Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Z-8503-D Application 2
City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Planning Zoning and Subdivision NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND March 4, 2016 John Barrow Neighborhood Association Carolyn Heitman 8123 West 40th Little Rock, AR 72204 REQUEST: Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R Z-8503-D a reguest to revise the previouslyapproved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing, identify an area for future single-family development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed for purchase by the developer. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT: Tim Daters. White-Daters and Associates A ent 501.821.1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoninq Development of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on April 7, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND March 4, 2016 City Director Doris Wright 3705 Cobb Street Little Rock, AR 72204 REQUEST: Herrick Heiqhts Lonq-form PD-R (Z-8503-D), a request to revise the previously approved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing. identify an area for future sin le-famil development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site Plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed for purchase by the developer GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT: Tim Daters White-Daters and Associates Age (501.821.1667) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on April 7, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND March 4, 2016 Woodlands Edge Community Association, Inc Vicki Tyne 1701 Centerview Drive, Ste.115 Little Rock, AR 72211 REQUEST: Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R Z-8503-D a request to revise the previously approved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing, identify an area for future single-family development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed for purchase by the developer. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT: Tim Daters. White-Daters and Associates Agent (501.821.1667) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on April 7, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND April 15, 2016 John Barrow Neighborhood Association Carolyn Heitman 8123 West 40th Little Rock, AR 72204 REQUEST: Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R Z-8503-D a request to revise the previously approved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing, identify an area for future single-family development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed for purchase by the developer GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT Tim Daters. White-Daters and Associates A ent (501.821.1667) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on May 19, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND April 15, 2016 City Director Doris Wright 3705 Cobb Street Little Rock, AR 72204 REQUEST: Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R Z-8503-D), a request to revise the previously approved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing, identify an area for future single-family development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed for purchase by the developer. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT: Tim Daters. White-Daters and Associates Agent (501.821.1667) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on May 19, 2016 at 4.00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR A USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND April 15, 2016 Woodlands Edge Community Association, Inc. c/o Beverly Roachell Peak Properties, LLC 11711 Hermitage Road, Suite 7 Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 REQUEST: Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R Z-8503-D a request to revise the previously approved Planned Residential Development to allow the construction of 408 additional units of multi -family housing,identify an area for future sin le-famii development and an area for future non -multi -family development. The site plan includes the entire 60+ acres proposed forpurchase by the developer. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: west of Bowman Road between Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments OWNED BY/APPLICANT: Tim Daters. White-Daters and Associates Agent (501.821.1667) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Devel❑ meet of the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Little Rock Board of Directors Chambers, second floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, on May 19, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This item is being returned to the Planning Commission by the Board of Directors for further review. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. Tony Bozynski Director of Planning and Development City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 April 15, 2016 White Daters and Associates Attn. Tamera 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Z-8503-0 - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Sirs: This is to advise you that in connection with your request concerning the above referenced file number the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 7, 2016: Approved with conditions. Recommended approval with conditions. Recommended approval as submitted. Denied your request as submitted. X Deferred to the Mav 19, 2016 Meeting. Other: If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, Donna James, AICP Subdivision Administrator OM 1. •r. _'�utiy~.}� ��� � � ti��,�t :•�.'y�:. ':t;.7/�..��+■ r' .C'yTY a� '� •�y �. �'r • Jn r � '� r•f/ +�5� r 'Fi � ..S' i rr+:F� .x '. � � ,Y V. 1 ;v . is .. '• '_ ' ' ` ■ - -4�6p' ter • � . fib• � , ,.` � �rx s �rrYL3s� •`�e, a"� � r�! , �al�� Y ' .r ~ St fir CIO +��'i• {yam �. ,.. .-.- r,��.. r: mow, ,. `, " Sva . .. �,f . ` •� .. h • ` ` V nC rit r 4—/ it l ��� ,_.'. 9' x�,�w!y � � �• �:> ■ ,. ' w �n-� � i r: �' 1 O Ali ¢� it to NW IN When recorded return to: Timothy W. Grooms, Esq. QUATTLEBAUM, GROOMS & TULL PLLC 111 Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-3 79-1700 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS (this "Declaration") is made as of the day of , 2016, by RICHARDSON PROPERTIES, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company ("Richardson"), for the benefit of THE POINTE AT BRODIE CREEK PHASE III, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company ("Phase III"), BRODIE CREEK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arkansas nonprofit corporation ("Brodie Creek POA"), WOODLANDS EDGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arkansas nonprofit corporation ("Woodlands Edge"), and THE POINTE AT BRODIE CREEK, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company ("The Pointe"). WHEREAS, Richardson is the owner of the certain property in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, depicted on Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, said tract being more particularly described in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"); WHEREAS, Richardson, by and through its developer, The Pointe, applied to the City of Little Rock (the "City") for a zoning change to certain portions of the Property as noted in application number Z-8503-D (the "Application"); WHEREAS, Phase III is the owner of certain property in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, described in Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Phase III Property"); WHEREAS, The Pointe is the owner of certain property in Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, described in Exhibit D, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein ("The Pointe Property"); WHEREAS, Brodie Creek POA is a Property Owners' Association representing owners of certain properties located near the Property; WHEREAS, Woodlands Edge is a Property Owners' Association representing owners of certain property located near the Property; and PAGE 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to certain agreements by and among Richardson, Brodie Creek POA, Woodlands Edge, Phase III and the Pointe, Richardson agreed to certain conditions and restrictions with regards to the development of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of $10.00, the premises, covenants, conditions, restrictions and encumbrances contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Richardson hereby establishes the following restrictions and covenants: 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The statements set forth above are true and correct constituting an integral part of this Declaration and are incorporated herein by this reference with the same force and effect as if set forth herein as agreements of the parties. 2. Rules of Construction. The rules of construction as set forth in this Section 2 shall apply to this Declaration: a. Exhibits. Any and all Exhibits cited or referenced in this Declaration or attached to this Declaration are part of this Declaration. b. Titles and Headings. Titles and headings are inserted in this Declaration for reference purposes only and will not be used to interpret this Declaration. C. Sections. All references in this Declaration to "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the corresponding Sections or other subdivisions of this Declaration; the words "in this Declaration," "of this Declaration," "under this Declaration" and other words of similar import refer to this Declaration as a whole and not to any particular Section or subdivision of this Declaration. d. "Including." Whenever the term "includes" or "including" is used in this Declaration, such terms mean "includes by way or example and not limitation" unless otherwise expressly stipulated. e. References. Any references in this Declaration to the masculine shall include the feminine and any reference to the singular shall include the plural and vice versa. 3. Open Space Use. In conjunction with the approval of the zoning changes noted in the Application, Richardson hereby agrees the area shown on Exhibit A as "Open Space" and described in Exhibit E, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, is to be used in those manners specified as an "OS open space district" pursuant to the zoning regulations of the City. The following uses are prohibited within the Property designated as "Open Space": a. Dumping of trash, waste or offensive materials or the creation of a Junkyard of any kind shall be expressly prohibited. PAGE 2 The location of off -premises outdoor advertising shall be expressly prohibited. C. Where the OS district is used as a buffer zone, all such areas shall remain in their natural state unless otherwise approved by the City. d. In no case shall a buffer of OS zoning be less than fifty (50) feet wide. Notwithstanding the zoning regulations, the following uses are expressly permitted within the Property designated as "Open Space": a. Recreational use by adjacent residents. b. Construction of walks, walking paths, parks and playgrounds. C. Crossing with underground utilities in a manner so as to minimize the disturbance to existing vegetation and work necessary to maintain underground utilities. Similar crossing with access drives as permitted by the City and FEMA. d. Additional planting of trees and vegetation to enhance the function of the buffer. Work authorized by the City for any necessary maintenance related to storm drainage. 4. Residential Use Space. In conjunction with the approval of the zoning changes noted in the Application, Richardson hereby agrees the area shown on Exhibit A as "Proposed Single Family Residential" and described in Exhibit F, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, is to be "Residential" and may not be used for "Multifamily" or any residential use with a density of greater than 6 residences or units per acre. Within this area shown as "Proposed Single Family Residential," allowable uses include: a. Detached homes, which shall conform with the allowed uses in the Little Rock Zoning Code for the "R-2 Single-family district," as noted in Section 36-254 of the Little Rock Code. Additionally, there shall be a fifty (50) foot buffer between any residences developed within the area shown as Single Family Residential and houses included in Brodie Creek POA and Woodland's Edge. Any lots sold by Richardson within the Proposed Single Family Residential shall have a minimum width of eighty-five (85) feet. Also, no trees shall be cleared within twenty-five (25) feet of any existing water features located on the current subdivisions for the purposes of construction. However, trees may be removed as necessary if determined tree is diseased or dead or for utility or water line purposes. 5. Mixed Use. In conjunction with the approval of the zoning changes noted in the Application, Richardson hereby agrees the area shown on Exhibit A as "Proposed Non Residential Use" and described in Exhibit G, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, is PAGE 3 to be "Mixed Use" and shall be used for any use approved by the City of Little Rock except it shall not be used for "Multi -Family" housing of any density above more than 6 home/units per acre. However, the foregoing restriction on "Multi -Family" housing shall not restrict the property to be developed for the following uses: a. Nursing Home, Convalescent Homes or Assisted Living Facilities; b. Attached residential homes/units if the project has a density less than 6 home/units per acre. 6. Additional Conditions. In conjunction with the approval of the zoning changes noted in the Application, Richardson hereby agrees to the following conditions: a. All boundary street improvements on Bowman Road adjacent to the Property will be completed prior to the rental of the first unit of any Multi- family units constructed in the area noted in the Application. Richardson shall use best efforts to obtain right-of-way for the construction and development of a roundabout at the intersection of South Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Drive. As used in this paragraph, "best efforts" means attempting to negotiate in good faith with property owners a reasonable price for the purchase of a right-of-way. The determination of a reasonable price shall be in the sole judgment of Richardson. However, if Richardson is unable to obtain a reasonable price for the purchase of right-of-way, Richardson agrees to work with the City to obtain such right-of-way by eminent domain. b. Any part of the Property adjacent to Bowman Road will not be cleared or graded until such property is part of a development plan under construction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, certain portions of the Property adjacent to Bowman Road may be cleared in order to construct street improvements as noted in this Section 6. The development with the area shown on Exhibit A as containing multi- family housing will be constructed only as the market dictates and no faster than the following schedule: i. 120 units occupied beginning in June of 2017. ii. 96 units occupied beginning in June of 2018. iii. 96 units occupied beginning in June of 2019. iv. 96 units occupied beginning in June of 2020. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Richardson shall not be obligated to construct any buildings or develop the Property in any manner. However, in the event Richardson, or its successors or assigns, develops the Property, it shall be developed in conformity with this Declaration. With PAGE 4 regards to the foregoing development of units, any units not constructed in any one year shall be added to the units allowed for construction in subsequent years. 7. Breach. The Board of Directors of the Brodie Creek POA and Woodlands Edge and the owners of the The Pointe Property and Phase III Property, and their successors and assigns, shall have a right to seek an injunction with regards to any condition or restriction contained in this Declaration. 8. Rights of Successors. The restrictions, benefits and obligations hereunder shall create mutual benefits and servitudes running with the land. This Declaration shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Board of Directors of Brodie Creek POA and Woodlands Edge, and the owners of The Pointe Property and Phase III Property, their respective heirs, representatives, lessees, successors and assigns. However, once a portion of the Property is developed consistent with the uses noted in this Declaration, such use shall be deemed allowed, and the owner of such the portion of Property shall not be subject to any action, obligation or condition with regards to such use; provided, such covenants, obligations and conditions shall still be in effect if the portion of the Property is redeveloped to a nonconforming use pursuant to this Declaration. 9. Modification and Cancellation. This Declaration (including exhibits) may be modified or canceled only by the written agreement of Richardson, the owners of The Pointe Property and Phase III Property, and the vote of a majority of the members of Brodie Creek POA at a meeting held as defined in its bylaws and the vote of the majority of the members of Woodlands Edge at a meeting held as defined in its bylaws filed of record in the Office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Officio of Records of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Richardson is mindful of the decision in Rausch Coleman Homes, LLC v. Breech, 2009 Ark. App. 225 (the "Decision") and does not wish for the Decision to limit the ability of Brodie Creek and other parties to amend this Declaration at any time and from time -to -time and choose, to the fullest extent allowed by law, to be governed by Act 185 of 2011. Richardson intents that this Declaration may be amended by Richardson, the owners of The Pointe Property and Phase III Property, and the majority of the members of Brodie Creek POA at a meeting held as defined by its bylaws and a majority of the members of Woodlands Edge POA at a meeting held as defined in its bylaws as set forth above at any time from the date hereof throughout the term of this Declaration and expressly intends and agrees that this Declaration may be so amended prior to any expiration or termination date set forth herein. 10. Duration. All covenants, rights, and obligations contained herein shall run with and bind the Property, shall be and remain in effect, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Board of Directors of Brodie Creek POA and Woodlands Edge and the owner or owners of The Pointe Property and Phase III Property, and their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns for a period of ten (10) years commencing on the date this Declaration is filed of record, unless otherwise amended or terminated as provided herein. Thereafter, said covenants, rights and obligations shall automatically extend for successive ten (10) year periods, unless otherwise amended or terminated as provided herein. 11. Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be mailed by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, PAGE or by Federal Express, Airborne Express, or similar overnight delivery service, addressed as follows: Richardson: Richardson Properties, LLC With a copy to: Timothy W. Grooms, Esq. Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull, PLLC I I I Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, AR 72201 The Pointe: Phase III: Brodie Creek POA: Woodlands Edge: Notices shall be effective upon receipt or refusal. 12. Severability. In any provision of this Declaration shall be held to be invalid, inoperative or unenforceable, the remainder of this Declaration shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 13. Choice of Law. This Declaration is governed by the laws of the State of Arkansas. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page Follows.] PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Brodie Creek has executed this Declaration as of the day of , 2016. Richardson Properties, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company Keith Richardson, STATE OF ARKANSAS ) )ss. ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF ) On this day, before me, a Notary Public, duly commissioned, qualified and acting, with and for said County and State, appeared in person the within named Keith Richardson, to me well known, who stated he was the of Richardson Properties, LLC, an Arkansas limited liability company, and was duly authorized in such capacity to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and on behalf of the limited liability company, and further stated and acknowledged he had so signed, executed and delivered the foregoing instrument for the consideration, uses and purposes therein mentioned and set forth. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this day of 12016. Notary Public My commission expires: (SEAL) PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A Depiction of the Property W'6od,10'6ds!4Edqe Community M -4 CD 9) lj T-- x —V 11 d L LIV NIX AAA" MOM ;;X PAGE 8 EXHIBIT B Legal Description of the Property PAGE 9 EXHIBIT C Legal Description of Phase III Property PAGE 10 EXHIBIT D Legal Description of The Pointe Property PAGE 1 I EXHIBIT E Legal Description of Open Space Use Property PAGE 12 EXHIBIT F Legal Description of Residential Use Property PAGE 13 EXHIBIT G Legal Description of Mixed Use Property PAGE 14 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 David Shipley 33 Woodstream Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen, On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Jane Evans 12115 Brodie Creek Trail Little Rock, AR 72211 Re- Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows.. Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input_ Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Jamie Shipley 33 Woodstream Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-❑ - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission ta City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Doug Steward 8 Deerberry Forest Circle Little Rock, AR 72211 Planning Zoning and Subdivision Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-❑ - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Ann Marshall 11 Deerberry Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows.. Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Edward Figarsky 8 Warblers Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Casey Covington 12306 Cherry Laurel Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments —Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 23, 2016 Dan Veach 20 Winterfern Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 8, 2015, Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision - making process. Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments was recommended for approval. The item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. The Board of Directors date is set for June 21, 2016. For additional information, you can contact staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney - Planning Future Land Use Plan Amendments — Walter Malone - Planning Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore - Planning Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James - Planning Land Alteration Variance Request — Vince Floriani — Public Works Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 May 20, 2016 White Daters and Associates Attn. Tamera 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Sirs: This is to advise you that in connection with your request concerning the above referenced file number the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 19, 2016: Approved with conditions. X Recommended approval with conditions. Recommended approval as submitted. Denied your request as submitted. Deferred to the Other: Meeting. This item will be forwarded to the Little Rock Board of Directors for final action. You or your representative will need to be present at the Board of Directors meeting to address any questions which may arise. The meeting date has tentatively been set for June 21, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 pm and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, 500 West Markham Street, 2nd floor. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, Donna James, AICP Subdivision Administrator HlL;KORY--HIC.L-•RD CHERRY-LAURELDR. i ® 4 ffr±��1J�m� ��pa �� �•� � ® '�� _. "cry c � A a .o � ��sm ,+s vCJd a � wo +� p ��OM �v �$ �� �' ..o f3Ya �ulg S� F5B aWOODSGATEUR m ci as " GILBERTDR—� Mw m © v zLl4¢% e s a ] WOOD ��°� ��� �� ® CO�' �EbAR SPRfNGS Rb� LAND ®� ®� db� �a c�• . r . fg N10rrMoss���`TRC ����� "� �a a v �ammdmy m do la Ej a a � ® v 9 a This A ra�Qra�q � •. ��� Site Afiza 'IdolIL Egg (rrQRMIq ow ®M ® r PD-R ' � ��`•'���•H4 � e..--_ � r1 a 'mom I r J AF a 0 02 Cl o � 00 '� CUP W. 36TW ST �m Ml OS � f Area Zoning C2 11 1021 Case: Z-8503-D Location: West of Bowman Road, between Brodie Creek Subdivision and Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Ward- 6 PD: 18 0 225450 900 Feet CT: 42.07 TRS: T1 N R13W17 %401 MW CHERRY --LAUREL: 40 i 61?a pWDODSGATE°DR ° • Arab �g �1pL 5-- L �[knC§cS �® � 'v cYCRE �� �� �6 �� s in MM R _.._.. Cify Limits ..._ Ku ------- i El P Ef RE a GILSERT DR—® p � old This Site a 4® Er "1®®4,,P3G-�"ylesaRwGa� H(QKORY-'HICL•RD t3� N� sm � �z jai O.V eon a�D C9 d GVa MJN s 49 ;ce A8 in Ok � t'•'.- r EDAR�I5PRIIYGS ig40 �ermr��ro e�19we"Q = ®�la®® NUB EL El E ti EM lee SO p � MpCo 936TkST — Q � du ®. OHO PK/Os ~ MOC Land Use Plan Case: Z-8503-D jV Location: West of Bowman Road, between Brodie Creek Subdivision and Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Ward- 6 0 225450 900 Feet PD: 18 CT: 42.07 TRS: T1 N R13W17 Proposed Residential Proposed 0-1 F [iilLllIILWLlI1llI111WlII >` qr,�. Z-8503—D 0 W OFI K HEIAN ROADNGFROM PD-R PD—R " City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 David Shipley 33 Woodstream Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail dames littlerock.or . Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 Jane Evans 12115 Brodie Creek Trail Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail diamesglittierock.org. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Vttle Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 Jamie Shipley 33 Woodstream Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail diames@littlerock.org. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission ta City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 June 1, 2016 Doug Steward 8 Deerberry Forest Circle Little Rock, AR 72211 Planning Zoning and Subdivision Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen - On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail djames@littlerock.org. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock t= Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 June 1, 2016 Ann Marshall 11 Deerberry Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail diames E ittlerock.org. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 Edward Figarsky 8 Warblers Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail diamesWittlerock.or_q. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 Casey Covington 12306 Cherry Laurel Little Rock, AR 72211 Re Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail James cx littfero_ck.orq. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 Dan Veach 20 Winterfern Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Citizen - On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the May 18, 2016, Commission meeting. You were mailed a notice on May 23, 2016, stating the item was to be on the agenda before the Little Rock Board of Directors on June 21, 2016. The City Manager has elected to not place this item on the agenda for the June 21st meeting and has placed the item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our office at 501.371.4790 or e-mail diames@littlerock.org. Sincerely, Tony Bozynski Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 1, 2016 White Daters and Associates Attn. Tamera 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Z-8503-D - Herrick Heights Long -form PD-R, located on the west side of Bowman Road between the Brodie Creek Subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek Apartments Dear Sirs: You were previously notified of a date and time for this item to be heard by the Little Rock Board of Directors. The City Manager has elected to place this item on the Board of Directors agenda for July 19, 2016. The item will not be heard on June 21st as previously stated. You or your representative will need to be present at the Board of Directors meeting to address any questions which may arise. The meeting begins at 6:00 pm and is held in the Board of Directors Chambers, 500 West Markham Street, 2nd floor. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, Donna James, AICP Subdivision Administrator JOHN BARROW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Working To Build Stronger Communities November 19,2015 Ms. Donna James Department of Planning City of Little Rock 500 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Ref: Development Proposed for Brodie Creek Area (Keith Richardson) Ms. James: Members of the John Barrow Neighborhood Association discussed this proposed development at our last meeting and it was decided to be in NON SUPPORT of this item. Our primary reasoning behind this decision is the fact Mr. Richardson has been to our meetings and asked for our support of another development on Bowman, which is in the process of being built, almost directly across from one of his previous developments of which we did support. However, with his already existing development, proposed new development and another new development to the south of 36th street on Bowman along with property at Shackelford and 36th recently being rezoned for apartments, we feel this is certainly going to have an impact on this area with increased traffic of which Bowman and 36th streets are not equipped to handle the increased volume. Also, we want affordable housing, however, we do not want to become an apartment community where things are nice now, but what about 10 years from now, will we look like Baseline Road or some of the other areas of the city with vacant eyesores and undesirable activities should properties be sold. Page Two: Proposed Apartment Development (Keith Richardson) Therefore, we as a membership for the John Barrow Area, neighbors of Brodie Creek, Kensington, Twin Lakes and residents of the City of Little Rock CANNOT SUPPORT THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. Sincerely, Carolyn Heitman Carolyn Heitman, President John Barrow Neighborhood Association CH/ sb Cc: file James, Donna From: Jane Jones <JJones@arcf.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 3:38 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Rezoning Application Z-8503-D, Keith Richardson Development, Proposed Apartments on South Bowman Road Attachments: 2016 0511 Planning Commission.docx Date: May 11, 2016 From: Jane and Dave Jones 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Re: Rezoning Application Z-8503-D Keith Richardson Development Proposed Apartments on South Bowman Road To: All Little Rock Planning Commission Members: My wife and I are writing to voice our concern and definite objection to further apartment development in our area which would include South Bowman Road and Kanis Road (between Bowman and Chenal Parkway). We strongly encourage all Little Rock Planning Commission Members to deny this request from Mr. Keith Richardson. Unfortunately, our Brodie Creek POA President over -stepped his bounds by stating (whether written, verbal or implied) that our neighborhood was in agreement with the proposed rezoning. As a 15-year resident of Brodie Creek we are very concerned with the increased traffic, with safety, and with the effect that so many apartment units will have on our property values, as well as the subsequent impact in selling our homes. As a resident of Brodie Creek our home sits just beside the neighborhood pond, in the front part of the neighborhood which is closest to Bowman Road. The traffic on Bowman is already heavy and at times dangerous. We can see Bowman Road from our front porch and cannot tell you how many times cars run off the road and into the ditch. We have even had cars end up in our neighborhood pond. Getting out of Brodie Creek in the morning can be difficult. It's not always easy to turn left onto Bowman (or left onto Kanis if exiting from Woodlands Edge). I feel certain more apartments will hurt our property value; there are already an enormous number of new apartment projects in the area. As nice as new apartments are now, it's only a matter of time before they're no longer the "cool" place to live and I feel certain they'll negatively impact the hundreds of hard working residents and families of Brodie Creek, Woodlands Edge, Cherry Creek and Sand Piper. We appreciate your very serious consideration in this matter. My wife and I hope that you will agree to vote against rezoning of this property and not allow ANY further apartments to be built in our area. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us at 501-227-0239. Respectfully submitted, Dave Jones and Jane Jones 1 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock AR 72211 Jane Jones - Program Officer Arkansas Community Foundation 1400 W. Markham, Suite 206 • Little Rock, AR 72201 501-372-1116 (office) • 501-372-1166 (fax) www.arcf.orf Smart Giving to Improve Communities Date: May 11, 2016 From: Jane and Dave Jones 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Re: Rezoning Application Z-8503-D Keith Richardson Development Proposed Apartments on South Bowman Road To: All Little Rock Planning Commission Members: My wife and I are writing to voice our concern and definite objection to further apartment development in our area which would include South Bowman Road and Kanis Road (between Bowman and Chenal Parkway). We strongly encourage all Little Rock Planning Commission Members to deny this request from Mr. Keith Richardson. Unfortunately, our Brodie Creek POA President over -stepped his bounds by stating (whether written, verbal or implied) that our neighborhood was in agreement with the proposed rezoning. As a 15-year resident of Brodie Creek we are very concerned with the increased traffic, with safety, and with the effect that so many apartment units will have on our property values, as well as the subsequent impact in selling our homes. As a resident of Brodie Creek our home sits just beside the neighborhood pond, in the front part of the neighborhood which is closest to Bowman Road. The traffic on Bowman is already heavy and at times dangerous. We can see Bowman Road from our front porch and cannot tell you how many times cars run off the road and into the ditch. We have even had cars end up in our neighborhood pond. Getting out of Brodie Creek in the morning can be difficult. It's not always easy to turn left onto Bowman (or left onto Kanis if exiting from Woodlands Edge). I feel certain more apartments will hurt our property value; there are already an enormous number of new apartment projects in the area. As nice as new apartments are now, it's only a matter of time before they're no longer the "cool" place to live and I feel certain they'll negatively impact the hundreds of hard working residents and families of Brodie Creek, Woodlands Edge, Cherry Creek and Sand Piper. We appreciate your very serious consideration in this matter. My wife and I hope that you will agree to vote against rezoning of this property and not allow ANY further apartments to be built in our area. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at 501-227-0239. Respectfully submitted, Dave Jones 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock AR 72211 Jane Jones Ann Brown Marshall & Anthonv Gri sbv • 11 Deerberry Forest Circle • Little Rock • AR • 72211 501-663-4070 • asbrown aristotle.net May 11, 2016 City of Little Rock Planning and Development Commission Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Commissioners, We're husband and wife, residents of the Brodie Creek neighborhood on South Bowman Road in West Little Rock. In 2012, we moved to this area from central Little Rock to be close to family —and to spoil our two new grandbabies. Attached you'll find a list that encompasses reasoning and suggestions, gleaned from Bowman Road residents in tandem with views of our own, all in relation to the Bowman acreage known as Herrick Heights. That forested land lies immediately south of Brodie Creek, also borders Woodlands Edge, and is very near Sandpiper and Cherry Creek, all well -established Bowman neighborhoods. As you know, last year developer Keith Richardson sought rezoning of that land to build more apartments on it, a bid your agency approved. He then sought approval for other changes from the Little Rock Board of Directors, which prompted that body to refer the matter to you for consideration. That's the impetus for our letter, and why we're asking you to carefully consider it and the attached comments. Circumstances have substantially changed since you agreed to the rezoning Mr. Richardson sought. We believe the current situation warrants reconsidering whether rezoning is indeed reasonable and justified in light of the changed circumstances and upon careful examination of information that may be new to you. Please consider the following points, which are further explicated in the attached list: 1. Official decisions made without Bowman residents' knowledge, involvement, or feedback about proposed changes constitutes a basis for the Commissions to reconsider its rezoning approval. When Mr. Richardson's rezoning request was sought and granted, the residents of neighborhoods most directly affected by that rezoning had neither been informed nor in any way involved in the matter of potential rezoning. Any oral or written representations to the Commission that the Bowman neighborhoods had no objection to the rezoning are erroneous. Silence from the neighbors wasn't assent; it was unawareness of what was underway. 2. Institution of the one-year moratorium on building more apartments on Bowman creates time for a targeted study of the area's current development as a basis for future decisions. Several points on the attached pages address the significance and benefits of this very wise, far-sighted "time out" to take stock, reason, and plan. The city Directors voted to allow Richardson to complete the process of requesting rezoning for fear of legal entanglements, but they did not indicate that the process would or would not conclude in his favor. 3. Richardson's latest submission to the Commission is untimely, as is notification to the residents. Today, May 11, our comments to the Commission are due per directions from your staff; however, only yesterday did we receive notification of the three particulars of the developer's latest proposal. (As you'll read, residents have seen a parade of "concession" offers, none of which have remained constant). We residents were notified of Richardson's submission via a helpful email from Commission staff sent to a Brodie Creek resident who then posted it on a Bowman neighborhood facebook page yesterday, May 10. There is no way to gauge how many residents have seen that post, but most are likely unaware of it as visits to the facebook page are neither universal nor constant. 4. Richardson's latest three-part proposal is unclear as to whether it is complete, that is, continues to contain earlier offers extended to entice Bowman residents to withdraw opposition to more apartments. The submission specifies "three new items we have agreed to include" and then lists the three. Agreed with whom? And included with what? Does this offer negate all the previous enticements, or is it gravy on top of them? Exactly what has Richardson put on the table this time? Residents have grown very weary and leery of Richardson's tactics: vacillating between bullying and threatening the neighborhoods, either preceded or followed by attempts to woo with incentives such as woods buffers; building only 200 apartments instead of the original 408; then only 300 instead of 408; (is the number now back to 408?); touting a roundabout on Bowman to benefit users of the Bowman/Brodie Creek Trail intersection, now apparently abandoned in favor of a potential down payment on a signal light. (However, the Peters traffic study commissioned by Richardson reads that a signal at this intersection isn't currently warranted, but it would be warranted if Richardson were allowed to complete the 408 apartments on his timetable of four years, meaning in 2020. So, Bowman warrants a light only if Richardson builds 408 more apartments. That's seen as a sorry trade on more than one level, including the fact that $100,000 isn't likely to buy and install a complete signal system.) The bullying and threats have been the most manipulative and egregious, calculated to generate fears that could create divisiveness among residents. Prime example: Our Brodie Creek POA president notified those residents present at last week's Annual POA Meeting that we would again be asked to vote acceptance of Richardson's Plan A or Plan B, both of which have included 408 apartments but have other differing features. Brodie Creek went through this same voting exercise some time ago, and the neighborhood soundly rejected more apartments in any form. However, Richardson has publicly vowed that, despite all obstacles, he's determined to build his Herrick apartments. He also has been clear that he wants Plan A, but he invented Plan B (known locally as the "revenge plan") because it not only included 408 units but also a much higher number of houses that are small and on narrow lots, along with a commercial building, possibly a nursing home or an office building that could be multi -story. Residents who feared their property values would sink like the Titanic chose Plan A, even if their heart wasn't in that decision. Nevertheless, the majority of residents accepted neither plan, so the vote was not in Richardson's favor. At this time, the Bowman neighbors are at a loss to understand exactly what Richardson is offering and whether (and when) those of us in Brodie Creek are expected to vote again —a procedure few want to repeat. Trust in both the person and the process has crumbled in the face of overall lack of good faith. Thank you very much for your careful consideration of our Bowman neighborhoods' requests, proposals, and comments. Most of all, thank you each one for your work on behalf of all Little Rock citizens. Sincerely yours, Ann and Anthony Grigsby Rezoning for More Apartments on Bowman: Does It Make Sense for Little Rock? Points to Carefully Consider Lack of residents' awareness and involvement We who live in the neighborhoods most directly affected by rezoning on Bowman were initially completely ignored and intentionally left out of the information flow regarding potential rezoning of "Herrick Heights." To Bowman residents living in Brodie Creek, Woodlands Edge, Sandpiper, Sandpiper West, and Cherry Creek, the three new apartment developments on So. Bowman were a total surprise: 503 completed units as The Pointe at Brodie Creek; 500 units going up across the street as Bowman Pointe (both Keith Richardson complexes); and 250 units under construction at the south end of Bowman near Col. Glenn. The POA boards of both Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge knew but failed to inform their respective neighborhood residents that they, the board members, had privately met with Richardson to hear his sales pitch for rezoning to allow him even more apartments. The Bowman Road neighborhood residents were circumvented and disenfranchised by deliberately withheld information. Residents were unaware of the Planning Commission meeting at which rezoning was requested by Richardson and then approved by Commissioners who saw no opposition from the local neighborhoods. Meeting minutes show inaccurate representations: false claims that residents had been informed about the rezoning request, were aware of