lane, Drive and Loop. Staff recommends the applicant work with staff to resolve this issue prior to final platting. The applicant has requested sidewalks not be required along Yorkshire Lane. Staff is not supportive of this request. Staff recommends the sidewalk be put in place per the Master Street Plan to allow pedestrian connectivity through the neighborhood. The applicant has requested Durham Court be allowed to exceed the maximum length for a cul-de-sac. The applicant has indicated the street at approximately 960 feet. The ordinance typically requires cul-de-sac streets not exceed a maximum length of 750 feet. Staff is supportive of allow the increased street length. The applicant has indicated a cul-de-sac with a proper radius to allow service vehicles to turn -around and exit. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet), a variance to allow a five foot side yard setback and a variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) for Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. The applicant has indicated these lots will be developed as garden style homes. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request. Staff feels the development of the mixture of housing types in the area should enhance the neighborhood. The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow a 15-foot front building line adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. The applicant has indicated in these locations grades are steep and the allowance of a reduced building line would allow for more buildable area. Staff is supportive of this request. The applicant has indicated the development will be constructed in three phases. Lots 1 — 9 Block 24, Lots 46 — 64 Block 23 and Lots 1 — 18 Block 21 will be developed in the first phase. Lots 1 — 15 Block 23, Lots 1 — 19 Block 22, Lots 1 — 35 Block 21 and Lot 1 Block 25 will be developed in the second phase and Lots 16 — 45 Block 23 and Lots 2 — 17 Block 25 will be developed in the final phase. The applicant has indicated Tracts A — E as a part of the proposed preliminary plat. According to the applicant the property owners association will maintain ownership and maintenance of the indicated tracts. Staff is supportive of the applicant's proposed phasing plan. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request and the applicant requested variances. Staff feels the proposed preliminary plat will have minimal adverse 5 FILE NO.: S-1042-HH (Cont. impact on the adjoining properties. The development of the proposed subdivision with various lot sizes and proposed housing types should add to diversity in the area. To Staffs knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the above report. Staff recommends the applicant rezone the properties contained within the proposed preliminary plat currently zoned R-3 and MF-6 prior to final platting of the proposed subdivision. Staff recommends approval of the following requesting variances: 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. 3. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 4. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a 25-foot front building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 6. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building adjacent to the proposed cul-de- sac streets. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 26, 2004) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the above report. Staff also presented a recommendation the applicant rezone the properties contained within the proposed preliminary plat currently zoned R-3 and MF-6 prior to final platting of the proposed subdivision. Staff presented a recommendation of approval of the following requested variances: 1. A variance to allow a reduced front building line (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 2. A variance to allow Durham Court to exceed the maximum length of a minor residential street. FILE NO.: S-1042-HH (Cont. 3. A variance to allow a five foot side yard setback on Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 4. A variance to allow a reduced rear yard setback (20-feet) Lots 1 — 35 Block 21. 5. A variance to allow a 25-foot front building along Wellington Village Road for Lots 1, 8 and 9 Block 24, Lot 1 Block 22 and Lot 64 Block 23. 6. A variance to allow a 15-foot front building adjacent to the proposed cul-de-sac streets. There was no further discussion of the item. The chair entertained a motion to place the item for inclusion on the consent agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. ►/