HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8339 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-8339
NAME: Rankin Short -form PD-R
LOCATION: Located on Oakwood Road just East of North Oak Street (Lot 24 Oakwood
Manor Subdivision)
DEVELOPER:
Jay Rankin
800 North Street, #45
Little Rock, AR 72201
ENGINEER:
Central Arkansas Engineering
1012 Autumn Road, Suite 2
Little Rock, AR 72211
AREA: 0.28 acres
CURRENT ZONING:
ALLOWED USES:
PROPOSED ZONING:
PROPOSED USE:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
R-2, Single-family
Single-family Residential
.NEW STREET: 0 LF
Single-family — Variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay
District to allow an increased front building line.
VARIANCESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site from R-2, Single-family to PD-R to
allow a new home to be constructed on the site. The property is located in an
area covered by the Hillcrest Design Overlay District. The applicant is proposing
the new home's front building line at 55 feet. The Hillcrest Design Overlay
District states the principal structure shall be aligned with the current setbacks of
the adjoining residential structures within ten (10) percent variation, but no
structure may be within the setback. The adjoining homes are located 25 feet
and 56.5 feet from the front property line which would typically allow a maximum
front building line of 44.825 feet when applying the ten percent allowed variation.
FILE NO.: Z-8339(Cont.)
According to the applicant the first 25 feet of the lot accounts for almost half of
the total rise of 30 feet. The lot is sloped and moving the home site back 10 feet
from the typical ordinance requirement allows for preservation of two mature
trees in the front yard and a safer, more manageable driveway grade.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is located on the south side of Oakwood Road one lot east of North Oak
Street. The lot slopes upward from the street with an elevation change of
approximately 40 feet. There are a number of trees on the site; most of the
mature trees are located beyond the typical 25-foot setback. There are
single-family homes located north, south and west of the site. There are
apartments/condominiums located to the east accessed from Oakwood Road
and northwest accessed from Cedar Hill Road.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area
property owners. All property owners located within 200 feet of the site, all
residents, who could be identified, located within 300 feet of the site and the
Hillcrest Residents Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public
Hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
No comment.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Energy: No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding meter
location.
Fire Department: Approved as submitted.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
01,
FILE NO.: Z-8339 (Cont.)
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: This request is located in the Heights Hillcrest Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant
has applied for a rezoning from R-2 Single Family to Planned Residential
Development to allow a variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay District.
The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan: Oakwood Road and North Oak Street are both shown as
Local Streets. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to
adjacent properties. Local Streets which are abutted by non-residential
zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as
"Commercial Streets". These streets have a design standard the same as a
Collector.
Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes in the immediate vicinity.
Neighborhood Action Plan: This area is covered by the Hillcrest Neighborhood
Action Plan. Their Housing Goal focuses on the creation of a Hillcrest Design
Overlay District to protect the integrity of the neighborhood. This zoning request
is to allow a variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay District, which would
allow the placement of a new proposed home at 55 feet from the property line as
opposed to the 44.825 feet as typically required by the Overlay Standards.
Landscape: No comment.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (April 17, 2008)
The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the request stating
the proposed building setback did not comply with the typical ordinance
standards of the Hillcrest Design Overlay District. Staff requested the applicant
provide the total number of stories, the total building height as measured by the
DOD and the floor area ratio for the new home.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and
agencies. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then
forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
H. ANALYSIS:
The applicant has provided staff with the additional information requested at the
April 17, 2008, Subdivision Committee meeting. The home is proposed as a
two-story home with a basement, which will be used as the garage and an
unfinished crawl space. The height of the home will comply with the DOD and is
proposed 1.5 feet less than the typical ordinance requirement. The home will
have a floor area ratio 23 percent.
9
FILE NO.: Z-8339 (Cont.
Residential development standard established by the Hillcrest Design Overlay
District states the residential regulations shall apply to any residential zoned land
within the district boundaries. Although the overlay district does not regulate the
style and character of Hillcrest housing, new construction and additions should
be respectful of the prevailing styles of the neighborhood. The compatible design
of housing contributes to the richness of the history and architectural character of
Hillcrest. Attached, unfinished spaces, such as storage areas and above -ground
basements, shall be included as part of the permitted floor area at fifty (50)
percent of the measured area. Crawlspaces or similar spaces that must
be accessed from outside the main structure are excluded from the permitted
floor area.
The lot contains approximately 13,800 square feet and was a legal lot of record
at the time of adoption of the DOD. The home is proposed with more than one
floor with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 23 percent. Based on the lot size a FAR of
37 percent is permitted.
