Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0054-X Staff AnalysisS January 30, 1996 ITEM NO.: 2 FILE NO.: S-54-Q DAME: POINT WEST 6TH. ADDITION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATION: On the south side of Kanis Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Point West Dr. DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Pat McGetrick ERC PROPERTIES MCGETRICK ENGINEERING 815 Fort St. 11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200 Barling, AR 72923 Little Rock, AR 72211 452-9950 223-9900 AREA: 21.62 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 69 FT. NEW STREET: 4,150 ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single -Family Residential PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 CENSUS TRACT: 42.07 VARIANCES REQUESTED: Approval of a waiver from the prohibition of double -frontage lots. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: Development of 21.62 acres as a 69 lot residential subdivision is proposed. Development entails construction of 4,150 feet of new streets, as well as dedication of right-of-way and improvements along the Kanis Rd. boundary of the tract. Construction of Gamble Rd. within the subdivision will tie the existing Gamble Rd. to the south into Kanis Rd., and construction of Westglen Dr. within the subdivision will tie to the existing termination of Westglen Dr. in the abutting "West Glen Subdivision" to the east. The average lot size is proposed to be 7,800 square feet, with the minimum lot size being 7,000 square feet. The topography in three areas of the subdivision, each approximately one-half acre in size, have grades which are at or exceed 18%, thus making them subject to the "Hillside Regulations". One of the three areas falls in Tract B, which is being reserved for future development, and is outside the scope of the proposed single-family development. The other two areas are relatively small, with the grades on only one full lot and portions of nine others being at or exceeding the 18% grade. January 30, 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont.) FILE NO.: 5-54-❑ One block of lots, Lots 41 through 50, are proposed to have frontages on both Gamble Rd. on the west and on Misty Glen Dr. on the east. Because of the Ordinance prohibition on double - frontage lots, except in specific situations (which are not applicable in this situation), a waiver of the double -frontage lot prohibition is requested. A. PR9PQ5ALIREQOE5T: Approval by the Planning Commission is requested of a preliminary plat. Review by the Planning Commission and a recommendation for approval to the Board of Directors is requested for approval of a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots for Lots 41 through 50. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site of the proposed subdivision is undeveloped and heavily wooded. The topography of the tract ranges in grades of from 5 to 6% along the east boundary of the tract, to 14 to 22%, running north and south through the center of the tract, to 10 to 12% along the west boundary of the tract. The existing zoning of the tract is R-2, with R-2 zoning being the zoning of all lands surrounding the tact, except for a small 0-1 site at the northeast corner of the tract. There is an existing non -conforming commercial use at the southeast corner of Kanis Rd. and the new portion of Gamble Rd. C. ENGINEERING/UTILITY COMMENTS: Public Works staff comments: Grading permits must be obtained, and erosion control plans must be provided prior to construction. All disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched for erosion control prior to final platting of the lots. Stormwater detention analysis is required. Open ditches are generally not permitted by the Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual. If ditches are planned, they must be shown on the preliminary plat and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to Planing Commission approval of the plat. (Ref. Sec. 31-89.9 of the Code of Ordinances) 2 January 30, 1996 SUBDIVIgIO ITEM No. 2 Cont. FILE NO S-54-U A left turn lane in Kanis Rd. for east and west bound traffic must be provided. Full one-half street widening for Kanis Rd. is required upon final platting of the adjoining lots. The corner radii at Gamble Rd. and Kanis Rd. must be 31.5 feet. Sidewalks are required along Kanis Rd., Gamble, Rd., Westglen Rd., and the loop streets. The letter requesting street lights must be submitted. Little Rock Municipal Water Works commented that a water main extension will be required. Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that a sewer main extension, with easements, will be required. Arkansas Louisiana Gas co. approved the plat. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. noted that 5 foot easements on each side of common, back-to-back, lots, and platted area perimeter lot lines will be required. The Fire Department approved the submittal. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: The submitted information did not include, as required by Sec. 31-87 of the Code of ordinances: 1) the designation of the type of subdivision; 2) the name and address of the owner of record and the source of title; and, 3) any existing and the proposed covenants and restrictions. The following information, required by Sec. 31-89, has not been furnished: 1) the proposed street and sidewalk improvements for the boundary street; 2) the location of sidewalks within the subdivision; 3) the storm drainage plan and analysis; 4) the plat book and page number or instrument number of all recorded subdivisions abutting the proposed subdivision; 4) the names of all owners of platted tracts in excess of 2 1/2 acres; 5) the physical description of monuments; and, 6) a phasing plan. Sec. 31-91 requires the Certificate of Preliminary Surveying Accuracy be provided. This certificate has not been completed. Sec. 31-93 requires a preliminary Bill of Assurance be supplied. This has not been furnished. Tracts A and B are shown, but there is no information furnished on their proposed use. The areas are zoned R-2, 3 January 30, 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM 2 n FILE NO.: -54- but it is not anticipated, due to the subdivision layout, that they will be developed for single-family use. Sec. 31-367 through 31-376 is the section known as the "Hillside Regulations". This division "is designed to ensure proper integration of physical improvements in rugged topographical areas...." It applies "to those portions of a subdivision plat that have an average slope of 18% or greater. Such areas of steep slope are recognized as requiring special... development standards...." The division continues, "No lot within any hillside area ... shall be less than 10,000 square feet in area." Lots with an average slope of 18% are to meet this minimum size. Sec. 31-232.d states that: "Double frontage lots are prohibited. However, where a subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street, freeway, expressway, or railroad..., reverse frontage lots are permitted. Double frontage lots may also be used to facilitate residential development in hillside areas, as defined in (the Hillside Regulations)." Sec. 31-257 states that: "Along arterial streets ... a restricted access easement of at least 10 feet, across which there shall be no right -of -vehicle access permitted, shall be provided." E. ANALYSIS• The deficiencies in the submitted application and plat pertaining to Sections 31-87, 31-89, 31-91, and 31-93 are generally either minor in nature and easily remedied, or are routinely supplied after Planning Commission approval of the Preliminary Plat, but prior to submission of final plats. A phasing plan, and a delineation of the proposed use(s) for Tracts A and B, are needed. The average grade, east to west, across Lot 50 is 18%, making it subject to the Hillside Regulations. The minimum lot size for lots with slopes of 18% is 10,000 square feet; Lot 50 is 11,000 square feet. It complies, then, with the Hillside Regulations. Portions of Lots 3 and 4, and portions of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 36, 37, and 38 have grades at or greater than 18%. However, in each case, the average slope across the entire lot is less than 18%. On these lots, then, grading can be used to re -contour the lots to lessen the severity of the grades and exempt them from the Hillside Regulations. Because of the Master Street Plan and existing alignment of Gamble Rd., both north of Kanis Rd. and in the Point West subdivisions to the south, the alignment of Gamble Rd. in the subject phase of the Point West development is set. The 4 January 30, 1996 F : 1 ii����Li 0 1 ITEM NO • 2 .(Cont.) FILE NO.: 5--54-D space between the existing west boundary of West Glen to the east and the Gamble Rd. alignment is too great for a single row of lots, but is not wide enough for three. This creates a row of lots with frontage on both Gamble Rd. and on Misty Glen Dr., and such double frontage lots are prohibited, except in specific situations (where lots back up to arterial streets, freeways, expressways, or railroads, or where double -frontage lots are necessary due to design restrictions imposed by hillside situations). These specific situations are not applicable in the subject subdivision design, but the alignment of Gamble Rd. is a valid reason for needing and being granted a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots. The developer, however, needs to decide which street the houses are to front, and a "no vehicle" access easement needs to be platted across the "rear" street frontage. The Point West Subdivision has grown from its initial phase along Point West Dr., to include five previous phases (and even a separate subdivision) which all take access by way of Point West Dr. There are blocks and blocks of streets extending south and west from Point West Dr. which have no direct access to an arterial street, and a whole neighborhood which has just one way in and out, and that way is nothing more than a standard residential street. The neighborhood gaining access to Kanis Rd. with the tie-in by way of Gamble Rd. is critically important, not only from the aspect of convenience, but also from the safety aspect. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to: 1) the applicant completing the submission requirements and correcting the deficiencies noted; and, 2) a phasing plan being submitted and the phasing plan indicating that the Gamble Rd. tie-in to Kanis Rd. will be included in the first phase of development. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JANUARY 4, 1996) Mr. Pat McGetrick, the project engineer, was present. The Planning staff reviewed the nature of the proposal and presented the discussion outline. The Public Works staff reviewed the City Engineer's concerns. David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, reported that improvements to Kanis Rd. at the Gamble Rd. intersection and the providing of a left turn lane in Kanis Rd. would be required with the initial development. He explained that the Public Works staff would not support the development of additional lots if they were going to have to take their access off the existing street system and Gamble Rd. was not going to be constructed with the initial phase of development. It was noted 5 January 30, 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (Cant.) _ FILE NO.: S-54-Q that, if it were acquired, there would be enough land to the west for development of another block of lots, and that in naming of the streets this future possibility needs to be kept in mind; that the street numbers do not need to double back on themselves. Mr. McGetrick responded that the street names would be changed to keep this from happening. He also reported that Gamble Rd. would be included in the first phase of development, and that it would be extended to Kanis Rd. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JANUARY 30, 1996) Staff reported that there were no issues to be resolved, and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Staff recommended approval of the variance to permit double -frontage for lots 41 thru 50, with the condition that the "front" of the lots be the side facing Misty Glenn Dr. and with a "no vehicle access easement" be platted along the Gamble Rd. frontage of the lots. The preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval of the variance were included on the Consent Agenda for Approval, and the preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval were approved with the vote on 9 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, and 0 abstentions. 6 FILE O. - 4- NAME: POINT WEST 6TH. ADDITION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATION: On the south side of Kanis Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Point West Dr. DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Pat McGetrick ERC PROPERTIES MCGETRICK ENGINEERING 815 Fort St. 11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200 Barling, AR 72923 Little -Rock, AR 72211 452-9950 223-9900 AREA: 21.62 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 69 FT. NEW STREET: 4,150 ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single -Family Residential PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 CENSUS TRACT: 42.07 VARIANCES REQUESTED: Approval of a waiver from the prohibition of double -frontage lots. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: Development of 21.62 acres as a 69 lot residential subdivision is proposed. Development entails construction of 4,150 feet of new streets, as well as dedication of right-of-way and improvements along the Kanis Rd. boundary of the tract. Construction of Gamble Rd. within the subdivision will tie the existing Gamble Rd. to the south into Kanis Rd., and construction of Westglen Dr. within the subdivision will tie to the existing termination of Westglen Dr. in the abutting "West Glen Subdivision" to the east. The average lot size is proposed to be 7,800 square feet, with the minimum lot size being 7,000 square feet. The topography in three areas of the subdivision, each approximately one-half acre in size, have grades which are at or exceed 18%, thus making them subject to the "Hillside Regulations". One of the three areas falls in Tract B, which is being reserved for future development, and is outside the scope of the proposed single-family development. The other two areas are relatively small, with the grades on only one full lot and portions of nine others being at or exceeding the 18% grade. One block of lots, Lots 41 through 50, are proposed to have frontages on both Gamble Rd. on the west and on Misty Glen Dr. on the east. Because of the Ordinance prohibition on double - frontage lots, except in specific situations (which are not FILE NO.'. - 4- (Cont.) applicable in this situation), a waiver of the double -frontage lot prohibition is requested. A. PROPOSALIREOUE5T: Approval by the Planning Commission is requested of a preliminary plat. Review by the Planning Commission and a recommendation for approval to the Board of Directors is requested for approval of a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots for Lots 41 through 50. