Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Z-8629-B Application 1
Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development �� ►?��, � ►�! :sue F. F Case: Z-8629-B Location: 102 South Rodney Parham Ward: 6 N PD: 3 CT:21.03 0 125 250 TRS: T1 N R13W 2 Feet =11 Sketch City of Little Rock Planning &Development Case No: Z-8629-6 Name: Platinum Self Storage / Warehouse Location: 102 Rodney Parham Issue: CUP N k REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed X for Nan MARYJULIA HILL 6907 CARRILON DRIVE Add LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 _ Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # _Julie opposed for Name Addres Date on the agenda. Telephone No. `7 C-1/ REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any --time in tine Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, A-rkansas. I Fish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Date �{ REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS DISHING TO ADDRESS THE PL VN NiNG COMMIISSIO, This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # $ on the agenda. I am opposed for f Name _L&? Address k ',�*a Z� s `►� �� . Telephone No. elrl- Date Zb�, REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This. card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. ti I am opposed for Name _a:, t Address (4c 7 ,L- M o, k( ,-, Telephone No. a i p Date - REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WLSHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Mark -ham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # Iam Name Address for on the do. Date Telephone No. City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Robert Brown Development Consultants 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road. Suite 220 Little Rock. AR 72212 Date: August 26. 2016 Dear Mr. Brown: Case No. Z-8629-B Location: 102 S. Rodney Parham Road This is to advise you that in connection with your application for a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission at its meeting on August 25, 2016, Approved your application as submitted. Denied your application as submitted. Deferred action to the Meeting. X Approved your application with the following conditions: See the conditions outlined in the Planning Commission minutes. This is an approval for the USE only and was the first step in the process. Based on this use approval, you may submit your documentation and plans for review and permitting. All new and alteration construction requires building permits be obtained at 723 West Markham, 2"d floor BEFORE any work may begin. All permits required for implementation of the conditional use must be obtained within three (3) years of the date of the Commission's approval or the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked. Please be advised that there is an appeal period for 30 days from the date the Planning Commission made its decision. Any permits obtained or construction performed during this 30 day appeal period is done at your own risk and could be voided by the appeal process. If you have any questions, please call me at 371-6817. Sincerely, Dana Carney, Zoning and Sub vis` n Manager Department of Planning and Development DC/aa ta City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 July 19, 2016 Robert Brown Development Consultants 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220 Little Rock, AR 72212 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application at 102 S. Rodney Parham Dear Mr. Brown: Planning Zoning and Subdivision I have received your application for a conditional use permit for the property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham. The following is to remind you of important dates in the process. The sign provided to you must be posted on the property no later than July 25.2016. Required notices to owners of properties located within 200 feet of the subject property must be sent via certified mail no later than August 10, 2016. You must use the notice form provided to you by our office and you must obtain the list of property owners from an abstract or title company. The Subdivision Committee meeting for your application is August 3, 2016 at 12:00 noon. The meeting will be held in the Board of Director' chamber located on the second floor of City Hall at 500 W. Markham Street. You or your authorized representative must be present. Your item has been scheduled for the August 25, 2016 Planning Commission meeting. The meeting will begin at 4:00 p.m. and will be held in the Board of Directors; chamber located on the second floor of City Hall. Again, you or your authorized representative must be present. If you have any questions, please contact me at (501) 371-6817 or at dctzrnev`celittierock.� . Sincerely, Cc-co,� Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED NOVEMBER 7, 2016 TO: THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK MAYOR AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS RE: RESPONSE TO APPEAL FOR PLATINUM STORAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION The applicant and developer, Platinum Construction, along with their representatives, Development Consultants Inc. and Mr. David Jones, hereby offer this response to the appeal letter filed by Ms. Tracy Crain and Surrounding Neighbors of the Briarwood Neighborhood Association on September 22, 2016. While we understand that neighbors should always have an interest and input into adjacent development applications, there are many statements in the appeal letter that are not accurate and do not reflect the commitments made as part of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application. This property is zoned C-3, General Commercial, which allows a large number of more intensive uses than the conditioned storage facility that is proposed. A listing of positive features about this proposed development is as follows: 1. This property has been a vacant commercial site for several years now and has been collecting trash. A new development at this location would eliminate this problem and complement the existing commercial district along West Markham Street. 2. This use is much less intensive than other potential commercial uses allowed "by right," which would require no notifications to surrounding neighbors. 3. "By right' uses under the C-3 zoning classification include convenience stores, restaurants, bars/taverns, private clubs, apartments, hotels, schools, offices. Traffic, noise, and general activity would be far greater with other commercial uses. 4. The hours of use are limited with tenant access being allowed from 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM. Office hours are limited to 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through Friday; 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM Saturdays; and noon to 5:00 PM on Sundays. Access will be controlled by electronic code methods. 5. The proposed conditioned storage facility will only have access to storage spaces through the interior of the building where vehicles will enter and drive through. There will be no exterior doors to storage spaces. This approach provides a more secure building with only the two vehicle access doors at the north and south ends. 6. The building will be three stories, 36 feet in height, and will be constructed of quality materials that include architectural block and brick masonry, decorative metal paneis, and EFIS The color !scheme will be earth tones and it will look much like an office building. This is not a typical metal building mini -storage facility. 7. The developer anticipates only 13-15 tenant trips per day, based on their other developments. This is much less than any other C-3 use allowed "by right' and will help to reduce overall and peak hour traffic on the nearby streets. 8. There will not be any outside storage of vehicles, boats, trailers, campers, etc 9. Due to the building and access design, there will not be an unsightly security fence surrounding the site, or gates across the driveways. 10. No businesses will be allowed to operate from the facility and no flammable materials are allowed to be stored. G:\2016\16-169\Planning\16169-004 doc Engineering Planning 0 Land Surveying a Landscape Architecture 2290 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220 • Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 • Telephone 501.221-7880 • Fax 501-221-7802 609 West Dickson Street, Suite 205A • Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 • Telephone 479-444-7080 Page Two November 7, 2016 11. The existing trash enclosure location will be used to provide more separation from adjacent residences than a typical location in the rear of the site. 12. This facility will utilize wall mounted lights, at ±9 feet above finished floor, to light the base area around the building. Any other use would likely have overhead pole lights that could increase ambient lighting to adjacent residences. 13. There will be an increase in the landscape area and a decrease in the impermeable surfaces on the property. 14. The building setbacks provided are greater than required under C-3 zoning. The rear setback is over 65 feet and the minimum requirement is 25 feet. The eastern setback is over 53 feet and the minimum setback is 15 feet. 15. An apartment or office project could construct three story buildings directly on the minimum setback lines with no notice to any owners required. 16. Land use buffers will be provided adjacent to residential use, as are now required by current zoning regulations. A 25 foot, landscaped, land use buffer will be provided on the south boundary where less than 10 feet of green space exists today. A 12 foot land use buffer will be provided on the eastern boundary with a total of 15 feet of green space. 17. The privacy of the neighboring residences will be improved over many of the allowed alternative uses due to the increased setbacks, limited hours of operation, and lack of full time occupants. 18. Potential noise disturbance to the neighboring residences will be less than alternative uses due to the increased setbacks, limited hours of operation, and lack of full time occupants. 19. An existing masonry wall along the south and eastern boundaries will be preserved for screening, in lieu of the standard privacy fence requirement. 20. The estimated cost of this development is between $5,000,000 and $7,000,000 which represents a significant investment in this area. We feel that this is a quality project and is a good development for this location. Little Rock Planning & Development agrees and provided a positive review and recommendation at the Planning Commission hearing. The Planning Commission also agreed and voted 8 for, 1 against, with two absent at this same hearing. We thank you for your time and consideration in reviewing this appeal. Please feel free to contact myself at 501-221-7880, or Mr. David Jones at 214-883-3056 if you have any questions you may wish to ask. Sincerely, Development Consultants, Inc. ARobe. Brawn GA2016\16-169\Planning\16169-004.doc emu' i+ EINVId RIIS dno'1-11'flry V1 zWL SVSNV)WV'NOOa 31un 'MI VYVHdVdl3Na021'SZOL °0'tlONO°'"0° •� •••�,�•, w <� a 30V' �OiST3S Wf1NIlMdld �,�,3 ��� s� 2iO3 `JNIaime M3N a3SOdOad Nlm s a r s PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOR: .. naoAo.E�: o :LL� PLANTINUM SELF -STORAGE $ y a ... , ,,,.....e. 102 S. RODNEY PARHAM RD. F .•. �.. ���7�pEgM�� spgo eT LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72212 a F x s i"D��` _> m 2 ,�•,,,,,�,„ MIL. naaNG,��o,,,,I ��rt.a�aM�sPA�BT PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOR: PLANTINUM SELF -STORAGE 102S.RODNEYPARHAMRD. LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72212 a Bozynski, Tony From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:09 AM To: Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana Cc: 'David Jones'; Tom Cole; 'Shawn Valk' Subject: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Attachments: 16-169 2016-11-15 CUP Site Plan.pdf; 16021-RENDERING-l.pdf; 16021- RENDERING-2.pdf Attached are an updated site plan drawing, and two revised renderings of the proposed building. We sent notices to all 200' owners, as well as Ms. Mary -Julia Hill of Briarwood, on Monday November 7, and held a second neighborhood meeting at the offices of RPM on Saturday November 12 at 2:00 PM. We had one resident attending who was Ms. Rose Bradley of 224 Sunnymeade, along with her daughter, Ms. Kathy O'Connor of North Little Rock. Also attending was Ms. Joan Adcock, CLR BOD. The meeting went from 2:00 PM to a little after 3:00 PM and we discussed items that the attending persons had questions about. We also presented the new renderings which show the windows removed from the south side and south end of the east side of the building. This change was in response to concerns previously raised by neighbors regarding privacy. There was further discussion of the driveway access at Sunnymeade. They buyer/developer was contacted after the meeting and decided to revise the plan to remove the monument sign and install a fire access gate. The gate and driveway will now only be used for emergency access. This makes four significant concessions by the developer: 1. Removal of exterior access doors to rental units so that all access is internal. 2. Removal of windows on portions of the building that face the neighborhood/residences. 3. Gating of the eastern driveway to Sunnymeade to allow emergency access only. 4. Removal of the proposed monument sign at the eastern driveway. I will have slides of these and other images at the BOD hearing tonight. Robert M. Brown ■ Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 Boz nski, Ton From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:50 PM To: Honeywell, Jon Cc: Floriani, Vince; Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana Subject: Platinum Storage CUP - Storm Drainage Attachments: 16-169 2016-08-18 PRIOR PERVIOUS SURFACES.pdf; 16-169 2016-08-18 PROPOSED PERVIOUS SURFACES.pdf, 16-169 2016-11-15 CUP Site Plan.pdf; 16-169 2016-08-08 CUP SC Response Letter.pdf Jon: I am forwarding this email for your information regarding the surface area changes and our acknowledgement of the requirement to for a drainage analysis with the design of this project, see attachments. There are two exhibits attached that show the prior and proposed pervious surface areas for this site. Our analysis shows that the landscape/pervious areas will be increased by approximately 56 percent. Since this site was previously developed, and the impervious surface area is being reduced, there is no requirement for detention. The reduction in impervious surface area should also reduce the runoff rate a bit. The total pervious surface area is now up from 14 percent to 22 percent of the site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Robert M. Brown 16 L' I Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 0:501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 11 II111 _ IIIII � 9 r °9�8C s�"¢i593}u PIN;• a�ySS s: sg \g• 3 jz r aP 9 r �i esrxgV,s;�s-aq�e S4jjY �=a �?,aY�o_3�k�ia3eeje; s fSSfFa �ev�sysx3?a$a?sE3;c }�IvkiLl�i€ 3e_�a}94'mRs�g`P�.eF Eaa° B vd a33 :Sin Bpi fill se aaiv; xN l�s ,;�1 13ap6 i"�Y vq"�6F I a ! o I I � HIP ti i6m �3 u C O / a x a i f� � � ! � 1 •I ;. �#4� � 8��� c� �� ,fit € � � `ail'$ .+ .• I .1..ra.ne.Nr.ev..ra F % � x � o � �€m gL s g �* v },', _ ■ PLATINUM SELF.STORAGE STORAGE e 'f''- LCUP SITE PLAN a Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:18 PM To: Floriani, Vince; Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates LRFD Approves. Robert M. Brown It I 1 #0I 0: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 From: Rhodes, Tony [mailto:TRhodes@littlerock.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:16 PM To: Robert Brown; 'David Jones'; 'Shawn Valk' Subject: RE: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates We have reviewed and approved the plans for the gate. From: Robert Brown [mailto:rbrown@dc-I_r.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:40 PM To: 'David Jones' <davidiones2626@yahoo.com>; 'Shawn Valk' <sliawriv al!.(r gniai1.coni>; Rhodes, Tony <TRh odes @ I itt I eroc k.gov> Subject: FW: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates FYI .... Also sending to LRFD per Vince Floriani. Robert M. Brown 11 11i1 0: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 From: Floriani, Vince [rnailto:VF]oriani littlerack. ov] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:50 AM To: Robert Brown Cc: Bozynski, Tony Subject: RE: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates I am good with this along as LRFD is Ok also. Vince Floriani, P.E. Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering 701 W. Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-371-4817 From: Robert Brown [mai[ta;rbro%Nn(a-�dci-Ir.cam] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:26 AM To: Floriani, Vince Cc: Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Please take a look at the attached and updated site plan. The developer has offered to place a fire access gate near the eastern end of the driveway to Sunnymeade. I sent this and discussed it with Tony Bozynski this morning and we wanted you to take a look and comment. With the gate being placed at the eastern end of the driveway, I am assuming we do not need a turn around. This was mentioned at some point earlier in the process, but I believe it was contemplating a gate being placed further to the west. Thank you, Robert M. Brown 19501.22 U 880 C: 501.804.7881 From: Robert Brown Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:09 AM To: Tony Bozynski ; Dana Carney Cc: 'David Jones'; Tom Cole; 'Shawn Valk' Subject: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Attached are an updated site plan drawing, and two revised renderings of the proposed building. We sent notices to all 200' owners, as well as Ms. Mary -Julia Hill of Briarwood, on Monday November 7, and held a second neighborhood meeting at the offices of RPM on Saturday November 12 at 2:00 PM. We had one resident attending who was Ms. Rose Bradley of 224 Sunnymeade, along with her daughter, Ms. Kathy O'Connor of North Little Rock. Also attending was Ms. Joan Adcock, CLR BOD. The meeting went from 2:00 PM to a little after 3:00 PM and we discussed items that the attending persons had questions about. We also presented the new renderings which show the windows removed from the south side and south end of the east side of the building. This change was in response to concerns previously raised by neighbors regarding privacy. There was further discussion of the driveway access at Sunnymeade. They buyer/developer was contacted after the meeting and decided to revise the plan to remove the monument sign and install a fire access gate. The gate and driveway will now only be used for emergency access. This makes four significant concessions by the developer: 1. Removal of exterior access doors to rental units so that all access is internal. 2. Removal of windows on portions of the building that face the neighborhood/residences. 3. Gating of the eastern driveway to Sunnymeade to allow emergency access only. 4. Removal of the proposed monument sign at the eastern driveway. I will have slides of these and other images at the BOD hearing tonight Robert M. Brown 10 C I Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:38 PM To: Rhodes, Tony; Baker, Ryan S. Cc: Floriani, Vince; Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Attachments: 16-169 2016-11-15 CUP Site Plan.pdf As a concession to neighborhood concerns about traffic, the developer of this project has agreed to add a gate to the east end of the Sunnymeade driveway (see attached site plan). Please take look at the location shown and provide your approval. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Robert M. Brown 10 C I O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 From: Floriani, Vince[mailto:VFloriani@littlerock.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:50 AM To: Robert Brown Cc: Bozynski, Tony Subject: RE: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates I am good with this along as LRFD is Ok also. Vince Floriani, P.E. Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering 701 W. Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-371-4817 From: Robert Brown [mailto:rbrown dci-Ir.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:26 AM To: Floriani, Vince Cc: Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Please take a look at the attached and updated site plan. The developer has offered to place a fire access gate near the eastern end of the driveway to Sunnymeade. I sent this and discussed it with Tony Bozynski this morning and we wanted you to take a look and comment. With the gate being placed at the eastern end of the driveway, I am assuming we do not need a turn around. This was mentioned at some point earlier in the process, but I believe it was contemplating a gate being placed further to the west. Thank you, Robert M. Brown O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 1:50 PM To: Honeywell, Jon Cc: Floriani, Vince; Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana Subject: Platinum Storage CUP - Storm Drainage Attachments: 16-169 2016-08-18 PRIOR PERVIOUS SURFACES.pdf; 16-169 2016-08-18 PROPOSED PERVIOUS SURFACES.pdf, 16-169 2016-11-15 CUP Site Plan.pdf, 16-169 2016-08-08 CUP SC Response Letter.pdf Jon: I am forwarding this email for your information regarding the surface area changes and our acknowledgement of the requirement to for a drainage analysis with the design of this project, see attachments. There are two exhibits attached that show the prior and proposed pervious surface areas for this site. Our analysis shows that the landscape/pervious areas will be increased by approximately 56 percent. Since this site was previously developed, and the impervious surface area is being reduced, there is no requirement for detention. The reduction in impervious surface area should also reduce the runoff rate a bit. The total pervious surface area is now up from 14 percent to 22 percent of the site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Robert M. Brown Iti I,I Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 SV3 v 3ov:junS snom3d 9NIISIX3 r '7nSNOO oj2I Stl3tltl 33Vdans SnOIA'd3d 03sodONd N 3•JtlHOlS 39Vt101Sdrl37s WnNLLtlld Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:09 AM To: Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana Cc: 'David Jones'; Tom Cole; 'Shawn Valk' Subject: Platinum Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting and Updates Attachments: 16-169 2016-11-15 CUP Site Plan.pdf; 16021-RENDERING-1.pdf; 16021- RENDERING-2.pdf Attached are an updated site plan drawing, and two revised renderings of the proposed building. We sent notices to all 200' owners, as well as Ms. Mary -Julia Hill of Briarwood, on Monday November 7, and held a second neighborhood meeting at the offices of RPM on Saturday November 12 at 2:00 PM. We had one resident attending who was Ms. Rose Bradley of 224 Sunnymeade, along with her daughter, Ms. Kathy O'Connor of North Little Rock. Also attending was Ms. Joan Adcock, CLR BOD. The meeting went from 2:00 PM to a little after 3:00 PM and we discussed items that the attending persons had questions about. We also presented the new renderings which show the windows removed from the south side and south end of the east side of the building. This change was in response to concerns previously raised by neighbors regarding privacy. There was further discussion of the driveway access at Sunnymeade. They buyer/developer was contacted after the meeting and decided to revise the plan to remove the monument sign and install a fire access gate. The gate and driveway will now only be used for emergency access. This makes four significant concessions by the developer: 1. Removal of exterior access doors to rental units so that all access is internal. 2. Removal of windows on portions of the building that face the neighborhood/residences. 3. Gating of the eastern driveway to Sunnymeade to allow emergency access only. 4. Removal of the proposed monument sign at the eastern driveway. I will have slides of these and other images at the BOD hearing tonight. Robert M. Brown 19 C I Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:04 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Platinum Storage - Second Neighborhood Meeting Attachments: 16-169 2016-11-07 Notice of Info Meeting & Cert Slips.pdf FYI: We sent out notices on Monday for a second neighborhood meeting regarding this project. The meeting will be at the offices of Rector Phillips Morse, Saturday at 2:00-3:30 PM, The Prospect Building, 8th Floor Conference Room, 1501 North University Avenue. Attached are certified mail receipts and a copy of the notice form. In addition to the 200 foot owners, we also sent a copy to Mary -Julia Hill, representative for Briarwood. Robert M. Brown ■ ■ Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 cup.doc NOTICE OF INFOMATIONAL MEETING REGARDING PLATINUM STORAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 03/01/10 To all owners of lands lying within 200 feet of the boundary of property at: Address: 102 South Rodney Parham Road, Little Rock, AR 72205 General Location: South Side of Rodney Parham Road, ±300 Feet South Of West Markham Street Owned By: King Chow & Jasmine Lin Present Use: Vacant Property Proposed Use: Conditioned Storage Facility Notice is hereby given that an informational meeting regarding the Platinum Storage Conditional Use Permit on the above property will be held to discuss the project and answer questions from area residents. The date, time and location are as follows: Date: Saturday, November 12, 2016 Time: 2:00 PM to 3:30 PM Location: The Offices of Rector Phillips Morse, Inc. The Prospect Building, 81h Floor Conference Room 1501 North University, Suite 800 Little Rock, AR 72207 Directions: Across the parking lot from Forest Place Apartments on University. Driving North on University from the Park Plaza Mall, go North, past the Evergreen Street intersection, then take the first right, turn left at the stop sign, you will be headed towards the 9 story office building, which is the Prospect Building. If you need assistance you can contact Tom Cole at 501.960.3648. All interested parties may appear and be heard at said time and place. AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that I have notified all the property owners of record within 200 feet of the above described property that an informational meeting will be held at the time and place described above. AGENT: 4e- 6ent nsultants, Inc. n DATE: //" 7- Z01 i0 Domestic Mali G For delivery fntom it WYNNE;r AR '�'7139, , C3 Er �. m C3 Certified Fee M C3 Return Flocolpi FOG (Endorsornont Roqulred) C3 Roa,tletnd Ddrmry Foo C3 (Endu,nomant Amulratl) r" $1 .' $0.00 r_,1 Postmark $G.GG . :Hereco •; Total Postage &rears [ 11 /07/2016 $3.77 Randy Marr C3 rro� 1020 Oakwood Drive N Wynne, AR 72396 ra - r9 Q, Cr o LITtLE RpCKyIAR.71205 mPaatagr� �G ,�U),1 t3�t C3 Certified Fee $G • CIO C3Roiurn RuCrrlpl Fua C3 (Endorsamontnaquirodt $0.00 ? :a FtvrltlOad Delivery Fea 'bU . C4� ` 'e Prratrnfid5�} �i were ' r (Enrkuaurnnnl Rrtgnlrad} CC (ti $U �7 ru 101al Postage & Fees 11 /07/2016 =- sm,r . $3.77 Sean & Charmaine Smith 301 Brookpark Drive ------ It or Po ; Little Rock, AR 72205 CFry ............ Ln m r. • Er tr LONG REACkosi3 C3 °-' PonA4& 30 m 1:3 Cerlilled Fee Return Receipt Fee C� •�� rb cm b 4' cm (Endorsement Required) $ 0 , 00 � i �LIV �. Resutcmd Deg tvery Fee �j� ��%/ O (EnrtorsrxnenlRagulrad) Fca u Total Postage & Fe. ant $3.77 r9 SAS Family Trust O euos. N or PC c/o Kurt Braun Schneitar 3633 E. Broadway LIT 100 Long Beach, CA 90803 U.S. Postal Service" SCERTIFIED MAIU RECEIPT o ,. Only n, IT' Cr .LIT7LE.ROCI�AR 72G5 sj;1�7`' 0 Er P� �G GGI. m lti 0 Certified Fee $G.CIG v C3 C3 nololsrnocul Fna �' y 0 (EndonomOrd Raq llren) $U. GU R—d-L1ud i)altvary iron •[ t I Cr` � [� (F.ndar5enran! Rlxtufred] ru Total Postage & Fees 11 /47I2C(1 b ru onr $3.77 Miramar Properties LLC ........... o '-PC 0,202 S. Rodney Parham Road r� PC wry ; Little Rock. AR 72205 4714 cp - - - ru r.mestic Mail Only Er For delivery Intormation, visit our webrite at www.usps. tr PH4ENI X: d,6 w L -�- C3 Certified Fee $0. UCI Z n $oslmark 1 �' C3 Return Roodpl Foe • UUO Horo 0 (Endorsement Requirod) $0 . 00 d fleylnclad Da}irnry Fee � V C3 (FrldoruamrntRr•t;ulrad) r%- $U. fU Total Postage & Pn'M 11 /07/2016 -1- soar , $3.77 ---- r-9 ARCP RL Portfolio VI LLC ____ o orroal _ N or PO i 2325 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100-....-. Phoenix, AZ 85016 ru S Domestic Qr Er For delivery information, visit our webstte at www.vaps.com'- Er Cok6a" IN 8G1$ C3 a .- -- 117 Pos ;6, 30 M p Certllled Fee $G, [ICI C3Roh,tn Rocalpt Fee (EndorcomnntRequkod) i�(S- $G.IA1 Postmark E3 Ji�'� C3 RPslrlelad 0011 Tory Fee (Enkd tsolntmnt Roqufrod)co • �_,,,_ , •_� ru Total Postaaa &Fens . 11 /07/ 2016 $3.77 - — oat r-1 King Chow & Jasmine Lin C3 IL Wme 976 Mirror Lake Lane orpc Cordova, TN 38018 ........... I n, ul DomesticUall Only rr Er For deAvejyInIformation, visit our WabSite at www.uspar.com*. LI TT,LEAkK ir BAR 722CIS . ) Cr Poxt� . 30 -06 C3 Certified Fee M Return Receipt Fee j�r� osernari� 0 (Endorsement Required) $0. 0[I Nora CL ReslrlCiod Doiivery Fee Y } t I� (Endoreo ri.1 Required) t' 5 1 Co ru Total Postage & Foos 1 h 1�%0.7+1`116 S N557 TO ri WW Realty Co. ....... C1 r� ar Pp &rpos 13 Wingfield Circle G'iry 5i: Little Rock, AR 72205--------- U.S. Postal m CERTIFIED °RECEIPT r, Domestic mail o nly IrLr LITTCE ht3:vl{', ifiR. 72175.t ' . o � M )/ p Certified Fee p Rolum Receipt Fee ArlalmgCkf rr, (Endatsomont RibriW00) $0.06 , Herar. Reslriclivi Dofivery Fee �•'y V f O (Endurssrrteni Required) CO ru 11/0712016 $3.77 r-1 Bill Lamb 0 i 220 Sunnymeade Drive ...... Little Rock, AR 72205 nj a- ■. _ c • -0 m For delivery infotmation, visit our LITTLE�AOUPIAR•.7 05 , I_. Posh y� i�T I D 91 Certified Fee $0, [ICI a ��\ — eta t3E( C I'a l L Return R�sr:el=Il Fea Hero p 1 l� (Endorsement Required) $0.u0 7 f Ra:Dlated Delivery Foo' 4, �:: • •`Y, (f:lxlarzumtmi negnirad) ,P ry $0 7 '� �`' :. Total P--.- o. c..oe .' '1.�.1 Y �'• 0� O $3.77 Ln Senr O r-9 Insurance X-Change Inc. ......... o YkilVii 212 S. Rodney Parham, Road r- orPOf Little Rock, AR 72205 Gily �f ------ Uanvesric Mai! G I, For delivery inforR Er LITTLE R0(k,, ,9ARK,72215 Y f co mros&3. 0 C3 Cortflled Fes $ S" *OM O Return Rlpt Foqo orinoRidror (End[ Hare t r'r n:I E3 Ro:�kkh,d Del}my Fua (Endorsement Roqu6od) [ ` � CO r• Total Poslege & Fears• . -A VOW2016 $3.77 Pendleton Properties LLC O:;I; r� .... or P.O. Box 55445 ............. Little Rock, AR 72215 ....... ...... &� DomesticOnly , C3 LITTLE'R0%, BAR 72105 w 0 nj Posl9 ?to Certified Fee $0 • [IO / O (Endorsolnenl Rcuimd) $0 [0 + How NW l r O nev rktod Delivery Foe fir' 00- ('0 r O (Endornnmonl Ragdbud) r f Q' Total Pnmo o $3.77 _ - n[ i � Rose Bradley Revocable Living piicori Trust r� or POE 224 Sunnymeade Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 rQ Domestic Orify O C3 LI TU,"RO$I£ r JAR° `72�07; , y f Certified Fee C3 $0,00 w ]]jf Poslnidi OO RokunFiocelptFoe "�+ == (Endorsement nogulred) $ 0 . 00 -H n p nl : rYt Revricted Delrvey Feu • 0 t =� • �\ �' E3 (Endoraentonl ricr(ulred) ru $Il,47 ]�{ r�.,.. Er Total Postage & Fees �i: 11 / 1J I��U16 o $3.77 U') r7 Mostafa Lotfi-Gelian 0 7210 Illinois Street r` �� Little Rock, AR 72207 Postal CERTIFIED ° RFCEIPT 'n Domestic Mail Only p LITTLE ROCK AR -TV 07 r- .rti- r Certified Fee p p Rulurnli°culplFuo . ,i Pgeweldrki1i3O p (EndoMmi°nt FWqulred) $0. G[I _" _ p Roslrktrc! Deuvoly Foe (Endorsamant Rnqukod) ` hI p ru I r Total Poslalle &Feea 11 ID7/ 01 6� $3.77 Ln ,;or James Bilheimer ._...__--.... 11 aErl- 323 Sunnymeade Drive Little Rock, AR 72207 U.S. Postal Service Ir ERTIFIED MAJL@ RECEIPT m Domestic mail only C3, p LITTLE :900t BAR. 72�05. ru p certlnad Fee p p R[rkrrn RaCeipf Foe . [i— (Endorsemom Royulrad) e$G.4 L,t Poslmwk --r Here Stay tdclyd prdWruy FPe �,Lr. ,„ I ' p (FRdnleprnni l R°guketl] 1 Dru $ 0 T fw P—t—R F_n 11� I $3.77 Ll r__q Michael Smith d 312 Sunnymeade Drive ............... r` °' Little Rock, AR 72205 ------------ m DomestOlthaill Only Ln For delivery Information, vistt our website at www.usps.corn`*. p LI rL, EA009 r 107 2 05 : 'F-`Sr1 J ^ 1 A ru Certifled Fee $I].(10 �7),P p RolurnReceiptFooHero (EndorsenlontRoqulrod) $G.00C3Resulelod Defivery Foo p (C+dorsmnvntnaqulrod) ru $(1 • ° y^ p— Total Poslaoe & Fees 1 $�- E3 $3.77 r=1 Lillian Kendrick C3 Lisa Fay Kendrivk 312 Carpenter Drive ................ Little Rock, AR 72205 ru ru Domestic r` .LIyTLEiOr-�2i1 tL«t' o OGr Posasgo' CfU �$ AA CertIDed Fee MOO I C3 p C3 Reitun Rea:vlpl Foe (Endorsonfont Required) Postmark ' Here p ReslriGoa DWWory Foe PCri<flr - p (emiorsornont n°gelred) ru $0 *K D— Total 0-1— X F-A= 11 /G7/2U16 p $3.77 .iuRf Ln r9 Robert Shaver, Joseph Shaver ........... C3 sl. a 12824 Cherry Laurel Drive rti, or PC Little Rock, AR 72211 ... —0 Domestic Only p �LITTLEWO,f''�j22` E3 ...0 ru F,,0 t 0015 Cerliflad Pao r 1= . UU `L' .antrrrffiIr 9f`�' . p Rlu Rucalpl Fa° are l� (FndvrBorpaenlunt ttegrdwd) $0. (t(( r C C3 Rugtrlctod Dokvory Fop Ur.f N 101 i U i tl p (Endarapninnl Rogolrod) ru Fe$G. D^ TOW Pnaraoo &es � C3 $3.77- Ln K & H Properties LLC-•••••--- p orP 4804 Bella rosa drive city. Little rock, AR 72223 ..... cry, U.S. Postal Service - CERTIFIED p p Domestic N o.LIVLE ROCK+ 72105 ru p Certlfled Fee Postmark N p RMUm Recoipl Foo `I p (Endwoomont Rugulwd) $G. Gig f ra 'y f i p ReWOad DPHvery oa • f,, C3(Crxlorrwrluot Ruglrlrad) aJ> ti ru Er Total Pm%tena & Feea .�i', 11 /G7/2U16 C3 T $3.77 Ln Roberto Aqui p ner' Raymund Aqui r` or 320 Carpenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 I Domestic Mail Only f`- ,LITTLE a RUMP PR 72105 L -- - FU Aoa ry Certifled Fee $4 (t(l iri N a �0 �_ r'eatmitrk y a Relum Flcco3pf Foo a (Endorsemeni Rpetdlrod) z 1•10rp y a RQSIrIClall r]eikrory Fua•� a (F.ndoruoinonl Reclidrodj ti $0.47 Er TOW Pnef—A Fnn. n. 11/07/2016 a Wd $3.77 Ln r-1 I Tracy Crain ........... M urr 324 Carpenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 ............. 6f Domestic Mail • fily o LI-7TLF,ACFK, Aft 7 2 M fU — . PoslM 30 F1]11 070 O Certllled Fee #0. a E3 O Rnturn fttreslpI F- "$1?. fEndm4inant Rpqukvtl] $0.OLj Psetmark Vero [� a a _ .�' RosUkted C7olNory Fop (N moomont AN r" a c y4) $0 4T ` p� o T ... $3.77 1'�7120i6 ►n Sd Alonzo &Sharon Burba i 223 Avignon Circle M1 or Little Rock, AR 72223 (: r Domestic Mail Only C13 It - O LITTLE gO i ' PR. 72105-Mi a Ppsi o,00--- 1171-- Certlfled Fee a a flalarn Rocolpl Fco $0 (I(t $1Y-00--• r 1 Posimerk Here a (EndoraomsntR•gtjkotA $0.00 O RuMuleiad t]ellvery Foa $ 9n _ .. . y'2,?l, tCncfprsgnwnt Rs�ulrad) ,, ErTotal Posteas a Fews' . 11 /07/2016 a $3.77 Ln dry Dolores Mapili a orP Ernesto Mapili r` 400 Carpenter Drive C�?y, Little Rock, AR 72205 r-q .: rq , LIT LE ti R�C3� r AR ' 7�2Q5• , ru 00 . . Ir Postru ed �(( ��flil�Vf1 Certifled Fes murk rU 1:00� ,_.+�wo s d RatIXPI Recelpt Fes $0. 00 r_}# C3 (Endorsomvnt Reclulrad) 10 C3 RosuWed AcllveryFM 1 r tEadwsemrmt Rrksd] f G lv $ 111t�T12 ITi� �` � Total Po^'^^^ C. r-1 $3.77 �, onr7'v ••••• MaryJtslia bill prro�rsi fi907 Carriivn Rd r, or Po so: Littte Bock• AR 72205 Carney, Dana From: Langley, Susan Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:09 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Appeal Attachments: SKM_C654e16092214000.pdf See the attached information that an individual brought in this afternoon to appeal a Planning Commission vote. Z016 22 PM I:53 To: City of Little Rock Board Members CC: Erma Hendrix (Ward 1), Ken Richardson (Ward 2), Kathy Webb (Ward 3), Brad Cazort (Ward4)Doris Wright (Ward 6), Lance Hines (Ward 5), B.J. (Brenda) Wyrick (Ward 7), Dr. Dean Kumpuris (Pos. 8), Gene Fortson (Pos. 9), Joan Adcock (Pos, 10) Date: September 22, 2016 From: Tracy Crain and Surrounding Neighbors of the Briarwood Neighborhood Association Re: Letter of Appeal against proposed Storage Facility at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road Please accept this letter of appeal in regard to the conditional use permit that was approved to allow for the construction of a three-story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned, 1, 87 acre tract located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road, next to Red Lobster and adjacent to the neighbors living along Sunnymeade and Carpenter Drive of the Briarwood neighborhood in Little Rock. There are numerous reasons that we are opposing the development of this construction project on the land that is currently owned by King Chow and Jasmine Lin/Development Consultants, Inc. Please note that these property owners do not live in our neighborhood, our city or the state of Arkansas. Therefore, they have no real vested interest in what becomes of the land or how it impacts the community outside of their own financial interests. Chow King/Lin Jasmine of 976 Mirror Lake Lane in Cordova, TN purchased the property in 2010 for $690,000. It is not clear how a small storage facility will be able to recoup their investment in the property and the new building. The owners of the development proposing to buy the land for the storage facility, however, are also from out of state and are not involved, nor will they be involved, in the on -site management of the property on a daily basis We are dealing with an out of state owner and an out of state buyer. Neither of these parties are concerned with how it impacts area residents, nor can they be counted on to maintain and help reduce issues associated with the proposed development. The new owners, once the sale has completed, may state that they will hire a responsible manager for the storage facility, but there is no guarantee. Security for storage facilities is difficult in the best of situations. Out of state owners are not likely to work diligently to address those issues. Or, to do what it takes to maintain the integrity of the surrounding area, especially in regard to how it impacts residents. As long as the facility is being rented, they are less likely to care about the crime it may attract or the issues that it brings to the neighborhood. The bottom line is that an out of state owner is not likely to be responsive to any problems with the facility since they do not have ties to the community. Additional Objections Summary of Objections A.) The opportunity for employment that this space brings is minimal. Perhaps two jobs at maximum. B.) Many residents feel that aesthetically this storage facility is not appealing. C.) It does not reflect the character of or benefit the neighborhood. D.) Loss of Property Value. Residents are concerned this will lower property values due to a variety of factors such as security, privacy, noise and crime. Potentially endangers the business of one of our most lucrative restaurants, Red Lobster. Imagine someone with a big couch hanging from a truck driving to the building, while restaurant patrons are trying to go to eat. It doesn't make sense to have that there. E.) Security concerns: This facility does not have extra lighting. Nor does it have 24 hour staffing. No security gate. This factor will help to support crime. People will be able to access the building from 9p.m. to 6a.m. without anyone being at the facility. Times have been amended somewhat, but there is still an issue of access, as some will be able to use a code at anytime, from what we are told. F.) Traffic Concerns. Will create significant traffic issues in an area that is already congested on Rodney Parham. Will present a threat to children and elderly on Sunnymeade and Carpenter. This will impact safety, the ability to get to homes, navigate through the neighborhood, ability to live in peace and other issues. We have blind people who walk along that route on a regular basis. This presents additional concerns for them. This facility, if developed, will bring in an average of 10 or more Uhauls or trucks a day. It will bring traffic to the neighborhood all hours of the night and day. Roads are already congested in the neighborhood. Please do not allow access to or through Sunnymeade for patrons. G.) Too many storage facilities already! It is a fact that we have an "Overabundance" of storage facilities in too close of a proximity to each other. Another storage facility has already been approved in the area. An additional facility will impact the success of that project and existing facilities. Other storage facilities are concerned about impact on their business. There are at least 12 in the immediate and surrounding areas. Could someone please show us the legitimate need to have this facility built, especially in my backyard and the backyard of my neighbors? H.) In the short time that we have had to inform residents, 150 area residents have signed a petition opposing this construction. 1.) Proposed buyer has a chain of storage facilities that have public complaints against them for poor maintenance and suspect business practices. (Rodents are already a problem there and residents do not want more rodents.) 1) Please... _No extra height. (Some areas of the storage are higher than others) In general, the extra height presents additional security and privacy issues. Windows in the upper units will DEFTNITELY ENCROACH on the privacy of nearby residents and will present additional crime issues for the area and the residents. K.) Noise and Other Disturbances. Noise from the facility doors may adversely impact area residents. Consideration must be given to how the facility operations will echo and impact those living in close proximity. Storage manager will not be able to control the sound of moving and opening/closing of doors. Activities may potentially go on throughout all hours of the night and day. It will prohibit people from being able to rest peacefully in their homes or to do their work. It will upset animals and create disturbances. L.) Drainage Issues. It has already been said that the existing drainage is too small. Tapping into an already overtaxed area is not a good idea. There is no evidence that this is not going to have a detrimental impact on residents. M.)There is a wall of varying heights that separate the storage facility from the back yards. In most instances, it is not taller than a person. Renovations in the buffer zone may present challenges to existing wall and the integrity of the existing area. We have historically had drainage issues in this area. We would like to request an environmental impact study due to the potential for damage to the existing area and residents. N.) Signage. Signage will detract from the value of our property, especially the first residence of neighborhood located on Sunnymeade. Inquiry: Are the developers required to have a buffer zone between their sign and neighbor's yard? We always thought that was a public street. Please clarify: They are claiming a public right of way as a private drive. We have questions about who owns that and who is claiming ownership. Could you please clarify who owns it? If they do own it... don't they still need a buffer? If not, why would that not apply. What are the rules about signage? Overall, it is not a good idea and will have nothing but negative impact on the nearby residents- O.) Many feel that we were not given adequate public notice. There are two instances in particular where we know there was not signage or someone did not receive a letter due to documents that have not been updated. P.) The ability for neighbors to attend meetings is very limited. Schedules are adversely impacted and most people cannot get away from work. We also have neighbors who are disabled and cannot be here in person, nor could they attend the developers meeting that was held with me. Many feel this project is significantly taking advantage of them and their capacity to fight this initiative. Q.) Proposed buyer has a chain of storage facilities that have public complaints against them for poor maintenance and suspect business practices. (According to one online source, rodents are a problem for the storage facility and residents do not want more rodents.) R.) Storage facility would block the gardening efforts and hurt the existing landscape design of the area houses. It is unfairly encroaching on the area resident homes. S.) Loss of Privacy: Resident living directly next to this facility will be at risk. There is a window that people in the storage facility can see out of on the second floor. It will allow people to see directly into the back yards of the nearby residents. It will also allow them means to access us and the opportunity to monitor without our knowledge. It is a significant threat to the nearby residents. For all this reasons and more, we ask that you please vote "No" against the conditional use permit and block this project from encroaching on our homes, the neighborhood, area businesses, and the community at large. It will place nearby storage facilities, some which are new developments at risk. It will also place restaurants at risk. It will definitely place area residents and animals in the neighborhood at risk. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. I do live directly next to this proposed facility. I am concerned about my own privacy. Furthermore, my neighbors have reached out to me and asked me to help block this. They are just as concerned. I am attaching just a few of the comments that were publically posted, when I first made it public knowledge. You may access the online petition if you wish to review the more than 100 signatures and comments that have been posted there. The website is provided for your review on the following attached pages. n Regards, t r r(a Tracy Crai Briarwood Neighborhood 501-766-1132 Notations about Storage Facility from Neighborhood Tracy Crain wrote I received a certified letter, that I believe, is inviting me to a discussion this month on whether or not to approve a permit for a storage facility next to Red Lobster. 1 know another storage facility is going to be built on Rodney Parham, where the Green Tree Nursery was located. There is another storage facility on Cunningham Lake Road, on the side of Kroger. Altogether, that would be three storage facilities in about a one mile radius of each other. Catherine "Not all developments are bad and not all developers are bad guys, but there are some seriously devious ones pulling some shady stuff. They'll maneuver and manipulate, and they count on the neighbors not knowing the process or the players as well as they do, and being too busy to do what it takes to show up and stop them. Our neighborhood has firsthand experience with this, and we successfully defeated the development! But it was a LOT of effort. Just don't automatically assume good intentions. The bad guys are looking to make a quick buck, and are not interested in what's good for your neighborhood, or the city. Not saying this guy is a bad guy, but the bad guys know how to act like they're not." from 2d ago HUM mmmm.,....another'storage facility'....for more of our'stuff- - - Inspires rumination on the idea that it might behoove many of us, to read, or in my case to REread Marie Kondo's book , Spark Joy.:)" from - t 2d ago And the facility by the Valero and the storage facility at the U-Haul. I'd say we had enough from 2d ago Whether there's pros or cons I personally believe that if this goes through we're going to be like living in a business zone which will hurt our real estate prices. And yes I believe that it would cause more negative activity around here that we don't need. SusanD from 2d ago 1 can't speak for the storage facilities in Arkansas or the laws governing them but I have known people in the past that were living in them, I've known bands that rented them so they could "practice" and while this may not look like a neighborhood from Rodney Parham, there are indeed houses behind this lot. I personally - wouldn't want the lights, the activity (there are people who like to visit around 3am for unknown & questionable reasons), the crime that decided to hit someone's home while hitting the storage facility or pets that could wander in, get trapped and the owner may not be back for 6 months. I am all for a store, restaurant/bar that generates more useful revenue - anything that draws people for more than just the "I can't throw away my stuff' storage center. from Id ago I have to agree with all the well stated concerns and would hope for only one and not three! Tracy Crain from Briarwood Someone pointed out to me that if the business ever closes, we could end up with abandoned storage houses. That could become a haven for all types of activity. frown Id ago While our LR planning commission does an outstanding job, I agree with all replies that this would be "overkill" and could damage our property values. (No date for the meeting was mentioned.... hope it's not too late for another reply) - - Pat O'Donoghue, Wingate from 3d ago If it involves a zoning change I would be against. I would rather see retail or a restaurant better yet a bar. from 3d ago They usually come with a lot of lighting. While that may add security for some, I find it is not an attractive addition to the neighborhood. Look at the facility just off of 1-630 and Rodney Parham, as an example. if we keep adding storage facilities, we seem to be making our neighborhood a warehouse area. E Ham I own a storage facility (it is in Sherwood) and while .I'm not concerned with competition, here are some points to consider. That the ENTIRE facility be well lit 24/7/365 Will there be 24 hr access? Will it be (the units) be fenced in or otherwise protected? Will there be vehicles parked as well? Will there be an onsite manager 24/7? My business is in the county and without the security features that I have listened, it will be a crime magnet. I don't have an objection to the business per se, being next to Red Lobster but unless it is done correctly, it will be an eyesore and a crime problem. Again, I am all for folks starting new businesses but they must be done correctly or our neighborhood will go down the tubes. Have they given you a specific address or is "around Red Lobster" the best location for you to use? I ask because it seems like they are wanting to change zoning and that *might* be an effort to use what is now residential property that is a cross the street from Red Lobster. The Red Lobster side is already (obviously) commercial and a storage business isn't radically different from what is already there. if I owned a house/lot across from RL or the UPS Store, I could easily understand wanting to maximize my return by selling or developing my property right across the street. By the same token, if I had a home on choctaw, , for example, I *might* not want my neighborhood turning commercial. My business is on 67 / 167 at the Sherwood exit and before I installed tons of tights, cameras and extra employees, it wasn't unusual to find people "hooking up" instead of a motel to attempting to set up meth labs! Because I'm 'electronically impaired' (which my 2 sons think is absurdly hilarious -:(....I'm wondering if it would be possible for someone to conjure up a petition of sorts that could be signed via our Nextdoor group, showing just how many people object to having ANOTHER storage unit built in our environs........ Maybe that would inspire some to 'blink and RE -think, at the meeting next week. We started an online petition this afternoon. It can be located here: http://www.i petiti on s. com/peti ti on/mi d-town-resi dents-agai n st-rodney-parham -storage cup.doc APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLATINUM SELF STORAGE Zoning Case File No. Z- Planning Commission Meeting docketed for August 25, 2016 at 4:00 PM. CG o /01 / 10 Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of Act 186 of 1957, Acts of Arkansas, as amended, and Chapter 36 of Little Rock, Ark. Rev. Code (1988), as amended, requesting a Conditional Use Permit on the following property: Address: 102 South Rodney Parham Road, Little Rock, AR 72205 General Location: South side of Rodney Parham Road, t300 Feet south of West Markham Street Property Description: Part of the North 1/2 of the SW 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 13 West, in the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron pipe at the Southeast comer of Lot 1, Skaggs-Albertsons Subdivision and being 200 feet East of the Southwest corner of the said North 1/2 SW 1/4 NE 1/4; thence South 87 degrees 51 minutes 08 seconds East for 200.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 57 minutes 12 seconds East for 150.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence South 87 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds East for 58.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve tuming to the left through an angel of 12 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds, having a radius of 188.38 feet, and whose long chord bears North 87 degrees 02 minutes 27 seconds East for 42.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 09 degrees 21 minutes 34 seconds West for 50.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve turning to the right through an angle of 10 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds, having a radius of 138.38 feet and whose long chord bears South 86 degrees 01 minutes 52 seconds West for 26.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve turning to the right through an angle of 02 degrees 01 minutes 1 I seconds, having a radius of 138.38 feet, and whose long chord bears North 87 degrees 34 minutes 07 seconds West 4.88 feet to an 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 87 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West for 95.10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 01 degrees 23 minutes 36 seconds East for 96.37 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence north 26 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds East for 106.70 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe on the Southerly right of way line of Rodney Parham Road; thence North 61 degrees 26 minutes 33 seconds West along said Southerly right of way line for 125.80 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe and the Easterly line of said Lot 1; thence South 39 degrees 06 minutes 27 seconds West for 156.39 feet along said Easterly line to a 5/8 inch rebar; thence continue along said Easterly line South 02 degrees 23 minutes 27 seconds West for 324.84 feet to the point of beginning. Title to this property is vested in: King Chow & Jasmine Lin, Husband & Wife. 976 Mirror Lake Lane, Cordova, TN, 38018 Subject property is presently zoned: C-3, General Commercial District cup.doc Pape Two 03/01/10 A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow use of the property for: Conditioned Storage / Miniwarehouse There are not private restrictions pertaining to the proposed use. Variances: 1. A variance is requested to allow a street buffer reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet. Buyer/Developer: Platinum Construction, 1834 South FM551, Fate, TX 75819 It is hereby agreed that the required filing fee will be paid immediately and the posting of the sign furnished will be accomplished as required. ,AGENT: gle7lopment Consultants, Inc. BY- RubM W. Brown 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 Tel: 501-221-7880 Cell: 501-804-7881 EMAIL: rbrown@dci-lr.com Planning Commission �Pve � ,- _ r Conditions of Approval: a r t r '�^�� lc; fi iL1_ Board of Directors Approved: Ordinance Number: Conditions of Approval: :J . City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 23, 2016 Tracy Crain 324 Carpenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of Platinum Self Storage Conditional Use Permit. Dear Ms. Crain: I have received your letter in which you state your desire to appeal the Planning Commission's approval of Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse conditional use permit located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. The item will be placed on the Board of Directors' October 18 2016 Agenda to set the date of public hearing for November 1, 2016. Board of Directors meetings are held in the Board Room, Second Floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham Street. The meetings begin at 6.:00 p.m. As the appellant, you are responsible for notification of the public hearing. You must send a notice to all record objectors and all parties who were notified of the Planning Commission hearing. I have included a notice form for your use. In addition to the list from the abstract company, you need to notify the neighborhood associations and record participants. I have attached that additional list. Do not send the notice until after the October 18, 2016 Board meeting to be sure that the public hearing is set for November 1, 2016. The notices do need to be sent via certified mail no later than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Proof of notice, as for the Commission meeting, must be returned to me no later than the Friday prior to the date of the public hearing. Failure to comply with the notice requirement as stated above will result in withdrawal of the appeal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 501-371-6817 or dcamr v,- i:litderock.or Sincerely, Dana Carney Zoning & Subdivision Manager cc: Tony Bozynski, Director of Planning and Development Susan Langley, City Clerk Pie 3 Owners. Legal DescriRtions: Randy Marr Lot 1, Bradley Home Demonstration Club Addn 1020 Oakwood Drive Instrument No. 99 27010 Wynne AR 72396 Miramar Prope,-ties LLC Lot 1, Jim Garner Addition 202 S Rodney Parham Road Instrument No. 2006-79107 Little Rock AR 72205-4710 Sean & Charmaine Smith Lot 7, Brook Park Addition 301 Bro okpark Drive Instrument No. 200126884 Little RockAR 72205 ARCP RL Portfolio PILL C Lot 1, Skagg Albertson Addition 2325 E Camelback Road - Suite I100 Instrument No. 2014-47318 Phoenix AZ 85016 SASFamily Trust Part ofLois I & 2, Satterf `field Subdivision Unrec clo Kurt Braun Schneiter Instrument No. 2010-50959 3633 E Broadway UT 100 Long Beach CA 90803 King Chow & Jasmine Lin Part of Lot 2, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 976 Mirror Lake Lane Instrument No. 2010-12420 Cordova TV 38018 W WRealty Co. Lots 4 & 6, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 13 Wirg/ield Circle InstrumentNo. 81-00268 Little RockAR 72205 page 4 Owners: Lggal Descriptions: Pendleton Properties LLC Lot 5, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec PO Box 55445 InstrumentNo. 2006-09499 Little Rock.AR 72215 Bill Lamb Lot 15 Exc S75 , Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 220 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 94-71759 Little RockAR 72205 Rose Bradley Revocable Living Trust S75' ofLot 15, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 224 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2008-79873 Little RockAR 72205 Insurance X-Change Inc Lot 18 & W15' of 19, Satterfield Sub Unrec 212 S Rodney Parham Road Instrument No. 93 21089 Little RockAR 72205 Mostafa Loth-Gelian Lot 4, Sunnymeade Addition 7210 Illinois Street Instrument No. 2004-65569 Little RockAR 72202 James Edheimer Lot 5, Sunnymeade Addition 323 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2005-39173 Little RockAR 72202 Robert Shaver Lot 6, Sunnymeade Addition Joseph Shaver Instrument No. 2005101788 12824 Cherry Laurel Drive Little RockAR 72211 Prase 5 Owners: Legal Descr,-tions: Michael Smith Lot 7, Sunnymeade Addition 312 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2011-28998 Little Rock AR 72205 K & HProperdes LLC Lot 8, Sunnymeade Addition 4804 Bella Rosa Drive Instrument No. 2002-116470 Little Rock AR 72223 Lillian Kendrick Lot 9, Sunnymeade Addition Lisa Fay Kendrick Instrument No. 94-20107 312 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Roberto Aqui Lot 10, Sunnymeade Addition Raymund Aqui Instrument No. 2009-66617 320 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Tracy Crain Lot 11, Sunnymeade Addition 324 Carpenter Drive Instrument No. 2004-14049 Little RockAR 72205 Dolores Mapili Lot 12, Sunnymeade Addition Ernesto Mapili Instrument No. 2001-53876 400 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Alonzo & Sharon Burba Lot 31, Sunnymeade Addition & part of Lot 17 223 Avignon Cir Satterfield Subdivision Unrec Little RockAR 72223 Instrument No. 2008-64134 ADDIITONAL PERSONS TO BE NOTIFIED: Mary Julia Hill 6907 Carrilon Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 >3 e rto A[� 320 � ter Dr. ��� Litre Rock, AR 7 Jacob Luggs 8407 West Markham Little Rock AR 72205 Robert Brown Development Consultants Inc. 2200 N. Rodney Parham Rd., Suite 220 Little Rock, AR 72212 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION NOVEMBER 1, 2016 AGENDA Subject A Resolution rescinding the Planning Commission's action in approving a conditional use permit to allow a conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. (Z-8629-B) Submitted By: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Action Required Ordinance Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce Moore A record objector is appealing the Planning Commission's approval of a conditional use permit to allow a three-story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. I None Denial of the Resolution, approval of the conditional use permit. On August 25, 2016, the Planning Commission, by a vote of 8 ayes, 1 noe and 2 absent, approved a conditional use permit to allow for construction of a three-story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. There were four (4) registered objectors present and staff had received two (2) e-mails of opposition which had been delivered to the commissioners. BACKGROUND CONTINUED The property was formerly occupied by a restaurant. The building has been removed. The remnants of the asphalt and concrete parking lot remain. Access to the site is via driveways off of Rodney Parham Road and Sunnymeade Drive. The site will not be gated or fenced other than for screening fencing along the south and east perimeters where the site is adjacent to residential uses. Parking spaces will be provided at the front of the site for use by persons accessing the office or the small number of ground -floor storage units with outside access. The building is designed to have vehicles pull through the interior for loading and unloading. Elevators will provide access to the second and third floors. There will be no outside access to any of the units. All units will be interior -access only. The building will have a height of 36 feet with a parapet extending to 40 feet to screen the roof -mounted mechanical units. The C-3 district has a height limit of 35 feet and a variance is requested for the additional foot of building height. The facility will contain approximately 750 units. There will not be an on -site manager's apartment. Signage will consist of two ground signs; one on the Sunnymeade perimeter and one on the Rodney Parham perimeter as well as wall signage on the north and east facades, facing the Rodney Parham and Sunnymeade Street frontages. The ground sign on Sunnymeade will be an 8 foot tall 6 feet wide, 48 square foot monument sign. The sign on the Rodney Parham frontage will be up to 36 feet in height and 160 square feet in area. Site lighting will consist of wall mounted light fixtures mounted to the walls of the building at an elevation of 9 feet above the finished floor. The lighting will be aimed downward and into the site. There will be no pole mounted lights. The applicant proposes to use the existing dumpster enclosure location at the northeast corner of the site. The trash enclosure will be block masonry with wooden gates. The building itself will have an exterior finish of split faced block, brick, EIFS with steel decorative panels. The colors will be earth -toned. The building will have the appearance of an office building. There will be no outside storage of boats, campers, etc... 2 BACKGROUND CONTINUED No businesses will be permitted to operate within the storage units. Storage of flammable materials is not permitted. Office hours are 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m., Saturdays and noon — 5:00 p.m., Sundays. Tenant access to the units will be 6:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m. daily. Please see the attached Planning Commission minutes for the complete analysis and commission action. 3 I RESOLUTION NO. 2 3 A RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE LITTLE ROCK 4 PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION IN APPROVING 5 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A 6 CONDITIONED MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITY ON 7 THE C-3 ZONED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 102 SOUTH RODNEY PARHAM ROAD (Z-8629-B). 9 10 WHEREAS, an application was filed for a conditional use permit to allow for 11 the construction of a three-story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility to be located on 12 the C-3 zoned property at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road; and, 13 14 WHEREAS, the Little Rock Planning Commission, at its August 25, 2016 15 meeting, approved the conditional use permit application with a vote of 8 ayes, 1 noe 16 and 2 absent; and, 17 18 WHEREAS, a record objector has appealed the Planning Commission's 19 action in approving said conditional use permit; and, 20 21 WHEREAS, the Little Rock Board of Directors has determined that the 22 action of the Little Rock Planning Commission in approving said conditional use 23 permit to be inappropriate. 24 25 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF 26 DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. ►% 28 SECTION 1. The action of the Little Rock Planning Commission in 29 approving a conditional use permit to allow a three-story conditioned mini -warehouse 30 facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 South Rodney Parham Road is 31 hereby rescinded. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 SECTION 2. Said conditional use permit is hereby denied. SECTION 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. PASSED: ATTEST: Susan Langley, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney // APPROVED: Mark Stodola, Mayor 2 PD-0 7 ' Z - ;6 a 03 m CUP Vicinity Map O p o tC3 o da r �C3 � I + d CUP �:! p I R5 ' x! htkF18 � f'I 03 C31 0 WMARKHAM•ST THIS SITE -Y - J R4 IW SR r o DpN�Yp v O D3 o 1r ' R2 PCD Eli .0' Cj !) W EAPfTQ�AVE CUP � � �j r— PR-R �r Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development Rev: 7/19/20161 Case: Z-8629-B Location: 102 South Rodney Parham Ward:6 PD: 3 CT: 21.03 TRS: TIN R13W 2 N 0 125 250 Feet R2 I 6 r Lar 11 h'n- Sketch City of Little Rock Planning &Development Case No: Z-8629-B Name: Platinum Self Storage / Warehouse Location: 102 Rodney Parham Issue: CUP Op Oil OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION OCTOBER 18, 2016 AGENDA Subject A Resolution to set the public hearing for November 1, 2016 on an appeal of the Planning Commission's action in approving a conditional use permit to allow a conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. (Z-8629-B) Submitted By: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Action Required Ordinance Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce Moore City Manage. A record objector is appealing the Planning Commission's approval of a conditional use permit to allow a conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. I None Approval of the Resolution setting the public hearing. On August 25, 2016, the Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow a three-story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. The Commission's vote was 8 ayes, 1 noe and 2 absent. A record objector is appealing that approval. 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO SET NOVEMBER 1, 2016 AS THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S ACTION IN APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CONDITIONED MINI -WAREHOUSE FACILITY ON THE C-3 ZONED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 102. S. RODNEY PARHAM ROAD (Z-8629-B); AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, a Notice of Appeal has been filed as a result of the Planning Commission's approval of a conditional use permit to allow a conditioned mini - warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. The hearing on the Notice of Appeal of the approval of a conditional use permit to allow a conditioned mini -warehouse facility on the C-3 zoned property located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road (Z-8629-B) shall be held at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock in the Board Room of City Hall at six o'clock on the Is' day of November, 2016. SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of such hearing in the manner prescribed by law by publication once a week for two (2) conservative weeks in a newspaper published in Pulaski County, Arkansas, and having a general circulation in the City of Little Rock. f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 PASSED: ATTEST: Susan Langley, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney APPROVED: Mark Stodola, Mayor 2 PD;43ti Cb 0 103 EK < Nil C R2 CUP Vicinity Map o C3 c do Q �� C � C3} UP 10 R5 17 4 is �, , ; E L� I 3 CUP 0C31� - � 7-7 THIS SITE R4 X 03 R2 r] C, LU PCD rmlI 1ri R2- CUP Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development Rev: 7/19/2016 1 Case: Z-8629-B Location: 102 South Rodney Parham Ward: 6 PD: 3 CT 21.03 TRS: TIN RI 3W 2 N A 0 125 250 IMMME:�� Feet 6 ti LOT 11 /?h- Sketch City of Little Rock Planning &Development Case No: Z-8629-B Name: Platinum Self Storage / Warehouse Location: 102 Rodney Parham Issue: CUP N k cup.doc APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLATINUM SELF STORAGE Zoning Case File No. Z-_ YL Commission Meeting docketed for August 25, 2016 at 4:00 PM. Application is hereby made to the Little Rock Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of Act 186 of 1957, Acts of Arkansas, as amended, and Chapter 36 of Little Rock, Ark. Rev. Code (1988), as amended, requesting a Conditional Use Permit on the following property: Address: 102 South Rodney Parham Road, Little Rock, AR 72205 General Location: South side of Rodney Parham Road, ±300 Feet south of West Markham Street Property Description: Part of the North 1 /2 of the SW 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 13 West, in the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a 5/8 inch iron pipe at the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Skaggs-Albertsons Subdivision and being 200 feet East of the Southwest corner of the said North 1/2 SW 1/4 NE 1/4; thence South 87 degrees 51 minutes 08 seconds East for 200.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 57 minutes 12 seconds East for 150.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence South 87 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds East for 58.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve turning to the left through an angel of 12 degrees 48 minutes 03 seconds, having a radius of 188.38 feet, and whose long chord bears North 87 degrees 02 minutes 27 seconds East for 42.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 09 degrees 21 minutes 34 seconds West for 50.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve turning to the right through an angle of 10 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds, having a radius of 138.38 feet and whose long chord bears South 86 degrees 01 minutes 52 seconds West for 26.00 feet to the beginning of a curve and a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence along said curve turning to the right through an angle of 02 degrees 01 minutes 11 seconds, having a radius of 138.38 feet, and whose long chord bears North 87 degrees 34 minutes 07 seconds West 4.88 feet to an 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 87 degrees 54 minutes 48 seconds West for 95.10 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence North 01 degrees 23 minutes 36 seconds East for 96.3 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thence north 26 degrees 02 minutes 15 seconds East for 106.70 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe on the Southerly right of way line of Rodney Parham Road; thence North 61 degrees 26 minutes 33 seconds West along said Southerly right of way line for 125.80 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe and the Easterly line of said Lot 1; thence South 39 degrees 06 minutes 27 seconds West for 156.39 feet along said Easterly line to a 5/8 inch rebar; thence continue along said Easterly line South 02 degrees 23 minutes 27 seconds West for 324.84 feet to the point of beginning. Title to this property is vested in: King Chow & Jasmine Lin, Husband & Wife. 976 Mirror Lake Lane, Cordova, TN, 38018 Subject property is presently zoned: C-3, General Commercial District cup.doc 03/01 / 10 Page Two A Conditional Use Permit is requested to allow use of the property for: Conditioned Storage / Miniwarehouse There are not private restrictions pertaining to the proposed use. Variances: 1. A variance is requested to allow a street buffer reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet. Buyer/Developer: Platinum Construction, 1834 South FM551, Fate, TX 75819 It is hereby agreed that the required filing fee will be paid immediately and the posting of the sign furnished will be accomplished as required. AGENT: Devplopment Consultants, Inc. BY: Rob _-Brown 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 Tel: 501-221-7880 Cell: 501-804-7881 EMAIL: rbrown@dci-lr.com Planning Commission �Pve- Conditions of Approval: Board of Directors Approved: 1111 �'��O 14.J) o w �i Ordinance Number: IA AW' AJ �Y" 3 S ' "Y f Wd 11 Conditions of Approval: Ll 17 LE P, uATM AS Jy L�11v re a c��1 711 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED July 18, 2016 Mr. Monte Moore City of Little Rock Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: Platinum Self -Storage — Conditional Use Permit Application 102 South Rodney Parham Road Dear Monte: Enclosed are our application documents for the above referenced Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application. The following items are provided for your use in reviewing this application: 1. Three copies of our current boundary and topographic survey. 2. Eighteen copies of the proposed site plan (provided by the developer) 3. Completed CUP application form. I am in the process of obtaining the owner forms to authorize DCi to act as agent and to agree to right-of-way dedications that may be required. I will submit these forms as soon as possible. This project proposal is for the development of a three story conditioned storage facility on the subject 1.86 acre property. The property is presently zoned C-3; General Commercial District, which allows "ministorage" as a conditional use with Planning Commission approval. The property is presently vacant and was previously used as a restaurant. There are existing remnants of the paved parking areas at the site, however, the building has been removed We propose to use the existing points of access from South Rodney Parham and Sunnymeade Drive to serve the project. There will be open parking at the north end of the site, and there will be gated/secured access to enter the building and other drive areas. This building is designed to have vehicles pull through the interior for loading and unloading so the need for vehicle access to the exterior of the building is only necessary on the eastern side. Please contact my office if you have any questions or require additional information Thank you for your assistance in this process. Sincerely, Development Consultants Incorporated ARobe Brown Vice President G:\2O16\16-169\Planning\Documents\16006-002 doc Engineering a Planning ° Land Surveying ° Landscape Architecture 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220 • Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 • Telephone 501-221-7880 - Fax 501-221-7882 609 West Dickson Street, Suite 205A • Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 • Telephone 479-444-7800 Y e y I g m o PROPOSED NEW BUILDING FOR: PLANTINUM SELF -STORAGE x 102 S. RODNEY PARHAM RD. .u.wuie.r..w� rw LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72212 Beach Abstract & Guaranty Company, Inc. 100 Center Street - P.O. Box 2580 Little Rock, AR 72203 (501) 376-5652 Telephone (501) 376-5667 Facsimile Email: ddavisP.beachahst.cam August 2, 2016 Development Consultants Inc Attn: Robert Brown 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road - Suite 220 Little Rock AR 72212 Beach No. S16-7018 — Update Chow King & Jasmine Lin 102 S Rodney Parham Road - Little Rock AR RE: Part of the North j of the SW i NE + of Settler, 2, Tawn" t Nr+rfh, Range 13 WW. In th* laity of LittIt Ruck, Pulaafd County, Arkanaoa, mare particularty described as faawa: 8891nning at a 5/8 inch iraii plea at the Southeast corner of Lot 1. 4*—Albartsons SubtI%falon and boring 266 feet Ecu► of the Sawlhwest tamer of the said N rth j SW i HE J: thence South 7 dkgrsys 51 minutes G8 barmndu Eaut for 200.00 feet; theMe Nortth 02 6agrsna 57 ninutrn 12 ai nonda EWt For 150.00 feet to a 5/6 inch Iron ghee: thence South 87 degrees 54 minutes 49 seconds Fort Far SA.on F"t t8 the heginnlrg of a curve and a 5/8 inch iron pipe; thanco along sold curve turning to the left through an angel of 12 dogrees 40 minutea 03 limuf0s, tgavtnq a radius of I6a,3lt feet. did Wilifie long chord bears North 87 degrees 02 minutes 27 itaconda East for 42_tln ra.f fin q 5/8 fnO Iran pipe; thsrKa Ftarth 09 dsgraaa 21 minutaq 34 wennde Heat for 50.00 Net to the beginning of a curve and 5/8 Inch iron pipe: them cWg maid curve turning to the right through CA dflgla of 10 degrees 40 minutaa 52 seconds, having a radius of 138.38 fact and Whnae long chore! heart 5o4:th 53 degrrfv aT mt—im 62 aarondo [Vogt to 2040 rant to use trrr IWINLy of u wive u«J a 3/8 InCh I= pipe; LnefK5 0101tg said curve turning to the right through an acids of 02 degrees Ot mIwtss t1 seconds, having a rc41_L9 Of 138.38 fad a;nd whose long shard bevta North 67 degrees 34 minutis 47 aacands Weat 4.88 feet to an 5/8 Inch Iron pipe, therite North 07 degrtiasa 54 rrrFnuUw 48 >fsconda ~elect for 95.10 f"t to a 5/8 +nth Iron pipe; thence North 01 degrees 23 rrdnutas 38 "Cara'* Frgrt far 06L37 fwt to a 5/8 inch town pips; thenoo na,th 26 dogmas 02 minutzss 15 aacar►ds Eust for 106.70 font to a 5/8 Inch iron ptpe on the Southerly right of way line of Rodney r arhom Rood; thence Morlh 81 degrees 26 rninutes 33 saccnde Wert ofatg said Southerly rlgfrt of way line for 125.60 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pipe and the Easterly line of saki l.ot 1; thence 3autli 36 degrees 06 +minutm 27 Gacomijs [Vest The 15B.3if tact along sold Eaetarly litre ba a 5A inch nsbar: thence cunkinus along mold E,uterty pne Squth 02 dtgrets 23 minvtas 27 r+rande Wort for 324.84 feei to tha pant of beginning. Page 2 Dear Mr. Brown: We have examined the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas, up to July 10, 2016 at 7:00 A.M. as to the property lying within 200 feet to the above described property, to wit: We find that the owners names set out on the attached sheets lie within 200 feet of the above described property and that the names are the last apparent owners of record of said property. I have checked the records of the Pulaski County Circuit Clerks Office and find no record of a Plat or Bill of Assurance filed and recorded for Satterfield Subdivision in Little Rock, Pulaski County Arkansas We do not certify as to the validity of title and our liability is limited to the amount paid for this service. If we can be of further service to you, please call us. A'I cerel}F, Donna Davis Special Service Department 501-376-5652 Enclosure(s) �Y6n'I -11-o�x` Cl �o g � � - r 41� 11 la Ole_ curs (Im 1 03/01/10 CONOITIONAI, USE PERMIT STREET RIGHT-Ok-WAY DEDICATION AGREEMENT LOCATION/ADDRESS: ] ) South Rqd cy Parham Road, Little, Rook, AR 1? ?U5 DATE: July 18, 2016 DOCKETED FOR MEETING ON: Au�ust 25, 2016 At 4:00 PM I I, King Chow &- Jasmine Lin; Uusband & wife, do hereby agree to dedicate to the public any needed rif,'171 O -W',Iy a- I-egUired by the Ninstez' Street Plan tot- a public street abutting property owlted by me a jacem to tb: property rcquestcd fora e6ik itictttal use permit. 1, Ring Chwvv & Jtistuillc l.,iU, 11USNAIld I wifc.. agree to provide of my expense ,In casement deed aud."or 0111k r do,mment3 aq Ile s,'.ary wily -vil7 s1101) right of way to Ilse public- -I OWNER: �4c'_ DATI�' y ifKing,Chow ' ._.., .._ . I OWNER: - _ DATE Jt ti,ite J.iu I - - i Smt� pl ' Gounsy al I1 3 Wtar ag Inagpmnrrt ir�g� ° bplur° mq tllliIrd Jay— �y° ['Yp�stbi+Mf+CrTlort rerl,�identlllaiti°,n_ I - .SiF;ft: i71• �sY :-, rti�t�iFlrtY PEIE3t.tL' 3 cxrp drx; 1 03/01l10 AFFIDAVIT i r I. K i a a CtIow &, .lastttrne 1,i.ti, huxhm(I & wife, s r1iffy by vvi Sinn ttIIJT.S bCIUW t!l tl "-Q Ilei r-br 8LltlMl-i/.c 1)cN'elopnieitt corfsult,Ut6, Inc. to act as utu agctn regaidirte TIM1 Coudurunatl Use Permit ri})pi!catkw of the below cl(•scribecl plopwly Part of the Notch 112 Of thv SW 1?4 NE Ir4 ofS`ction 7, Township I North, Range 13 West, in the City of•I.,ittle Kuck, Pulaski Cotlelty, A)kamas, inure particul¢u'ly Jewribed as l:uila„•s• Begiuuulg at a 518 inch iron pipe at the Soullwast ('ornet of Lot I, Skans,A]Imrtsom Subdivi:tis_nn and bein .200 feet i:ast of the Southwest comer of the said North 1;2 SW I/,I NE 114; dterme youth 87 degrees 51 tuin ites 08 seentxds htlm for 200.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 57 nruiutcs 12 s(•.conds last 16s- 1 S0.00 feet to rt S, 8 'inch iron pipe; thence S kmth 87 degrees A muuites 48 seconds East for 58.00 fret to the begiluling o1• a etuve and R 5'8 inch iron pine, Mcmce alutlg sai( curve nirnitig to the left through an angel of 12 degrees 48 ntitutes 03 seecriodt, having 6 nadius of 188 38 feet, and wll se long chord bears forth 87 degrees 02 minutes 1,7 seconds Fast for 42 00 feet to a S:$ blclt i -ou pipe; thence North 09 deg c:es 2I minutes 34 seconds 6 est for 50.00 feet to the begbmirlg of a curve and 5'z{ inch it -on pipe; thence alortg, said curve 1.011Lng to titre right through an angle of 10 degrees 46 ivib*mtes 52 seconds, havbig a radius of 138.18 feet and whose long c lord bears South 86 degrees 01 mimites 52 seconds West for 26.00 feet to the begmining of a r;urVe And a 518 inch iron pipe, th -rtre along said curve turning to the rioJu throtigJ) an angle of 02. des,Xees 01 mbium 11 seconds, haying a mdim of 138.38 f et;'and ■yhose long chor(1 beats North 87 degrees 14 lnv-iutes 07 secuncls %%'rst 4.88 Feet to ant 518 inch it•on pipe; thence l of th 87 degrees 5,1 nihimes 48 seconds West for 95.10 feet to a S; 8 inch iron pipe; thence North 01 degrees 23 nibittl2s 16 se odds East for 96.3'J feel to a 5'4 uich ill m pipe; thence uorth 26 tle;_rees 02 minutes 15 seconds East tot' 106.70fee( to a 5.81wch iron pipe on the tioutllerly tt};ht of way line ofRodne) I'aritam Koad. thence North 61 degrees 26 minutes 33 seconds West along said Southerly nglit of way line for 125 30 tret to a 5 8 uich iron pipe alid the E'u terly Itne ot. slid 1. of 1, thence Suourh 39 (IE;tii'eeg iJ6 r.nUllltF'•S .?'.' seconds 14�est tar ] 7b 39 frrt clung Bald Easterly line to a 518 then-, rebar. thence coritinurj alum said 1i;tsterlvv lilac South 02 degrees 23 munrres '7 seconds West for 324 84 feet to the pouts of be.nurulK 51.pnatttres of •Title 13olders f _�. Date: Kw (:how / i ��•�� Date: .7as r.ina I.tn � I I SubscTib d :cud sworn to rue a Notary Public on this day of - Natal :uw - N9}, C onlntrssnJu l:xpire-s: - -Ir'� c 0/ ' --_ -- .l - Ak Enter (7y July 25, 2016 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development ATTN: Ms. Donna James, AICP 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Entergy Arkansas Inc. #9 Entergy Court Little Rock, AR 72211 RE: Entergy comments related to Planning and Zoning items for the August 25" Meeting Ms. James, Please find below Entergy's comments related to the items received from the Department of Planning and Development last week. The request letter said to have the comments back to you by August V, 2016. ■ Platinum Self Storage — 102 S. Rodney Parham: Z-8629-B Entergy does not object to this proposal. An overhead power line exists on the south side of the property, but should not be in the way of construction. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • LR Technology Park Comm Parking Lot — 400 Block of Main St.: Z-9155 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical facilities are buried in this area and no change of location or use is required due to this proposal for the parking lot change. Phillips Duplexes — NW corner of Holt and W 38" : Z-9154 Entergy does not object to this proposal. A single phase power line exists on the west side of this property. One single phase line is on the SW corner of the property and another one is close to the NW corner of the property. There do not appear to be any existing conflicts with Entergy facilities on this property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. + Deal revised short form — 909 S. Cumberland: Z-6734-F Entergy does not object to this proposal. Power lines exist in the area, but should not conflict with the change of use to add the professional office in the existing structure. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss adjustments to service requirements to the structure (if any) as this project proceeds. Hindu Temple of Central AR — 19430 Lawson Rd.: Z-9153 Entergy does not object to this proposal. A single phase power line exists on the SE side of this property and another one on the west side of this property in the vicinity of this proposed construction. There do not appear to be any existing conflicts with Entergy facilities on this property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss future service requirements, new facilities locations and adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Lowdermilk Accessory Dwelling — 221 Linwood Court: Z-9152 Entergy does not object to this proposal. However, a power line exists in the rear of this property with an electrical service line feeding the existing structure(s). Please contract Entergy in advance to ensure that service needs are understood and met, and that clearances can be double checked to any proposed construction to ensure that NESC and OSHA required clearances are maintained during the process. If you need further assistance you may call me at 501-954-5158 or e-mail me at bneumei@entergy.com. Sincerely, Bernard Neumeier Region Engineering Supervisor Entergy Arkansas, Inc. To: Dana Carney Date: June 13, 2016 From: Captain Tony Rhodes / Captain John Hogue: Fire Marshal Comment for the following Locations: Z-9155 400 Block of Main Street Maintain Access Z-9154 NW Corner of Holt and West 38th Full plan review Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol- 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200. Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Z-6734-F 909 South Cumberland Full plan review Z-9152 221 Linwood Court Full plan review Z-8629-B Maintain Access: Fire Hydrants. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at fire hydrant locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders. Grade Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.2 Grade. Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade except as approved by the fire chief. Loading Maintain fire apparatus access road design as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D102.1 Access and loading. Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least 75,000 pounds. Commercial and Industrial Developments-2 means of access._ - Maintain fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet in height. Building or facilities exceeding 30 feet or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure. Section D104.2 Building exceeding 62,000 square feet in area. Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet shall be provide with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all building are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems. D104.3 Remoteness. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 30' Tall Buildings - Maintain aerial fire apparatus access roads as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D105.1— D105.4 D105.1 Where Required. Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceed 30', approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. For the purposes of this section the highest roof surfaces shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of a roof to the exterior wall, or the top of the parapet walls, whichever is greater. D105.2 Width. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed with of 26', exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. D105.3 Proximity to building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. D105.4 Obstructions. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be places with the approval of the fire code official. Dead Ends. Maintain fire apparatus access roads at dead end locations as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with Table D103.4. Requirements for Dead-end fire apparatus access roads. Gates Maintain fire apparatus access road gates as per Appendix D of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code Vol. 1 Section D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates. Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all of the following criteria: 1. Minimum gate width shall be 20 feet. 2. Gates shall be of swinging or sliding type. 3. Construction of gates shall be of material that allow manual operation by one person. 4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operable condition at all times and replaces or repaired when defective. 5. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening devices shall be approved by the fire code official. 6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible entry tools or when a key box containing the keys to the lock is installed at the gate location. 7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval \by the fire code official 8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. 9. Gates, intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with requirements of ASTM F 2200, Fire Hydrants Locate Fire Hydrants as per Appendix C of the 2012 Arkansas Fire Prevention Code. Section C101— C105, in conjunction with Central Arkansas Water (Daniel Tull 501-377-1245) and the Little Rock Fire Marshals Office (Capt. Tony Rhodes 501-918-3757 or Capt. John Hogue 501-918-3754). Number and Distribution of Fire Hydrants as per Table C105.1. Regards, Captain Rhodes and Captain Hogue Office: 918-3710 Rock Region AvAd METRO Rock Region METRO Planning and Subdivision Review 1/iz=0 To: City of Little Rock Planning and Development, Donna James, Monte Moore, Dana Carney From: Kathleen Lambert, Sr. Transit Planner Date: July 27, 2o16 Re: Subdivision Reviews Aug 3, 2os6 hearing 1) Z-9155 Little Rock Technology Commercial Parking lot, 400 Main St. a) Location is currently served by METRO by multiple routes along Capital Ave. We don't object to the conditional use of the lot as commercial parking. We would like to encourage the future development of the site to match more intensive land use indicative of a vibrant downtown. z) Z- 9154 Phillips Duplexes; Holt and 38th Sts. a) Location is served currently by Route 9, John Barrow and Route 14, Rosedale. We have no objection to increased housing in this neighborhood and encourage the redevelopment of vacant lots close to transit. 3) Z-6734-F 9o9 South Cumberland St; PDR Home Instead, Senior Care Business a) Location is served by METRO along 9th St at Cumberland by several routes. We have no objection to the conditional use permit in this neighborhood. 4) Z-9153 Hindu Temple of Arkansas, 1943o Lawson Road a) Location is not currently served by METRO. We have no objections to this development. 5) Z-9152 221 Linwood Court, Residence Conditional use permit a) Location is served by METRO on Route 8 Rodney Parham. We have no objections to this conditional use permit for and accessory building with studio apartment on second floor. 6) Z- 8629-B Platinum Self -storage; loz South Rodney Parham Road a) Location is currently served by METRO on Route 5 one of top routes in the system. The proposed mini -storage development is a low density land use along a high use transit corridor. The location is also surrounded by (4) other storage facilities within one mile. We feel the property would be better utilized for its current zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW CENTRAL ARKANSAS WATER 03 August 2016 NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS PLATINUM SELFSTORAGE MINI- Z-8629-B All Central Arkansas Water requirements in WAREHOUSE effect at the time of request for water service must be met. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system. If there are facilities that need to be adjusted and/or relocated, contact Central Arkansas Water. That work would be done at the expense of the developer. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS LITTLE ROCK TECHNOLOGY Z-9155 NO OBJECTIONS; All Central Arkansas PARK COMMERCIAL PARKING Water requirements in effect at the time of LOT request for water service must be met PHILLIP DUPLEXES Z-9154 NO OBJECTIONS; All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met DEAL REVISED SHORT -FORM Z-6734-F NO OBJECTIONS; All Central Arkansas PD-R Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met NAME TYPE ISSUE HINDU TEMPLE OF CENTRAL Z-9153 ARKANSAS COMMENTS All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A water main extension will be needed to provide water service to this property. The Little Rock Fire Department needs to evaluate this site to determine whether additional public and/or private fire hydrant(s) will be required. If additional fire hydrant(s) are required, they will be installed at the Developer's expense. Please submit plans for water facilities and/or fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review. Plan revisions may be required after additional review. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of water facilities and/or fire service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding the size and location of the water meter. The facilities on -site will be private. When meters are planned off private lines, private facilities shall be installed to Central Arkansas Water's material and construction specifications and installation will be inspected by an engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Arkansas. Execution of Customer Owned Line Agreement is required. Due to the nature of this facility, installation of an approved reduced pressure zone backflow preventer assembly (RPZ) is required on the domestic water service. This assembly must be installed prior to the first point of use. Central Arkansas Water (CAW) requires that upon installation of the RPZA, successful tests of the assembly must be completed by a Certified Assembly Tester licensed by the State of Arkansas and approved by CAW. The test results must be sent to CAW's Cross Connection Section within ten days of installation and annually thereafter. Contact the Cross Connection Section at 377-1226 if you would like to discuss backflow prevention requirements for this project. Fire sprinkler systems which do not contain NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone backflow preventer shall be required. 4 MEMORANDUM TO: DANA CARNEY, ZONING & SUBDIVISION MANAGER FROM: TRACY SPILLMAN, PLANS DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE BUFFER AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUGUST 3, 2016, SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JULY 29, 2016 9.09 S. Cumberland Z-6734-F No Comment 102 S Rodney Parham Road Z-8629-B Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. A land use buffer six (6) percent of the average width / depth of the lot will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar use of a more restrictive nature. The adjacent property to the south is zoned R-2. As a component of all land use buffer requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the buffer. The plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape ordinance of the city, section 15-102. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. Screening requirements will need to be met for the vehicular use areas adjacent to street right-of-ways. Provide screening shrubs with an average linear spacing of not less at three (3) feet within the required landscape area. Provide trees with an average linear spacing of not less than thirty (30) feet. Landscape areas shall be provided between the vehicular use area used for public parking and the general vicinity of the building, excluding truck loading or service areas not open to public parking. These areas shall be equal to an equivalent planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. An irrigation system shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. NW Corner of Holt & 38th Z-9154 No Comment 400 Block of Main Street West Z-9155-B No Comment 221 Linwood Court Z-9152 No Comment 19430 Lawson Road Z-9153 Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance requirements. A land use buffer six (6) percent of the average width / depth of the lot will be required when an adjacent property has a dissimilar use of a more restrictive nature. The adjacent properties are zoned R-2, and R-7A. As a component of all land use buffer requirements, opaque screening, whether a fence or other device, a minimum of six (6) feet in height shall be required upon the property line side of the buffer. The plantings, existing and purposed, shall be provided within the landscape ordinance of the city, section 15-102. A perimeter planting strip is required along any side of a vehicular use area that abuts adjoining property or the right-of-way of any street. This strip shall be at least nine (9) feet wide. One (1) tree and three (3) shrubs or vines shall be planted for every thirty (30) linear feet of perimeter planting strip. The shared dive at the south of the property must be placed on the property line or the above perimeter requirements will need to be met. Eight percent (8%) of the vehicular use area must be designated for green space; this green space needs to be evenly distributed throughout the parking area(s). The minimum size of an interior landscape area shall be one hundred fifty (150) square feet for developments with one hundred fifty (150) or fewer parking spaces. Interior islands must be a minimum of seven and one half (7 1/2) feet in width. Trees shall be included in the interior landscape areas at the rate of one (1) tree for every twelve (12) parking spaces. Building landscape areas shall be provided between the vehicular use area used for public parking and the general vicinity of the building. These shall be provided at the rate equivalent to planter strip three (3) feet wide along the vehicular use area. One (1) tree and four (4) shrubs shall be planted in the building landscape areas for each forty (40) linear feet of vehicular use area abutting the building. An automatic irrigation system to water landscaped areas shall be required for developments of one (1) acre or larger. The development of two (2) acres or more requires the landscape plan to be stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as feasible on this site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger. Public Works Review Comments Planning Commission Board of Adjustment Agenda Date: 8-25-16 Z File Number Z-6734-F Deal Revised PD-R 909 S. Cumberland St. 0 No comments Z File Number Z-8629-B Platinum Self Storage Mini -Warehouse CUP 102 S. Rodney Parham Rd I Rodney Parham St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right- of-way 45 feet from centerline will be required. 