The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZ-7500-F Application 1NAME PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW CENTRAL ARKANSAS WATER 15 May 2017 TYPE ISSUE THE HAMILTON APARTMENTS Z-7500-F ;ONG-FORM PD-R COMMENTS All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. The plan indicates considerable drainage, parking lot, and driveway improvements over two existing large diameter CAW water mains. These water mains must be protected and not damaged during construction of improvements. CAW requests cross sections along the centerline of the two water mains indicating elevations, grades, and improvement sections, subject to review and modification by CAW before any approval of this improvement is made. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. K NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS LOT 2 CHENAL COMMERCIAL Z-4470-1 All Central Arkansas Water requirements in PARK SHORT -FORM PCD effect at the time of request for water service must be met. The plan indicates considerable drainage, parking lot, and driveway improvements over two existing large diameter CAW water mains. These water mains must be protected and not damaged during construction of improvements. CAW requests cross sections along the centerline of the two water mains indicating elevations, grades, and improvement sections, subject to review and modification by CAW before any approval of this improvement is made. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS THE PARKS LONG -FORM PD-R Z-9220 completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. Please submit plans for water facilities to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities. Approval of plans by Central Arkansas Water, the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Additional fire hydrant(s) will be required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. 4 NAME TYPEISSUE COMMENTS WISTERIA ADDITION S-1794 All Central Arkansas Water requirements in PRELIMINARY PLAT effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. Please submit plans for water facilities to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities. Approval of plans by Central Arkansas Water, the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Additional fire hydrant(s) will be required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). 5 NAME TYPEISSUE COMMENTS LOTS 96-9E NORTHWEST Z-5099-G TERRITORY SHORT -FORM PCD All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly 1.1 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS LBPC SHORT -FORM PID Z-1412-C All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. STEPHENS ADDITION REPLAT - S-1626-A All Central Arkansas Water requirements in LOTS 2R-A, 2R-B, AND 2R-C effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. 7 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS ST. MARGARET'S EPISCOPAL Z-5773-B All Central Arkansas Water requirements in CHURCH LONG -FORM PDR effect at the time of request for water service must be met. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. HYDE PARK REPLAT S-1793 All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. Please submit plans for water facilities to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities. Approval of plans by Central Arkansas Water, the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Additional fire hydrant(s) will be required. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department to obtain information regarding the required placement of the hydrant(s) and contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of the hydrant(s). 17 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS NORRIS FURNITURE SHORT - FORM REVISED PCD All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated 10 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. 11 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS ISLAMIC CENTER OF LITTLE Z-7812-B All Central Arkansas Water requirements in ROCK WET SHORT -FORM PD-R effect at the time of request for water service must be met. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually 12 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS MICKLES SHORT -FORM PD-C Z-9219 thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. 13 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS 724 WOODROW STREET Z-928 All Central Arkansas Water requirements in SHORT -FORM PCD effect at the time of request for water service must be met. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. 14 NAME MARKHAM CENTER SQUARE SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN REVIEW TYPEISSUE S-1312-A COMMENTS All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required 15 James, Donna From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 3:40 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Revised PW Comment -PC Agenda 6-8-17 Donna, Please add this comments to the following: Wisteria Addition - In accordance with Section 31-176, floodway areas must be shown as floodway easements or be dedicated to the public. In addition, a 25 foot wide drainage and access easement is required adjacent to the floodway boundary. Vince Floriani, P.E. Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering 701 W. Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-371-4817 Public Works Review Comments Planning Commission Board of Adjustment Agenda Date: 6-8-17 Z File Number S-1312-A Markham Center Square Subdivision Site Plan 9101 W. Markham St. 1 W. Markham St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of- way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 3 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 4 A special Grading Permit for Flood Hazard Areas will be required per Sec. 8-283 prior to construction. 5 Provide the proposed top of finished floor elevation on the site plan. 6 The minimum Finish Floor elevation of at least 1 ft above the base flood elevation is required to be shown on plat and grading plans. An elevation certificate is required to be provided prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. 7 On site striping and signage plans should be forwarded to Public Works, Traffic Engineering for approval with the site development package. Z File Number S-1626-A Stephens Addition Replat Lots 2R-A, 2R-B, 2R-C 7 - 11 Pine View Place 1 The existing vehicular access from 13620 Pleasant Forest Dr. connecting with Pine View Place should be disconnected prior to plat approval. 2 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to plat approval. Z File Number S-1794 Wisteria Addition Preliminary Plat David O Dodd Rd south of Koen Lane 1 David O Dodd Rd is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of- way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to David O Dodd Rd including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be located at least 24 ft from the centerline. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 1 of 10 3 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is a variance being requested to advance grade future phases with construction of Phase 1? 4 Is an alternate pedestrian circulation system being proposed? 5 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 (e). 6 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. The detention facility shows to be off the subject property. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or property owners association. Is the proposed detention pond located within the floodway? 7 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 8 Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Public Works must approve completed plans prior to construction. 9 Street lights are required by Section 31-403 of the LR code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Street lights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engr 379-1813 (Greg Simmons) for more info. 10 Provide a letter prepared by a registered engineer certifying the intersection sight distance at the intersection(s) comply with 2004 AASHTO Green Book standards. 11 All public drainage easements must be unobstructed and access provided to the public right-of-way by constructed infrastructure and/or documented on the final plat. 12 All public drainage easements must contain drainage infrastructure approved by the City of Little Rock Public Works Department. 13 100 year overflow swales must be constructed and placed within public drainage easements. 14 With the limited street improvements proposed and no street improvements proposed in the near future, the intersection of Wisteria Lane a David O Dodd Rd creates unsafe driving conditions due to the existing 90 degree curve in David O Dodd Rd. Vehicular accidents occur commonly at this location. Vehicles stopping for left turns, increase in traffic volumes and limited sight distance in the 15 MPH curve will increase the hazard. Access should be taken from adjacent right-of-way with an emergency access taken to David O Dodd Rd. Z File Number Z-1412-C LBPC PID 1637 E. 15th St. 1 Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plan specifies that Security Street for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. 2 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of E. 15th St. and Security Ave. 3 Obtain a franchise agreement from Public Works (Bennie Nicolo, 371-4818) for the private improvements such as fencing and proposed located in the right-of-way. 4 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Security Drive with planned development. The new back of curb should be constructed 18 ft from centerline. The property is within a sidewalk exclusion zone. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 2 of 10 5 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. Z File Number Z-1793 Hyde Park Replat Madison St. b/w Charles Bussey & W 22nd St 1 Madison St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of- way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 2 W. 22nd St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of- way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 3 W. 21 st St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way to a total width of 50 feet will be required. 4 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Charles Bussey and Madison St. 5 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of W. 22nd St. and Madison St. 6 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of W. 21st St. and Madison St. 7 The proposed public alleys should be private utility and access easements and maintained by the developer or property owner association. CLR vehicles cannot provide services within the alley due to the no thru access is provided. 8 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Charles Bussey Ave. including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be placed 13 ft from centerline. 9 Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required to be provided adjacent to Madison St. and 22nd St. in accordance with Sec. 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. 10 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct full street improvement to W. 21st St. including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The street width should be at least 26 ft. I 1 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 12 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is an advanced grading permit being requested to advance grade future phases with Phase 1? 13 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 (e). 14 Per Sec. 29-102 an evaluation should be conducted on the basis of existing downstream development and any analysis of stormwater runoff with and without the proposed development. If the proposed development will cause or increase downstream flooding conditions, provisions to minimize such flooding conditions should be included in the design of the storm management improvements. Such provisions may include downstream improvements and/or detention of stormwater runoff and its regulated discharge to the downstream storm drainage system. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 3 of 10 15 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer, land owner, and/or property owner association. 16 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 17 Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Public Works must approve completed plans prior to construction. 18 Street lights are required by Section 31-403 of the LR code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Street lights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engr 379-1813 (Greg Simmons) for more info. 19 Since Madison St. is 24 ft in width, show on the plat that parking will be restricted on the east side of Madison St. 20 Damage to public and private property due to hauling operations or operation of construction related equipment from a nearby construction site shall be repaired by the responsible party prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 21 Obtain a franchise agreement from Public Works (Bennie Nicolo, 371-4818) for the private improvements such as the Madison St. retaining wall located in the right-of-way. 22 All public drainage easements must contain drainage infrastructure approved by the City of Little Rock Public Works Department. 23 All public drainage easements must be unobstructed and access provided to the public right-of-way by constructed infrastructure and/or documented on the final plat. Z File Number Z-4470-I Lot 2 Chenal Commercial Park PCD 100 block Wellington Hills Road 1 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 2 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is a variance being requested to advanced grading future phases with construction of Phase 1? 3 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 (e). 4 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or land owner. 5 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 6 Hauling of fill material on or off site over municipal streets and roads requires approval prior to a grading permit being issued. Contact Public Works Traffic Engineering at 621 S. Broadway, (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. 7 All driveways shall be constructed with concrete aprons per City Ordinance. The driveway apron radius cannot extend beyond the projection of the side property line to the street. The driveway radius cannot be greater than 15 ft. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 4 of 10 Driveway locations and widths do not meet the traffic access and circulation requirements of Sections 30-43 and 31-210. The proposed driveway is less than 50 ft from the existing Walgreens driveway to the south. Driveway spacing on an arterial street is 300 ft from other driveways and intersections and 150 ft from side property lines. Due to the limited street frontage and the CAW raw water line, the proposed driveway should be moved to the north and centered on the subject property between the 2 existing driveways. The width of driveway must not exceed 36 feet. 9 Any land alteration or encroachments within water line easement must be approved by Central Arkansas Water. 10 Damage to public and private property due to hauling operations or operation of construction related equipment from a nearby construction site shall be repaired by the responsible party prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Z File Number Z-5099-G Lots 913-9E Northwest Territory PCD B/W Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Rd 1 Chenal Parkway is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of- way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 Cantrell Rd is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial. Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required. Is a variance being requested? 3 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Chenal Parkway including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be located at least 29.5 ft from centerline. Are street improvements proposed to be phased? 4 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Cantrell Road including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be located at least 29.5 ft from centerline or as required by AHTD. Ordinance 19,883 was approved by the BOD which deferred construction of street improvements to Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Rd for lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,7,8, and 9A until lot 9 develops. The specific deferral is for constructing approximately 4850 linear ft of widening for one and one half lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage, street lights and intersection improvements on both sides of Chenal Parkway and the north side of Cantell Rd for the length of the frontage. 5 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 6 Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 7 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. A variance is being requested to advance grade future phases with construction of Phase 1. 8 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or property owner association. 9 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 10 Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Public Works must approve completed plans prior to construction. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 5 of 10 on plan.l 1 Z File Number Z-5773-B St. Margaret's Episcopal Church PD-R 20900 Chenal Parkway 1 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 2 With the issuance of a building permit, sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required to be installed adjacent to Chenal Parkway in accordance with Sec. 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. Z File Number Z-6698-D Norris Furniture Rev PCD 3900 John Barrow Rd 1 John Barrow Rd is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of- way 45 feet from centerline will be required. Z File Number Z-7500-Fa Hamilton Apartment PD-R 14810 Cantrell Road 1 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 2 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is the project proposed to be constructed in 1 phase? 3 The fill placed within floodway should be removed and vegetation established, prior to the item being heard by the Little Rock Planning Commission. 4 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 (e). 5 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer, property owners assocation, and/or land owner. 6 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 7 A special Grading Permit for Flood Hazard Areas will be required per Sec. 8-283 prior to construction. 8 The minimum Finish Floor elevation of at least 1 ft or more above the base flood elevation is required to be shown on plat and grading plans. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 6 of 10 9 In accordance with Section 31-176, floodway areas must be shown as floodway easements or be dedicated to the public. In addition, a 25 foot wide drainage and access easement is required adjacent to the floodway boundary. 10 With portions of the proposed development within the floodway, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) must be approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) must be approved to revise the floodway prior to issuance of the building permit even if the LOMR is being prepared by another party. 11 Due to the proposed traffic volumes, the existing driveway creates left turn conflicts with Jerry Drive. The existing driveway should be relocated to align with Jerry Drive to alleviate the unsafe driving condition. 12 Will the west driveway serve as an emergency access only or will provide a 2nd full access for all apartment occupants. Show on plan the emergency access connection planned for the Village at Isom Creek Subdivision located to the west. 13 If proposed for a 2nd access by apartments occupants, obtain approval for use of shared access easement located at the Taylor Loop Rd/Hwy 10 Intersection. 14 Per Chapter 36, no parking is allowed within the floodway. 15 The owner and/or manager of each multi -family residence of 100 or more dwelling units shall provide recycling and encourage participation by the tenants, renters, or owners of each unit. Contact Melinda Glasgow at 371-4646 for more information. 16 Show proposed location of gates, call box(s), and turnaround for a SU-30 vehicle. 17 Submit a Traffic Impact Study for the proposed project due to the amount of vehicular traffic on Hwy 10 and the amount of left turn movements. Study should address trip generation and trip distribution for the development and also should take into account existing and projected traffic growth. 18 Cantrell Rd is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial. Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required. 19 The access to the property should be provided by a shared access easements. The access easements should be constructed to minor commercial street standards (31 ft wide) with sidewalks. On the east the shared access easement, street width should be 36 ft from existing building to Cantrell Road. The west access at the Taylor Loop Road intersection is proposed to be taken thru an existing parking lot not constructed to a private commerical street standard with noncompliant driveway spacing, back -out parking, no pedestrian access, and not constructed to a standard street section. 20 Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 21 Alteration of the water course will require approval from the Little Rock District of the US Army Corps of Engineers prior to start of work. 22 A right turn lane should be constructed on Cantrell Road for the east driveway and the taper extend to the adjacent property's driveway if access other than emergency only access to the apartments is planned. A taper should be provided with a 100 ft taper and 50 ft stack. 23 The proposed access easement cannot be used to back vehicles. All parking spaces adjacent to the access easement must be removed. The easements should be constructed to commercial street standard with sidewalks. 24 A minimum undisturbed strip 25 ft wide except for reasonable access shall be provided along each side of streams having a 10 yr storm > 150 cfs. The undisturbed strip should be measured from the top of the bank. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 7 of 10 Z File Number Z-7812-B Islamic Center of Little Rock West PD-R 14900 Kanis Rd 1 Kanis Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be located 29.5 ft from centerline. An EB left turn lane should be striped. Additional paving beyond the side property lines maybe needed for lane tapers and 3 All driveways shall be concrete aprons per City Ordinance. 4 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is a variance being requested to advance grade future phases with construction of Phase 1? 5 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 (e). 6 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or land owner. 7 Show driveway locations on the west side of Kanis Road. 8 Provide a letter prepared by a registered engineer certifying the intersection sight distance at the intersection(s) comply with 2004 AASHTO Green Book standards. 9 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 10 Street Improvement plans shall include signage and striping. Public Works must approve completed plans prior to construction. 11 Street lights are required by Section 31-403 of the LR code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Street lights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engr 379-1813 (Greg Simmons) for more info. 12 Hauling of fill material on or off site over municipal streets and roads requires approval prior to a grading permit being issued. Contact Public Works Traffic Engineering at 621 S. Broadway, (501) 379-1805 (Travis Herbner) for more information. 13 Submit a Traffic Study which contains a Traffic Control Plan for the proposed project. Study should address trip generation and trip distribution for the development and also should take into account existing and projected traffic growth. The plan should consider the proposed # of students, grades, # of faculty, school times, and existing school traffic on Kanis Road. 14 Damage to public and private property due to hauling operations or operation of construction related equipment from a nearby construction site shall be repaired by the responsible party prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Z File Number Z-9219 Mickles PD-C 2904 S. Arch St. 1 Arch St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial with spcial design standards. Dedication of right-of-way to 35 feet from centerline will be required. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 8 of 10 2 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 3 Backing into the public right-of-way (Arch St.) creates safety hazards and is not permitted. 4 Show the proposed parking configuration. At least 40 ft wide parking area is required for 90 degree parking. 5 Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from AHTD, District VI. 6 The existing driveway is too narrow for 2 way traffic. Z File Number Z-9220 The Parks PD-R Southside of Mann Rd Additional 1 Mann Rd is classified on the Master Street Plan as a collector street. A dedication of right-of-way 30 feet from centerline will be required. 2 With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to Mann Rd including 5-foot sidewalks with planned development. The new back of curb should be located 18 ft from centerline. Additional widening to 24 ft from centerline, tapers, and striping should be provided for lane shifts and WB left turn lanes. paving maybe required to comply with AASHTO guidelines. 3 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Is an advance grading variance requested to advance grade future phases of the subdivision with the issuance of grading permit for the previous phase? 4 Provide a Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan per Sec. 29-186 due to the large drainage areas at the rear of lots. 5 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or property owners association as detailed in the bill of assurance. 6 If disturbed area is 1 or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 7 Street lights are required by Section 31-403 of the LR code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Street lights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engr 379-1813 (Greg Simmons) for more info. 8 Provide a letter prepared by a registered engineer certifying the intersection sight distance at the intersection(s) comply with 2004 AASHTO Green Book standards. 9 All public drainage easements must be unobstructed and access provided to the public right-of-way by constructed infrastructure and/or documented on the final plat. 10 All public drainage easements must contain drainage infrastructure approved by the City of Little Rock Public Works Department. 11 Access to detention ponds must be provided to the public right-of-way and/or access easement for future maintenance by the developer and/or local property owners' association. 12 Provide explanation for proposed improvements on northside of Mann Road. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 9 of 10 Z File Number Z-928 724 Woodrow Street PCD 724 S. Woodrow St. 1 Woodrow St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 Due to the proposed use of the property, the Master Street Plan specifies that Lamar Street for the frontage of this property must meet commercial street standards. Dedicate right-of-way to 30 feet from centerline. 3 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Woodrow St. and Lamar St. 4 The proposed Lamar St. driveway should be moved west to the public alley with access provided to the alley if desired in the future. 5 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged and remove driveway aprons not proposed to be used in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 6 A grading permit in accordance with section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Other than residential subdivisions, site grading and drainage plans must be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. Monday, May 15, 2017 Page 10 of 10 To: Dana Carney, Zoning & Subdivision Manager Date: 5-15-17 Donna James, Zoning Monte Moore, Subdivision From: Curtis Richey / Mark Alderfer: Building Codes Building Code Comments: Z-7500-F 14810 Cantrell Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@littlerock.gov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.gov . Z-4470-1 100 Block of Wellington Hills Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichevOlittierock goy or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.gov . Z-9220 Mann Road Just south NC 5-1794 David O Dodd Road south of Koen Lane NC Z-5099-G South side of The Divide Parkway Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; cricheyPlittlerock.gov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.goy . Z-1412-C 1637 East 15th Street NC S-1626-A 7-11 Pine View Place NC Z-5773-B 20900 Chenal Parkway Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichev@rittlerock.gov littlerock.eov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@little_rock.govov . 5-1793 Madison S. between Charles Bussey and West 22nd NC Z-6698-D 3900 John Barrow Road Project is a change in occupancy and is therefore subject to current building code requirements. Review and approval is required by Building Codes Division before occupancy takes place. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: NOTE: Contact FM Capt. Chris Sanders to coordinate an on -site review. 501-918-3782 Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crich V@fittlerock.org or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderferff littlerock.or . Z-78152-B 14900 Kanis Road Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey0ittlerock. ov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer littlerock. ov . 7-9219 2904 South Arch Street Project is a change in occupancy and is therefore subject to current building code requirements. Review and approval is required by Building Codes Division before occupancy takes place. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: NOTE: Contact FM Capt. Chris Sanders to coordinate an on -site review. 501-918-3782 Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; criche iittierack.or or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littlerock.org. Z-928 724 South Woodrow Street Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichey@11ttlerock. ov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; m a Id erferO little rock. ov . 5-1312-A 9101 West Markham Street Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; cricheyPlIttlerock.gov or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; maiderfer@littlerock.gov . Regards, Curtis Richey Commercial Plans Examiner MEMORANDUM TO: DONNA JAMES, SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FROM: TRACY SPILLMAN, PLANS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE BUFFER AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MAY 17, 2017, SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING CC: DANA CARNEY, ZONING & SUBDIVISION MANAGER DATE: MAY 12, 2017 1. 7-11 Pine View Place (S-1626-A) No Comment 2. Madison St between Charles Busse and W 22nd (S-1793 No Comment 3. David O Dodd Road south of Koen Lane ,S-17941 No Comment 4. 9101 West Markham S-1312-A Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). The minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet for developments with one hundred fifty (150) or fewer parking spaces. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1 /2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. Any exiting landscape or irrigation disturbed by construction shall be repaired or replaced before completion and final acceptance of the project. Note on plan any existing trees or groups of trees that are to remain. Trees selected for preservation shall have the area within the dripline fenced with protective fencing and protected from development activities. Graphically indicate the area to be protected on the plan and provide detail of the protective fencing. The dumpster enclosure adjacent to the Markham right-of-way shall be constructed of brick or block. In addition trees screening plant material shall be provided between the right-of-way and the dumpster enclosure. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 5. 1637 East 15'h Street (2-1412-C Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new development will need to adhere to the current landscape code. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). The minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet for developments with one hundred fifty (150) or fewer parking spaces. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1/2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 6. 100 Block of Wellington Hills Road Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Street buffers will be required at six (6) percent of the average depth of the lot. The minimum dimension shall be one-half (%) the full width requirement but in no case less than nine (9) feet. The maximum dimension required shall be fifty (50) feet. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. Perimeter planting strips are partially deficient on the south and west sides of the property. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). For developments with more than one hundred fifty (150) parking spaces the minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be three hundred (300) square feet. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1/2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. Landscape areas shall be provided between the vehicular use area used for public parking and the general vicinity of the building, excluding truck loading or service areas not open to public parking. These shall be provided at the rate equivalent to planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. One (1) tree and four (4) shrubs shall be planted in the building landscape areas for each forty (40) linear feet of vehicular use area abutting the building. Landscape areas will need to be added for the commercial building. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. The development of two (2) acres or more requires the landscape plan to be stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 7. South Side of the Divide Parkwa Z-5099-G Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements and the Highway 10 Scenic Corridor Overlay District. The Highway 10 frontage (front yard) shall consist of a minimum of forty (40) feet of landscaped area exclusive of right-of-way. The landscaped area shall contain organic and/or combined man-made/organic features such as berms, brick walls and dense plantings such that vehicular use areas are screened when viewed from an elevation of forty-two (42) inches above the elevation of the adjacent street. Trees shall be planted or be existing at least every twenty (20) feet and have a minimum of two (2) inches in diameter when measured twelve (12) inches from the ground at time of planting. Provide screening shrubs no less than thirty (30) inches in height at installation with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. Building landscape areas shall be provided at the rate equivalent to planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. One (1) tree and four (4) shrubs shall be planted in the building landscape areas for each forty (40) linear feet of vehicular use area abutting the building. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). The minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet for developments with one hundred fifty (150) or fewer parking spaces. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1/2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. A landscape irrigation system shall be required as per Highway 10 site design and development standards. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 8. 20900 Chenal Parkwa Z-5773-B Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance and the Chenal Overlay District requirements. Any new site development will need to adhere to the current landscape code. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 9. 3900 John Barrow Road Z-6698-D Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new site development will need to adhere to the current landscape code. If building rehabilitation exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the replacement cost then the landscaping and buffer must also come into compliancy accordingly. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 10. 148 10 Cantrell Road Z-7500-F Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. A land use buffer six (6) percent of the average width / depth of the lot will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar use of a more restrictive nature. The minimum dimension shall be nine (9) feet. The maximum dimension required shall be fifty (50) feet. As a component of all land use buffer requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the buffer. A minimum of seventy (70) percent of the land use buffer shall be undisturbed. Easements cannot count toward fulfilling this requirement. The plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape ordinance of the city, section 15-81. The properties to the north, east and west are zoned R-2. The average width of the lot is approximately eight hundred and thirty (830) feet. A fifty (50) foot buffer will be required in this area. The average depth of the lot is approximately five hundred and seventy-five (575) feet. A minimum thirty-five (35) foot will be required. The west buffer and a portion of the north buffer is deficient. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. Landscape areas shall be provided between the vehicular use area used for public parking and the general vicinity of the building, excluding truck loading or service areas not open to public parking. These areas shall be equal to an equivalent planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). For developments with more than one hundred fifty (150) parking spaces the minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be three hundred (300) square feet. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1 /2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. The development of two (2) acres or more requires the landscape plan to be stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 11. 14900 Kanis Road Z-7812-B Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. Street buffers will be required at six (6) percent of the average depth of the lot. The minimum dimension shall be one-half (1/2) the full width requirement but in no case less than nine (9) feet. The maximum dimension required shall be fifty (50) feet. The average depth of the lot is approximately four hundred and ten (410) feet in depth. A minimum twenty-five (25) foot buffer is required. Street buffer is deficient. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. A portion of the perimeter planting strip adjacent to Kanis Road is less than nine (9) feet. A land use buffer six (6) percent of the average width / depth of the lot will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar use of a more restrictive nature. The properties to the north, south, and east are zoned R-2. As a component of all land use buffer requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the buffer. A minimum of seventy (70) percent of the land use buffer shall be undisturbed. Easements cannot count toward fulfilling this requirement. The plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape ordinance of the city, section 15-81. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). For developments with more than one hundred fifty (150) parking spaces the minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be three hundred (300) square feet. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1/2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. Building landscape areas shall be provided at the rate equivalent to planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. One (1) tree and four (4) shrubs shall be planted in the building landscape areas for each forty (40) linear feet of vehicular use area abutting the building. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. The development of two (2) acres or more requires the landscape plan to be stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 12. 724 South Woodrow Street (Z-9218) Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) hall be planted for everY thirty feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines s located in the City's d igrsated30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. The property mature area. A twenty-five (25%) percent reduction of the perimeter width requirements is acceptable. eet Screening requirements will need to be met for thlinear pacing of not less atar use areas adjacent to three right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. The City Beautiful Comtniss. n recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscapes Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 13.2904 South Arch Street Z-9219 Site plan must comply with, the City, s minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. Any new site development will need to adhere to the current landscape code. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. 14. Mann Road Z-9224 No Comment v-mmwEnteergy May 11, 2017 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development ATTN: Ms. Donna James, AICP 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Entergy Arkansas Inc. #9 Entergy Court Little Rock. AR 72211 RE: Entergy comments related to Planning and Zoning items for the June 8th Meeting Ms. James, Please find below Entergy's comments related to the items received from the Department of Planning and Development last week. The request letter said to have the comments back to you by May 15th, 2017. • The Hamilton Apartments — behind 14810 Cantrell Road: Z-7500-F Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities based on the information provided. Power lines exist to the east along Pinnacle Valley Road and to the south serving existing customers in the area. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. • Lot 2 Chenal Commercial Park —100 Blk of Wellington Hills Rd: Z-4470-I Entergy requires more information on the location of this proposal. The print provided gave the block number and a lot number, but no other landmarks to be able to match the location with Entergy's facilities mapping system. There is the potential that an Entergy Transmission line borders the property. More specific information relevant to the Transmission line and its easement may be required. • The Parks - Planned residential development — Mann Rd: Z-9220 Entergy Distribution does not object to this proposal. A three phase power line exists along the southern edge of Mann Road on the north side of this property. Single phase, Distribution power lines are also in the vicinity serving established residential areas to the east and south. However, the development also involves an existing Entergy Transmission power line and easement as depicted on the drawing. There are three proposed road crossings and multiple pedestrian walking trails traversing Transmission easements. Please contact Entergy Transmission well in advance to discuss the future use of its easements and contact Entergy Distribution in advance to discuss future service requirements, new Distribution facilities locations and adjustments to existing Distribution facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. ■ Wisteria Addition Preliminary Plat —David 0 Dodd south of Koen Ln: 5-1794 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities based on the information provided. Power lines exist to the east along the west side of David O. Dodd Road and to the north along Koen Lane serving existing customers in the area. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. • Lots 9B-9E Northwest Territory — South side of The Divide Pkwy: Z-5099-G Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities based on the information provided. A three phase power line exists to the south along the north side of Cantrell Road. Caution should be used when constructing a drive underneath the existing power line to ensure that all proper clearances are maintained. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. ■ LBPC — 1637 East 15rh 5t: Z-1412-C ervice is already being provided to this property from Entergy does not object to this proposal. S the east side with no apparent conflicts with existing facilities. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. ■ Stephens Addition Replat — Lots 2R-A, 2R-B, 2R-C — 7 toll Pine View Place: S-1626-A Entergy does not object to this proposal. There is an existing underground power line running between lots 2R-B and 2R-C and an overhead power line on the eastern edge of Lot 2R-C. These facilities will need to remain in place with their current easements. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) to serve future residences when this proposal proceeds. • St. Margaret's Episcopal Church — 20900 Chenal Parkway.: Z-5773-B Entergy does not object to this proposal. There is an existing underground power line running from Chenal Parkway on the west to a padmount transformer at the NW corner of the existing worship center, but it does not appear to be in conflict with the proposed expansion. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. ■ Hyde Park Replat — Madison St between Charles Bussey & West 22nd : 5-1793 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Overhead power lines run along Charles Bussey to the north and along Madison to the west of this development. An existing underground, three phase, power line runs from Madison Street to a padmount transformer in the center of the property. This will need to be removed. The rest of Entergy's facilities do not appear to be in conflict with the proposed plans. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. ■ Norris Furniture — 3900 John Barrow Rd.: Z-6698-D Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the north of the property via an underground service line to the back of the building. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. Islamic Center of Little Rock —14900 Kanis Road: Z-7812-B Entergy does not object to this proposal. An existing three phase, power line exists on the west side of Kanis Road at this location, but does not appear to be in conflict with the proposed plans. There are a couple of small single phase lines which cross Kanis Road and extend into the property that will likely need to be removed prior to development commencing. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Mickles Short -form — 2904 South Arch St: Z-9219 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Service is already being provided to this property from the alley to the west of the property to the back of the building. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss any changes to electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this proposal proceeds. ■ 724 Woodrow Street — restaurant and car charging station — 724 South Woodrow St.: Z- 928 Entergy does not object to this proposal. A three phase power line exists along the east of the property along Woodrow Street and a single phase overhead line existing in the alley to the north of the property. Neither appears to be in conflict with the proposed plans. Caution should be used when constructing a drive underneath the existing power line to ensure that all proper clearances are maintained. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Markham Center Square Subdiv Site Plan — 9101 West Markham St.: S-1312-A Entergy does not object to this proposal. An existing overhead power line exists along West Markham Street on the north side of this property. It does not appear to be in conflict with the proposed development. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. If you need further assistance you may call me at 501-954-5158 or e-mail me at bneumei@entergy.com. Sincerely, Bernard Neumeier, P.E. Region Engineering Supervisor Entergy Arkansas, Inc. To: Donna James From: Captain Tony Rhodes / Captain John Hogue: Fire Marshal Comment for the followin Locations: Z-7500-F 14810 Cantrell Fire Hydrants. Date: May 9, 2017 Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loadln Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. 30' Tall Buildings -maintain aerial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Multi -Family Residential Developments As per Appendix D, Section 13106.1 of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1. Projects having more than 100 dwelling units. Multiple -family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all building, including nonresidential occupancies are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 As per Appendix D, Section D106.2 of the 2012 Arkansas Fire prevention Code Vol. 1. Projects having more than 200 dwelling units. Multiple -family residential projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-4470-1 10❑ Block of Wellington Hills Road Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Commercial and Industrial Developments —2 means of access. -Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Building or facilities exceeding 30 feet or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. Section D104.2 Building exceeding 62,000 square feet in area. Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provide with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all building are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 30' Tall Buildings - Maintain aerial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Dead Fnds_ Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Fire _Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-9200 Mann Road lust south Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. One- or Two -Family Residential Developments. As per Appendix D, Section D107.1 of the Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1, One- or Two -Family dwelling residential developments. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3. Exceptions: Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and al dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the Arkansas Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required. 2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. Fire Hvdrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. 5-1794 David O Dodd Road south of Koen Lane Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official S. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. One- or Two -Family Residential Developments. As per Appendix D, Section D107.1 of the Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1, One- or Two -Family dwelling residential developments. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3. Exceptions: Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and al dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the Arkansas Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required. 2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. Fire H drants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. t-5099-G South side of the Divide Parkw Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Commercial and Industrial Developments — 2 means of access. - Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Building or facilities exceeding 30 feet or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. Section D104.2 Building exceeding 62,000 square feet in area. Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provide with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all building are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 30' TaI I Build in s - Maintain aerial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. 13105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Fire Hvdrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-1412-C 1637 East 15t" Street Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. S-1626-A 7-11 Pine view Place Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Z-5773-B 20900 Chenal Parkway Full plan review Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. 30" Tall Buildings - Maintain aerial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positione'd shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. S-1793 Madison St. between Charles Busses and West 22"d street. Maintain Access: Fire Hvdrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. One- or Two -Family Residential Developments. As per Appendix D, Section D107.1 of the Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1, One- or Two -Family dwelling residential developments. Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3. Exceptions: 1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and al dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the Arkansas Fire Code, access from two directions shall not be required. 2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-6698-D 3900 John Barrow Road Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-7812-B 14900 Kanis Road Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Commercial and Industrial Developments — 2 means of access. - Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Building or facilities exceeding 30 feet or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. Section D104.2 Building exceeding 62,000 square feet in area. Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provide with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all building are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 30'Tall rial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-9219 2904 South Arch Street Full plans review Z-928 724 South Woodrow Street Full plans review S-1,p 91ol West Markham Street Full plans review Maintain Access: Fire-!Adran#s. hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Maintain fire apparatus access roads 1 fire by hydrant is h a Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road widthdw�tshalhber26 feet, exclusive of located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shoulders. Grade ' fire a aratus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol, Maintain pp 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loadii� endix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per App Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading•artmentapgaratus by way of an approved fire apparatus constructed shall be accessible to fire deg driving surface capable of supporting the access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approvedpounds. imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 p Fire H drants Fire H drants as per Appendix c of the 2012 Arkansas Fire 1 377vention Code. 1245) andaheSection O Locate Y Little RockFire Water Daniel kansas ny R C105, in conjunction with Cenhodesr501-918-3757(o rCapt. Jolhn Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Marshals Office (Capt. To Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Regards, Captain Rhodes and Captain Hogue Office: 918-3710 Z-1412-C Address: 1637 East 15t" Street Planninq Division: This request is located in 130 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Industrial (1) for this property. The Industrial (1) category encompasses a wide variety of manufacturing, warehousing research and development, processing, and industry related office and service activities. Industrial development typically occurs on an individual tract basis rather than according to an overall development plan. The applicant has applied for a revised PID (Planned Industrial Development) to allow outdoor seating and parking. Master Street Plan: North of the property is E 15th Street and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. East of the property is Security Ave and it is a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-4470-1 Address: 100 Block of Wellington Hills Road Planning Division: This request is located in Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Office (0) for this property The office category represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g., legal, financial, medical) as well as general offices which support more basic economic activities. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from 0-3 (General Office District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow construction of a Hotel and retail building with C-3 uses. Master Street Plan: East of the property is Wellington Hills Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Wellington Hills Road since it is a Minor Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of- way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-5099-G Address: North West side of The Chenal Parkway/ Cantrell Road Planning Division:_ This request is located in Pinnacle Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial(C) for this property. The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale sales of products, personal and professional services, and general business activities. Commercial activities vary in type and scale, depending on the trade area that they serve. The applicant has applied for revised existing PCD (Planned Commercial District) to allow for four lots of C-3 (General Commercial District) use. The request is within the Highway 10 Overlay District. Master Street Plan: North of the properties is Chenal Parkway and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. South of the properties is Cantrell Road and it is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Chenal Parkway since it is a Minor Arterial. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There is a Class I Bike Path shown along the Cantrell Road. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for they use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or/and easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). There is a Class 111 Bike Route shown on Chenal Parkway. These Bike Routes require no additional right-of-way, but either a sign or pavement marking to identify and direct the route. Z-5773-B Address: 20900 Chenal Parkway. Plannin Division: This request is located in Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institution (PI) for this property. Public Institutional category includes public and quasi -public facilities that provide a variety of services to the community such as schools, libraries, fire stations, churches, utility substations, and hospitals. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 CUP (Single Family District) (Conditional Use Permit) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) for Church Master Campus Plan. The request is within the Chenal Overlay District Master Street Plan: North of the property is Chenal Valley Drive and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. West of the Property is Chenal Parkway and it shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Chenal Parkway since it is a Principal Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan; There is a Class I Bike Path shown along the Chenal Parkway. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or/and easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). Z-6698-D Address: 3900 John Barrow Road Planning Division: This request is located in Boyle Park Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Office and Commercial (MOC) for this property. The Mixed Office and Commercial category provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. Acceptable uses are office or mixed office and commercial. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is mixed office and commercial. The applicant has applied for a revised Planned Commercial Development to add C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial District) uses as allowable uses. The request is within the John Barrow Road Overlay District Master Street Plan: East of the property is John Barrow Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on John Barrow Road since it is a Minor Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There is a Class II Bike Lane shown going along John Barrow Road. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z-7500-F Address: Behind 14810 Cantrell Road Planning Division: This request is located in River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) and Transitional (T). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. Transition is a land use plan designation that provides for an orderly transition between residential uses and other more intense uses. Uses that may be considered are low -density multi -family residential and office uses if the proposals are compatible with quality of life in nearby residential areas. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single Family District) and PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow a new apartment complex. Master Street Plan: There are no streets shown in the immediate vicinity. Bicycle Plan: A Class I Bike Path is shown. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or an easement is recommended. Thirteen -foot paths are recommended when not along streets. Z-7812-B Address: 14900 Kanis Road Plannin Division: This request is located in Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a revised PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow a school as an acceptable use. Master Street Plan: West of the property is Kanis Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Kanis Road. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan_: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9218 Address: 724 South Woodrow Street Planning Division: This request is located in 1630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single Family District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow a Contain Restaurant and electric car charging station. Master Street Plan: West of the property is South Woodrow Street and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. South of the property is Lamar Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on South Woodrow Street. The primary function of Local Streets is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity_ Z-9219 Address: 2904 South Arch Street Planninq Division:_ This request is located in Central City Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-4 (Single Family District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow for a Beauty Salon. Master Street Plan: East of the property is South Arch Street and it is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on South Arch Street since it is a Principal Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicvcle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along South Arch Street. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z-9220 Address: Mann Road just south of Wilderness Road Planning Division: This request is located in Geyer Springs West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Light Industrial (LI) and Park/Open Space (PKIOS) and Residential Low Density (RL) for the application area. The Light Industrial category provides for light warehouse, distribution or storage uses, and/or other industrial uses that are developed in a well -designed "park like" setting. The Park/Open Space category includes all public parks, recreation facilities, greenbelts, flood plains, and other designated open space and recreational land. The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Singe Family District) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow for a small lot single family subdivision. Master Street Plan: North of the application is Mann Street and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along Mann Rd. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z-1412-C Address: 1637 East 15tn Street Planninq Division: This request is located in 130 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Industrial (1) for this property. The Industrial (1) category encompasses a wide variety of manufacturing, warehousing research and development, processing, and industry related office and service activities. Industrial development typically occurs on an individual tract basis rather than according to an overall development plan. The applicant has applied for a revised PID (Planned Industrial Development) to allow outdoor seating and parking. Master Street Plan: North of the property is E 15th Street and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. East of the property is Security Ave and it is a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-4470-1 Address: 100 Block of Wellington Hills Road Planning Division: This request is located in Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Office (0) for this property The office category represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g., legal, financial, medical) as well as general offices which support more basic economic activities. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from 0-3 (General Office District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow construction of a Hotel and retail building with C-3 uses. Master Street Plan: East of the property is Wellington Hills Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Wellington Hills Road since it is a Minor Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of- way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-5099-G Address: North West side of The Chenal Parkway/ Cantrell Road Planning Division: This request is located in Pinnacle Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial(C) for this property. The Commercial category includes a broad range of retail and wholesale sales of products, personal and professional services, and general business activities. Commercial activities vary in type and scale, depending on the trade area that they serve. The applicant has applied for revised existing PCD (Planned Commercial District) to allow for four lots of C-3 (General Commercial District) use. The request is within the Highway 10 Overlay District. Master Street Plan: North of the properties is Chenal Parkway and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. South of the properties is Cantrell Road and it is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Chenal Parkway since it is a Minor Arterial. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There is a Class I Bike Path shown along the Cantrell Road. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the, use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or/and easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). There is a Class III Bike Route shown on Chenal Parkway. These Bike Routes require no additional right-of-way, but either a sign or pavement marking to identify and direct the route. Z-5773-B Address: 20900 Chenal Parkway. PlanningDivision: This request is located in Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institution (Pl) for this property. Public Institutional category includes public and quasi -public facilities that provide a variety of services to the community such as schools, libraries, fire stations, churches, utility substations, and hospitals. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 CUP (Single Family District) (Conditional Use Permit) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) for Church Master Campus Plan. The request is within the Chenal Overlay District Master Street Plan: North of the property is Chenal Valley Drive and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. West of the Property is Chenal Parkway and it shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Chenal Parkway since it is a Principal Arterial. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicvcle Plan: There is a Class I Bike Path shown along the Chenal Parkway. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or/and easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). Z-6698-D Address: 3900 John Barrow Road Planning Division: This request is located in Boyle Park Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Office and Commercial (MOC) for this property. The Mixed Office and Commercial category provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. Acceptable uses are office or mixed office and commercial. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is mixed office and commercial. The applicant has applied for a revised Planned Commercial Development to add C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial District) uses as allowable uses. The request is within the John Barrow Road Overlay District Master Street Plan: East of the property is John Barrow Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on John Barrow Road since it is a Minor Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There is a Class II Bike Lane shown going along John Barrow Road. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z-7500-F Address: Behind 14810 Cantrell Road Planning Division: This request is located in River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) and Transitional (T). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. Transition is a land use plan designation that provides for an orderly transition between residential uses and other more intense uses. Uses that may be considered are low -density multi -family residential and office uses if the proposals are compatible with quality of life in nearby residential areas. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single Family District) and PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow a new apartment complex. Master Street Plan: There are no streets shown in the immediate vicinity. Bicycle Plan: A Class I Bike Path is shown. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or an easement is recommended_ Thirteen -foot paths are recommended when not along streets. Z-7812-B Address: 14900 Kanis Road Planning Division: This request is located in Ellis Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a revised PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow a school as an acceptable use. Master Street Plan: West of the property is Kanis Road and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Kanis Road. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bic cle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9218 Address: 724 South Woodrow Street Planning Division: This request is located in 1630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single Family District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow a Contain Restaurant and electric car charging station. Master Street Plan: West of the property is South Woodrow Street and it is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. South of the property is Lamar Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on South Woodrow Street. The primary function of Local Streets is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9219 Address: 2904 South Arch Street Planning Division: This request is located in Central City Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL). The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-4 (Single Family District) to PCD (Planned Commercial Development) to allow for a Beauty Salon. Master Street Plan: East of the property is South Arch Street and it is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on South Arch Street since it is a Principal Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along South Arch Street. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z-9220 Address: Mann Road just south of Wilderness Road Planning Division: This request is located in Geyer Springs West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Light Industrial (LI) and Park/Open Space (PK/OS) and Residential Low Density (RL) for the application area. The Light Industrial category provides for light warehouse, distribution or storage uses, and/or other industrial uses that are developed in a well -designed "park like" setting. The Park/Open Space category includes all public parks, recreation facilities, greenbelts, flood plains, and other designated open space and recreational land. The Residential Low Density category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Singe Family District) to PDR (Planned Development Residential) to allow for a small lot single family subdivision. Master Street Plan: North of the application is Mann Street and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along Mann Rd. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Rock Region u METRO Rock Region METRO Planning and Subdivision Review Memo To: City of Little Rock Planning and Development, Dana Carney, Monte Moore From: Kathleen Lambert, Sr. Transit Planner Date: May 12, 2017 Re: Subdivision Reviews, June 8, 2017 hearing 1) Z-7812-B Islamic Center of Little Rock —West PDR- School,149oo Kan is Road a) Location is not currently served by METRO, but is in our long range plans. We suggest that the site plan connect the sidewalks from the sreet to the front of building for future transit service. METRO would expectto serve a facility of this nature with para-transit serve for students, aged residents and those with disabilities. Any canopies that overhang the drive aisle must be high enough to serve passengers at the entrance to the building as required byADA. Verify heights with METRO paratransit vehicle documentation. 2) S-1312-A Markham Center Square, 91o1 West Markham Street, Subdivision Plan Review a) Location is served by METRO on route 5 West Markham. The bus stop is located along the sidewalk adjacent to the entrance curb -cut from the new fast food restaurant drive through. We are concerned about the amount of cars and car stacking in the area where pedestrians access the shopping center. We recommend protected pedestrian way stripping through the parking area for refuge. 3) Z-928 724 Woodrow St, PCD- Container Restaurant and Electric car charging station a) Location is served by METRO on route 5 West Markham. Stops are located on nearby 7th St. We recommend a protected pedestrian way from the sidewalk to the front of business. 901 Maple Street, North Little Rock 72214 rrmetro.org 501-375-6717p z 4) Z-9219 Mickles, PDC — 2904 South Arch Street, Beauty Salon a) Location is served nearby by route 2 South Main. Metro does not support addition of surface parking in the residential neighborhood when there is ample on street parking. 5) Z-6698-D Norris Furniture PCD- 390o John Barrow Road a) Location is served by route 9 West Central/ J. Barrow. The building is located on the transit route and the stop is nearby at 46th Street. We recommend sidewalk repairs as needed for access to the transit route. 6) 5-1793 Hyde Park replot of (24) residential lots, Madison St between Charles Bussey and 22"d St a) Location is served by METRO on route 16 UALR. We have no objections to the replat of the residential lots. 7) Z-5773-B St. Margaret Episcopal Church PDR, 20900 Chenal Parkway a) Location is not currently served by METRO but is on our long range plans. We advise the site plan include sidewalks for future access to the transit route. METRO would expectto serve a facility of this nature with pars -transit serve for students, aged residents and those with disabilities. Any canopies that overhang the drive aisle must be high enough to serve passengers at the entrance to the building as required by ADA. Verify heights with METRO paratransit vehicle documentation. 8) 5-1626-A Stephens Addition Replat- Lots 2R-a, 2R-b and 2R-c, 7-11 Pine View Place a) Location is not currently served by METRO. We have not objections to the replat of these lots. 9) Z-1412-C 1637 East 15th Street, outdoor seating, bar and parking, PID a) Location is served by METRO on route 20 Hanger Hill/ College Station. We have no objection to the plans as shown. Provide sidewalk improvments as needed along transit route. 10) Z-5o99-G Lots 9B-(E Territory PCD, AR State Highway 10, Cantrell Rd. M a) Location is served by METRO on route 25 Roland Express. The location on Chenal has seen an increase in ridership commuting from downtown to employment in West Little Rock. The route is in our future long range plans for increased frequency. Connect sidewalks to building entrances for access to the transit route. 3.3.) 5-1794 Wisteria Addition Preliminary Plat, David O. Dodd Road south of Koen Lane a) Location is not currently served by METRO but it is in our long range plans. We have no objections to the preliminary plat. We do recommend minimizing dead end streets which impacts future service especially paratransit, making the federally mandated service more expensive. iz) Z-922o The Parks residential development Mann Rd. a) Location is served by METRO on route zz. The development of this neighborhood street grid is important for residents to have access to the transit and paratransit services. Dead-end "lollipop" streets and disconnected sidewalk networks will impede resident's access to transit. We recommend along with the neighborhood exits on Mann Road that Peace Valley Road be improved and provided as an access exit out of the neighborhood. This will connectthe transit route and provide efficient routing for paratransit services. 13) Z-447o-1 Chenal Commercial Park, PCD ioo Block of Wellington Hills Rd. a) Location is not currently served by METRO but is in our long range plans. Please provide more detail in site plan regarding the pedestrian access to the site. 14) Z-7500 Hamilton Apartments, near 3.4810 Cantrell Rd. PDR a) The location is served by METRO nearby on route z5 Roland Express. The preliminary site plan does not show the road, pedestrian connection or in this case connections to the bike trail along Pinnacle Valley Rd. Please provide more information as to how the development would integrate to local transportation systems. James, Donna From-. Townsend, Andrew W <andrew.townsend@centerpointenergy.com> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 4:28 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Centerpoint Energy Comments: File# Z-9220 Donna, please see below comments for File# Z-9220: "Centerpoint Energy currently owns and operates two natural gas transmission lines in parallel which run diagonally through the property from the southwest to the northeast. There is a "transmission line" indicated on the proposed plat, but it does not indicate if this is a gas, electric, or other type of transmission line. Therefore, please be advised that Centerpoint Energy requires the existing easement containing the Centerpoint Energy gas transmission lines remain in place and not be encroached upon." Thank you, Andrew W. Townsend Engineer It I Southern Gas operations I Arkansas/Oklahoma Region 441 W, Capitol Ave, Suite 600 I Little Rock, AR 72201 ❑ftiee.501-377-4679 1 Fax:501-377-4733 j Mobile:501-519-1836 Andrew. Townsend ente ❑int ne corn Little Rock Wastewater Comments Project Number S-1312-A Project Name Project Type Markham Center Square Subdiv - Multi Bldg Site plan Subdivision Project Number S-1626-A Project Name Project Type Stephens Addition Replat Replat - Single Family Project Number S-1793 Project Name Hyde Park Replat Project Number S-1794 Project Name Wisteria Addition Comment Made Sewer Available to this site. EAD Analysis Required. LRW records indicate sewer easement is 5' each side of exist. 12" sewer main. Easement must be retained, no building encroachment allowed. Comment Made Sewer Available to this site. Separate service connection required for each lot. Project Type Comment Made Replat Sewer main extension required with easements if new sewer service is required for this project. Project Type Comment Made Preliminary Plat Sewer main extension required with easements if new sewer service is required for this project. Project Number Z-1412-C Project Name LBPC Project Number Z-4470-1 Project Name Chenal Commercial Park Lot 2 Project Number Z-5099-C Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Industrial Sewer Available to this site. Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Commercial Sewer Available to this site. Capacity Fee analysis required. Project Name Project Type Comment Made Lots 96-9E Northwest Planned Development: Commercial Sewer main extension required with easements if new Territory sewer service is required for this project. EAD Analysis required Project Number Z-5773-B Project Name Project Type Comment Made Page 1 of 2 Thursday, May 11, 2017 St. Margaret's Episcopal Ch Planned Development: Residential Sewer Available to this site. Capacity Fee analysis required. Project Number Z-6698-D Project Name Project Type Comment Made Norris Furniture Planned Development: Commercial Sewer Available to this site. Please confirm whether sewer main is under building. Project Number Z-7500-F Project Name Project Type Comment Made The Hamilton Apartments Planned Development: Residential Sewer Main Relocation with new easements required as drawn. Exchange or abandonment of easement requires LRWRC approval. Capacity Fee Analysis required. Project Number Z-7812-8 Project Name Islamic Center of Little Rock - West Project Number Project Name Mickles Project Number Project Name The Parks Z-9219 Z-9220 Project Number Z-928 Project Name 724 Woodrow Street Container Restaurant Thursday, May 11, 2017 Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Residential - Sewer main extension required with easements if new School sewer service is required for this project. Capacity Fee Analysis Required; LRWRC Approval required if pumping out of basin Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Commercial Sewer Available to this site. Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Residential Sewer main extension required with easements if new sewer service is required for this project. Engineering Study required for capacity of receiving lines. Project Type Comment Made Planned Development: Commercial Sewer Available to this site. EAD Analysis required. Page 2of2 mes, Donna porn: Celeste Cori r--vor <connorceleste@ ,5em: Thursday, July ZO 2017 10:52 AM gmail.com> -ro: James, Donr-1 SLjbject: Objection to Z_7500-F ( and Z-5817-1 for that matter) ex Celia Martin and Peggy Williams, I arrz Packet at tod'ay's meeting. Apologies for the d ntacting you so that you may include this in the C p elay, but we have been out of town. °mmission� While we have only lived at 5500 Tulley Gvzr� for a s mlor's flood ripped 1/3 of our new galvanized year, We have, already Spent about A steep fence (intended to rotect our disc 1 dk in repairs after n�ig}pool and from wandering) out o f the ground, und, concrete P bled 5 Yr old son from completed in the back. Our costs are minirna2 when corn and all, and Obliterated the landscaping services into our neighborhood because of the Pared t° concerns with recei t of emergencyp ng we disruption of the ecosystem and what effect t hooding' Furthermore we P or med; are very concerned about the flooding and drainage issues are not address ed twill continue to have if this and other projects Proceed AND -for example, in our yard alone since the spring_nood incident our do lumbar disk disease by the way) has caught 3 rats, faced do g (a Syr old, miniature dachshund with lcingsnakes. We've added mosquito spray serv1e down 2 adult and 1 bah e due to the fact that Y copperhead, and 2 time it rains. Our bird feeders are overrun with squirrels and common birds, a standing water each overcrowded and have been driven out to search for food ,whose habitats are now d every become true of the deer population, forcingthe 'Potentially bringing discaSe m out into residential roads �� them. accidents. Nuisance animals forced out of their epos ecosystems Can also lead s c r route 10 This v�nll also Y ,Potentially causing This seemingly small point of drainage can become quite a large concern to the Damage -Carry this thought on mmunitY. grankly, when we made the offer on this home, We were told it was issues with flooding. We love this home and xiexghboorhood NOT in a flood plain and that there Were no question and further urbanization is on the table, Had we and are Quite distressed that the Land U elsewhere. We like to spend where we live, as most people known, �'e would likely have taken our tax dollar is in will move out of the county and spend their mane p p If the Commission continues these antics folks businesses and live in these apartments? Points tv pond here as well. Then, who will patronize these Best Regards, Celeste Connor Dr. David E Connor, Jr 5500 Tulley CovePer Celia IKIVirus -free. www.avast.com James, Donna From: dgay1972@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 4:52 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Development on Cantrell Mr. James, Hope you are well. I am writing you in regards to the apartment development purposed by Mr.Rees. I am a business man and understand that land in and of itself has little value unless something is done with it. There is a time and a place for things and this is neither the time or place. I couldn't think of a worse location to put something like that in. The traffic at this area is very heavy and there has been numerous incidents of flooding as well. The apartment development is not going to help either of these causes. I am disappointed that the meetings that concern our area are not held in our area. It is very difficult for people with families to get downtown and have a voice. Mr.Rees is a very influential person but community has to come before profit. He speculated when he bought the property. Our cor-nmunity is under no obligation to see he makes a profit. You turned your back on us when you allowed the Murphy station. That station turned out to be not so bad but if you allow this development you will not be so lucky you can't close your eyes and hope for the best this project has some huge negatives. Thanks David Gay 43 Westchester Ct. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 RE: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. ■ Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. ■ TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Cecelia Renee' Crater 7 Canterbury Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Nicholas Alsop <pinnaclevalley@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:46 PM To: Director Peck; James, Donna; Director Adcock Cc: Bob Tramell; Celia Martin; Enos Jones; Grey Williams; Keith Wingfield; m Morrell Subject: Opposition to Hamilton apartments Z-74000-F Dear planning commissioners, As president of the Pinnacle Valley Neighborhood Association, our association of more than 240 households strongly oppose the development or rezoning of the property to allow for the development of the Hamilton apartments. The number of reasons is beyond the scope of this email but it is important to note, it is totally out of character for this neighborhood and will exacerbate further the flooding issues in the area and will affect traffic density and overload the intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell Road. I wish for this letter to be entered into the minutes of the planning commission meeting on July 20. You are welcome to contact me by phone/text and or email. Nicholas Alsop President of the Pinnacle Valley Neighborhood Association 6 Waterford Dr., Little Rock, AR 722223 501-590-1414 PinnacleV alley@Gmail. com Serving Under His Mercy, Nicholas Alsop President of the Pinnacle Valley Neighborhood Association 6 Waterford Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 501-590-1414 innaclevalle ail.com ht s:/l innaclevalle .nextdoor.coml James, Donna From: Bob Craig <bobcraig828@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 12:00 PM To: James, Donna Subject: RE: Z-750OF Dear Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE application Z-7500F, an oversized and unneeded 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. o Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. a Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes. Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being jammed into this small area? ■ 4 stories, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. • What about floodplain issues? Flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center, flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek, flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell creating even more safety issues. to the. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will add to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD has not fulfilled those expectations. Approving this application will only accelerate the decay of this beautiful area. My neighborhood contains 71 homes and we have but a single traffic connector: Westbury Drive which joins Highway 10 with no protected access (e.g. stoplight) just east of Taylor Loop and Highway 10. 