HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-1042-A Staff AnalysisNovember 29, 1994
ITEM NO.: 2 FILE ND • S-1042-A
NAME: THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, PHASE 3 -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: North of and beyond the present end of Loyola Dr.
DEVELOPER:
ENGINEER:
WINROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
P. O. Box 8080 401 S. Victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72203 Little Rock, AR 72201
663-5340 374-1666
AREA: 23.8 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 59 FT. NEW STREET: 2,900
ZONING: R-2, MF-6, PROPOSED USES: Single -Family Residential
MF-18, & OS
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
LENS S TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REOUESTED: Waiver from the prohibition of pipestem
lots for Lot 11, Phase 3A.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes a preliminary plat for the subdivision of
a 23.8 acre tract, creating 59 single-family residential lots
along 2,900 feet of new streets. Sidewalks are proposed to be
constructed along both the collector street, Loyola Drive, and
the standard residential street, Wetherborne Dr. One lot, Lot 11
in Phase 3A, is proposed to be a pipestem lot.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Approval by the Planning Commission of a preliminary plat is
requested. Review by the Planning Commission and approval
by the Board of Directors is sought for a waiver from the
Subdivision Regulation which prohibits the creation of
pipestem lots, and permit one pipestem lot for Lot 11, Phase
3A.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped, and is wooded. The topography
rises from an elevation of approximately 550 feet, MSL (Mean
Sea Level) along the east boundary of the site, to over 660
feet, MSL along the west boundary of the subdivision.
Bounding the tract to the south is a phase of the St.
November 29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Continued) FILE NO.: 5-1042-A
Charles Subdivision which is currently being developed, and
Loyola Dr. extends northward into the proposed subdivision
from St. Charles Subdivision. To the north, east, and west
are large areas of undeveloped land.
The site is currently predominantly zoned R-2; however,
there are areas within the boundary which are zoned MF-6,
MF-18, and OS.
C. ENGINEER_I_NG/UTILITY COMMENTS:
11
Public Works comments that: 1) the grades indicated on
certain streets exceed the maximum permitted by Code; 2) a
sketch grading and drainage plan, meeting the requirements
of Sec. 29-186, is required, and a NPDES permit will be
required; 3) sidewalks, per the Master Street Plan, are to
be shown on the plat; 4) street plans, stormwater detention,
and boundary survey requirements will be required. The
Public Works staff objects to the pipestem lot waiver which
is requested, but states that if a pipestem waiver is
granted, the pipestem should be a minimum width of 30 feet
in order to be able to construct a driveway with aprons, and
have room for a mailbox within the frontage area of the lot.
Water Works comments that water main extensions will be
required. An acreage charge of $300 per acre applies in
this area, in addition to the normal charges.
Wastewater comments that sewer main extensions, with
easements, will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. comments that a 20 foot
easement will be required along the north -south boundary at
the southwest corner of the plat.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. approved the submittal without
comment.
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. comments that easements will
be required at the perimeter of the plat area, as well as at
critical lot lines.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
D. ISSUES LEGATE TECHNICAL DESIGN:
Section 31-232(g) states that pipestem lots shall be
prohibited in residential subdivisions. One lot, Lot 11 of
Phase 3A, is proposed to be a pipestem lot; therefore, a
waiver of this prohibition will be required.
2
November 29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2(Continued) FILE NO.: S-1042-A
The developer proposes to extend Loyola Dr. as a collector
street, and proposes to construct the required sidewalk
along one side of the street. The developer proposes
construct Wetherborne Dr. as a standard residential street
to the north boundary of the subdivision, to provide access
to the undeveloped tract beyond. These provisions are in
conformance with the City Engineer's requirements.