The mass section limits the maximum lot coverage for all structures under roof to
fifty (50) percent. The lot coverage of the proposed structure is 23.4 percent.
All setbacks shall be as required for the zoning district, except the front -yard
setback for the principal structure shall be aligned with the current setbacks of
the adjoining residential structures within ten (10) percent variation, but no
structure may be within the setback. The adjoining homes are set at 25-feet and
56.5 feet. To determine the setback an average of the two setbacks is calculated
resulting in a 40.75-foot setback. By allowing the ten percent variation the front
setback for the new home should lay between 36.68 feet and 44.83 feet. The
home is proposed with a 55 foot setback resulting the a variation of the DOD.
The Rear -lot setbacks and accessory building coverage within the twenty -five-
foot setback from the rear property line shall be no more than forty (40) percent
of the area in that section. The applicant is not proposing the placement of any
structure within the rear yard setback. Resulting in a rear lot coverage of zero.
The maximum building height shall be thirty-nine (39) feet or two and one-half
(2 1/2) stories, measured from the "grade plane" to the ridge -line of the highest
roof surface. In addition, new buildings and additions shall be constructed to an
elevation that is within one story of the adjacent residential structures. The home
is proposed with two stories and a basement. The maximum height proposed for
the home is 37.5 feet as measured from the grade plane to the ridgeline of the
highest roof surface.
Property, if for any reason, that cannot be developed without violating the
standards of the DOD shall be reviewed through the planned zoning district
(PZD) section of the zoning ordinance, with the intent to devise a workable
development plan which is consistent with the purpose and intent of the overlay
l:!
FILE NO.: Z-8339 (Cont.
standards. The developer is seeing a variation from the front yard setback
requirement through a PRD rezoning as required by the ordinance. The
developer has indicated the reasoning for placing the building as proposed will
allow for a better driveway grade and to allow some of the existing mature trees
on the site to be retained. Staff is supportive of the request. To staffs
knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the request. Staff
does not feel the placement of the new home as proposed with an additional
10.17-foot setback than typically allowed will significantly impact the development
or the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the
comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda
staff report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MAY 8, 2008)
The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff
presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to
compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of
the agenda staff report.
There was no further discussion of the item. The commission voted to approve the item
for approval on the consent agenda by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
May 8, 2008
ITEM NO.: 13
FILE NO.; Z
NAME: Rankin Short -form PD-R
LOCATION: Located on Oakwood Road just East of North Oak Street (Lot 24 Oakwood
Manor Subdivision)
DEVELOPER:
Jay Rankin
800 North Street, #45
Little Rock, AR 72201
ENGINEER:
Central Arkansas Engineering
1012 Autumn Road, Suite 2
Little Rock, AR 72211
AREA: 0.28 acres
CURRENT ZONING
ALLOWED USES:
PROPOSED ZONING
PROPOSED USE:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
R-2, Single-family
Single-family Residential
PD-R
FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
Single-family — Variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay
District to allow an increased front building line.
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PR OPOSALIREQUEST:
The applicant is seeking a rezoning of the site from R-2 Single-family to PD-R to
allow a new home to be constructed on the site. The property is located in an
area covered by the Hillcrest Design Overlay District. The applicant is proposing
the new home's front building line at 55 feet. The Hillcrest Design Overlay
District states the principal structure shall be aligned with the current setbacks of
the adjoining residential structures within ten 10) percent variation,
no
structure may be within the setback. The adjoininghomesarelocated 25tfeet
and 55.5 feet from the front property line which would typically allow a maximum
front building line of 44.825 feet when applying the ten percent allowed variation.
May 8, 2008
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.
1-1
C
191
E
FILE NO.: Z-8339
According to the applicant the first 25 feet of the lot accounts for almost half of
the total rise of 30 feet. The lot is sloped and moving the home site back 10 feet
from the typical ordinance requirement allows for preservation of two mature
trees in the front yard and a safer, more manageable driveway grade.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is located on the south side of Oakwood Road one lot east of North Oak
Street. The lot slopes upward from the street with an elevation change of
approximately 40 feet. There are a number of trees on the site; most of the
mature trees are located beyond the typical 25-foot setback. There are
single-family homes located north, south and west of the site. There are
apartments/condominiums located to the east accessed from Oakwood Road
and northwest accessed from Cedar Hill Road.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area
property owners. All property owners located within 200 feet of the site, all
residents, who could be identified, located within 300 feet of the site and the
Hilicrest Residents Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public
Hearing.
ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
No comment.
UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Enerp : No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding meter
location.
Fire Department: Approved as submitted.
2
May 8, 2008
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: This request is located in the Heights Hillcrest Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant
has applied for a rezoning from R-2 Single Family to Planned Residential
Development to allow a variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay District.
