HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8165-B Application 1City of Little Rock
Department of Planning and Development Planning
723 West Markham Street Zoning and
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision
Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863
September 10, 2018
Amber L. Beale
Kutak Rock LLP
Re: zoning verification
Ms. Beale:
This letter is to certify that the following described property is zoned MF-12:
PT NW SECTION 30-2N-13 COM SW COR SECTION 30 AND THE S R/W RAHLING ROAD TH
N65*12'07"E376.54' AL THE S R/W OF ROAD TH N56*20'51"E307.83' TO THE POB TH NE'LY AL ROAD
R/W N43*11'29"E150' S51*06'36"E397.09' N37*31'02"E1204.01' S52*28'S8"E366.23'
S02*29'45"W295.82' S37*31'02"W824' MOL TO THE SLN SECTION 30 TH W707.8' N30*15'S2"W410.97'
TO THE SLN RAHLING ROAD AND THE POB
"housing, elderly" is a permitted use in the MF-12 zoning district.
If additional information is needed, please contact me at 501-371-6817 or at dcarneyOlittierock�. ov,
Sincerely:
Dana Carney, Zoning and Su ivision Manager
Carne , Dana
From: Beale, Amber L. <Amber.Beale@KutakRock.com>
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 1:57 PM
To: Carney, Dana
Subject: RE: Zoning Letter
Attachments: Current Zoning.pdf
Attached is a map I printed from the interactive zoning map. It's the highlighted parcel on the SE side of Rahling. Pebble
Beach is to the north of this property.
Amber L. Beale
Healthcare Paralegal
Kutak Rock LLP - Fayetteville
p:479.695.1942 m:479.973.4200
amber,beale@kutakrock.com
From: Carney, Dana [mailto:DCarney@littlerock.gov]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 1:52 PM
To: Beale, Amber L. <Amber.Beale@KutakRock.com>
Subject: RE: Zoning Letter
I don't show any MF-12 just NE of Rahling and Kirk. Is this the property on the west side of Rahling across from Pebble
Beach Dr.
From: Beale, Amber L.[mailto:Amber.Beale(&KutakRock.com]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 1:02 PM
To: Carney, Dana <DCarnev@littlerock.ov>
Subject: RE: Zoning Letter
Thank you for this information. The property does not have a 911 address yet; it is on Rahling Road just NE of the
intersection with Kirk Road. The owner is Estates of Chenal Valley LLC.
The legal description is as follows:
PT NW SECTION 30-2N-13 COM SW COR SECTION 30 AND THE S R/W RAHLING ROAD TH N65*12'07"E376.54' AL THE S
R/W OF ROAD TH N56*20'51"E307.83' TO THE POB TH NE'LY AL ROAD R/W N43*11'29"E150' S51*06'36"E397.09'
N37*31'02"E1204.01' S52*28'S8"E366.23' S02*29'45"W295.82' S37*31'02"W824' MOL TO THE SLN SECTION 30 TH
W707.8' N30*15'S2"W410.97' TO THE SLN RAHLING ROAD AND THE POB
Best,
Amber L. Beale
Healthcare Paralegal
Kutak Rock LLP - Fayetteville
p:479.695.1942 m:479.973.4200
amber.heale@kutakrock.com
From: Carney, Dana mailto:DCarne littlerock_ ov]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 12:37 PM
To: Beale, Amber L. <Amber.Be_aie@KutakRock.com>
Subject: RE: Zoning Letter
In answer to your first question, elderly housing is shown as a permitted use in the MF-12 zoning district, at a density
not to exceed 12 units per acre. Without seeing a proposed development plan, I cannot say whether additional approval
is needed (beyond the building permit process). Multiple building developments require site plan review by the planning
commission. Variances from the development standards in the municipal code may require approval from either the
Board of Zoning Adjustment, the Planning Commission or the Board of Directors.
I can provide you a zoning verification statement confirming the zoning of the property and stating that the use is listed
as permitted. In order for our office to provide such a statement, I will need to have the legal description for the
property and a street location. The parcel number data is a function of the County Assessor and Tax Collector, not the
City.
From: Beale, Amber L. [mailto:Amber.Beale KutakRock.com]
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 11:12 AM
To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov>
Subject: Zoning Letter
Good morning Dana,
Our client is proposing to build a 75-bed assisted living facility on a 17+ acre parcel in West Little Rock along Rahling
Road. The parcel number is 431-1020000602, and is currently zoned MF-12. I note that, pursuant to Sec. 36-257(b)(1)(a)
of the Little Rock Municipal Code, elderly housing is listed as a permitted use in the MF-12 zone. Based upon this
information, will our client need to obtain any planning or zoning approval prior to moving forward with the project?
Additionally, in order for our client to obtain a Permit of Approval from the state Health Services Permit Agency, we are
requesting a letter from Planning and Development stating that this type of use is permitted under current zoning.
I appreciate any assistance you can provide.
Best regards,
Amber L. Beale
Healthcare Paralegal
Kutak Rock LLP
234 E Millsap Rd, Suite 200, Fayetteville, AR 72703
p:479.695.1942 m:479.973.4200 f:479.973.0007
amber.beale kutakrock.com I www.kutakrock.com
This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named recipients above and may contain
information that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete this E-mail message. Thank
you.
9/7/2018 1: 5 3:49 PM WC U P 0
%,0■
R2 .
UP
1-0 3
_ a � ,
jo
.15.
PD �� PQn.
ra
M
~� n 1Inc
a J C5 Q 6 4
g
L6 -LA
7 =r • ., <0 0.0375 0.075 0.15
4 �j
Zoning Viewer Application Map
Data current as of 09/07/2018 (Zoning).
Disclaimer: Information hereon is representational
only and is not intended to meet legal standards.
Use at your own risk.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION
DECEMBER 18, 2012 AGENDA
Subject
Ordinance rezoning property
located on the east side of
Rahling Road, south of
Pebble Beach Drive from R-2
and MF-18 to R-2, MF-12, 0-
3, C-1 and OS (with
conditions). (Z-8165-B)
Submitted by:
Planning & Development
SYNOPSIS
FISCAL IMPACT
RECOMMENDATION
CITIZEN
PARTICIPATION
Action Required I Approved By
4Ordinance
Resolution
Approval
Information Report
Bruce Moore
The owners of the 69.1716 acre property located along
the east side of Rahling Road, south of Pebble Beach
Drive are requesting that the zoning be reclassified from
R-2 and MF-18 to R-2, MF-12, 0-3, C-1 and OS (with
conditions).
I None
Planning Commission recommends approval of the
Oridnance. Planning Staff recommends denial of
the Ordinance.
The Planning Commission reviewed this issue at its
November 29, 2012 meeting. There were numerous
objectors present.
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the
site, the Chenal Ridge, Hillsborough and Villages of
Wellington Neighborhood Associations, and the
Coalition of West Little Rock Neighborhoods were
notified of the public hearing.
CITIZEN
The Commission voted to recommend approval of the
PARTICIPATION
rezoning. The vote was 8 ayes, 1 nays and 2 absent.
