HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8438 Staff AnalysisAPRIL 27, 2009
ITEM NO.: D
File No.: Z-8438
Owner: Doug Hunnicut
Applicant: Pat McGetrick
Address: 5 Cadron Cove
Description: Lot 26, Phase I, Waters Edge Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-
254 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow construction of a new
residence with reduced front setback and which crosses a platted building line.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Vacant Lot
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analvsis:
The R-2 zoned property at 5 Cadron Cove is currently an undeveloped, grass -
covered single family lot. The lot is located at the east end of a cul-de-sac and
backs up to a small lake. As noted on the attached site plan, the lot has a 25
foot front platted building line, a 25 foot wide utility easement along the rear
(east) property line and 7.5 foot wide easement along the south side property
line.
The applicant is proposing to construct a new two-story single family residence
on the property, also noted on the attached site plan. The proposed residence
will comply with all minimum setbacks from property lines, with exception of a
portion of the front of the structure. The southwest corner of the garage portion
of the structure will cross the 25 foot front platted building line by approximately
APRIL 27, 2009
ITEM NO.: D (CON'T.
three (3) feet, resulting in a 22 foot front setback. The remainder of the front of
the structure will be located behind the front platted building line. There will be
a two -car wide driveway from Cadron Cove leading to the garage area. The
proposed residence is located on the 25 foot rear setback, utility easement line.
The applicant has noted that the structure cannot extend into the easement as
there is a sewer main within the west portion of the easement, near the 25 foot
setback line.
Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front
setback of 25 feet. Section 31-12(c ) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that
building line encroachments be reviewed and approved by the Board of
Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these
ordinance standards to allow the new residence with reduced front setback and
which crosses a front platted building line.
Staff is supportive of the requested front setback and .building line variances.
Staff views the request as a very minor issue, as only approximately 15 square
feet of the proposed residence encroaches across the 25 foot front platted
building line and into the minimum front building setback. As noted previously,
there is a 25 foot utility easement located along the rear (east) property line.
The applicant has met with a representative from Little Rock Wastewater. He
was informed that there is a sewer main located just inside (west portion) the
25 foot wide utility easement, and that Wastewater would allow no
encroachment into the easement. Typically, staff would support a reduced
rear setback in this case, if it were an option. Additionally, with the curvature of
the cul-de-sac in front of the proposed structure, the structure encroaching
across the front building line will not have the appearance of being out of
alignment with future residences on the adjacent lots. Staff believes the
proposed residence crossing the front platted building line, as proposed, will
have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to
complete a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line
for the new residence. The applicant should review the filing procedure with
the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of
Assurance.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line
variances, subject to completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the
front platted building line as approved by the Board.
APRIL 27, 2009
ITEM NO.: D (CON'T.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (MARCH 30, 2009)
Pat McGetrick was present, representing the application. There were no objectors
present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval. Mr.
McGetrick noted that he was present to answer any questions.
Scott Smith asked if the house could be three (3) feet shorter, in order to comply
with all setback requirements. Mr. McGetrick noted that the property owner desired
a minimum amount of floor area. The design of the house was discussed. Mr.
Smith made additional comments relating to the size of the house.
Staff explained that if the 25 foot wide utility easement, with sewer main, were not
present the issue could possibly have been handled at staff level. Vice -Chair
Winchester noted that the house was pushed forward on the lot because of the
sewer main. Mr. McGetrick confirmed.
There was a motion to approve the application, as recommended by staff. The vote
was 2 ayes, 2 nays and 1 absent. The application was automatically deferred to the
April 27, 2009 Agenda for failing to receive three (3) votes for approval or denial.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 27, 2009)
Pat McGetrick was present, representing the application. There were no objectors
present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of approval.
Pat McGetrick addressed the Board in support of the application. Mr. McGetrick
explained that the plan as presented had been reduced as much as the future
homeowner would allow.
Scott Smith questioned the need for the variances. He noted that the house should
be redesigned to meet the required setbacks. Mr. McGetrick explained that the
proposed foot print of the house was what was desired by the owner. There was a
brief discussion regarding who owns the lot and who is developing the lot.
There was a motion to approve the application, as recommended by staff. The
motion failed by a vote of 2 ayes and 3 nays. The application was denied.