Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8233 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-8233 NAME: Katillus Cove Short -form PD-R LOCATION: Located on the Southwest corner of Cantrell and Katillus Roads DEVELOPER: Katillus Court LLC 13503 Kanis Road Little Rock, AR 72211 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 4.9 acres CURRENT ZONING: ALLOWED USES PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED USE NUMBER OF LOTS: 25 R-2, Single-family Single-family residential .1 . FT. NEW STREET: 730 LF Single-family residential — 25 Lots VARIANCESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: 1. An in -lieu payment for the storm water detention ordinance requirement. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The project is located near the southwest corner of Cantrell Road and South Katillus Road. The property contains approximately 4.9 acres and is being proposed for subdivision into 25 single-family lots. The site plan indicates the placement of a 20-foot front building line for the lots abutting Long -leaf Cove and a five (5) foot side yard setback. The front building line proposed along Katillus Road is 25-feet. All lots are proposed with a 25-foot rear yard setback. FILE NO.: Z-8233 (Cont. The lots are proposed with an average size of 50-feet by 115-feet or 5,750 square feet. The development is proposed with an overall density of 5.1 units per acre. The homes are proposed to sell for $125 to $130 a square foot with an average sales price of $230,000 to $299,000. The homes are proposed single level homes. Each of the homes will have 9-foot ceilings, Jacuzzi tubs and separate shower in the master bath, solid surface counter tops, hardwood flooring in the main rooms and other amenities similar to the upscale market of the City. The development will maintain an architectural control committee to ensure house plans proposed are compatible to the homes being constructed in the subdivision. With the completion of each new home a sprinkler system, sod and landscaping will be installed to provide a finished look and feel for the subdivision. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located south of Cantrell Road on the west side of Katillus Road. To the east of the site is a newly developing subdivision, Montagne Court. To the south of the site are single-family homes located on large lots accessed from Katillus Court. There is a one acre tract located immediately north of the site containing a single-family home with the remainder of the area to the north fronting Cantrell Road and previously used as a non -conforming commercial business. The site has a number of trees located near Katillus Road and a single-family home located near the rear of the site. Johnson Creek is located to the west of the site with the remainder of the area a large parcel with a single home on the parcel accessed from Drew Drive. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified located within 300-feet of the site and the Johnson Ranch Neighborhood Association and the Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct street improvement to the proposed streets with planned development. 2. South Katillus Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. K FILE NO.: Z-8233(Cont.) 3. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to South Katillus Road with the planned development. 4. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 5. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. In lieu payment is not recommended by staff. 6. Hammerheads should be designed to be at least 80 feet in length and the same width as the right-of-way and street. A cul de sac is preferred to be installed. 7. Public Works Collection cannot pick up waste from Lots 10 and 15. Where will waste be collected from these lots? 8. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineer 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 9. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: A sewer main extension is required, with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Enter : No comment received. Center -Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT and T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: 1. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. 2. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. 3 FILE NO.: Z-8233 (Corn. 3. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Install and place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County_ Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Building Code: If the building to be constructed is between 0 and 4 feet from the property line, that portion of the structure is required to be of one -hour fire resistance construction. Openings in that wall are restricted to varying degrees however, no openings are allowed in walls closer than 3 feet from the property line. An exception is that if there is a dedicated, platted, side yard building line which effectively serves as the permanent separation distance [for adjacent properties as well], which can not be amended or moved, the development must comply with the provisions of R104.11, 2006 IRC. Planning Division: This request is located in the Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Transition for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 Single Family to Planned Residential Development to allow the creation of 25 single family lots with an average lot size of 50x115 feet. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and Katillus Cove is shown as a Local Street. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. These streets may require dedication of right-of- way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. Landscape: No comment. a FILE NO.: Z-8233 (Cont. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (June 14, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of technical issues in need of addressing prior to the Commission acting on the request. Staff stated the site plan indicated an area as Tract A and questioned the maintenance of this area. Staff questioned if any fencing was proposed both along the perimeter of the site or within the interior lots. Staff also questioned if accessory structures would be allowed and suggested the applicant include a note on the site plan to include accessory structures per the R-2, Single-family zoning district. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated a dedication of right of way along South Katillus Road would be required with the development of the site. Staff also stated a grading permit would be required prior to any tree clearing on the site. Staff stated the City's storm water detention ordinance would apply to development of the site. Staff also stated the indicated hammer -head should be designed with at least 80 feet in length and the same width as a public street. Staff stated as presently designed the garbage truck could not provide collection service to Lots 10 and 15. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the June 14, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has included the indicated Tract within one of the proposed single-family lots and indicated the area as a conservation easement. The applicant has also extended the length of the proposed hammer -head and increased the width of the proposed street. Staff recommends the length of the hammer head be increased an additional 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate distance for garbage collection. Fencing is proposed along South Katillus Road as a six foot wood fence with eight foot brick columns. According to the applicant's revised cover letter fencing will be placed along the rear and interior property lines as each of the homes are constructed. The fencing indicated is typical of fencing allowed in single-family zones per the zoning ordinance. The homes are proposed containing 1,900 to 2,400 square feet. The maximum buildable area is 3,000 square feet with a 20-foot setback adjacent to the street sides, a 5-foot side yard setback and 25-foot rear yard setback. The lots are proposed with an average width of 50-feet and an average depth of 115-feet. This allows for an average lot size of 5,750 square feet. The development is proposed with an overall density of 5.1 units per acre. AI FILE NO.: Z-8233(Cont.) One subdivision identification sign is proposed at the entrance to the subdivision. The signage is proposed consistent with subdivision identification signage typically allowed per the zoning ordinance or a maximum of six feet in height and thirty-two square feet in area. The request includes accessory structures per the R-2, Single-family zoning district. Accessory buildings are allowed if constructed with similar materials as the home. Below ground swimming pools are allowed per the R-2, Single-family zoning district regulation. Gazebos and other architectural elements are permissible if constructed within the established buildable area. The maximum building height proposed is 30-feet at the ridge line of the roof. Construction materials are proposed as brick, stone, and architectural shingles. No vinyl is allowed except on the fascia, soffit and dormers. The request includes an in -lieu contribution for the required storm water detention. Staff is supportive of this request. Staff is supportive of the request. The development is proposed to offer an additional choice of housing in the area which is developing with a multitude of lot sizes and price ranges. In staffs opinion the lot sizes are adequate to allow for outdoor livability of the residences and serve a desire of potential homeowner which may not desire to maintain a large yard. The development is proposed with 5.1 units per acre, which is consistent with densities allowed per the Single-family designation of the City's Future Land Use Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends the applicant increase the proposed hammer head 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate maneuvering room for garbage collection. Staff recommends approval of the requested in -lieu payment for the required storm water detention. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff also presented a recommendation the applicant increase the proposed hammer -head 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate maneuvering room for garbage collection and approval of the requested in -lieu payment for the required storm water detention. Mr. Graham Smith was present representing the request. He stated the development was proposed to offer a different housing choice to the area. He stated he would hear 101 FILE NO.: Z-8233 (Cont. the opposition and try to address their concerns as well as the Commissioner's concerns. Ms. Judy Carol Smith addressed the Commission on behalf of Lawrence McKellips her father. She stated her father's home was located along the northern property line of the proposed development. She stated there were a number of questions related to the proposed development, which had not been addressed. She questioned the hours of construction, the placement of fencing, the cutting of timber, if the trees would be burned or hauled away, the location of driveways and drainage. Mr. David Theis and Ms. Nancy Theis addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. They stated their homes was located along the southern property line. Ms. Theis stated their home was 500-feet from Cantrell Road and their desire was a buffer to screen the noise. She stated her first conversation with Mr. Smith indicted all the trees would be cleared. She stated presently the trees shielded the noise from Cantrell Road. She stated there were only two ways out of the neighborhood. She stated Forest Lane was a narrow one lane road which did not allow for two cars to pass. She stated the exit onto Cantrell Road was very dangerous because the traffic was turning against the convenience store located across Cantrell. Mr. Smith stated the trees would be logged and the hardwoods were typically cut for firewood. He stated the tops would be burned but they could be burned on the western portion of the property to limit the intrusion of the adjacent homes. He stated fencing would be placed along the lot lines as each of the homes were constructed. He stated no drives would be located in the rear yard area of the homes. He stated drainage would be addressed by his engineer and the City staff as detailed plans were drawn. He stated fencing would be a six-foot wooden fence. He stated trees helped to sell the homes within the development. He stated as many trees as feasible would be saved but he did not want to promise a number of trees or specific trees would be saved and then not be able to do so. He stated within the development additional trees would be planted. He stated the site plan indicated a conservation easement along the northern perimeter. He stated in this area additional trees would be planted to add additional buffering to the site. There was a general discussion of the Commission concerning the proposed development. Mr. Smith stated he was willing to amend his application to limit the construction on Lot 25 until the last lot for development. He stated he would install a six-foot wood fence along the rear of Lots 20 — 24 at the time of street construction and place the finished side to the north. He stated he would also install fencing along the southern perimeter along the Theis property at the time of street construction. He stated the workers would not begin construction before 7 am and the tops would be placed in a pile and burned on the western portion of the property near the southern property line. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for approval of the item including the amendments listed in the above paragraph. The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. 7 July 5, 2007 ITEM NO.: 16 FILE NO.: Z-8233 NAME: Katillus Cove Short -form PD-R LOCATION: Located on the Southwest corner of Cantrell and Katillus Roads DEVELOPER: Katillus Court LLC 13503 Kanis Road Little Rock, AR 72211 ENGINEER: White Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 4.9 acres CURRENT ZONING: ALLOWED USES: PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED USE: NUMBER OF LOTS: 25 R-2, Single-family Single-family residential -p - FT. NEW STREET: 730 LF Single-family residential — 25 Lots VARIANCESIWAIVERS REQUESTED: 1. An in -lieu payment for the storm water detention ordinance requirement. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The project is located near the southwest corner of Cantrell Road and South Katillus Road. The property contains approximately 4.9 acres and is being proposed for subdivision into 25 single-family lots. The site plan indicates the placement of a 20-foot front building line for the lots abutting Long -leaf Cove and a five (5) foot side yard setback. The front building line proposed along Katillus Road is 25-feet. All lots are proposed with a 25-foot rear yard setback. July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z-8233 The lots are proposed with an average size of 50-feet by 115-feet or 5,750 square feet. The development is proposed with an overall density of 5.1 units per acre. The homes are proposed to sell for $125 to $130 a square foot with an average sales price of $230,000 to $299,000. The homes are proposed single level homes. Each of the homes will have 9-foot ceilings, Jacuzzi tubs and separate shower in the master bath, solid surface counter tops, hardwood flooring in the main rooms and other amenities similar to the upscale market of the City. The development will maintain an architectural control committee to ensure house plans proposed are compatible to the homes being constructed in the subdivision. With the completion of each new home a sprinkler system, sod and landscaping will be installed to provide a finished look and feel for the subdivision. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is located south of Cantrell Road on the west side of Katillus Road. To the east of the site is a newly developing subdivision, Montagne Court. To the south of the site are single-family homes located on large lots accessed from Katillus Court. There is a one acre tract located immediately north of the site containing a single-family home with the remainder of the area to the north fronting Cantrell Road and previously used as a non -conforming commercial business. The site has a number of trees located near Katillus Road and a single-family home located near the rear of the site. Johnson Creek is located to the west of the site with the remainder of the area a large parcel with a single home on the parcel accessed from Drew Drive. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. All owners of property located within 200-feet of the site, all residents, who could be identified located within 300-feet of the site and the Johnson Ranch Neighborhood Association and the Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods were notified of the Public Hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct street improvement to the proposed streets with planned development. 2. South Katillus Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 2 July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8233 3. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to South Katillus Road with the planned development. 4. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 5. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. In lieu payment is not recommended by staff. 6. Hammerheads should be designed to be at least 80 feet in length and the same width as the right-of-way and street. A cul de sac is preferred to be installed. 7. Public Works Collection cannot pick up waste from Lots 10 and 15. Where will waste be collected from these lots? 8. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineer 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 9. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: A sewer main extension is required, with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT and T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: 1. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. 2. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. Q July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z-82 3. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire _Department: Install and place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Building Code: If the building to be constructed is between 0 and 4 feet from the property line, that portion of the structure is required to be of one -hour fire resistance construction. Openings in that wall are restricted to varying degrees however, no openings are allowed in walls closer than 3 feet from the property line. An exception is that if there is a dedicated, platted, side yard building line which effectively serves as the permanent separation distance [for adjacent properties as well], which can not be amended or moved, the development must comply with the provisions of R104.11, 2006 IRC. Planning Division: This request is located in the Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Transition for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 Single Family to Planned Residential Development to allow the creation of 25 single family lots with an average lot size of 50x115 feet. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and Katillus Cove is shown as a Local Street. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. These streets may require dedication of right-of- way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. N July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont. G I Landscape: No comment. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: FILE NO.: Z-8233 (June 14, 2007) The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development stating there were a number of technical issues in need of addressing prior to the Commission acting on the request. Staff stated the site plan indicated an area as Tract A and questioned the maintenance of this area. Staff questioned if any fencing was proposed both along the perimeter of the site or within the interior lots. Staff also questioned if accessory structures would be allowed and suggested the applicant include a note on the site plan to include accessory structures per the R-2, Single-family zoning district. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated a dedication of right of way along South Katillus Road would be required with the development of the site. Staff also stated a grading permit would be required prior to any tree clearing on the site. Staff stated the City's storm water detention ordinance would apply to development of the site. Staff also stated the indicated hammer -head should be designed with at least 80 feet in length and the same width as a public street. Staff stated as presently designed the garbage truck could not provide collection service to Lots 10 and 15. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the June 14, 2007, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has included the indicated Tract within one of the proposed single-family lots and indicated the area as a conservation easement. The applicant has also extended the length of the proposed hammer -head and increased the width of the proposed street. Staff recommends the length of the hammer head be increased an additional 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate distance for garbage collection. Fencing is proposed along South Katillus Road as a six foot wood fence with eight foot brick columns. According to the applicant's revised cover letter fencing will be placed along the rear and interior property lines as each of the homes are constructed. The fencing indicated is typical of fencing allowed in single-family zones per the zoning ordinance. The homes are proposed containing 1,900 to 2,400 square feet. The maximum buildable area is 3,000 square feet with a 20-foot setback adjacent to the street 5 July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8233 sides, a 5-foot side yard setback and 25-foot rear yard setback. The lots are proposed with an average width of 50-feet and an average depth of 115-feet. This allows for an average lot size of 5,750 square feet. The development is proposed with an overall density of 5.1 units per acre. One subdivision identification sign is proposed at the entrance to the subdivision. The signage is proposed consistent with subdivision identification signage typically allowed per the zoning ordinance or a maximum of six feet in height and thirty-two square feet in area. The request includes accessory structures per the R-2, Single-family zoning district. Accessory buildings are allowed if constructed with similar materials as the home. Below ground swimming pools are allowed per the R-2, Single-family zoning district regulation. Gazebos and other architectural elements are permissible if constructed within the established buildable area. The maximum building height proposed is 30-feet at the ridge line of the roof. Construction materials are proposed as brick, stone, and architectural shingles. No vinyl is allowed except on the fascia, soffit and dormers. The request includes an in -lieu contribution for the required storm water detention. Staff is supportive of this request. Staff is supportive of the request. The development is proposed to offer an additional choice of housing in the area which is developing with a multitude of lot sizes and price ranges. In staff's opinion the lot sizes are adequate to allow for outdoor livability of the residences and serve a desire of potential homeowner which may not desire to maintain a large yard. The development is proposed with 5.1 units per acre, which is consistent with densities allowed per the Single-family designation of the City's Future Land Use Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Staff recommends the applicant increase the proposed hammer head 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate maneuvering room for garbage collection. Staff recommends approval of the requested in -lieu payment for the required storm water detention. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 5, 2007) The applicant was present. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions as outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff 101 July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8233 report. Staff also presented a recommendation the applicant increase the proposed hammer -head 20-feet to the north and 30-feet to the south to allow adequate maneuvering room for garbage collection and approval of the requested in -lieu payment for the required storm water detention. Mr. Graham Smith was present representing the request. He stated the development was proposed to offer a different housing choice to the area. He stated he would hear the opposition and try to address their concerns as well as the Commissioner's concerns. Ms. Judy Carol Smith addressed the Commission on behalf of Lawrence McKellips her father. She stated her father's home was located along the northern property line of the proposed development. She stated there were a number of questions related to the proposed development, which had not been addressed. She questioned the hours of construction, the placement of fencing, the cutting of timber, if the trees would be burned or hauled away, the location of driveways and drainage. Mr. David Theis and Ms. Nancy Theis addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. They stated their homes was located along the southern property line. Ms. Theis stated their home was 500-feet from Cantrell Road and their desire was a buffer to screen the noise. She stated her first conversation with Mr. Smith indicted all the trees would be cleared. She stated presently the trees shielded the noise from Cantrell Road. She stated there were only two ways out of the neighborhood. She stated Forest Lane was a narrow one lane road which did not allow for two cars to pass. She stated the exit onto