The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZ-8829 Application 3Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and safety problems in this area, which are already severe. Address � �I I I, & c ?. . L.R . � zZZ1 Name Address Name Address Name Name Name Address Address Address Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R 2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. Name %- NaM#'4 Name Name Name Name 77 46rnyyovc/ ��tde Address Address Address Address Address Address Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. Name Name Name Name Name Name � ZIEJee-cl k Address Address Address Address Address Address rage 1 Ul /. Subj: (no subject) Date: 1/4/2013 8:51:34 P.M. Central Standard Time From: BarbShuitsAaol.com To: BarbShuitsAaol.com PETITION: Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 201 3: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use -of approximotely 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. Name Address Friday, January 04, 2013 AOL: BarbShults ragc1V1G Subj: (no subject) Date: 1/4/2013 8:51:34-PAT. Central -Standard Time From: BarbShults(cDaol.com To: BarhShultsCa�aal.com PETITION: Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2043: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. ZZ 9LZzZ�� -2 Name Address Friday, January 04, 2013 AOL: BarbShults Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and safety problems in this area, which are already severe. �AJt ' ,I 6-cr(f cr J �� Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and safety problems in this area, which are already severe. LAIVV�-� ` l! Name Address Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and safety problems in this area, which are already severe. po'_w � Name I=P �� Name Name ►TM, Name Name � ( -�- r- 0 \'i , V r- Address l �fl�-V 1 � Address Address Address Address Address Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and safety problin this area, which are already severe. If Name Name f e Name �1'5� /o�/1" 2X Address Address Address Address n, c>� ? c cete ,e-m-i ame Address Name Address don hamilton <dirk1745@gmail.com> Re: Petition to OPPOSE rezoning of 8200-8300 Cantrell January 1, 2013 4:36 PM Thanks. Outstanding work. I really appreciate your efforts and commitment. Don On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jennifer Matthews Kidd 'matthe kidd9C0Mcast.net> wrote: ACTION REQUESTED! Attached (and below in case you have trouble opening the file) please find a petition to oppose rezoning the property at 8200-8300 Cantrell. Please ask each adult member of your household to sign if. Feel free to share it with those neighbors closest to you if you still have blank spaces after signing. When complete, please drop in my porch basket at 33 Robinwood Drive OR leave it for me to pick up on your front porch, just let me know it's there. Remember, the hearing is scheduled for Thursday, Jan. 10 at 4:00pm and will be held at City Hall in downtown Little Rock. If you haven't already done so, please feel free to send a note to each of the planning commissioners listed below, even those whose terms have expired as they are likely still in office. LASTLY: PLEASE ATTEND THE HEARING! The more warm bodies filling that room and showing solidarity in opposition, the more likely we are to be successful in obtaining the outcome we desire. Thank you! Jennifer PETITION: Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of. this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. Name Address *Le(- _j Name Address Name Address Name Address Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. Name Address 17 RObinwo l Nam Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address and seriously after the character of that area, as well as increase the existing this area, which are already severe - Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in Name Name Name Name Name Name PetitionNOTtoReZo r,:; 82fi C,._83••. 125 KB Address Address Address Address Address Address Jennifer Matthews Iddd Matthews publishing group 1401 west capitol avenue, suite 185 little rock, arkansas 72201 tenniferematthebvs ulolishin .com 0 501-907.6776 and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. IV" -��'Jt't►--'LLB Name Address ,e Name Address I Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address PetitionNOTtORezOne8200_83,,, 125 KB jennifer Matthews kidd Matthews publishing group 1401 west capitol avenue, suite 185 little rock, arkansas 72201 ienniferC�raatthe�vs :iblishin -com 0 501 M7.6776 Ly f M14 PARIN RS March 29th, 2013 Mr. Monte Moore Zoning Administrator City of Little Rock, Department of Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 via email: n rnoofe@iftt1err�ck..,3€:g RE: Cantrell Heights Application Dear Monte, As noted in our conversation March 25th and email of the same date, Cantrell Heights proposes several revisions to the previously submitted Land Use and Zoning applications. Some of those revisions reflect recommendations made in the Peters and Associates traffic study report. That report has been provided to you, Brian Minyard and Bill Henry. For clarity, I'll categorize the proposed revisions, and some voluntarily proposed conditions, as "on -site" and "off -site". The site as used here is the area of the application. nn-dtP- • Reduced the area of C-3 zoning requested to 2.7 acres ■ Request an OS -zoned area between the proposed C-3 and the R-2 areas to the west • Request the balance of the 5.65 acre site, 2.86 acres, be re -zoned from R-2 to OS • Double the number of plantings over required in the west -side landscape buffer • Direct site lighting downward & inward unless otherwise required by City Paint or use building materials colored to blend with the foliage & vegetation • Remove liquor store to accommodate changes to drives and traffic -signal access Off -site: • Extend the bi-directional turn lane of Highway Ten to serve the site & Reservoir Park • Limit western -most entry -drive to right -in & right -out • Reconfigure the north leg of the intersection of Highway Ten and Andover Court We look forward presenting the revised application to the Planning Commission April 4th. Sincerely, Jeff Yates cc: Lewis Bunch, Heights Real Estate Co. A Real Estate Investment, Brokerage & Development Firm Central Arkansas: 1701 Centerview Drive, Suite 201 • Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 • T 501.225.5700 • F 501.227.0280 Northwest Arkansas: 3739 North Steele Boulevard, Suite 140 • Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703-5399 • T 479.444.9111 • F 479.444.9112 Page I of 2 Bozynski, Tony From: Moore, Monte Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 9:21 AM To: Carney, Dana; Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: P1612 - Cantrell Heights Traffic Study - 3-19-13 Attachments: P1612-Traffic-Study-Report-3-19-13.pdf FYI ............ ..........--............................... ----- ._................ I-- .............. ................ From: Henry, Bill Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 4:26 PM To: Floriani, Vince Cc: Minyard, Brian; Moore, Monte Subject: FW: P1612 - Cantrell Heights Traffic Study - 3-19-13 Vince: My only comment is that if this is approved, the existing westerly most drive should be removed and those movements would be combined with the traffic at the new proposed driveway location. The two drives are too close together and there would be conflicts with westbound lefts into the existing drive to the south and eastbound lefts into the drive on the north. By consolidating those movements, the conflict will no longer exist. I also told them they could relocate their other drive on the east end of the property to the center of their existing site, which would get them their 300' or more spacing between drives and reduce conflict points on Cantrell. William Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 501-379-1816 office 501-340-4853 fax From: Jeff Yates[mailto:JYates@irwinpartners.com] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 4:08 PM To: Moore, Monte Cc: Minyard, Brian; Henry, Bill Subject: FW: P1612 - Cantrell Heights Traffic Study - 3-19-13 Monte, Attached is the traffic study report we discussed today. Please note that I got this report Tuesday and the revised survey on Thursday of last week. Ernie Peters has reviewed this report with Bill Henry. I'm told Bill Henry had no objections to the study report or Peters & Associates' recommendations except to note that a 300' spacing between driveways should be maintained. But I won't speak for Bill. He can give you his comments himself. I've copied him on this email so that he has a copy for his files and so that you know he got it and he knows you got it. I will have a summary letter coming to you this week that outlines the proposed revisions to the applications for Land Use and Zoning changes. As noted, key elements are a reduction of the 4/1/2013 Page 2 of 2 proposed area of C-3, a request for zoning of the remaining area to be changed from R-2 to OS, and the addition of a request for an area along the west boundary to be zoned OS instead of the original request of C-3 I don't know that Brian Minyard will want a copy of the traffic study report but I have copied him on this email just in case. Please note in the Commissioners package that we've made revisions to our proposal. In our opinion, in the aggregate the revisions are substantial. They meet all or nearly all of the concerns raised by the neighbors. Thank you, Jeff Yates Jeff Yates, CLS I Partner Irwin Partners iyates@irwingartners.com 501-716-5512 — Direct 501-225-5700 — Main 1701 Centerview Dr., Suite 201 Little Rock, AR 72211 "Act as if what you do makes a difference. It does." - William James, American psychologist and philosopher From: Randy Tolbert rmailto:rmtolbert@traffic-engineers.com Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:31 AM To: 'Lewis Bunch (labbunch@shcolobal.net)' Cc: Jeff Yates; Ernie Peters Subject: RE: P1612 - Cantrell Heights Traffic Study - 3-19-13 Mr. Bunch and Mr. Yates, Attached is a PDF copy of the referenced traffic study report. If you have any questions and/or would like discuss, let us know. Thanks and have a great day. Randy Tolbert rmtolbert(M traffi c-engineers. com PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 5507 Ranch Drive, - Suite 205 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Voice: 501-868-3999 (Ext. 103) ` Fax: 501-868-9710 4/1/2013 Items A. & A.I. LU13-O3-01 Z-8829 Letters of Opposition 21 December 2012 Mr. Monte Moore, Zoning Administrator Planning and Development Department City of Little Rock 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Allan Snook, President The Ridge Property Owners Association 11 Ridgeview Court Little Rock, AR 72227 builheartSO42@mac.com 5014161985 RE: Proposed land use amendment and rezoning of 3.62 acres west and adjacent to Cantrell Heights Shopping Center Dear Mr. Moore, The Ridge Property Owners Association strongly opposes the proposed reclassification of 3.62 acres adjacent to Cantrell Heights Shopping Center from Residential (R-2) to Commercial (C-3). Over 900 homeowners in 4 subdivisions (The Ridge, Robinwood, River Ridge and Foxcroft) can be negatively affected. Concerns include: * New commercial intrusion into an historically residential section of Cantrell Road * Significant increase in already heavy traffic flow • A realistic potential for increased crime • Decreased property values The Cantrell Road corridor west of Cantrell Heights Shopping Center to 1-430 has remained solidly residential for decades. Our concern is rezoning the 3.62 acres will begin a precedent of increasing commercialization on this section of Cantrell Road. In 1976, this same property was submitted for rezoning. The request was denied. Traffic flow is currently overburdened on this section of Cantrell, which provides a major east - west corridor for the city. Motor vehicle accidents are frequent and several are deadly. Speeding is a constant concern. Heavy traffic loads make The Ridge ingress and egress difficult and hazardous. Traffic concerns will become dangerous. Crime occurs daily around our subdivision, especially in commercialized areas from Mississippi Avenue to Andover Court and along Reservoir Road. C-3 rezoning will predictably increase crime. The Ridge subdivision consists of 23 homes with high assessment values and high real estate taxes. This proposal to rezone to commercial will detrimentally change the nature and value of our properties as well as homes from 8220 Cantrell Road to Pleasant Valley Drive. Sincere�rs, Allan Snook Page 1 of 2 Carney, Dana From: Don Hamilton [dirk1745@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 7:05 PM To: jtferstl@comcast.net; wfr@ipa.net; brock-lr@sbcglobal.net; dabbus@ualr.edu; wchangose; jd; becky; keith.fountain; dan.harpool; obray; apierce Cc: Bozynski, Tony; Moore, Monte; Carney, Dana; Malone, Walter Subject: 8220-8300 Cantrell Road, Case #Z8829, rezoning from R-2 residential to C-3 Commercial Attachments: document2012-12-18-153635.pdf LADIES/GENTLEMEN: This is to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning application for general commercial to rezone the captioned residential property on Cantrell Road (North side of Cantrell Rd, approximately 400" west of Andover Court, according to the application). This application is set for hearing before you on Thursday, January 10, but now deferred by the applicant until February 21, 2013, I understand. Also enclosed are attachments (including a history) regarding the earlier application in 1976 to rezone 8220 Cantrell Road (included in the current application) which was denied then by both the Planning Commission and the Board of Directors. The present application has no more merit now than the earlier application had then. That earlier application for El Quiet business was opposed by the property owners along Cantrell, as well as in both Robinwood and River Ridge subdivisions, as evidenced by the 30 pages of petitions opposing that rezoning application, signed by 284 residents named in the petitions. Those petitions are in the CLR Planning Commission files, along with the documents enclosed herewith. Additional petitions by neighbors (including The Ridge) now opposing the current application will be filed shortly and made available for your review. My wife, Suzanne, and I live In Robinwood where we built our home at #1 Glenleigh Drive in 1965 and we have lived there since then. We believe that the proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining area and seriously alter the character of our neighborhood, as well as increase the existing traffic problems on Cantrell Road in our area.. The traffic and congestion problems are already severe and this proposed development expanding the existing commercial use will only make matters worse, change the character of the area and adversely affect our neighbors, their enjoyment of the use of their residential properties, as well as their land values. The last thing which we need is more commercial properties adjacent to the so-called "Cantrell Heights", as described in the rezoning application. These will only add to the blight of this existing marginal 1960s style commercial strip center built on fill from the highway department in the adjacent ravine back in the 1970s. Moreover, it will add to the existing traffic and congestion problems created by those additional commercial properties which have been strip or spot zoned along Cantrell east of Cantrell Heights over the past few decades. The CLR Planning staff recommends denial of this application, as stated in the staff report, and I strongly concur. I respectfully request that you follow the staff report and deny this application for rezoning. I look forward to appearing before you on this matter and expressing my opposition further. Please make a copy of this email with attachments a part of you permanent file on this matter for future reference. Yours truly, 1/10/2013 Page 2 of 2 Don F. Hamilton No. 1 Glenleigh Drive Little Rock, AR 72227 501-225-1959 dii-kl745@jzmail.com 1/10/2013 Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: Don Hamilton [dirk1745@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:13 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: Bozynski, Tony; Moore, Monte Subject: Cantrell Road Zoning history on 8220 in current application Attachments: document20l2-12-18-153635.pdf DANA: Per our telephone conversation this morning, here are the attachments (from CLR Planning files) which contain some background information on the Cantrell Road commercial zoning application set for a hearing next week. I previously shared this information with both Tony and Monte. Best regards. Don Hamilton Don F. Hamilton 1/3/2013 OiPTIM OF P,.E,70VING CASE Z-2985 AND 7.-2.985 -A The `llstory of this case began January 14, 1976 at whieb ti-me a petit;i.on for 1:ezoni_.1c, was submitted to the aonia,g office for a hearing on Martib 4, 1.9M There was c., re -quest for deferral of Cbe ease., therefore, =no ac:t:i.011. ws_eq t:slren on ?March 4th. except; -to defer to the April 1., 1976 meeting, Cr. April 1st: a hearing of the case: was accomplished and many mtittn.s made by Cottutt.iasionet:t3 to resolve tile issue, Resolution could not be #,sine<3 and the Cotmaisss-Lon agaii.n deferred the case, This time -until May 6, 1976The-rt• , =a1aa:e neveral ctb,jectors present at the April meeting, On May 6th the applicant appeared and requested that his Applifca3t:3.on be withdraw-n from furtber consideration, `lliere were a number of objector - present and stated that they did not want deferral or withdrawal, but rsome action on the .^.ase� 11je Gommissicat3 voted to withdraw Lhe riaquevt, (Sketches, rkaps and minutes of March 4, April 1. and May 6 at:tacbed, The next item of 4oning history occurred August 27, 1076 whea a second rezoE31ng p.iAti.o-1 was filed on these Lots. This request: was for. "E-1" as before. 7-Tir hearing date set: was September 30, 1976, At this -Meetint; there, were several objectors and petitions of many signatures, After a lengthy discussion the Co-m-mission denied the request. "x� Y�E�ct act:3.un was a}i appeal filed by the applx�caut Wi.tl) the Lity> i i.rz-1, request 5.ns', ,10-a:rd of Directors review of the application, he ?hard he-ard t re case -- No-v;nfbex- 16, 1.976 at: which time the reque-3t;. 'wars de-ct.led. pies of Panning Conuaission tni_nutes, sketches, traps, etc, ftom. Sept.. 30 aad Board ineeting, Nfov, 11., 1976 attached,) City of Little Rook Office of C,ty. � wl t;:kQo?nprehensive. Nl&.Kh8VI at 6! oadway Manning L-Allo Rock. Arkansas 7-12'0; :i76.611 1 This is to ads; P se luau that zx3 ca;lneC'on witl~ yoxlr a?li.rati�1t fa: c z1t;e . D-I.stri.ct, t,ee following actionwas t eti by the Planni.np na (a) _...... Denied Your request as submitted Recoa?rueaded approval as applied for. Recormnended approval M provi.ded r .._. _._.... Recommended rezoning to Deferred to (at your request) Art ord-1171:xs'e effecting this 'rezoning-woK £t>=i�,1.��9 .,x s>�rei.t�3t: i;raerd o r Directors for its consideraviou at tts mneti'rl ______"".._ __. ._................... Office of Comprehensive Vlam,i, ag w3. ~------------- -----' '-_ -L- ` 9- 30-76 Case Nu -suer: Z-2985-A tigspl i^_arst : A. M. Cooper Location8220 Cantrell Road Description; Long; legal Present Classification, 1°A" One -family District xroposed Class:iflcation: '°P-1" Quiet Business District Proposed Use. Professio-aaloffice Stet{me f Recommendation, This applicati.oa involves a t:r;3ct-. of lzmil which was before the commission on several occasi.ora during March, April and May, 1976, 11te ou-ner, at the May k, 1976 Planning Commission meeting, Withdrew the application from further consideration, The retluest: for rezoui1;:g at: 011at: time involved "r-l" Quiet. Business and `hat: is the request at this t,fiue. The st.au_'f restates its previous recommendation, which was; It is at this point on Cantrell where the issue of strip com- mercial Zoning out to Int. ilighway #430 should be resolved since from this point west is developed solidly residential. If s>ucin strip rezoning were desirable, this application would logically be approved as requested. The entire site could also -be approved for S0 1°' providing it were accepted as firm commitme-at to pro- vide a buffer ,ryound which no further intrusions izuto the established residential area would be approved. Since a resi- dence exists on the west: part of the property, t:`�e waist part only could be rezoned to 7fE-1", thereby providing the aTAMei: Soule development potential and retaining a buffer against: fUrt,lICT in.t rusion, of "E-1 i or "F" zonlug. Of the alternatives, the staff recomnerds approval as requested wiltl: the act -on to reflect an. intent Cis termitla.te the westward. "tension of commercial zoning on Cantrell Road. 7 JIM _; ''KSG-N-C"-OtJTR:'iC0R, P.O. BOX 9AB, ]_ITTLF ROCK, ARK, 111203 . SfG ., .•3i;ifS 's'4TC-%2n)6Ao•6', 5 September r r , ' 9r 6 To P1 arindng Co:"mi s;ion Members & Stuff & City ty Directors RE, Proposed Rezoning of 8220 Centre',] (toad from "Tie' to ;IL -:I( Sor):s thirty years ago I visited Arkansas, fell in love with your beautiful .` to :<c, and 11vi7 thereafter rriov<sd to l..t tt.le Rock. About twenty^-ortea years 0..90 1. startQdl i€?y 0c-"n con-• :trkict:ion company and have since built; i t: into an international organization with head- quarters stil•1 here in Little Rock. I hope I have Contributed in a srr..=all wry t-0 the C i t:y•'s; growth, dev>'~lopraTent and progress. just over. eight years agc:, p:3rr.h aseTi my pressunt horn. al.- 8370 Cant -ell Road and have worked herd ever since to make it a show pl ac-e. 1 would like to personally invite each of you to step by and see just what I have dine, Early .his year Mr¢ Arthur Cooper at 82.20 Cantrell voacl P-:t tioned the City Pl main.', CorTra ssion for the above zoning change; but, after three separate Planning t:orrartission rm( cet nc,s in Mxrrh, April and May, 'and inn fac<: of a pe:•ti Lion signed by over '30r; objectors he wt>^drew his petit -on. You will recall the;t Mr. B. Finley Vinson mad: an ir)passioncd 71ta at the final meetinci against haphazard strip zoning and at that ;:arTe.mee1 C�xr3iscion Chaia-rr:n, Mr. Russel) McClean said, "T feel this probably has, been prat to rr.6st. 1 think- we 'have seen the end of that.''. Wi I l , I am a�f rat d we haven't. Mr. Cooper has again petitioned for the change and it wi l l be priysented to the Lorranission on September 30th. T hieseech each and everyone of you to drive C�Intrel l Road from Pleasant 1:0 Miss i and I defy you to name a more beautiful approach to any City in tht) 'United States. The l ovcl y i andscaped lawns with the beautiful homes set: back behind the :;a i 1 arid state 1 y tine trees, Until, that is, you come across the horrible abortion, called C a:ri.rr:l l M: It i ;a nc>t only a disgrace to the City, it is also in vi o i ati or o$ the Ci t:">`' s ordi name e "or no is having landscaped Its parking area. Is beautiful Cantrell Road to becomeanother usher Avenue? Another Arch Street Pike"' Anoi' fer Rodney ParhaT:r? Is this whra,t: yoga want for your City? Are you going to allow One i ndi-vi d ,al to start the decay of one of our most gorgeot's areas M Little Rock i 3-a di rec t defia-r)cc of the over- 300 interested property owner% that have: already voiced Oeir objei.- ti onO I should hope not. Won't you please stand up and, be counted? W0171 ° : y:>u pl e-sk- e 'L� £:G Your t1i>�eC ii •:in i against this proposed rape of our t�eaUt i fti f !.3 t-i > 1 ��E:iJ ;IO I $� Con - against i der the consequences. I is -is your City too, you know. Very sincerely yours, -.3j�rT-M STATES- .W. MSAS CILLIN01' MAM AND hi='NYORX OHIO OrSLAsMM", IIE:7J%aS�t•`/c. �i,f?::Z �:SC:+ftSftl rAaAr'Ac VFAIr71>•F1 A TO TO & W*N'T?e.At.. Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: Brent Staley [bstaley@staleyinc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:16 AM To:'apierce@summitbankdirect.com';'wfr@ipa. net'; Carney, Dana;'obray@aol.com'; 'dan.harpool r@complete.com'; 'keith.fountain@regions .com'; 'becky@beckyflnney.com'; 'jtfe rstl@co mcast. net'; 'jd@wilcompany.com'; 'dabubbus@ualr.edu' Subject: Little Rock Planning Commission Jan 10th Dear Commissioners, We are writing you as constituents of Little Rock and benefactors of our city government. It has come to our attention that there has been a zoning petition for 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from R2 to a C3 classification. As property owners and tax payers in the area of Robinwood located to the north of the proposed parcel change petition, we request that you deny this proposal for the following reasons: The area is already congested due to commuting traffic from West Little Rock to downtown and the reverse in the evenings. Our neighborhood has no street light and there are constantly vehicle accidents along this corridor of Cantrell. Adding commercial property to the area will inadvertently worsen the traffic and congestion and in our opinion, will decrease the safety of the neighborhood. We purchased this property four years ago due to the location and scenery. Adding commercial property to the Cantrell corridor will, in our opinion, have a negative impact on the inherent value of our property. As commissioners we trust that you will make the best choice available for the long term health and wellness of our city, and that you will understand our concerns and not take them lightly. Please deny the request for rezoning of 8200-8300 Cantrell Rd. from R2 to C3. Respectfully, Brent and Natalie Staley Brent Staley 18 Glenleigh Little Rock, AR 72227 This electronic message transmission and any prior or subsequent transmissions in the same "e- mail chain", contains information from Staley, Incorporated and is to be considered confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (501-978-3800) immediately. 1/3/2013 Pagel of 3 Carney, Dana From: alice andrews [alice209ok@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 10:45 AM To: jtferstl@comcast.net; Carney, Dana Subject: Fw: Re -zoning 8200 - 8300 Cantrell Alice B. Andrews ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: alice andrews <alice209ok@yahoo.com> To: "dabubbus@ualr.edu" <dabubbus@ualr.edu>; )d@wilcornpany.com" <jd@wilcompany.com>; "jtfersti@comcast.net" <jtfersti c@comcast.net>; "becky@beckyfinney.com" <becky@beckyfinney.com>; "keith.fountain@regions. corn" <keith.fountain@regions. corn>; "dan.harpool@complete.com" <dan.harpool@complete.com>; "obray@aol.com" <obray@aol.com>; "apierce@summitbankdirect.com" <apierce@summitbankdirect.com>; "wfr@ipa.net" <wfr@ipa.net> Cc: "jennifer@matthewspublishing.com" <jennifer@matthewspublishing.com>; Don Hamilton <don.hamifton c@lrwu.com> Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:25 PM Subject: Re -zoning 8200 - 8300 Cantrell Dear Commissioner, I strongly oppose re -zoning the property, 8200-8300 Cantrell Road. This neighborhood and west on Cantrell is zoned and developed as residential, single family. It is a great place to live. Please do not make a decision that increases traffic and changes the character of long-established neighborhoods. Re -zoning the aforementioned property would significantly increase traffic on the already overwhelmed Cantrell Rd. I do not want to see Cantrell Rd. become developed like JFK Boulevard, West Markham, Rodney Parham or Chenal (immediate-ly West of 1-430). Cantrell Rd. is a dangerous roadway now with left turns being quite hazardous. Currently, most cars traversing Cantrell are speeding at 15-20 mph above the speed limit of 40. Utility poles are frequently struck, leaving neighborhoods without power for some time. Deer and other wildlife, living in the wooded areas on both sides of Cantrell, are 1/7/2013 Page 2 of 3 often hit by speeding cars. A progressive city must incornorate the planning of green S12aces that interrupt urban/suburban development. This practice helps create cleaner air, promotes outdoor exercise, provides space for trails and needed space for wildlife. The Robinwood and River Ridge neighborhoods fulfill that need. Little Rock, as Capitol of the "natural state" should set the example for sharing our space with wildlife. It is badly overdue. Please see the neighborhood petition: PETITION: Before the City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development, January 10, 2013: Petition Opposing Rezoning 8200-8300 Cantrell Road from "R-2" Single Family District to "C-3" General Commercial District in Case #Z-8829 We, the undersigned signers of this petition, are residents of the area near 8200-8300 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas, and we are opposed to the application to rezone this property from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial District for commercial use of approximately 3.6 acres, being a part of Tracts "C" and "D" of the 1925 Subdivision of Hyland Homes Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas. We believe that this proposed rezoning will adversely affect the adjoining residential area and seriously alter the character of that area, as well as increase the existing Cantrell Road traffic congestion and problems in this area, which are already severe. I respectfully request that you oppose the request to re -zone the 8200- 8300 Cantrell Rd. property. Alice B. Andrews 63 Robinwood Dr. 1/7/2013 Page 3 of 3 Little Rock, AR 72227 501-219-4295 1/7/2013 Carney, Dana From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:57 AM To: 'Jennifer Matthews Kidd'; jtfe rstl@ com cast. net; wfr@ipa.net; brock-Ir@sbcglobal.net; dabbus@ualr.edu; wchangose; jd; becky; keith.fountain; dan.harpool; obray; apierce; Bozynski, Tony; Moore, Monte; Malone, Walter; jd@wilcompany.com Cc: don hamilton; buff blass; chiz chisenhall; al snook; Sherry Bartley; alice andrews; david gruenewald; suzanne hamilton; sylvia orton; jill lawrence Subject: RE: OPPOSITION TO REZONING 8220-8300 Cantrell Road, Case #Z8829, rezoning from R-2 residential to C-3 Commercial Thank you for your interest in this matter. The item has been deferred to the February 21, 2013 Planning Commission agenda and will not be heard today. Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 W. Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 -----Original Message ----- From: Jennifer Matthews Kidd[mailto:jmatthewskidd@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:00 AM To: jtferstl@comcast.net; wfr@ipa.net; brock-lr@sbcglobal.net; dabbus@ualr.edu; wchangose; jd; becky; keith.fountain; dan.harpool; obray; apierce; Bozynski, Tony; Moore, Monte; Carney, Dana; Malone, Walter; jd@wilcompany.com Cc: don hamilton; buff blass; chiz chisenhall; al snook; Sherry Bartley; alice andrews; david gruenewald; suzanne hamilton; sylvia orton; jill lawrence Subject: OPPOSITION TO REZONING 8220-8300 Cantrell Road, Case #Z8829, rezoning from R-2 residential to C-3 Commercial Dear Planning Commissioners: I cannot express to you with strong enough emphasis in a letter how adamantly opposed to rezoning the properties at 8220-8200 Cantrell Road I am personally. Traffic congestion. Traffic volume. Safety. Destruction of desperately needed green space. Increased potential for crimes of all sorts against our families and our homes. Increased noise pollution. All around general devastation of a residential way of life for those of us next door. For these reasons and many more, I respectfully implore you to vote NO to the proposal before you to rezone this area. And as president of the Robinwood Property Owners Association, I speak for our entire membership when I tell you that we are a vocal, active and unified opposition. And we stand in solidarity with our neighboring POA at The Ridge, also unanimous in their opposition, as well as members of the River Ridge POA, many of whom have expressed their emphatic support. I look forward to meeting you and sharing our concerns in person. Thank you for your time and attention, Jennifer jennifer matthews kidd 1 matthews publishing group 1401 west capitol avenue, suite 185 little rock, arkansas 72201 jennifer@matthewspublishing.com 0 501.907.6776 m 501.690.9393 f 501.907.6777 www.matthewspublishing.com dropbox: https://dropbox.yousendit.com/MatthewsPublishing Page 1 of 1 Carney, Dana From: Al Snook [bullheart5042@mac.com] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 1:34 PM To: daubbus@ualr.edu; jd@wilcompany.corn; jtfersti(gcomcast,net; becky@beckyfinney.com; keith.fountainr@regions.com; obray@aol.com; apiercegsummitbankdirect.com; Carney, Dana Subject: Opposition to rezoning Begin forwarded message: From: schwartz921 Qcomcast.net Subject: Opposition to rezoning Date: February 8, 2013 8:00:06 AM CST To: bullheart5042(W-mac.com Please forward to Little Rock Planning Commission members: Although I am unable to attend the commission's February 21 meeting ,this email identifies my strong disapproval of the proposed rezoning of Cantrell Road (8220, 224, and 8300) from R-2 to C-3 status. My opposition is shared by my neighbors on Racquet Court in the Foxcroft neighborhood, which lies adjacent to the proposed rezoning area. Our street is already reached by the sounds of vehicles, their headlights in the evenings, and the lights of the buildings on the existing commercial area of Cantrell Road. The development of additional commercial activity will only increase these unwelcome intrusions into one of Little Rock's finest and most livable streets. Traffic and commerce on this section of Cantrell Road is already at a high level. The frequent re -leasing of businesses there indicates that the existing structure offers ample opportunity for new business investment. Allowing additional commercial development will only accelerate the problems of business turnover and storefront vacancy. The residential sites and the magnificent trees in many of front yards along this stretch of the road offer a welcome relief from the concentration of businesses and parking lots to the east. Little Rock needs a balanced usage of residential and commercial sites. This balance will be negatively impacted by extending the existing strip mall and removing the green space/residential lots. I urge your NO vote on this unnecessary and unwelcome proposal. Marvin Schwartz 11 Racquet Court Little Rock, AR 72227 501-312-2288 House 501-831-4024 Cell Email: schwartz921 gcomcast.net 2/22/2013 C. IE IS E:.NT.IALL, N fT Sit ti TJD & J r-1-T.A.x, I? A. A-r•ron�rr y.; AT LAN' 11£rxt0NS : ENTFA 41J0 W'F'S'r CAPITOL, SUITE PTS40 320C:K, Allli<ZNSAS %2i-Ol TLLEPHONE 55011 :M-5hU0 FAX ISUI; 372-4!:41 WWW.0T1J1ZvN.00I'T1 February 18, 2012 Re� Case # Z8829 Proposed rezoning from R-2 to C-3 8220-8300 Cantrell Road Dear Commissioner: I am writing to ydu to express my extreme concerns about the proposal to rezone four lots along Cantrell Read from R-2 residential to C'-3 commercial and the resultant impact on the residential areas near this location. 1 live in The Ridge Subdivision and this project will essentially be in nay back yard; as well as those of some of my neighbors. The fart that this proposal. if approved, will impact this neighborhood, the remaining homes along Cantrell and home, in Foxcroft is ungUesitionable. As proposed, there are NO RESTRICTIONS on the use of the property ether, than the blanket provisions of C-3, which is very broad, There is no plan to deal with lighting, shielding of the buildings, use of the development for parking or any restriction on clubs or restaurants, etc. that could face ouf subdivision and Foxcroft. No detailed plans of any nature have been provided by the developer. A number of area residents will be forced to look at whatever is placed there if the development is approved. A map provided by the developer, which is attached as Attachment 1, shows can aerial view of the immediate area. It is a photograph, and as such, it is accurate as lar as it Uoflbs. What it does riot show is how close the proposed rezoned area comes to the developed Subdivisions of Foxcroft and The Ridge: as well as the remaining homes along Cantrell. This is shown by the detail of the proposed rezoned area on Attachment 2. It bounds property along Cantrell, property in The Midge and in Foxcroft. Attachment 3 is a topographical map showing the line -of -sight impact on the surrounding residential arenas. By looking at this map, one can readily ;see, that there is a barge valley between Foxcroft, 'fhc: Ridge: and Cantrell where the developrrtent is proposed. The new development will be vary visible to these areas and with CIIISKINLIALL, Ni3:s,rvux3 &:,.JL;i:T..TAN, 1-'.A. approximately 20% of the trees shown on the: aerial photograph now on the ground because of the Christmas storm, the property owners on the streets marked in red will have a very clear view of the back of the development. Attachments 4 and b are pictures of the back and west end of the current development. Beauty is somewhat subjective, but I doubt that anyone really wants these views in their back yard. € can assure you € do not. I know others will address separate issues regarding this matter, so I will close with a request that you consider the home owners that hauc; invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in their homes. All of the hornet' in The Ridge were, built, Starling in the early to mid -I 980s, after to prior attempt to rezone part of this area was rejected by the; Planning Commission. I world urge you to follow your past precedent which was to reject a rezoning to commercial statue lone before "The Ridge was developed. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Larry hisenhall •n w tron ns •� � E' x 1 ' '�, m �, :ro• t so pr M -- 0 cn 0,0 N -T N be�A n ti. ro �8 C„7 ul m 3^. > su ' CD w � ra as � � . 0 row. 0 co cr Jo fry�47� m M G3 p ' y' U Ffi of N r ❑n❑ N'-r„� ui rh ro N - r Vs. co 7 j Cl S. G� 3 ail. QV :.'..? < :N:. �•Sa fir, :...:..:.:........... .. . .............L.-._.... .._.w. G'. f \. v �......... '� .ry f 90 oi. ' �• ai � .r • r � •�f. ' ice.. ^�� YtiC•^.ter-. •- S.l } iFff �T' Y+/:}.. afat 4i ... - M" i �: L. . �... _..-_-_j� FRANKLIN McLARTY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February 19, 2013 Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivisions City of Little Rock Planning and Development Department 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Planning Commission Item A.1, File # Z-8829-Rezoning from R-2 to C-3, 8200- 8300 Cantrell Road Mr. Carney: I am writing to express my great concern and objection to the above referenced rezoning request that is to be considered before the Little Rock Planning Commission on Thursday, February 21, 2013. 1 am a resident in The Ridge subdivision adjacent and just west of the subject property being requested for rezoning from R-2 to C-3. Along with many of my neighbors, I firmly object to this rezoning from R-2 to C-3 based primarily on the following; 1.) Such C-3 zoning will encroach on the residential zoning buffer surrounding our neighborhood which we all currently enjoy. When considering and making this home investment, I along with many of my neighbors relied on this protective zoning buffer. 2.) Such C-3 zoning will undoubtedly increase the traffic flow on this section of Cantrell making ingress and egress from the many surrounding residential properties and neighborhoods even more difficult and dangerous. By expanding the commercial node in to this residential area along Cantrell, such would be creating additional traffic where current volumes already exceed the capacity of the roadway. Please also note the current configuration of Cantrell Road does not allow for a center left turn lane just west of the Cantrell Heights Shopping Center, thus making exiting traffic from an expanded shopping center even more dangerous for neighbors and shoppers to contend with on a daily basis. 3.) The proposed improvements of these lots being considered for rezoning will undoubtedly compound drainage and water runoff issues for adjacent property owners and those properties north of the Cantrell Heights Shopping Center. 4.) This request for zoning does not appear to match up with the future Land Use Plan outlined by the City for this area of Little Rock. It is for these primary reasons listed above that I along with many other residential owners in the area strongly object to this rezoning request. If this rezoning is allowed to proceed, it is my great fear that this will be the first domino to fall in allowing commercial development to span from this point on Cantrell all the way to 1 -430 thus disrupting and negatively affecting a much larger number of residences along Cantrell and those neighborhoods accessed directly and solely by Cantrell Road. In light of such, I respectfully request that you present this letter to the Planning Commission for its thoughtful consideration. It is my solid hope the Planning Commission will agree that a "no" vote on this proposal is in the best interest of the surrounding neighbors and the City of Little Rock as a whole. If you need to contact me directly, I can be reached at 501-374-4664. 1 thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter. i cerely, c F anklin H. McLa y # Ridgeview Court Little Rock, AR 72227 F . &AW Traffic Study Cantrefl Heights Retail Development prepared for.• Lewis Bunch Cantrell Road (Highway 10) 1AW PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. • CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING • 5507 Ranch Drive - Suite 205 (501) 868-3999 12 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Fax (501) 868-9710 Little Rock, Arkansas p, T E 11. ARI{ tiA SAS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ERNEST J. PETERS No. 4682 JJI Project No.: P-1612 March 19, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION 1 THE SITE 2 STREET SYSTEM 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 6 TRIP GENERATION & SITE TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 12 TRAFFIC VOLUME ASSIGNMENTS CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE OTHER ISSUES FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FIGURES APPENDIX Trip Generation Data Vehicle Turning Movement Count Data Capacity and Level of Service Calculations PETERS &ASSOCIATES tj ENGINEERS, INC. 15 16 24 26 29 4 � rrz $`((Trd r Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc., has conducted a traffic en- gineering study relating to proposed re -zoning of an approximate 3.6 acre tract for retail development (shopping center). The tract is to be located on the north side of Cantrell Road, just west of Andover Court (on the west side of the existing Cantrell Heights shopping center) in Little Rock, Arkansas. The primary focus of this report is to assess vehicular trip -generations associated with the proposed re -zoning and traffic operational characteristics of the adjacent intersections and of the new access drives proposed to serve the site. Re -zoning the site is proposed to consist of ap- proximately 20,000 square feet of shopping center. A copy of the project site plat is included in the Appendix for reference. This is a report of methodology and findings relating to a traffic engineering study undertaken to: • Evaluate existing traffic conditions at the following study intersections: o Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Ex- isting East Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Ac- cess Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Ac- cess Drive. • Determine projected traffic volumes entering and exiting the proposed development at the nearby study intersections and the new site access drive intersections proposed to serve the site. • Identify the effects on traffic operations for existing traffic in combination with site -generated traffic associated with the proposed re -zoning. • Evaluate traffic operations for the study intersections and the access drive intersections proposed to serve the site and make recommendations for improvements which may be necessary and appropriate for acceptable traffic operations. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC Page 1 i In the following sections of this traffic study report are traffic data, study methods, findings and recommendations. The study is technical in nature. Analysis techniques employed are those most commonly used in the traffic engineering profession for traffic impact analysis. Certain data and calculations relative to traffic operational analysis are referenced in the report. Complete calcu- lations and data are included in the Appendix of the report. The location of the development is within the city limits of Little Rock in Pulaski County, Arkansas. The tract where re -zoning has been proposed for retail development is on the west side of the existing Cantrell Heights shopping center on the north side of Cantrell Road and just west of Andover Court. Development of the site could be expected to accommodate the construction of an approximately 20,000 square feet of retail center plus a new ac- cess drive and parking. The site location and vicinity are shown on Figures 1 and 2, which follow. Access to the site, is proposed from one new access drive to inter- sect Cantrell Road opposite an existing access drive on the south side of Cantrell Road that currently serves an office building and a right -out only access drive near the southwest edge of the site. Additional access will be provided with connections to the exist- ing Cantrell Heights shopping center to the immediate east. The existing Cantrell Heights shopping center is now served by three points of access along Cantrell Road: Cantrell Heights East Ac- cess Drive opposite Andover Court, Cantrell Heights Middle Ac- cess Drive and Cantrell Heights West Access Drive. The dis- tances between these access drives are depicted on Figure 4, "Directional Distribution - Site Traffic." There are several existing retail uses in the immediate vicinity of the site. Accordingly, the noon peak hour, as well as typical AM and PM peak traffic periods of the adjacent street are the traffic operating conditions which have warranted primary traffic analy- sis as a part of this study. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 2 RryIgRq� pyN . �. V♦LV Wli�lE � � � 1 S?=411'yyy- +8. LA p,_ RS.�.c9Yw lb C 'A*_Uorm 1tE PVNfpYRT �Y j�•-.... ANC % dJ,DR e Er y n M'P,Y6suYAt F,hL11.OF9 L4 - re o, StEM =Ww"Ltl"L a. e --.. s4 SITE twEvimv DR 5 sauwacr ^ rcr 3YOA . ipuoLEu pwwow sue. ff x F F nm cGq[AVml-r wwsiM r' o Y .�, AC�' O.t]61 Fu eBIRP+tu.m EST _ esT .g v�nuc�mcE Mx �: ' d'A areserrlc�v� MUTE e•S.Netwv+ ?w�rorecr � � ^ $ c � � � � - . ""°"'E°A Figure 1 - Vicinity Ma . Y-' i'AL%LFLNwRQ 4Y 4EF3.v0�R L��$�L60R "` RiROP: EN �'i $ p PETERS k ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS. INC Figure 2 - Site Location Map Page 3 Cantrell Road, also Highway 10, is a 55-foot wide roadway consisting of two eastbound lanes, two westbound lanes and a bi-directional center left -turn lane. On the west side of the proposed new site access drive location, Cantrell Road be- gins to taper to a four -lane roadway. However, there is a striped out portion of roadway along the south side of Cantrell Road that is currently un-used (to Reservoir Park Road). Cantrell Road is asphalt and constructed with curbs and gutters and there are sidewalks along the south side of Cantrell Road (opposite of the tract proposed for re -zoning) and along the north and south sides of the Cantrell Road, along the existing Cantrell Heights frontage. The speed limit on Cantrell Road at the site is 35 miles per hour. The intersection of Cantrell Road and Andover Court is sig- nal controlled. This is a 2-phase signal operation with signal indications mounted on mast arms. The controller location is on the southeast corner of the intersection. In addition to controlling Andover Court (the south leg) the signal also controls traffic using the existing Cantrell Heights East Ac- cess Drive. The traffic signal also controls traffic for adja- cent connected properties immediately to the east. The following photos show the general layout of Cantrell Road and Andover Court and the existing Cantrell Heights access drives in the vicinity of the study area. Photos were taken at locations as indicated on the captions. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC, Page 4 Y PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC � Andover Court Looking east on Cantrell Road toward Andover Court. Existing Cantrell Heights Middle Access Drive Looking west on Cantrell Road toward Andover Court. Existing Cantrell Heights East Access Drive The proposed site Looking west on Cantrell Road toward Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive Existing Cantrell Heights West Access Drive Looking east on Cantrell Road at the site. Existing office building access drive opposite the proposed site Page 55 Traffic count data collected as a part of this study include AM, noon and PM peak hours vehicle turning movement counts at the following intersections: o Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive. The peak hours vehicle turning movement count data at these intersections are summarized in the following peak hour turning movement Charts 1 thru 9 and are presented in more detail in the Appendix of this report. AM and PM peak hours vehicle turning movement counts made as a part of this study are shown on Figure 3, 'Existing Traffic Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hours." Noon peak hour vehicle turning movement counts made as a part of this study are shown on Figure 3A, 'Existing Traffic Volumes - Noon Peak Hour." The existing Cantrell Heights shopping center is approxi- mately 29,000 square feet (including the existing liquor store building). PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 6 Access Ddve Control Rd. Andover Court From NurthJaghi From East-Thru From South -Left C.rtre C-drel Rd. ■ FroomN rth-ThNve ru ■ From ■ From West-Rkjlt Drive Andover Court Cantre0 Rd. ■Access From Norm -Lett ■ From South -Right ® From West-Thro Cantrell Rd Andover Court Cerdre8 Rd. From Emd-Right 5w From South-Thru From=:Lefl 5w 400 300 ? 200 100 0 4 0 m V O O O O O O O O Time of Day Chart 1 AM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Andover Court Chart 2 Noon Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Andover Court and Cantrell Road Access Drive Cantrell Rtl. Andover Court From Norm -Right From East-Thru ■ From South -Left Access Drive Centrell Rtl Cantrell Rd. From North-Thru From East -Left ■ From West -Right Access Drive Andover Court Cantrell Rd. From North{eft From Soulh.Rkpit From West-Thru Cantrell Rd . Andover Court ■ Cantrell Rd. Frm Earl Rlght From Sadru -ThFrom West -Left 3w 250 200 E 0 160 7 100 50 Time of Day i�PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS. INC. 6w 500 4w 15 300 2w 100 o m L V 5 1905 1928 18 6 834 878 38 Iw 300 V 250 3 200 910 947 150 100 34 50 Access Drive � � N 1 - AM Count Data D7:15 AM '� 08:00 AM ter- N ■ Andover Court ■ 1p Access Drive ■ y i 1 - Noo ount Daalr 12: . - 12:if5 PM 2 ,60 - 14 CL 1932 1905 27 1 North Page 7 17 897 834 46 — 0 w 1002 910� 61 ("North over Court FromrthagM ® From Efts-Thru ■ From m SouUFLeft Access DrIve CeMrell Rd. CertreI Rd From North-Th. From Easl-Lett From West-RIgIt Access Drive Andover Court Cerrhell Rd From North -Left From South -Right From=Thru Carrell Rd Andover Court Cendrell Rd From East -Right From South-Thru From West -Left Soo 400 300 200 100 0 Soo 15 Soo 01873 1 400 300 61 zoo .a 100 0 d L O O O O Time of Day Chart 3 PM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Andover Court and Cantrell Road It � It � It � 1■�I� ■It � l�■ I■tll in Un- U1 Chart 4 AM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive ■Middle Access Drive CeMrNI Rd. Cantrell Rtl. From North-Idghl From Eest-Rkeat-Thru ®Middle Access Drive Carlton Rd. CatrelI Rd. From North -Left From East-Thru ■ From West -Left wi soo L=i 500 400 a 0 300 200 100 0 i Q 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 Time of Day PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 1096 1135 33 M O M .I V Access Drive - PM. Count 23 1936 1873 40 1173 1096 1 t� 'tit 1CJ n1Drt11 Middle Access Drive 1068 1069 1069 1068 Soo � L 500 r— M 4W 300 zoo 01928 1929 100 0 1 -t t Data AMCL 1929 1928 ■ Page 8 Q 0 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 Time of Day PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 1096 1135 33 M O M .I V Access Drive - PM. Count 23 1936 1873 40 1173 1096 1 t� 'tit 1CJ n1Drt11 Middle Access Drive 1068 1069 1069 1068 Soo � L 500 r— M 4W 300 zoo 01928 1929 100 0 1 -t t Data AMCL 1929 1928 ■ Page 8 ' Middle Access Dr. Certrell Rd. CartreA Rd. -,; From NorthagM ■ From East -Right . From West-Thru Middle Access Dr C&*M Rd. Certre0 Rd. From North -Left From gM-TAY From West -Lett �4rlr. M 150 100 50 0 Time of Day 300 250 200 831 852 150 100 50 0 = ca 30 Chart 5 E 944 974 Noon Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive Chart 6 PM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and 20 _ Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive 1934 1954 -- Middle Access Drive ® Cartrell Rd. Certrell Rd. �l From N.Mi-Right From East-RIgM From West-Thru Middle Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Rd. From North -Left From East-Thru From West -Left N 400 E 300 200 100 0 IMMM 1 1 II �v- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time of Day QPETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 600 � 500 400 U 13 300 2o0 0 1363 1376 100 0 i Middle Access Dr. 878 831 1 - Noo Count Data 2:00 P 2:45 PM 947 944 Middle Access Drive 1965 1934 1 - P Count Data 05:00 05:45 PM �_.- s Cm 1366 1363 1 Page 9 .I. North West Access Dr'e Cerdrell Rd. Cardrei Rd - From North -Right From East -Right Fran VAYst-Thru West Access Drive Cerdrell Rd C-1,4 d From North -Left From East-Thru Fran WeY.•Left 600 600 400 m E 300 200 100 0 �I■I 1■IN�I 1 Q � Q Time of Day 600 600 400 300 200 100 0 Chart 7 AM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive West Access Drive 1068 1069 1068 1068 0 0 1 -AM Count Data rt 07:15 AM v 08:00 AM a �1928 1929 1928 1928 Chart 8 Noon Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive $44 882 West Access Dr. Cardrell Rd. JW Cardre0 Rd. From North -Right From East -Right From West-Thru ®West Access Dr Cerdrell Rd. ■ C*Ntai Rd. From North -Lett From East-Thru Flan Vhs!-Lett .y 300 300 260 200 E c 150 7 100 60 Time of Day ®PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC i 250 200 48 160 960 1008 100 50 r. 8 852 844 ■ n 1 - Noo Count Data M 12:00 PM., 12:45 PM X a Page 10 975 960 ■ .I. North 1,— J Dr cwerel Rd CaMreA Rd. ■WesLAceess From North-Rlght M From Ee^a-IgM ■ From Wesi-Thru Access Dr Cantrell Rd. Cordrall Rd. ■West From North -Left From East-Thru ■ From Wass -Left 600 - 600 400 m 2 300 200 RIX M 'cT O Of Q O O O O O O O Time of Day 600 600 400 300 200 100 0 m L Chart 9 PM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive 2032 2062 19 1374 1393 Dr 12 2044 2032 2 1376 1374 .I. North PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 11 The Trip Generation, an Informational Report (8th Edition), 2008, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and The Trip Generation Software (Version 6 by Mi- crotrans), were utilized in calculating the magnitude of traf- fic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed land - use of the retail development. These are reliable sources for this information and are universally used in the traffic engi- neering profession. Using the selected trip generation rates, calculations were made as a part of this study to provide a reliable estimate of traffic volumes that can be expected to be associated with the development as proposed. Applying the appropriate trip - generation rates to the land use proposed for this develop- ment makes these calculations. Results of this calculation are summarized on Table 1, "Summary of Trip -Generation." These calculations indicate that approximately 20 vehicle trips (combined in and out) are estimated to enter (12 trips) and exit (8 trips) during the traffic conditions of the AM pcak hour, approximately 57 vehicle trips are estimated to enter (28 trips) and exit (27 trips) during the traffic condi- tions of the noon peak hour and approximately 75 vehicle trips are estimated to enter (37 trips) and exit (38 trips) dur- ing the traffic conditions of the of the PM peak hour are pro- jected to be generated by the proposed retail development land use on this site. These data have been adjusted for "pass -by" trips (i.e. that portion of the site -destined traffic likely to come from the existing adjacent street traffic stream). Adjustments for "pass -by" were made with values consistent with docu- mented values found in Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, June, 2004. ITE does not provide pass -by calculations for the noon peak hour. Therefore, as a part of this study, the noon peak hour has been adjusted to assume 25 percent pass -by reduction. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 12 These calculations indicate that approximately 12 net new vehicle trips (combined in and out) are estimated during the traffic conditions of the AM peak hour, approximately 29 net new vehicle trips (combined in and out) are estimated during the traffic conditions of the noon peak hour and approxi- mately 49 net new vehicle trips are estimated during the traf- fic conditions of the of the PM peak hour are projected to be generated by the proposed retail land use on this site. These projected peak -hour volumes are very low compared to ex- isting on -street volumes during these peak hours on adjacent Cantrell Road (AHTD 2011 average daily traffic on Cantrell Road in the vicinity is 31,000 vehicles per day). These net new trips are expected to be only a one percent increase or less to the existing traffic volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM, noon and PM peak hours. This is comparable to a daily variance that could occur on Cantrell Road with exist- ing traffic conditions. Retail commercial traffic, as will be associated with site, or- dinarily contributes to the adjacent street traffic conditions during the on -street AM and PM peak traffic hours. Addi- tionally, as is typical in some retail developed areas, there are dining establishments in the vicinity. Accordingly, noon, as well as typical AM and PM peak traffic periods of the ad- jacent street are the traffic operating conditions have war- ranted primary traffic analysis as a part of this study. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 13 i . r r1 Pftrdry Table 1— Summary of Trip -Generation Summary of Pass -By Trips For 20.0 Th.Sq.Ft. GLA of Shopping Center Driveway Pass -By Volume Added to Volume Trip s Adjacent Streets Average Weekday 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 12 0 12 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 8 0 8 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 20 0 20 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 37 13 24 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 38 13 25 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 75 26 49 Pass-Bv Trios were calculatedon the basis of the following: Weekday A.M. Peak Period Average Pass -By Trip Percentage = 0 Weekday P.M. Peak Period Average Pass -By Trip Percentage = 34 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, June, 2004. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS Table 2 —Peak Hours Trip -Generation Net New Trips PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 14 Once projected traffic was estimated for the site, directional distributions were made to reflect the percent of anticipated left and right -turns at the study intersections. Directional dis- tribution percentages used in this study are shown on Figure 4, "Directional Distribution - Site Traffic." The directional distribution percentages for site traffic have been equated to percentage turns for each movement at the study intersec- tions. These values are shown on: ■ Figure 5, "Entering Traffic Percentage Turns" • Figure 6, "Exiting Traffic Percentage Turns." The projected traffic volumes shown on Figure 7, "Site - Generated Traffic Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hours," and Figure 7A, "Site -Generated Traffic Volumes - Noon Peak Hour," result from applying the projected entering and exiting percentages shown on Figures 5 and 6 to the corresponding projected site -generated traffic volumes summarized on Table 1, "Summary of Trip -Generation," and Table 2, "Trip - Generation Adjustments." These data for the proposed land use during the AM, noon and PM pcak hours have been ad- justed for "pass -by" trips (i.e. that portion of the site -destined traffic that could come from the existing adjacent street traffic stream). The site -generated traffic volumes shown on Figures 7 and 7A and corresponding existing background traffic volumes shown on Figures 3 and 3A have been combined and the re- sults are depicted on Figure 8, "Projected Traffic Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hours," and Figure 8A, "Projected Traffic Volumes - Noon Peak Hour." Traffic volumes shown on Fig- ures 8 and 8A are the values used in capacity and level of ser- vice calculations conducted as a part of this study for the full build -out projected traffic conditions. The effect of existing background traffic (i.e. the adjacent street non -site traffic which exists) and projected traffic associated with the site development have thus been accounted for in this analysis. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 15 rf i rr-- r`{:rrrrSr Generally, the "capacity" of a street is a measure of its ability to accommodate a certain magnitude of moving vehicles. It is a rate as opposed to a quantity, measured in terms of vehi- cles per hour. More specifically, street capacity refers to the maximum number of vehicles that a street element (e.g. an intersection) can be expected to accommodate in a given time period under the prevailing roadway and traffic condi- tions. Traffic operational analysis for the study intersections were evaluated based on the methodologies outlined in the High- way Capacity Manual, 2010 Edition, published by the Trans- portation Research Board. The operating conditions at an intersection are graded by the "level of service" experienced by drivers. Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic operating conditions and is rated from "A" to "F". LOS "A" represents the most desirable condition with free - flow movement of traffic with minimal delays. LOS "F" generally indicates congested conditions with considerable delays to motorists. Intermediate grades of B, C, D, and E reflect incremental increases in the average delay per stopped vehicle. Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. The table below shows the upper limit of vehicle delay asso- ciated with each level of service for signalized and un- signalized intersections. Intersection Level of Service Delay Thresholds Level of Service LOS Signalized Un-S4malized A < 10 Seconds < 10 Seconds B < 20 Seconds < 15 Seconds C < 35 Seconds < 25 Seconds D < 55 Seconds < 35 Seconds E < 80 Seconds < 50 Seconds F > 80 Seconds > 50 Seconds PETERS &ASSOCIATES 12 ENGINEERS, INC. Page 16 rr C r rr ri � �-r r: {:rr . �r The LOS rating deemed acceptable varies by community, facility type and traffic control device. A LOS "D" is the desirable goal for movements at un-signalized intersections that must yield to other movements; however, a LOS "E" or "F" is often accepted for low to moderate traffic volumes where the installation of a traffic signal is not warranted by the conditions at the intersection or the location is deemed undesirable for signalization for other reasons. For signal- ized intersections, level of service and average delay relate to all vehicles using the intersection. LOS "D" is the typical desirable standard for signalized intersections. All study intersections were evaluated using the Synchro analysis software package based on Highway Capacity Man- ual methods. This computer program has been proven to be reliable when used to analyze capacity and levels of traffic service under various operating conditions. Detailed results for all capacity calculations are included in the Appendix. The adjacent street weekday AM, noon and PM peak traffic periods were used for these calculations. Factors included in the analysis are as follows: • Existing traffic volumes and patterns. ■ Directional distribution of projected traffic volumes. ■ Existing and proposed intersection geometry (including elements such as turn lanes, curb radii, etc.). • Existing background traffic volumes and projected site - generated volumes for projected traffic conditions. • Existing or proposed traffic control. PETERS &ASSOCIATES F121 ENGINEERS. INC Page 17 CAPACITY ANALYSIS Level of Service Analysis Results Existing Trafc Conditions Capacity and level of service analysis was performed for existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic control for the AM, noon and PM peak hours for the following intersections: o Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive. As indicated in Table 2, "Level of Service Summary — Existing Traf- fic Conditions," all of the vehicle movements currently operate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS "D" or better for existing traffic conditions at the study intersections for the AM, noon and PM peak hours with existing traffic control except for the following: • The eastbound left -turn vehicle movements on Cantrell Road at the Cantrell Heights Existing Middle and West Access Drives (LOS "F") during the PM peak hour. • The southbound vehicles movements exiting the existing Cantrell Heights on Existing Middle Access Drive during the AM, noon and PM peak hours (LOS "F") and on Existing West Access Drive during the AM and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In In ° —L° $ w M 0 N C3 o a INTERSECTIONF m PEAK NO UR LEVEL OF = Cantrell Road and Andover Court/ AM A B A A B B B A Noon A A A A ] A A A A Cantrell Heights Epsting East Drive -;§ `°� PM A A A B B B B B Cantrell Road and AM B A A F F n/a Noon B A A F F n/a Cantrell Heights Epsbng Middle Drive a PM F A A F F n/a Cantrell Road and 4 2 B A A F F n/a Noon B A A C C n/asting Cantrell Heights EbWestDrioe �� PM 7 F A A F F n/a Table 2 - Level of Service Summary - Existing Traffic Conditions ENGINEERS, INC. Page 18 r:rr � rr� 1;�'rf S� Traffic volumes used for this analysis are shown on Fig- ure 3, "Existing Traffic Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hours," and Figure 3A, "Existing Traffic Volumes - Noon Peak Hour." It was observed that a -maximum of two vehicles were queued during the worst -case AM, noon and PM peak hours entering or exiting the at the Cantrell Heights Exist- ing Middle and West Access Drives. Projected Traffic Conditions Capacity and LOS analysis was performed for projected traffic conditions with the site as proposed for the AM, noon and PM peak hours for the following intersections: o Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Mid- dle Access Drive o Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive o Cantrell Road and the Proposed New Access Drive / Existing Office Access Drive o Cantrell Road and the Proposed New Right -Out Only Access Drive. Traffic volumes used for these projected traffic condi- tions are shown on Figure 8, "Projected Traffic Volumes - AM and PM Peak Hours," and Figure 8A, "Projected Traffic Volumes - Noon Peak Hour." The operating con- ditions projected to exist at the study intersections are summarized in Table 3, "Level of Service Summary - Projected Traffic Conditions." As indicated in Table 3, several vehicle movements for the projected traffic conditions at the study intersections are expected to operate at what calculates as an accept- able LOS "D" or better for the AM, noon and PM peak hours except for the following: PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 19 • The eastbound left -turn vehicle movements on Cantrell Road at the Cantrell Heights Existing Middle and West Access Drives (LOS "F") during the PM peak hour (this already occurs with existing traffic conditions). These volumes are low (only 13 vehicles at the Middle Access Drive and only 22 vehicles at the West Access Drive, which calculates to approximately only one vehicle every three minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher conflicting westbound volumes on Cantrell Road during the PM peak hour. Additionally, the projected 95th percentile queue length is expected to be only one vehicle at the Middle Access Drive and only 30 feet (one to two vehicles) at the West Access Drive. ♦ The southbound vehicles movements exiting the existing Cantrell Heights on Existing Middle Access Drive dur- ing the AM and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). This already occurs with existing traffic conditions. These volumes are low (only 2 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 22 vehicles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to approximately only one vehicle every three minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM and PM peak hours. Addi- tionally, the projected 95th percentile queue length is expected to be only one vehicle during the AM peak hour and only two to three vehicles during the PM peak hour on the Middle Access Drive at Cantrell Road. ♦ The southbound vehicles movements exiting the existing Cantrell Heights on Existing West Access Drive during the AM and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). This already occurs with existing traffic conditions. These volumes are low (only 3 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 38 vehicles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to approximately one vehicle every one to two minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM and PM peak hours. Addi- tionally, the projected 95th percentile queue length for this drive is expected to be only one vehicle during the AM peak hour and only two to three vehicles during the PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 20 rl r- I [ 1 r It: r` , �i PM peak hour on the West Access Drive at Cantrell Road. ♦ The eastbound left -turn vehicle movements on Cantrell Road at the Proposed New Access Drive (LOS "F") during the PM peak hour. This volume is low (only 25 vehicles, which calculates to approximately less than one vehicle every two minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher conflicting westbound volumes on Cantrell Road during the PM peak hour. Additionally, the projected 95th percentile queue length is expected to be only 34 feet (approximately two vehicle) at the Proposed New Access Drive. ♦ The northbound left -turn vehicle movements exiting the existing office building opposite the Proposed New Access Drive during the AM, noon and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). These volumes are low (only 5 vehicles during the AM peak hour, 20 vehicles during the noon peak hour and 30 vehicles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to a maximum of approximately one vehicle every two min- utes) and the delay is caused by the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM, noon and PM peak hours. ♦ The northbound thru / right -turn vehicles movements exit- ing the existing office building opposite the Proposed New Access Drive during the AM and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). These volumes are low (only 5 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 32 vehicles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to a maximum of approximately one ve- hicle every two minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM and PM peak hours. ♦ The southbound left -turn vehicle movements exiting the Proposed New Access Drive during the AM, noon and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). These volumes are low (only 4 vehicles during the AM peak hour, 13 vehicles during the noon peak hour and 17 vehicles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to a maximum of approximately one ve- hicle every three minutes) and the delay is caused by the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road during the AM, noon and PM peak hours. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 21 • The southbound thru / right -turn vehicles movements exiting the Proposed New Access Drive during the AM and PM peak hours (LOS "F"). These volumes are low (only 5 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 26 vehi- cles during the PM peak hour, which calculates to a maximum of approximately one vehicle every two min- utes) and the delay is caused by the much higher vol- umes on Cantrell Road during the AM and PM peak hours. r x _o N M N w IN W$ 3 S Z 2 p y � F c AM A B A A C C C A 5.9 65.0% Cantrell Road and Andover Court/ Noon A B A A A A A B 10.2 48.7% Cantrell Heights Ebsting East Drive �= PM A A A A j C C C A 8.2 69.8% B A A F F n/a 0.1 63.4% Cantrell Road and ¢ 2 ti0 — B tNoon B A i1," A B n!a 0.3 36.3% Cantrell Heights Epsting Middle Drive F A ;?H A F F n/a 63.2 u 64.8/ AM B A SS;ti:%' A F F n/a 0.1 63.4% Cantrell Road and 2 2 �O O Noon B A A C C n/a 0.8 40. 5% Cantrell Heights Epsting West Drive PM F A A F F n/a 103.7 66.9% Cantrell Road and AM 2? B A C A F F F F nla 3.6 65.3 % Noon B A B A F C F C n/a 1.9 42.4% Proposed New Access Drive / �� O Office Access Drive y PM F A B A F I F F F n/a N/A 72.5% A ;F, 4;#9° A B n/aL57.9% Cantrell Road and ¢ Noon �� A A B n/a35.0% Proposed New Right -Out Access Drive uPM A °° 'k A B nla67.9 /o Table 3 - Level of Service Summary - Projected Traffic Conditions �112 PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 22 Vehicle queuing is projected to easily be accommodated within the site. Additionally, occasional gaps on Cantrell Road are created by the existing traffic signal at Cantrell Road and Andover Court which helps minimize delay at the Cantrell Heights driveways delay along Cantrell Road. For these projected traffic conditions, analysis was con- ducted with the following assumed: o Existing lane geometry and traffic signal control at the intersection of Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive. o Existing lane geometry on Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing Middle Access Drive. o Existing lane geometry on Cantrell Road and Cantrell Heights Existing West Access Drive. o Minor Cantrell Road widening for eastbound traffic to allow for width sufficient for modifications to pavement markings on the west leg of the Cantrell Road and the Proposed New Access Drive intersection to accommo- date the addition of an eastbound left -turn lane. o The Proposed New Access Drive constructed to serve as the north leg of the existing Cantrell Road and existing office access drive and constructed to consist of an out- bound left -turn lane, an outbound thru / right -turn lane and an inbound receiving lane. laPETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 23 j f r I tr As a part of this re -zoning for the proposed retail develop- ment, there are some other items related that are as follows: o There is an existing liquor store (Sullivan's Liquor) lo- cated on the northwest corner of Cantrell Road and An- dover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive as depicted on the photo below. As a part of the proposed new development, the liquor store would relo- cate to vacant space at the west end of the existing Cantrell Heights shopping center and the existing build- ing the liquor store is currently in would be removed to allow for better alignment of the driveway north leg at the signal controlled intersection of Cantrell Road and Andover Court. This improved driveway alignment will better accommodate egress from both the front and rear parking areas and will provide a longer area for vehicle queuing within the site. It will also facilitate ingress and egress for vehicles from the proposed new retail devel- opment which will be connected through the existing shonninLy center. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC Page 24 Widen this area to allow for needed transition taper (approximately 200 linear r feet) : x N PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC o There is existing pavement striped out along the south side of Cantrell Road between the existing office building access drive (opposite the site) and Reservoir Park Road (to the west). This additional roadway width on Cantrell Road could be utilized to accommodate the addition of an eastbound left -turn lane at the Proposed New Access Drive opposite the existing office build- ing access drive. A pavement transition taper of approximately 200 linear feet preceding Reservoir Park Road would be needed to align with the striped out un-used area along the south side of Cantrell Road, on the east side of Reservoir Park Road as shown below. If these improvements are constructed, it would allow site -generated vehicles from the west to be afforded a left -turn lane and thus not impede eastbound thru vehicles on Cantrell Road. Also, the City plans to install an additional traf- fic signal approximately 0.6 mile west of the site of the pro- posed site at the intersection of Cantrell Road and Robinwood Drive that will facilitate entry and exit form the Robinwood subdivision and create more gaps in the traffic stream along Cantrell Road. - Cantre/1 4 N V Q Page 25 Findings of this study are summarized as follows: For the development as proposed, approximately 12 net new vehicle trips (combined in and out) are estimated during the traffic conditions of the AM peak hour, approximately 29 net new vehicle trips (combined in and out) are estimated during the traffic conditions of the noon peak hour and approximately 49 net new vehicle trips are estimated during the traffic conditions of the of the PM peak hour are projected to be generated by the proposed retail land use on this site. These projected peak -hour volumes are very low compared to exist- ing on -street volumes during these peak hours on adjacent Cantrell Road (AHTD 2011 average daily traffic on Cantrell Road in the vi- cinity is 31,000 vehicles per day). These net new trips are expected to be only a one percent increase or less to the existing traffic vol- umes on Cantrell Road during the AM, noon and PM peak hours. This is comparable to a daily variance that could occur on Cantrell Road with existing traffic conditions. Capacity and level of service analysis was performed for existing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic control for the AM, noon and PM peak hours for the study intersections. All of the vehicle movements currently operate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS "D" or better for existing traffic conditions at the study intersections for the AM, noon and PM peak hours with existing traffic control ex- cept for certain inbound and outbound driveway volumes at the Cantrell Heights Existing Middle and West Access Drives which ex- perience delay due to the high volumes on Cantrell Road. However, it was observed that a maximum of two vehicles were queued during the worst -case AM, noon and PM peak hours entering or exiting the at the Cantrell Heights Existing Middle and West Access Drives. • Capacity and LOS analysis was performed for projected traffic condi- tions with the site as proposed for the AM, noon and PM peak hours for the study intersections. All vehicle movements for the projected traffic conditions at the study intersections are expected to operate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS "D" or better for the AM, noon and PM peak hours with projected traffic volumes except for certain inbound and outbound driveway volumes at the Cantrell Heights Ex- isting Middle and West Access Drives and the proposed new access PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 26 i #-arr sz:(m sr drive which experience delay due to the much higher volumes on Cantrell Road. A LOS "D" is the desirable goal for movements at un-signalized intersections that must yield to other move- ments; however, a LOS "E" or "F" is often accepted for low to moderate traffic volumes where the installation of a traffic signal is not warranted by the conditions at the intersection or the loca- tion is deemed undesirable for signalization for other reasons (which is the case at these locations). Additionally, projected 95th percentile queue length is expected to be only be a maxi- mum of two to three vehicles at these locations. • There is an existing liquor store (Sullivan's Liquor) located on the northwest corner of Cantrell Road and Andover Court / Cantrell Heights Existing East Access Drive. As a part of the proposed new development, the liquor store would relocate to vacant space at the west end of the existing Cantrell Heights shopping center and the existing building the liquor store is cur- rently in would be removed to allow for better alignment of the driveway north leg at the signal controlled intersection of Cantrell Road and Andover Court. This improved driveway alignment will better accommodate egress from both the front and rear parking areas and will provide a longer area for vehicle queuing within the site. It will also facilitate ingress and egress for vehicles from the proposed new retail development which will be connected through the existing shopping center. • There is existing pavement striped out along the south side of Cantrell Road between the existing office building access drive (opposite the site) and Reservoir Park Road (to the west). This additional roadway width on Cantrell Road could be utilized to accommodate the addition of an eastbound left -turn lane at the Proposed New Access Drive opposite the existing office build- ing access drive. A pavement transition taper preceding Reser- voir Park Road would be needed to align with the striped out un- used area along the south side of Cantrell Road, on the east side of Reservoir Park Road. If these improvements are constructed, it would allow site -generated vehicles from the west to be af- forded a left -turn lane and thus not impede eastbound thru vehi- cles on Cantrell Road. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS. INC. Page 27 Ifs $Zftrrf �r Recommendations of this study are summarized as follows: • As a part of the proposed new development, it is recom- mended that once the liquor store is relocated to vacant space at the west end of the existing Cantrell Heights shopping cen- ter and the existing liquor store building is removed, the re- alignment of the driveway north leg of the intersection of Cantrell Road and Andover Court should be made to afford greater on -site vehicle queuing at the existing traffic signal. It is recommended that the existing pavement striped out along the south side of Cantrell Road between the existing office building access drive (opposite the site) and Reservoir Park Road (to the west) be utilized to accommodate the addi- tion of an eastbound left -turn lane at the Proposed New Ac- cess Drive opposite the existing office building access drive. A pavement widening transition taper of approximately 200 linear feet preceding Reservoir Park Road would be needed to align with the striped out un-used area along the south side of Cantrell Road, on the east side of Reservoir Park Road. ■ The proposed new access drive opposite the existing office building access drive intersection and the proposed right -out only access drive must conform to AHTD and City of Little Rock design standards and will require approval by AHTD and the City. PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Page 28 PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. 0 U)U) z w �' z H L(e) Q NM fn5OD rD XJ2,� Y w O> Q N u� U W o a y (9Z) 0 i T1 49) Lz L.L W Q d (b) L G (b) L H z Q 2 (9L) L u u (L9) 9L 0- � M Q W L W CANTRELL HEIGHTS r EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. co a co �+ o � r �u CANTRELL HEIGHTS MIDDLE ACCESS DR. C W O c (ozi) L u o \� a T > j Mm = y Z CD=p� izi _ U U coNn/ o < w CANTRELL HEIGHTS u J Q O U WEST z a W Z O ACCESS DR, U a W o fT J Q J w z w J �Z� ti a Uz coJ s) L u Q b � � 1 � � �2 I r W uj W /I— v) U] W F U O ul ul � U �z v� a N fx w a�WZ O N W Z f ��1 W M NORTH 0 C7(1)tY ZLLI=Iz O WQ Q co � 2 =M X J Y 000 v W O W a LL Z LJJ v 0 T �£ 11�s QO n a Z 0 z� G£ 0 Z a 9 u u E£ n=> U M O co O co CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. It 00 � G u a £ CANTRELL HEIGHTS m MIDDLE ACCESS DR. U o r �z 11 0 _ ~ Q U) 0 It _ Q o �� Q CANTRELL HEIGHTSLU W O 0 O WEST Of ACCESS DR. U � z J� s�TT �Q Z W 0 J Z I— U Uza� ss u U ao O L w U) w U O ul ul � z v� x N a w w a�Wz z cq W .. NORTH 0 Q IL 0 z U o O li z H LL w� F- LU `rn L VJ 'r^ ❑ VJ O F U lu CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. CANTRELL HEIGHTS MIDDLE ACCESS DR. o _o = Q�fQ _ z W O W Q of J Qom CANTRELL HEIGHTS W �Z WEST ACCESS DR. U W � woui - Z�z� Uza� U PROPOSEa NEW ACCESS D!q W H Cn ry f W NEW RfGul HTPROPOSE (RESERVOIR PARK RD. 0 OUT ONL d U ACCESS � w N R; w CO W z a C, Z N 1 � "' i . \� w r NOR�a 0 a _ U U) E: Z z L w� Q Z O LL e L 0 W G C� 0 a Gu Z< V V Z m a W W m Q Z 13 W W iv IL m � re b W S a q V vA C c �; CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. m CANTRELL HTS C3 MIDDLE ACCESS Lo a _o U co Z co 0 _ _ Q a �o a a J W LU ¢ > Y Lo CANTRELL HEIGHTS z o W 0 Z 0 WEST ACCESS OR. ¢ W o if)o ~ J J z Z H Uz¢J U PROP NE OSED W ACCESS OR. w 1-- s 2 w q E-� Q U NEW RIGHT p 0 -r ONLy L❑ 3 ACCESS d z DR, n � N a W w �1 aCe)wz o Z r Ln W c; LLI NORTli v O a o _ U U) Z L it CO x S2 W o U' Q Z � a ~ a %4 4 X W a r LLJ U v a � W � a a c m r m n ti o M c M m V CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. CANTRELL H TS t MIDDLE ACCESS d ^ u � _ C720Z a w °� 1T � a J SOU o CANTRELL HEIGHTS %oc 11 W O o 0 WEST ACCESS DR, U Q W a ~~ J J ro %Sti ii z Z ~ C)za� � a U R NEW PROpOSED ACCESS DR. W � m � (n ° \ w 0 O NEW RJG PROppSED 0 Hr Dur ONLY d ACCESS DF� o v2 a � II II N a zw a %Sfi +i CO E- LZr lam W z a pNG, W -- F- .tr4. W � NORTH ci 0 Q _L., a o -- cu (Z) L (Z) L u ` NORTH co o (9) Z s � M M ` 7 CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. CANTRELL H TS MIDDLE ACCESS _o QN w Gu CANTRELL HEIGHTS WEST ACCESS DR. ¢ U o cu) s u o �n 1N C POSED NEW PRO� .. AcCES❑R. W H U) NEW RIG PROPOSE] . HT --OUT ONLY Oftfti6ADR. n (s 0 e bCL 0 ❑ c) (A I�W W zj0 J =�f` w W O Q W uj LL < d H ❑ z Q Q 0 z w �0� = w Q J Q O U W Of Z O ~ w ❑ � Z z H U zaJ U W v 0 ul ul dz d v� M x N a �2 p N Pi W z U M OH cl� Q d 0 ❑(/) O� LU 0 W0LuQ a C7 LL z0< �r u wiw Z u w EL- m Qo m a Z _ a = 0 r d o CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. ANDOVER CT. CANTRELL H HTS r MIDDLE ACCESS R _ _ �- Ur =�Z O oa oLU CANrRE w w J U1LHEIGHTS QOc WEST ACCESSDR. d w°❑OZ <Z sn rr j ❑ J n/ 0 Q Q a U J 9 e ro Q �n NE PROPOSED W ACCE55 pR U 4 o = W I— Z NEw RIGHT OpOSED ' a 0 ACCES�NR 2 d p 0� u W a n a�wz N W a - p z �-� my U A di NORTH1 1 a 0 ; r` - rj rr ` NORM' G 7 M � 0 M 00 r M N M zu Gn N N 00 N M CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. CANTRELL HM MIDDLE ACCESS 0 cc CANTRELLjWEST AC NEW PROPOSED ACCESS DR. W I— U) NEW RIGH PROPOSED. OUT ONLY ACCESS DR. ► 9 a. v OD N m o M u=> (176) Z i 49) LZ (b) 6 = G (4) L (96) l u u M) 9l G �=> O A M O M U� 0) ap O � O ANDOVER CT. M O C. o� u=> a (ll) h (T (ZS) 9 o o= Go 0 (L6) 9 4 � (00 9 0 �=> M :7 v O N 7 w' (c0 v u O N to 0 u a O co co LU U) d ? O cr oo w J = LL O Q aUa LL a d ~ Z a a 0 Z w � O _ = w ¢ J ¢ O U W 00O Z F— J Z W wZ�- Uz¢ U lz u NORTH o v 00 O N M L0 0) a) r° Iq M 00 v c 64 69 a a z=> G£ a 0 z° 9 u u 8£ C fc M aD � � M CANTRELL HEIGHTS EAST ACCESS DR. CANTRELL HE % MIDDLE ACCESS _o 2 0 CANTRELL HEIGHTS WEST ACCESS ❑R. ¢ U � PROPOSED NEW ACCESS DR. W F-- NEW RIG PROPOSED HT O[17` ONLY A S DR. 1 ANDOVER CT. OL u COco co N N G u=> 6 zz O= O Oz G �=> �2 W N un 0 rn u U U) Of F-2OLQ n -J poo OW a U � Z H O 0 QO�UQ _ ::) z W ==W< J Q O U W 000 �wQW Q�Q� U z U PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. PETERS & ASSOCIATES RNCINRRRS. INC. P1612 Cantrell Heights Little Rock, AR Trip Generation TOTAL ENTERING + EXITING NOON PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIPS ENTER EXIT 28 29 57 P1612 Cantrell Heights Proposed Shopping Center Summary of Average Vehicle Trip Generation For 20.0 Th.Sq.Ft. GLA of Shopping Center March 11, 2013 24 Hour 7-9 AM Pk Hour 4-6 PM Pk Hour Two -Way Volume Enter Exit Enter Exit Average Weekday 859 12 8 37 38 24 hour Peak Hour Two -Way Volume Enter Exit Saturday 999 51 47 Sunday 505 31 32 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS P1612 Cantrell Heights Proposed Shopping Center Summary of Pass -By Trips For 20.0 Th.Sq.Ft. GLA of Shopping Center March 11, 2013 Driveway Volume Pass -By Trips volume Added to Adjacent Streets Average Weekday 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 12 0 12 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 8 0 8 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 20 0 20 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 37 13 24 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 38 13 25 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 75 26 49 Saturday Saturday Peak Hour Enter 51 13 38 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 47 12 35 Saturday Peak Hour Total 98 25 73 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Pass -By Trips were calculated on the basis of the following: Weekday P.M. Peak Period Pass -By Trip Percentage = 34 Saturday Midday Pk. Pd. Pass -By Trip Percentage = 26 Number of Pass -By Studies:100 for Weekday PM PK PD and 11 for Saturday. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, June, 2004. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS a) Fmo cj i PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENCINRRRS, INC. Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : AM-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Littlel Rock, AR Start Date : 02/06/2013 P-1612 Page No :1 Groups Printed- AM Count Data Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Andover Court Cantrell Rd. From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App. App' Right Thru Left App. Int. Total Total Right Thru Left Total Total Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0.1 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 1 1.01 1.01 1.0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 168 4 0 4 8 2 346 0 348 524 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 182 1 183 10 0 6 16 1 445 0 446 645 07:30 AM 1 1 0 2 1 251 3 255 2 1 2 5 2 530 1 533 795 07:45 AM 0 0 0 01 1 333 6 3401 5 0 5 10 3 458 2 463 813 Total 1 1 0 2 2 934 10 946 21 1 17 39 8 1779 3 1790 2777 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 294 4 298 10 0 2 12 12 472 2 486 796 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 184 16 200 13 0 2 15 10 346 2 358 573 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 181 8 189 11 0 6 17 10 424 0 434 640 08:45 AM 0 0_ 0 0 0 246 10 256 10 0 5 15 10 321 0 331 : 602 Total 0 0 0 0 4 905 38 943 ' 44 0 15 59 1 42 15a3 4 16C9 1 26 ` Grand Total 1 1 0 2 2 1839 48 1889 65 1 32 98I 50 3342 7 3399 5388 Apprch % 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.1 97.4 2.5 66.3 1.0 32.7 j 1.5 98.3 0.2 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 0.9 35.1 1.2 0.0 0.6 1.8 0.9 62.0 0.1 63.1 Access Drive Out In Total 10 2 12 1 1 0 Pj ht Thru Left 1 �► wr W p N T �() Nortlt IU -/ 137:00:QOAM m 13 8:45:00 AM oMount Data rP, 0 N W - Left Tfiru Right 32 99 98 197 Out In Total rt Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : AM-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Littlel Rock, AR Start Date : 02/06/2013 P-1612 Page No :2 Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Andover Court Cantrell Rd. From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Opp' Right Thru Left App. Right Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 _ Intersection 07:15 AM Volume 1 1 0 2 2 1060 14 1076 27 1 15 43 18 1905 5 1928 3049 Percent 50.0 50.0 00 0.2 98.5 1.3 62.8 2.3 34.9 0.9 98.8 0.3 07.45 0 0 0 0 1 333 6 340 5 0 5 10 3 458 2 463 813 Volume Peak Factor 0.938 High Int. 