HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0045-DD Staff AnalysisDecember 17, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item
NAME:
LOCATION:
DEVET.OPER :
Otter Creek Industrial Park
Mabelvale West Road and I-30
ENGTNEER:
Otter Creek Development Co. Garver & Garver Engineers
Robert Light llth and Battery
c/o Friday Law Firm Little Rock, AR 72203
First National Bank Bldg. 376-3633
Little Rock, AR 72201
376-2011
AREA: Acres No. of Lots: 49 Ft. New Street: 2900
ZONING/EXISTING ZONING: 11
I-2"
PROPOSED USES: Light Industrial
VARIANCES REQUESTED: Allow 1000-foot cul-de-sac
A. Existing Conditions
This site is located southwest of the City in an area
that is developing as industrial and that is
immediately east of Interstate 30.
B. Development Proposal
The applicant is proposing a plat of 159.59 acres;
however, a portion of the preliminary has been
approved. The purpose of this submission, staff
assumes, is to add a 41 acre site to the original plat
for a large distribution facility.
C. Engineering Comments
Will be given at the meeting.
D. Analysis
Staff would like for the applicant to clarify his
proposal. Is this revision solely for the purpose of
the addition of the 41 acres? There is a possibility
that floodplain and right-of-way dedication will be
needed depending on the explanation given.
E. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
December 17, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 4 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant stated that the revision was solely for the
purpose of adding the 41 acres and that the right-of-way or
the interchange would be dedicated when the lots adjacent to
it or platted or when the Otter Creek Mall is done.
Water Works - A 12-inch water main extension is required to
serve the lots as platted. Relocation of a 16-inch main at
the interchange may be required. An acreage charge of $150
per acre will apply.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
Staff reported that a revised plan had been submitted that
provided a 50-foot access easement to the Affiliated Food
Store site. Staff felt that the easement should be built as
an industrial street. The Commission disagreed since it was
not a means of primary access.
A motion for approval was made and passed by a vote of:
10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.