HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8252 Staff AnalysisAUGUST 27, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.: Z-8252
Owner: Seth and Kelly Ward
Applicant: Seth and Kelly Ward
Address: 4215 Lee Avenue
Description: Lot 11, Block 1, Pinehurst Addition
Zoned: R-3
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-
156 to allow an accessory building with a reduced side setback.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-3 zoned property at 4215 Lee Avenue is occupied by a two-story brick
and frame single family residence. There is a one -car wide driveway at the
northwest corner of the property which runs along the west side of the house.
A one-story frame detached garage which previously existed in the rear yard
area was recently removed.
The applicants propose to pour a new concrete slab on top of the old slab and
construct a new one-story garage structure at the same location as the garage
which was removed from the property. The new garage is proposed to
maintain the same one (1) foot side (west) setback as the previous structure,
with a one (1) foot overhang to the side property line. The garage will be
located 12.5 feet from the rear (south) property line, 32.4 feet from the east
side property line and separated from the house by over six (6) feet.
AUGUST 27, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.
Additionally, the structure will occupy approximately 17 percent of the required
rear yard (rear 25 feet of the lot).
Section 36-156(a)(2)f. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side
setback of three (3) feet for accessory buildings in R-3 zoning. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting a variance to allow the one (1) foot side (west) setback
as previously existed on the site.
Staff does not support the requested variance. Staff's non-support is based
primarily on the fact that a new concrete slab will be poured for the new garage
structure. Staff believes there is ample space to provide the minimum required
three (3) foot side setback, with the new foundation. However, the farther to
the east the structure is moved, the more difficult it will be to pull a vehicle into
the structure. Therefore, staff could support an 18 inch side yard setback, as
has been approved for similar situations in the past. This will allow for the
structure to be constructed and maintained without encroaching onto the
property to the west. Staff support will also be conditioned on the overhang
not exceeding 12 inches and guttering being provided to prohibit water run-off
onto the adjacent property to the west. With these conditions, staff believes
the new accessory structure will have no adverse impact on the adjacent
properties or the general area.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested setback variance, as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(AUGUST 27, 2007)
Seth Ward was present, representing the application. There were no objectors
present. Staff presented the application with a recommendation of denial, as filed.
Seth Ward addressed the Board in support of the application. He explained why the
one (1) foot side setback was needed for the garage structure. He also provided
photos to the Board of the area where the proposed garage was to be constructed.
He explained that the garage structure filled a gap in the wall/fence line between his
property and the property to the west.
James Van Dover asked if the new slab will coincide with the old slab. Mr. Ward
explained that the footings would be closer to the side property line. Mr. Van Dover
asked when the deck was constructed on the rear of the house. Mr. Ward noted that
it had been in place for two (2) weeks. These issues were briefly discussed.
Vice -Chair Burruss asked how large the garage door was to be. Mr. Ward explained
that it would be a one (1) car width and that it would be off -set. Mr. Burruss
explained that he could support an 18-inch side setback. Chairman Francis
concurred with Mr. Burruss.
AUGUST 27, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.
Mr. Ward amended his application to have an 18-inch side setback. The issues of
guttering and overhang were discussed.
There was a motion to approve the amended application, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Guttering must be provided to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent
property to the west.
2. The garage structure will have a maximum overhang of 12 inches (not
including the guttering).
The motion passed by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. The amended
application was approved.