HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8170-D Staff AnalysisIli �[•�ii�:�ivisas]
NAME: Pinnacle at Maumelle Long -form Conceptual PCD Revocation
LOCATION: Located at 25616 Highway 10
DEVELOPER
RET Development LLC
P.O. Box 242116
Little Rock, AR 72223
ENGINEER:
White-Daters and Associates
24 Rahling Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 37.56 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 6 FT. NEW STREET: 915 LF
WARD: N/A PLANNING DISTRICT: 29 - Barrett CENSUS TRACT: 42.01
CURRENT ZONING: PCD
ALLOWED USES: C-2 and 0-2 uses and the allowance of a convenience store
UNDERLYING ZONING. R-2, Single-family
BACKGROUND -
Ordinance No. 19,720 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on April 3, 2007,
rezoned the site from R-2, Single-family to PCD. The developer proposed to construct
a cul-de-sac northwest through the middle of the property to develop six (6) lots. Lots 1
and 6 were to be developed using C-2, Shopping Center District uses and the
allowance of a convenience store on any one (1) of the lots. Lots 2 through 5 would
develop using 0-2, Office and Institutional District uses with the allowance of
ten (10) percent of the total building square footage to be used as an accessory uses as
allowed per the 0-2, Office and Institutional Zoning District. The request also included
utilizing the existing office and parking for an office use, general and professional office,
until the property was redeveloped. The lots were indicated in excess of
three (3) acres; ranging from 3.01 to 11.49 acres.
FILE NO.: Z-8170-D Cont.)
A. PROPOSAL!REQUEST/APPLICANT'S STATEMENT:
Per Section 36-454(d) The owner of an approved PD or PUD may, for cause,
request repeal of the ordinance establishing the development when it has been
determined that the development will not occur. A written request may be filed
with the City staff at any time up to three (3) years after the date of adoption of
the ordinance creating the PUD or PD. The request shall set forth the cause of
the repeal.
According to the ordinance, the Planning Commission recommendation on the
repeal request shall be forwarded to the Board of Directors for their
consideration. The board of directors may grant or deny the request or return the
request to the planning commission for further study. If the request is approved,
an ordinance shall be adopted repealing the PUD or PD.
The owner has stated the development will not occur as planned. The owner is
requesting the PCD zoning be revoked and the R-2, Single-family Zoning District
zoning be restored.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site was formerly used as a golf driving range and there is a single building
located near the southwestern portion of the site. The area has a mixture of uses
and zoning. A number of the properties in the area are zoned AF, Agricultural
and Forestry. There are two commercially zoned properties located to the west,
a site zoned CA Neighborhood Commercial, which is vacant and a site zoned
PCD which is developed with a number of buildings which allows C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial uses, limited outdoor storage and auto sales, as
allowable uses for the site.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS. -
The Nowlin Creek Neighborhood Association was notified of the public hearing.
D. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 20, 2016)
The applicant was present. Staff presented the item stating the request was a
revocation of the previously approved PCD zoning. Staff stated the previously
approved development did not occur and the owners were requesting the PCD
zoning be revoked and the R-2, Single-family Zoning District zoning be restored.
There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the
item to the full Commission for final action.
E
FILE NO.: Z-8170-D
E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the current PCD zoning classification be revoked and the
previously held R-2, Single-family Zoning District zoning be restored.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (AUGUST 11, 2016)
The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff
presented the item with a recommendation the current PCD zoning classification be
revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family Zoning District zoning be restored.
There was no further discussion. The item was placed on the consent agenda and
approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
3