Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8849 Application 5Dear Mr. ~Chairman: I live in West Little Rock (Ward 4) and I am concerned about the challenges facing the Rodney Parham corridor. The Little Rock Planning Commission has previously demonstrated care, restricting commercial developments from encroaching upon single-family residences, overloading traffic infrastructure, or exceeding a desirable commercial -to -residential ratio while preserving green spaces. I am writing to you today to state my opposition to rezoning the Southeast corner of Rodney Parham Rd. and Breckenridge Dr. for use as a convenience store with a 16 pump fuel station and to urge you to vote against the rezoning. The proposed commercial development is not an appropriate use for the site and does not offer any significantly new or different benefits to the surrounding area, which is already sufficiently served by a number of convenience stores, fuel stations, fast food restaurants, and other businesses providing substantially similar products and services. Rezoning the single-family residential lot.for.00mmercial use is also inappropriate due to the close proximity of the site to well -established singl�-#omi1y homes. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this important matter. I request .that ,94, lse share my thoughts with the other members of the Planning Commission. Respectfully yours, Name: Address: Line I&cur 4 2z�7 Dear Mr. Chairman: I live in West Little Rock (Ward 4) and I am concerned abou7'the challenges facing the Rodney Parham corridor. The Little. Rock Planning Commission has previously demonstrated care, restricting commercial developments from encroaching upon single-family residences, overloading traffic infrastructure, or exceeding a desirable commercial -to -residential ratio while preserving green spaces. I am writing to you today to state my opposition to rezoning the Southeast corner of Rodney Parham Rd. and Breckenridge Dr. for use as a convenience store with a 16 pump fuel station and to urge you to vote against the rezoning. The proposed commercial development is not an appropriate use for the site and-does;•not offer any significantly new or different benefits to the surrounding area, which is already suffici�: 7ved by a number of convenience stores, fuel stations, fast food restaurants, and other busf.0'. �Tovi¢ing substantially similar products and services. Rezoning the single-family resp.04.0l'1. rcial use is also inappropriate due to the close proximity ofithe site to well-e jolisher3 :nes• Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this important matter. -.-I rshare my thoughts with the other members of the Planning Commission. Respectfully yours, Name: s Lkzo n Address: to WAn.)1oi�G1 '