E. ANALYSIS•
The proposed •subdivision meets all requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations, except for the waiver being
requested to permit one pipestem lot. The applicant has, in
response to the Public Works comment regarding the pipestem
lot, made the width of the pipestem 30 feet to address the
Public Works concern. Only minor technical deficiencies
remain to be addressed.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, and the
Planning staff recommends approval of the pipestem lot
waiver.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (NOVEMBER 10, 1994)
Mr. Joe White, with White-Daters & Associates, Inc., the project
engineering firm, was present. Mr. White reviewed the comments
contained in the discussion outline. The Public Works staff
addressed the concern of the width of pipestems, saying that when
pipestems are 20 feet in width, there is insufficient room within
the frontage of the pipestem lot for a 10 foot driveway with 5
foot approach aprons on each side and a mailbox space. This is
especially true when, on a cul-de-sac or curved street, the lot
line extensions converge in the right-of-way, and the lot
frontage is reduced significantly at the curb line. The Public
Works staff cited recurring problems with these types of
situations, and indicated that, on straight sections of streets,
the minimum width of a pipestem be 30 feet. Mr. White indicated
that the 30 foot minimum width could be accommodated in the
proposed plat, and that he could appreciate the Public Works
concern. There was also a discussion about whether Wetherborne
Dr. should be constructed to collector standards, or should be
terminated in a cul-de-sac. Mr. White indicated that the
developable area to the north was limited, and that Wetherborne
Dr. would serve only a limited number of home sites from that
area; that Wetherborne Dr. needed to extend to the subdivision
boundary, however, to provide access to this land. With this
3
November 29, 1994
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 2 (Continued) _ FILE NO.: S-1042-A
discussion, and with Mr. White's assurance that deficiencies
would be remedied, the Committee forwarded the plat to the full
Commission for the public hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 29, 1994)
Staff reported that the applicant has revised the plat to provide
for a 30 foot minimum width pipestem for Lot 11, Phase 3A, and,
consequently, that all issues are resolved, except for the basic
issue of whether the single pipestem lot should be permitted.
The Planning staff recommends approval of the requested pipestem
lot waiver for this single lot in this phase. The item, approval
of the preliminary plat and a recommendation of approval of the
pipestem waiver, was included on the Consent Agenda for approval,
and was approved with the vote of 10 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent, and
0 abstentions.
4
1. Meeting Date: December 20, 1994
2. Case No.: S-1042-A
3. Request: For THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, PHASE 3, approval
of a WAIVER of the prohibition on pipestem lots.
4. Location: North and west of the present end of Loyola Dr.
5. Owner LApplicant: Winrock Development Co.
6. Existing Status: Undeveloped; zoned R-2, MF-6, MF-18, & OS
7. Proposed Use: Single -Family Residential
8. Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval
9. Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval
10. Conditions or Issues Remaining to be Resolved: None
11. Right -of -Way Issues: None
12. Recommendation Forwarded With: A vote of 10 ayes, no nays,
1 absent, and 0 abstentions
13. Obiectors: None
14. Neighborhood Contact Person/Others: Ann Borg, St. Charles
Neighborhood Association
15. Neighborhood Plan: Chenal (19)
FILE NO.: S-1042-A
NAME: THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, PHASE 3 -- PRELIMINARY PLAT
LOCATION: North of and beyond the present end of Loyola Dr.
DEVELOPER:
WINROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
P. O. Box 8080
Little Rock, AR 72203
663-5340
ENGINEER:
WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
401 S. Victory St.
Little Rock, AR 72201
374-1666
AREA: 23.8 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 59 FT. NEW STREET: 2,900
ZONING: R-2, MF-6, PROPOSED USES: Single -Family Residential
MF-18, & OS
PLANNING DISTRICT: 19
CENSUS TRACT: 42.06
VARIANCES REQUESTED: Waiver from the prohibition of pipestem
lots for Lot 11, Phase 3A.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL:
The applicant proposes a preliminary plat for the subdivision of
a 23.8 acre tract, creating 59 single-family residential lots
along 2,900 feet of new streets. Sidewalks are proposed to be
constructed along both the collector street, Loyola Drive, and
the standard residential street, Wetherborne Dr., One lot, Lot it
in Phase 3A, is proposed to be a pipestem lot.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Approval by the Planning Commission of a preliminary plat is
requested. Review by the Planning Commission and approval
by the Board of Directors is sought for a waiver from the
Subdivision Regulation which prohibits the creation of
pipestem lots, and permit one pipestem lot for Lot 11, Phase
3A.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped, and is wooded. The topography
rises from an elevation of approximately 550 feet, MSL (Mean
Sea Level) along the east boundary of the site, to over 660
feet, MSL along the west boundary of the subdivision.
Bounding the tract to the south is a phase of the St.
FILE NO.: S-1042-A Continued)
C.
M
Charles Subdivision which is currently being developed, and
Loyola Dr. extends northward into the proposed subdivision
from St. Charles Subdivision. To the north, east, and west
are large areas of undeveloped land.