The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan: Oakwood Road and North Oak Street are both shown as
Local Streets. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to
adjacent properties. Local Streets which are abutted by non-residential
zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as
"Commercial Streets". These streets have a design standard the same as a
Collector.
Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes in the immediate vicinity.
Neighborhood Action Plan: This area is covered by the Hillcrest Neighborhood
Action Plan. Their Housing Goal focuses on the creation of a Hillcrest Design
Overlay District to protect the integrity of the neighborhood. This zoning request
is to allow a variation from the Hillcrest Design Overlay District, which would
allow the placement of a new proposed home at 55 feet from the property line as
opposed to the 44.825 feet as typically required by the Overlay Standards.
Landscape: No comment.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (April 17, 2008)
The applicant was present. Staff presented an overview of the request stating
the proposed building setback did not comply with the typical ordinance
standards of the Hillcrest Design Overlay District. Staff requested the applicant
provide the total number of stories, the total building height as measured by the
DOD and the floor area ratio for the new home.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and
agencies. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then
forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
3
May 8, 2008
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.
H. ANALYSIS:
FILE NO.: Z-8339
The applicant has provided staff with the additional information requested at the
April 17, 2008, Subdivision Committee meeting. The home is proposed as a
two-story home with a basement, which will be used as the garage and an
unfinished crawl space. The height of the home will comply with the DOD and is
proposed 1.5 feet less than the typical ordinance requirement. The home will
have a floor area ratio 23 percent.
Residential development standard established by the Hillcrest Design Overlay
District states the residential regulations shall apply to any residential zoned land
within the district boundaries. Although the overlay district does not regulate the
style and character of Hillcrest housing, new construction and additions should
be respectful of the prevailing styles of the neighborhood. The compatible design
of housing contributes to the richness of the history and architectural character of
Hillcrest. Attached, unfinished spaces, such as storage areas and above -ground
basements, shall be included as part of the permitted floor area at fifty (50)
percent of the measured area. Crawlspaces or similar spaces that must
be accessed from outside the main structure are excluded from the permitted
floor area.
The lot contains approximately 13,800 square feet and was a legal lot of record
at the time of adoption of the DOD. The home is proposed with more than one
floor with a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 23 percent. Based on the lot size a FAR of
37 percent is permitted.
The mass section limits the maximum lot coverage for all structures under roof to
fifty (50) percent. The lot coverage of the proposed structure is 23.4 percent.
All setbacks shall be as required for the zoning district, except the front -yard
setback for the principal structure shall be aligned with the current setbacks of
the adjoining residential structures within ten (10) percent variation, but no
structure may be within the setback. The adjoining homes are set at 25-feet and
56.5 feet. To determine the setback an average of the two setbacks is calculated
resulting in a 40.75-foot setback. By allowing the ten percent variation the front
setback for the new home should lay between 36.68 feet and 44.83 feet. The
home is proposed with a 55 foot setback resulting the a variation of the DOD.
The Rear -lot setbacks and accessory building coverage within the twenty -five-
foot setback from the rear property line shall be no more than forty (40) percent
of the area in that section. The applicant is not proposing the placement of any
structure within the rear yard setback. Resulting in a rear lot coverage of zero.
The maximum building height shall be thirty-nine (39) feet or two and one-half
(2 1/2) stories, measured from the "grade plane" to the ridge -line of the highest
CI
May 8, 2008
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 13 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-8339
roof surface. In addition, new buildings and additions shall be constructed to an
elevation that is within one story of the adjacent residential structures. The home
is proposed with two stories and a basement. The maximum height proposed for
the home is 37.5 feet as measured from the grade plane to the ridgeline of the
highest roof surface.
Property, if for any reason, that cannot be developed without violating the
standards of the DOD shall be reviewed through the planned zoning district
(PZD) section of the zoning ordinance, with the intent to devise a workable
development plan which is consistent with the purpose and intent of the overlay
standards. The developer is seeing a variation from the front yard setback
requirement through a PRD rezoning as required by the ordinance. The
developer has indicated the reasoning for placing the building as proposed will
allow for a better driveway grade and to allow some of the existing mature trees
on the site to be retained. Staff is supportive of the request. To staffs knowledge
there are no outstanding issues associated with the request. Staff does not feel
the placement of the new home as proposed with an additional 10.17-foot
setback than typically allowed will significantly impact the development or the
area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the
comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda
staff report.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(MAY 8, 2008)
The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff
presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to
compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of
the agenda staff report.
There was no further discussion of the item. The commission voted to approve the item
for approval on the consent agenda by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
R