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site of the proposed subdivision is undeveloped and heavily wooded. The topography of the tract ranges in grades of from 5 to 6% along the east boundary of the tract, to 14 to 22%, running north and south through the center of the tract, to 10 to 12% along the west boundary of the tract. The existing zoning of the tract is R-2, with R-2 zoning being the zoning of all lands surrounding the tact, except for a small 0-1 site at the northeast corner of the tract. There is an existing non -conforming commercial use at the southeast corner of Kanis Rd. and the new portion of Gamble Rd. C. ENGINEERINGIDTILITY COMMENTS: Public Works staff comments: Grading permits must be obtained, and erosion control plans must be provided prior to construction. All disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched for erosion control prior to final platting of the lots. Stormwater detention analysis is required. Open ditches are generally not permitted by the Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual. If ditches are planned, they must be shown on the preliminary plat and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to Planing Commission approval of the plat. (Ref. Sec. 31-89.9 of the Code of Ordinances) A left turn lane in Kanis Rd. for east and west bound traffic must be provided. Full one-half street widening for Kanis Rd. is required upon final platting of the adjoining lots. The corner radii at Gamble Rd. and Kanis Rd. must be 31.5 feet. K FILE NO.: S-54-D (Cont.) Sidewalks are required along Ranis Rd., Gamble, Rd., Westglen Rd., and the loop streets. The letter requesting street lights must be submitted. Little Rock Municipal Water Works commented that a water main extension will be required. Little Rock Wastewater utility comments that a sewer main extension, with easements, will be required. Arkansas Louisiana Gas co. approved the plat. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. noted that 5 foot easements on each side of common, back-to-back, lots, and platted area perimeter lot lines will be required. The Fire Department approved the submittal. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: The submitted information did not include, as required by Sec. 31-87 of the Code of Ordinances: 1) the designation of the type of subdivision; 2) the name and address of the owner of record and the source of title; and, 3) any existing and the proposed covenants and restrictions. The following information, required by Sec. 31-89, has not been furnished: 1) the proposed street and sidewalk improvements for the boundary street; 2) the location of sidewalks within the subdivision; 3) the storm drainage plan and analysis; 4) the plat book and page number or instrument number of all recorded subdivisions abutting the proposed subdivision; 4) the names of all owners of platted tracts in excess of 2 1/2 acres; 5) the physical description of monuments; and, 6) a phasing plan. Sec. 31-91 requires the Certificate of Preliminary Surveying Accuracy be provided. This certificate has not been completed. Sec. 31-93 requires a preliminary Bill of Assurance be supplied. This has not been furnished. Tracts A and B are shown, but there is no information furnished on their proposed use. The areas are zoned R-2, but it is not anticipated, due to the subdivision layout, that they will be developed for single-family use. Sec. 31-367 through 31-376 is the section known as the "Hillside Regulations". This division "is designed to ensure proper integration of physical improvements in rugged topographical areas...." It applies "to those portions of a subdivision plat that have an average slope of 18% or 3 FILE - 4- n greater. Such areas of steep slope are recognized as requiring special... development standards.... , The division continues, "No lot within any hillside area... shall be less than 10,000 square feet in area." Lots with an average slope of 18% are to meet this minimum size. Sec. 31-232.d states that: "Double frontage lots are prohibited. However, where a subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street, freeway, expressway, or railroad..., reverse frontage lots are permitted. Double frontage lots may also be used to facilitate residential development in hillside areas, as defined in (the Hillside Regulations)." Sec. 31-257 states that: "Along arterial streets ... a restricted access easement of at least 10 feet, across which there shall be no right -of -vehicle access permitted, shall be provided." E. ANALYSIS: The deficiencies in the submitted application and plat pertaining to Sections 31-87, 31-89, 31-91, and 31-93 are generally either minor in nature and easily remedied, or are routinely supplied after Planning Commission approval of the Preliminary Plat, but prior to submission of final plats. A phasing plan, and a delineation of the proposed use(s) for Tracts A and B, are needed. The average grade, east to west, across Lot 50 is 18%, making it subject to the Hillside Regulations. The minimum lot size for lots with slopes of 18% is 10,000 square feet; Lot 50 is 11,000 square feet. It complies, then, with the Hillside Regulations. Portions of Lots 3 and 4, and portions of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 36, 37, and 38 have grades at or greater than 18%. However, in each case, the average slope across the entire lot is less than 18%. on these lots, then, grading can be used to re -contour the lots to lessen the severity of the grades and exempt them from the Hillside Regulations. Because of the Master Street Plan and existing alignment of Gamble Rd., both north of Kanis Rd. and in the Point West subdivisions to the south, the alignment of Gamble Rd. in the subject phase of the Point West development is set. The space between the existing west boundary of West Glen to the east and the Gamble Rd. alignment is too great for a single row of lots, but is not wide enough for three. This creates a row of lots with frontage on both Gamble Rd. and on Misty Glen Dr., and such double frontage lots are prohibited, except in specific situations (where lots back up to arterial streets, freeways, expressways, or railroads, or where double -frontage lots are necessary due to design restrictions imposed by hillside situations). These specific situations are not applicable in the subject 4 FILE NO_! S-54-Q (gont.)