CONTINUED
BACKGROUND
Deltic Timber Corporation and Ager Shuffield Joint
Venture, owners of the 69.1716 acre property located
along the east side of Rahling Road, south of Pebble
Beach Drive, are requesting to rezone the property from
"R-2" Single Family District and "MF-18" Multifamily
District to "OS" Open Space District, "R-2" Single
Family District, "MF-12" Multifamily District, "0-3"
General Office District and "C-1" Neighborhood
Commercial District (with conditions). The rezoning is
proposed for future development of the property. The
69.1716 acres proposed for rezoning is comprised of
11 areas within the property. Following is a list of the
11 areas within the 69.1716 total acres proposed for
rezoning, from north (at the southeast corner of Rahling
Road and Pebble Beach Drive) to south:
AREA LOCATIONS ACREAGE
Area 1— R-2 to OS ( 1.57 Acres)
Area 2 — R-2 to 0-3 (13.69 Acres)
Area 3 — R-2 to C-1 (13.21 Acres)
Area 4 — MF-18 to C-1 ( 2.12 Acres)
Area 5 — MF-18 to C-1 ( 9.96 Acres)
Area 6 — R-2 to MF-12 (11.96 Acres)
Area 7 — MF-18 to MF-12 ( 8.28 Acres)
Area 8 — MF-18 to OS ( 5.46 Acres)
Area 9 — R-2 to OS ( 0.04 Acre)
Area 10 — MF-18 to R-2 ( 1.53 Acres)
Area 11— R-2 to OS ( 1.35 Acres)
2
BACKGROUND
CONTINUED
The property owner has a total of approximately 134.9
(27.34 acres of MF-18 and 107.59 acres of R-2) acres
located along the east side of Rahling Road, south of
Pebble Beach Drive. As noted above, 69.1716 acres is
proposed to be rezoned, leaving 65.23 acres of existing
R-2 zoned property. The proposed rezoning will result
in the following zonings for the overall 134.4 acre
property:
• OS
— 8.38 Acres
• R-2
— 66.8 Acres
• MF-12
— 20.24 Acres
• 0-3
— 13.69 Acres
• C-1
— 25.29 Acres
The applicant is proposing several conditions for the
proposed rezoning, as well as an edited list of permitted
uses for the 0-3 portion. The conditions are as follows
and presented as Attachments "A" and "B" to the
ordinance.
1. Restrictions to the "0-3" area areas follows:
(i) List of specific permitted and conditional
uses is attached as Attachment "B" to the
ordinance.
(ii) Height limitation on building of no more
than three (3) stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square
foot per floor (total of 60,000 square feet for
three (3) story office building);
2. Site plan review for all commercial and office
development.
3. All developments subject to Chenal Valley
Architectural Control Committee review and
approval.
4. Chenal Valley Master Property Owners' Association
will govern use, maintenance and upkeep of all
properties.
W
BACKGROUND
CONTINUED
5. Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector
street from the Villages of Wellington to Rahling
Road, provided, however, that Plantation Drive may
be extended to serve a single family residential area
contiguous to the northern boundary of the Villages
of Wellington.
6. Construction of only so much of Beckenham Drive
is required by the boundary street ordinance
(no off -site construction in the S 1 /2 S W 1 /4,
Section 30, T2N, R13W and no connection to the
eastern most portion of Beckenham Drive.)
The property is currently undeveloped and wooded.
The property has varying degrees of topography
throughout the site.
There is undeveloped R-2 zoned property immediately
north, south and east of the property proposed for
rezoning. Single family residences are located further
north, south and east. There is undeveloped property,
zoned OS and R-2 located across Rahling Road to the
west. Multifamily developments are located further
west near the Rahling Road/Kirk Road intersection.
There are other non-residential uses also further west
along Rahling Road.
The City's Future Land Use Plan designates this
property as Residential Low Density and Residential
High Density. A proposed Land Use Plan amendment
to Park/Open Space, Office, Neighborhood
Commercial, Residential Medium Density and
Residential Low Density is a separate item on this
agenda.
Staff is not supportive of the requested rezoning. Staff
believes it is appropriate, based partially on the
existing topography, for this property to develop as
it is currently zoned (R-2 and MF-18). Several streets
within adjacent developed single family residential
neighborhoods currently "stub out" at the boundary
of this overall property. Staff believes continuation of
C!
BACKGROUND
CONTINUED
these streets into the subject property, with additional
single family residential development, would be the best
use of the property. A portion of the property (with the
south half) is currently zoned MF-18, and a future
development of this property would take access from
Rahling Road or an extension of Wellington Plantation
Drive. Additionally, there is a large amount of
undeveloped property, currently zoned for Multifamily,
Office and Commercial development, within the nearby
Chenal Parkway and Highway 10 vicinity. Staff feels
that additional Multifamily, Office and Commercial
zoning along this section of Rahling Road which is
more single family residential in nature, would be
detrimental to the existing neighborhoods, creating
additional traffic and a level of noise and light pollution
which should not be introduced into this area.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY
(WITH CONDITIONS) LOCATED IN THE CITY OF
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE
ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY
OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That the zone classification of the following property be and is
hereby changed (with conditions) as indicated:
Z-8165-B — DESCRIBED AS PART OF THE SETA NW1/4 OF
SECTION 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI
COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW 1 A, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N44°53'23"E, 694.22 FT.;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 1229.79 FT.; THENCE NORTHERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
[Page 1 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
THE ARC OF A 999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N11030'31"E, 452.21
FT.; THENCE NO1°33'37"W CONTINUING ALONG SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 317.68 FT.; THENCE NORTHERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
THE ARC OF A 2909.79 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT,
A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N04030'02"W,
298.51 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTHERLY CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE BEING THE ARC OF A 2909.79 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO
THE LEFT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF
N10010'56"W, 278.36 FT.; THENCE N31°45'33"E, 35.40 FT. TO
A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
PEBBLE BEACH DRIVE; THENCE N76°41'17"E ALONG SAID
SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 156.62 FT.; THENCE
S05°36'09"E, 321.39 FT.; THENCE S80°51'35"W, 209.22 FT. TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 1.5665 ACRES
MORE OR LESS. FROM "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
TO "OS" OPEN SPACE DISTRICT.
AND
23 PART OF THE NEIA SW1/4 AND SE1/4 NW1/4 OF SECTION
24 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY,
25 ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
26 FOLLOWS:
27
28 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
29 BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
30 ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
31 THENCE NO1029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
32 NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
[Page 2 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N44053'23"E, 694.22 FT.;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 1229.79 FT.; THENCE NORTHERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
THE ARC OF A 999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A
CHRD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N11030'31 "E, 452.21
FT.; THENCE NO1033'37"W CONTINUING ALONG SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 317.68 FT. TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY CONTINUING ALONG
SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A 2909.79
FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD BEARING
AND DISTANCE OF N04030'02"W, 298.51 FT.; THENCE
N80051'35"E, 209.22 FT.; THENCE S81°15'00"E, 465.57 FT.;
THENCE S45041'36"E, 221.35 FT.; THENCE SO1°23'54"W,
1134.35 FT.; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A
245.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N61021'24"W, 336.75 FT.;
THENCE N17056'42"W, 170.05 FT.; THENCE NORTHERLY
ALONG THE ARC OF A 305.00 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE
LEFT, A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF
N22028'52"W, 48.24 FT.; THENCE NO1°23'54"E, 594.56 FT.;
THENCE N81003'09"W, 427.35 FT. TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 13.6934 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
FROM "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT TO "0-3"
GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT.
AND
[Page 3 of 12]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
PART OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 30, T-2-N, R-13-W,
LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE
PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01 °29'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1A, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N44053'23"E, 694.22 FT.;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 757.68 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 472.11 FT.; THENCE NORTHERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
THE ARC OF A 999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N11030'31"E, 452.21
FT.; THENCE NO1°33'37"W CONTINUING ALONG SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 317.68 FT.; THENCE S81°03'09"E,
427.35 FT.; THENCE SO1°23'54"W, 594.56 FT.; THENCE
S13°51'15"W, 922.45 FT.; THENCE N00°52'17"W, 168.96 FT.;
THENCE N17011'34"W, 70.10 FT.; THENCE N73°31'33"W,
460.29 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
13.2102 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM "R-2" SINGLE
FAMILY DISTRICT TO "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
[Page 4 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
AND
PART OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 30, T-2-N, R-13-W,
LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE
PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N44°53'23"E, 694.22 FT.;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 617.71 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-
OF-WAY LINE, 139.97 FT.; THENCE S73031'33"E, 460.43 FT.;
THENCE S17011'34"E, 70.10 FT.; THENCE S00052'17"E, 168.96
FT.; THENCE N65025'21 "W, 575.00 FT. TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 2.1226 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
FROM "MF-18" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO "C-1"
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
PART OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 30, T-2-N, R-13-W,
LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE
PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
[Page 5 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE NO1029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N52°02'45"E, 455.18 FT. TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
THE ARC OF A 999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N31044'0I "E, 249.13
FT.; THENCE N24034'39"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 617.71 FT.; THENCE S65°25'21 "E,
575.00 FT.; THENCE S37°31'02"W, 988.16 FT.; THENCE
N51006'36"W, 397.09 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 9.9613 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM
64MF-18" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO 44C-1"
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
PART OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 30 AND PART OF THE
NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK,
PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
[Page 6 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 FT.;
THENCE S30015'52"E, 591.08 FT. TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE N53052'20"E, 212.88 FT.; THENCE
N44'01'02"E, 650.16 FT.; THENCE N32°35'38"E, 182.13 FT.;
THENCE N00052'17"W, 407.90 FT.; THENCE N37031'02"E,
215.85 FT.; THENCE S52028'58"E, 366.23 FT.; THENCE
S02°29'45"W, 295.82 FT.; THENCE S37031'02"W, 1119.88 FT.;
THENCE N88031'55"W, 401.39 FT.; THENCE N30015'52"W,
82.19 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
11.9565 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM "R-2" SINGLE
FAMILY DISTRICT TO "MF-12" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT.
