Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8526 Staff AnalysisMARCH 29, 2010 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Z-8526 Owner: Julie Pruet Applicant: Bennett Pruet Address: 35 Chenal Circle Description: Lot 15, Block 2, Chenal Valley Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence provisions of Section 36- 516 to allow construction of a fence which exceeds the maximum height allowed. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 35 Chenal Circle is occupied by a two-story stucco single family residence. There is a circular driveway from Chenal Circle which serves as access. Within the rear yard area, there is a six (6) foot high wood fence along the east side property line and a seven (7) foot high masonry wall along the rear (south) property line. The wall was constructed by the two (2) lot owners to the south. An eight (8) foot high wood fence which was located along the west side property line was recently removed. The applicant is requesting to construct a new eight (8) foot high fence along this west property line, as noted on the attached site plan. Section 36-516(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence height of six (6) feet in residential zones. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the eight (8) foot high fence along the west side property line, within the rear yard area. MARCH 29, 2010 ITEM NO.: 2 (Con't. Staff is supportive of the requested fence variance. Staff views the request as appropriate. The property immediately to the west has a rear yard relationship with this property. The deck on the rear of the residence next door faces the rear yard of this property and is approximately two (2) to three (3) feet above grade overlooking the rear yard of the applicant's property. The proposed eight (8) foot high fence will add to the privacy of both properties given the difference in deck/patio elevations. Additionally, the applicant has submitted a letter of support from the property owners immediately to the west. Staff believes the requested eight (8) foot high fence will have no adverse impact on the adjacent property or the general area. As noted above, the proposed eight (8) foot high fence will only be located along the west property line, within the rear yard area, of 35 Chenal Circle. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested fence height variance, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (MARCH 29, 2010) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as noted in the "staff recommendation: above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and approved as recommended by staff. The vote was 4 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent