HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8927 Staff AnalysisJUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A
File No.: Z-8927
Owner: Peartree, Inc.
Applicant: Robert Tucker
Address: 3604/3612/3700 Kavanaugh Blvd.
Description: Northeast Corner of Kavanaugh Blvd. and North Lookout Road
Zoned: C-3
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the parking provisions of Section 36-
502 and 36-507 to allow a reduced number of parking spaces for a restaurant use and for
more than twenty-five (25) percent of the required parking to be located off -site.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Vacant Building, Office and Plant Nursery
Proposed Use of Property: Restaurant, Office and Plant Nursery
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
• At the time of building permit, provide a drainage plan and information as to the
adequacy of the downstream drainage system. If the site increases stormwater
so that the downstream drainage system is not adequate, then stormwater
detention will apply.
• At the time of building permit, a retaining wall certification is required if the wall is
greater than four feet in height.
B. Landscape and Buffer Issues:
1. Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance
requirements.
2. A land use buffer will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar
use of a more restrictive nature. As a component of all land use buffer
requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum
of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the
buffer. A minimum of seventy (70) percent of the land use buffer shall be
undisturbed. Easements cannot count toward fulfilling this requirement. The
plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape
ordinance of the city, section 15-81.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.
A portion of the property to the east is zoned R5 therefore, a minimum nine
(9) foot wide buffer is required along the east property line. The property is
located
in the City's designated mature area. A 25% reduction of the buffer
requirements is acceptable.
3. All new and existing plant materials shall be in good condition at completion
of project. Replace any damaged or dead material.
4. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area
that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. One (1) tree
and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet
of perimeter planting strip.
5. The parking area shall be screened from the adjacent right-of-way.
6. One (1) tree shall be provided for each twelve (12) parking spaces in the
interior of the parking area. Existing trees and vegetation can be used to
satisfy these requirements.
7. An irrigation system shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or
larger.
8. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing
trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or
larger.
C. Staff Analysis:
The C-3 zoned property at 3604 Kavanaugh Blvd. is occupied by a one-story
commercial building. The property is located at the northeast corner of Kavanaugh
Blvd. and N. Lookout Road. The building is comprised of 3,160 square feet of floor
area. The owner of this property also owns the property at 3612/3700 Kavanaugh
(one tract) which is also zoned C-3 and is occupied by Hocott's Garden Center and
a small office building (2,170 square feet). There is a small area of parking behind
the building at 3604 Kavanaugh and some on -street parking. A small parking area
containing five (5) parking spaces is located behind the Hocott's building, with
seven (7) head -in parking spaces located in front of the small office building
(partially in the right-of-way). Access drives from N. Lookout Road serve the
building at 3604 Kavanaugh and the Hocott's property. The two (2) buildings
(3608 and 3610 Kavanaugh Blvd.) between the building at 3604 Kavanaugh and
the Hocott's property have separate ownership(s).
The applicant is proposing to occupy the building at 3604 Kavanaugh Blvd. with a
new restaurant use. As part of the project the parking area behind the building will
be improved with new paving (3 spaces). A new parking area will be constructed
on the Hocott's property, as noted on the attached site plan. The new parking area
will contain 32 paved parking spaces, with an access drive from Kavanaugh Blvd.
The existing head -in parking spaces in front of the small office building will be
removed and replaced by three (3) parallel on -street spaces.
The commercial building at 3604 Kavanaugh has a nonconforming status related
to parking. The building has a history of commercial use which requires ten (10)
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A ICON'T.
off-street parking spaces. Parking for three (3) vehicles exists behind the building,
leaving a shortage of seven (7) spaces. Section 36-502(b)(3)c. of the City's
Zoning Ordinance requires 31 off-street parking spaces for a 3,160 square foot
restaurant. With credit given for the existing nonconforming status, the proposed
new restaurant will require 21 additional off-street parking spaces. Section 36-
507(a) allows up to 25 percent of the total parking requirement to be located off -
site, with 300 feet of the use they serve. As noted above, a new 32 space parking
lot will be constructed on the Hocott's Garden Center property. The Hocotts
Garden Center and small office building require 15 off-street parking spaces. This
leaves 17 spaces which can be devoted to the new restaurant use, for a total
shortage of four (4) spaces. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances to
allow a reduced number of parking spaces and for more than 25 percent of parking
requirement to be located off -site.
Staff is supportive of the requested parking variances. Staff views the request as
reasonable. Parking variances have been granted in the past for restaurants
(occupying existing commercial buildings) along Kavanaugh Blvd. from N.
University Avenue (Heights) to Walnut Street (Hillcrest). The applicant's proposal
leaves a shortfall of only four (4) parking spaces. This does not include the fact
that on -street parking does exist along Kavanaugh Blvd. Also, when the restaurant
is open during evening hours, the small office building and the Hocott's Garden
Center will be closed, leaving more parking available for the restaurant. It is also
important to note that the Hillcrest Design Overlay District boundaries are located
across N. Lookout Road to the south and across Kavanaugh Blvd. to the west.
The Hillcrest DOD requires one-half of the typical parking requirement. If this site
were located within the Hillcrest DOD, there would be no variance for an overall
shortage of parking spaces. Staff believes the applicant's request to occupy the
building at 3604 Kavanaugh Blvd as a restaurant, and the proposed parking plan
for the overall property ownership is reasonable and should have no adverse
impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
D. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested parking variance, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Compliance with the Public Works requirements as noted in paragraph A. of
the staff report.
2. Compliance with the Landscape and Buffer requirements as noted in
paragraph B. of the staff report.
3. Signage must be provided directing restaurant patrons to the new parking
area.
4. The parking variances are contingent upon the two (2) properties (3604 and
3612/3700 Kavanaugh Blvd.) maintaining the same ownership. If the
ownership is ever split, the parking issue must be brought back before the
Board of Adjustment for review.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.)
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
(March 31, 2014)
Robert Tucker and David Hamilton were present, representing the application. There
were six (6) objectors present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation
of approval.
Robert Tucker addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained the
parking plan for the project. He noted that the Hillcrest DOD was located immediately to
the south and west and required one-half the typical required parking. He explained
that the new parking area would benefit the area.
Regina Smith, owner of So restaurant, addressed the Board in opposition. She
discussed on -street parking in the immediate area. She noted that her restaurant had
valet parking. She presented a petition of opposition to the Board.
Chris Stonecipher, employee of So restaurant, also spoke in opposition. He noted
safety concerns with restaurant patrons crossing the street at this location.
Kyle Pounders, employee of So restaurant, also spoke in opposition. He concurred with
two (2) previous speakers.
Bo Hawk, owner of the property across Kavanaugh to the west, also spoke in
opposition. He explained that So restaurant uses his parking lot after hours. He stated
that patrons of the proposed new restaurant would park in his lot.
Spencer English, employee of So restaurant, also spoke in opposition. He noted traffic
issues in the area.
Mary Anderson, employees of So restaurant, also spoke in opposition. She also noted
traffic and parking concerns.
Mr. Tucker explained that the seven (7) lead-in parking spaces in front of the small
office building would be replaced with parallel spaces which will conform to City code.
He noted that So restaurant had no off-street parking spaces during the day and one-
half the required parking after hours.
Rajesh Mehta asked Mr. Tucker if valet parking could be utilized for the new restaurant.
Mr. Tucker noted that it would be up to the new restaurant owner.
The distance between the new restaurant building and the new parking area was
discussed. There was a brief discussion between the Board and staff regarding the
parking requirements and off -site parking allowances. The issue was discussed further.
Chairman Yates noted that he could not support the application.
Rajesh Mehta noted that he could not support the application without valet parking.
Mr. Tucker asked to defer the application to the April 28 agenda, so that the restaurant
owner could be present to address the valet parking issue and neighbor concerns.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A CON'T.
There was a motion to defer the application to the April 28, 2014 agenda. The motion
passed by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays 0 absent and 1 abstention (Smith). The application
was deferred.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (April 28, 2014)
The applicant was not present. Staff informed the Board that the applicant had
requested deferral of the application to the May 19, 2014 agenda, as the property owner
could not be present at this meeting. Staff supported the deferral request.
Bo Hawk addressed the Board and objected to the deferral request. The issue of
deferral was discussed.
Jerry Sears also addressed the Board, objecting to the deferral request.
Jan Bowman also spoke in opposition to the deferral request.
There was motion to defer the application to the May 19, 2014 agenda. The motion was
passed by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays, 0 absent and 1 abstention (Smith). The application
was deferred.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (May 19, 2014)
Chris Travis, Robert Tucker and others were present, representing the application.
There were several persons present in opposition and several persons present in
support. Staff presented the application, noting that the application had been revised by
the applicant. Staff noted that the number of parking spaces in the new proposed lot
had been increased from 27 to 31. Staff noted that with the increase in spaces, the
variance for total number of spaces had been eliminated. Staff noted that the overall
number of spaces, as revised, conformed to ordinance standards. Staff noted that the
only remaining variance was to have more than 25 percent of the required parking being
located off site.
Chris Travis addressed the Board in support of the application. He noted that there
were a number of other businesses in the area with deficient parking. He explained that
approval of the parking variance would solve the parking issues for three (3) of the
buildings (3604, 3612 and 3700 Kavanaugh) in the area. He briefly discussed the
number of parking spaces currently on the site.
Rajesh Mehta asked if the restaurant would have valet parking. Mr. Travis explained
that valet parking would not be necessary because they are providing the required
parking.
Jim Mauney, of Hocatt's Garden Center, spoke in support. He explained that the new
parking area would benefit his business as well as the proposed restaurant.
Mark Abernathy addressed the Board. He referred to a previous court case, and noted
that the property had a hardship based on the case.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A CON'T.
Jacy Daugherty addressed the Board in support of the applicant. He noted that he was
a tenant of 3700 Kavanaugh Blvd. He noted that the new parking lot would benefit his
business and create safer parking in the area.