the Planning Commission meeting, and had no objections as demonstrated by lack of attendance at the meeting. On the contrary, we had no idea what was happening behind our collective backs. Overloaded infrastructure An overriding concern about adding even more apartments on Bowman and Kanis Roads is the additional burden they'll place on an already badly strained infrastructure. Before approving more high -density population pockets to develop, the city needs to determine the total current and projected population and traffic in this area along with adequacy of: condition, capacity, and safety of local roads (especially Bowman and Kanis), traffic patterns, including feeder and cut -through routes; maintenance services; drainage and flood control; police, traffic, and fire protection; effect on local schools of sudden influx school -age populations; and all emergency services. No bus service This part of town isn't served by metropolitan buses (Rock Region Metro), and the recently defeated sales tax proposal leaves Metro managers the challenge of potentially realigning routes without new funding. Bowman and W. Kanis have no bicycle lanes or sidewalks. Without bus service, residents must own a vehicle or have access to one, thereby augmenting local traffic. The only other option is to risk a very long —and dangerous —walk to commercial areas on North Bowman or Col. Glenn. Give the moratorium time to work for the community. The one-year moratorium the City Board so wisely chose for Bowman is an opportunity to "press the refresh button" for a broad, thoughtful look at all the variables at work in the Bowman/Kanis corridors. Then decisions and directions can be based on solid data and experience as the 750 additional apartments under construction on Bowman come online during the year. The study will assess the effect the 1,253 Bowman units are having on the area, revealing whether building any more apartments makes sense —before granting rezoning to add as many as 408 more units as requested on Herrick Heights. Short-cut traffic overload The swollen traffic levels on Bowman and Kanis in our area have produced a high volume of cut -through traffic in Brodie Creek (BC) and Woodlands Edge (WE), with many of the pass -through vehicles traveling at dangerously high speeds. BC has a single entrance/exit road (BC Trail) and WE has a single entrance/exit road (WE Trail), but the two "trails" meld into each other, creating one continuous road that winds between Bowman and Kanis through the two neighborhoods. The only exit/entrance outlet for BC and WE is either via the single one on Bowman or the single one on Kanis. More and more drivers use this short-cut to circumvent the traffic on Bowman and Kanis and especially the traffic backup at the Bowman/Kanis intersection. Builders' road improvements are a patchwork Richardson touts the road improvements he makes along his developments' frontage, a claim that's correct but results in patches of widened road along Bowman. These changes affect only a small portion of the road's length from the intersection of Bowman at Kanis southward to Col. Glenn. Will such piecemeal enhancements fit into a master road plan designed for the length of an increasingly traffic -burdened Bowman, ensuring it's adequate for those who drive, bicycle, and walk the road? Improvements must precede more development At the very least, So. Bowman and West Kanis Road (both narrow, winding roads without sidewalks or bike lanes and with long stretches of ditches for shoulders) must be improved and widened before additional residential traffic further increases the danger to all travelers, including motor vehicles, bicyclists, walkers, and runners. The developers apparently adhere to the adage, "Build it and they will come!" Our observation is, "Build it and they won't be able to come because they're stuck in traffic or lying injured on the side of the road." Infrastructure now, new development later. No money for road improvements City officials say no money is available to improve Bowman Road, neither currently nor in the near future (perhaps some in 2019), yet traffic on Bowman is already overcrowding the two-lane roadway. The newest complete unit of 503 apartments (The Pointe) will soon be joined by more apartments under construction, as noted above. The sum is 1,253 units, whose tenants will be driving South Bowman. If the rezoning Richardson seeks is granted, and if he builds 408 more units, then 1,661 apartment renters will put at least as many cars on Bowman, but likely a much higher number. The moratorium study will show the feasibility and wisdom of rezoning to allow any more apartment units. Up -front infrastructure Many cities have developed alternative approaches to funding roadway improvements needed to accommodate new development. Please consider options that keep commercial developers paying for the road/infrastructure improvements, but shift the actual road enhancement process to the city, thus keeping such upgrades squarely within the city's control —and thus in line with the city's overall vision and plan for growth. Allowing high -density development within an area requires infrastructure in place to support that development before it's built, not afterward when more buildings and increased traffic pose additional challenges, time, and expense. 2 Preventing problems makes dollars and sense As a city, we're always going to face challenges of one sort or another. Haven't we learned that it's a lot smarter and usually easier and cheaper to prevent problems rather than allowing them to develop —or worse, helping them to develop or intensify? Rezoning single-family spaces into apartment complexes in an area with already - overloaded infrastructure exacerbates problems already begging for solutions and financing. Bowman residents are neither anti -development nor anti -apartment. We're for balanced growth within the context of the city's overall plan for progress. Residents have always known Bowman and Kanis roads would continue to grow, but we've relied on the city's planners and zoning plan to control and balance that growth. Now over 1,250 apartment units are open —or are about to open --on So. Bowman alone. On nearby Kanis (an entrance/exit for Woodlands Edge neighbors) and beyond into the proximate area of Chenal Pwy, thousands more apartments are operational, under construction, or being planned. A recent Planning & Development map shows some 4,200 apartment units within a tight Bowman-Kanis-Chenal radius. Such a concentration of high -density housing is benefitting developers at the risk of destabilizing established neighborhoods —and overburdening infrastructure. Over -building apartments is dangerous to the vitality of any city. Currently, the West Little Rock apartment market is "hot," and developers are hasty to capitalize on that market --while it lasts. History shows that heated markets invariably cool, leaving apartment complexes with declining occupancy rates. In too many instances, as the census of a complex falls, so does income to the owner; as a result, upkeep and renewal slide —as do property values, and thus taxes paid to the city. Less appealing units can draw less responsible tenants, so units likely endure more damage; on -site crime rates tend to climb. It's a familiar downward spiral, well known across the nation and right here in Little Rock. Developers make big money —then sell their declining complexes and move on. Who loses? The list includes the nearby neighborhood home owners whose property values have dropped; the city, which faces budget cuts due to falling tax revenues; and the people who move into outmoded, deteriorating apartments that were once "high end." Drainage problems at Bowman Pointe construction Originally covered with the same thick decades old pine -and -hardwood forest as the land known as Herrick Heights, this extensive swath of acreage was clear-cut, the tall trees bulldozed and burned on site, and the hilly terrain completely leveled into a barren moonscape. The hills and overflow areas were leveled with apparently such little regard for contouring to promote drainage that flooding on the adjacent areas of both 36th St. and Bowman can be extreme during heavy rains. (Photos have been posted online by neighbors struggling to navigate these flooded roads.) Perhaps this lack of adequate drainage is among the reasons Richardson was anxious to acquire the 13 acre overflow offset on Herrick Heights. However, Richardson has admitted he plans the same scorched -earth treatment of his newly acquired Bowman land. Will runoff from more denuded acreage be successfully diverted from the adjacent Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge neighborhoods? 3 Herrick Heights best serves the city as zoned for single-family homes, in keeping with the established neighborhoods it borders. The winding, country road that is South Bowman is access to a diversity of dwellings (now including apartment complexes) with residents who value the remaining green spaces and scenic vistas. Its verdant, rural feel is a great attraction to both home buyers and renters. Preserving the homey neighborhood feel and that green appeal benefits both this area and greater Little Rock. Richardson didn't own the land when he sought rezoning for Herrick Heights. But he does now, as of April 2016 and purportedly at a cost of $3.6 million for some 73 acres of forested hills. This developer isn't only the proud builder of over 70 apartment complexes, but apparently also a speculator whose determination to build 17 add -on apartment units trumped his secure option -to - buy -upon -rezoning arrangement with the seller —and perhaps also overruled his business logic. One is left to wonder whether undisclosed motives or needs lie behind this rushed and costly business risk. Or was the purpose a calculation that land ownership would influence decision - makers in his favor, since he could claim that denials or delays would jeopardize his solvency? Preserve housing diversity on So. Bowman Located on the west side of So. Bowman near the intersection of Col. Glenn is a modest but serviceable trailer park, which for many years has provided low-cost housing for working families. Lining South Bowman are also small businesses, single-family homes, open pastures, woodlands, and wetlands, all worth protecting from piecemeal apartment complex developments. Please take a drive down South Bowman to personally observe why the scarring of the landscape has Bowman and Kanis residents pleading for city planners to support thoughtful growth rather than fragmented commercial opportunism. Uneven emphasis on WLR growth Is the city encouraging development in West LR while ignoring the housing needs of East LR, SWLR, and various other parts of town? When builders advertise "high -end" apartments, the target is usually predominantly white residents. Other parts of town need and merit comfortable modern housing, too, for citizens of all races and ethnicity. For years, our city has dealt with the very real challenge of racial equity. Don't city leaders, planners, and citizens have an obligation to fairly encourage and assist equitable development in all parts of town? Diversity impact So many of us have worked for decades to help our citizens learn to live together instead of congregating in racially/ethnically identifiable neighborhoods. Approving the development of "high -end" and "upscale" complexes (words emphasized in Richardson's promotions) and concentrating such developments in specific areas helps to pull us backward, not propel us forward into a much -preferred diverse future. School assignment zones School -age children residing in Bowman Road apartments are zoned into LRSD schools: David O. Dodd Elementary, Henderson Middle School, and JA Fair High School. While these schools currently have capacity to accept new students, a sudden influx of unanticipated enrollment creates very significant staffing and budgeting challenges for the school district. 4 May 11, 2016 City of Little Rock Planning Commissioners 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Subject: Rezoning Request Bowman Road - Z-8503-D Dear Planning Commission Please accept this letter in opposition to the rezoning request (Z-8503-D) for south Bowman Road. Information contained in this letter has been previously provided to the Little Rock Board of Directors. Our opposition to the rezoning is based upon the cumulative traffic/infrastructure impacts of this and other recently approved projects in the vicinity of Bowman Road and the concentration of large multi -family complexes in the vicinity of Bowman and Kanis Roads. As you are aware, Bowman Road south of Kanis is a narrow two lane (formally county) roadway that is inconsistent with the intensity of development that is being planned and constructed. Lengthy queues already exist in the morning and afternoon on Bowman Road and this is prior to the completion and full occupation of apartments immediately south and west of the proposed rezoning. These traffic queues make it difficult for residents to enter and exit neighborhoods along Bowman Road and may well impact the response time of emergency vehicles. Residents are forced to turn across stopped traffic resulting in an unavoidable danger. We would like to thank the city for recognizing this problem and providing funding for the widening of Kanis Road between Gamble and Shackleford Road; however it is our understanding that the current allotment is insufficient to complete this project and no funding is provided for improvements to Bowman Road. We would urge the Planning Commission to limit new developments along Kanis and Bowman Roads until additional roadway improvements (half street or city funded) are completed that address these traffic concerns. We are also concerned over the adequacy of other city infrastructure (police, fire, parks, water, sewer) given the expected development in the area. The recently approved large scale apartments on Bowman Road south and west of this rezoning and Kanis Road near its intersection with Cooper Orbit have added significantly to the availability of multi -family units available in this area of Little Rock. The over concentration of large scale multi -family complexes is likely to have a long lasting and negative impact to this area of Little Rock and its surrounding residential neighborhoods and is inconsistent with the vision of the area by surrounding residents. This exact sentiment and the likely impact to development patterns was expressed by city staff to the planning commission during the original request for rezoning in October. Staff is not supportive of the applicant's request. There has been a large amount of multi family zoning and development in this immediate area within the past twelve months..... Staff feels the addition of multi family in this area will have a significant impact on the future development pattern of this area. We do commend the city and its efforts to create a multi -use zone in this area of Little Rock and would welcome new office, retail, and diverse housing options as infrastructure improvements are made. While this area of Little Rock needs additional housing options, it does not need additional large scale over concentrated apartment complexes. We urge you to support existing neighborhoods and the recommendation/concerns of city staff (October) and vote NO on the rezoning request Z-8503-D. We further request that you open the full application up for consideration of the commission on the premises the that the depth of public opposition was not known during the commission's November vote and that it is the Planning Commission's responsibility to consider the cumulative impacts of the entire development, not individual parts as revised. Lacie F. Covington, MBA Casey R. Covington, PE, AICP Cherry Laurel Drive James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 7:30 AM To: James, Donna; Floriani, Vince; Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: Z-8503-D Information From: Jane Evans [mailto:janeinre@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2016 9:28 AM To: Alan Bubbus <dabubbus@ualr.edu>; Becky Finney <becky@beckyfinney.com>; Beulah Bynum <laydbeejay@gmail.com>; Bill May <bmay37@sbcglobal.net>; Craig Berry <caberry@swbell.net>; Carney, Dana <DCarney@little rock.org>; Janet Dillon <jd@wilcompany.com>; Jennifer Belt <jennifermbelt@gmail.com>; Keith Cox <keith.cox@bxs.com>; Scott Hamilton <sdanhl@gmail.com>; Troy Lala <lahaengrls@sbcgloba1.net>; Paul Latture <platture@yahoo.com> Subject: Z-8503-D Information It is beautiful today so if you are out and near Bowman Road, I hope that you will take the opportunity to drive from Kanis Road to Colonel Glenn so that you can better evaluate Z-8503-D. You will be able to see the size, the condition and layout of Bowman Road. (Director Wyrick said that she was on Bowman on a Saturday around 3:30 and that it was very congested). The Developer is proposing a roundabout at the intersection Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail and you will be able to evaluate this to see if the roundabout is feasible. With the apartments that Mr. Richardson already has and the ones that he is building on the East and West side of Bowman there will be approximately 3,300 cars on Bowman each day, if each car makes one trip per day, (1100 x 1.5 x 2). This is how one resident explained it to me. "A roundabout would only help for those exiting Brodie Creek onto Bowman, but it wouldn't help traffic on Bowman and might even be a safety hazard for drivers who aren't expecting it. But with all the blind curves on Bowman, a traffic light - which will happen eventually - might be dangerous too, since drivers might come around a curve without knowing there's a line of cars backed up at a red light. There would need to be flashing warning lights installed prior to the curve." Adding 408 more apartments to Bowman Road will only intensive the problems that we already, so I hope that you will consider this carefully. Thank you for the job that you do. Jane Evans It was my understanding that Brodie Creek A Place to Call Home Keith Richardson Keith Richardson Companies 9800 Maumelle Blvd. North Little Rock, AR 72113 Mr. Richardson, Board of Directors Kevin Yarbrough, President Doug Steward, Vice President Marc Haynes, Treasurer Jenny Thiltgen, Secretary Jerry Straessle, Member May 17, 2016 The purpose of this letter is to fulfill a second request made to the Brodie Creek Property Association Board of Directors (BCPOA) for a position statement regarding the proposed mixed use development and re -zoning of property adjacent to the Brodie Creek neighborhood (BC) along South Bowman Road. The first request was fulfilled in February 2016 and reflected a majority vote, from the residents, opposing the planned development. Since that time, you have acquired the property and development is inevitable. BCPOA would like to reiterate the overall neighborhood opinion is that there is not enoup,h infrastructure along Bowman Road to support the planned development. Regarding the current request; the BCPOA invited the 82 property owners of BC to participate in a survey to obtain the majority opinion. Residents were asked to consider the following information and guarantees made/provided by you to the BCPOA: • A proposed development map. • In exchange for BCPOA's support of the planned development, Richardson Properties guarantees the following: o Reduction in the number of apartments from 408 to 312, o Apartments to be positioned on the southwest corner of the property and not visible from Brodie Creek, o The placement of $100,000 towards placing a traffic signal or roundabout at the intersection of Brodie Creek Trail and Bowman Road in escrow for a period of 5 years from approval the proposal. o A minimum of 50 feet of green space between BC property and the proposed single family residential homes. o The development of similarly sized lots and homes to those within BC and Woodlands Edge. The opinion poll resulted the following: 36 For, 16 Against, 4 No Opinion and the Abstention of 26. Therefore, the BCPOA supports the re -zoning of the property adjacent to the BC neighborhood based upon the aforementioned conditions/guarantees and reservation. Thank you, Brodie Creek Property Owner's Board of Directors Cc: City of Little Rock Board of Directors City of Little Rock Planning Commission Residents of Brodie Creek James, Donna From: Cindy Dawson <dawcin@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 2:07 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Mr. Keith Richardson's development on S. Bowman Dear Planning Commissioners and Planning and Public Works Staff: I am writing this letter of support for the proposed development by Mr. Keith Richardson on South Bowman Road. My husband and I live in the Brodie Creek Subdivision. Mr. Richardson has been flexible and willing to meet several times with our neighborhood to hear and address the neighborhood's concerns. His existing apartment development on Bowman is of exceptionally high quality, and he has agreed to several conditions that make the proposed additional development appealing. We know that development is inevitable, so we believe this proposed development will be the best we can hope to have next to our subdivision. The more our neighbors found out about the development, the more in favor of it they have become. My husband and I are hoping to see a roundabout (traffic circle) at the intersection of S. Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail. Our area is familiar with roundabouts, as there are several in Woodlands Edge and beyond. While roundabouts slow traffic to a certain extent, they also keep traffic moving at a good pace, and we think it would be ideal to have one at that location, at least until S. Bowman Road is fully widened. (Another good location for one would be S. Bowman Road and Executive Center Drive.) It would handle rush hour traffic better for all concerned, yet not force a needless wait during other times when there is little traffic, as a traffic light would do. encourage all Planning Commissioners to vote to support the proposed Richardson development. Thank you for your service to the City. Sincerely, Cindy Dawson 8 Brodie Circle Little Rock AR 72211 221-9118 James, Donna From: Jane Evans <janeinre@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:57 PM To: Alan Bubbus; Becky Finney; Beulah Bynum; Bill May; Craig Berry; Carney, Dana; James, Donna; Janet Dillon; Jennifer Belt; Paul Latture; Scott Hamilton; Tony Bozynski; Troy Lala Subject: Re: Brodie Creek Vote On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Jane Evans <janeinreQQmail.com> wrote: I am sending information about the voting that was done regarding Richardson's apartments. In January when we asked to vote Brodie Creek to allow us to vote ,POA Directors would not allow us to vote so we voted by Proxy. The Board would not acknowledge this vote. In February Brodie Creek Directors allowed us to vote for the first time at Mr. Richardson request. In May BC POA allowed us to vote for a second time at Richardson's request. The votes are as follows. January - Proxy 27 total 25 Against 1 abstain 1 For February Of the 54: 13 For 3 Neutral 38 Against May 36 For 16 Against 4 No Opinion 26 Abstention I am concerned about the apartments and about the way that Mr. Richardson and our Board have handled this. A neighbor wrote this to me and I am sharing it and hoping that it helps in your decision. Jane, Thx for taking initiative. You should volunteer for our POA board. "I am concerned that by antagonizing KR, we will lose more, eg, his previous offer to build the traffic circle. I don't think we can totally block his development going up against him at City Planning and Board. " Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: Jane Evans <janeinre@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 9:08 PM To: Alan Bubbus; Becky Finney; Beulah Bynum; Bill May; Craig Berry; Carney, Dana; James, Donna; Janet Dillon; Jennifer Belt; Paul Latture; Scott Hamilton; Tony Bozynski; Troy Lala Subject: Fwd: Brodie Timeline Attachments: outline for dorris.docx I am sending you the timeline showing the steps that my neighbors and I took after we heard about the apartments. The list stopped when we voted and gave the timeline to Director Wright. Residents do not want apartments but they are concerned about what Richardson might do if we do not support his apartments. Thank you. Jane Evans Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Jane Evans cjaneinre(&, mail.com> Date: February 1, 2016 at 12:15:49 PM CST To: board@littlerock.org Subject: Attn Doris Wright, Brodie Timeline Thank you for all of your assistance and time on this matter. If you have any questions, we wil be happy to get them for you. Thanks Again, Jane Evans Dear Doris, My neighbors and I are very concerned about the over saturation of apartments and what that will do to this area and all of Little Rock, now and 10-20 years from now. When I called Director Wright she said that it was important for our neighborhood to vote and present a collective number to the Little Rock Board of Directors. Though we were unable to get the Brodie Creek Board to allow the homeowners to vote, a number of residents concerned about the rezoning of the property met and collaborated on steps to take in order to have their voices and opinions heard. Director Wright asked that I provide the vote and an outline out the steps we took to get the vote: 27 Total Votes 25 Votes against the Rezoning 1 Voted to Abstain 1 For the Apartments • November 16,2015 a Facebook post by a Brodie resident saying that there was another development of apartments • November 18, 2:22, E-mail from Brodie Directors about a meeting that night at 6 p.m. at Woodlands Edge Ctr. to discuss the proposed apts. for Bowman Road. (This was the only notification of the proposal that my neighbors and I received, but it was the second time it would go before the Planning Commission the following day at 4 p.m. • November 18, 6 p.m. Meeting at Woodlands Edge Community Ctr. where approximately 40-45 residents of BC and WE residents met with the US President and Keith Richardson, the developer. Attendees asked why they were not told about the apartments and how the apartments would affect the value of their homes. • November 18, 8:03 p.m., to 11/19, 2:39 p.m. emailed Richardson 3 times asking him for the information about the traffic • November 19, 4:00 P.M. LR Planning Commission met for the second time and voted to approve Richardson's proposal ■ December 4, E-mailed°Brodie Creek President and asked why he supported the apartments. • December 4, Email from Brodie Creek President saying that he did not approve the proposal, but he was ok with it because the land would be used for apartments and this builder built quality apartment • Late December or early January called and spoke with Director Wright, the Director for our area and told her that my neighbors and I were against more apartments in this area. She said the best thing to do was to vote and have the POA president rescind his support for the zoning. • January 6, 9:30 p.m., I wrote the Brodie Creek Board and asked them to call a special meeting, give us information about the apartments and allow us to vote to support or oppose Richardson's proposal and told them that City's vote could be as early as February 2. 1 asked them ■ January 7, 10 A.M. The Board responded and asked me questions about what I was trying to accomplish. • January 7 1 responded by answering their question ■ January 7, Brodie Creek Board wrote again explaining that the property would be multi -family and that Richardson would be the best builder. ■ January 7, 1 wrote back explaining that the property did not have to be multifamily • January, The BC Board did not respond • January 10, an invitation was posted on FB inviting BC residents to meet and decide what steps to take so that we could information about the proposal and allow our neighbors to vote. Since the Board had not responded and the date the City would vote was fast approaching, we read the bylaws and decided that a petition allowing 30 neighbors to sign was our only alternative. • January 11 a petition was drafted ■ January 13 the petition was taken door to door, so that we had the signatures of 30 neighbor on the petition, the number needed to get the Board to call a special meeting, provide the information about the apartments and allow us to vote and get the collective vote for Brodie Creek. (As a courtesy, a phone call was made to the BC president saying that a petition was being passed around to the neighbors.) • January 13, the BC secretary was called so that the petition could be delivered to her. When she did not answer the door, an email was sent to her so that we could deliver the petition, the secretary said that the petition could be delivered the next day, January 14 at 6 p.m. ■ January 14, 3:42 p.m. and Email from BC Board of Directors was received saying that a meeting had been scheduled with Keith Richardson of Richardson Properties on Thursday January 28 at 6:30p.m. at the Clubhouse at the Pointe at Brodie Creek where Keith Richardson will share his proposed apartment plan and answer questions • January 14 at 6 p.m. The petition was delivered to the secretary as stated in the bylaws and at the time the secretary said that it could be delivered. • Reminder from the BC Board of the meeting with Richardson • January 26 the BC directors emailed a reminder of the meeting scheduled for January 28 with Richardson • January 17 Called the President before making flyer to ask about voting at the meeting January 28 meeting. The BC President said that would could vote, but we that was a requirement that we have a specific number of people to vote and we did not have enough. (The petition asked that the Board allow the residents of Brodie Creek to vote) • January18-19 we a made and delivered a flyer, map and proxy form letting neighbors them know about the meeting, giving them the opportunity to vote to support or oppose the apartments. • January 26 Email from BC directors reminding residents of the meeting with Richardson on January 28 • January 28, approximately 40 residents met at the pointe at Brodie Creek. Mr. Richardson presented a power point presentation and answered questions. ■ January 28 The Brodie Creek Officers left half way through the presentation by Richardson • January 28 the attendees of the meeting said that they had never been given the opportunity to vote to support or oppose the apartments until this meeting. (see comments regarding January 18 meeting) • January 19-January 30 People voted by proxy and by handing their vote in at the meeting. • January 28, Director Wright was at the meeting and asked me to send her the outline and vote information ■ January 30 Email from Brodie Creek Directors that clarify recent distribution, flyers, petitions, ballots were not distributed by your elected POA board. • January 31 on Facebook the vice president has said that he is not for apartments There is supporting information for the items on the outline, so if any of it will be helpful in the decision you are making, please contact me. PATRICK MORGAN 7A ROBINWOOD DR. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72227 TEL. 501-221-7377 05-13-2016 DER OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPEMENT 723 W. MARK14AM ST. LITTLE ROCK, AR CASE # Z-8503-D DEAR COMMISSIONERS, AS OWNER OF PROPERTY ON OLDS LANE, LITTLE ROCK, I AM AGAINST REZONING THE TRACTS IN QUESTION. 2. THE AREA IS NOW SATURATED WITH APARTMENTS. 3. I THINK BUILDING MORE APARTMENTS WILL LOWER THE VALUES OF MY PROPERTY AS WELL AS BRODIE CREEK RESIDENCES. 4. I SINCERELY HOPE THAT YOU WILL DENY THIS REZONING. SINCERELY PATRICK RGAN PR TY DISCRIPTION: PT SW SW BG 140'N SW COR E75' S 140'E 145N 330'W220'S190' TO BEG 9 1N 13W Bozynski, Tony From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Dear Director Wright, Carpenter, Tom Friday, March 04, 2016 11:21 AM Director Wright Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana RE: Z-8503-D Fw:Z-8503-D The project was approved by the Planning Commission. The approved project was amended. So, the Planning Commission will focus upon the amendments and whether the project should still be approved with them in place. Technically, the Planning Commission could consider anything that it desires about the project, but I suspect the focus will be on the amendments that were made at the BOD meeting since that is the basic reason the BOD sent it back. Tom Thomas M. Carpenter OFFICE OF THE 'CITY ATTORNEY 500 West Markham, Ste. 310 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (T) (501) 371-6875 (direct) (F) (501) 371-4675 (M) (501) 993-1052 tcarpenter@littlerock.org Bozynski, Tony From: Director Wright Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 11:12 AM To: Carpenter, Tom Subject: Fw: Z-8503-D Tom: Please see the question below from a resident of Brodie Creek. Will the planning commission review the entire project? And can they recommend the project not be approved given the opposition? From: Jane Evans <janeinre@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 10:56 AM To: Wright Doris Subject: Z-8503-D Dear Director Wright, Will the Planning Commission look at specific issues like the Roundabout or will they look at the project as a whole? Thank you. Jane Evans. Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: j c <jacl023@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:27 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-8503-D Donna, Hi, my name is Joe Canalichio and I live in Woodlands Edge very close to this proposed rezoning on Bowman road. I am very much against this going through! We live in Woodlands Edge mainly for the peace and quiet and natural green space all around. We see many wild animals regularly out our back door and in the neighborhood. Since the last major apartment development we regularly hear noise from there and it is much farther away. Additionally the traffic on both Bowman and Kanis leaving our subdivision has increased significantly making it difficult to access these roads. This would add additional stress to an already difficult situation. Why can't it be developed as originally planned, single family? Was it not zoned that way for a reason? Please help us keep our beautiful, peaceful, quiet neighborhood intact. Also these roads are already stressed and can't handle the influx of traffic they will be subjected to. Thank you for your help. Deeply concerned Little Rock resident, Joseph Canalichio. Sent from my iPad James, Donna From: Rhonda <rhondajansen@aol.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:14 PM To: James, Donna Subject: No apartments I am writing this email in hopes of getting more proposed apartments on Kanis and or Bowman Rd denied. The last thing this area needs is more apartments. Traffic is already a nightmare and there are plenty of apartments in the area already. Concerned resident Rhonda Jansen Sent from my Whone James, Donna From: Laura Campbell <II_cool_smith@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 6:02 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Chris Campbell Subject: Apartments Ms James, I wanted to express my disapproval of more apartments being built right next to Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge. Bowman and Kanis are both a nightmare to travel on right now and this will just make it worse. Not to mention that we moved out here for Greenspace - not to live right next to apartments. Please advise. Thanks Laura Campbell Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: Alisha Mattocks <alishamu@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:14 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Project Z-8503-D Hi Donna, I am a fairly new resident of the Woodlands Edge neighborhood. To access our home, we drive on Brodie Creek Trail. I learned today that a new apartment complex is being proposed next to Brodie Creek Trail and near our home as well. I am writing to express my disapproval of this proposal. The area around our neighborhood is already filling with new apartment complexes. The complexes take away from the beauty of the area and ultimately disturb the green space, which is a large part of why we moved to the neighborhood. In addition, the traffic on Bowman Rd. will increase significantly. Turning left on Bowman Rd. from Brodie Creek is difficult during certain times of the day currently. The new complex would certainly add to the issue. I also feel that having a neighborhood surrounded by apartment complexes will decrease the selling value of our home in the future. This area has seen enough apartment complex growth. Please consider the people in our neighborhood and surrounding neighborhoods and help us preserve its beauty. Thank you, Alisha M. Mattocks Woodlands Edge Resident (504)717-6632 James, Donna From: Carol Padgett <carolpadg@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:14 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z8503-D Rezoning of Bowman I am writing in opposition to the proposed plan to rezone land on Bowman for yet MORE apartments. Brody Creek and Woodlands Edge communities are completely opposed to this change. On Kanis at the entrance to Woodlands Edge we have two apartment complexes and a new group of homes being constructed .... adding to an already completed Valero gas station. On the Bowman entrance to our neighborhood, two very large (one for 500 apartments and the other for 600 apartments) complexes have already destroyed acres and acres of greenbelt land and forest. We have enough apartments now!! This entire neighborhood of homes ranging in price from $300,000 to $700,000 are being surrounded by apartments. It is dangerous to turn into Bowman or Kanis now because of the traffic and both are only two lane roads with no plans to widen anytime soon. Don't allow more apartments to damage the property values, safety and roads in our neighborhood. Carol Padgett 32 Woodstream Cove Little Rock, AR 72211 501.312.7176 Home James, Donna From: Kerri Nelson <kerrinelson70@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:07 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Disapproval of Apartment project Z-8503-D To Whom It May Concern, This email is to express our absolute disapproval of project Z-8503-D. There are already a number existing apartment complexes surrounding both Woodlands Edge and Brodie Creek. In addition to this project, there are three other apartment projects currently underway. The traffic is horrendous and infrastructure is struggling to support current population and volume. Please take our personal as well as our communities concerns into consideration. Sincerely, Kent and Kerri Brunen James, Donna From: Melissa Smith <smithmelissa2010@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 5:13 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Donna ... Please Reply!!! Project Z-8503-D Hello Donna, I spoke with the Brodie Creek POA President, Kevin Yarbrough. He said the land in question which is adjacent to Brodie Creek is currently zoned as multi -unit housing. The document I read from the city states this land is currently zoned as single housing. Is that correct? Secondly, my understanding is that the planning commission declined Mr Richardson's request to change zoning from single housing to multi housing and it was denied on Oct 8, 2015. Is this correct? Now, my understanding is that Mr Richardson is appearing before the planning committee again this Thursday, November 19, 2015 to request rezoning to PD-R which would allow Mr Richardson to proceed with his apartment complex projects while also allowing for single family housing. Is that correct? Lastly, my understanding is that a developer could purchase this land now for single family housing, but anyone wishing to purchase the land for other uses would have to request rezoning from Single family to multi or PD- R. Is that correct? I have concerns that S. Bowman is not adequate to handle the additional cars from Mr Richardson's apartments. I see this also as a safety concern for emergency vehicles who may have difficulty entering and exiting BC. Our POA director said the board met with Mr Richardson and they were told the adjacent land is currently zoned as multi property. The board did not feel a need to share this information as "Its not a done deal yet." Clearly, there is miscommunication and I am curious as to why anyone on the BC POA board would want Mr Richardson's development over current zoning of single family homes. Single family homes would not place a huge stress on S. Bowman traffic as opposed to an additional 400 apartment buildings. Single family homes would also be good for BC property values over more apartments. Something doesn't seem right with this. Thank you for replying to my concerns. Best Regards, Melissa Smith Sent from AT&T Mail on Android James, Donna From: Adrienne Baker <jurischick@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 4:27 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Opposition to rezoning request Ms. James, As a homeowner in Woodland's Edge, I write to voice my opposition to a developer's request for rezoning of the area between Brodie Creek and The Pointe apartments on the west side of South Bowman. Multi -family developments are being constructed at a rapid pace on all sides of our safe, quiet neighborhood while road improvements have not kept pace. In the last couple of years, two new apartment complexes have been developed on Kanis adjacent to our neighborhood and two huge apartment complexes have been constructed on Bowman very close to our neighborhood. Traffic on Kanis and Bowman is already an absolute nightmare for many hours of the day and road conditions are rapidly deteriorating. Further, we've seen a marked increase in crime in our neighborhood since these apartments went up, just in the four years I've lived here. Many of us have resorted to installing expensive cameras and security systems in our homes when this was unnecessary just a couple of years ago. I've heard several fellow homeowners express their desire or intention to move away from the area due to the over proliferation of multi -family housing, including at least one family that has already sold their home and bought a new one away from the congestion and increased crime. The zoning board should not benefit one developer at the expense of hundreds of existing homeowners and residents of existing apartments. Brodie Creek and Woodland's Edge are quiet, safe, beautiful communities that are a credit to the city and attract professionals from across the nation and across employment fields. As congestion and crime increase and property values decrease, this area will lose its appeal and the city will lose a valuable asset to attract good new talent to this area. I am no means opposed to multi -family housing. I lived in numerous apartments before purchasing my home. But enough is enough. This part of Little Rock is becoming Rental Row, and I've seen no evidence that the demand for rental housing in Little Rock has skyrocketed to a level that would justify such explosive expansion in this previously quiet corner of the city. I cannot attend the zoning meeting on the 19th because of business obligations, but I hope this email and others from my neighbors will convince the zoning board that enough is enough. This area is saturated. The space on Bowman is already appropriately zoned for single family homes and should remain so. Thanks for your time and consideration. Adrienne Baker Homeowner on Sweetgrass Drive Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: Learning Express Of Little Rock <le-358@att.net> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:06 PM To: James, Donna Subject: re: Project Z-8503-D I would like to voice my opposition to yet another proposed apartment complex in close proximity to our dwelling in Woodlands Edge. This will negatively impact the already congested Kanis and Bowman Roads and will devalue our property. I want to go on record as opposing Project Z-8503-D. Ed Figarsky Learning Express of Little Rock (501) 228-0440 http://littlerock.learningexpresstoys.com James, Donna From: Chris George <ctg5150@gmai1.