1 am very concerned about our already dangerous traffic situation and I hope that you would be as well. If safety and quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Sincerely, Robert Craig President, Westbury Neighborhood Association 9 Westchase Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 501-690-3700 James, Donna From: Esmeralda Rodriguez <esmetex47@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:59 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-7500-F, The Hamilton Apartments TO: The Planning Commission I strongly oppose the change of zoning classification requested by Rees Commercial. The proposed re -zoning for a 248-unit apartment complex would allow an urban project in a suburban setting. I attended the July 11 meeting Mr. Rees held at the Fellowship Bible Church. From that meeting, I'm certain Mr. Rees understands the neighboring communities strongly oppose his proposed dense apartment complex on a mere 10 acres. I'm also certain that Mr. Rees and his engineers believe they can convince most that they are doing us a favor - i.e., bring $$$ to the area, improved flooding problem, only minor increase to traffic density, etc. I respectfully request that the Commissioners challenge Mr. Rees and his traffic engineer re the negative effects in traffic along Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop. The Rees' traffic engineer presentation of current morning/evening gush hour trips at the Cantrell/Taylor Loop intersection to purported number of trips after the building of the apartments are miniscule and nonsensical. Also, I request that the Commissioners challenge Mr. Rees and his engineer re floodingldrainage issues. We've had several signifeant floodings on Pinnacle Valley Road (my home is on the Pinnacle Valley Court subdivision). I seriously doubt that the proposed "water holding tanks" are sufficient to compensate for the stripping of 10 acres of dense forest trees. I trust the Planning Commission will support the current master plan for Highway 10 and reject the change in zoning requested by Rees Commerical company. Esmeralda Rodriguez 16 Ison Creek Cove Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Jan and Dale Johnston <dej82552@aol.com> Sent:Wednesday, July 19, 2017 10:22 AM To: James, Donna Subject: With Reference to Rezoning Z-750OF With Reference to Z-7500F Planning Commissioners: We are strongly OPPOSED to the application for the proposal of a four story apartment building behind the Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. The zoning in this area has been for single family homes. Changing this to zoning for multi -family homes totally changes the immediate neighborhood and every surrounding single family neighborhood and business in the area! Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 will allow the construction of this huge four story building which is taller than any other structure in the area. At an north elevation of 60 feet and south elevation of 50 feet this apartment building will be massive. Subsequently these apartments will dwarf any single family home in the area. As a result there will a devaluation of every single family home in the area. Into this huge building, there will be 250 apartments with 442 parking places. The impact on immediate area will significant and detrimental. With this increase in cars and people in a concentrated area, there will be an increase in public service and utility demands such as roads, water, sewage etc. Traffic congestion in this area is already a problem. With the construction of apartments on Rahling Road, more traffic is already expected along the Taylor Loop to Cantrell intersection. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only add to the population density and traffic that already exists in the area. Imagine 442 additional cars in the area! I suggest that you travel along Cantrell at the Taylor Loop intersection at rush hour in the morning/evening and with pre and post school traffic to actually see how dense the traffic can be already. Adding to this traffic creates safety issues for every vehicle that travels in that corridor. It also is a problem for many businesses in the immediate area. Try to make a left hand turn into some of the businesses and residential areas where there isn't a light at the intersection and you take your life into your hands! Every single cyclist who travels along Pinnacle Valley Road would also be in jeopardy due to the increase in vehicular traffic along this corridor. Safety is of extreme importance! Flooding and drainage in this area is also an issue. There has been flooding along Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. There has been flooding and erosion from Isom Creek into adjacent shopping centers. Also, there are plenty of rental properties already available in the Little Rock area with vacancies. The apartments to be built along Rahling Road are only a half mile away from this proposed development. The infrastructure in this area was designed for single family homes within a suburban neighborhood as designated in a master plan years ago. There is no need to change this plan. I encourage you to vote AGAINST any rezoning of this property from R2 single-family homes to MF 18-24. Dale and Janice Johnston 33 Woodberry Road Little Rock, AR 72212 James, Donna From: Susan Foster <swfoster599@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 9:39 AM To: James, Donna; James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF Rezoning behind Buffalo Wild Wings on Cantrell RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Susan Foster 4318 Oaks Bluff Drive James, Donna From: Anne Allen <acallen@allenmail.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 8:10 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Rezoning in WLR for Apt. Bldg. behind Buffalo Wild Wings Thank you for submitting my letter of concern regarding the proposed rezoning in WLR for an apartment building that would seriously impair the already overcrowded intersection where Cantrell Rd. and Taylor Loop intersect, ESPECIALLY IN PEAK HOURS!!!! I also understand that this proposed development would further worsen the existing flooding issues in the Fuller Hardware shopping center and along the Isom Creek. The City of Little Rock, with special emphasis on the City Planning Commission, has a sworn duty to work in the BEST INTERESTS of the City of Little Rock!!!! Yielding to the solely financial special interests of the ONLY FOR PROFITS commercial entities of this area with total disregard for the wishes and concerns of local residents only increases the liabilities facing our fair city!!! Major parking problems and traffic congestion already are serious issues in Little Rock. Read your papers and listen to your news; and you will know what the rest of the nation already is noting: Little Rock, and sometimes Arkansas, are beginning to be ranked toward the top of the lists for "WORST Places to LIVE"M We now have many problems to work through and solve; PLEASE don't add to our already burdensome list!!!! Thank you for thinking FIRST about serving Little Rock as she would be served!!! Charles and Anne Allen The Affiens 11 Bayonne Court Little Rock, AR 72223-9108 (501) 868-0817 acallen@allenmail.net James, Donna From: Betty Danielson <bobbet2901 @att.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:30 PM To: James, Donna Subject: New apartment building behind Wild Wings on Cantrell Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to IVIF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. ■ This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? a 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Betty Danielson 4605 Westchester Dr Little Rock AR 72223 James, Donna From: Barbara Lee <barbara.lee17@live.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:02 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Hamilton Apts. 7500 F I am opposed to the building of the Hamilton Apts. Traffic/flooding are problems without additional construction. The Hwy 10 Plan has been altered enough. My subdivision has one entrance. The existing problems need to be corrected without adding to them. Barbara Lee 17 Westchase Dr. 72223 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 James, Donna From: Carolyn Ludwig <cludwig3804@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:45 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Regarding: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, i OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all corning and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Thank you, Carolyn Ludwig 4 River Estates Cove Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Robert3ramel <tramel@earthlink.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:35 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Proposed apartments near Taylor Loop and Cantrell My husband and I moved from the county into Little Rock 9 years ago and built at 7 Pinnacle Valley Court. The neighborhood was zoned as single family and that specifically influenced our choice to become a Little Rock resident and payer of city property taxes. I'm opposed to the building of a 4 story apartment complex in my neighborhood. The area is zoned single family and should remain so. Traffic congestion is already significant and will be amplified with the addition of this multifamily unit. There is no need for additional apartments in West Little Rock. According to apartments.com, as of this date, there are 1,122 available apartments for rent in the City of Little Rock, with approximately 1/3 of those situated West of 1-430 and North of Chenal Parkway. I am not against progress. I do feel that individuals should be able to base their making of a significant investment in our community in the form of building in Little Rock and paying property taxes on a zoning assignment that will not change. In essence: Do not allow the building of this apartment building and hold to the original zoning. Most sincerely, Kim Tramel 7 Pinnacle Valley Court Little Rock, AR 72223 , Donna Bev Milford <bevmilford7@comcast.net> Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:02 PM James, Donna Rezoning of land b Wild wings and Walgreen in WLR SE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and ,00p. ing from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved ial developments and businesses alike. ing from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property acing the value of those homes ing from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this 1. s a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex. that tries to fit into a surrounding residential ,rhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it ,ammed into this small area? i, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. ,DING. What about flood plain issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. 'FIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! ,ing to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak mes. ;h the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the hustle of the city and )ned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application .y add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please this application. Several years ago Walmart wanted to build in this area and one of the reason it was opposed is that it n-ge complex that would draw more traffic to the area and would not fit in with the housing and existing businesses due ze. let us keep some of the beauty in this area that makes West Little Rock so special. A tall building will start a trend more tall buildings that block our view of nature. (Milford Morrison Road :ock, AR 72212 James, Donna From: John G Shelton <jg.shelton@icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 3:16 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF I am emailing to voice my opposition to the rezoning and planned construction of a 4 story apartment building at Cantrell Rd and Taylor Loop. Our neighborhood does not need the added traffic at this intersection. Especially since the construction of the mega gas station across the road and the countless apartments. There are many large vacant tracts for sale all around this area that are already zoned for this type of construction. Deltic Timber has just cleared about seven blocks on Rahling Rd Rezoned to build whatever they want which is going to cause huge traffic problems. Please don't add to these existing problems and ruin our neighborhood further. Thank you, John Shelton 4 Mount pilot court Little Rock,Ar 501-868-9916 Sent from my iPhone !-7500F ling Commissioners, )OSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild ;s at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. k1though the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of he DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor A the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and ;ountry. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to hose dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Lock, please DENY this application. )aniel J. Hennessey Jizabeth S. Hennessey �0 Westchester Court .ittle Rock, AR 72223 >01-868-4091 James, Donna From: jeffreylnissen@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:47 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Proposed apartments at Cantrell & Taylor Loop Please do NOT approve the proposed apartment building at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. I live close by and this intersection is way too congested as it is. The center turn lanes are a mess already with all of the strip malls and businesses along this stretch. The Murphy gas station going up was a mistake. Please do not make things worse. It will be much too dangerous for the families that live there. Jeff Nissen 4019 Valley View Drive Sent from my Wad James, Donna From: Bonnie Griffin <bonnieg1024@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 10:44 AM To: James, Donna Subject: RE: Z-750OF PLEASE OPPOSE! RE: Z-750OF PLEASE OPPOSE! Planning Commissioners, Dear Commission Members: As an architect, I have great concerns of a development of this type in this location. The height of the building relative to the neighboring ones, is out of proportion for the area; The traffic congestion at this intersection, which is a very dangerous one, would become unnavigable; And the resulting storm water run-off will endanger many homes and business on BOTH sides of Cantrell Road. The developer should look at other areas of the City to develop this project, where the building massing is complementary to the surrounding area, the traffic wouldn't be so negatively impacted, and flooding will not impact the area. Specifically, my backyard backs up to the creek just east of Good Earth Nursery. As you are aware, this creek is major part of the storm water system in west Little Rock. This Creek cannot withstand more runoff to deal with! My street drains into this creek and, thus, has flooded numerous times. I am not in the 100 year floor plain but have had water with 10 feet of my house, due to the undersized capacity of the surrounding drainage systems. Please do not allow any more major development in this area until you remedy the drainage problems! We are tax paying citizens who need their City provide adequate and acceptable flooding protection. THUS I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. ■ Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. ■ Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? ■ 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. ■ FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. ■ TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! ■ Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and,going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Bonnie Griffin 41 Westchester Court Little Rock AR 72223 Donna cheryl Born <cborn@sbcglobal.net> Tuesday, July 18, 2017 10:30 AM James, Donna Opposition to Application POSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo ings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. ling from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially � approved residential developments and businesses alike. ling from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved he north property line reducing the value of those homes ning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 er acre for this proposal. s a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a ble and compatible with a large nding residential neighborhood. The size is more compara )uiiding or educational institutio�i Wh�Ythe area this alcrammed l. Will dwarf hesmall sur�aunding homes ry, 50--60 feet above grade. Nothing isineses. DING. What about flood plane issues—floodingkFloadinhe Fuller Hardware of Pinnacle Valley shopping center. this year ng and erosion of property across Isom g y� FFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the is and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! ming to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, ially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly rbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. igh the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the ryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. )OD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those lung expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please ( this application. es and Cheryl Born ayonne Ct W-1130 .rom my iPhone James, Donna From: Sharon Moskwiak <smoskwiak@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 10:25 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Rezoning Taylor Loop for Apartment Building Dear Ms. James, I am writing as a concerned resident of West Little Rock who is opposed to the rezoning of the Taylor Loop area to build a 4-story apartment building at an already heavily congested intersection. If you, or any member of this commission, has ever driven in that area during rush hours, you would know that the traffic at that intersection is already out of hand. And, you are now proposing to increase the traffic by over 440 vehicles. Not only is the thought of increased traffic reason enough to oppose this, there is also a flooding issue in the Fuller Hardware shopping center and along Isom Creek. This development would only exacerbate this issue. The construction alone of a building this size would be detrimental to the local businesses in the area as well. Surely there is another location that the Commission can rezone that would be more suitable for a project this size. I urge you and the Commission to rethink this and before you move forward with anything, you take a serious look at this area and the undo traffic headaches this project will cause, not only during construction, but also once completed and the building is at full occupancy. Thank you for allowing me to voice my concern. This is a very important issue and it needs to be discussed thoroughly before any decision is made. Sharon Moskwiak James, Donna From: Debbe <tripwit@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 9:32 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Opposition to Z-750OF RE: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? This would be devastating to all surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF 18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. James and Debra Triplett 14410 Taylor Loop Rd Little Rock, AR 72223 ames, Donna rom: Emily Russ <emilyaruss@gmail.com> ent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 9:32 AM o: James, Donna ubject: OPPOSE apartment complex in our community!!!! .E: Z-750OF lanning Commissioners, OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild dings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, specially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been pproved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 3 units per acre for this proposal. This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a arge office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding comes and busineses. FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. ,'looding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this ,ear already. TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the ►atterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Thoughtfully, Emily and Ryan Russ 15 Westchester Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Lora Porter <lora19@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 9:15 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners I oppose the application for this proposal of a 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. This rezoning is contrary to the existing zoning plans. The apartment building would be placed into a residential neighborhood and would cause a tremendous increase in traffic at this intersection which is already heavily travelled. The 4 story building would dwarf surrounding homes and businesses. We are long term residents of the Westchester neighborhood and have been repeatedly disappointed by the continued development in this area which is contrary to keeping this area as a scenic corridor into Little Rock. Please deny this application! Lora and Skip Porter 19 Westchester Court Little Rock AR 72223 James, Donna From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:30 AM To: Greg Sullivan; Harper, Vance Cc: James, Donna Subject: RE: DASH Replat Public works is OK to approve the replat. Donna, Do you need a sheet from me? Vince Floriani, P.E. Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering 701 W. Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-371-4817 From: Greg Sullivan [mailto:Greg.Sullivan@craftontull.com] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 9:52 AM To: Harper, Vance Cc: Floriani, Vince; James, Donna Subject: DASH Replat Vance, I wanted to check on the status of your review of the attached plat. I believe I addressed your comments and sent you an updated plat on 5/16/17. If not, one is attached. I would like to get this filed today, but Donna is waiting on Public Works approval. I would appreciate it if you could take a look and let her know if everything looks good. Thanks, Greg Sullivan, P.L.S. Survey Supervisor Cr afton Tull U. Direct: 501-748-8241 1 Mobile: 501-773-5879 10825 Financial Centre Parkway, Ste 300 Little Rock, AR 72211-3554 www.craftontull.com 101 �0) Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 1 addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you, we appreciate your cooperation. E-750OF ning Commissioners, )OSE the application for this proposal of a 4-story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at rell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. This is a massive single apartment building, not an apartment complex that tries to fit into the surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. FLOODING. What about flood plain issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. k1though the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of he DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor )f the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and ;ountry. The DOD has not lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add o those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Lock, please DENY this application. Culbreth ,2 Taylor Loop Rd. ! Rock, Ar 72223. James, Donna From: Kathy Stephenson <kathys@saclr.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:17 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Opposed to the rezoning of land for apartments This letter is in regards to the rezoning application that would allow a 4 story, 50-60ft tall, single apartment building with 250 units, 442 parking spaces with its entrance at the back of the commercial drive between Walgreens and Buffalo Wild Wings. As a resident of Longleaf Cove I am opposed to this being built in an area where the traffic is already causing such troubles. I also do not understand the need for more apartments when there is a high unoccupied rate. Please do not create a more unpleasant commute for those of us living west of this area! Thank you, Kathy Stephenson Kathy Stephenson 11 Longleaf Cove Little Rock, AR 72223 501.515.3038 James, Donna From: Suzette <suzettermsmith@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:05 PM To: James, Donna Subject: RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Sincerely Suzette Martel Smith 5 White Aspen Court Little Rock, AR 72212 James, Donna From: msaar824@comcast.net Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:01 PM To: James, Donna Subject: P-750OF RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, The Westchester/Heatherbrae Neighborhood OPPOSES the application for this proposal of a massive apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? Are flood plain issues sufficiently addressed? • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Michael B. Saar, President Westchester/Heatherbrae Neighborhood Association 14316 Taylor Loop Road James, Donna From: Robert Moellers <dianemoellers@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:39 PM To: James, Donna Subject: RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. Y Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. 7 This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and businesses. ■ FLOODING. What about flood plain issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Mr. & Mrs. Robert & Diane Moellers 4717 Westchester Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Kelly Lasseigne <kellylasseigne@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:42 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Apartments at Taylor loop and highway 10 I am writing to voice my opposition to the planned development of apartments behind Buffalo Wild Wings on highway 10. The LAST thing that is needed at this already crazy busy intersection is an apartment high rise. Nobody who lives over here wants this and I really hope you think about those people as opposed to the big business. Please don't pass this. Kelly Lasseigne Imes, Donna om: Carney, Dana ant• Friday, July 14, 2017 10:48 AM �. Collins, Gilbert; James, Donna abject: FW: Vote NO for the Hamilton Apartments! •om: Peggy Wells[mailto:peggywells1508@comcast.net] ant: Friday, July 14, 2017 10:37 AM D: caberry1955@gmaiLcom; dabubbus@ualr.edu; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; jd@wilcompany.com; ecky@beckyfinney.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; may37@sbcg!obal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net; Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> ubject: Vote NO for the Hamilton Apartments! here is proposal to rezone a —10 acre tract north of the Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop Intersection by Rees Commercial develop a 250 unit apartment complex — referred to as the Hamilton Apartments. The project is being proposed on a iece of property of 10.75 acres with two four story apartment buildings with a north elevation of 60 feet and southern levation of 50 feet. I live at 4 Ison Creek Cove in the Pinnacle Valley Court Subdivision, and I am against rezoning the iroperty from single family unit to multi -family unit to allow the building of the Hamilton Apartments. This is an urban iroject being proposed for a suburban neighborhood. here is a Hwy 10 plan developed years ago as a master plan for this area, and we need to stick to it. Why? "he infrastructure in this area was designed for single family units — both current and future. To change the zoning will ncrease demands on drainage, roads, and sewage in an area that is already at peak demand. Many owners of the )roperty adjacent to the proposed development are already experiencing flooding, erosion, and drainage issues. Traffic )roblems are at an all-time high. It will be very costly to the city to retrofit the additional infrastructure required to candle the proposed rezoning. Our taxes are high enough already. )lease vote against rezoning this property parcel from single -family -residential to multi -family -units. No a artments! Vlary M (Peggy) Wells I Ison Creek Cv Little Rock, AR 72223 501-448-2475 James, Donna From: Sallie Oliphant <sallieoliphant@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 1:06 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Ryan Subject: Z-750OF Mr James I wanted to write and express my concern over this proposed multi -family development. My concerns are related to area traffic, property values, and crime. Thanks Sallie Oliphant 412-480-9664 3507 Hidden Valley Dr Little Rock, AR 72212 James, Donna From: Susan Johnson <suzkjohn@att.net> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 5:33 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Apartments at Cantrell and Taylor Loop RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, We OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a massive apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • What about flood plain issues? • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Susan and Charles Johnson 48 Ledgelawn Court Little Rock, ..Arkansas 72202 5 June 2017 Ms. Donna James Subdivision Administrator, City of Little Rock 723 W Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Subject: Rezoning application Z-7500-F, The Hamilton Apartments Dear Ms. James, My property, Pinnacle Valley Plaza, borders the subject property on the South Side and fronts on Cantrell Road at Taylor Loop Road. After reviewing Preliminary Plans #C-102, I have some Very serious concern regarding the impact on my property should this application be approved. My concerns are: 1. Drainage. The elevation of the subject property, which adjoins my property, is approximately 4 feet higher than the rear of my property. Their filled property is the result of several years of dumping landfill on the subject property. The drainage area is now an open ditch containing trees, trash and undergrowth. Drainage is a major concern because the 4 foot build-up could have a disastrous impact on my property. Because this application lies in an existing floodway, I am deeply concerned that the amount of concrete, the raised building site, and the density of the subject building will force and divert these waters to flood my shopping center. We have not seen a plan to understand how run off, detention -retention, or permeable surfaces will function to limit impacts on adjoining properties, or on the flood way. What method does he propose to control the drainage from the property? Has the builder submitted drainage details? How will the city insure that proper drainage is installed to comply with item #16 under Grading and Drainage notes? Who will be responsible to insure that Item #10 under Grading and Drainage notes will be followed? 2. Screening and Landscape. What type screening is proposed? Item #11 refers to the `Landscape Plan'. Is this Plan available for my review? Were permits obtained for the fill that was placed on the subject property? To my knowledge, the Contractor has made no effort to meet with the Neighborhood Association or area Merchants Association to discuss this development. As a property owner, I had to personally obtain a copy of the Property Plans for the development. 3 Fencing. There is a wooden fence on my property that borders the subjects' property and hides the drainage ditch. Does the Developer plan to replace this fence? 4 Density. What is the maximum density allowed on the subject property? The plans show over 225 apartments contained within one structure. Isn't that too massive for this property which is adjoined by an over 45 lot housing subdivision, now under construction? 5 Parking. I am concerned that apartment residents will park overflow automobiles and recreational vehicles on my property. Have the proper number of apartment parking sites been allocated and what are the required dimensions of each space? 6 Will there be a study by city traffic engineers as to the impact that increased traffic will have on the ingress and egress to adjoining properties and merchants? With the additional potential of 250 families using the North Taylor Loop access to this giant apartment complex and the 45 individual homes in his connecting housing development, this will effectively eliminate any left turn into and out of my property. If the subject application is approved, it will, without question, have an adverse effect on the surrounding properties; therefore, I am requesting today that the rezoning application Z-7500-F, the Hamilton Apartments, be denied. I have served on the Little Rock Planning Commission and I am well aware of your time involved and of the difficulty in reviewing and processing these applications. Thank you for your efforts. Respectfully submitted, vYl ��-d'►'� Sid Brandon, CEO Doug Brandon Properties CC: Little Rock Planning Commissioners James, Donna From: Mamie Seamans <mamieseamans@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 10:47 AM To: James, Donna Subject: Apartment building I am a resident of the Secluded Hills area and strongly do not want an apartment building to be build behind Walgreens out on Highway 10, Cantrell. This had been s quiet neighbor hood.. But the traffic on Cantrell has increased so much in the past year, I can't see adding an apartment house in this area they will increase it that much more.. Increase in traffic means more traffic to our quiet neighborhood, and more vandalism, I don't want that... Mamie Seamans Sent from my iPhone James, Donna From: Keith Wingfield <Keith@riverrockbuilders.net> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 2:17 PM To: James, Donna Cc: brandon@renaissancehomesonline.com Subject: The Hamilton Apartments Z-7500-F Dear Ms. James: I am writing you this letter on behalf of Ison Creek Development, LLC the developers for the Village at Ison Creek residential subdivision. We are opposed to the application for the apartments in Z-7500-F also known as the Hamilton apartments. In short we believe this development is far too dense for the underlying zoning. We have also reviewed the traffic study by Mr. Ernie Peters and fundamentally disagree with the assertions of less traffic during the morning and afternoon peak hours when compared to other uses. Although we were supportive of the last application for this property we are just as adamantly opposed to this application. We believed the commercial usage compatible to our development. We also believe in our experience that commercial traffic is widely dispersed over the working daytime. Apartment traffic is more concentrated, in our opinion, to the peak hours of morning and afternoon. This development would put far too much traffic from a very dense location(the apartments) via the outlet through the shopping center past the dumpster of Buffalo Wild Wings and to the Taylor Loop intersection at Cantrell Road. I am also very concerned about the safety of bicyclist and pedestrians. I am sure the development will indeed by a nice luxury apartment project. It just doesn't belong on this site crammed in against our residential development. The four stories are definitely problematic to us as well as the 41 foot buffer would not adequately shield our view or the noise from the apartments. Too much in one area. The westernmost tract (4.5 acres) should remain zoned R-2. If you have any questions please let me know by email or you can call me at 501-416-8986. Sincerely, Keith A. Wingfield, CGB, CGP P.O. Box 242689 Little Rock, AR 72223 501-416-8986 cell# James, Donna From•_ Lee Littleton <leelittleton@invertelco.com.co> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 9:42 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF Please prevent the rezoning of this parcel. Parcel and land use was previously designated for good reasons and conscientious growth. This proposed rezoning would be inconsistent with planning desires. No one but developer will benefit and places burden on surrounding area. Please deny this re -zoning request. Lee Littleton 7521 Beck Rd LR AR 72223 Sent from my iPhone Z-7500F Hamilton Apartments Dear Commissioners. Please DENY this application. Location —gigantic monolithic, 50-60 feet high building stuffed into the highly congested commercial area at Cantrell and Taylor Loop using a street that wasn't designed for traffic of this volume. It is also immediately adjacent to a PD-R that is already under development. This PD-R will have about 30 homes and will exit over a newly constructed bridge onto Pinnacle Valley Road and not onto Cantrell at Taylor Loop. Size —visualize a structure, War Memorial Stadium for example, that is about 400 feet long, 250 feet wide and 50+ feet high that is squeezed behind one story businesses. It would dwarf the business along the street and visually clutter and constrain the landscape. 250 apartments in one building! One would expect that density in a downtown area not a suburban one, even in a commercial suburban node! R2-single family limited to 6 units per acre; this proposal has 22 units per acre. Traffic Congestion —more than 300 cars per day making 2-5 trips in and out of the intersection as well as along the Cantrell corridor. Safety issues already abound at the traffic signal at Taylor Loop. Imagine what adding those 300+ cars all going into that one drive/"street" will add to that. Driver frustration levels are already high. Zoni —it has been our understanding that undeveloped property along the Highway 10 DOD was to be designated as single family or transitional except at specific commercial nodes. While this application is behind a commercial node, it doesn't fit with the other types of residential areas in the immediate area. As stated above, immediately adjacent to this application a new subdivision is being built that will contain less than 50 homes. How much quality of life or any sense of privacy will the homes along the boundaries of this proposal have? Also, as noted above, this subdivision developers have installed a bridge over Isom Creek so that their traffic will not exit directly onto Cantrell. Need --according to apartrnents.com there are 1,122 available apartments for rent in the City of Little Rock, with approximately 1 /3 of those situated West of I-430 and North of Chenal Parkway. Noting that the Board of Directors recently added a moratorium on large apartment applications in the Bowman Road area until the City can determine the impact and need for such density. Is that what the City wants to begin in this area? As residents of the Westchester neighborhood since 1989 we have been all too aware of the changes surrounding the Cantrell corridor, especially at Taylor Loop. What was in 1989 an area of town that was considered "out in the country" now has one of the busiest, most congested intersections in northwest Little Rock. When we purchased the property to build our home we fully realized that change was going to come....and it certainly has. What we hope for and expect is for our City (Directors, Commissioners, and Staff) to allow of an ordered, thoughtful way of balancing the needs and wants of the residents with those of the developers and businesses that allows for compatible quality of life in nearby residential areas. We ask that you DENY this application. Whether you agree with our viewpoint, we thank you for serving Little Rock. It takes many to keep Little Rock the special city it is. Celia and Gene Martin Kristen Martin 3 Canterbury Court 72223 STARK 5 SECLUDED HILLS COURT LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72223 H: 501-425-1190 W: 501-370-4237 TRACEYBSTARK@GMAIL.COM OR TSTARK@MWLAW.COM June 7, 2017 Little Rock Planning and Development Commission Attn: Ms. Donna James (ddjames 1ittlerock.org) 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Z-750OF: The Hamilton Apartments Long -form PD-R Located Behind 14524 — 14810 Cantrell Road. Dear Planning Commissioners: As a resident of the Secluded Hills neighborhood, I am adamantly opposed to the rezoning of the referenced property to allow for the 4-story apartment complex proposed to be built behind the shopping centers at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. A few of my concerns are as follows: 1. Rezoning from R-2 single-family ("R-2") and PCD planned commercial development ("PCD") to MF 18-24 multi -family ("MF") totally alters the surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. 2. Rezoning from R-2 and PCD to MF totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the North property line thereby reducing the value of those homes before they are even built. 3. Rezoning from R-2 and PCD to MF increases the density of that property from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre. 4. An apartment building of this size, or any building of this size for that matter, is totally out of character and design for this area. The closest 4-story buildings are the Centre at 10 (12921 Cantrell Road) and Family Life Buildings (Ranch Drive and Cantrell). Both of these buildings are situated directly on Cantrell and better in tune with their surrounding like structures and developments. 5. Pursuant to the Proposal it seems there are evidentially serious issues regarding the floodway. 6. Traffic turning into or out of the proposed apartment complex will cause increased traffic congestion and safety issues on the stretch of Cantrell from the entrance of Westbury to Taylor Loop, and most likely beyond. 7. Traffic congestion at the intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell is already a big issue many times a day, including but not limited to, when schools are in session, during rush hours, and during dinner hours. At times it is a virtual standoff in the turn lane between 5474568.1 Little Rock Planning and Development Commission June 7, 2017 people trying to turn into existing shopping centers and the neighborhoods and onto Taylor Loop. Traffic will have an increased gridlock on Cantrell with left turns into the Murphy Gas Station, the two very busy shopping centers on the North side of Cantrell, the proposed apartment complex, and add into the equation traffic from the Secluded Hills, Longlea, Westbury, Westchester and Heatherbrae Subdivisions on the South side of Cantrell. 9. As it is, turning onto Jerry is already a nightmare because of the driveway into the shopping center (Senor Tequila, Main Cheese, Capers, etc.) across from Jerry being in the position it is in. And a left turn onto Shepard from virtual raceway, Taylor Loop, is nearly taking your life into your own hands. 10. Jerry Drive and Shepard Drive are residential streets, not arterial streets, that residents use for walking and bicycling routes, not just access to their homes. Furthermore, using Jerry Drive and Shepard Drive as a "relief' route endangers the residents and effectively lowers the desirability of their homes, i.e. property values, resale, etc. 11. As I read the Proposal, it appears that the existing drive into the shopping center will be moved to align with Jerry. If this is the case, will a traffic light be installed at that intersection? If so, this will create a traffic nightmare similar to that at the Pleasant Ridge Town Center area — too many lights in too short of a distance. If not, it will be a game of Mexican standoff or chicken. 12. The intent of Highway 10 Design Overlay District ("DOD") was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. Unfortunately, the DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. 13. Additionally, according to the Bike Plan of 2011 approved by this very Commission Cantrell Road, Taylor Loop Road, Pinnacle Valley Road, County Farm Road, Jerry Drive and Shepard Drive are a part of the Bike Plan as either a bike path, lane or route and thereby are used regularly by bicyclists. The increased traffic caused by the proposed apartment complex will cause potential danger to the safety of bicyclists. 14. Finally, according to apartments.com, as of this date, there are 1,122 available apartments for rent in the City of Little Rock, with approximately 1/3 of those situated West of I-430 and North of Chenal Parkway. Thereby this questions the real need for another large apartment complex at this time. Please take time before making a final decision to spend some time in a parking lot at this intersection observing the traffic conditions that are currently happening ... the numbers of cars stacked to turn left onto Taylor Loop and Jerry; the number of cars stacked to turn onto Cantrell from Taylor Loop and Jerry; the number of cars turning into and out of the three shopping centers; the number of cars that continue turning left after the lights have turned green for 5474568.1 Little Rock Planning and Development Commission June 7, 2017 oncoming traffic. Schools are out for the summer ... it only gets more congested when they convene in the fall! While I am all for owners of propertyy being able to develop their land, I do believe .that there, is better usage of this land. The current zoning of R-2, single family,. and PCD, planned commercial development, is more than adequate for the property owner to take full advantage of his investment. As you consider your vote on this proposed massive apartment building, please think about what traffic will be in 3, 5 and 10 years. The congestion will only be heavier as the growth of Little Rock continues to move West. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this rezoning. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely; j OL& Tracey B. Stark 5 Secluded Hills Court Little Rock, AR 72223 cc via e-mail: Mr. Craig Berry (caberry1955@ginail.com) Mr. David "Alan" Bubbus (dabubhus@,a,ualr.edu} Ms. Buelah Bynum (laydbeeiayoa mail.com) Mr. Keith Cox (keith.cox@bxs.com} Ms. Janet Dillon (jd cc,wilcompany.com Ms. Rebecca Finney (becks@beckyf nne com) Mr. Scott Hamilton (sdanhl &mail_com) Mr. Troy Laha (lahaengrl�sbcgloba1.net) Mr. Paul Latture (platture@vahoo.com) Mr. Bill May (bniay37@sbcjzlobal.net sbcglobal.net} Mr. Robert Stebbins (robertbstebbinsgatt.net) 5474568.1 James, Donna From: Harold Majors <hmajors@generalproperties.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 3:43 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF PLEASE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION DO NOT APPROVE I am opposed to any development that will add additional congestion to the area of Cantrell and Taylor Loop. This proposed apartment complex will do just that. This is dangerous now and will only be more dangerous with this additional apartment development by Mr. John Rees. I live in this area and all members of my family pass through this intersection on a daily basis. Harold W. Majors 14002 Hinson Road Little Rock, Ar. 72212 James, Donna From: biII.choate@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:41 PM To: James, Donna Subject: oppose Z-750OF RE: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, I (We) OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a massive apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • What about flood plane issues? • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. - According to the Bike Plan of 2011 approved by this Commission Cantrell, Taylor Loop, Pinnacle Valley Road, County Farm Road, Jerry and Shepard are a part of the Bike Plan as either a bike path, lane or route and are thereby used regularly by bicyclists. The increased traffic caused by the proposed apartment complex will cause potential danger to the safety of bicyclists. - Finally, according to apartments.com there are 1,122 available apartments for rent in the City of Little Rock, with approximately 1/3 of those situated West of 1-430 and North of Chenal Parkway. Thereby questioning the real need for another large apartment complex at this time. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please, please, please, Have mercy on the current residents in this area and DENY this application. Bill & Vickie Choate 12620 Pleasant View James, Donna From: msaar824@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:37 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-7500 RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, The Westchester/Heatherbrae Neighborhood OPPOSES the application for this proposal of a massive apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • Are flood plain issues sufficiently addressed? • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Michael B. Saar, President Westchester/Heatherbrae Neighborhood Association 14316 Taylor Loop Road James, Donna From: Judith Cecil <judith_ed@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:37 PM To: James, Donna Subject: 10 Acre TractNo. Of Cantrell & Taylor Loop Zoning to Multi -Family TO: The Little Rock Planning Commission FROM: Edward L. And Judith M. CEcil 5604 Pinnacle Valley Road We want to express our disapproval of the zoning change on the above referenced property. There are multiple issues with the rezoning, not just from us, but neighbors as well. The additional develop would only be adding to an already existing traffic congestion at the intersection of Pinnacle Valley and Cantrell, Taylor Loop and Cantrell and between the two lights you can not get in and out of the shopping centers already in existence without danger, as well as trying to get in and out of the Westbury neighborhood which is also between the 2 stop lights. It is a very dangerous area as it stands today without adding additional problems to the area. There have been several wrecks, We hope there has been a study of the volume of traffic that already exists, as well as the number of accidents. This corridor is getting even more dangerous given the new bicycle path being constructed on Pinnacle Valley where large recreational vehicles and trucks pulling boats, etc. all of whom travel through these intersections. A high density development such as the one proposed for the re -zoning will only make this situation far worse for the Property Owners and the City of Little Rock trying to negotiate emergency vehicles, among other things. Also, we feel this rezoning and property proposal would put way too many people in a concentrated area, especially considering Wingfield Development which is all in the same are. There is additional concern that there is no protection around the proposed multi -family project that would provide any security to us that are existing property owners or to the new property owners currently buying lots to build new homes. We ask that you please express disapproval of the zoning change. Sincerely, Ed and Judith Cecil Sent from my iPad James, Donna From: Kathleen Lafferty -Dudley <redkat12@icloud.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:18 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z7500F. Apartments City Commissioners, This in response to area Z750OF where the committee is considering re --zoning this area behind Fullers & sons to Walgreens. I think this apartment building proposal is a bad mistake for the city of Little Rock & us residents living in this area. Congestion is already at a all time high. Adding these apartments would add to the high congestion area already. Not to mention the property values would be lower and no privacy for the neighbors near by. Please do not let this pass. Please stop this huge apartment building and it's sure to be ugly site. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Gene & Kathleen Dudley 3903 Cameo Dr Little Rock,AR 72212 James, Donna From: Suzanne Kellar McCarty <suzkellar@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 2:49 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Z-750OF RE: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a massive apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. I travel to other cities extensively and know that other cities have planning that takes the surroundings into account and really plan for growth --before a building can get approved, years of study goes into the planning process. We have city planners that are quick to approve new buildings with zoning changes after just a few weeks. While we have city directors on record saying they are not much for "smart growth." I'm so disappointed that our planners are so quick to approve a buildings that a developer wants to stick just about anywhere like this proposed apartment building. Please listed to the residents living in the area! It would be a bad idea for so many reasons: • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 22 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! • Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic We asked you not to allow the mega gas station at this area for this reason. You did it anyway. The traffic has increased dramatically due to this addition. We do not need any additional misguided decisions. Cantrell Road traffic is a nightmare already. Please use some logical thought process. If you cannot, please listed to the people that live in the area. No new multi -family housing in this area! Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times.This area is already an unsafe travel area due to heavy congestion all during the day. Please listed to those that live and work in the area and deny this request! Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues are important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Suzanne McCarty 4218 Carter Lane Little Rock, Ar 72223 Carney, Dana From: Esmeralda Rodriguez <esmetex47@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 1:30 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; dabubbus@uair.edu; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; jd@wilcompany.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net Subject: AGAINST - Rezoning of the site for the Development of The Hamilton Apartments - File No. Z-7500-F To: Little Rock Planning Commission own a home in the Pinnacle Valley Courts subdivision located within a couple of blocks from the proposed rezoning site requested by Rees Commercial. As you well know, the traffic on Cantrell Road and especially on the intersection of Cantrell Road and Taylor Loop are already heavily congested. I'm adamantly opposed the rezoning classification from Single-family to Multi -family as requested by Rees Commercial. I respectfully requested that each and all members of the LR Planning Commission vote against such rezoning. Esmeralda Rodriguez 16 Ison Creek Cove Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Ken Harrison <kenharrisoncpa@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 4:10 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Dawn Prasifka Subject: Z-7500-F Hamilton Apartments Donna, I and my neighbors in the Tulley Cove Neighborhood Association are concerned about the impact of such a large apartment complex as what is proposed by John Rees in file Z-7500-F, known as Hamilton Apartments. While the land under consideration is in a commercial node and has been previously considered for traditional commercial uses, this four story apartment building being proposed introduces a much different use. First, a four story building would be out of character for this area. There are, currently, no structures in the area taller than two stories. The office building at Sam Peck and Cantrell is, currently, the tallest west of Rodney Parham and Cantrell Roads. While apartments might be a suitable use of Mr. Rees' land, a four story building would not be. Secondly, a complex of the size proposed by Mr. Rees would create an intensity for this area that would be problematic for traffic at the already troublesome intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell Roads. Additionally, there is concern regarding the impact of drainage in the event such a footprint of building and parking lot was created. This impacts already problematic draining conditions to the west and on the north side of Cantrell Road. Will you send me either the Planning and Development staff s comments on this proposal or the link to that? Thank you. Ken Harrison 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Home phone: 501-868-8188 Cell phone: 501-804-8311 James, Donna From: Shearon, Hanna C <HCShearon@uams.edu> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:39 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Request Z-7500-F To Whom It May Concern, It has come to my attention that a proposal for apartments has been submitted. As a resident of that area, I am opposed to this for many reasons. First, there are already five apartment complexes within a few miles of this area. The closest, Highland Pointe Apartments, already has 248 units less than one mile away from the proposed location. The traffic on Hwy 10/Cantrell is a significant problem already, and it will continue to be with more development to this area, Many people bypass Cantrell Rd by passing through Sam Peck and Pleasant Forest. Of those, many speed through our neighborhood and make it unsafe for us to walk our pets or have our children play outside. With the addition of families, this could also burden the local schools. Don Roberts is a highly sought after school, and it was one of our main considerations when moving to this area. A former neighbor recently told me they cannot honor school choice for that area as it is currently full with those living in this district. Lastly, development of this and surrounding areas is negatively impacting the wildlife in this area. We now face an issue of displaced foxes and coyotes looking for food and shelter. It seems like the city is more interested in protecting the interests of large developers vs the residents of these well - established neighborhoods. I am unable to make it to the June meeting when this proposal is being discussed. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Hanna Shearon Resident, 13304 White Fir Lane Little Rock, AR 72212 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. James, Donna From: Grey Williams <wgreywilliams@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:27 PM To: Ken Harrison Cc: James, Donna; Mickey Thomas; Celia Martin; Dawn Prasifka Subject: Re: Objection to Z-5817-1 In addition to the above, the already -difficult left turn out of Rummel would be made more dangerous by the addition of significant traffic turning left from Cantrell entering 15000, left exiting 15000, and right onto Cantrell from 15000 from a drive -through restaurant, which is likely to be busiest when rush hour traffic is already making that a nerve-wracking intersection. That intersection serves a large number of homes that have no other outlet onto Cantrell. Office would have a much less traffic -intensive impact, especially during rush hour. Thanks, Grey Williams Thomas Park On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Ken Harrison <kenharrisonc a hotmail.com> wrote: Donna, I appreciate the info you provided about the proposed restaurant at 15000 Cantrell Road. My good neighbor, Celia, said it well. We, in Tulley Cove, oppose this proposed rezoning. Again, we are interested in protecting this area west of the Regions branch for more appropriate development for such a transition area. What is being proposed would move the zoning of that partial of land from R-2 to PD-C. As you know from our interactions on the planned surgery center on the lot to the west, we would not object to a POD rezoning for a less intense office development. This restaurant proposal is an attempt to let the commercial node at Taylor Loop Road and Cantrell Road creep further west. Such creep will lead to the decline of the area, much like what we've seen happen on Rodney Parham over the past years. Additionally, I can think of at least these other reasons to oppose this plan: • too much traffic • too much noise • additional traffic hazards from left turns onto Cantrell from the restaurant • too much paved parking, adding to the already existing drainage issues affecting Taylor Loop Creek and our private bridge and street on Tulley Cove • too much lighting • too much noisy activity during evening and night hours Such an intense commercial development would be a nuisance and an eyesore for existing nearby residential neighborhoods. Therefore, I encourage you to recommend denial of this rezoning request. Please let me know as you learn more about this proposal. Thank you. Ken Harrison 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Home phone: 501-868-8188. Cell phone: 501-804-8311 From: Celia Martin <thecook7@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 12:54 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Ken Harrison; Grey Williams; Mickey Thomas Subject: Re: Information re: Z-5817-1 Thank, Donna. That's what I thought, and was afraid of. So if it's basically the same plan but with a "pick up" window instead of a drive through window, is the thinking that it reduces the traffic issues enough to be ok? It's still a commercial, high traffic business in an area that has been designated to be suburban office. As far as Westchester is concerned, it's not an appropriate use for that space. A free-standing restaurant is a heavy commercial use. Once again it would be jumping over a lesser use zoning and would open up everything to Rummel Road for commercial uses. Speaking of west of Regions, what is happening with the surgery/dr office? We appreciate all your insight. Celia M On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:39 AM, James, Donna <DJames@littlerock.gov> wrote: The site plan is very similar to the plan which was submitted a year or so ago minus the office building in the back. The applicant is the same, Pete Hornibrook of Rector Phillips Morris. Once our graphic person has a reduced version of the site plan I will forward. Celia this is the lot that is currently zoned R-2, Single-family, the lot adjacent to Regions Bank (east) and the approved POD for the doctor's office, the surgery center (west). Ken the 2 letters of support from Cloud Family Dentistry and Little Rock Surgery indicate support for a Zaxby's restaurant. (The applicant did not include the name of the restaurant in their application.) From: Ken Harrison lmailto:kenharrisoncga@hotmaii.comj Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:31 PM To: James, Donna <DJames@littlerock.eov> Cc: Celia Martin <thecook7@att.net>; Grey Williams <Mrevwilliams@gmail.com>; Mickey Thomas <rn ickey-tho m as@ att. net> Subject: Information re: Z-5817-1 Hi, Donna! I received the Planning Commission hearing notice, for a rezoning at 15000 Cantrell Road for a "restaurant with a pick-up window", yesterday. That plan disturbs me. As we've discussed in the past, the land in that transition area on Cantrell Road is inappropriate for such a development. Can you provide me with additional information on these plans? The description in the notice makes this restaurant sound like something less than an upscale restaurant. While I think any type of restaurant is inappropriate for this area, something with a "pick-up window" sounds particularly bad. Again, I and my neighbors would find more favor in a plan for an quiet professional office development on this land, which would be much less intrusive into the neighboring residential areas. Thank you for sharing any information you can about this latest proposal. Ken Harrison 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Home phone: 501-868-8188 Cell phone: 501-804-8311 James, Donna From: Ken Harrison <kenharrisoncpa@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 6:08 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Grey Williams; Mickey Thomas; Celia Martin; Dawn Prasifka Subject: Objection to Z-5817-1 Donna, I appreciate the info you provided about the proposed restaurant at 15000 Cantrell Road. My good neighbor, Celia, said it well. We, in Tulley Cove, oppose this proposed rezoning. Again, we are interested in protecting this area west of the Regions branch for more appropriate development for such a transition area. What is being proposed would move the zoning of that partial of land from R-2 to PD-C. As you know from our interactions on the planned surgery center on the lot to the west, we would not object to a POD rezoning for a less intense office development. This restaurant proposal is an attempt to let the commercial node at Taylor Loop Road and Cantrell Road creep further west. Such creep will lead to the decline of the area, much like what we've seen happen on Rodney Parham over the past years. Additionally, I can think of at least these other reasons to oppose this plan: • too much traffic • too much noise • additional traffic hazards from left turns onto Cantrell from the restaurant • too much paved parking, adding to the already existing drainage issues affecting Taylor Loop Creek and our private bridge and street on Tulley Cove ■ too much lighting • too much noisy activity during evening and night hours Such an intense commercial development would be a nuisance and an eyesore for existing nearby residential neighborhoods. Therefore, I encourage you to recommend denial of this rezoning request. Please let me know as you learn more about this proposal. Thank you. Ken Harrison 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Home phone: 501-868-8188 Cell phone: 501-804-8311 From: Celia Martin <thecook7@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 12:54 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Ken Harrison; Grey Williams; Mickey Thomas Subject: Re: Information re: Z-5817-1 Thank, Donna. That's what I thought, and was afraid of. So if it's basically the same plan but with a "pick up" window instead of a drive through window, is the thinking that it reduces the traffic issues enough to be ok? It's still a commercial, high traffic business in an area that has been designated to be suburban office. As far as Westchester is concerned, it's not an appropriate use for that space. A free-standing restaurant is a heavy commercial use. Once again it would be jumping over a lesser use zoning and would open up everything to Rummel Road for commercial uses. Speaking of west of Regions, what is happening with the surgery/dr office? We appreciate all your insight. Celia M On Jun 21, 2017, at 7:39 AM, James, Donna <DJamesf7ae.littlerock. oov> wrote; The site plan is very similar to the plan which was submitted a year or so ago minus the office building in the back. The applicant is the same, Pete Hornibrook of Rector Phillips Morris. Once our graphic person has a reduced version of the site plan I will forward. Celia this is the lot that is currently zoned R-2, Single-family, the lot adjacent to Regions Bank (east) and the approved POD for the doctor's office, the surgery center (west). Ken the 2 letters of support from Cloud Family Dentistry and Little Rock Surgery indicate support for a Zaxby's restaurant. (The applicant did not include the name of the restaurant in their application.) From: Ken Harrison [mailto:kenharrisoncpa@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 4:31 PM To: James, Donna <DJames@littlerock.pov> Cc: Celia Martin <thecook7@att.net>; Grey Williams <wgreywilliams@gmail.cor-n>; Mickey Thomas <m ickev-tho m a s@ att. net> Subject: Information re: Z-5817-1 Hi, Donna! I received the Planning Commission hearing notice, for a rezoning at 15000 Cantrell Road for a "restaurant with a pick-up window", yesterday. That plan disturbs me. As we've discussed in the past, the land in that transition area on Cantrell Road is inappropriate for such a development. Can you provide me with additional information on these plans? The description in the notice makes this restaurant sound like something less than an upscale restaurant. While I think any type of restaurant is inappropriate for this area, something with a "pick-up window" sounds particularly bad. Again, I and my neighbors would find more favor in a plan for an quiet professional office development on this land, which would be much less intrusive into the neighboring residential areas. Thank you for sharing any information you can about this latest proposal. Ken Harrison 5504 Tulley Cove Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Home phone: 501-868-8188 Cell phone: 501-804-8311 amen, Donna rom: -ent: o: lubject: cello, Lee Littleton <leelittleton@aviss.net> Thursday, July 20, 2017 2:54 PM James, Donna # Z-7500-F Ay name is Lee Littleton. I live at 7521 Beck Rd, LR 72223. am very much opposed to the rezoning of the property related to the subject line of this ,mail. Fhe Hwy 10 corridor development plan is in place and is a great design with appropriate ransition from commercial to residential. Fhe parcel requesting rezoning approval is zoned residential and should stay that way to naintain the transition from commercial to residential in an orderly way. there are many other viable sites for a multi -family development that do not require rezoning ind the developer of this site should seek ownership of an alternate and correctly zoned site 'or a cult -family development. please consider the current zoning as the zoning of choice and remember that the current zoning was not created with out great thought and consideration. really appreciate you reading this email and I urge you and all others of your department to )ppose this rezoning. vith kind regards, -ee Littleton 1.281.668.4653 James, Donna From: Emily Russ <emilyarussbookkeeper@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 1:53 PM To: James, Donna Subject: we are CHILDREN!!!! RE: Z-7500F Planning Commissioners, We are LITTLE CHILDREN (ages 6, 5, and 2) Eliza, Jon, and Charlie Russ. We OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. This new complex would create so much more traffic in our neighborhood. We like to ride our bikes, go for walks to our friends houses, and play outside. A GIANT new complex will make our neighborhood UNSAFE with too much traffic. ESPECIALLY the intersection of Taylor Loop and Cantrell, which is already a VERY CONGESTED intersection. Please DO NOT ALLOW a new huge complex to be built, we need a safe place to grow up!!! 3 children, Eliza, Jon, and Charlie Russ 15 Westchester Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Ryan Russ <ryanmruss@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 1:43 PM To: James, Donna Subject: Fwd: OPPOSE apartment complex in our community!!!! RE: Z-750OF Planning Commissioners, I OPPOSE the application for this proposal of a huge 4 story apartment building behind Buffalo Wild Wings at Cantrell and Taylor Loop. • Rezoning from R2 single-family to MF 18-24 multi -family totally alters surrounding area, especially abutting approved residential developments and businesses alike. • Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 totally dwarfs the single-family development that has been approved along the north property line reducing the value of those homes ■ Rezoning from R2 to MF 18-24 increases the density of that area from up to 6 units per acre to 23 units per acre for this proposal. • This is a massive single apartment building, not even an apartment complex that tries to fit into a surrounding residential neighborhood. The size is more comparable and compatible with a large office building or educational institution. Why is it being crammed into this small area? • 4 story, 50-60 feet above grade. Nothing in the area is this tall. Will dwarf the surrounding homes and busineses. • FLOODING. What about flood plane issues —flooding into the Fuller Hardware shopping center. Flooding and erosion of property across Isom Creek. Flooding of Pinnacle Valley Road twice this year already. • TRAFFIC CONGESTION. Rezoning to MF18-24 at this location will only further increase the patterns and congestion at Taylor Loop and Cantrell. SAFETY issues! . Rezoning to MF 18-24 will add significantly to the already frustrating traffic congestion on Cantrell, especially eastward. Adding 300-400 cars all coming and going from this one location will greatly exacerbate the situation, especially during peak travel times. Although the entire area of this application may not fall within the Highway 10 DOD, the intent of the DOD was to allow for orderly and planned development that would keep the beauty and flavor of the countryside as you left the bustle of the city and transitioned into the suburban areas and country. The DOD hasn't lived up to those expectations. Approving this application will only add to those dwindling expectations. If quality of life issues is important in planning for a vibrant Little Rock, please DENY this application. Thoughtfully, Emily and Ryan Russ 15 Westchester Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 Ryan Russ, LPC James, Donna From: Tracey Stark <tstark@mwlaw.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 3:59 PM To: James, Donna Cc: caberry1955@gmail.com; dabubbus@ualr.edu; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; jd@wilcompany.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net Subject: Z-750OF: The Hamilton Apartments Long -form PD-R Attachments: Letter to Planning Commision - re Z-7500F.pdf Ms. James, I have attached a letter in opposition to the referenced rezoning matter to be placed in the Commissioners' packets before the Planning Commission meeting tomorrow. Additionally, I have cc'd the commissioners for their consideration before the meeting. If you have any questions or problems opening the attachment, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Tracey B. Stark Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission and any attachment may constitute an attomey-client communication that is privileged at law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail or by calling (501) 688-8800 Little Rock, AR (479) 464-5650 Rogers, AR (512) 480-5100 Austin, TX (267) 757-8780 Newtown, PA or (870) 336-9292 Jonesboro, AR so that our address record can be corrected. James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:27 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Oppose Z-7500-F Hamilton Apartments rezoning From: Frances Fendler [mailto:frances.fendler@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:24 AM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; laydbeejay@gmail.com; jd@wilcompany.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; dabubbus@ualr.edu; keith.cox@bxs.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net; Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov>; platture@yahoo.com Subject: Oppose Z-7500-F Hamilton Apartments rezoning Dear Commissioners, I ask that you deny the rezoning of the Cantrell/Taylor Loop area to permit the Hamilton Apartments to be built. The traffic situation here is awful and if those apartments are built, it will get a lot worse. I live in the immediate neighborhood and go through that intersection daily. It is very dangerous now, and accidents are frequent. The large Murphy Oil gas station that was built a couple of years ago really made a bad situation worse. The stretch of Cantrell from Pinnacle Valley Road to Taylor Loop is a nightmare, with cars weaving in and out, dodging each other in the center turn lane, unable to turn into the existing shopping centers and feeder roads. When I'm going west on Cantrell, I frequently can't even get into the left turn lane to get onto Taylor Loop, because it's full. I have to turn right into the Walgreen's/Buffalo Wild Wing's shopping center, turn around, and then wait at the stop light to go south through the intersection onto Taylor Loop. (After 3:00, 1 don't even attempt to use Cantrell when I have to go downtown for work. I take Pleasant Forest and Pleasant Valley Blvd - - that means I'm forced to commute through neighborhoods that were never designed as primary commuting routes.) My neighbor, Peggy Wells, has written you a long and very thoughtful letter opposing this rezoning. I endorse everything she said. I understand that this area of west Little Rock is going to continue to be developed. But the development needs to be done in accordance with a plan to make sure that the roads as well as other infrastructure can handle the increased burdens. If it isn't, the city will have endangered the safety of people who live in and/or commute through this area. I am sorry that I cannot attend the meeting this afternoon. I hope you will take my opinion into account. Respectfully yours, Frances Fendler 14611 Honey Bear Drive, Little Rock James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:30 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Z-7500-F From: Bob Craig [mailto:bobcraig828@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:30 AM To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Subject: Z-7500-F Dear Commissioner, Please deny Z-7500-F As homeowners in the immediate area, we see approval as a violation of trust placed in the hands of Little Rock planners when deciding to purchase our homes. Respectfully, Robert Craig President Westbury Neighborhood Association 9 Westchase Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 501-690-3700 James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:22 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Opposition to zoning change for Hamilton apartments From: Robert Hughes [mailto:rhughes@aristotle.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 11:19 AM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; dabubbus@ualr.edu; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; jd@wilcompany.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net; Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Subject: Opposition to zoning change for Hamilton apartments I recently purchased a home on Garden Valley Loop. I am very opposed to the zoning change proposed to allow construction of a large apartment complex north of the intersection of Taylor Loop Road and Cantrell Rd. I urge you to vote against rezoning this property parcel from single-family residential to multi -family residential units. Robert Hughes 302 Garden Valley Loop Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:28 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: opposed to Rezoning From: Mary A [mailto:maryanne.wild@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:13 AM To: caberryl955@gmail.com; dabubbus@ualr.edu; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; 'd@wilcompany.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; robertbstebbins@att.net; Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Subject: opposed to Rezoning I am writing to document my opposition to the proposed rezoning of a parcel of land north of the intersection of West Cantrell and Taylor Loop (Planning Commission File # Z-7500-F). The land is currently zoned for single-family residential. The proposal is to rezone the land for multi -family residential to allow for construction of The Hamilton Apartments, a 250 unit apartment complex. I oppose this rezoning for the reasons listed below. Current Highway 10 Plan — The Highway 10 Corridor plan has long documented the zoning for this land as single-family residential. The land is well suited for single family residential development, it is not well suited for a high density, multi -family apartment complex (see reasons documented in the following sections below). Construction of the proposed apartments would result in abandonment of a long standing and well thought out plan, in favor of non -planned development. Additionally, rezoning would reduce the availability of single-family residential development areas in a highly desirable location. As an example, The Village at Ison Creek is currently being developed for single-family residential on the property next to the property documented in Z-7500-F. Let's use the land in a manner that is part of a plan and not make up piecemeal changes on the fly. Traffic — I drive through the intersection of Cantrell and Taylor loop multiple times daily. Traffic is already a nightmare along this section of Cantrell, especially during morning and afternoon rush hours. Adding the traffic from 250 households to the already overloaded intersection will negatively impact traffic flow and increase the risk of more accidents. This is already a dangerous intersection. Infrastructure — Assuming that the water, sewage, drainage, and roadway systems for the Cantrell corridor were designed according to a plan, that plan would be the Highway 10 Corridor plan. That plan would be based on the land in question being used for single-family residential. The impact of adding 250 households to the surrounding water and sewage systems could result in the need to retrofit those systems to handle the additional, unplanned load. Typically, these types of retrofits are not addressed until after a critical problem develops and has to be addressed in an expedited (and expensive) manner. As for drainage, there are already flooding problems in the area of the proposed construction and the neighboring Ison Creek and Pinnacle Valley Road areas. Covering the land which is currently dirt and vegetation with concrete will only increase those problems. Retrofits are very expensive. Un In Summary — Rees Commercial has stated that the Hamilton Apartments are "progress," and we all should be in favor of "progress." I am in favor of "progress," but just throwing up an apartment complex in an area where one does not belong does not fit my definition of "progress." My definition of "progress" includes developing something that is in harmony with the existing environment, that does not negatively impact the existing environment, and that fits in with a documented plan. The proposed rezoning in Z-7500-F is not "progress." I urge you to vote against rezoning this property parcel from single-family residential to multi -family residential units. Mary Anne Wildman, MS PT, RYT-200 16 Highlander Drive James, Donna From: Carney, Dana Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:00 PM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: zoning laws From: Collins, Gilbert Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 2:03 PM To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Subject: FW: zoning laws FYI From: Mac&Liz Faulkner [«iailto:maclizfaulkner mail.comj Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 12:59 PM To: Craig Berry <caberr 1955 maiLcom>; la dbeeia mail.com; keith.cox bxs.com; idCa7wilcompany.com; beck beck finne .com; Scott Hamilton <sdanh1 _ grnail.com>; lahaen rls sbc lobal.net; latture ahoo.com; bma 37 sbc lobal.net; Robert Stebbins <robertbstebbins att.net>; Hendrix, Erma <ehendrix@littlerock.gov_>; dabubbus ualr.edu; boardrevised@littlerock.gov; Vice Mayor Webb <kath webb14 mail.com>; Director Peck <ca i222 sbc lobal.net>; Director Hines <lancehines me.com>; Director Adcock <d'adcock comcast.net>; Collins, Gilbert < collins little rock. ov> Cc: Bill * Morrison <Ratbikeion ahoo.com>; cc: Nicholas Alsop < innaclevaIIe mail.com>; Keith Wingfield <keith riverrockbuilders.>; alexis.ware@att.net; aste ka ste kaandassociates.com; aheid21688 mail.com; Ann * Morris <amorris901@yahoo.com>; Barbara Lee <barbara.1ee17@Ilve.com>; bilLbaile bnbsinc.com; Tramell, Bob&Kim <tramel@earthlink.net>; Celia Martin <thecook7 att.net>; Polat, Ozlem <opo late Iittlerock.gov>; Celeste Connor <connorceleste mail.com>; DK ROBINSON <robinson427 Osbcgloba1.net>; Darlene Harrison <okleer hotmail.com>; Dawn Prasifka <dawn rasifka sbc lobal.net>; dell cantrelldru .com; Sissi Brandon <sbrandon501@att.net>; Esmeralda Rodriguez (esmetex47@att.net) <Esmetex47 att.net>; Libby Sheard <Ibsheard@sbcglobal.net>; Grey Williams <w re williams mail.com>; Jessica Coker <'lcok.0203 mail.com>; Jim Jenkins <iim0enkins7031 mail.com>; krmnw@comcast.net; ksigreen _ sbcglobal.net; Kasey Andis <kase andis mail.com>; Kathy Holt <kloholtl mail.com>; lynn brock <kenbcbt@yahoo.com>; Ken Harrison <kenharrisonc a hotmail.com>; ima'ors n mail.com; leste ka aol.com; kris littleton <leelittleton aviss.net>; Lois Cox <ioisicox10@gmail.com>; Lynn McCarley <Iynnandkids@sbcglobal.net>; Mac&Liz Faulkner <maclizfaulkner mail.cam>; micke-thomas att.net; mindymorrell@hotmail.com; m Morrell <tenis99 hotmail.com>; ncfom comcast.net; ar icioud.com; Patrick Andis <patrick.andis@gmail.corrt>; Peggy Wells <yeetwells 1508@ comcast. net>; Phillip Cox < cox mscox.com>; Dick Stoker <rfstokerC@earthlink.net>; Robert Craig <bobcrai 828mail.com>; Scollet, Madelon <teliacs _ aol.com>; Ponnappan, Subramaniam <mani onna an comcast.net>; tomm oad sbc lobal.net; T Williams <ton uawilliams mail.com>; Tony DiCarlo <dicarlo amhfirm.com>; Vicky Williams <Vick wri htwi Ilia ms@grnail.com>; Nich Cossey <Incossey@gmaii.co_m>; Jamie Wetherington <'cweth4766 att.net>; mlc chapPyahoo.com Subject: zoning laws It wold seem to me that the issue of rezoning causes such a large impact on so many people in the City, that it should become a political issue and be addressed in the next elections. It seems like we have "fake" zoning now. Neighborhood opinions are important and don't seem to be heard by elected officials. In my opinion, the zoning laws should be revised so that it is extremely difficult to change them because so much infrastructure and especially citizen's plans are based on the existing zoning. James, Donna From: Collins, Gilbert Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 7:44 AM To: Carney, Dana; James, Donna Subject: FW: Top 6 reasons to deny zoning change for the proposed Hamilton Apts From: Lee Majors [mailto:lee. majors9@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 9:52 PM To: caberryl955@gmail.com; laydbeejay@gmail.com; keith.cox@bxs.com; jd@wilcompany.com; becky@beckyfinney.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; lahaengrls@sbcglobal.net; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcgloba1.net; robertbstebbins@att.net; Hendrix, Erma <ehendrix@littlerock.gov>; dabubbus@ualr.edu; boardrevised@littlerock.gov; Vice Mayor Webb <kathywebb14@gmail.com>; Director Peck <capi222@sbcglobal.net>; Director Hines <lancehines@me.com>; Director Adcock <djadcock@comcast.net>; Collins, Gilbert <gcollins@littlerock.gov> Subject: Top 6 reasons to deny zoning change for the proposed Hamilton Apts 6. Single family housing neighborhoods in close proximity to the site were built while the current zoning was in place, and have counted on the integrity of the Hwy 10 Corridor plan in deciding to make a home in the area. Rezoning is a slap in the face to those who made decisions about where they live and trusted that zoning actually means something. 5. There is nothing wrong with apartments or people who reside in them, but they typically aren't there long term. Single family home neighborhoods by nature provide longer term stability in an area because residents are invested for a much longer term. I don't think this can be disputed in a legitimate way. A complex of this scale is a negative pressure on the area. 4. The owner of the property has been forthright that he bought this property for too much as it is currently zoned. Was the assumption that he could roll the zoning commission? This would be a ridiculous argument to have it rezoned, but it is one of his arguments. 3. The owner of the property may have decent intentions, but this is an investment property. If this is a first venture into this type of property for him, what are the chances he wants out and sells? He could sell to anybody, who likely will not have the same regard for the area. A reasonable person could suspect the plan is to build the complex to sell it. Nothing wrong with that in a business sense, except that he is lobbying for a zoning change that will negatively affect residents in the area in the ways below. 2. There is already existing traffic congestion in the area. The owner claims there is negligible impact based on an average flow out of the complex. This is misleading, since the outlet from the complex is through a traffic light, which will release surges of traffic into an already congested area that has three traffic lights in a '/ - 113 mile section. Another section of Hwy 10 like the Pleasant Ridge section will result. Would it be a negligible impact on traffic if something like this was built across from Pleasant Ridge shopping center? Of course not, and it isn't negligible at the proposed site, either. 1. There are already existing problems with drainage. This is not an imaginary problem. The owner makes claims of retention provisions to address drainage, but there is no way his claimed provisions can prevent increased drainage problems for residents in the area of the property. What are the ramifications to the owner when this happens? Can he be sued because he was wrong? I assume the answer is no, and the problems this creates will fall on the backs of us who are asking you to stop this. Please seriously consider the genuine issues for the residents around this proposed zoning change. Sincerely, Lee Majors 7 Thomas Park Circle