.l0
PART OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 30 AND PART OF THE
NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK,
PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
[Page 7 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 FT. TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY
CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING
THE ARC OF A 999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A
CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N43011'29"E, 150.00
FT.; THENCE S51°06'36"E, 397.09 FT.; THENCE N37°31'02"E,
988.16 FT.; THENCE S00°52'17"E, 407.90 FT.; THENCE
S32°35'38"W, 182.13 FT.; THENCE S44'01'02"W, 650.16 FT.;
THENCE S53052'20"W, 212.88 FT.; THENCE N30°15'52"W,
591.08 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING
8.2803 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM "MF-18"
MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO "MF-12" MULTIFAMILY
DISTRICT.
PART OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 30 AND PART OF THE
NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK,
PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
[Page 8 of 121
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 160.46 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
N65012'07"E CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 216.08 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N56020'51 "E, 307.83 FT.;
THENCE S30015'52"E, 591.08 FT.; THENCE S53°52'20"W,
67.68 FT.; THENCE N88°21'17"W, 515.19 FT.; THENCE
N33°21'28"W, 328.55 FT. TOT HE POINT OF BEGINNING,
CONTAINING 5.4620 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM
"MF-18" MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO "OS" OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT.
I. 2
PART OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 30 AND PART OF THE
NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK,
PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE N01029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65012'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 376.54 FT.; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY CONTINUING
ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BEING THE ARC OF A
999.93 FT. RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, A CHORD
BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N56020'51 "E, 307.83 FT.;
[Page 9 of 121
I THENCE S30015'52"E, 591.08 FT. TO THE POINT OF
2 BEGINNING; THENCE S30°15'52"E, 48.83 FT.; THENCE
3 N88021'17"W, 79.31 FT.; THENCE N53052'20"E, 67.68 FT. TO
4 THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.0377 ACRES
5 MORE OR LESS. FROM "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
6 TO "OS" OPEN SPACE DISTRICT.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
PART OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W,
LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
THENCE NO1029'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NW1/4, SECTION 31, EXTENDED 542.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
ROAD; THENCE N65°12'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE, 160.46 FT.; THENCE S33021'28"E, 328.55 FT. TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S88°21'17"E , 515.19 FT.;
THENCE S53052'20"W, 422.50 FT.; THENCE N33°21'28"W,
315.94 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTANING
1.5304 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM "MF-18"
MULTIFAMILY DISTRICT TO "R-2" SINGLE FAMILY
DISTRICT.
AND
PART OF THE SWIA OF SECTION 30 AND PART OF THE
NW1/4 OF SECTION 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, LITTLE ROCK,
[Page 10 of 12]
I PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MORE PARICULARLY
2 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
3
4 COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16,
5 BLOCK 19, THE VILLAGES OF WELLINGTON, AN
6 ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS;
7 THENCE N01 °29'07"E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID
8 NWI/4, SECTION 31, 345.00 FT. TO THE POINT OF
9 BEGINNING; THENCE N01029'07"E CONTINUING ALONG
10 SAID WEST LINE EXTENDED, 197.66 FT. TO A POINT ON
I THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF RAHLING
12 ROAD; THENCE N65012'07"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
13 LINE, 160.46 FT.; THENCE S33°21'28"E, 328.55 FT.; THENCE
14 N88021'17"W, 331.58 FT. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
15 CONTAINING 1.3507 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FROM "R-2"
16 FAMILY DISTRICT TO "OS" OPEN SPACE DISTRICT (EAST
17 SIDE OF RAHLING ROAD, SOUTH OF PEBBLE BEACH
18 DRIVE).
19
20 SECTION 2. That the zoning of the above described property is subject to
21 the attached conditions which were proposed by the applicant for the property
22 described in Section I of this ordinance and which shall be covenants running with
23 the land to bind subsequent grantees of the property. The conditions are Attachments
24 "A" and `B" to this ordinance.
25 SECTION 3. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of
26 Ordinances of the City of Little Rock and designated district map be and is hereby
27 amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the
28 changes provided for in Sections 1 and 2 hereof.
29 SECTION 4. That the Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force 30 days
30 after the date of its passage and approval.
31 SECTION 5. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item,
32 sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be
[Page 11 of 12]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the
remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if
the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a
part of the ordinance.
SECTION 6. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the
same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed
to the extent of such inconsistency.
PASSED:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
H
H
H
H
[Page 12 of 12]
Attachment "A"
Z-8165-B
Conditions as Proposed by the Applicant
List of additional points for inclusion in the proposed ordinance rezoning certain property
on Rahling Road:
1. Restrictions to the "O-3" area are as follows:
(i) List of specific permitted and conditional uses is attached as
Attachment "B" hereto;
(ii) Height limitation on building of no more than three (3) stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square foot per floor (total of
60,000 square feet for three (3) story office building);
2. Site plan review for all commercial and office development.
3. All developments subject to Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee review
and approval.
4. Chenal Valley Master Property Owners' Association will govern use, maintenance
and upkeep of all properties.
5. Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector street from the Villages of
Wellington to Rahling Road, provided, however, that Plantation Drive may be
extended to serve a single family residential area contiguous to the northern boundary
of the Villages of Wellington.
6. Construction of only so much of Beckenham Drive is required by the boundary street
ordinance (no off -site construction in the S1/2 SW1/4, Section 30, T2N, R13W and
no connection to the eastern most portion of Beckenham Drive.)
[PAGE 1 OF 31
��.�'...�-'r;: :a indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
Attachment "B"
Sec. 36-281. 0-3 general office district.
(a) Purpose and intent. The 0-3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in now and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0.3 district is characterized by
freostanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utilities, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general office development-
(b) Use regulations.
(1) Permitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (medical, dental or optical).
^G-vffi- ity We;fa=e-er��ealtb-een6er-
Day eare Boater, aeluit�
j. Duplication shop.
1. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
in. Family care facility.
n. Firs station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
P. GI our save-ftwik4y"
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public use.
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
a, (Moved to
Conditional)
y. Rooming, lodging and boarding facilities.
z, School (business).
lt6r.- e..�..._� l�..ti.z:.. �....�(MQVed to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
[PAGE 2 OF 3]
ce. ,studio (art, muaift, speech, dramas, dance Orother artist:lu endeavors),
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Acrossorr uses. The following accessary uses are, permitted only in conjunction
with an allowable use or uses in the 0.3 district and shah not exceed ten (10)
percent of the Natal flour area on the atte.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c. Book and stationery score.
d. Camera shop.
a.e"` candy stare.
f. Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
lt_ Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k- Health studio or spa..
1. Hobby shop.
M. Jewelry stare,
a, Key shop.
o. Laundry pickup station,
p, Tailor shop,
(3) GonoWional uses. Conditional uses are as follows;
a: Ambulance Service Past.
b. Animal chnic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops.
d
e. Health studio or spa.
fi Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
l--f3il`
j. Orphanage,
k. School (commercial, trade or craft),
TAM i off e*.
m. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education,
n. School (publk or denominational).
3@A1888-vl
[PAGE 3 OF 31
�r4? O S► a"�}
love� a i a+
�`m► � Oti �
e P 0to
as � ♦A� � � 7gg�'+0h
�®�
9�
v
•` 4R b •� 4 7S Qdd
®�
® C
age
�� a. a
❑
��.9# MF6
er
�� �m� .tea ® ® 8
jp*
g !.
Gel8
%46 ra w HHa P c d
b
2 � p
?�, CU_P • � q'h
,Ag w
c H A* @�
MF12
!#4e'ar
4 isIL
Oqto
♦Y m 16 �p
I �p
a m �'° Q a am�� eN,4
B o om
t
Os
g� $4 aid 10,
Q o m
�gr �►
i ►' d Q� OQ CoC� � P�%
A
■i� vm e! *9
a 3 ► ► Fad a
V16
� O �m808 x
CO.
'
g a_M0ORbj�Fd ■Hib 4p dom e!• boaa K H
4 7 pgaw Hep�:R®Amwff�g� �mE :�
►
a so
g�°�a bP dear e
'All PRE
®® Amy AAyy�� ► M
+■
$g �� �■ gPII 4
e n
qr*
AV
i H 4V w
Os
jd♦
6 da
�H.Ib. d 0i
A 43 a9 # P
�w it
♦ bey e 4 • o a
e$ w 8 IF •'
s a
F32
w ■ice#des ■ ' i m B
yb
02
e i b
F
7b s
C1 bn
s 1 !b � � 1 a .• ®
C1
a
41 Q g
s '
a 4 y ♦
Ri C
�riR !�
MF6
�' 18
�# �Wr�a �`��� A ®$ �►� v °
M � � �
a
s � �x�oeriee° m of � �® r► 9!b ®a °®
b �v b t
a
40r 6
v o4•+•'
ft
u
s a Poe #
awy�rk � q vi#
•'d 03 o
i i • i o '� K' ��
� kAmq � y ��iwR r ► �'�� �� ` • H° 7Q d ®w a
i
o o
# p** Y �i■ I 49 �'
b�
m
Area Zoning
Case: Z-8165-B N
Location: East Side of Rahling Rd.
and South of Pebble Beach Rd.
Ward: 5
PD: 19 0 300600 1,200 Feet
CT: 42.19
TRS: T2N R13W30
iPD a � 4ad spq q � � �• �F9 ��nA� �. _ t���@��47m+�m9�c
p� pp� w a� 0 ® mem8 42 ®� �@ ��
b� $ 4n 4 a a 11® �� is q .� mw fe W 9 ®� $ �10
9 4 m
IVm�� ® ema
a� 1�a f" B Y' d� �' ® ea. °% f �+
a a� .b $ r
RH 0° �g �® W9ms ®w� �m� Cue
�p■w
a m a b e
vw
y 4 a cm m e: i goncm a 8 ��o a B®
g \ a 9a v4 �@ Mam r �8 q�■ tmw °A Gov
w� �eg�� ®ep mwo�ra1 y 0
PK/OSRL A 2a �� �v.e�a
jM w +a v e 9♦♦ p a 4aY s�ga�go� 0
w�d� Y 8 R fat ama Ba4 vv0 ♦8m 6
¢s8m�aq��6Pd� ■naai9m4
gg �mYio=49�p dplbh�ma din s' CtncA .8
p 4 tqp, vpOF �� 'lzpE S`
IMM
AY�� m4� p g g �$�C �m is w -0 8� �q
V1 =oULU
M5 mP°mm�
9i�� p�9 i e d► �+� .e
P ltl m° d lop + m a
s! n e4 �q � p v ua A
m e e
a.
1 s
♦��`k �Qe Y * # o a
� ■ �pm�rs■ � � 3 40i
a �4
NC 4 NC s f e w
C MX �a�v� 4 � �a e � i a
_ Njai
C �$ � m m �► � � � � y • �e7..wsv
jb
m � s
ap o®� � � �$ � + *R / • ���� � � paw a all
IF
I'm DTk-
ow% 'P044 to ago
8 t p* ud i ;r+°+hC®v 4 +�#4�� ■ 7 p
Land Use Plan
Case: Z-8165-B N
Location: East Side of Rahling Rd.
and South of Pebble Beach Rd.
Ward: 5
PD: 19 0 300600 1,200 Feet
CT. 42.19
TRS: T2N R13W30
AR AFAR AE # ACREAGE
I REQUEST
1,
1.57 AC
R-2 to OS
2
13.69 AC
_
R-2 to 0-3
�3
13.21 AC
R-2 to C-1
1 4
_
2.12 AC
M F-18 to C-1
5 _
6
9.96 AC
T 11.96 AC
M F-18 to C-1
R-2 to MF-12
7
E �8
^ 8.28 AC
5.46 AC
M F-18 to M F-12
MF-18 to OS
9
10
0.04 AC
1.53 AC
R-2 to OS
M F-18 to R-2
11
1.35 AC
R-2 to OS
R 900 ?S'
.-cw s�,
E•3
nR OAMxm,'
Z-8165-BOCHENAL VALLEY TRACT 201 & ADJECENT 74 ACRESOCUP
Z-8165-B
Conditions as Proposed by the Applicant
List of additional points for inclusion in the proposed ordinance rezoning certain
property on Rahling Road:
1. Restrictions to the "04' area are as follows:
(i) List of specific permitted and conditional uses is attached as Exhibit
"A' hereto;
(ii) Height limitation on building of no more than three (3) stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square foot per floor (total of
60,000 square feet for three (3) story office building);
2. Site plan review for all commercial and office development.
3. All developments subject to Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee
review and approval.
4. Chenal Valley Master Property Owners' Association will govern use,
maintenance and upkeep of all properties.
5. Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector street from the Villages of
Wellington to Rahling Road, provided, however, that Plantation Drive may be
extended to serve a single family residential area contiguous to the northern
boundary of the Villages -of Wellington.
6. Construction of only so much of Beckenham Drive is required by the
boundary street ordinance (no off -site construction in the S1/2 SW1/4, Section
30, T2N, R13W and no connection to the eastern most portion of Beckenham
Drive.)
1148727-v1
indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
EXHIBIT "A'
Sec. 36-281. 0-3 general office district.
(a) Purpose and intent. The 0-3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in new and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0-3 district is characterized by
freestanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utilities, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general office development.
(b) Use regulations.
(1) Permitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (medical, dental or optical).
A coil
e=—G04&g8 Wit: nit 0�
h, Day awsory or
,
j. Duplication shop.
1. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
m. Family care facility.
n. Fire station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public, use.
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
.(Moved to
Conditional)
y. Rooming, lodging and boarding facilities.
z. School (business).
i n;cl)=,(Moved to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
1141888-v1
cc. Studio (art, music, speech, drama, dance or other artistic endeavors).
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Accessory uses. The following accessory uses are permitted only in conjunction
with an allowable use or uses in the 0-3 district and shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total floor area on the site.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c. Book and stationery store.
d. Camera shop.
candy store.
f. Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
h. Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k. Health studio or spa.
1. Hobby shop.
m. Jewelry store.
n. Key shop.
o. Laundry pickup station.
p. Tailor shop.
(3) Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows:
a. Ambulance Service Post.
b. Animal clinic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops.
e. Health studio or spa.
f. Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
j. Orphanage.
k. School (commercial, trade or craft).
m. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education.
n. School (public or denominational).
1141888-v1
PROPOSED RAH:LING ROAD REZONING
AND LAND USE CHANGES
The following is a brief summary of differences between the proposed rezoning and
development plan proposed by Deltic Timber. Corporation which was considered by
the City Board in 2009 as compared to the new proposed rezoning and development
plan as set forth in the present rezoning application presented by Deltic Timber
Corporation,
I. Master Street Plan Issues
Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector street from the
Villages of Wellington to Rahling Road, provided, however, that
Plantation may be extended to serve the single family residential
_areas contiguous to the northern boundary of the Villages of
Wellington.
Construction of only so much of Beckenham ]Drive as is required by the
boundary street ordinance (no off -site construction in the S1/2 SW1/4,
Section 30, T2N, R1.3W and no connection to the easternmost portion
of Beckenham Drive.)