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:34 PM To: James, Donna Cc: management@woodlandsedgepoa.com Subject: Opposed to re -zoning item Z-8503-D Ms. James, As a resident of Woodlands Edge I am voicing my opposition to re -zoning item Z-8503-D. For brevity, I'll just state my reasons. A) Many apartments, including many by this same developer, have already been built or are currently being built, in the same general area. The developer has already received approval to develop hundreds of units across the street from this proposed location. Those apartments are currently being developed. B) No matter how nice the apartment complex, having apartments built lowers the property values of homes in the general vicinity. Our city should proceed cautiously with multi -family housing development at the risk of further driving away existing homeowners to other areas of the state. C) The residents of Brodie Creek, Woodlands Edge, Point West, Sandpiper, Parkway Place, etc. have already had to deal with their fair share of apartment development from all angles in the past couple of years. At what point is it all enough? There are roughly twice as many apartment units currently in development as there are actually in use at this moment. If nothing else, development needs to be throttled back until there is a better picture of the effects, known and unknown, once the apartments already in development are populated. D) South Bowman Road and Bowman/Kanis traffic congestion will continue to get worse. Even with supposed road improvements, its questionable how much that congestion can truly be alleviated. I have no problem with the land in question being developed for its originally intended use - single family housing. However, please consider the negative affect that allowing more apartments to be built in an area already swamped with new apartment development will have on the existing neigborhoods. Some of these areas are among the lessening number of neighborhoods that are still desirable within the Little Rock area. Why do something to drive your long-term residents away at the cost of developing additional apartment/short-term living units? Sincerely, Chris George James, Donna From: Joy Figarsky <joy.figarsky@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:26 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Proposed Apartments Ms. James, I am writing you in regard to proposed apartments, Z-8503-D. I live in Woodlands Edge and am extremely concerned about these new proposed apartments. there has been a significant over saturation of new apartments recently bordering our development. The roads can not handle the increased traffic. Both Bowman and kanis are dangerous roads already. It is hard to believe you all are considering approving yet another apartment project right near us. We purchased in Woodlands Edge and West Little Rock due in large part because of the amount of green spaces. This new project is very close to our home and we are appalled that this would even receive consideration for approval. We would not have spent our hard earned money to live in Woodlands Edge if we knew this would turn into the sort of area you are allowing. Please consider not approving this newest project. Thank you for consideration of this, Joy Figarsky, 8 Warblers Cove, Little Rock, AR 72211 phone 501-410-3201 Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: Dawn -Marie E. Coggins <dawnmariee76@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:44 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Against proposed apartments next to Woodland's Edge/Brodie Creek (Project Z-8503- D) I am a concerned person who lives in Woodland's Edge with a young child. This proposal of new apartments is a hindrance. The traffic on Bowman is already at capacity and it is difficult to turn out of Brodie Creek Trail due to the other developments that have recently occurred. This proposal will just add to the congestion, in addition to the decrease of the green space around our beautiful community. Please use this as a voice against this project. Regards, Dawn -Marie Coggins Woodlands Edge resident James, Donna From: Jennifer Merritt <jennifermerritt2010@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:26 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Opposition to request for rezoning Z-8503-D This email is to voice strong opposition to the request for rezoning and development on Bowman Road between Brodie Creek and The Pointe apartments filed by the apartment developers (Z-8503-D). I have lived in Woodlands Edge for over three years and use the Brodie Creek exit onto Bowman daily. The existing traffic on Bowman has become almost impossible to navigate during peak hours since the addition of the Pointe apartments. It will get much worse when the huge apartment complex currently under construction across the street from the Pointe is completed. This area cannot withstand an additional 400 rental units and commercial properties as proposed by the developer. It is a matter of public safety. Please vote NO and keep this land zoned for single family residential use only. Thank you. Jennifer Merritt Sent from my iPhone. James, Donna From: Valerie Moran <vmoran@crye-leike.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:24 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Proposed Apartments on Bowman alongside Brodie Creek Okay, City of Little Rock. This is not okay with me. I am a REALTOR in this community and I live in Woodland's Edge. The traffic already has been increased greatly due to the exisiting apartments already open passed Brodie Creek. And, they are already clearing a HUGE amount of land closer in from those on the opposite side of Bowman. We also already have those built on Kanis at Kanis and Cooper Orbit. We do not want another huge apartment complex in this area. It is beginning to be unsafe to live and work in this area due to traffic concerns. How do you see that Little Rock needs any more apartment complexes in this area? Are we not saturated enough? PLEASE don't let this area of Little Rock go down hill by keeping allowing these developments to happen. Respectfully, Valerie Moran, ABR, CPPS Crye-Leike Realtors, Kanis Branch 11600 Kanis Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Mobile: 501-680-6410 Efax: 501-320-4487 x James, Donna From: Rebecca Butler <Rebecca.Butler@stephens.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:14 PM To: James, Donna Subject: apartments on Bowman Please, please do not let anymore apartments be constructed close to Woodlands Edge. It is a true statement that crime rates will increase due to this and also traffic flow in and out of the neighborhood will be ridiculous. It's hard enough to exit onto Kanis from the neighborhood, now the same thing is going to happen on Bowman. Very, very upset if this is allowed. This is one of the nice areas of Little Rock that is slowing being taken over by apartments. NO MORE!!! STOP WITH THE APARTMENT CONSTRUCTION ALREADY!!! MH! Rebecca Butler 2812 Mossy Creek Dr Little Rock, AR 72211 501-366-2438 Fallow Stephens on Twitter WARNING: All email sent to or from this address will be received or otherwise recorded by the Stephens Inc. email system and is subject to a{chival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. Stephens Inc. does not accept securities orders via email. If you need to place a securities Sransact}on, you must speak with a financial consultant. James, Donna From: michele murray <michelemurrayrn@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 3:01 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Apt proposal near Brodie creek My name is Michele Murray-Pyne, resident in the woodlands edge community. I strongly disagree with the proposal of new apartments next to Brodie Creek. Bowman and kanis are becoming severely congested during high traffic times. None of the apartment complexes nor city have come up with a plan in how to manage this and yet they are continuing to build - Please add me and my information to any lists of people opposing this proposal . Thank you. Michele Murray-Pyne 501-442-6016 Michelemurrayrn@yahoo.com Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone James, Donna From: Jane Evans <janeinre@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:48 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Opposition to Z8503-D Please vote against Z 8503 This will be the third development of apartments on Bowman Road within a few miles and it is far too many for the area. The apartments that he has already built affect the traffic, the noise and the value of our homes in this area. I did not oppose the first or second but I am strongly opposed to additional apartments. They will affect us. I sold residential Real estate for 15 years and lived In Little Rock for 30 years I have seen how things change neighborhoods. Please do not let this happen to our neighborhood. I would never have bought around this many apartments and quite frankly resent the fact that the developer tried to convince my neighbors and me that his high end apartments would bring value to our area. I am not against apartments or people who live in them. I am against it changing my neighborhood. Jane Evans 12115 Brodie Creek Trail Little. Rock, Ar Thi James, Donna From: greg jones <greg jones44@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:46 AM To: James, Donna Cc: <board@wood la ndsedgepoa.com>; Beverly Roachell Subject: Fwd: Planning meeting 11/19 T Herrick Heights Hello Donna. I wanted to once again reach out to you concerning the proposal submitted by Rich Smith Development on the agenda for today's meeting 11/19/15. I contacted you on October 8 2015 (my previous email is below) and I also attended the meeting to speak on behalf of the Woodlands Edge board of directors in favor of this proposal. With the recent revised proposal (now Herrick Heights) several of our residents who lived in a nearby radius were notified of this new application. Some, as expected, are opposed to the proposal and NOT in favor of WE board members supporting this proposal. Many other residents have showed great support. We sent an email to all residents of our community and I have received more comments in favor, based on our rational to support, than against. We conducted another community meeting last night 11/18 at the Woodlands Edge clubhouse. We also extended and invitation to the board members and residents of Brodie Creek subdivision. Approximately 1/2 of the attendees were Brodie Creek residents. None of their board members attended. Keith Richardson once again met with the group, reviewed the proposal, and answered questions. We acknowledge there are Woodland's Edge residents who DO NOT support this proposal. Not only are there concerns about multi family homes being built but another key concern is about the loss of green space. Maintaining the green space buffer is one key reason for our support. We know if this proposal does not pass and a different developer builds here (multi family, single family am development) there is no guarantee of green space between this property and Woodland's Edge. Often developers do not see value in leaving trees, or they see more value in removing them for more salable space. Many of our residents chose their home lot based solely on the green space alone. By supporting this proposal and negotiating this critical point with Mr. Richardson we may preserve this critical asset to our residents and community. After last nights meeting several who were originally opposed voiced a change of position and are now in favor, given the reason's explained by the board for supporting. We encouraged all Pro or Con to attend tonight's planning meeting and let their individual voice be heard. The board members of Woodlands Edge voted unanimously to support this proposal. 1 Here is a summary and recap of our reasons for support: 1. Protected green space will be left between the multi -family zoning area and the single family portions of the property plus Woodland's edge will be buffered from the apartments by the single-family portion of the property. 2. Restrict the number of units built per year rather than adding all buildings on the plan at once. 3. Mr. Richardson agreed to have a restriction put in the deed that insures the single family portion he showed us on his plot plan would be forever restricted to only single family use. 4. Mr. Richardson also agreed to have all the Bowman road improvements completed to full standard (half street improvements) on this property frontage before he gets the Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Access only through The Pointe at Brodie Creek with no connection into Woodlands Edge. With the language of this new proposal it appears assurances made by Mr. Richardson will be enforceable. We believe supporting this proposal is in the best long term interest of our community. The road improvements gained will benefit not only our residents but all who travel Bowman Road. Sincere Regards, Greg Jones President Woodlands Edge Community Association CC Woodlands' Edge Board Members. ►, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James, Donna <D.Tames(a,littlerock.or > Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:12 PM Subject: RE: Planning meeting 10/8 The Pointe At Brodie Creek To: greg Jones <greg.iones44@g-mail.com> Thanks — see you this afternoon From: greg jones [mailto:greg.jones44@pmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 1:09 PM To: James, Donna <DJarnes@little rock.org> Subject: Planning meeting 10/8 The Pointe At Brodie Creek Hello Donna. My name is Greg Jones. I am the new President of the Woodlands Edge Community Association. I along with several other board members will attend tonight's planning meeting. I wanted to introduce myself in advance. Ron Tyne let me know he had spoken with you earlier. I believe he may have briefly outlined the details of the meetings we have had with Keith Richardson in regards to his proposed plans to expand The Pointe At Brodie Creek Apartments. Mr. Richardson has met with members of our board on two occasions. During the last meeting Mr. Richardson made these commitments: Protected green space around the perimeter facing the proposed single family use portion of the property Restrict the number of units built per year rather than adding all buildings on the plan at once. C He agreed to have a restriction put in the deed that insures the single family portion he showed us on his plot plan would be forever restricted to only single family use. • Mr. Richardson also agreed to have all the Bowman road improvements completed to full standard (half street improvements) on this property frontage before he gets the CO on the first phase of the extended multi family portion. This is NOT a five year deferral While we the board members and our residents have concerns about additional traffic on Bowman Road many factors were a part of our decision to support this project. First among those are our sympathy for the current landowner. She desires to sell her property and should have that opportunity. With that, we also understand that if Mr. Richardson does not purchase and develop this property, other developers may not purchase or offer an equal amount due to the opposition. By keeping with the same builder, we will maintain greater visual continuity on Bowman road. This is something in which we see value. Our residents and neighbors gain higher level of green space, single family home assurances, which we believe impact our property value. We lower the immediate impact by building in phases rather than all 408 apartments at once, and mostly gain much needed and more expedient road improvements. These improvements will benefit our residents, those in surrounding neighborhoods, and other Little Rock residents who travel Bowman road. Finally, these road improvements coupled with those Mr. Richardson already has underway on Bowman road would allow the city to more easily and affordably add on to these improvements and correct other critical traffic issues on Bowman road. I look forward to seeing you later today. Sincere Regards, Greg Jones Date: December 3, 2015 From: Jane and Dave Jones 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Re: Rezoning Application Z-8503-D Keith Richardson Development Proposed Apartments on South Bowman Road To: All Little Rock Planning Commission Members: My wife and I are writing to voice our concern and definite objection to further apartment development in our area, and strongly encourage all Little Rock Planning Commission Members to deny this request. The residents of both Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge are VERY concerned with the over saturation of apartments in our area. We were not given any advance notice by our respective POA Boards that more apartments were being considered adjacent to our neighborhoods; otherwise, more residents would have attended the recent Planning Commission meeting to discuss this project. We are very concerned with the increased traffic, with safety, and with the effect that so many units will have on our property values, as well as the subsequent impact in selling our homes. When the first apartments were approved in 2010, we had very little notice from the developer, Keith Richardson, then as now. We only received notice a day or so before the Planning Commission meeting, leaving inadequate time to organize anything and respond. As for the second apartment complex across and east of Bowman, that is currently under construction, the developer had zero regard for saving trees on that property or working with the topography. As a result every tree was cut from over 100 acres of land, tops of hills were cut off and a large area of the site was filled to provide a flat site to build on. They maximized how many units they could rent and had absolutely no sensitivity to the environment or natural setting once there. We understand development will occur, but believe a more creative design should have been used to avoid such a harsh effect on the landscape and so that the design fit into a more natural setting. It's our understanding that the Brodie Creek and the Woodlands Edge Board has been communicating with Mr. Richardson for some time. They did not share any information with their residents; there was an annual Woodlands Edge Homeowners Association meeting on November 10 and absolutely nothing about this proposed development was mentioned. For one thing, the Woodlands Edge POA Board had more than enough time to communicate with the residents and chose not to. Secondly, when residents did find out it was the week of the Planning Commission meeting and misinformation and fear tactics were used manipulate. A meeting was called at the last minute with Mr. Richardson and Woodlands Edge residents; Brodie Creek residents were invited to attend. We were told the property was already zoned for apartments and the project was a done deal. We were also told apartments would get approved, no matter what and if we did not go along with Mr. Richardson's apartments that likely something much worse would eventually be approved. The traffic on Bowman is very dangerous and long. We can see Bowman Road from our front porch and cannot tell you how many times cars run off the road and into the ditch. We have even had cars end up in our neighborhood pond. Getting out of Brodie Creek in the morning can take 10 minutes or more to turn left onto Bowman or Kanis if exiting from Woodlands Edge. These projects will hurt our property value; there are already an enormous number of new apartment projects in the area, the two on Bowman and the one on Kanis. Building these new apartments will only make Mr. Richardson richer than he already is and it will negatively impact the hundreds of hard working residents and families of Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge. We appreciate your very serious consideration in this matter. My wife and I hope that you will agree to vote against rezoning of this property and not allow ANY further apartments to be built in our area. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us at 501-227-0239. Respectfully submitted, � Pvt Dave Jones J rones 12023 Brodie Creek Trail, Little Rock AR 72211 CC: Little Rock Mayor CC: Little Rock City Board of Directors James, Donna From: spencerwilson87@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:10 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Re: NO to Project Z-8503-D Hello Donna, Upon further review and after additional conversations I am now supportive of this proposal. Thank you! Spencer Wilson Sent from my iPhone On Nov 16, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Spencer Wilson <s encerwilson87 maiI.com> wrote: Hello Donna, I hope you are well today. I am contacting you to voice my concern and disapproval of the proposed Project Z-8503-D in west Little Rock near Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge. Here are some reasons why I am NOT in favor of this project. Traffic. The current road conditions of Bowman and Kanis are completely unacceptable and the approval of this project will only worsen it. The roads are narrow, windy, uneven, little to no shoulder, steep ditches, and are in overall poor shape. We cannot continue to overwhelm these streets with more and more commuters, and it's getting extremely hard and dangerous to make turns out of the residential neighborhoods. Green space / natural beauty. The recent construction projects on Bowman and Kanis are removing significant green space and natural Arkansas beauty, which is a real shame, and there is little to no appreciation for incorporating it into the housing / apartment designs. The planned neighborhoods of Woodlands Edge and Brodie Creek did a fantastic job of saving precious green space. The result is we now have excellent residential housing in a highly desirable and valuable area. We need to think LONG TERM. Decreased home value. I fear that these developments will decrease my home and neighborhood value for the reasons noted above. These projects may generate short term revenue but I strongly believe that there will be negative long term consequences. Please do NOT approve Project Z-8503-D. Thank you, Spencer Wilson 12603 Meadows Edge Lane, Little Rock, AR 72211 Spencer Wilson 501.786.0355 James, Donna From: dstew@sbcglobal.net Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 12:58 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Herrick Heights rezoning request (file Z-8503-D) Ms. James, I'm writing to urge you to recommend denial of any rezoning request that would allow apartments to be constructed on the property located on the west side of South Bowman Road between Brodie Creek subdivision and the Pointe at Brodie Creek apartments. I feel that with the existing apartments at the Pointe at Brodie Creek, the apartments under construction across Bowman near The Church at Rock Creek, the apartments being built further south on Bowman, and the apartments under construction near Kanis and Cooper Orbit, the addition of another apartment complex is not what the area needs. I have been a resident of the Brodie Creek subdivision since February 2012, and in the ensuing 3.5 years I've seen a drastic change in the landscape along Bowman and Kanis. These traditionally rural, wooded areas and nearby wetlands that are teeming with wildlife are completely cleared and leveled for the construction of these massive apartment complexes. I've seen large wildlife - deer and bobcat - in my front yard. I feel the best use for the land in question, if it must be developed, would be single-family housing in line with those currently found in neighboring Brodie Creek and %Noodlands Edge, which can responsibly preserve and incorporate as much of the existing woodlands and wetlands as possible. This would also serve to preserve existing home values, which go toward creating a strong sense of community that is hard to find in areas with an abundance of apartment complexes. All that said, if apartments will inevitably be built there anyway, I think that Mr. Richardson's proposal is as good as any the area's existing residents can expect to see. While I'm against the development of apartments anywhere on that property, I concede that creating a buffer of single-family development and green space between existing homes and his expansion of the Pointe at Brodie Creek, and having a developer who is already heavily invested in the area with existing high -end apartment development, is the best of a worst -case scenario, in my opinion. A final comment about traffic, which has increased noticeably since I've moved into the area, and will obviously continue to do so as construction is completed on existing projects. Something must be done about the intersection of Brodie Creek Trail and south Bowman, and now is better than later, since we know the increase is inevitable. Construction/modifications to a moderately busy road is less impactful than waiting until the road is completely clogged. The sight -lines in either direction when exiting Brodie Creek Trail are not good due to curves in the road, and a busier street makes taking riskier turns into traffic inevitable. This is becoming a safety issue for the residents and workers who use that intersection every day. A change needs to occur, whether it's a traffic signal, road widening, a roundabout, etc. There is nothing in Mr. Richardson's existing proposal that addresses this, and is ultimately a problem that falls onto the city's shoulders. Thank you for your time. Doug Steward 8 Deerberry Forest Circle Little Rock, 72211 James, Donna From: Melissa Smith <smithmelissa2010@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 11:54 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Petition AGAINST Project #Z-8503-D for 11/19/2015 meeting Dear City of Little Rock, We were recently made aware of project #Z-8503-D and wish to voice our strong disapproval. Apparently, the Brodie Creek POA board met with Keith Richardson several months ago and for whatever reasons decided to not share the news of Richardson's apartment projects to Brodie Creek residents. Therefore, Richardson's current projects were all approved and are underway on S. Bowman without Brodie Creek residents being informed by our POA. Had Brodie Creek residents been informed of Richardson's plans to rezone single unit housing land to multi- unit land on S. Bowman for his current projects, I am sure he would have been met with opposition by concerned Brodie Creek Residents. I fear our property values will greatly decrease due to Richardson's developments. Our homes are our greatest investments and the close proximity of massive apartment complexes will, in my opinion, result in a typical pattern seen in Little Rock. Once upscale apartment areas such as Mara Lynn are now run down and ridden with crime. My understanding is that the city declined Richardson's attempt to rezone the property adjacent to Brodie Creek from Single Family Units to Multi -Family Units at the October 8, 2015 board meeting. So, now Richardson is trying to push his agenda through by requesting PD-R zoning. We strongly oppose his request! We have already experienced the negative by products of Richardson's apartment developments in North Little Rock near Maumelle Blvd. We moved from that area due to the increased traffic in part created on Maumelle Blvd by Richardson's massive apartment developments. Now, we are in Brodie Creek and fear this same developer is going to ruin this area with excessive apartment developments. South Bowman to Kanis was not designed to handle the massive influx of traffic which more than 1300 apartments (total including what the city approved for The Pointe at Brodie Creek) will create. We will also have excess apartments which are being built on S. Bowman near Colonel Glenn. I also have serious safety concerns about the ability for emergency vehicles to enter and exit Brodie Creek. Brodie Creek has one entrance and exit onto S. Bowman. Richardson is improving road access to 36th street. However, no improvements are being made from Brodie Creek to Kanis. It is often difficult to drive out of our neighborhood as it is now. I cannot imagine the dangerous situation Brodie Creek residents will have with the additional cars from more than 1300 apartments in total. That number does not include the apartments being built near Colonel Glenn. Clearly, the property should remain zoned properly as Single Unit housing. The addition of homes would be good for area home values and wouldn't add nearly as much of a traffic burden on S. Bowman to Kanis Road. I have to question why POA board members of either Brodie Creek or Woodlands Edge would support Richardson unless it benefits them somehow or they were misled and/or made promises by Richardson? The city would not be able to enforce any such promises, if they were made, once zoning is approved. We hope the city will see what is happening and what has been allowed to happen to S. Bowman and vote against rezoning. Also, please take into consideration that Brodie Creek residents were not advised of these developments which conveniently has not given residents time to attend the meeting and petition against this rezoning. Sincerely, Keith and Melissa Smith 31 Deerberry Forest Circle Little Rock, AR 72211 James, Donna From: Melissa Smith <smithmelissa2010@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:07 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Please USE information to be shared with city re: Z-8503-D Dear City of Little Rock, The Woodlands Edge POA alerted Keith Richardson of ALL the upset residents in Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge who are against the rezoning of the property adjacent to Brodie Creek. Keep in mind, both the Woodlands Edge and Brodie Creek POA boards deliberately withheld ALL information regarding ANY of Richardson's developments because Richardson apparently made them promises and the boards did not want residents to learn of these developments because Richardson somehow convinced them that he was offering them a deal they could not refuse. So, both Woodlands Edge and Brodie Creek residents were advised late this afternoon that a meeting would be held at 6 p.m. at the Woodlands Edge Club House and that Richardson would be present to address all questions and concerns. Richardson told the group that if city does not approve the zoning that the land owner could file a lawsuit against the city for decreasing her property values!!!!! In other words, Richardson was warning the residents of a potential lawsuit with the implication that if the city does not accept HIS deal then the property owner could sell to anyone else and it could become much less than what he claims to be offering. Additionally, Richardson was trying to use the money he has already spent on improving 36th Street as bait or as something we, the residents, should be grateful for and thereby approve his deal. I don't understand why the POA's kept this information from residents. I also feel that Richardson's warnings of the land owner potentially suing the city was used to create fear among the residents and a sense of urgency for us to approve his deal. I would like the board to question Richardson on these tactics and to deny once again his attempt to over populate our area with FAR too many apartments. The landowner should sell to a home builder as single family homes are what would be best for our neighborhoods and the city. We fear S. Bowman will become the next Resevior Road. Richardson is saying the landowner could sue for the loss of property value. Who do the residents of Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge then possibly sue for the decrease in value of our homes? I hope the city will do the right thing and once again deny Richardson rezoning. He also promised that he would own and maintain his properties forever. We all know these are empty promises and nothing but the rhetoric of a salesman. Sincerely, Dr Keith W. Smith James, Donna From: Jennifer McClellan <jen.mcclellan@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:30 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Bowman Development Donna, I live in Brodie Creek along with my sister April Gibbs, at 27 Briar Patch Ct. We have been discussing the growth on Bowman Road with our neighbors and residents in Woodlands Edge, and have learned there is even more development planned and it's even closer to our neighborhood now. The amount of apartments already there or under construction is staggering, especially given our current traffic problems. I can't even imagine adding more apartments and single-family homes or condos along there. Why not encourage these developers to add these closer to Colonel Glenn Road? I would also point out there are apartments being constructed on Kanis Road, right along the back side of Woodland's Edge. We're being surrounded. We very much oppose this added development. We pay well over $3,000 in property taxes, and we both vote here in Little Rock. The property values will plunge over here, as well as the quality of life, if Green Mountain or Reservoir Roads, or even Chenal are any indication. Please oppose this development along with us and on our behalf. Thank you, Jennifer McClellan (501) 773-8186 James, Donna From: jwestshipley@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 2:23 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Herrick Heights As a resident of Woodlands Edge, I am writing to voice my disapproval of the proposed rezoning of Z-8503-D, Herrick Heights. The best possible outcome for our neighborhood and our neighbors in Brody Creek and Cherry Creek is for the land to remain zoned as it is currently: single family dwellings. It is extremely unfortunate that the POA boards of Woodlands Edge and Brody Creek chose not to inform the residents of the negotiations or of the decision until after the fact, and even then only when called out about it. There are three very large multi -family developments already in progress on Bowman and one on Kanis. The traffic situation on both roads is already bad, and those residents haven't even moved in yet. Piecemealing together entries and exits doesn't help. Have you driven down Bowman or that section of Kanis recently? Have you tried to turn left onto Bowman from Executive during peak traffic hours? Have you tried to turn left out of Brody Creek on either Bowman or Kanis in the mornings or between 5-6 pm? It's neither easy or safe. Just how many apartments are needed in the two mile radius of our neighborhood? When do we say enough is enough? When do we say we aren't interested in Bowman becoming another Reservoir Road or Green Mountain Drive or Counts Massie? Our neighborhood is where we raise our children. Our homes are our biggest investment. And these are not insignificant investments. It's unfortunate that this behind -closed -doors deal between the developer and our POAs has made us rethink our neighborhood and will most likely cause our investments to lose value. Sadly, I am unable to attend the planning commission meeting tomorrow as I only discovered yesterday that this item will be on the agenda. My son will be at ACH having testing; I would drop everything else to be there. Please do not pass this rezoning effort. Please say that enough is, in fact, enough. Sincerely, Jamie West Shipley 33 Woodstream Cove Woodlands Edge Little Rock, AR 72211 Sent from my iPhone Jamie West Shipley James, Donna From: jwestshipley@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:12 AM To: James, Donna Cc: David C Shipley Subject: Question regarding Z-8503-D, Herrick Heights Good morning, Last night, I attended a Woodland's Edge meeting about the proposed Herrick Heights development. During the meeting, there was a lot of discussion about future land use maps. According to the developer and our PDA board, these future land use maps, not current zoning, determine how a property can be developed. We were told that because the future land use maps indicate multiple family homes on the proposed development site that the city cannot turn down a request to develop that parcel of land in that matter. We were told, in fact, that if the city did turn down the request to develop the parcel that the current landowner could sue the city for the decreased value of her property. Essentially, we were told to roll over and accept that apartments were going to be built there and that the only thing we could do is negotiate for the best apartments we could get! So, what do these future land maps mean, and how do they impact current zoning? Is the developer correct in his interpretation of this issue? Additionally, what other areas near our neighborhood are deemed multi -family or commercial on these future land use maps? Certainly, we were never told that our "green development" was going to be smack dab in the middle of a giant commercial development. As a resident who lives in the neighborhood, who drives that narrow, two-laned road everyday, I'm concerned about the current traffic situation and the additional impact in traffic coming from the project already underway. We certainly don't need another development adding to said traffic. Sadly, I never knew I was buying a home in the middle of apartment row. Had I known, I certainly would not have spent as much money on my home as I did. Actually, I simply would have bought a home elsewhere. I'd appreciate any help you can provide in clarifying the "future land use" issue. Many thanks, Jamie West Shipley Sent from my iPhone Jamie West Shipley James, Donna From: Cristina King <c_keeton@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:30 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Woodlands Edge/Brodie Creek Hi, I just wanted to write to express my family's concern regarding the rezoning and potential plans to develop the area of green space that is right outside my back door! I live at the end of Brodie Creek Trail with my house backing up to this area. I feel so strongly that this area should not be further developed with more apts/homes. I'm concerned about safety and traffic along Bowman. Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge homes hold great property values that I think will only be negatively impacted if this were to happen. Thank you! Cristina King 12419 Brodie Creek Trl Little Rock, AR 72211 Sent from my Phone James, Donna From: Benjamin Utter <bdutter@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:23 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Brandy Utter Subject: Concerns regarding proposed development on Bowman Road Good Evening, Ms. James. My family and I moved from Minnesota this past summer into the Brodie Creek neighborhood, to which we were drawn for a variety of reasons, including the surrounding green space and relative quiet. We are enjoying our new home very much (and indulging in just a little schadenfreude as temps begin dropping for family and friends up north), but have observed with some concern the substantial developments taking place around us even in the few short months since our arrival. Now word is making its way around the residents of Brodie Creek that a local developer is being persistent in his efforts to replace the very agreeable forest acreage adjacent to our neighborhood with multi -family unit housing. This concerns us. Although we will be attending the upcoming meeting with minds and ears open to the arguments of both sides, we feel reasonably confident that the proposed rezoning and development plans do do not have the interests of our neighborhood foremost in mind. We are heartened to see from the Oct. 8 Planning Commission meeting minutes that you were not supportive of the rezoning request at that time, and hope that the developer's renewed efforts will not find you more sympathetic this time. Thank you for your vigilance and efforts on behalf of the city. Sincerely, Ben and Brandy Utter Benjamin D. Utter Doctoral Candidate University of Minnesota utter035 ,gm.ail.com bdutter@gmail.com "Hige sceal pe heardra, heorte be cenre, mod sceal pe mare pe Eire mxgen lytlao" James, Donna From: Brandon Jeffus <jeffus13@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:06 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-8503-D Ms James, My name is Brandon Jeffus and I am a property owner in the Woodlands Edge subdivision in Little Rock. I wanted to write to voice my opposition to the addition of more apartment complexes to the area surrounding our neighborhood, specifically the proposed apartments known as project Z-8503-1). I feel that the Bowman and Kanis area is already saturated with apartment communities besides the fact that the infrastructure just isn't there to support the onslaught of traffic from all the recently built, under construction, and proposed units. I strongly urge the planning commission to block the addition of more apartment communities in the area. Brandon Jeffus 4 Oxeye Lane Little Rock, AR 72211 434-242-3491 James, Donna From: Traci Jones <tdjones07O9@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:13 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Strongly oppose the Planned Zoning Development near Woodlands Edge Dear Mrs. James, I can't even put into words what having a development within 200 feet of my house will do to the serene livelihood that is Woodlands Edge. Numerous times I have looked out my back window and seen deer walking in Broadie Creek. We even have an owl that lives in the tree behind our house. The reason my family and I bought in this neighborhood was because of the green space and protected environment which is quite special. Please, please, please reject this proposal. The traffic on Bowman is already extremely dangerous. I can't imagine what it will be like if 3 more lots are built. Please keep this little piece of heaven alone and do not allow future building. Thank you for your time and consideration. Traci Jones Resident on Meadows Edge Lane James, Donna From: Janet Canalichio <jatta227@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:04 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-8503-D Donna, Good afternoon, my husband and I live on Meadows Edge Lane in Woodlands Edge. We are currently in Florida caring for my husband's elderly mother and will be unable to attend the meeting tomorrow evening. Please don't let our absence be misunderstood for complacency in this matter. We are completely opposed to the rezoning of the area in question. Nasty congestion on Bowman road and Kanis Road will only be increased. Noise from construction and dirt work will be unbearable. Really. There is also the consideration of draining wetlands, the area in question is very low and floods often when we have heavy rains. There are many species of wildlife that inhabit that area. We know of a bobcat family, foxes, raccoons, red tail Hawks, great blue Herons, and a great horned owl that all live there and would be endangered if this project goes through. Thank you for your help, Janet Canalichio Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad James, Donna From: Timothy Daters <tdaters@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 12:24 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Keith Richardson Subject: Brodie Pointe PRD Donna, the three new items we have agreed to include; 1 Contribute $100,000 towards the construction of a traffic signal or roundabout at the intersection of Brodie Creek Trail and Bowman Road. This would be available for a period of five years from approval of the PRD. 2 Provide a 50 foot wide buffer along the northern boundary of the PRD. No trees would be removed from the buffer, but additional plant materials may be added as part of an approved Landscape Plan. 3 That portion of the PRD marked "Proposed Residential' will be developed as single family residential, with lots widths and home sizes similar to those in either the Brodie Creek and Woodlands Edge developments. Tim Timothy E Daters, PE President White-Daters & Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 M: (501) 580-5694 E: tdaters@whitedaters.com Traffic Study Pointe at Brodie Creek Phase IV prepared fora White-Daters & Associates, Inc. Bowman Road Little Rock, Arkansas A ARKANSAS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ERNEST J. PETERS No. 4682 ,loI Project No.: P-1791 PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. October 7, 2015 • CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • 5507 Ranch Drive- Suite 205 (501) 868-3999 Updated: November 2, 2015 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Fax (501) 868-9710 PETERS & ASSOCIATES La ENGINEERS, INC. November 2, 2015 Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: P1791 Traffic Engineering Study Summary of Findings Pointe at Brodie Creek Phase IV Bowman Road Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Mr. Daters: Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. has conducted a traffic engineering study relating to the proposed Phase IV development of the Pointe at Brodie Creek. The development is proposed to consist of approximately 408 additional multi -family residential units to be located on the west side of Bowman Road, north of the current Pointe at Brodie Creek apartment development in the City Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. Access to the Pointe at Brodie Creek Phase IV will be via the existing site access drive that intersects Bowman Road. A reduced copy of the site plan is included in the Appendix for reference. The primary focus of this report is to assess traffic operational characteristics along Bowman Road in the vicinity of the site. Also included in this summary of findings is projection of traffic volumes associated with approximately 500 multi -family unit development of Bowman Pointe approved for construction on the east side of Bowman Road, just north of 36 h Street. As a part of the previously approved phases of Pointe at Brodie Creek and Bowman Pointe, there are extensive improvements planned on Bowman Road as shown on the following page. A larger copy of the Bowman Road improvement plan is included in the Appendix for reference. 