_ subdivision design, but the alignment of Gamble Rd. is a valid reason for needing and being granted a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots. The developer, however, needs to decide which street the houses are to front, and a "no vehicle" access easement needs to be platted across the "rear" street frontage. The Point West Subdivision has grown from its initial phase along Point West Dr., to include five previous phases (and even a separate subdivision) which all take access by way of Point West Dr. There are blocks and blocks of streets extending south and west from Point West Dr. which have no direct access to an arterial street, and a whole neighborhood which has just one way in and out, and that way is nothing more than a standard residential street. The neighborhood gaining access to Kanis Rd. with the tie-in by way of Gamble Rd. is critically important, not only from the aspect of convenience, but also from the safety aspect. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to: 1) the applicant completing the submission requirements and correcting the deficiencies noted; and, 2) a phasing plan being submitted and the phasing plan indicating that the Gamble Rd. tie-in to Kanis Rd. will be included in the first phase of development. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JANUARY 4, 1996) Mr. Pat McGetrick, the project engineer, was present. The Planning staff reviewed the nature of the proposal and presented the discussion outline. The Public Works staff reviewed the City Engineer's concerns. David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, reported that improvements to Kanis Rd. at the Gamble Rd. intersection and the providing of a left turn lane in Kanis Rd. would be required with the initial development. He explained that the Public Works staff would not support the development of additional lots if they were going to have to take their access off the existing street system and Gamble Rd. was not going to be constructed with the initial phase of development. It was noted that, if it were acquired, there would be enough land to the west for development of another block of lots, and that in naming of the streets this future possibility needs to be kept in mind; that the street numbers do not need to double back on themselves. Mr. McGetrick responded that the street names would be changed to keep this from happening. He also reported that Gamble Rd. would be included in the first phase of development, and that it would be extended to Kanis Rd. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. 5 FILE - 4- 'n PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JANUARY 30, 1996) Staff reported that there were no issues to be resolved, and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Staff recommended approval of the variance to permit double -frontage for lots 41 thru 50, with the condition that the "front" of the lots be the side facing Misty Glenn Dr. and with a "no vehicle access easement" be platted along the Gamble Rd. frontage of the lots. The preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval of the variance were included on the Consent Agenda for Approval, and the preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval were approved with the vote on 9 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, and 0 abstentions. 6 January 30, 1996 ITEM O.: 2 FILE NO.: S-54-Q NAME: POINT WEST 6TH. ADDITION -- PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATION: On the south side of Kanis Rd., approximately 0.25 mile west of Point West Dr. DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Pat McGetrick ERC PROPERTIES MCGETRICK ENGINEERING 815 Fort St. 11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200 Barling, AR 72923 Little Rock, AR 72211 452-9950 223-9900 AREA: 21.62 ACRES NUMBER OF LOTS: 69 FT. NEW STREET: 4,150 ZONING: R-2 PROPOSED USES: Single -Family Residential PLANNING DISTRICT: 18 CENSUS TRACT: 42.07 VARIANCES REQUESTED: Approval of a waiver from the prohibition of double -frontage lots. STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL: Development of 21.62 acres as a 69 lot residential subdivision is proposed. Development entails construction of 4,150 feet of new streets, as well as dedication of right-of-way and improvements along the Kanis Rd. boundary of the tract. Construction of Gamble Rd. within the subdivision will tie the existing Gamble Rd. to the south into Kanis Rd., and construction of Westglen Dr. within the subdivision will tie to the existing termination of Westglen Dr. in the abutting "West Glen Subdivision" to the east. The average lot size is proposed to be 7,800 square feet, with the minimum lot size being 7,000 square feet. The topography in three areas of the subdivision, each approximately one-half acre in size, have grades which are at or exceed 18%, thus making them subject to the "Hillside Regulations". One of the three areas falls in Tract B, which is being reserved for future development, and'is