II. Rezoning Changes
• Former proposed "C-3" commercial areas are now proposed as "C-1
Neighborhood Commercial." (There is an increase and reconfiguration
in commercial areas from 19.91 acres of "C-3" in 2009 to 25.29 acres of
"C-1" in 2012.)
• The former "MF18" site of 27 acres reduced to "MF12"site of
approximately 20 acres (significant reduction in density).
+� "TN1F12" site reconfigured and moved further north away from common
boundary with Villages of Wellington. Distance is now approximately
450 feet from the lots on Wellington Parish Cove.
• Designation of a sixty (60) foot wide additional perpetually
undisturbed buffer along a portion of northern boundary with Villages
of Wellington from Wellington Parish Cove to Wellington Plantation
Drive, generally, as requested by Wellington residents.
• All residential areas will be restricted to single family residential uses
only for the longest enforceable period. (Overall "R-2" areas increase
from approximately 60 acres in 2009 to approximately 67 acres in
2012.)
1.14ISV ;
Deltic will covenant with Villages of Wellington that lot sizes,
minimum house sixes and quality of construction in adjacent "R-2"
areas will be `'reasonably comparable" to adjacent residential areas in
Villages of Wellington, Details are to be worked out in plat(s) and
bill(s) of assurance.
91 Reconfiguration of "0-3" office area and decrease from 25.47 acres in
2009 to 1.3.7 acres in 2012. (Restrictions remain as in 2009)
® Designated open space areas are somewhat larger than in the 2009
proposal. Open space in 2009 was approximately 8 acres; in 2012
approximately 8.38 acres.
III. Elements of 2009 Proposal which are also part of 2012 Proposals
* !Major eletrients of the agreement with the Chenal Ridge Property
Owner's Association ("CRPOA") on the north side of the tract remain
as in. 2009, including the following:
(i) "0-3" limitations as set forth below continue;
(ii) "R-2" areas will, if requested by CRPOA, become a part of
the CRPOA,
(iii) Deltic will contribute approximately two (2) acres to
CRPOA for development of a neighborhood park subject to
CRPOA complying with terms of agreement for
development; and
(iv) Deltic will grant aperpetual easement to CRPOA for
erection of a neighborhood entrance sign near intersection
of Pebble Beach Drive and Rahling Road subject to
compliance with City of Little Rock sign ordinance and
landscaping requirements.
0 "04' restrictions negotiated with CRPOA continue in 2012, including:
(i) list of specific permitted and conditional uses attached as
Exhibit "A" to 2009 proposal remains as in 2009 (copy of
list as submitted in 2009 is attached to this memo);
(ii) height limitation on building of no more than three (3)
stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square feet per floor
(total of 60,000 square feet for three (3) story office
building).
® Site plan review for all commercial and office development.
2
All development, subjebt to C.-h-onal. Valley Aithitect-ti-ral. Control
COMM.41'Po' roviow And approval.
Chenal Valley Master Property Owners' association will goverli use,
maintenance and upkeep of all properties.
3
11418114-VI
indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
EXHIBIT " A"
See. 36-231. 0-3 general office district.
(a) 11tapose and intent. The 0-3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in .new and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0.3 district is characterized by
freestanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utili.ti.es, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general office development.
N Use regulations.
(1) Permitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (.medical, dental or. optical).
j. Duplication shop.
1. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
m. Family care facility.
n. Fire station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public use.
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
w*~+XMoved to
Conditional)
y. Rooming, lodging and bodrding facilities.
z. School (business).
(1Vloved to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
11' IF84. V t
cc. Studio (art, music, speech, drama, dance or other artistic endeavors).
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Accessory uses. The following accessory uses are permitted only in conjunction
with an allowable use or uses in. the 0-3 district and shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total floor area on the site.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c, Book and stationery store,
d. Camera shop.
o:—Qigay bfios&-" candy store.
f. Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
h. Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k. Health studio or spa.
1. Hobby shop.
m. Jewelry store.
n. Key shop.
o, Laundry pickup station.
p. Tailor shop.
(3) Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows:
a. Ambulance Service Post.
b. Animal clinic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops.
Gemetew-
e. Health studio or spa.
f. Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
j. Orphanage.
k. School (commercial, trade or craft).
rr
WEk-
m. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education.
n. School (public or denominational).
1'_4In88-vI
indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
EXHIBIT "A"
Sec. 36-281. 0-3 general office district.
(a) Purpose and intent. The 0-3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in new and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0-3 district is characterized by
freestanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utilities, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general office development.
(b) Use regulations.
(1) Permitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (medical, dental or optical).
d Coils R"4�vRkery_
.
j. Duplication shop.
,
neveotio
1. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
m. Family care facility.
n. Fire station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public use.
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
; z � aote e—c��r—i3� o� r (Moved to
Conditional)
y. Rooming, lodging and boarding facilities.
z. School (business).
�..►._.�, r�..t ,: �� :. F: �1 (Moved to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
1141888-0
cc. Studio (art, music, speech, drama, dance or other artistic endeavors).
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Accessory uses. The following accessory uses are permitted only in conjunction
with an allowable use or uses in the 0-3 district and shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total floor area on the site.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c. Book and stationery store.
d. Camera shop.
candy store.
f. Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
h. Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k. Health studio or spa.
1. Hobby shop.
m. Jewelry store.
n. Key shop.
o. Laundry pickup station.
p. Tailor shop.
(3) Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows:
a. Ambulance Service Post.
b. Animal clinic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops.
e. Health studio or spa.
f. Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
t i a re a-_ -aa•a e�e�.. �..�.�� z.�=..�.�.._. �..��.... _
j. Orphanage.
k. School (commercial, trade or craft).
m. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education.
n. School (public or denominational).
1141888-v1
Page 1 of 1
Bozynski, Tony
From: Bill Spivey Uspivey@wlj.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:01 PM
To: Moore, Bruce; Bozynski, Tony; Carney, Dana; Moore, Monte
Cc: tdaters@whitedaters.com
Subject: FW: Rahling Road
Attachments: DOCS-#1122900-v1-Deltic -_Rahling_Road_Rezoning_and_Land_Use_Changes.DOCX
Gentlemen:
At the conclusion of our brief meeting with you last Tuesday afternoon, Mr. Carney requested that we
compile and provide to you for your consideration a comparison of the 2009 Rahling Road proposal and
the 2012 proposal we submitted for your consideration a couple of months ago. With Mr. Daters'
assistance, we've attempted in the enclosed memorandum to summarize the changes between the two
proposals and we have also included those aspects of the 2009 proposal which have been continued in
the 2012 proposal. We're happy to elaborate on any aspect of the enclosed memorandum and invite
you to contact either Tim or me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Bill Spivey
From: Jamie Hutchins
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 11:51 AM
To: Bill Spivey
Subject: Rahling Road
6/18/2012
PROPOSED RAHLING ROAD REZONING
AND LAND USE CHANGES
The following is a brief summary of differences between the proposed rezoning and
development plan considered by the City Board in 2009 and a new proposed
rezoning and development plan under consideration by Deltic Timber Corporation.
I. Master Street Plan Issues
• Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector street from the
Villages of Wellington to Rahhng Road.
■ Construction of only so much of Beckenham Drive as is required by the
boundary street ordinance (no connection with the easternmost portion
of Beckenham Drive.)
II. Rezoning Changes
■ Former "C-3" commercial areas are now proposed as "C-1
Neighborhood Commercial." (There is an increase in commercial
areas from 19.91 acres of "C-3" in 2009 to 24.57 acres of "C-1" in 2012.)
• The former "MF18" site of 27 acres reduced to "MF12" site of
approximately 20 acres (significant reduction in density).
• "MF12" site reconfigured and moved further north away from common
boundary with Villages of Wellington. Distance is now approximately
450 feet (inclusive of buffer within "MF-12" footprint.)
• Sixty (60) foot wide additional perpetually undisturbed buffer along a
portion of northern boundary with Villages of Wellington from
Wellington Parish Cove to Wellington Plantation Drive, generally, as
requested by Wellington residents.
■ All residential areas will be restricted to residential use only for the
longest enforceable period. (Overall "R-2" area increase from
approximately 60 acres in 2009 to approximately 67 acres in 2012.)
■ Deltic will covenant with Villages of Wellington that lot sizes,
minimum house sizes and quality of construction in adjacent "R-2"
areas will be "reasonably comparable" to adjacent residential areas in
Villages of Wellington. Details are to be worked out in plat(s) and
bill(s) of assurance.
1
• "0-3" office area decreased from 25.47 acres in 2009 to 13.7 acres in
2012. (Restrictions remain as in 2009)
• Open space areas are somewhat larger than in the 2009 proposal.
Open space in 2009 was approximately 8 acres; in 2012 approximately
8.42 acres.
III. Elements of 2009 Proposal which are also part of 2012 Proposals
• Major elements of the agreement with the Chenal Ridge Property
Owner's Association on the north side of the tract remain as in 2009,
including the following:
(i) "0-3" limitations as set forth below continue;
(ii) "R-2" areas will, if requested by Chenal Ridge, become a
part of the Chenal Ridge Property Owner's Association;
(iii) Deltic will contribute approximately two (2) acres to
Chenal Ridge POA for development of a neighborhood
park subject to POA complying with terms of agreement
for development; and
(iv) Deltic will grant an easement to Chenal Ridge POA for
erection of a neighborhood entrance sign rear intersection
of Pebble Beach Drive and Rahling Road subject to
compliance with City of Little Rock sign ordinance and
landscaping requirements.
• "0-3" restrictions negotiated with Chenal Ridge POA continue in 2012,
including:
(i) list of specific permitted and conditional uses attached as
Exhibit "A" to 2009 proposal remains as in 2009 (copy of
list as submitted in 2009 is attached to this memo);
(ii) height limitation on building of no more than three (3)
stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square feet (total of
60,000 square feet for three (3) story office building).
• Site plan review for all commercial and office development.
• All development subject to Chenal Valley Architectural Control
Committee review and approval.
• Chenal Valley Master Property Owners' Association will govern use,
maintenance and upkeep of all properties.
2
indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
EXHIBIT "A"
Sec. 36-281. 0-3 general office district.
(a) Purpose and intent. The 0-3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in new and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0-3 district is characterized by
freestanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utilities, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general office development.
(b) Use regulations.
(1) Permitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (medical, dental or optical).
ay eaipe
j. Duplication shop.
1. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
in. Family care facility.
n. Fire station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
q. Lab
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public use.
i
sip f�
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
ate seheal, kiwiet-g"tef* op ins . (Moved to
Conditional)
y. Rooming, lodging and boarding facilities.
z. School (business).
(Moved to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
1122900-v 1
cc. Studio (art, music, speech, drama, dance or other artistic endeavors).
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Accessory uses. The following accessory uses are permitted only in conjunction
with an allowable use or uses in the 0-3 district and shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total floor area on the site.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c. Book and stationery store.
d. Camera sho .
e. candy store.
f. Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
h. Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k. Health studio or spa.
1. Hobby shop.
m. Jewelry store.
n. Key shop.
o. Laundry pickup station.
p. Tailor shop.
(3) Conditional uses. Conditional uses are as follows:
a. Ambulance Service Post.
b. Animal clinic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops.
to .,4-e
e. Health studio or spa.
f. Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
g. Paa-hing' lam;
j. Orphanage.
k. School (commercial, trade or craft).
1
m. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education.
n. School (public or denominational).
1122900-v1
2012083512 ReceFved: 12/19/2012 3:12:58 PM
Recorded: 12/19/2012 03:19:19 PM Filed &
Recorded in Official Records of Larry Crane,
PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUITICOUNTY CLERK
4114t- Fees $80.00
ORDINANCE NO. 20 675
3 INANCE TO RECLASSIFY PROPERTY (WITH CONDITIONS)
4 LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AMENDING
5 THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK,
6 ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
7
8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
9 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS:
10 Section 1. That the zone classification of the following property be and is hereby changed (with
11 conditions) as indicated:
12 Z-8165-b — Described as part of the SE 1 A, NW 1/4 of Section 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little
13 Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:
14 Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
15 Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence N01°29'07"E
16 along the West line of said NW1A, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point
17 on the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along
18 said right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said
19 right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord
20 bearing and distance of N44153'23"E, 694.22 feet; thence N24°34'39"E
21 continuing along said right-of-way line, 1229.79 feet; thence northerly
22 continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius
23 curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N11°30'31 "E, 452.21 feet;
24 thence N01133'37"W continuing along said right-of-way line, 317.68 feet; thence
25 northerly continuing along said right-of-way line being the are of a 2909.79-foot
26 radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N04°30'02"W, 298.51
27 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly continuing along said right-of-
28 way line being the arc of a 2909.79-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
29 and distance of N10°10'56"W, 278.36 feet; thence N31°45'33"E, 35.40 feet to a
30 point on the south right-of-way line of Pebble Beach Drive; thence N76°41'17"E
31 along said south right-of-way line, 156.62 feet; thence S05°36'09"E, 321.39 feet;
32 thence S80151'35"W, 209.22 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.5665
1Page 1 of 101
acres, more or less. From R-2, Single -Family District, to OS, Open Space
j 2
District.
jl 3
and
4
Part of the NEl/4 SW1/4 and SETA NWIA of section 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little
5
Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:
6
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
7
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO1°29'07"E
8
along the west line of said NW 1 A, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
9
the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
10
right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said right -
I 11
of -way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
12
and distance of N44153'23"E, 694.22 feet; thence N24°34'39"E continuing along
13
said right-of-way line, 1229.79 feet; thence northerly continuing along said right-
, 14
of -way line being the arc of a 999.9-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
15
and distance of N 11 °30'31 T, 452.21 feet; thence NO °33'37"W continuing along
16
said right-of-way line, 317.68 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly
17
continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 2909.79-foot radius
' 18
curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N04°30'02"W, 298.51 feet;
19
thence N80°51'35"E, 209.22 feet; thence S81°15'00"E, 465.57 feet; thence
20
S45°41'36"E, 221.35 feet; thenceS01°23'54"W, 1134.35 feet; thence westerly
21
along the are of a 245.00-foot radius curve to the right, a chord bearing and
22
distance of N61'21'24"W, 336.75 feet; thence N 17°56'42"W, 170.05 feet; thence
23
northerly along the arc of a 305.00-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
24
and distance of N22°28'52"W, 48.24 feet; thence NOl °23'54"E, 594.56 feet.,
25
thence N8]°03'09"W427.35 feet to the point of beginning, containing 13,6934
26
acres, more or less. From R-2, Single -Family District, to 0-3, General Office
27
District.
28
and
29
Part of the SW1A of Section 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County,
30
Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:
31
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
32
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO]°29'07"E
33
along the West line of said NW1A, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point
t 34
on the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65112'07"E along
lPage 2 of 101
I
said right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said
2
right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord
3
bearing and distance of N44°53'23"E, 694.22 feet; thence N24°34'39"E
4
continuing along said right-of-way line, 757.68 feet to the point of beginning;
5
thence N24°34'39"E continuing along said right-of-way line, 472.11 feet; thence
6
northerly continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot
7
radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N 11 °30'31 "E, 452.21
8
feet; thence NOl°33'37"W continuing along said right-of-way line, 317.68 feet;
9
thence S81°03'09"E, 427.35 feet; thence SO1°23'54"W, 594.56 feet; thence
10
S13051'15"W, 922.45 feet; thence N00°52'17"W, 168.96 feet; thence
11
N17011'34"W, 70.10 feet; thence N73°31'33"W, 460.29 feet to the point of
12
beginning, containing 13.2102 acres, more or less. From R-2, Single -Family
13
District, to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District.