2 Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 3 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property if detention was provided with the last development. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or property owner's association. 4 If disturbed area is I or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. 5 A City of Little Rock drainage project was recently completed on both the north and south sides of the Sunnymeade driveway. The 12 inch RCP on the north side of the Sunnymead driveway and pipes downstream are believed to be undersized. At the time of the building permit, a drainage analysis should be performed to determine if existing pipe sizes are adequate. If so, the system will be required to be upsized. 6 With the proposed signage on the north side of the Rodney Parham driveway, the sight distance to the west must not be obstructed.. 7 Is the Sunnymeade driveway proposed to be one-way exit only? If not, provide call box and turnaround for a SU-30 vehicle. 8 Damage to public and private property due to hauling operations or operation of construction related equipment from a nearby construction site shall be repaired by the responsible party prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 9 The Sunnymeade Drive driveway should be one-way exit only since a turnaround is not provided. Z File Number Z-8846-A Little Rock Quarries Rezoning R-2 to M 15500 Blk Lawson Rd 0 No comments Z File Number Z-9152 Lowdermilk Accessory Dwelling 221 Linwood Court Monday, August 01, 2016 Page I of 2 0 No comments Z File Number Z-9153 Hindu Temple of Central Arkansas 19430 Lawson Rd 1 Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for stormwater detention facilities on the plan. Maintenance of the detention pond and all private drainage improvements is the responsibility of the developer and/or local property owner association. Z File Number Z-9154 Phillips Duplexes CUP NW corner of Holt St & W. 38th St. I Holt St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 2 A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Holt St. and W. 38th St. 3 The driveway should be moved further north to not place the parking spaces on 2 lots or plat a shared access easement on lots 7 and 8. Z File Number Z-9155 Little Rock Technology Park Parking Lot CUP 400 Blk Main St. 0 No comments Z File Number Z-9156 2101 Simpson St. Parolee/Probation Housing 2101 Simpson St. 0 No comments Z File Number Z-9157 1102 S. Pulaski St. Group Care Facility 1102 S. Pulaski St. 0 No comments Z File Number Z-9158 Perry's Pennies Rezoning R2 to R4 1916 & 1918 Perry St. 1 Perry St. is classified on the Master Street Plan as a Residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 2 The maximum width of the driveway for residential use is 20 ft. Monday, August 01, 2016 Page 2 of 2 To: Dana Carney, Zoning & Subdivision Manager Date: 8-1-16 Donna James, Zoning Monte Moore, Subdivision From: Curtis Richey / Mark Alderfer: Building Codes Building Code Comments: Z-8629-B 102 S. Rodney Parham Project is subject to full commercial plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submittal requirements and the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Awning must comply with 13'6' clearance requirement. Curtis Richey at 501.371.4724; crichev@littlerock.org or Mark Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@littierock.or . Z-9155 400 Block of Main Street (West) No Comment Z-9154 NW Corner of Holt & 38 Project is subject to residential plan review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Contact the permit desk at 501-371-4832 for requirements 6 Z-9153 19430 Lawson Road Project is ct to full commercial plan review and al prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on su-rernents a th review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Awning must comply with 13' ra irement. Curtis Riche�50111. 24; crichev@littlerock.org Mark 4875; malderfer@littlerock.org. Z-9152 221 Linwood Court P;Q4ec.t _�_subiect to full commercial plan review a va prior to issuance of a building permit. For information on submitta rrir -the review process, contact a commercial plans examiner: Awning must comply wi clearance requ _ Curtis crichev,@Iittleroci<.org or ---___ Mar Alderfer at 501.371.4875; malderfer@It_t_tlerock.org. Regards, Curtis Richey Commercial Plans Examiner Little Rock Wastewater Comments Project Number Z-6734-F Project Name Project Type Comment Made Deal Revised PD-R Revised PD-R Sewer Available to this site. Project Number Z-8629-B Project Name Project Type Comment Made Platinum Self Storage Conditional Use Sewer Available to this site_ Project Number Z-9152 Project Name Proiect Type Comment Made Lowdermilk Accessory Conditional Use No building to be constructed over existing 6" sewer Dwelling main (installed in 1912). Project Number Z-9153 Project Name Project Type Comment Made Hindu Temple of Central Conditional Use Outside Service Boundary - No Comment. Arkansas Project Number Z-9154 Project Name Project Type Comment Made Phillips Duplexes Conditional Use Sewer Available to this site. Separate service required for each lot. Project Number Z-9155 Project Name Project Type Comment Made Little Rock Tech Park Conditional Use Sewer Available to this site. Existing sewer in alley Comm'I Parking Lot must be retained. Monday, August 01, 2016 Page 1 of 1 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: July 19, 2016 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Briarwood Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Rex Easter ADDRESS: 6900 Lucerne Drive Little Rock. AR 72205 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a conditioned mini -warehouse facility. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 102 S. Rodnev Parham OWNED BY: King Chow and Jasmine_Lin/Platinum Self -Storage NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on August 25, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. tony Bo ski City of Littie Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: July 19.2016 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Sunnymeade Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Tracv Crain ADDRESS: 324 Camenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a conditioned mini -warehouse facility. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 102 S. Rodney Parham OWNED BY: King Chow and Jasmine Lin/Platinum Self -Storage NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on August 25, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. ■� 1 City of Little Rock CcDepartment of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 Date: July 19, 2016 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Director Doris Wright ATTENTION: ADDRESS: 3705 Cobb S Little Rock, AR 72204 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to allow for construction of a conditioned mini -warehouse facility. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 102 S. Rodney Parham OWNED BY: King Chow and Jasmine LinlPlatinum Self -Storage NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for Conditional Use Permit for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on August 25, 2016 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. ony Botnslq4 Di ector LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ■ ■ DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED � 'S ► � r, J J r WE ARE SENDING YOU [Attached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Under separate cover via the following items ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change Order ❑ •- •DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For your approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN 13�u►1►�l�;i•� COPY TO 20 SIGNED If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 2200 "forth Rodney Parhain, Suite 220 * tittle Rack, Arkansas 72212 * Telephone 501.221-7802 9 Fax 501.221-7880 509'Nest Spring Street, Suite 135 % Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Telephone 479-444-7880 * Fax 470-251-8210 J\Genera I Office\Transmittal.doc cup.doc 03/01/10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON AN APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To all owners of lands lying within 200 feet of the boundary of property at: Address: 102 South Rodney Parham Road, Little Rock, AR 72205 General Location: South Side of Rodney Parham Road, ±300 Feet South Of West Markham Street Owned By: King Chow & Jasmine Lin, husband & wife Notice is hereby given that an application for a Conditional Use Permit on the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham, City of Little Rock, Arkansas to allow use of the property as follows: Present Use: Vacant Property Proposed Use: Conditioned Storage Facility A public hearing on the application will be held in the Chamber of the Little Rock Board of Directors, 2nd Floor, City Hall on: August 25, 2016 AT 4:00 PM. Meetings between the developer, the staff and the neighborhood residents can be arranged prior to the public hearing if desired. The developer is Platinum Construction and can be contacted through their Agent, Development Consultants, Inc., at telephone number 501-221-7880. All interested parties may appear and be heard at said time and place, or may notify the reviewing body of their views by letter. Information about the application may be requested by contacting Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas; (501) 371-4790. AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that I have notified all the property owners of record within 200 feet of the above described property that a Conditional Use Permit application is being considered and the public hearing will be held at the time and place described. AGENT: ❑ ent Consultants, Inc. BY: Robert rown DATE: Gd fit" Beach Abstract & Guaranty Company, Inc. 100 Center Street - P.O. Box 2580 Little Rock, AR 72203 (501) 376-5652 Telephone (501) 376-5667 Facsimile Email: ddavis(&,beacbabst.com August 2, 2016 Development Consultants Inc Attn: Robert Brown 2200 N. Rodney Parham Road - Suite 220 Little Rock AR 72212 Beach No. S16-7018 — Update Chow King & Jasmine Lin 102 S Rodney Parham Road - Little Rock AR RE: Part of the forth I of the SW 4 NE t of S&;:Wn 2, T3wrxh�p i Hnrtth, gorge 13 Wait, In tht City of Uttl,a Rook. Pulcaki County. Arkansoe, more particularly deecrlbed as foliews: Beglrnnfng at, a 5/B inch iron pipe at the Southeast comer of tat i, �ke�,gs--Aibariaonrs SuMvfslon arc! being � feet Eart of the Southwest c oiler of the said North } S►1! j RE J. thence forth $7 dog rtva 51 mirutea 08 eaoondu East for 2MOD feet ttlanrg North 02 dejweee 57 rnlnuies 12 eecends East far 1270 fast to a 5/6 inch iron Rim thenco South 87 degrees M minutes 49 seconds East }er RA AA fm to t!r> beginning of a curve ono a 5/8 Inch Iron pips; thsrnce along ac9d curve turning to tine left through on angel of 12 dagreen 40 rrlim4as 03 dec;urxk6 !having a rudlus of Itbls.38 M0. dMd ,roars brig chard bears Nadi+ 67 degrees a2 minutes 27 sacarlds East for 42.00 font to o -,/d fnch iron plpht; thyncs NWh 09 dooraea 21 minutao 34 seconds WW far 50.00 Not W the beginning of a curve and 5/8 Inch iron pipe; thence obnQ said curve turnirq to the right through dh d65I& of 10 degrees 40 minutes 52 eecorde, ring a rodlus of 138.38 feat and who" long chord boars South 55 dtyrre* as MInutea 12 a1360rdo Wont for 20.00 feat to Ilea EenylemIcy of u uurve urns a 0/5 inch Iron pipit; Tnie"a 41la% safd curve turning to the right through an uncle of 02 degrees 01 minutes 11 seconds, having a nvfln_ar of 138.M fatir and whose long chord hears North 87 degrees 34 mklutss 07 meanda Anat 4.88 Net to an 5/a inch iron pipe, es"s North B7 degris" 114 rrdrrutess 48 seconds Wset for 95,10 first to 3 5/8 inch Iron plpa; thence North 01 dogroas 23 minutes 38 ss,00raiR Frekvt for "J7 feat to a 5/6 inch irgn pipe; thnnoe nq0 25 dogreas 02 minutaa 15 seconds East for 106.?0 feet to a 5/19 inch Iran pipe on the Southerly rloq of gray i.'ns of Rodney Porthaln Road: thence Marlh 61 degrees 26 minutes 33 seconds West along 16d Sout3o-el-ty right of way fine for 12S,�O foot to a 5/8 inch iron pipe and tha Easterly lime of ev[d Lot 1. thence Sault i 39 deWees 46 minutes 27 9eendt WaM fee 158,JV feint QIcng saW Ecatetly line to a 5/6 inch mbar: thence conkJnus along ■aid Enstarty One $outh 42 degnft 23 m-inirtas 27 saaands Wool for 324.84 feei to the point of beginning. Page 2 Dear Mr. Brown: We have examined the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas, up to July 10, 2016 at 7:00 A.M. as to the property lying within 200 feet to the above described property, to wit: We find that the owners names set out on the attached sheets lie within 200 feet of the above described property and that the names are the last apparent owners of record of said property. I have checked the records of the Pulaski County Circuit Clerks Office and find no record of a Plat or Bill of Assurance filed and recorded for Satterfield Subdivision in Little Rock, Pulaski County Arkansas We do not certify as to the validity of title and our liability is limited to the amount paid for this service. If we can be of further service to you, please call us. IIScerely, UW1- Donna Davis Special Service Department 501-376-5652 Enclosure(s) Pne 3 Owners: Legal Descriptions: Randy Marr Lot 1, Bradley Home Demonstration Club Addn 1020 Oakwood Drive Instrument No. 99 27010 Wynne AR 72396 Miramar Properties LLC Lot 1, Jim Garner Addition 202 S Rodney Parham Road Instrument No. 2006-78107 Little RockAR 72205-4710 Sean & Charmaine Smith Lot 7, Brook Park Addition 301 Brookpark Drive Instrument No. 200126884 Little RockAR 72205 ARCP RL Portfolio VI LLC Lot 1, Skagg Albertson Addition 2325 E Camelback Road- Suite 1100 Instrument No. 2014-47318 Phoenix AZ 85016 SASFamily Trust Part ofLots 1 & 2, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec c% Kurt Braun Schneiter Instrument No. 2010-50959 3633 E Broadway UT 100 Long Beach CA 90803 King Chow & Jasmine Lin Part of Lot 2, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 976 Mirror Lake Lane Instrument No. 2010-12420 Cordova TN 38018 W WRealty Co. Lots 4 & 6, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 13 Wingfield Circle InstrumentNo. 81-00268 Little RockAR 72205 PBre 44 Owners: Legal Descri tions: Pendleton Properties LLC Lot 5, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec PO Box 55445 Instrument No. 2006-09499 Little RockAR 72215 Bill Lamb Lot 15 Exc S75 , Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 220 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 94-71759 Little RockAR 72205 Rose Bradley Revocable Living Trust S75' ofLot 15, Satterfield Subdivision Unrec 224 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2008-79873 Little RockAR 72205 Insurance X-Change Inc Lot 18 & W15' of 19, Satterfield Sub Unrec 212 S Rodney Parham Road Instrument No. 93-21089 Little RockAR 72205 Mostafa Loth-Gelian Lot 4, Sunnymeade Addition 7210II1inois Street Instrument No. 2004-65569 Little RockAR 72202 James Bilheimer Lot 5, Sunnymeade Addition 323 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2005-38173 Little RockAR 72202 Robert Shaver Lot 6, Sunnymeade Addition Joseph Shaver Instrument No. 2005-101788 12824 Cherry Laurel Drive Little RockAR 72211 P- age 5 Owners: Legal Descriptions: Michael Smith Lot 7, Sunnymeade Addition 312 Sunnymeade Drive Instrument No. 2011-28998 Little RockAR 72205 K & HProperdes LLC Lot 8, Sunnymeade Addition 4804 Bella Rosa Drive Instrument No. 2002-116470 Little Rock AR 72223 Lillian Kendrick Lot 9, Sunnymeade Addition Lisa Fay Kendrick Instrument No. 94 20107 312 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Roberto Aqui Lot 10, Sunnymeade Addition Raymund Aqui Instrument No. 2009-66617 320 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Tracy Crain Lot 11, Sunnymeade Addition 324 Carpenter Drive Instrument No 2004-14049 Little RockAR 72205 Dolores Mapili Lot 12, Sunnymeade Addition Ernesto Mapili Instrument No. 2001-53876 400 Carpenter Drive Little RockAR 72205 Alonzo & Sharon Burba Lot 31, Sunnymeade Addition & part of Lot 17 223 Avignon Cir Satterfield Subdivision Unrec Little RockAR 72223 Instrument No. 2008-64134 Et Citv of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 August 26, 2016 Mary Julia Hill 6907 Carrilon Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 25, 2016 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision -making process. Agenda item Z-8629-B, Platinum Self Storage Mini -Warehouse was approved, with conditions. The Planning Commission's action may be appealed to the Board of Directors. The appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter stating the desire to appeal addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors, c/o City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. The appellant bears the cost of notification for the Board hearing. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TONY B ZYNSK 6,4 Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission TB:aa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 August 26, 2016 Roberto Aqui 320 Carpenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 25, 2016 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision -making process. Agenda item Z-8629-B, Platinum Self Storage Mini -Warehouse was approved, with conditions. The Planning Commission's action may be appealed to the Board of Directors. The appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter stating the desire to appeal addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors, c/o City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. The appellant bears the cost of notification for the Board hearing. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, f0 YB Z Secretary to nlock Planning Commission ta City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 August 26, 2016 Tracy Crain 324 Carpenter Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 25, 2016 commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision -making process. Agenda item Z-8629-B, Platinum Self Storage Mini -Warehouse was approved, with conditions. The Planning Commission's action may be appealed to the Board of Directors. The appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the Commission's action. The appeal consists of a copy of the executed application and a letter stating the desire to appeal addressed to the Mayor and Board of Directors, c/o City Clerk, City Hall, 500 W. Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201. The appellant bears the cost of notification for the Board hearing. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variances — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, } r1 . TONY Z Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission Carney, Dana From: Kaci Mann <kacimann14@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 2:52 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Opposition to a Conditional Use permit. Hearing on August 25. Dear Members of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I am writing in opposition to the conditional use permit that has been applied for by the Hindu Temple of Central Arkansas for 19430 Lawson Road. There are several reasons that I oppose this permit being issued for this temple and 500 space parking lot to be built on this property. The first, and most important to me, is the safety of the children in the area. The proposed property sits behind the property that my family has lived on for over 20 years. All of the property directly around that area belongs to my family. My siblings and young cousins play all over this area. They go back and forth from different houses in the area visiting family. The proposed property is at the end of a dead end DRIVEWAY as well, not a road (as the realtor has said via social media). The increased traffic that would come from a temple, or any other business, would increase the risk of accidents through the driveway. The second reason is the proposed property is in the middle of residential properties. It does NOT sit next to commercial property (again, as the realtor said). The property line for the commercial property (that the realtor states this property is next to) on Lawson Road is no less that 100 or more yards from the property line of the proposed property. All of the properties between them is owned by my family, with the exception of one house on the northeast corner. The third reason is the increased traffic, potential noise and increased outdoor lighting. While I am not sure what hours this temple would operating, I did research another local hindu temple for service hours. The temple in North Little Rock is open from lam to 8pm seven days a week. So, the potential for a substantial increase in traffic flow would be the majority, if not all of the waking hours. At night, I am sure the property would be lit for security purposes. Therefore, there would more than likely be lights shining all night, making the residents lose the peace of living out side of the city. This would aslo disrupt sleep for school aged children. The fourth reason is the construction that would come with the building of the temple and parking lot. This will bring equipment and crews through our property, again disrupting any sort of tranquility. Also, there would have to be a road put in to access the temple because the driveway that is in existence is a gravel driveway. This would cause us to lose precious large shade trees that are close to our house to clear the easement for the road. There also are underground utilities that zigzag across the easement. Those would have to be moved. Would that be at the expense of the those building the road or the homeowners that the utilities belong to? I for sure do not want, nor do I think my family should be responsible for moving gas and water lines for their construction. Fifth, the proposed property is being considered for a 500 space parking lot to go with the temple. I am not sure where the realtor showed the potential buyers the property lines were located, but I do not believe there is room for a 5000sf building and a 500 space parking lot. If this permit is to be considered any further than this planning meeting, I ask you to please come out and visit the site. Come see where myself and my family have and are growing up. These children play on a daily basis in this location. Come see what having the driveway turned into a road would do to the countryside area. This really is not a property that should be granted for building any type of commercial business. Something that the buyer can consider is possibly buying the commercial property that sits on Lawson Road and the properties that my family lives on all the way back to the proposed property. These properties are also for sale. They would then have plenty of space for what they want to build and have the commercial property. From the bottom of my heart, I ask that you please DO NOT approve this conditional use permit. Kaci Mann Carney, Dana From: Lisa Fore <magick27@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:04 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: August 25th, 2016 Meeting of LR Planning Commission I would like my objection to the following known: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit; 102 S. Rodney Parham Road. Reasons: too many other storage facilities nearby, one is approximately 1/4 of a mile away (Storage World on Cunningham Lake Road) not enough space for this type of facility not enough parking for this type of facility not appropriate for this area of businesses will not be secure enough in regards to houses behind a simple concrete wall on this property will increase noise in a residential area will increase traffic in an already congested area and in a residential area owners do not maintain property Thank you, Lisa Lisa Fore hrr }: wti��.fnrostreeremaval.com �v�t��.�=oura�*on.com 1isa�ore 501-749-9072 Get your own Capital One 360 Account at htt s:llr.ca itafone3B0,com18Zb Nx DX Carney, Dana From: Catherine Johnson <catherine@kiddycatseye.com> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:51 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit Dana, • I'm a nearby neighbor of the proposed mini -storage development next to Rodney Parham Road. Can I get a copy of the proposal with city comments and staff recommendations, please? I couldn't find a link to that on the PC website. It's this: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit; 102 S. Rodney Parham Road It appears there's a lot of neighborhood objection to this. I'm personally concerned that drainage, already a significant problem in this area, is not further negatively impacted. That can exacerbate flooding all the way into Leawood and beyond. Has there been an assessment of this? Thank you so much! Catherine Johnson BANABriarwood Area Neighborhood Association www.briarwoodir.or Bi -•rood Area Neiahborh- Mary -Julia Hill, President our strength lies in our diversity. August 25, 2016 Board of Commissioners Planning and Development Department 713 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Commissioners, The Briarwood Area Neighborhood Association respectfully requests a deferral for the decision on the Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit. 1. The BANA Board was not notified by either the developers or the City and only found out through social media over the weekend. 2. The BANA Board has not had the opportunity to convene and discuss this issue. 3. Ample time has not been provided to notify all affected neigbors as many are not connected to our social media sites. Our neighborhood association needs additional time to notify neighbors, discuss their concerns and research the potential effects this zoing change will have on the Briarwood Area. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. f Z_ Mary -Julia Hill 6907 Carrilon Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 President@BriarwoodLR.org Email: board@briarwoodlr.org * Little Rock, AR Carney, Dana From: Robert Brown <rbrown@dci-Ir.com> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 8:59 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: David Jones; Shawn Valk; Tom Cole Subject: Platinum Self -Storage CUP - Neighborhood Meeting Just to let you know: We had our meeting at 2:30 PM on Saturday, here at our office. The only neighborhood person attending was Ms. Tracy Crain, the contact person you gave me for the Sunnymeade neighborhood. From the applicant side I was present, along with David Jones and Tom Cole. Ms. Crain stayed about an hour and we answered many questions. We also provided her copies of the site plan, building elevations, and other exhibits. I think the meeting went well. Robert M. Brown Development Consultants Inc. 2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite220 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 O: 501.221,7880 C: 501.804.7881 Carney, Dana From: Floriani, Vince Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:59 AM To: 'Robert Brown'; Carney, Dana Cc: Tom Cole; Shawn Valk; David Jones Subject: RE: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit Thanks, I agree no additional detention is required Vince Floriani, P.E. Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering 701 W. Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501-371-4817 From: Robert Brown [mailto:rbrown@dci-Ir.com] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:17 AM To: Carney, Dana; Floriani, Vince Cc: Tom Cole; Shawn Valk; David Jones Subject: RE: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit In response to the email below regarding a possible increase in drainage runoff and flooding. I did an estimate of the previous pervious surfaces based on our survey and what I could see around the building in a 2010 aerial image from Google, prior to the building being removed. I also did an estimate based on our proposed plan and find that there will be an approximate increase of 6,416 SF (56.1 %) in pervious surface area. I excluded the ROW dedication from both calculations. Therefore, there will be less intensity and runoff from this ±1.867 acre property, after development. Robert M. Brown O: 501.221.7880 C: 501.804.7881 -----Original Message ----- From: Carney, Dana [mailto:DCarney@litt[erock.org] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 8:40 AM To: Robert Brown Subject: FW: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit -----Original Message ----- From: Catherine Johnson [mailto:catherine@kiddycatseye.com] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:51 AM To: Carney, Dana <DCarne��7a littlerock.oEg> Subject: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit Dana, I'm a nearby neighbor of the proposed mini -storage development next to Rodney Parham Road. Can I get a copy of the proposal with city comments and staff recommendations, please? I couldn't find a link to that on the PC website. It's this: Z-8629-B — Platinum Self Storage Mini -warehouse Conditional Use Permit; 102 S. Rodney Parham Road It appears there's a lot of neighborhood objection to this. I'm personally concerned that drainage, already a significant problem in this area, is not further negatively impacted. That can exacerbate flooding all the way into Leawood and beyond. Has there been an assessment of this? Thank you so much! Catherine Johnson This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Rector Phillips Morse and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender at 501-664-7807 or 501-664-1775 and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. i g muv 3mitins snolnaad aasodoad N t � � 30tMO1S 30tli101eld13S WflNllvld LU (33lvmodld03NI SINtltlnSNd:) 1N3MO13AM s R 2R A R t � + o �� II II sP I zx II N / z g 1 C).w w LLw.- goLL �Ow S U 8 >p0 U W p ? aww SOU N 0 `D an } \ yY r � f Aq REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Nan MARYJULIA HILL 6907 CARRILON DRIVE Add LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 Telephone No.. ' , Z3 Date / , � REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. tgt� opposed for Name Addre: Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at2"e in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock,,, aas r I wish to speak about Item # ` on the agenda. I am opposed for Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING CONINUSSIO . -117 0 This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. A I am opposed Name for Address% 4�p- �a•1rY Telephone No. &! 4RRMz,- &66 Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMIISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name Address c'1 on the agenda. Telephone No. 'v / _ 2- y _ oQ Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMIISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item on the agenda. I am opposed for Name!f Address J Li, 1 AAA V Telephone No. Date This petition has collected 156 signatures using the online tools at iPetitions.com Printed on 2016-08-24 Page 1 of 16 Mid -Town Residents Against Rodney Parham Storage Facility Construction Project About this petition This is a petition to block a conditional use permit that would allow for the construction of a three- story, conditioned mini -warehouse facility in the C-3 zoned, 1.87 acre tract that is located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road in Little Rock, Arkansas. The property is located within the commercial district at the West Markham/Rodney Parham intersection. A Kroger store, Red Lobster and Burger King are adjacent to the west. Page 2 of 16 Signatures 1. Name: Catherine Johnson on 2016-08-18 17:43:29 Comments: 2. Name: Tamara Allen on 2016-08-18 18:09:40 Comments: This is not a warehouse area, we have enough storage facilities as is. This community would prefer a business that invites people to come to our area to eat/drink/shop, not just store their stuff. We don't want the lights, crime & ugly aesthetics of a storage facility. 3. Name: Janelle McAtee on 2016-08-18 21:07:39 Comments: I do not want a storage facility put in the space on Rodney Parham by Red Lobster. There will be drainage problems as there already is in Kroger's parking lot and probably in Red Lobster's parking lot. We do not need another storage facility in our neighborhood. 4. Name: Judy White on 2016-08-18 21:43:23 Comments: A three-story storage facility is a terrible idea! There are already two within less than 1/2 mile of this site, and another one being built on Rodney Parham! This type of development will not enhance the community or be of any service to its members other than to shut down a potential commercial site that should be developed for a more appropriate business. 5. Name: Dianne Brady on 2016-08-18 22:47:01 Comments: 6, Name: Elizabeth Garland on 2016-08-19 02:04:37 Comments: 7. Name: Yslan Hicks on 2016-08-19 02:17:22 Comments: 8. Name: William Jones on 2016-08-19 05:17:40 Comments: This is yet another planned eyesore in the Midtown neighborhood. As a homeowner in the district, I am appalled by the lack of foresight or concern regarding the appearance and the dynamics of a too -long neglected area. 9. Name: Barbara Myers Gaston on 2016-08-19 13:06:35 Comments: A huge storing complex does NOT fit in with the other businesses in that area and would create a stand -out- eyesore along Rodney Parham. It would likely lower property values. 10. Name: Gerry Gaston on 2016-08-19 13:16:39 Comments: The ideal replacement for the Green Tree Nursery would be a 'green space'. Page 3 of 16 It would be beautiful for all to enjoy ...... but of course that wouldn't generate $$ for the property's owner....... which is unfortunately seems to be the motivating factor in most everything these days........ The "opposite end of the stick" of putting in a green space WOULD BE a big concrete storage complex. 11. Name: Tammy Lensing on 2016-08-19 16:10:54 Comments: 12, Name: Kaye Holland on 2016-08-19 16:34:44 Comments: 13. Name: Nolen Buffalo on 2016-08-19 16:51:45 Comments: I own The Water Buffalo at 106 S Rodney Parham, next door to the lot in question. I am against the rezoning and I will be at the meeting. 14. Name: Tracy Crain on 2016-08-19 17:01:37 Comments: Tracy Crain 15. 16. 17 m 19. Name: Sherri Simancas Comments: Name: Toni Dixon Comments: Name: Anita Smith Comments: on 2016-08-19 17:10:45 on 2016-08-19 20:14:20 Name: Mary -Julia Hill Comments: Name: Richard Minor Comments: on 2016-08-20 16:20:56 on 2016-08-20 16:27:01 on 2016-08-20 16:28:24 20. Name: Tracey s shipp on 2016-08-20 16:33:01 Comments: 21. Name: Sonia and Robert Coleman on 2016-08-20 16:33:36 Comments: That is one of the most poor choice for our neighborhood . Should be other type of attraction , like a restaurant was there long time ago or other type of nice business I prefer to see that spot empty instead a storage place. 22. Name: Noel Hall on 2016-08-20 16:40:35 Comments: I believe a storage facility would hurt the peppery values of our Page 4 of 16 23 24 25 26. 27 neighborhood. This site would be better suited for a restaurant or shop that would bring added value to the area and its residents. Name: Diane on 2016-08-20 17:10:14 Comments: Name: Ashley N Mueller on 2016-08-20 17:14:38 Comments: no thanks Name: Turner Buie on 2016-08-20 17:14:59 Comments: We do NOT need a storage facility in that locations. The traffic congestion (i.e. moving trucks, etc.), in itself, will be a nightmare, to say the least. This type operation will de -value property in the area, thus negatively impacting property owners, especially home owners, in the area. Please VOTE NO to what would be a complete "mis-step" by city planners.. Name: Joshua Johnson on 2016-08-20 17:41:38 Comments: Name: Tom Moore on 2016-08-20 17:50:51 Comments: Area overcrowded with storage facilities with new one coming on Green Tree site. Area has better useage capabilities. 28. Name: Clair Ramsay on 2016-08-20 18:11:43 Comments: 29. Name: Karen Foster on 2016-08-20 18:27:23 Comments: 30. Name: Jennifer Perry on 2016-08-20 18:27:35 Comments: 31. Name: Jessica on 2016-08-20 18:33:30 Comments: 32. Name: Kristi Rutherford on 2016-08-20 18:40:35 Comments: 33. Name: James W Bell on 2016-08-20 18:42:40 Comments: 34. Name: Tammy Lamberson on 2016-08-20 18:45:23 Comments: Page 5 of 16 35. Name: LJ Robertson on 2016-08-20 18:53:38 Comments: I agree with the other comments that we do not need another storage building in this area, especially since there will be a new where Green was located. A restaurant or shops would be better suited for that location. 36. Name: Julianne Naylor on 2016-08-20 19:01:56 Comments: 37. Name: Jennifer McConser on 2016-08-20 19:07:52 Comments: 38. Name: Tamra Tilley on 2016-08-20 19:32:26 Comments: 39. Name: David Morris on 2016-08-20 19:37:09 Comments: 40. Name: John kincaid on 2016-08-20 19:43:06 Comments: Area doesnt need another storage facility. Could use location for something aesthetically better for the neighborhood. 41. Name: Tori Pippins on 2016-08-20 20:04:24 Comments: 42. Name: Nate Perry on 2016-08-20 20:09:42 Comments: 43. Name: Cris Mammarelli on 2016-08-20 20:11:14 Comments: We do not want to see a storage facility. We need more restaurants! 44. Name: Julie Holt on 2016-08-20 20:19:17 Comments: This corner is such a busy intersection in Little Rock -- it really should be more aesthetically pleasing. A 3-story storage facility would not serve that purpose. 