Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS-0170-N Staff AnalysisSeptember 11, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 NAME: Pleasant Valley Professional Subdivision LOCATION: On South side of Hinson Road located approximately 1200 feet west of intersection of Hinson and Hinson Loop nRVRT.nPRR: ENGINEER: Ampersand Properties Edward G. Smith and Associates c/o Mike McQueen 401 Victory 12115 Hinson Road Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72212 Phone: 374-1666 Phone: (501) 664-1000 AREA: 5.02 acres NO. OF LOTS: 4 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 ZONING: "0-2" PROPOSED USES: Office Building Sites VARIANCES REQUESTED: 27' private street without curb A. Site History None. B. Existing Conditions This site is located in what can generally be described as a commercial/office area. The sole structure on -site consists of an office building. C. Development Proposal This is a plan to develop 5.02 acres into four lots to be developed for office use. The applicant is asking that the existing drive be converted to a private street by widening and improving and that no curb be provided. D. Engineering Considerations Dedicate right-of-way and improve Hinson Road to minor arterial standards. September 11, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 3 - Continued E. Analysis Wastewater reports that a sanitary sewer main extension will be required. This application represents an attempt by the applicant to subdivde a parcel of 5.20 acres into four lots on a site that is zoned "0-2." A conflict with the zoning Ordinance is created since this zoning district requires a minimum site area of two acres. In addition, all sites must be developed under a unified site plan and a 25' landscape strip parallel to and abutting any boundary street shall be provided and maintained by the owners. No parking is allowed in the strip. Staff questions the purpose for not indicating improvements the full extent of the access easement. The applicant should clarify. Since this is a commercial/office subdivision, the street whether public or private is required to be 36' wide. F. Staff Recommendation Staff will recommend approval provided the above issues are resolved. SUBDIVISION COMMITEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The applicant requested a waiver of the 36' street width requirement due to a desire to maintain the existing character of the office development currently on -site. Discussion centered on the applicants providing a 26' street inside the development with a turning radius onto Hinson Road. Because of the problem with the 110-2" zoning requirements, it was decided that he should withdraw the application and convert this to a "PUD." Waterworks designates 50' on east side as utility and access easement. Lot 2 is served off Hinson, so extension will be needed for a new line. Prorated charge for Lot 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: By request of the applicant, a motion for a 30-day deferral was made and passed by a vote of: 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. November 13, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued E. Analysis Wastewater reports that a sanitary sewer main extension will be required. This application represents an attempt by the applicant to subdivide a parcel of 5.20 acres into four lots on a site that is zoned "0-2." A conflict with the Zoning Ordinance is created since this zoning district requires a minimum site area of two acres. In addition, all sites must be developed under a unified site plan and a 25' landscape strip parallel to and abutting any boundary street shall be provided and maintained by the owners. No parking is allowed in the strip. Staff questions the purpose for not indicating improvements the full extent of the access easement. The applicant should clarify. Since this is a commercial/office subdivision, the street whether public or private is required to be 36' wide. F. Staff Recommendation Staff will recommend approval provided the above issues are resolved. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The applicant requested a waiver of the 36' street width requirement due to a desire to maintain the existing character of the office development currently on -site. Discussion centered on the applicants providing a 26' street inside the development with a turning radius onto Hinson Road. Because of the problem with the "0-2" zoning requirements, it was decided that he should withdraw the application and convert this to a "PUD." Water Works designates 50' on east side as utility and access easement. Lot 2 is served off Hinson, so extension will be needed for a new line. Prorated charge for Lot 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: By request of the applicant, a motion for a 30-day deferral was made and passed by a vote of: 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. November 13, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (10-9-84) There was no further review of the item. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (10-9-84) A motion for a 30-day deferral, as requested by the applicant, was made and passed by a vote of: 6 ayes, 0 noes and 4 absent. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (10-25-84) Staff reported that the applicant had requested that the item be withdrawn from the agenda. November 13, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A NAME: Pleasant Valley Professional Subdivision LOCATION• On South side of Hinson Road located approximately 1200 feet west of intersection of Hinson and Hinson Loop nPURMPRR s Ampersand Properties c/o Mike McQueen 12115 Hinson Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Phone: 664-1000 RMaTMRRR t Edward G. Smith and Associates 401 Victory Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: 374-1666 AREA: 5.02 acres NO. OF LOTS: 4 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 ZONING: "O-2" PROPOSED USES: Office Building Sites VARIANCES REQUESTED: 27' private street without curb A. Site Histor None. B. Existing Conditions This site is located in what can generally be described as a commercial/office area. The sole structure on -site consists of an office building. C. Development Pro osal This is a plan to develop 5.02 acres into four lots to be developed for office use. The applicant is asking that the existing drive be converted to a private street by widening and improving and that no curb be provided. D. Engineering Considerations Dedicate right -of -way -and improve Hinson Road to minor arterial standards. 1 October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. B NAME: Pleasant Valley Professional Subdivision LOCATION: On South side of Hinson Road located approximately 1200 feet west of intersection of Hinson and Hinson Loop DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: Ampersand Properties Edward G. Smith and Associates c/o Mike McQueen 401 Victory 12115 Hinson Road Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72212 Phone: 374-1666 Phone: 664-1000 AREA: 5.02 acres NO. OF LOTS: 4 FT. OF NEW ST.: 0 ZONING: "0-2" PROPOSED USES: Office Building Sites VARIANCES REQUESTED: 27' private street without curb A. Site Histor None. B. ExistinQ Conditions This site is located in what can generally be described as a commercial/office area. The sole structure on -site consists of an office building. C. Development Proposal This is a plan to develop 5.02 acres into four lots to be developed for office use. The applicant is asking that the existing drive be converted to a private street by widening and improving and that no curb be provided. D. Engineering Considerations Dedicate right-of-way and improve Hinson Road to minor arterial standards. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. B - Continued E. Analysis Wastewater reports that a sanitary sewer main extension will be required. This application represents an attempt by the applicant to subdivide a parcel of 5.20 acres into four lots on a site that is zoned "0-2." A conflict with the Zoning Ordinance is created since this zoning district requires a minimum site area of two acres. In addition, all sites must be developed under a unified site plan and a 25' landscape strip parallel to and abutting any boundary street shall be provided and maintained by the owners. No parking is allowed in the strip. Staff questions the purpose for not indicating improvements the full extent of the access easement. The applicant should clarify. Since this is a commercial/office subdivision, the street whether public or private is required to be 36' wide. F. Staff Recommendation Staff will recommend approval provided the above issues are resolved. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The applicant requested a waiver of the 36' street width requirement due to a desire to maintain the existing character of the office development currently on -site. Discussion centered on the applicants providing a 26' street inside the development with a turning radius onto Hinson Road. Because of the problem with the "0-2" zoning requirements, it was decided that he should withdraw the application and convert this to a "PUD." Water Works designates 50' on east side as utility and access easement. Lot 2 is served off Hinson, so extension will be needed for a new line. Prorated charge for Lot 1. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: By request of the applicant, a motion for a 30-day deferral was made and passed by a vote of: 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. B - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (10-9-84) There was no further review of the item. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (10-9-84) A motion for a 30-day deferral, as requested by the applicant, was made and passed by a vote of: 6 ayes, 0 noes and 4 absent.