outside the scope of the proposed single-family development. The other two areas are relatively small, with the grades on only one full lot and portions of nine others being at or exceeding the 18% grade. January 30, 1996 ITEM NO.; 2(Cont.)FILE NO.: -54- One block of lots, Lots 41 through 50, are proposed to have frontages on both Gamble Rd. on the west and on Misty Glen Dr. on the east. Because of the Ordinance prohibition on double - frontage lots, except in specific situations (which are not applicable in this situation), a waiver of the double -frontage lot prohibition is requested. A. PROPOSALIREWE$T: Approval by the Planning Commission is requested of a preliminary plat. Review by the Planning Commission and a recommendation for approval to the Board of Directors is requested for approval of a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots for Lots 41 through 50. B. EXISTING CONDITION : The site of the proposed subdivision is undeveloped and heavily wooded. The topography of the tract ranges in grades of from 5 to 6% along the east boundary of the tract, to 14 to 22%, running north and south through the center of the tract, to 10 to 12% along the west boundary of the tract. The existing zoning of the tract is R-2, with R-2 zoning being the zoning of all lands surrounding the tact, except for a small 0-1 site at the northeast corner of the tract. There is an existing non -conforming commercial use at the southeast corner of Kanis Rd. and the new portion of Gamble Rd. C. ENGINEERINGIUTI_LITY COMMENTS: Public Works staff comments: Grading permits must be obtained, and erosion control plans must be provided prior to construction. All disturbed areas are to be seeded and mulched for erosion control prior to final platting of the lots. Stormwater detention analysis is required. Open ditches are generally not permitted by the Stormwater Management and Drainage Manual. If ditches are planned, they must be shown on the preliminary plat and must be approved by the City Engineer prior to Planing Commission approval of the plat. (Ref. Sec. 31-89.9 of the Code of Ordinances) January 30, 1996 HDIVI I ITEM a.: 2 n FILE Na.: -54- A left turn lane in Kanis Rd. for east and west bound traffic must be provided. Full one-half street widening for Kanis Rd. is required upon final platting of the adjoining lots. The corner radii at Gamble Rd. and Kanis Rd. must be 31.5 feet. Sidewalks are required along Kanis Rd., Gamble, Rd., Westglen Rd., and the loop streets. The letter requesting street lights must be submitted. Little Rock Municipal Water Works commented that a water main extension will be required. Little Rock Wastewater Utility comments that a sewer main extension, with easements, will be required. Arkansas Louisiana Gas co. approved the plat. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. noted that 5 foot easements on each side of common, back-to-back, lots, and platted area perimeter lot lines will be required. The Fire Department approved the submittal. D. ISSUES LEGAL/TECHNICAL DESIGN: The submitted information did not include, as required by Sec. 31-87 of the Code of ordinances: 1) the designation of the type of subdivision; 2) the name and address of the owner of record and the source of title; and, 3) any existing and the proposed covenants and restrictions. The following information, required by Sec. 31-89, has not been furnished: 1) the proposed street and sidewalk improvements for the boundary street; 2) the location of sidewalks within the subdivision; 3) the storm drainage plan and analysis; 4) the plat book and page number or instrument number of all recorded subdivisions abutting the proposed subdivision; 4) the names of all owners of platted tracts in excess of 2 1/2 acres; 5) the physical description of monuments; and, 6) a phasing plan. Sec. 31-91 requires the Certificate of Preliminary Surveying Accuracy be provided. This certificate has not been completed. Sec. 31-93 requires a preliminary Bill of Assurance be supplied. This has not been furnished. Tracts A and B are shown, but there is no information furnished on their proposed use. The areas are zoned R-2, 3 January 30, 1996 ITEM NO.: 2 (Cont .) FILE NO.: 5-54-U but it is not anticipated, due to the subdivision layout, that they will be developed for single-family use. Sec. 31-367 through 31-376 is the section known as the "Hillside Regulations". This division "is designed to ensure proper -integration of physical, improvements in rugged topographical areas...." It applies "to those portions of a subdivision plat that have an average slope of 18% or greater. Such areas of steep slope are recognized as requiring special... development standards...." The division continues, "No lot within any hillside area ... shall be less than 10,000 square feet in area." Lots with an average slope of 18% are to meet this minimum size. Sec. 31-232.d states that: "Double frontage lots are prohibited. However, where a subdivision abuts or contains an existing or proposed arterial street, freeway, expressway, or railroad..., reverse frontage lots are permitted. Double frontage lots may also be used to facilitate residential development in hillside areas, as defined in (the Hillside Regulations)." Sec. 31-257 states that: "Along arterial streets ... a restricted access easement of at least 10 feet, across