45. Name: Ginger Roell on 2016-08-20 20:41:23 Comments: No No No NO NO!!!!!!!!!!! 46. Name: Lindsey Haagenson on 2016-08-20 20:44:50 Comments: 47. Name: William Lindsey on 2016-08-20 20:53:45 Page 6 of 16 Comments: I live in Hillcrest but stand with the folks in Mid -Town in opposing this development, which will negatively affect life in the Mid -Town area. Name: Harrison Hearne on 2016-08-20 21:03:58 Comments: 49. Name: Jill Fiser on 2016-08-20 21:04:42 Comments: I vote NO 50. Name: rebecca pillert on 2016-08-20 21:14:09 Comments: signing this petition to block conditional use permit to allow construction of three-story warehouse 51. Name: Sharon Turner on 2016-08-20 21:24:18 Comments: 52. Name: Zbigniew Allen Klak on 2016-08-20 21:29:16 Comments: 53, Name: Martin Cruce on 2016-08-20 21:35:26 Comments: A 3 story structure would not fit into the neighborhood 54. Name: Carolyn Geffken on 2016-08-20 21:36:36 Comments: Storage units bring people at all hours of the night for different reasons. Near by is a school, post office, nursing home, apartments, and a park. 55. Name: Martin Eisele on 2016-08-20 21:45:46 Comments: 56. Name: Carole Hamon on 2016-08-20 21:50:26 Comments: I am imposed to the construction of a storage facility at the corner of Rodney Parham and Markham. 57. Name: Margaret Srygley on 2016-08-20 21:53:21 Comments: W 59 Name: Lo Vongsaravane on 2016-08-20 21:56:04 Comments: Name: Kakki Ledyard on 2016-08-20 22:00:04 Comments: Page 7 of 16 M 61 I•IA Name: Ray L Stephens on 2016-08-20 22:00:32 Comments: Not a good use of this property - especially something that big. Name: Tammy Beck Comments: Name: Adam Bearden Comments: on 2016-08-20 22:00:43 on 2016-08-20 22:02:15 63. Name: Marilyn Greene on 2016-08-20 22:15:31 Comments: 64. Name: Helen R Hronas on 2016-08-20 22:17:44 Comments: I am against the construction of this warehouse facility because there are so many of these in our area already. 65. Name: Stephanie Stafford on 2016-08-20 22:26:51 Comments: I have been in this neighborhood for over 20 years and this would bring more people and traffic to this area, which could result in more crime. 66. Name: Jane Stafford on 2016-08-20 22:32:40 Comments: There is no need for yet another storage facility in this area. that intersection is already congested enough, and has a lot of wrecks and traffic. 67. Name: Dale Stafford on 2016-08-20 22:34:01 Comments: My wife and I have lived here in this area almost 30 years and this would be a horrible location for a storage facility. 68. Name: Shelle Stormoe on 2016-08-20 23:10:31 Comments: 69. Name: Theresa Wallent on 2016-08-20 23:15:06 Comments: 70. Name: Rose Bradley on 2016-08-20 23:46:31 Comments: I have had a garden in my backyard for over 30 years. A three-story structure will block much of the sunlight to my backyard, which will prevent me having a garden in the future. Also I live one house away from the proposed exit of the facility onto my residential street. Traffic from people moving things in and out at all hours will disrupt our quiet neighborhood. There are already at least five other storage facilities very nearby, and another one has been approved for a location on Rodney Parham just a few blocks away. This structure will be too tall, and this business should not have an exit onto a quiet residential street. This area deserves a better use for this property. Page 8 of 16 71. Name: Kathy O'Connor on 2016-08-21 00:01:06 Comments: I grew up in this neighborhood, and my mother still lives here, so we are here every day. There are already so many storage facilities in midtown and west Little Rock -- I counted twelve, including the ones in west Little Rock. I don't believe it is good planning for this area to approve another one. 72. Name: Shala Ketchum on 2016-08-21 00:45:57 Comments: 73, Name: N Hawking on 2016-08-21 01:10:33 Comments: 74. Name: Sandy Deitz on 2016-08-21 01:14:51 Comments: 75. Name: Tommy Walker on 2016-08-21 01:32:45 Comments: 76. Name: Susan Douglas on 2016-08-21 01:58:50 Comments: Totally against development of storage unit in Midtown on Rodney Parham. It will commercialize to a variety of people that will hurt this section. Our Briarwood residents have fought with great effort in making this area appealing to all ages in an affordable area. Susan Douglas Briarwood 77. Name: Pam Neal on 2016-08-21 02:04:22 Comments: 78. Name: Karen Walls on 2016-08-21 02:12:12 Comments: There is a storage facility going in just up Rodney Parham in the former nursery next to Starbucks - it seems excessive to have two so close. Also three stories is an awful height next to single story commercial buildings and backing on residential - it will look ugly 79. Name: Nancy Mallett Hyde on 2016-08-21 02:19:56 Comments: 80. Name: Teresa Baker on 2016-08-21 03:21:42 Comments: 81. Name: David Sullivan on 2016-08-21 12:45:02 Comments: This is not a good fit for the neighborhood and will not look good at the Page 9 of 16 intersection. Much better suited for a restaurant or retail or even office space. 82. Name: Dianna Noe on 2016-08-21 12:52:30 Comments: Crime is ridiculous in this area already and that corner is so busy. We need something pleasant in that area as we are already at the end of our ropes. City planning is to avoid disasters like this. 83. Name: Dessie Mahan on 2016-08-21 13:13:59 Comments: 84, Name: Elaine Lienhart on 2016-08-21 13:27:20 Comments: 85. Name: Jenny Frederickson on 2016-08-21 14:06:17 Comments: 86. Name: Jenn McDannold on 2016-08-21 14:08:13 Comments: 87, Name: Beverly Huseman on 2016-08-21 14:41:17 Comments: Really ... isn't there another option? We can use that space for everyone to use. Build 55 plus condos.We need more!! 88. Name: Dorothy Woodard Nayles on 2016-08-21 15:28:38 Comments: The area needs more consumer oriented activity that can enhance and help stabilize residential supports. :• Of Name: John McGraw on 2016-08-21 17:04:25 Comments: Please deny the permits for this development. It does not reflect or benefit the neighborhood. Name: Kirby on 2016-08-21 17:12:21 Comments: There are already plenty of storage unit available in that area. Please reconsider this venture. 91. Name: Sarah Murphy on 2016-08-21 17:45:36 Comments: 92. Name: valerie on 2016-08-21 17:57:56 Comments: I oppose this development. 93. Name: Bruce Hulsey on 2016-08-21 18:32:54 Comments: There are plenty of storage solutions in central Arkansas already Page 10 of 16 94. Name: Charlotte Hickerson on 2016-08-21 20:26:15 Comments: 95. Name: Scarlett Burroughs on 2016-08-21 20:40:42 Comments: What an eyesore that will be. 96. Name: Laura Peach on 2016-08-21 20:53:28 Comments: I am opposed to the 3 story storage facility proposed on Markham & Rodney Parham. 97. Name: Ron Blome on 2016-08-21 21:38:31 Comments: I think this would be inappropriate as it borders a major residential part of the city. 98. Name: Andrew Dorsey on 2016-08-21 21:41:17 Comments: 99. Name: Claudia Bearden on 2016-08-21 22:31:22 Comments: 100, Name: Harold Louis Payne on 2016-08-21 22:34:50 Comments: Trucks should have access ONLY from an entrance on Rodney Parham. The proposed entrance will run parallel to the first residence on Sunnymeade. The signage needed for the storage facility entrance will detract from this first residence and all other residences in this neighborhood. The traffic will pose a threat to children and other pedestrians walking in and out of this neighborhood. All foot traffic is limited to the street since there is no city sidewalk down Sunnymeade. 101, Name: Bennie Sue Payne on 2016-08-21 22:39:19 Comments: Added traffic with heavy trucks would pose a threat to pedestrians walking on Sunnymeade. Many of the residents walk to Kroger each day out of necessity. They must use the street for foot traffic since the city has not provided sidewalks. I am opposed to allowing any access to the storage facility from the alley drive on Sunnymeade. 102. Name: Julie Owens on 2016-08-21 23:28:24 Comments: 103. Name: Dane Buxbaum on 2016-08-22 00:41:07 Comments: We don't need more "exploitive" construction that offers zero cultural, educational or aesthetic payback to the community. I say no to this neighborhood defacing project. DB 104. Name: Sandra Reeves on 2016-08-22 00:56:46 Page 11 of 16 105 Comments: Not a good idea; this is thriving business and residential area. NOT STORAGE! Storage only invites more crime. Name: Allan Studenski on 2016-08-22 02:04:40 Comments: I support this petition. This is not a good place for a storage facility. It would be an eyesore and potentially cause traffic problems on Rodney Parhem.. 106. Name: Patricia on 2016-08-22 02:08:11 Comments: 107. Name: Jeff bailey on 2016-08-22 03:22:54 Comments: 108. Name: Leslie on 2016-08-22 03:55:13 Comments: 109. Name: Rob Traweek on 2016-08-22 04:01:47 Comments: There is no need for this facility. 110. Name: M Ipsen on 2016-08-22 05:52:42 Comments: 111. Name: Robbye Flyn on 2016-08-22 11:40:00 Comments: 112. Name: Millie Sullivan on 2016-08-22 11:50:13 Comments: This is not a good fit for the neighborhood and will not look good at the intersection. Much better suited for a restaurant or retail or even office space. 113. Name: Molly Powers on 2016-08-22 12:11:03 Comments: 114. Name: lori edelstein on 2016-08-22 13:12:38 Comments: Name: Christopher L Jones on 2016-08-22 15:17:23 Comments: 116. Name: Laurie Boyd on 2016-08-22 15:55:31 Comments: 117. Name: Michelle Deininger on 2016-08-22 16:15:59 Page 12 of 16 Comments: 118, Name: Ginger Roell on 2016-08-22 16:19:21 Comments: I oppose the approval of construction of a mini warehouse facility in the C-3 zoned, 1.87 acre tract located at 102 S Rodney Parham intersection. 119. Name: Chanda Chadwick on 2016-08-22 16:33:56 Comments: There is no need for more storage facilities. 120. Name: Shelley atkins on 2016-08-22 17:03:43 Comments: 121. Name: Susan Allen on 2016-08-22 17:13:36 Comments: I oppose the construction of any kind of mini -warehouse facility in the C-3 zoned, 1.87 acre tract that is located at 102 S. Rodney Parham Road in Little Rock, Arkansas. There are already several such facilities in this area, and there is NO NEED for another one. Such a facility would be of no benefit to the people or businesses in this community. 122. Name: Donna Massey on 2016-08-22 17:22:19 Comments: 123, Name: Blake Griffis on 2016-08-22 19:46:22 Comments: 124. Name: Dayna Gober on 2016-08-22 21:07:05 Comments: 125. Name: Katherine Wyrick on 2016-08-22 22:13:55 Comments: 126. 127 Name: Barret Flagg Comments: on 2016-08-23 01:20:53 Name: BJ MAY on 2016-08-23 01:47:54 Comments: 128. Name: Diane Haynes on 2016-08-23 02:04:27 Comments: The intersection of West Markham and Rodney Parham is not suited to this type of facility. I oppose construction of a 3-story mini warehouse on this site. 129 Name: Don Bolinger on 2016-08-23 02:48:54 Comments: Page 13 of 16 130. Name: James Kovach on 2016-08-23 03:07:19 Comments: 131, Name: Michael McCallum on 2016-08-23 03:31:05 Comments: This use will only lower surrounding property value and ditract future businesses for a commercial corridor that should be sensitive to the adjacent residential neighborhoods 132. Name: Mila Potteiger on 2016-08-23 13:45:34 Comments: 133. Name: Mayme Gillham on 2016-08-23 16:16:17 Comments: Nope. NO way. 134. Name: Mike on 2016-08-23 16:37:09 Comments: That's a terrible use of this property. Keep little rock beautiful and keep trashy, low -class ideas OUT. 135. Name: Leland Wilson on 2016-08-23 16:46:57 Comments: There is already a mini storage place within visual distance. Another is unnecessary. 136. Name: Katherine Downie on 2016-08-23 17:25:51 Comments: This would damage the neighborhood. I am against it thank you for thinking of this neighborhood and their objection to this use of the space. 137. Name: Shannon Padilla on 2016-08-23 18:01:58 Comments: 138. Name: Susan on 2016-08-23 18:25:57 Comments: 139. Name: Bobbi Jordan on 2016-08-23 18:28:26 Comments: 140. Name: Margaret Dunn on 2016-08-23 20:03:01 Comments: Another storage facility is not needed. There is a one level storage facility on the street behind Oak Forest Cleaners. NOT SURE, but it is my understanding that the residents behind Green Tree Nursery (which has closed) have OK'ed a storage facility with the planning commission to replace Green Tree. 141. Name: Byron Taylor on 2016-08-23 20:21:56 Page 14 of 16 Comments: 142. Name: Lauren Carrigan on 2016-08-23 21:23:06 Comments: 143, Name: Lisa Odena on 2016-08-23 23:24:25 Comments: We do not need additional storage in this residential area. There are multiple storage places in the immediate vacinity already. 144. Name: Guy Couch on 2016-08-23 23:35:37 Comments: Not needed. Bad fit! 145. Name: Stephanie harris on 2016-08-23 23:59:34 Comments: 146. Name: Kristin Bonaminio on 2016-08-24 02:05:03 Comments: 147. Name: John Bonaminio on 2016-08-24 02:08:09 Comments: 148. Name: Jenny Moses on 2016-08-24 02:39:24 Comments: 149. Name: Cassandra Taylor on 2016-08-24 02:52:16 Comments: I am opposed to this business construction. I am a Leawood homeowner. 150. Name: Scott Huffman on 2016-08-24 13:28:17 Comments: 151. Name: LATWANDA ROBINSON on 2016-08-24 13:35:18 Comments: 152. Name: Mary Ann Harcourt on 2016-08-24 14:18:25 Comments: It is not needed in this area. Don't want to bring more crime to this area or to the nearby shopping area 153. Name: steve walker on 2016-08-24 14:26:29 Comments: There is no reason for encouraging developers to keep building these structures to draw in more noise and traffic and the heat reflected off of these structures. They are storages that draw undesirables such as thieves and do not create positive growth. Page 15 of 16 154, Name: Rex Easter on 2016-08-24 15:06:40 Comments: 155. Name: Lawrence Eckhart on 2016-08-24 15:06:51 Comments: 156. Name: Sandra Baxter on 2016-08-24 16:32:05 Comments: Page 16 of 16 WPLED2T50 Ultra high output, high efficiency 50 Watt LED wallpacks. Patent Pending airflow technology ensures long LED and driver lifespan. 5 Year Warranty. Color: Bronze Weight: 34.8 Ibs Technical Specifications Listings UL Listing: Suitable for wet locations as a downlight. IESNA LM-79 & IESNA LM-80 Testing: RAB LED fixtures have been tested by an independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM-79 and 80, and have received the Department of Energy "Lighting Facts" label. Dark Sky Approved: The International Dark Sky Association has approved this product as a full cutoff, fully shielded luminaire. i DLC Listed: This product is on the Design Lights Consortium (DLC) Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from DLC Member Utilities. DLC Product Code: P00001790 LED Characteristics Lifespan: 100,000-hour LED lifespan based on IES LM-80 results and TM-21 calculations. LEDs: Multi -chip, high -output, long -life LEDs Color Consistency: 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent fixture -to -fixture color. Color Stability: LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Color Uniformity: RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting (SSL) Products, ANSI C78.377- 2011. Construction B L! G H T" N G Project: Type: Platinum Storage - Little Rock, AR Self -Storage Prepared By: Date: JL Building Systems, LLC 08/03/2016 Driver Info LED Info i Type: Constant Current Watts: 50W 120V: 0.46A Color Temp: 5000K 208V: 0.27A Color Accuracy: 67 CRI 240V. 0.23A L70 Lifespan: 100000 277V: 0.20A Lumens: 5,329 Input Watts: i 52W Efficacy: 103 LPW Efficiency: 96% IES Classification: The Type II distribution is ideal for wide walkways, on ramps and entrance roadways, bike paths and other long and narrow lighting applications. This type is meant for lighting larger areas and usually is located near the roadside. This type of lighting is commonly found on smaller side streets or jogging paths. IP Rating: Ingress Protection rating of IP66 for dust and water. Ambient Temperature: Suitable for use in 40°C ambient temperatures. Cold Weather Starting: The minimum starting temperature is -40'C/40°F Thermal Management: Superior patent pending thermal management design with external Air -Flow fins provides maximum operational life, even in high ambient temperature environments. Housing: Die cast aluminum housing, lens frame and mounting arm. Mounting: Heavy-duty mounting arm with "O" ring seal & stainless steel screws. Reflector: Specular vacuum -metallized polycarbonate Gaskets: High temperature silicone gaskets Finish: Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings are formulated for high -durability and long-lasting color, and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. Green Technology: Mercury and UV free, and RoHS compliant. Polyester powder coat finish formulated without the use of VOC or toxic heavy metals. Electrical Driver: Constant Current, Class 2, 1400mA, 100-277V, 50- 60Hz, 0,8A, Power Factor 99 % THD: 7.0% at 120V, 7.0% at 277V Surge Protection: 6kV surge suppression protection tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2. Other Equivalency: WPLEDT" 50W replaces 20OW metal halide California Title 24: WPLED50 with available photocell option complies with 2013 California Tide 24 building and electrical codes as a commercial outdoor pole -mounted fixture15 75 Watts. Add /PCT to include a photocell. Patents: The WPLEDT"" design is protected by patents pending in the U.S., Canada, China, Taiwan and Mexico. Need help? Tech help line: (888) RAB-1000 Email: sales@rabweb.com Website: www.rabweb.com Page 1 ol2 Copyright © 2014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice WPLED2T50 Technical Specifications (continued) Other Recovery Act (ARRA) Compliant: Warranty: This product complies with the 52.225-21 "Required RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from Use of American Iron, Steel, and Manufactured defects in materials and workmanship for a period of Goods— Buy American Act— Construction Materials five (5) years from the date of delivery to the end user, (October 2010). including coverage of light output, color stability, driver Trade Agreements Act Compliant: performance and fixture finish. This product is a COTS item manufactured in the Country of Origin: United States, and is compliant with the Trade Designed by RAB in New Jersey and assembled in the Agreements Act. USA by RAB's IBEW Local 3 workers. GSA Schedule: Buy American Act Compliant: Suitable in accordance with FAR Subpart 25.4. This product is a COTS Rem manufactured in the United States, and is compliant with the Buy American Act. Dimensions �T b 62 i" 168an t r 1bacn, 36.1 cm Ordering Matrix Optical BUG Rating: B1 UO G1 Features High output, high efficiency LED Maintains 70% of initial lumens at 100,000 hours Weatherproof high temperature silicone gaskets Superior heat sinking with die cast aluminum housing and external fins 100 up to 277 Volts 5-year warranty Family Distribution Watts Color Temp Mount Finish Voltage Photocell Dimming Sensor Bi-Level WPLED 4T 50 5000k FX 277 PC2 NO NONE NO 2T = Type II 50 = = 5000K = — = 120- = No Photocell = No 3T = Type III 5OW (Cool) Standard Bronze 277V /PC = 120V Dimming 4T = Type IV Y = 3000K FX = Flat W = /480 = Button /D10 = (Warm) Wall White 480V /PC2 = 277 Dimmable N = 4000K Button (Neutral) /PCS = 120V Swivel /PCS2 = 277V Swivel IPCT = 120- 277V Twistlock IPCS4 = 480V Swivel /PCT4 = 480V Twistlock /WS2 = Multi -Level Motion Sensor (Only available = No Bi- for 120-277V with /D10 for 50W) Level /BL = Bi- Level Need help? Tech help line: (888) RAB-1000 Email: sales@rabweb.com Website: www.rabweb.com Page 2 of 2 Copyright © 2014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice I• I _ T� � A E a � p�Y#��s 1: v7 is LvI . kN I I I f I i -.> _ s� SiA j s ..ae.•e.r. s' ° S R ANTS o Cn �PLATINUMSELFSTORAGE STORAGE '3 CUP SITE PLAN 'po I _ I I I 1 1 Z 3 0 A DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED PLATINUM SELFSTORAGE STORAGE ---- CUP S:TE PLAN m I^=. .44 me `w' 4 rn 4.ID��•H•dfurt.ti-n.�u��.a t r t- \ \ I � T moz Cm oom r;o Coz 1mI �� m�� r y z 2 Q (_ Cn J I � "L� I r 0; 1 - le LIV& 11.1/`l1D Of1D ATCfI m t1�t PLATINUM SELF -STORAGE ]]}s:a�■■ EXISTING PERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS e 4 \ A 0 IMTIm0 m�OC O moo m T y A 1 m�1 um - o � vm - _ yp�y1 FF �c�m ;m c D) (n C I _ 2 II 'm aT xx 4 F pp DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED PLATINUM SELFSTORAGE STORAGE ej ■ N PROPOSED PERVIOUS SURFACE AREAS L