14
and
15
Part of the SW1/4 of Section 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County,
16
Arkansas more particularly described as follows:
17
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
18
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence N01 °29'07"E
19
along the West line of said NW1/4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point
20
on the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along
21
said right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said
22
right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord
23
bearing and distance of N44°53'23"E, 694.22 feet; thence N24°34'39"E
24
continuing along said right-of-way line, 617.71 feet to the point of beginning;
25
thence N24°34'39"E continuing along said right-of-way line, 139.97 feet; thence
26
S73°31'33"E, 460.43 feet; thence S17°11'34"E, 70.10 feet; thence S00°52'17"E,
27
168.96 feet; thence N5°25'21 "W, 575.00 feet to the point of beginning,
28
containing 2.1226 acres, more or less. From MF-18, Multi -Family District, to C-
29
1, Neighborhood Commercial District.
30
and
31
Part of the SW1/4 of Section 30, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County,
32
Arkansas more particularly described as follows:
33
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, block 19, the Villages of
34
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NOl°29'07"E
(Page 3 of 101
along the west line of said NW 1/4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
2
the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
3
right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said right-
4
of -way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
5
and distance of N52°02'45"E, 455.18 feet to the point of beginning; thence
6
northeasterly continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-
7
foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N31 °44'01 "E, 249.13
8
feet; thence N24°34'39"E continuing along said right-of-way line, 617.71 feet;
9
thence S65°25'21 "E, 575.00 feet; thence S37°31'02"W, 988.16 feet; thence
10
N51°06'36"W, 397.09 feet to the point of beginning, containing 9.9613 acres,
11
more or less. From MF-18, Multi -Family District, to C-1, Neighborhood
12
Commercial District.
13
and
14
Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 30 and part of the NW 1 /4 of Section 31, T-2-N, R-
15
13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as
16
follows:
17
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
18
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO1°29'07"E
19
along the west line of said N W 1 /4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
20
the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
21
right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said right-
22
of -way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
23
and distance of N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 feet; thence S30°l 5'52"E, 591.08 feet to the
24
point of beginning; thence N53°52'20"E, 212.88 feet; thence N44°01'02"E,
25
650.16 feet; thence N32°35'38"E, 182.13 feet; thence N00152'l7"W, 407.90 feet;
26
thence N37°31'02"E, 215.85 feet; thence S52°28'58"E, 366.23 feet; thence
27
S02°29'45"W, 295.82 feet; thence S37°31'02"W, 1119.88 feet; thence
28
N88°31'55"W, 401.39 feet; thence N30°15'52"W, 82.19 feet to the point of
29
beginning, containing 11,9565 acres, more or less. From R-2, Single -Family
30
District, to MF-12, Multi -Family District.
31
and
32
Part of the SW 1 /4 of Section 30 and part of the NW 1 /4 of Section 31, T-2-N, R-
33
13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as
34
follows:
IPage 4 of 101
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
2
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO 129'07"E
3
along the west line of said N W 1 /4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
4
the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
5
right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said right-
6
of -way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
7
and distance of N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 feet to the point of beginning; thence
8
northeasterly continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-
9
foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N43°11'29"E, 150.00
10
feet; thence S51 °06'36"E, 397.09 feet; thence N37°31'02"E, 988.16 feet; thence
11
S00°52'l7"E, 407.90 feet; thence S32°35'38"W, 182.13 feet; thence S44°01'02"E,
12
650.16 feet; thence S53°52'20"W, 212.88 feet; thence N30°15'52"W, 591.08 feet
13
to the point of beginning, containing 8.2803 acres, more or less. From MF-18,
14
Multi -Family District, to MF-12, Multi -Family District.
15
and
16
Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 30 and part of the NW 1/4 of Section 31, T-2-N, R-
17
13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as
18
follows:
19
Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
20
Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO]129'07"E
21
along the west line of said NW 1/4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
22
the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
23
right-of-way line, 160.46 feet to the point of beginning; thence N65°12'07"E
24
continuing along said right-of-way line, 216.08 feet; thence northeasterly
25
continuing along said right-of-way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius
26
curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 feet;
27
thence S30015'52"E, 591.08 feet; thence S53°52'20"W, 67.68 feet; thence
28
N88021'17"W, 515.19 feet; thence N33°21'28"W, 328.55 feet to the point of
29
beginning, containing 5.4620 acres, more or less. From MF-18, Multi -Family
30
District, OS, Open Space District.
31
and
32
Part of the SW 1 /4 of Section 30 and part of the NW 1 /4 of Section 31, T-2-N, R-
33
3-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as
34
follows:
[Page 5 of 101
I Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
2 Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO] °29'07"E
3 along the west line of said NW 1/4, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point on
4 the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along said
5 right-of-way line, 376.54 feet; thence northeasterly continuing along said right-
6 of -way line being the arc of a 999.93-foot radius curve to the left, a chord bearing
7 and distance of N56°20'51 "E, 307.83 feet; thence S30'l 5'52"E, 591.08 feet to the
8 point of beginning; thence S30015'52"E, 48.83 feet; thence N88°21'17"W, 79.31
9 feet; thence N53°52'20"E, 67.68 feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.0377
10 acres, more or less. From R-2, Single -Family District, to OS, Open Space
11 District.
12 and
13 Part of the NWIA of Section 31, T-2-N, R-13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County,
14 Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:
15 Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
16 Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO1°29'07"E
17 along the West line of said NW1A, Section 31, extended 542.66 feet to a point
18 on the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence N65°12'07"E along
19 said right-of-way line, 160.46 feet; thence S33°21'28"E, 328.55 feet to the point
20 of beginning; thence S88°2II7"E , 515.19 feet; thence S53°52'20"W, 422.50
21 feet; thence N33°21'28"W, 315.94 feet to the point of beginning, containing
22 1.5304 acres, more or less. From MF-18, Multi -Family District, to R-2, Single-
23 Family District.
24 and
25 Part of the SW 1 /4 of Section 30 and part of the N W 1 /4 of Section 31, T-2-N, R-
26 13-W, Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, more particularly described as
27 follows:
28 Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 16, Block 19, the Villages of
29 Wellington, an addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas; thence NO1 °29'07"E
30 along the West line of said NW1/4, Section 31, 345.00 feet to the point of
31 beginning; thence NO1°29'07"E continuing along said West line extended, 197.66
32 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Rahling Road; thence
33 N65°12'07"E along said right-of-way line, 160.46 feet; thence S33°21'28"E,
34 328.55 feet; thence N88°21'17"W; 331.58 feet to the point of beginning,
IPage 6 of 101
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
containing 1.3507 acres, more or less. From R-2, Family District, to OS, Open
Space District (east side of Rahling Road, south of Pebble Beach Drive).
Section 2. That the zoning of the above described property is subject to the attached conditions
which were proposed by the applicant for the property described in Section 1 of this ordinance and which
shall be covenants running with the land to bind subsequent grantees of the property. The conditions are
Attachments "A" and "B".
Section 3. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little
Rock and designated district map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to
affect and designate the changes provided for in Sections 1 and 2 hereof.
Section 4. That the ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days after the date of its
passage and approval.
Section 5. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or
word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or
adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and
effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional were not originally a part of the
ordinance.
Section 6. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent
with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency.
PASSED: December 18, 2012
ATTEST:
'Susan ngley, U%ty Clerk
APPR D AS TO LEGAL FORM:
��! �k04-� d.
Thomas M. Carpenter, City or ey
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
APPROVEED:�*
1/ I /i I �I
IPage 7 of 101
rk'Stodola, Mayor
Attachment "A"
Z-8165-B
Conditions as Proposed by the Applicant
List of additional points for inclusion in the proposed ordinance rezoning certain property on
Rahling Road:
l . Restrictions to the "0-3" area are as follows:
(i) List of specific permitted and conditional uses IS attached as Attachment "B"
hereto;
(ii) Height limitation on building of no more than three (3) stories; and
(iii) Building footprints limited to 20,000 square -foot per floor (total of 60,000
square -feet for three (3)-story office building);
2. Site plan review for all commercial and office development.
3. All developments subject to Chenal Valley Architectural Control Committee review and
approval.
4. Chenal Valley Master Property Owner's Association will govern use, maintenance and
upkeep of all properties.