which there shall be no right -of -vehicle access permitted, shall be provided." E. ANALYSIS: The deficiencies in the submitted application and plat pertaining to Sections 31-87, 31-89, 31-91, and 31-93 are generally either minor in nature and easily remedied, or are routinely supplied after Planning Commission approval of the Preliminary Plat, but prior to submission of final plats. A phasing plan, and a delineation of the proposed use(s) for Tracts A and B, are needed. The average grade, east to west, across Lot 50 is 18%, making it subject to the Hillside Regulations. The minimum lot size for lots with slopes of 18% is 10,000 square feet; Lot 50 is 11,000 square feet. It complies, then, with the Hillside Regulations. Portions of Lots 3 and 4, and portions of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 36, 37, and 38 have grades at or greater than 18%. However, in each case, the average slope across the entire lot is less than 18%. On these lots, then, grading can be used to re -contour the lots to lessen the severity of the grades and exempt them from the Hillside Regulations. Because of the Master Street Plan and existing alignment of Gamble Rd., both north of Kanis Rd. and in the Point West subdivisions to the south, the alignment of Gamble Rd. in the subject phase of the Point West development is set. The 4 January 30, 1996 HDIVI I ITEM o.: 2(Cont.)FILE O.: - 4- space between the existing west boundary of West Glen to the east and the Gamble Rd. alignment is too great for a single row of lots, but is not wide enough for three. This creates a row of lots with frontage on both Gamble Rd. and on Misty Glen Dr., and such double frontage lots are prohibited, except in specific situations (where lots back up to arterial streets, freeways, expressways, or railroads, or where double -frontage lots are necessary due to design restrictions imposed by hillside situations). These specific situations are not applicable in the subject subdivision design, but the alignment of Gamble Rd. is a valid reason for needing and being granted a waiver from the prohibition on double -frontage lots. The developer, however, needs to decide which street the houses are to front, and a "no vehicle" access easement needs to be platted across the "rear" street frontage. The Point West Subdivision has grown from its initial phase along Point West Dr., to include five previous phases (and even a separate subdivision) which all take access by way of Point West Dr. There are blocks and blocks of streets extending south and west from Point West Dr. which have no direct access to an arterial street, and a whole neighborhood which has just one way in and out, and that way is nothing more than a standard residential street. The neighborhood gaining access to Kanis Rd. with the tie-in by way of Gamble Rd. is critically important, not only from the aspect of convenience, but also from the safety aspect. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat, subject to: 1) the applicant completing the submission requirements and correcting the deficiencies noted; and, 2) a phasing plan being submitted and the phasing plan indicating that the Gamble Rd. tie-in to Kanis Rd. will be included in the first phase of development. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JANUARY 4, 1996) Mr. Pat McGetrick, the project engineer, was present. The Planning staff reviewed the nature of the proposal and presented the discussion outline. The Public Works staff reviewed the City Engineer's concerns. David Scherer, with the Public Works staff, reported that improvements to Kanis Rd. at the Gamble Rd. intersection and the providing of a left turn lane in Kanis Rd. would be required with the initial development. He explained that the Public Works staff would not support the development of additional lots if they were going to have to take their access off the existing street system and Gamble Rd. was not going to be constructed with the initial phase of development. It was noted 5 January 30, 1996 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 2 (ront.) FILE NO.: 5-54-€] that, if it were acquired, there would be enough land to the west for development of another block of lots, and that in naming of the streets this future possibility needs to be kept in mind; that the street numbers do not need to double back on themselves. Mr. McGetrick responded that the street names would be changed to keep this from happening. He also reported that Gamble Rd. would be included in the first phase of development, and that it would be extended to Kanis Rd. Following the discussion, the Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JANUARY 30, 1996) Staff reported that there were no issues to be resolved, and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Staff recommended approval of the variance to permit double -frontage for lots 41 thru 50, with the condition that the "front" of the lots be the side facing Misty Glenn Dr. and with a "no vehicle access easement" be platted along the Gamble Rd. frontage of the lots. The preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval of the variance were included on the Consent Agenda for Approval, and the preliminary plat and the recommendation for approval were approved with the vote on 9 ayes, 0 nays, 2 absent, and 0 abstentions. 6