Timothy O'Brien spoke in opposition. He stated that he provided valet parking for So
restaurant. He stated that the proposed new parking lot would not solve the parking
problem in the area.
David Vandergriff, attorney for So restaurant, also spoke in opposition. He noted that
his opposition was not about competition. He noted issues regarding safety and
parking. He discussed police incident reports for the area.
Regina Smith, owner of So restaurant expressed concern about the traffic pattern and
parking in the area.
John Flake, representing Mount St. Mary's school, explained that the school was
opposed to the parking variance.
James Walter, of Grace Lutheran Church, expressed concern with the amount of
parking and safety in the area.
Bo Hawk also spoke in opposition. He discussed the previous deferral and amendment
to the application.
Erin Cassinelli also spoke in opposition. She submitted a letter and signatures of
persons in opposition.
Gina Dougherty also spoke in opposition. She expressed concerns with safety and
traffic in the area. She discussed the traffic pattern in the area and noted a concern
with noise.
Chris Travis explained that the property had hardship because the property was
completely developed with little parking.
Rajesh Mehta explained that he had visited the property at various times during the day.
He noted that he could not vote to deny the application based on the addition of the new
parking lot.
There was a brief discussion regarding the So restaurant hours.
There was a motion to approve the application, as amended and recommended by staff.
The motion failed by a vote of 2 ayes, 1 nay, 1 absent and 1 abstention (Smith). The
application was deferred to the June 30, 2014 agenda, based on the fact that there
were not three (3) votes for or against.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A CON'T.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (June 30, 2014)
Chris Travis, Robert Tucker and others were present, representing the application.
There were several persons present in opposition and several persons present in
support. Staff briefly presented the application with a recommendation of approval,
noting the revised plan as presented at the May 19, 2014 Board meeting.
Chris Travis addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained that only
variance requested was to allow more than 25 percent of the required parking to be
located off -site. He explained how close the two (2) properties were to being
contiguous. He noted that the proposed restaurant use was adding off-street parking
along Kavanaugh Blvd., where most other businesses along this street have not been
required to do so. He stated that staff supported the variance and explained. He noted
that the Hillcrest Residents Association and the Hillcrest Merchants Association had no
issues with the variance request. He briefly discussed the parking requirement and
referred to the Hillcrest Design Overlay District standards. He explained that the
proposed use of 3604 Kavanaugh Blvd. was a restaurant that serves alcohol. He noted
that any "Happy Hour" would not begin before 5:00 p.m. He noted that any use of the
property would not comply with the parking requirements.
Scott Smith also spoke in support of the application. He referred to the concept of "New
Urbanism" and explained that the proposed use of the existing building was in keeping
with this concept. He noted that the property was just outside the Hillcrest DOD which
required one-half the typical parking requirement.
Jerry Sears spoke in opposition. He explained that EJ's restaurant had a delivery
service and urged the Board to vote against the variance.
Bo Hawk also spoke in opposition. He expressed concern with traffic in the area.
Patrick Barker also spoke in opposition. He expressed concern with the existing
parking problem in the area.
Karen Flake, President of Mt. St. Mary Academy, also spoke in opposition. She
expressed concern with traffic congestion at the intersection of Kavanaugh Blvd. and N.
Lookout Street. She also expressed concern with on -street parking in the area near the
school.
Edward Oglesby also spoke in opposition. He expressed concern with additional traffic
and parking around the Mt. St. Mary's school. He noted that increased traffic the
restaurant would create would cause problems.
Melanie Fox also spoke in opposition. She explained that the traffic created by the
restaurant would create a problem.
David Stalnaker also spoke in opposition. He explained that traffic and on -street parking
was an existing problem for the area.
JUNE 30, 2014
ITEM NO.: A (CON'T.)
Erin Cassinelli also spoke in opposition. She speculated that persons would not use the
proposed new parking area and explained.
Chris Travis explained that the proposed new parking area will help the parking situation
in the entire area.
Bob Winchester asked about the delivery service for the restaurant. Mr. Travis stated
that there would be a delivery service and that it would probably use the parking behind
the building.
Vice -Chairman Wingfield stated that he did not support the application. He stated that
he could not support adding more traffic to the area.
Rajesh Mehta noted that he did support the parking variance. He referred to other
restaurants along Kavanaugh Blvd. which had been granted parking variances in the
past.
Bob Winchester also noted that he supported the application. He explained that the
issue before the Board was parking, not traffic
Carolyn Lindsey Polk noted that she would be abstaining, based on the fact that she
was not on the Board during the first two (2) public hearings on this application.
Staff added a fifth condition to their recommendation as follows:
5. The restaurant use at 3604 Kavanaugh Blvd. will have no "Happy Hour" use
beginning before 5:00 p.m.
A motion was made to approve the application as recommended by staff. The vote was
2 ayes, 1 nay, 1 absent and 1 abstention (Lindsey Polk). Based on the fact that the
application did not receive three (3) votes either for or against on its second appearance
before the Board, the application was automatically denied.