5507 RANCH DRIVE - SM 209 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72223 (501) 86&3999 FAX(501) 868-9710 Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 2 � �onx•Invc ... . rMwrbr. i, I . -r �w srn•r k_ll I , PHASE IV POINTE AT ,1� Msnwv r BR.ODIE CREEK ` <tw sralvc r �rr�rs f•rnn BOWMAN ww ., i.lwt I•.. POIN'I F .1. rX�i P�..ryrM.l•' 1 C 1 -. EU (.w ;'F,YPIi4l Lu v>Rp+INb; POINTE'AT BRODIECREEK -- �r w•"~"•r.w� y � . • vri.e;"si +t r � t i ' i �.•Irr.v�nTr 40 �u s,nvr�mr cw ' .pus• w,...�a xv.ra •v•I. =ten Il �•`IG..µ ^ Figure 1 — Bowman Road Planned Improvements Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Hourly, 24-hour traffic counts were made by this Consultant on Bowman Road. Existing, hourly 24-hour traffic count data for these locations are depicted below. Figure 2 — Existing Weekday 24-Hour Traffic Volumes TRIP GENERATION AND SITE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS The Trip Generation, an Informational Report, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and The Trip Generation Manual by Trafficware, LLC (9th Edition), 2012, were utilized in calculating the magnitude of traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed land -uses to include the Pointe at Brodie Creek Phase IV development (approximately 408 additional units), plus previously approved (and under construction) approximately 500 multi -family unit development of Bowman Pointe. These are reliable sources for this information and are universally used in the traffic engineering profession. Using the selected trip generation rates, calculations were made as a part of this study to provide a reliable estimate of traffic volumes that can be expected to be associated with the additional phase of development as proposed. Applying the appropriate trip -generation rates to the land use proposed for the development makes these calculations. Results of these calculations are summarized on Table 1, "Summary of Trip -Generation." Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 4 Table 1 — Summary of Trip Generation The same developer is constructing all of these units. Not all units will be built at one time, but rather over approximately the next five years. The following Table 2 and Chart 2, "Projected 24-Hour Traffic Volumes Summary," depicts the projected weekday daily traffic volumes expected to occur on Bowman Road, just north of the site through 2020. These volumes include existing traffic volumes, expected increase of site -generated traffic each year, plus annual background traffic growth to account for development by others in the vicinity. YEAR 24-HOUR VOLUME BOWMAN POINT ADDITIONAL # UNITS BOWMAN RD. 24-HR VOL. NORTH OF SITE BRODIE CREEK ADDITIONAL#UNITS BOWMAN RD. 24-HR VOL. NORTH OF SITE Bowman Road 2-way 24-Four Traffic Volumes 15000 -- - ❑ 2015 Existing o ❑ 2016 `m ❑ 2017 H 10000 -- — a 02018 .2 1112019 > ■ 2020 J 5000 — - — — 2017 2018 Y—r Table 2 and Chart 2 — Projected 24-Hour Traffic Volumes Summary Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 5 Highway Capacity Software (2011) Directional Two -Lane Roadway Segment Analysis was done for Bowman Road just north -of the proposed development. Volume to capacity ratio (v/c) for a two-lane roadway segment has been analyzed as a part of this study. This was done for 2015 existing volumes, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 projected future volumes on Bowman Road. The following Chart 3, "Bowman Road 2-Lane Highway Capacity Calculation (v/c) Summary," depicts the projected LOS and We expected to occur on Bowman Road, just north of the site through 2020. Detailed calculations are included with this traffic engineering study. Bowman Road 2-Lane Hignway Capacity Calculation 0.65 — - - --. vlc = 0.59 vlc = 0-57 LOS = E ' vlc = 0.55 LOS = E v!c » 0.54 LOS = E g 0.55 D 2015 Existing fr p 201 ii u vlc = 0.48 132017 m LOS = D [32018 0 vlc = 0.45 ■ 2019 LOS = D 0.45 - ■ 2020 E 0 0.35 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Existing Year Chart 3 — Bowman Road 2-Lane Highway Capacity Calculation (v/c) Summary Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 6 The projected full build -out traffic volumes are depicted graphically on Figure 4, "Projected 2020 Weekday Traffic Volumes." Figure 4 — Projected 2020 Weekday 24-Hour Traffic Volumes Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 7 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants analysis was made for existing traffic volumes as well as projected 2020 traffic volumes for the following intersections: o Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail o Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive. As stated in MUTCD Section 4C.01, Studies Factors for Justifying Traffic Control Signals, the study should consider the effects of the right -turn vehicles from the minor -street approaches. Engineering judgment should be used to determine what, if any, portion of the right -turn traffic is subtracted from the minor -street traffic count when evaluating the count against the signal warrants._As a part of the traffic signal warrants analysis for the intersection of Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail included in this study, 50 percent of the eastbound right -turns have been factored out for analysis of existing and projected 2020 traffic conditions. As a part of the traffic signal warrants analysis for the intersection of Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive included in this study, eastbound and westbound right -turns have not been factored out for analysis of existing traffic conditions or projected 2020 traffic conditions. It was found that traffic signal warrants are not currently met for the intersection of Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail and for the intersection of Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive with existing traffic volumes. Traffic signal warrants analysis for each of these intersections indicates volumes are currently not sufficient to satisfy any warrants. The traffic signal warrants analysis results for this intersection are summarized in Table 4, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results - Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail - Existing Traffic Conditions," and Table 5, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results - Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive - Existing Traffic Conditions." FINAL RESULTS: Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis Hour warrant was met: Major St.: Bomwan Road Minor St.: Brodie Creek Trail VOLUME COMB. 4 Hr. Peak Existing Conditions W1 500 750 400 600 50% RTs Factored Out 150 75 120 60 SUM MAX. HOUR MAJOR MINOR 1A 1B 1AB 2 3 7:00 784 207 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8:00 604 123 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 9:00 512 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 600 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 731 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 857 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 741 62 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 14:00 751 71 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 15:00 731 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 865 71 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 17:00 1026 71 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 18:00 566 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 359 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 295 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:D0 174 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 This intersection DOES NOT SATISFY the warrants for signalization as outlined in the "M.U.T.C.O." Table 4 — Traffic Signal Warrants Results — Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail - Existing Traffic Conditions Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 8 FINAL RESULTS: Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis Major Sl : Bomwan Road Hour warrant was met: Minor SL: Cherryside/Shady Creek VOLUME Existing Traffic Cond. COMB 4 Hr With All Right -Turns 0 7 660 sum 150 75 120 0 0 HOUR MAJOR MIMAX. NDR 1A 1B 1AB 7:00 822 71 0 0 2 8:00 633 30 0 0 0 0 1 0 9:00 536 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 62g 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 786 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 898 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 77g 25 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 14:00 787 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 766 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 907 22 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 17:00 1076 34 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 593 24 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 376 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 309 9 0 ❑ 0 0 0 21:00 182 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 p 0 0 0 0 n This intersection DOES NOT SATISFY the warrants for signal as outlined in the ,AA i1,T.C,D." Table 5 — Traffic Signal Warrants Results — Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive - Existing Traffic Conditions It was found that traffic signal warrants are projected to be met for the intersection of Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail for projected 2020 traffic conditions. Traffic signal warrants analysis for this intersection indicates projected volumes are expected to be sufficient to satisfy Warrant; (peals hour warrant). The traffic signal warrants analysis results for this intersection are summarized in Table 6, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results - Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail - Projected 2020 Traffic Conditions." FINAL RESULTS: Magar St: Bomwan Road Ninor St: Brodie Creek Trail Proj. 2020 Cond. With 50% RT's Factored Out SUM MAX HOUR MAJOR MINOF 7:00 1123 207 8:00 895 123 9:00 701 53 10:00 755 45 11:00 944 52 12:00 1075 57 13:00 951 62 14:00 963 71 15:00 950 47 16:00 1149 71 17:00 1358 71 18:00 823 68 19:00 559 41 20:00 458 15 _21:00 285 iic atgnal warrants Analysis Hour warrant was met: VOLUME COMB, 4 Hr Peal 500 750 400 600 150 75 120 60 1A 1B 1AB 2 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 p ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 1 2 2 1 1 This Intersection SATISFIES the warrants for signalization as outlned in the "M,U.T.C.D." Table 6 — Traffic Signal Warrants Results -- Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail — Projected 2020 Traffic Conditions Mr. Timothy E. Daters P. E. November 2, 2015 Page 9 It was found that traffic signal warrants are projected to continue to not be met for the intersection of Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive for projected 2020 traffic conditions. Traffic signal warrants analysis for this intersection indicates volumes are projected to not be sufficient to satisfy any warrants. The traffic signal warrants analysis results for this intersection are summarized in Table 7, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results - Bowman Road and Chenyside Drive / Shady Creek Drive -- Projected 2020 Traffic Conditions." FINAL RESULTS: Traffic Signal Varrants Analysis 4810f St: Bomwan Road Hour warrant was met: Mnor St.: Cherryside/Shady Creek VOLUME 7aJ. 2020 Cond. With COMB. q Hr 01 Right -Turns 0 7 660 SUM MAX 150 75 120 0 0 HOUR MAJOR MINOR 1A 18 1AB 7:00 1163 71 0 0 2 8:00 925 30 0 0 0 0 1 Q 9:00 727 27 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 786 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 981 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 1119 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 9B9 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 1002 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 988 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 1194 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 1410 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 852 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 577 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 473 9 0 0 0 0 0 27 00 294 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q R 0 0 0 0 0 0 This Intersection DOES NOT SATISFY the warrants for signalization as outltnad in 11ie "M.U.T.C.O." Table 7 —Traffic Signal Warrants Results -- Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive — Projected 2020 Traffic Conditions This report addresses the City -requested roadway level of service analysis for two-lane section of Bowman Road (existing and projected conditions) as well as traffic signal warrants analysis (existing and Projected conditions) for the intersections of Bowman Road and Brodie Creek Trail and Bowman Road and Cherryside Drive / Shady Creek Drive. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, PETERS & ASSOCIATES, ENGINEERS, INC. Ernest J. Peters, P.E. President Directional Page] of 2 f Information DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET EJP S ite lnformation or Company CLR hway / Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2015 rformed 11/2/2015 m/To Time Period sdiction )ascription: lysis Year 2015 Data Shoulder width _ tl Lane width 1t —� Lane "idth _ It Shoulder width It Segment length, tt mi analysis direction vol, Vd 677veh/h Opposing direction vol., Vu 452veh/h Shoulder width ft 4.0 Lane Width ft 110 Segment Lenglh mi 1.5 Overage Travel Sneers r-assenger-car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) Heavy-vehlcle adjustment factor, fH 1 Ts=l/ (1+ PT(ET-1)+pR (ER-1) ) trade adjustment factorl, fO ATS (Exhibit 15-9) )errand flow rate2, vi (pc/h) v,=VI / (PHF' [ . f g,ATS HV,ATS) Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement in speed of sample3, SFM it demand flow rate, both directions, v -POW speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS ) for no -passing zones, fnp,ATs (Exhibit 15-15) 2.1 mi/h Evyhi -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) rar equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) cle adjustment factor, fHV=1/ (1+ PT(ET 1)+pR(ER-1) ) stment factorl, fg PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) flow rate2. vi(pc/h) v� Vil(PHF'fHv,PTSF ) *PTSFnt time-spent-followingo, BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavdb-------------- j.for no -passing zone, f-p PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSF +f d np,PTSF �(Vd,PTSF / Vd,PTSF + o,PTSF) Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) Volume to capacity ratio, v/c r Class I highway r Class II highway F Class III highway `•, Terrain r Level l' Rolling Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 No -passing zone 1000/u 5110iv 0001 % Trucks and Buses , PT 2 % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Access points mj 8/mi r Direction 1.5 1.1 0 989 0.98 759 g Direction 1.8 11 0,983 0.95 526 Base free -flow speedoEstimated Free -Flow Speed , BFFS 45.0 mi/h Adj. for lane and shoulder width,o fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1.7 mi/h Ady for access pointso, fA (Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS-fA) 41.3 mi/h Average travel speed, ATSd=FFS-0.00776(v + v d,ATS o,ATS) - 29.2 ml/h np,ATS s Direction (a) 1.0 1.0 1.00~ 0.9~ 74� 64.9 30.5 82.8 Ig Direction 1�� 1.0 0.992 0.95 52� file://C:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6A8.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 (Apacily. Cd ATS (Equation 15-12) pc/h 1688 Capacity, Cd,PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h Percent Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 1700 Bicycle Level of Service 70.7 Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, VOL (Eq. 15-24) veh/h Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 735.9 effective speed factor, Sr (Eq. 15-30) 15.00 3icycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq. 15-31) 4.42 3icycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) 4.35 ( riepe D 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vl(vd or v.) ]=1,700 pcJh, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 vehfh. 4. For the analysis direction only 5. Exhiblt 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6. Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl spends on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010TM Version 6 1 Generated: 11/2/2015 12:19 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6A8.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst EJP .Agency or Company CLR Date Performed 111212015 ,Analysis Time Period Highway / Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2016 From/To Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2016 Project Description: Input Data -- — — — — — — — ———Shuuldern- ----- tt r Class I highway r Class II highway F Class III highway Terrain r Level r Rolling Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 No -passing zone 100% ShowrlaTihFTraat % Trucks and Buses, PT 2 % % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Access points mi 8/mi �— Lane width — It Lane widtIT it Shoulder width ft — — — — — — — — — — — — — = _ _ _ — Segment length, mi Analysis direction vol., Vd 731veh/h Opposing direction vol., Vo 487veh/h Shoulder width ft 40 Lane Width ft 11.0 Segment Length mi 1.5 ,Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.4 1.8 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.1 1.1 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV,ATS=1/ (1+ Pr(Er-1)+PR (ER-1)) 0.991 0 983 Grade adjustment factor, fg ATS (Exhibit 15-9) 0.99 0.96 Demand flow rate2, yr (pc/h) vi=Vi / (PHF* fg ATS * fHV,ATS) 810 561 Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow Speed Mean speed of sample3, SFM Total demand flow rate, both directions, v Free -flow speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS) Adj. for no -passing zones, fnp,ATS (Exhibit 15-15) 2,0 mi/h Base free -flow speedo, BFFS 45.0 mi/h Adj. for lane and shoulder width,o fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1.7 mi/h Adj. for access pointso, fA (Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLs fA) 413 mi/h .Average travel speed, ATSd=FFS-0.00776(vd,ATS + Vo,ATs) 28.7 mi/h tnp,ATS .Percent Time -Spent -Following Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.2 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV=1/ (1+ PT(ET 1)+PR(ER 1)) 1.000 0.996 Grade adjustment factor, fg PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 0.96 Directional flow rate2, vi(pc/h) vi=Vi/(PHF*fHV,PTSF* fg,PTSF) 795 554 Base percent time-spent-followingo, BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavdb) 66.2 Adj. for no -passing zone, fnp,PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) 26.5 Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF *(Vd,PTSF / Vd,PTSF + VO.PTSF) 83.0 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures (Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) D 'Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.48 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k698.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity, Cd,ATS (Equation 15-12) pc/h 1688 Capacity, Cd,PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h 1700 Percent Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 69.5 Bicycle Level of Service Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, VOL (Eq. 15-24) veh/h 7946 Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 15.00 Effective speed factor, S, (Eq. 15-30) 4.42 Bicycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq. 15-31) 1 4.39 Bicycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) D Notes 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vi(vd or vo) >=1,700 pc/h, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4. For the analysis direction only 5. Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6. Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010TM Version 6.1 Generated: 11/2/2015 12:19 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k698.