The site is currently predominantly zoned R-2; however,
there are areas within the boundary which are zoned MF-6,
MF-18, and OS.
ENGINEERINGIUTILITY COMMENTS:
Public Works comments that: 1)-the grades indicated on
certain streets exceed the maximum permitted by Code; 2) a
sketch grading and drainage plan, meeting the requirements
of Sec. 29-186, is required, and a NPDES permit will be
required; 3) sidewalks, per the Master Street Plan, are to
be shown on the plat; 4) street plans, stormwater detention,
and boundary survey requirements will be required. The
Public Works staff objects to the pipestem lot waiver which
is requested, but states that if a pipestem waiver is
granted, the pipestem should be a minimum width of 30 feet
in order to be able to construct a driveway with aprons, and
have room for a mailbox within the frontage area of the lot.
Water Works comments that water main extensions will be
required. An acreage charge of $300 per acre applies in
this area, in addition to the normal charges.
Wastewater comments that sewer main extensions, -with
easements, will be required.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. comments that a 20 foot
easement will be required along the north -south boundary at
the southwest corner of the plat.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. approved the submittal without
comment.
Southwestern Hell Telephone Co. comments that easements will
be required at the perimeter of the plat area, as well as at
critical lot lines.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
ISSUES/LEGALZTECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Section 31-232(g) states that pipestem lots shall be
prohibited in residential subdivisions. One lot, Lot 11 of
Phase 3A, is proposed to be a pipestem lot; therefore, a
waiver of this prohibition will be required.
The developer proposes to extend Loyola Dr. as a collector
street, and proposes to construct the required sidewalk
2
FILE NO.: S-1042-A (Continued)
along one side of the street. The developer proposes
construct Wetherborne Dr. as a standard residential street
to the north boundary of the subdivision, to provide access
to the undeveloped tract beyond. These provisions are in
conformance with the City Engineer's requirements.
E. ANALYSIS•
The proposed subdivision meets all requirements of the
Subdivision Regulations, except for the waiver being
requested to permit one pipestem lot. The applicant has, in
response to the Public Works comment regarding the pipestem
lot, made the width of the pipestem 30 feet to address the
Public Works concern. Only minor technical deficiencies
remain to be.addressed.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, and the
Planning staff recommends approval of the pipestem lot
waiver.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (NOVEMBER 10, 1994)
Mr. Joe White, with White-Daters & Associates, Inc., the project
engineering firm, -was present. Mr. White reviewed the comments
contained in the discussion outline. The Public Works staff
addressed the concern of the width of pipestems, saying that when
pipd'stems are 20 feet in width, there is insufficient room within
the -frontage of the pipestem lot for a 10 foot driveway with 5
foot approach aprons on each side and a mailbox space. This is
especially true when, on a cul-de-sac or curved street, the lot
line extensions converge in the right-of-way, and the'lot
frontage is reduced significantly at the curb line. The Public
Works staff cited recurring problems with these types of
situations, and indicated that, on straight sections of streets,
the minimum width of'a pipestem be 30 feet. Mr. White indicated
that the 30 foot minimum width could be accommodated in the
proposed plat, and that he could appreciate the Public Works
concern. There was also a discussion about whether Wetherborne
Dr. should be constructed to collector standards, or should be
terminated in a cul-de-sac. Mr. White indicated that the
developable area to the north was limited, and that Wetherborne
Dr. would serve only a limited number of home sites from that
area; that Wetherborne Dr. needed to extend to the subdivision
boundary, however, to provide access to this land. With this
discussion, and with Mr. White's assurance that deficiencies
would be remedied, the Committee forwarded the plat to the full
Commission for the public hearing.
3
FILE NO.: S-1042-A (Continued)
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 29, 1994)
Staff reported that the applicant has revised the plat to provide
for a 30 foot minimum width pipestem for Lot 11, Phase 3A, and,
consequently, that all issues are resolved, except for the basic
issue of whether the single pipestem lot should be permitted.
The Planning staff recommends approval of the requested pipestem
lot waiver for this single lot in this phase. The item, approval
of the preliminary plat and a recommendation of approval of the
pipestem waiver, was included on the Consent Agenda for approval,
and was approved with the vote of;10 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent, and
0 abstentions.
4