HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0036-D Staff AnalysisApril 10, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 10
NAME: Lusk Site Plan Review
LOCATION: 1415 Barrow
DEVELOPER: SURVEYOR:
Bill Lusk Robert Holloway
7509 Cantrell 7509 Cantrell
Little Rock, AR Little Rock, AR
Phone: 666-5407 Phone: 666-5407
AREA: 2.2157 acres NO. OF LOTS: 2 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0
ZONING: "C-3"
PROPOSED USES: Offices
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
None.
A. Site History
Platting activity on the site has resulted in the
formation of three lots. An existing office building
is located on the northern portion of Lot 2.
B. Proposal
1. Development according to the following:
Bldg. 1 Bldg. 2
(Existing) (Proposed) Totals
Size: 6,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 12,000 sq. ft.
Parking: 15 spaces 24 spaces 39 spaces
C. Engineering Considerations
1. New parking should comply with Zoning and
Landscaping Ordinances.
2. Discuss drainage plan with City Engineer's Office.
April 10, 1984
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 10 - Continued
D. Analysis
The proposed site plan fails to meet the 25' rear yard
setback required in "C-3" districts if the lines shown
on the plan indicate the actual lot lines. Due to the
fact that bulk and area requirements aren't supposed to
be waived under the site plan review process, staff is
requesting that the applicant plat the buildable area
of each structure. The Fire Department also has
submitted comments relative to the drives and parking
on the site.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present. The inadequate rear setback and
Fire Department requests were discussed. The applicant was
instructed to:
(1) Remove the lot line between Lots 2 and 3, or replat
Lot 2 to accommodate a 25-foot setback.
(2) Meet with Fire Department concerning their requests.
(3) Meet with Water Works, who had expressed concerns about
access to Lot 3 relative to water services.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors.
Potential problems with later development of Lot 3 was
discussed with the applicant, Greg Crawford. A motion was
made for approval, subject to submission of a replat. The
vote was: 8 ayes, 0 noes and 4 absent.