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information -Site Information Analyst EJP (Highway I Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2017 ,Agency or Company CLR From/To Date Performed 1112115 Jurisdiction .Analysis Time Period Analysis Year 2017 Project Description: Input Data _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __Shoulderwidth tt r Class I highway r Class II highway r Class III highway Terrain I— Level `` Rolling Lane Width tt Lane width It Shoulderwidth It Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Segment length, mi 9 9t No -passing zone 100% .Analysis direction vol., Vd 636veh/h Show IlnnhAmwi % Trucks and Buses, PT 2 % Opposing direction vol.. Vo 558veh/h % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Access points mi 8/mi Shoulder width ft 4.0 Lane Width ft 110 Segment Length mi 1.5 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.7 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.1 1.1 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV,ATS=1/ (1+ PT(ET-1)+PR (ER -1)) 0.993 0.985 Grade adjustment factors, fg ATS (Exhibit 15-9) 1-00 0.97 Demand flow rate2. v, (pc/h) vi=Vi I (PHF" fg ATS * fHV,ATS) 915 635 Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow Speed Base free -flow speedo, BFFS 45.0 mi/h Mean speed of sample3, SFM ,Adj. for lane and shoulder width,o fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1.7 mi/h Total demand flow rate, both directions, v ,Adj. for access pointso, fA (Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS) Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS fA) 41.3 mi/h Adj. for no -passing zones, fnp,ATS (Exhibit 15-15) 1.7 mi/h ,Average travel speed, ATSd FFS-0.00776(vd,ATS + Vo,ATS) 27.6 mi/h fnp,ATS Percent Time -Spent -Following Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 JHeavy-vehicle adjustment factor, flV 1/ 0+ PT(ET 1)+PR(ER-1)) 1.000 1.000 Grade adjustment factorl, fg PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 0.97 Directional flow rate2' vi(pc/h) vi=Vi/(PHF'fHV.PTSF* fg.PTSF) 909 625 (Base percent time-spent-followingo. BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavdb) 70.8 ,Adj. for no -passing zone, fnp,PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) 25.1 (Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF k(Vd,PTSF / Vd,PTSF + 85.7 Vo,PTSF) ,Level of Service and Other Performance Measures (Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) D 'Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.54 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6Bl.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity, Cd,ATS (Equation 15-12) pc/h 1688 Capacity, Cd.PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h 1700 'Percent Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 66.8 .Bicycle Level of Service Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, v0L (Eq. 15-24) veh/h 908.7 Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 15.00 Effective speed factor, St (Eq. 15-30) 4.42 Bicycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq. 15-31) 4.46 Bicycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) D Notes 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1-00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vi(vd or vo) >=1,700 pc/h, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4. For the analysis direction only 5. Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6. Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 2010TM Version 6.1 Generated: 11/2/2015 12:21 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6B1.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Site Information Analyst EJP Highway / Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2018 Agency or Company CLR From/To Date Performed 11/2/2015 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period Analysis Year 2018 Project Description: Input Data -- — f --——— — —— — — —Shoulder width --tt r Class I highway F Class II highway r Class III highway Terrain r Level F Rolling Lane width it Lane vridth it --——————————Shoulderwidth tt-—------------- Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 ED Segment length, li mi No -passing zone 1001/0 Shore No0h Arrove % Trucks and Buses, PT 2 % Analysis direction vol., Vd 851veh/h % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Opposing direction vol , Vo 567veh/h Access points mi 8/mi Shoulder width ft 40 Lane Width ft 11.0 Segment Length mi 15 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.7 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.1 1A (Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV,ATS=1/ 0+ Pr(Er-1)+PR (ER-1)) 0.993 0,985 Grade adjustment factor, fg ATS (Exhibit 15-9) 1.00 0.97 (Demand flow ratez, vl (pc/h) vi=Vl / (PHF' fg ATS � fHV,ATS) 932 645 Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow Speed Base free -flow speedo, BFFS 45.0 mi/h (Mean speed of sample3, SFM .Adj. for lane and shoulder width,o fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1,7 mi/h 'Total demand flow rate, both directions, v Adj. for access pointso, fA (Exhibit 15-8) 2,0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS) Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS fA) 41.3 mi/h Adj. for no -passing zones, fnp,ATS (Exhibit 15-15) 1.7 mi/h ,Average travel speed, ATSd FFS-0.00776(vd,ATS + Vo,ATS) 27.4 mi/h fnp,ATS Percent Time -Spent -Following Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV� 1/ (1+ PT(ET 1)+PR(ER-1)) 1 000 1.000 Grade adjustment factor, fg,PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 0.97 Directional flow ratez, vi(pc/h) vi=Vi/(PHF`fHV,PTSF* fg,PTSF) 925 635 b 'Base percent time-spent-followingo, BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavd) 72 2 ,Adj. for no -passing zone, fnp,PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) 24.6 Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF *(Vd,PTSF / VdPTSF + 86.8 Vo.PTSF) Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) E 'Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.55 ffle:HC:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k436.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity, Cd ATS (Equation 15-12) pc/h 1688 Capacity, Cd,PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h 1700 Percent Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 66.3 Bicycle Level of Service (Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, VOL (Eq. 15-24) veh/h 925.0 (Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 15.00 Effective speed factor, Si (Eq. 15-30) 4.42 (Bicycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq. 15-31) 4.47 Bicycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) D .Notes 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vi(vd or vo) >=1,700 pc/h, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4. For the analysis direction only 5 Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 1.6. Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 201OTM Version 6.1 Generated: 11/21201b Wlb FIM file://CADocuments and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k436.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Site Information .Analyst EJP (Highway / Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2019 .Agency or Company CLR From/To Date Performed 101812015 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period Analysis Year 2019 Project Description: Input Data _ _ _ _ _. _ — _ _ — _ _—si,oul— -Width — — n r Class I highway r Class II highway r Class III highway Terrain r Level F Rolling �— Lane width It Lane width It Shoulder width 11 --— — — — — ————------------- Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 E9 Smern len h, n,i e g gt No -passing zone 1000/0 Slum 1100 Arrow % Trucks and Buses , PT 2 % Analysis direction vol., Vd 883veh/h Opposing direction vol., V. 589veh/h % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Access points mi 8/mi Shoulder width ft 4.0 Lane Width ft 11.0 Segment Length mi 1.5 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) (Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.7 (Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.1 1.1 (Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV,ATS=1/ (1+ PT(ET-1)+PR (ER-1)) 0.993 a985 Grade adjustment factorl, fo ATS (Exhibit 15-9) 1.00 0.97 Demand flow rate2, yr (pc/h) vi=Vi / (PHF" fg ATS * fHV,ATS) 967 670 Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow Speed Base free -flow speedo, BFFS 45.0 mi/h Mean speed of sample3, SFM Adj. for lane and shoulder width,4 fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1.7 mi/h 'Total demand flow rate, both directions, v Adj. for access points4, fA (Exhibit 15-6) 2.0 mi/h (Free -flow speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS) Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS fA) 41.3 mi/h Adj, for no -passing zones, fnp,ATS (Exhibit 15-15) 1.6 mi/h .Average travel speed, ATSd=FFS-0.00775(Vd,ATS + VO,ATS) 27.0 mi/h fnp,ATS ,Percent Time -Spent -Following Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, flV 1/ 0+ PT(ET 1)+PR(ER-1)) 1.000 1.000 Grade adjustment factor, fg PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 0.98 Directional flow rate2, vl(pc/h) vi=Vi/(PHF*fHV,PTSF* fg,PTSF) 960 653 Base percent time-spent-following4, BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavdb) 73.3 ,Adj. for no -passing zone, fnp,PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) 23.8 Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF *(Vd,PTSF / Vd,PTSF + 87.5 Vo, PTS F) Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) E 'Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.57 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6C4.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity, Cd TS (Equation 15-12) pc1h 1688 Capacity, Cd,PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h 1700 (Percent Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 65.4 Bicycle Level of Service (Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, VOL (Eq. 15-24) veh/h 959.8 (Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 15.00 Effective speed factor, St (Eq. 15-30) 4.42 iBicycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq. 15-31) 4.49 Bicycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) 0 .Notes 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade :segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vi(vd or vo) >=1,700 pc/h, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4. For the analysis direction only 5. Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6. Use alternative Exhibit 15-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 20107rM Version 6.1 Generated: 11/2/2015 12:24 PM fileWCADocuments and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6C4.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 1 of 2 DIRECTIONAL TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information site Information Analyst EJP Agency or Company CLR Date Performed 111212015 Analysis Time Period (Highway / Direction of Travel Bowman Rd 2020 From/To Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2020 Project Description: Input Data ____...--__---__ Shoulder tiv- _--_—I; r Class I highway F Class II highway F Class III highway Terrain Level Rolling Grade Length mi Up/down Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 No -passing zone 1000/0 Show M)rth Arrow % Trucks and Buses, PT 2 % % Recreational vehicles, PR 1% Access points mi 8/mi Lane width 1t —� Lar,evridth 1t Shoulderwidth tt — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---= _ � — — Segment len h, mi 9 9t Analysis direction vol., Vd 916veh/h Opposing direction vol., Vo 610veh/h Shoulder width ft 4.0 Lane Width ft 11.0 Segment Length mi 15 Average Travel Speed Analysis Direction (d) I Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-12) 1.3 1.6 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-11 or 15-13) 1.1 1.1 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV,ATS-1/ (1+ PT(ET-1)+PR (ER-1)) 0.993 0.967 Grade adjustment factors, fg ATS (Exhibit 15-9) 1.00 0.96 Demand flow ratez, vi (pc/h) vi=Vi / (PHF* fg ATS * fHV,ATS) 1003 685 Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow Speed ]Mean speed of sample3, SFM 'Total demand flow rate, both directions, v 'Free -flow speed, FFS=SFM+0.00776(v/ fHV,ATS) Adj. for no -passing zones, fnp,ATS (Exhibit 15-15) 1.5 mi/h (Base free -flow speedo, BFFS 45.0 mi/h Adj. for lane and shoulder width,o fLS(Exhibit 15-7) 1.7 mi/h Adj. for access pointso, fA (Exhibit 15-8) 2.0 mi/h Free -flow speed, FFS (FSS=BFFS-fLS fA) 41.3 mi/h Average travel speed, ATSd=FFS-0.00776(vd,ATs + Vo,ATS) 26.7 mi/h fnp,ATS Percent Time -Spent -Following Analysis Direction (d) Opposing Direction (o) Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, ET(Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 15-18 or 15-19) 1.0 1.0 Heavy -vehicle adjustment factor, fHV=1/ (1+ PT(ET 1)+PR(ER-1)) 1.000 1.000 Grade adjustment factorl, fg PTSF (Exhibit 15-16 or Ex 15-17) 1.00 0.98 Directional flow rate2, vi(pc/h) vl=V /(PHF*fHV,PTSF* fg,PTSF) 996 677 Base percent time-spent-followingo. BPTSFd(%)=100(1-eavdb) 75.4 Adj. for no -passing zone, fnp,PTSF (Exhibit 15-21) 22.7 Percent time -spent -following, PTSFd(%)=BPTSFd+f np,PTSF *(vd,PTSF / Vd,PTSF + Vo,PTSF) 88.9 Level of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 15-3) E 'Volume to capacity ratio, v/c 0.59 file:HC:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6CD.tmp 11/2/2015 Directional Page 2 of 2 Capacity, Ca ATS (Equation 15-12) pc/h 1688 Capacity, Cd,PTSF (Equation 15-13) pc/h 1700 Pefmnt Free -Flow Speed PFFSd(Equation 15-11 - Class III only) 645 Bicycle Level of Service (Directional demand flow rate in outside lane, VOL (Eq. 15-24) veh/h 995.7 (Effective width, Wv (Eq. 15-29) ft 1500 Effective speed factor, St (Eq. 15-30) 442 (Bicycle level of service score, BLOS (Eq 15-31) 4.50 (Bicycle level of service (Exhibit 15-4) E .Notes 1. Note that the adjustment factor for level terrain is 1.00,as level terrain is one of the base conditions. For the purpose of grade adjustment, specific downgrade :segments are treated as level terrain. 2. If vi(vd or vo) >=1,700 pc/h, terminate analysis --the LOS is F. 3. For the analysis direction only and for v>200 veh/h. 4. For the analysis direction only 5. Exhibit 15-20 provides coefficients a and b for Equation 15-10. 6. Use alternative Exhibit 1.5-14 if some trucks operate at crawl speeds on a specific downgrade. Copyright © 2010 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS 201OTM Version 6.1 Generated: 11/2/2015 12:29 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\E. J. Peters.PETERS\Local Settings\Temp\s2k6CD.tmp 11/2/2015 PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. • CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEEMG • 5507 Ranch Drive - Suite 205 (501) 868-3999 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Fax (501) 868-9710 ./ uu��. u�✓ilVl�.L1.7 anti -bias law in Fayetteville Ruling: No new shielded class i)AN HOLTMF.YER AND RON WOOD ,WA DEMOCRAT Gr]ZS M FAYETTEVILLE -- A Washington County judge ruled Tuesday that Fayette- ville's civil rights ordinance does not violate state law, Circuit Judge Doug Martin granted the city's motion for summary judgment against the ballot question committee Protect Fayetteville and the: Arkansas attorney general's office. He determined that the city's Unified Civil Rights Protection ordinance is valid, legal and enforceable. The ordinance protects people from being evicted, fired, turned away or other- wise discriminated against because of their sexual ori- entation or gender identity, with an exemption for reli- gious organizations. Those characteristics aren't covered by the state's civil rights law. The ruling was the first judicial test of last year's Act 137, which prohibits local governments from protect- ing classes of people an "a basis not contained in state law." Attorney General Les- lie Rutledge and supporters of the act said it would stop ordinances like Fayetteville % including similar laws in Eu- reka Springs and elsewhere in the state. The ruling likely will b appealed, Fayetteville City Attorney Kit Williams said- , -I am gratified that w were able to cross the firs legal hurdle in our defens of. the citizen enacted Uni form Civil Rights Protectio ordinance. Because of th importance of this civil right issue, an appeal to the Ar sas Supreme Court by the kansas Attorney General the plaintiffs is very 'likely, Williams said in a statemen "1 will continue to strive to d my best to support our Fa etteville citizens•' enactme of the Uniform Civil Right Irotection ordinance . all challenges." Protect Fayetteville o posed the gOjRance and su again Rutledge will review the ruling and decide whether to appeal, said Judd Deere, coin- murucations director for the attorney general's Office. "The attorney general re- spectfully disagrees with the 1 judge's decision today," Deere said. In Martin's ruling, the judge agreed with Williams that state laws against bul- lying and affecting domes'is violence shelters .provide the "basis" needed to clear Act 137's test by saying people with different sexual -orien- tations or gender identities shottid be treated the same. In earlier court filings, Rutledge said the "basis" in the act should be understood to mean the state Civil Rights Act, .which covers race, reli- gion, national Origin, gender and disability. "Clearly, the classi#acartons of gender identity and sea�ual orientation were classifica- tions of persons protected on basis contained in state law prior to the enactment of Or- dinance 57f31," Martin wrote. As such, Ordinance 5781 does not create a protected classi- to all fication on a basis not con- tained in state law and, there- off fore, the ordinance does not sent violate the plain meaning of n. the language used in the first ng prong of Act 137" ame e The ordinance's oppo- nents and the attorney gen- eral's office argued before who e Martin in January that Act boo t 137 makes Fayetteville's or- e dinance meaningless; while jai - Williams argued the state law n must.allow Fayetteville's pro- to e tections or, if it doesn't, the a 4 s law should be declared un- H kan- constitutional. because of U.S. Ar- Supreme Court precedent. wo or Assistant Attorney Gen- Cre era] Colin Jorgensen argued the t. Act 137 is constitutional and Str o constitutionally prohibits ha y- laws such as Fayetteville's. de it The act's stated purpose was s to keep discrimination laws ci uniform across the state so vot businesses could follow,them p- easier, he told Nl=-,n. ed Besides the state law is- - Her Little Rock firefighters spray foam on a load of recyclable materials that caught fire inside a Waste Management truck on South University Avenue near Interstate 30. The fire was difficult to extinguish inside the truck so the load was dumped onto the street to spread it out and find the smoldering Items. returns toplanners A ent rez�nlrlg CHELSEA BOOZER Richardson asked for the will go back before the board Here m tdehvelnprrient. Al2KANk Heig SAS DEMOCRAT -GAZETTE vote to be pushed back for two for a vote. y An application for rezoning weeks to Tuesday to allow time More than 75 people turned would lower their property val- ow another apartment de- for him to meet with the op- out in opposition to Richard- ues, increase traffic congestion pment in west Little Rock position. son's request Tuesday, all wear- and diminish the green space of Bowman Road will be At that meeting, he offered • ing red to show unity. that attracted them to their back .to the city's Plan- comprorrvses including a deed A spokesman for the group neighborhood. Commission after three restriction that would stay with said they would prefer the Single-family dwellings ndments were proposed the property and ensure cer- undeveloped site to retrain generate more average vehicle esday. tain lot sizes on the single -fain- zoned for a single-family sub- trips per day, according to a As a concession to a large ily section as well as a promise division. city memo sent to the board. osition group of residents to build a traffic circle on Bow- Richardson is planning The memo said single-family live single-f � tteigh- man Road to help with traffic, to build Herrick Heights in homes generate about 10 ve- hoods near the proposed contingent upon city approval. four phases, having 120 units hicle ttris un is generate six arer day, w ereas tment complex, developer He also agreed to 50-foo( buf- ready by 2017 and then addingapartment th Richardson volunteered fers between multifamily and 96 units each year for three to seven trips. alter his application. single-family areas- years. He also plans for office Since the 7Ft-acre site Rich- ter He's seeking approval of After many questions from space, single-fanA, homes and ardson is planning to develop 08-unit complex called board members to city staff a nursing home or recovery is already' zoned forsirigle-fani< Heights on a 74-acre members and the applicant house on the 74-acre tract. ily use, he could theoretically oded site south of Brodie Tuesday, City Director at -large There are already 504 put 296 to 470 homes on the ek Trail and northwest of Dean Kumpuris made amotion apartment units in the area property. With the idea that Bowman Road and 37th to send Richardson's applica- at the Pointe at Brodie Creek, the average household size is eet intersection. tion with his amendments back another Soo arc approved for 2.49 people, that would add )ozens of nearby residents to the Planning Commission Bowman Pointe, and a planned 737 to 921 residents. - ve vocally fought his planned for review development of 250 units has i'he population count for veloprnent, lobbying the After the commission been approved farther south the 408-unii apart entaboutc- tc's Board of Directors to makes decisions on those on Bowman. oppose plex is people, the memo said. e it down. amendments, the application Neighbors who P P for say they feel like we are Cazort withdrew his ordi- tral Arkansas Water, and Bill entitled to a raise. Every four nance Tuesday night, and he and Hillary Clinton Nation,' AT rarssti7d-n+ata.: ...•,r:+laiaar-t.ti+nr.hr: had-ixacPri_ir Q imrticrlAd�rcc-3.�ci_ —