Cantrell Road was very dangerous because the traffic was turning against the convenience store located across Cantrell. Mr. Smith stated the trees would be logged and the hardwoods were typically cut for firewood. He stated the tops would be burned but they could be burned on the western portion of the property to limit the intrusion of the adjacent homes. He stated fencing would be placed along the lot lines as each of the homes were constructed. He stated no drives would be located in the rear yard area of the homes. He stated drainage would be addressed by his engineer and the City staff as detailed plans were drawn. He stated fencing would be a six-foot wooden fence. He stated trees helped to sell the homes within the development. He stated as many trees as feasible would be saved but he did not want to promise a number of trees or specific trees would be saved and then not be able to do so. He stated within the development additional trees would be planted. He stated the site plan indicated a conservation easement along the northern perimeter. He stated in this area additional trees would be planted to add additional buffering to the site. There was a general discussion of the Commission concerning the proposed development. Mr. Smith stated he was willing to amend his application to limit the construction on Lot 25 until the last lot for development. He stated he would install a six-foot wood fence along the rear of Lots 20 — 24 at the time of street construction and VA July 5, 2007 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 16 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-8233 place the finished side to the north. He stated he would also install fencing along the southern perimeter along the Theis property at the time of street construction. He stated the workers would not begin construction before 7 am and the tops would be placed in a pile and burned on the western portion of the property near the southern property line. There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion for approval of the item including the amendments listed in the above paragraph. The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position. 1*1 ITEM NO.: 16. NAME: Katillus Cove Short -form PD-R LOCATION: located on the Southwest corner of Cantrell and Katillus Roads Planning Staff Comments: 1. Provide notification of abutting property owners of the site, complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. The notice must be mailed no later than June 20, 2007. The Office of Planning and Development must receive the proof of notice no later than June 28, 2007. 2. What is the purpose of the Tract? This area should be included in the indicated lots to eliminate a potential "weed lot" in the future. 3. Is any fencing proposed within the development? If so provide the location of the proposed fencing including a note indicating the construction materials along with the total height. 4. Provide the proposed square footages of the homes. Provide the proposed construction materials. Provide the maximum building height of the proposed structures. 5. Will there be a subdivision identification sign located at the entrance to the proposed subdivision? Provide the location along with the total height and area. Single-family is typically allowed a maximum sign area of thirty-two square feet and a maximum sign height of six feet. 6. Are interior fences proposed with the new construction or by the future homeowners? Include a note on the site plan including the total height and construction material to allow fencing to occur. 7. Are accessory structures allowed, including outbuildings and swimming pools as a part of the Bill of Assurance. If these are desired include a note on the proposed site plan to allow accessory structures per the R-2, Single-family zoning district. 8. Include the maximum buildable area for each lot on the site plan. Variance/Waivers: None requested. Public Works Conditions: 1. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct street improvement to the proposed streets with planned development. 2. South Katillus Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a residential street. A dedication of right-of-way 25 feet from centerline will be required. 3. With site development, provide the design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to South Katillus Road with the planned development. 4. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) and (d) will be required prior Item # 16. to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of construction. 5. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. In lieu payment is not recommended by staff. 6. Hammerheads should be designed to be at least 80 feet in length and the same width as the right-of-way and street. A cul de sac is preferred to be installed. 7. Public Works Collection cannot pick up waste from Lots 10 and 15. Where will waste be collected from these lots? 8. Streetlights are required by Section 31-403 of the Little Rock code. Provide plans for approval to Traffic Engineering. Streetlights must be installed prior to platting/certificate of occupancy. Contact Traffic Engineer 379-1813 (Steve Philpott) for more information. 9. If disturbed area is one (1) or more acres, obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: A sewer main extension is required, with easements. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: Approved as submitted. AT and T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: 1. All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. 2. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will apply to all connections including any metered connections off the private fire system. 3. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Install and place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route. Planning Division: This request is located in the Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Transition for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 Single Family to Planned Residential Development to allow the creation of 25 single family lots with an average lot size of 50x115 feet. Item # 16. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and Katillus Cove is shown as a Local Street. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of the development. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan. Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plat (to include the additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, June 20, 2007. Item # 16.