HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8239 Staff AnalysisJ U LY 30, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4
File No.: Z-8239
Owner: Elorac, LLC
Applicant: Carole Meyer
Address: #7 Longfellow Circle
Description: Lot 7, Longfellow Circle Addition
Zoned: R-2
Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-
254 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow a new residence with a
reduced rear setback and which crosses a front platted building line. A variance is also
requested from the fence provisions of Section 36-516 to allow a wall which exceeds
the maximum height allowed.
Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential
Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments
B. Staff Analysis:
The R-2 zoned property at 47 Longfellow circle is currently vacant. A single
family residence which previously existed on the site has been removed. The
property slopes downward from side to side (south to north). The single family
lot backs up to the Country Club of Little Rock golf course and contains a 20
foot platted front building line.
The applicant proposes to construct a new single family home on the property,
as noted on the attached site plan. The residence will be two stories in height
at its north end and one story at the south end. There will be a two -car wide
driveway at the southwest corner of the property leading to a garage at the
JULY 30, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T,
south end of the residence. The residence will be located behind the 20 foot
front platted building line with the exception of the step/landing structure, which
will extend to the front property line. The westernmost landing will be
approximately two (2) feet above grade, with the landing nearest to the front
porch being approximately four (4) feet above grade. Steps will connect the
landings and front porch and lead from the lowest landing to the finish grade of
the front yard.
The proposed residence will be located 10'-10" to 52 feet from the rear (east)
property line. There will also be a retaining wall located on the rear property
line, also noted on the attached site plan. The wall will extend from the rear of
the house, with the north end of the wall being approximately nine (9) feet
above grade and the south end dropping to grade. There will also be a hand
rail on top of the proposed wall.
Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum
setback of 25 feet from the 'rear property line. Section 36-516(e)(1)a. allows a
maximum fence/wall height of six (6) feet. Section 31-12 of the Subdivision
Ordinance requires that encroachments across platted building lines be
reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant
is requesting variances form these ordinance standards to allow a reduced
rear setback for the proposed residence, the rear retaining wall with an
increased height (as viewed from the east), and the residence's step/landing
structure to cross the front platted building line.
Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff's support is based
primarily on the fact that the lot has an unusual shape with a fairly shallow
depth at its north end (85 feet), combined with the lot's topography. The
southwest corner of the lot is approximately 22 feet higher than the northeast
corner. The applicant has chosen to work with the grade of the land instead
of constructing a rather high retaining wall(s) within the north portion of the lot.
Because of this, the step/landing structure on front of the house is needed for
access to the residence, as the front porch will be approximately eight (8) feet
above grade. Additionally, the retaining wall along the rear property line is
required in order to have a small level rear yard area. Staff believes the
proposed residence with reduced setbacks will have no adverse impact on the
adjacent properties or the neighborhood. The applicant should review the Bill
of assurance for the neighborhood to assure that the proposed residence
complies with the height and area standards.
If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to
complete a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line
for the step/landing structure. The applicant should review the filing procedure
with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of
Assurance.
J U LY 30, 2007
ITEM NO.: 4 (CON'T.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback, building line and
fence/wall variances, associated with the new residential structure, subject to
the following conditions:
1. Completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted
building line as approved by the Board.
2. The step/landing structure must remain uncovered and unenclosed on the
north, south and west sides.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(JULY 30, 2007)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the
item and a recommendation of approval.
The applicant offered no additional comments.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by
staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent.