HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0046 Staff Analysisrvr. t
SUBDIVI LIONS
Item No. 4 -
F
0
Name: Overlook Park
Lots 121 - 136
Location: South side of Overlook Drive,
west from the CRI&P Railway
1-31-78
Developer Engineer
Eugene M. Pfeifer III Edward G. Smith & Associates
401 Victory Street
Little Rock., Arkansas 72201
374-1666
Area: 26.8 A. No. of Lots: 16 Ft. New Et.: 0
Zoning: "A" One Fam. Prop. Uses: One Family residences
planninv ❑istrict: West Little Rock
Census Tract: 22.01
Variances Requested:
1. To permit stem shaped lots.
2. Twenty -foot private drive as principal access.
3. Depth to width ratio in excess of 3.5 to 1.
4. Seventeen percent grade on the private drive.
4 - Cont'd
EXISTING CONDITIONS
1.
Physical Site Characteristics
The site is on the hillside below existing
development overlooking Murray Lock and Dam.
There is no significant concentrated drainage. Slopes are from 30 to 40 percent.
North across Overlook Drive the slope
continues to the railroad and Rebsamen Park
Road.
2. Existing Public Facilities
Overlook Drive is adjacent on the north, but
does not provide vehicular access to the
lots.
All public utilities are available and will
be extended.
B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
1. Site Preparation
Clearing and grading will
tae placeis along
AV the street right-of-way, which
on a side hill slope.
2. Project Characteristics
All lots are proposed to take access from
the proposed 20 foot private drive, which
parallels Overlook Drive, making most of
the lots in effect double frontage lots.
This is because steep lots are more
easily entered from the uphill side.
3. Provision for Public Facilities and Services
The private drive as currently proposed,
would be 20 feet of paved width, with
one-way traffic.
Water lines may be placed on the downhill
sides of the lots rather than in the drive,
but will as usual be reviewed by the
Fire Department for hydrant location, etc.
U1
Item No. _4 _ Cont'd
4. Legal Considerations
Since these are mostly double frontage lots,
access to Overlook Drive should be restricted
on the plat and in the Bill of Assurance.
Overlook Drive is a designated collector
street which is in place to current
standards.
C. ANALYSIS
Double frontage lots are appropriate to the
terrain.
The private drive could be developed to a higher
standard and conform to grade requirements as now
being Proposed in the new Subdivision Ordinance.
Intersections on ❑verlook Drive should be
approved in detail by the Engineering Division,
with realignment as necessary to accomplish
the above.
Stein shaped portions of lots which do not serve
as access should be eliminated.
D. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval subject to:
1. Restrict access to Overlook Drive.
2. Provide a 24 foot pavement with curbs and
gutters. The downhill curb could be
flat, subject to Engineering approval.
3. Maintain a maximum grade of 15 percent as
proposed in the new ordinance.
4. Intersections to be approved in detail by
the Engineering Division with realignments
as necessary.
5. Eliminate stem shaped portions of lots.
6. Waive depth to width ratio.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
Approval as recommended by the staff.
Item No. 4 - Cont'd
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The owner and engineer were present and in agreement
with the Subdivision Committee recommendation. They
stated a preference for a public street rather than a
private street.
The Commission unanimously approved the plat as
recommended by the Subdivision Committee.
f
Ll
i
ME
SUBDIVISIONS 1-31-78
Item No. 4 -
Name: Overlook Park
Lots 121 - 136
Location: South side of Overlook Drive,
west from the CRI&P Railway
Developer Engineer
Eugene M. Pfeifer III Edward G. Smith & Associates
401 Victory Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
374-1666
Area: 26.8 A. No. of Lots: 16 Ft. New St. 0
Zoning: "A" One Fam. Prop. Uses: One Family residences
Planning District: West Little Rock
Census Tract: 22.01
Variances Requested:
1. To permit stem shaped lots.
2. Twenty -foot private drive as principal access.
3. Depth to width ratio in excess of 3.5 to 1.
4. Seventeen percent grade on the private drive.
r'f
J
10
r
-Y
Item No. 4 -- Cont'd
A. EXITING CONDITIONS
1. Physical Site Characteristics
The site is on the hillside below existing
development overlooking Murray Lock and Dam.
There is no significant concentrated
drainage. Slopes are from 30 to 40 percent.
North across Overlook Drive the slope
continues to the railroad and 'Rebsamen Park
Road.
2. Existing Public Facilities
Overlook Drive is adjacent on the north, but
does not provide vehicular access to the
lots.
All public utilities are available and will
be extended.
B. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
1. Site Preparation
Clearing and grading will take place along
the street right-of-way, which is mostly
on a side hill slope.
2. Project Characteristics
All lots are proposed to take access from
the proposed 20 foot private drive, which
parallels Overlook Drive, making most of
the lots in effect double frontage lots.
This is because steep lots are more
easily entered from the uphill side.
3. Provision for Public Facilities and Services
The private drive as currently proposed,
would be 20 feet of paved width, with
one-way traffic.
water lines may be placed on the downhill
sides of the lots rather than in the drive,
but will as usual be reviewed by the
Fire Department for hydrant location, etc.
Item No. 4 - Cont'd
4. Legal Considerations
Since these are mostly double frontage lots,
access to Overlook Drive should be restricted
on the plat and in the Bill of Assurance.
Overlook Drive is a designated collector
street which is in place to current
standards.
C. ANALYSIS
• Double frontage lots are appropriate to the
terrain.
The private drive could be developed to a higher
standard and conform to grade -requirements as now
being proposed in the new Subdivision Ordinance.
Intersections on Overlook Drive should be
approved in detail by the Engineering Division,
with realignment as necessary to accomplish
the above.
Stein shaped portions of lots which do not serve
ti as access should be eliminated.
D. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
The staff recommends approval subject to:
1. Restrict access to Overlook Drive.
2. Provide a 24 foot pavement with curbs and
gutters. The downhill curb could be
flat, subject to Engineering approval.
3. Maintain a maximum grade of 15 percent as
proposed in the new ordinance.
4. Intersections to be approved in detail by
the Engineering Division with realignments
as necessary.
5. Eliminate stem shaped portions of lots.
6. Waive depth to width ratio.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
Approval as recommended by the staff.
40
0
I
N
r.]
E.
Item No. 4 - Cont'd
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The owner and engineer were present and in agreement
with the Subdivision Committee recommendation. They
stated a preference for a public street rather than a
private street.
The Commission unanimously approved the plat as
recommended by the Subdivision Committee.