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM Volume 1 1 0 2 1 333 6 340 10 0 6 16 2 530 1 533 Peak Factor 0.250 0.791 0.672 0.904 Aomss Drive out In Total ® 2 10 1 1 D 4 Fm LnLam, W� t North I\7 N 0to Q w t� 13 7.16,ODAM a S m ~ 13 8:00:00 AM 0 0 AIM Data a o 0 om w— T r Left Thru Ri ht 15 1 27 33 43 76 Out In Total And V IXM Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : No-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/12/2013 P-1612 Page No : 1 _ Groups Printed- Noon Count Data Access Drive I Cantrell Rd. Andover Court Cantrell Rd. Frn�� m KI-Fh Frnm F.c+ Frnm q-i+h Frnm Wos+ start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left App Right Thru Left Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1 1.01 1.01 1.01 1 1.01 1.01 1.01 1 1.01 1.01 1 1.0 1.01 1.0 12:00 PM 1 i 3 6 3 197 10 21 U V 1 i3 i8 4 210 U [ 14 441 12:15 PM 0 0 9 9 3 197 19 219 15 0 9 24 9 231 1 241 493 12:30 PM 4 0 8 12 6 202 8 216 21 0 9 30 12 216 1 229 487 12:45 PM 1 1 11 13 5 238 9 252 16 61 2 3 12 38 30 1021 9 34 253 910 1 3 263 947 558 Total 6 2 31 391 17 834 46 897 1985 Grand Total 6 2 31 39 17 834 46 897 61 3 38 102 34 910 3 947 1985 Apprch % 15.4 5.1 79.5 1.9 93.0 5.1 59.8 I 2.9 37.3 3.6 96.1 0.3 Total % 0.3 0.1 1.6 2.0 0.9 42.0 2.3 45.2 3.1 0.2 1.9 5.1 1.7 45.8 02 47.7 Dnve Out In Total 23 ®F 62 6 I 21 81 -�VN r I �I q North V n a Y vtF� IIJ12/201312:00:00PM �00„ C >J12/201312:45:00 PM a �+ v _ U . m " L Noon Count Data m O + ��A wa m °- �tw Right 1 381 31 611 82 102 184 Out in Total Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : No-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/12/2013 P-1612 Page No :2 Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Andover Court Cantrell Rd. I From North From East From South From West _ Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int Total Total Total_ Total ak Hour From 12.00 PM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 12:00 PM Volume 6 2 31 39 17 834 46 897 61 3 38 102 34 910 3 947 1985 Percent 15.4 5.1 79.5 1.9 93.0 5.1 59.8 2.9 37.3 3.6 96.1 0.3 12:45 1 1 11 13 5 238 9 252 16 2 12 30 9 253 1 263 558 Volume Peak Factor 0.889 High Int. 12:45 PM 12:45 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM l Volume 1 1 11 13 5 238 9 252 21 0 9 30, 9 253 1 263 Peak Factor 0.750. 0.890 0.8501 0.9001 Aomss Orive Out In Total 23 62 6 2 31 �U) r z o� J NO th Lin a) roc ' m r� 121201312:1)(MPM — 0 m 5w m ~ 2l2013 12:45:00 PM � oon CoW Data N o� 1- -w Left Thru r 38 3 61 ® 102 184 Out In Total Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : PM-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/04/2013 P-1612 Page No : 1 Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Andover Court Cantrell Rd. From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App. Right Thru Left App. Int. Total I Total Total Total Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 04:00 PM 2 0 4 6 7 338 5 350 11 1 10 22 10 204 1 215 593 04:15 PM 2 0 4 6 2 325 13 340 11 0 17 28 8 254 1 263 637 04:30 PM 4 1 5 10 7 463 8 478 15 2 13 30 7 269 2 278 796 04:45 PM 3 0 8 11 7 451 15 473 17 2 16 35 5 255 2 262 781 Total 11 1 21 33 23 1577 41 1641 54 5 56 115 30 982 6 1018 2807 05:00 PM 3 3 9 15 7 526 10 543 12 0 14 26 8 287 1 296 880 05:15 PM 5 0 4 9 2 433 7 442 7 0 18 25 13 285 1 299 775 05:30 PM 0 1 5 6 5 369 11 385 10 1 15 26 10 233 0 243 660 05:45 PM 0 0 13 13 8 305 10 323 6 _0 6 12 9 220 1 230 578 Total 8 A 31 43 22 1633 38 1693 35 1 53 89 40 1025 3 1068 2893 Grand Total 19 5 52 76 45 3210 79 3334 89 6 109 204 70 2007 9 2086I 5700 Apprch % 25.0 6.6 68.4 1.3 96.3 2.4 43.6 2.9 53.4 3.4 96.2 0.4 Total % 0.3 0.1 0.9 1.3 0.8 56.3 1.4 58.5 1.6 0.1 1.9 3.6 1.2 35.2 0.2 36.6 Access Orive Out In Total ® 76 ,36 19 _5 Left N F� T ?O North a 00 -• cn d SIV51 ?I � OL� n1134:00:00 PM 4I20,3 5:45:00 PM 2 e' O m E + PM Count Data N O cats Thru nt 6 15a 204 Out In Total er Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : PM-Ando Cantrell Road and Andover Court Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/04/2013 P-1612 Page No : 2 Access Drive From North Right Thru Left App' Right' Cantrell From Thru Rd. East Left App' Right Andover From Thru Court South Left App' Right Cantrell Rd. From West Thru Left App. Int. Start Time Total Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM I Volume 15 4 26 45 23 1873 40 1936 51 4 61 116 33 1096 6 1135 3232 Percent 33.3 8.9 57.8 1.2 96.7 2.1 44.0 3.4 52.6 2.9 96.6 0.5 05:00 3 3 9 15 7 526 10 543 12 0 14 26 8 287 1 296 880 Volume Peak Factor 10.918 High Int. 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:15 PM Volume 3 3 9 15 7 526 10 543 17 2 16 35' 13 285 1 299 Peak Factor 0.750 0.891 0.829 0.949 ACaeSS Drive Out In Total 33 45 L78 15 4 26 R hi Thru 1 L+ CO cp T o ~qnm North �� r °J R: w Ol c24=134:3:ODPM 4-1 �35:15:00 PM`� Loy— Pm Cwnt Data m a w 0 � i ;7 0 om m— � rn 81 4 51 77 116 193 Out In Total Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : AM -East Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/06/2013 P-1612 Page No : 1 Grouos Printed- AM Count Data Middle Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Rd. From North From East From West Start Time Right Left I App. Total Right Thru App. Total Thru Left App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.01 1.01 1.0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 172 172 346 0 346 518 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 186 186 446 0 446 632 07:30 AM 0 0 0 1 253 254 533 0 533 787 07:45 AM 1 0 1 0 333 463 1 464 798 _ Total 1 0 1 1 944 _333 9451 1788 1 1789 T 2735 08:00 AM 0 1 1 0 296 296 486 0 486 783 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 168 168 358 0 358 526 08:30 AM 0 0 0 1 186 187 434 1 435 622 08:45 AM 0 0 0 1 250 251 331 0 331 582 Total 0 1 1 2 900 902 1609 1 1610 2513 Grand Total 1 1 2 3 1844 1847 3397 2 3399 5248 Apprch % 50.0 50.0 0.2 99.8 99.9 0.1 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 35.1 35.2 64.7 0.0 64.8 (Addle Access Drive out In Total 0 2 0 1 1 Right Left v °v w FCN 1 O C North w '7 m 01 J —r, 137:00,WAM a _ c w 2 13 8:45:00 AM LO)M v AM Catxit Della O °r ° � m 0 0 0 Out In Total Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : AM -East Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/06/2013 P-1612 Page No :2 Middle Access Drive From North Cantrell Rd. From East Cantrell Rd. From West 1 Start Time I Right I Left , App. Total Right I Thruj App. Total Thru Left Lkp2. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 AM Volume 1 1 2 1 1068 1069 1928 1 19291 3000 Percent 50.0 50.0 0.1 99.9 99.9 0.1 07:45 Volume 1 0 1 0 333 333 463 1 464 798 Peak Factor 0.940 High Int. 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 07:30 AM Volume 1 0 1 0 333 333 533 0 533 Peak Factor 0.500 0.803 0 905 mddieAwesgOnva Out In Total _2 2 1 1 �ht 4 ~ N NortO h a r m t-2. m`r 137.16,00AM CD, 5ie Z t2 13 8:00:00 AM 4 7 a m — 20 w c°o AIM Qata N 011 mm w— Out In Total Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 Groups Printed- Noon Count Data _ Middle Access Dr, Cantrell Rd. From North From East Start Time Right I Left I App. Total Right I Thru I A22. Total Thru Factor 1.0 j 1.01 1.0 1 1.01 1.0 12:00 PM 6 1 7 18 242 260 300 12:15 PM 4 0 4 12 277 289 290 12:30 PM 5 1 6 11 320 331 297 12:45 PM 6 1 7 6 336 342 : 283 Total 21 3 24 47 1175 1222 1170 Grand Total 21 3 241 47 1175 12221 1170 Apprch % 87.5 12.5 I 3.8 96.2 1 97.5 Total % 0.9 0.1 1.0 1.9 48.0 50.0 47.8 File Name : NO -East Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/14/2013 Page No : 1 Cantrell Rd. From West Left Apo_. Total Int. Total i 1.0 10 310 577 9 299 592 7 304 641 4 287 636 30 12001 2446 30 1200� 2446 2.5 1.2 49.1 h4 tdle Access Or. Out In Total 77 24 1 101 211 3 Right Left �to �N T Do North v ��a .p G n, v V w m@ 142PM 1�42130 PM 4—: w 1Voon Count DWa N O ^ m fit _ Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 File Name NO -East Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/14/2013 Page No : 2 r From 12:00 PM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 12:00 PM 1 Volume 21 3 24 47 1175 1222 1170 30 1200 Percent 87.5 12.5 3.8 96.2 97.5 2.5 12:30 Volume 5 1 6 11 320 331 297 7 304 Peak Factor 0.954 High Int. 12:00 PM 12:45 PM 12:00 PM Volume 6 1 7 6 336 342 300 10 310 Peak Factor 0.857 0.893 0.968 Middle A=� Or. out In Total 77fl 1 101 21 3 Right Left to oN T �O North � � Q ram„ m �--m [7 m n a �4 — 141201312:00;00 PM ro F—� 14J201312:45:00PM � ^� sn j rn Neon CourR L�3t9 N 0 O� w c0 N cn — 2446 641 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 r;rnnnc Printers- PM Count n;;ta File Name : PM -East Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/13/2013 Page No : 1 Middle Access Drive From North Cantrell Rd. From East Cantrell Rd. From West Start Time Right Left j App. Total Right Thru I App. Total Thru Left I App. Total Int. Total Factor 1 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 3 1 4 1 4 5 2 3 395 411 397 414 277 305 6 5 283 310 684 729 Total 7 2 9 5 806 811 582 11 5931 1413 05:00 PM 6 1 7 4 456 460 323 4 3271 794 05:15 PM 5 1 6 8 527 535 382 3 385 926 05:30 PM 4 0 4 9 522 531 332 2 334 869 05:45 PM 5 1 6 10 429 439 326 4 330 775 Total 7.0 3 23 1363 13 1376 3364 31 1934 1965 06:00 PM 6 2 8 8 344 352 243 3 246 f 606 06:15 PM 4 1 5 7 360 367 268 3 271 643 Grand Total 37 8 45 51 3444 3495 2456 30 2486 6026 Apprch % 82.2 17.8 1.5 98.5 98.8 1.2 Total % 0.6 0.1 0.7 0.8 57.2 58.0 40.8 0.5 41.3 Middle Access Drive Out in Total B78 i2B 37 S 4 r- �L eft North C pp 13f201$ 4:30:00 PM Uv 2 3,2013 6:15:00 PM M. Count OM 1 O ��i can o m— Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : PM -East Cantrell Road and Middle Access Drive Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/13/2013 P-1612 Page No : 2 Middle Access Drive Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Rd. From North From East From West Start Time I Right Left I App. Total Right Thru I App. Total I Thru - Left App. Total Int. Total our From 04*30 PM to 06.15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 20 3 23 31 1934 1965 1363 13 1376 3364 Percent 87.0 13.0 1.6 98.4 99.1 0.9 05:15 Volume 5 1 6. 8 527 535 382 3 385. 926 Peak Factor 0.908 High Int. 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 1 05:15 PM Volume 6 1 7 8 527 535 382 3 385 Peak Factor 0.821 0.918 0.894 Middle Access Drive Out in Total ® 23 67 20 3 Right l.eR p 1 �O I rn� North 9-1 F �+ G1312013 5,0 w PM A a r m 2 13I26t3 5:45:00 PM n LO PM Count DzU 0 , �m Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 Factor 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Total 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM West Access Drive From North ht Left 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 1 Grand Total 2 Apprch % 66.7 Total % 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 1 33.3 0.0 File Name : AM -West Site Code 00000000 Start Date : 02/06/2013 Page No : 1 Printed- AM Count Data _2roqps Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Ri From East From We: Total Right Thru App. Total Thru Left 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 0 0 172 172 346 0 0 0 186 186 446 0 1 0 253 253 533 1 0 0 333 333 463 0 1 0 944 9" 1788 1 0 0 296 296 486 0 0 0 168 168 358 0 1 0 186 186 434 0 1 1 250 251 331 _ 1 2 1 900 901 1609 1 3I 1 1844 18451 3397 2 0.1 99.9 99.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 35.1 35.2 64.7 0.0 West AOMS [Mve Out In Total 0© 2 t Right Left u� North * °D y r—� 138:45:00AM �c �w a a A j AM CQ11rd t]�t$ . O o A p) W - 3461 518 446 632 534 788 463 _ 796 1789 2734 486 782 358 526 434 621 _ 3321 584 16101 2513 3399I 5247 64.8 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 West Access Drive From North Start Time I Right Left Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 AM Volume 1 0 Percent 100.0 0.0 07:45 Volume 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM Volume 1 0 Peak Factor File Name : AM -West Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/06/2013 Page No : 2 Cantrell Rd. From East I Cantrell Rd. From West Total Right I Thru I App. Total I Thru I Left 1 0 1068 1068� 1928 1 0.0 100.0 99.9 0.1 0 0 333 333 463 0 07:45 AM 07:30 AM 1 0 333 333 533 1 0.250 0.802 Wes[ Access Onve Out In Total 1 0 Flight Left ro p N 1 N O North °D 'g - fij Imp a r� 0137:15:00AM m'ti13 8:00:0O AM +—c MAC, Urd data R Cp N 0 �m W Total I Int. Total 19291l2998 463 796 0.942 I 534 0.903 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : NO -West Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Site Code : 00000000 Little Rock, AR Start Date : 02/14/2013 P-1612 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Noon Count Data West Access Dr. Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Rd. From North From East From West Start Time Right Left App. Total R_Lqht Thru App. Total Thru Left App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 12:00 PM 8 0 8 3 245 248 300 13 313 569 12:15 PM 10 4 14 2 275 277 295 16 311 602 12:30 PM 9 6 15 1 324 325 291 9 300 640 12:45 PM 11 5 16 2 335 337 282 10 292 645 Total 38 15 531 8 1179 1187 1168 48 1216 2456 Grand Total 38 15 53 8 1179 11871 1168 48 1216 2456 Apprch % 71.7 28.3 0.7 I 99.3 96.1 3.9 Total % 1.5 0.6 2.2 0.3 48.0 48.3 47.6 2.0 49.5 West Access Or. out In Total ®53 F-1091 38 15 PJ IM 4 O N W North � � n m e 1=1312:00:00PM OD3 m 9tT d 14/201312:45:00 PM + c M n �� fmoon Count Data O N v N O - Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data Noon Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 West Access Dr. Cantrell Rd. _ From North From East Start Time Right j Left I App. Total Right Thru Peak Hour From 12:00 PM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 12:00 PM Volume 38 15 53 8 1179 Percent 71.7 28.3 0.7 99.3 12:45 Volume 11 5 16 2 335 Peak Factor High Int. 12:45 PM 12:45 PM Volume 11 5 16 2 335 Peak Factor 0.828 File Name : NO -West Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/14/2013 Page No : 2 Cantrell Rd. From West _ App. Total Thru Left _ App. Total Int. Total 1187 1168 48 1 12161 2456 96.1 3.9 337 282 10 292 645 0.952 12:00 PM 337 300 13 313 0.881 I 0.971 West r. Out In Total 5109 38 15 m L+ �N T P-6. th tz C7 m 1=1312'ZoPM ccn �e m14l201312:45:00PM � � �4 F a 5 `' Noon L:OVnt Data on N O Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 Cymi inc Printaei-Pm C:rnint Data File Name : PM -West Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/13/2013 Page No : 1 Start Time West Access Dr From North Cantrell Rd. From East Cantrell Rd. From West_ Right I Left I App. Total giVNT Thru App. Total Thru Left A . Total lnt. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 9 8 0 0 9 8 6 7 393 408 399 415 283 310 3 3 286 313 694 736 Total 17 0 171 13 801 814 593 6 599 1430 05:00 PM 10 1 11 1 5 547 552 326 4 330 893 05:15 PM 9 0 9 2 530 532 385 5 390 931 05:30 PM 9 1 10 3 523 526 333 5 338 874 05:45 PM 2 0 2 2 432 434 ._ 330 5 335 771 Total 30 32 12 2032 2044 1374 19 1393 3469 06:00 PM 7 2 9 3 337 3401 244 6 250 599 06:15 PM 6 3 9 4 360 364 1 268 6 274 647 Grand Total 60 7 67 32 3530 3562 2479 37 2516 6145 Apprch % 89.6 10.4 0.9 99.1 98.5 1.5 Total % 1.0 0.1 1.1 0.5 57.4 58.0 40.3 0.6 40.9 West ftcess Of (OLIt In Total6 60 7 R1ght Left I wo F� T 0O ++ North a rn m h 13124�3 4MOO PM CO L 73id71$ 6:15:00 PM 4 U N� 2p N rn PM Coen[ Data HE O m °1 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data Cantrell Road and West Access Drive Little Rock, AR P-1612 File Name : PM -West Site Code : 00000000 Start Date : 02/13/2013 Page No : 2 West Access Dr j Cantrell Rd. Cantrell Rd. From North I From East From West Start Time Right Left A . Total Right Thru App. Total Thru Left Peak Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 30 2 321 12 2032 2044 1374 19 Percent 93.8 6.3 0.6 99.4 98.6 1.4 05:15 Volume 9 0 9 2 530 532 385 5 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM Volume 10 1 11 5 547 552 385 5 Peak Factor 0.727 0.926 west Apoesg Dr out Tn Total 31 LO 34} 2 LO ov T 4 North AI d 13f217135,5:45:ft PM o g m U n�� 131�171300 PM w � PAA Count Date � � � 0 N � 4 App. Total Int. Total 1393 3469 390 931 0.932 390 0.893 PETERS & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC. Queues Timing Plan: AM 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct 2/20/2013 -# --I. *- t 4 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SST Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 2091 15 1154 16 30 3 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.92 0.05 0.51 0.07 0.12 0.01 Control Delay 3.0 16.2 3.4 4.9 14.7 15.0 12.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.0 16.2 3.4 4.9 14.7 15.0 12.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 150 1 50 3 6 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 #383 5 91 14 20 5 Internal Link Dist (ft) 77 585 324 324 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 110 Base Capacity (vph) 301 2282 301 2283 563 638 686 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.02 0.92 0.05 0.51 0.03 0.05 0.00 Intersection Sumnrn-ary # 95th ;; urc(,-ntile vulu.rne exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 1 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX AM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: AM 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct * 2/20/2013 ---►-- 4__ '1 I lam. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T +T I T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3534 1770 3538 1770 1593 1750 Fit Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.91 Satd. Flow (perm) 400 3534 289 3538 1408 1593 1627 Volume (vph) 5 1905 18 14 1060 2 15 1 27 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 2071 20 15 1152 2 16 1 29 1 1 1 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 5 2090 0 15 1154 0 16 29 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.8 25.8 25.8 25.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 Effective Green, g (s) 25.8 25.8 25.8 25.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 258 2279 186 2282 218 247 252 v/s Ratio Prot c0.59 0.33 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.92 0.08 0.51 0.07 0.12 0.01 Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 6.2 2.7 3.7 14.4 14.5 14.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 6.4 0.2 0.2 0.7 1.0 0.1 Delay (s) 2.6 12.6 2.8 3.9 15.1 15.5 14.4 Level of Service A B A A B B B Approach Delay (s) 12.5 3.9 15.4 14.4 Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 2 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX AM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Cantrell Road & Middle Dr Timing Plan: AM 2/20/2013 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ++ tT Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 1928 1068 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 2096 1161 1 1 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 157 pX, platoon unblocked 0.82 0.82 0.82 vC, conflicting volume 1162 2211 581 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 980 2257 274 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 96 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 575 29 595 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 1 1048 1048 774 388 2 Volume Left 1 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 1 1 cSH 575 1700 1700 1700 1700 54 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.46 0.23 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 3 Control Delay (s) 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.8 Lane LOS B F Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 73.8 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 3 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX AM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Cantrell Road & West Dr Timing Plan: AM 2/20/2013 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t} tip Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 1 1928 1068 1 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 2096 1161 1 1 1 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 449 pX, platoon unblocked 0.84 0.84 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 1162 2211 581 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1002 2252 310 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 96 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 577 29 576 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 1 1048 1048 774 388 2 Volume Left 1 0 0 0 0 1 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 1 1 cSH 577 1700 1700 1700 1700 56 Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.46 0.23 0.04 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 3 Control Delay (s) 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 Lane LOS B F Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 71.9 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 P1612 Cantrell Heights Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. B Page 4 EX AM Queues 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct Timing Plan: NOON 2/20/2013 Lane Group EBL --► EBT 4e WBL *-- WBT NBL t NBT 4 SFT Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1026 50 925 41 69 43 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.62 0.23 0.56 0.09 0.12 0.09 Control Delay 4.0 9.1 7.5 8.4 12.8 8.3 11.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.0 9.1 7.5 8.4 12.8 8.3 11 A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 77 6 67 6 5 5 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 84 15 74 25 27 24 Internal Link Dist (ft) 77 585 324 324 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 110 Base Capacity (vph) 227 1724 227 1725 569 692 637 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spiilback Cap Reductn 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.01 0.60 0.22 0.54 0.07 0.10 0.07 Intersection Summary P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 1 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX NOON HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: NOON 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct II2/20/2013 4--- 4'. t t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 1� *T+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3520 1770 3529 1770 1595 1753 Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.81 Satd. Flow (perm) 457 3520 396 3529 1358 1595 1483 Volume (vph) 3 910 34 46 834 17 38 3 61 31 2 6 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 989 37 50 907 18 41 3 66 34 2 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 26 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1020 0 50 922 0 41 43 0 0 38 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 13.2 13.2 13.2 Effective Green, g (s) 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8 13.2 13.2 13.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 1654 186 1659 448 526 489 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 0.26 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.13 c0.03 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.62 0.27 0.56 0.09 0.08 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 5.7 7.9 6.4 7.6 9.3 9.2 9.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 Delay (s) 5.7 8.6 7.2 8.0 9.7 9.5 9.5 Level of Service A A A A A A A Approach Delay (s) 8.6 8.0 9.6 9.5 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.40 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 2 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX NOON HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: NOON 6: Cantrell Road & Middle Dr 2/20/2013 --I. k' \%. -4/ Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt ti� Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 30 944 831 47 3 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 33 1026 903 51 3 23 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 157 pX, platoon unblocked 0.81 0.81 0.81 vC, conflicting volume 954 1507 477 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 714 1394 127 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 97 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 717 103 731 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 33 513 513 602 352 26 Volume Left 33 0 0 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 51 23 cSH 717 1700 1700 1700 1700 415 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.21 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.3 0.0 14.3 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 3 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX NOON HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Cantrell Road & West Dr Timing Plan: NOON 2/20/2013 Movement EBL -- EBT WBT 4,, WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt 0 Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 48 960 844 8 15 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 52 1043 917 9 16 41 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 449 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 0.85 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 926 1548 463 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 739 1469 196 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 93 83 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 735 94 692 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 52 522 522 612 314 58 Volume Left 52 0 0 0 0 16 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 9 41 cSH 735 1700 1700 1700 1700 246 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.18 0.23 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 0 22 Control Delay (s) 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 24.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 4 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX NOON Queues Timing Plan: PM 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct 2/20/2013 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1227 43 2061 66 59 48 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.56 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.19 0.17 Control Delay 4.0 6.0 5.5 20.7 16.3 11 A 14.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.0 6.0 5.5 20.7 16.3 11 A 14.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 61 3 163 13 8 9 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 123 15 #403 34 26 26 Internal Link Dist (ft) 77 585 324 324 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 120 110 Base Capacity (vph) 288 2184 288 2186 541 652 623 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Wo Ratio 0.02 0.56 0.15 0.94 0.12 0.09 0.08 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 1 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX PM HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: PM 3: Cantrell Road & Andover Ct II2/20/2013 --* f- 4-- 4\ t t41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3524 1770 3533 1770 1602 1729 Fit Permitted 0.16 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.81 Satd. Flow (perm) 302 3524 347 3533 1352 1602 1443 Volume (vph) 6 1096 33 40 1873 23 61 4 51 26 4 15 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 1191 36 43 2036 25 66 4 55 28 4 16 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 1 C Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 1224 0 43 2059 0 66 43 0 0 47 C Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 7.3 7.3 7.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7 7.3 7.3 7.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.18 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 2176 214 2182 247 292 263 v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 c0.58 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.12 c0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.56 0.20 0.94 0.27 0.15 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 4.5 3.3 7.0 14.1 13.7 13.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.5 9.2 2.6 1.1 1.5 Delay (s) 3.1 4.8 3.8 16.2 16.7 14.8 15.3 Level of Service A A A B B B B Approach Delay (s) 4.8 16.0 15.8 15.3 Approach LOS A B B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group P1612 Cantrell Heights Page 2 Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. EX PM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Cantrell Road & Middle Dr Timing Plan: PM 2/20/2013 --,, 4--- Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ++ +1� Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 13 1363 1934 31 3 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 14 1482 2102 34 3 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 157 pX, platoon unblocked 0.41 0.41 0.41 vC, conflicting volume 2136 2888 1068 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2329 4150 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 84 0 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 87 1 448 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SIB 1 Volume Total 14 741 741 1401 734 25 Volume Left 14 0 0 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 34 22 cSH 87 1700 1700 1700 1700 4 Volume to Capacity 0.16 0.44 0.44 0.82 0.43 5.99 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 0 0 0 0 Err Control Delay (s) 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Err Lane LOS F F Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 Err Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 68.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 P1612 Cantrell Heights Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. C Page 3 EX PM