5. Removal of Plantation Drive as a through collector street from the Villages of Wellington to
Rahling Road, provided, however, that Plantation Drive may be extended to serve a single
family residential area contiguous to the northern boundary of the Villages of Wellington.
6. Construction of only so much of Beckenham Drive is required by the boundary street
ordinance (no off -site construction in the S 112 SW 114, Section 30, T2N, RI 3 W and no
connection to the eastern most portion of Beckenham Drive.)
(Page 8 of 101
indicates Deltic has
agreed to eliminate the use in Jan. 2009.
Attachment "B"
Sec. 36-281. 0-3 general office district.
(a) Purpom and intent. The 0.3 general office district is established to
accommodate offices and associated administrative, executive and professional uses
in new and existing structures together with specified institutional and accessory
uses. This section applies to such district. The 0.3 district is characterized by
freestanding buildings and ancillary parking, and shall be limited to arterial street
locations in developed areas of the city and other carefully selected areas where
public utilities, community facilities and other public services are adequate to
support general ❑ffim development.
(b) Use regulations.
(1) Porraitted uses. Permitted uses are as follows:
a. Bank or savings and loan office.
b. Church.
c. Clinic (medical, dental or optical).
4-een1&r.
na.. earg _d 4.
j. Duplication shop.
I. Establishment of a religious, charitable or philanthropic organization.
m. Family care facility.
n. Fire station.
o. Governmental or private recreational uses, including but not limited to golf
courses, tennis courts, swimming pools, playgrounds, day camps and passive
recreational open space.
�.--7 %b arafie*y+
r. Library, art gallery, museum or similar public use.
ae,
v. Office (general or professional).
w. Photography studio.
Conditional)
t .(Moved to
y. Rooming, lodging and boarding facilities.
z. School (business).
(Moved to Conditional)
bb. Studio (broadcasting and recording).
lPage 9 of 101
cc. Studio (art, music, speech, drama, dance or other artistic endeavors),
dd. Travel Bureau.
(2) Accvswry uses. The following accessory uses are permitted only in conjunction
with an alluwablo use or uses in the 0.3 district and shall not exceed ten (10)
percent of the total floor area on the site.
a. Antique shop.
b. Barber and beauty shop.
c. Book and stationery store.
d. Camera shcr .
candy store.
f Clothing store.
g. Custom sewing or millinery.
h. Drugstore or pharmacy.
i. Eating place without drive-in service.
j. Florist shop.
k. Health studio or spa.
I. Hobby shop.
m, Jewelry store.
n. Key shop.
o. Laundry pickup station.
p. Tailor shop.
(3) Condit,'on❑1 uses. Conditional uses are as follows:
a. Ambulance Service Post.
b. Animal clinic (enclosed).
c. Barber and beauty shops,
e. Health studio or spa.
f. Job printing, lithographer, printing or blueprinting.
j. Orphanage.
It. School (commercial, trade or craft).
h- k i pA..
in. Private school, kindergarten or institution for special education.
n. School (public or denominational).
(Page 10 of 101
Area Zoning
Case: Z-8165-B N
Location: East Side of Rahiing Rd.
and South of Pebble Beach Rd.
Ward: 5
PD: 19 0 300600 1,200 Feet
CT: 42.19
TRS: T2N R13W30
Land Use Plan
�f -lid{�kj � •.�_ .
Case: Z-8165-B N
Location: East Side of Rahling Rd.
and South of Pebble Beach Rd.
Ward: 5
PD: 19 0 300600 1,200 Feet
CT: 42.19
TRS: T2N R13W30
Page 1 of 2
Bozynski, Tony
From: arkansas-active-comm-info-ex@googlegroups.com on behalf of david laumer
[david.laumer@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 10:59 PM
To: Mayor; City Manager; board; Hurst, Stacy; Director Hines; Director Adcock
Cc: david@arktimes.com; Dana Gaddy; 'kborrelli@sbcglobal.net'; Angela S. Baste; Andy Lain; Chaney
Rachel O; Chang Jason Y; Craig Bowlby; Dana Gaddy; Dave Slaton; dbandpb@sbcglobal.net;
donna_cone@sbcglobal.net; Hadley Matthew V; Jeff Fairman; jo-bob@att.net; Judy Bell;
kajones@ualr.edu; Kyle Ross; Lewis Mahoney; Mcsweeney Jean C; Miller Grover P.; Mitchell Anita;
Morello Roy; Rodney Blocker; sara@leatherbrothers.com; Smith Charles W; Sue Carpenter; Tsai Pao-
feng; Val Carr; West Delia; Williams Linda D "COM Research"
Subject: Say No to Rahling Road Rezone -Say Yes to Complete Streets
we have finally had enough of the sort of private dealing that
passes for public engagement and public decision making in
Little Rock.
if you do not know what we are referring to, take a close look
at the process right in front of us in the proposed Rahling Road
Rezone to find a couple of neighborhoods and a developer being
manipul aced by a City Director for the benefit of his
neighborhood. This sort of self dealing drives homeowners to
the suburbs and believe it or note, it has everything to do with
how this city develops streets. Here is how it works:
• The city refuses to pay for streets and instead
forces developers to pay for them;
• Developers are in the business of development and so
the trade-off is a little extra intensification now
and again to pay for a road here and there;
• The losers in that process are the surrounding
neighborhoods where hundreds of family's investments
are based upon their reasonable understanding of
existing zoning, but
• A few days before Thanksgiving a proposal appears that
proposes to put office and commercial uses where the houses
should have been.
• And, that is all the notice you get in this process that
tends to pit one neighborhood against the other.
The other dirty little secret of the city 's streets deals is
that these schemes tend to force cheaper collector streets into
service as de facto arterial streets and, again, the victims are
the homeowners whose neighborhoods are overwhelmed by traffic.
Again, this behavior drives investment out of the city where
buying a home in Little Rock can be a gamble and the odds can
get long.
. The usual solution is to cut a
neighborhood over the hill and
with this Rahling Road Rezone.
agenda item on a holiday sleigh
and Christmas and all stops are
most of us even know what he is
deal and burn the
that is exactly what.we see
Our Director is moving this
ride between Thanksgiving
out to get this done before
proposing: less intense land
12/18/2012
Page 2 of 2
use near his home, a disconnected street grid near his home while
office and commercial replace the single family homes at the
other end of the development where we have to deal with traffic
and such.
. You cannot blame Lance, he is just looking out for his
investments, but we are asking for a new way of thinking that
does not set neighbors against neighbors in this fight to avoid
the real negative impacts of these unnecessary street Fights.
There is no justification for linking arterial streets with
collectors, and in fact, it is exactly what not to do. The underlying
assumptions about connectivity are wrong here and I say that as
someone in a position to make that sort of assessment. But, you do
not have to take my word for it, just ask anyone on Pebble Beach or
Dorado Beach or Sawgrass what happens when you do that.
So, again, you can't blame Lance -we are all afraid of these crazy
rouge collector streets once they are connected as short circuits
between arterials. Lance is just looking out for his investment, but
can't we look just a little more broadly and find solutions that do
not involve creating winners and losers?
we need to unwind the Pebble Beach connection instead of replicating
it in other neighborhoods. It simply does not work and there is a
solution that would, but we can't even begin that argument here --
there is no time under the schedule adopted by the City Manager --and
again we point to a decision process that takes place before the
public involvement is ever initiated.
In just the few days we have had our signs up on Dorado Beach,
Sawgrass, Montvale, and Beckenham we have collected over 300
signatures of people who tell us that they are ready to get together
and help the city see a bigger picture where streets are public
places.
Every one of our petitions demands Complete Streets --those petitions
should be in your packets and we will bring copies.
You do not need this intensification to pay for these streets.
Instead, let's get Gary Toth or Dan Burden or John Norquist to take a
look (see Links Below), you will find that there is every reason to
stop this sort of road building --it hurts neighborhoods and creates
places where you cannot make a choice to ride a bike, walk or drive a
car. we can do better. If we are to compete, we must do better.
Please SUPPORT YOUR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING STAFF and say no to Lance
and this scheme to benefit his neighborhood at the expense of the
rest of us.
And, then let's sit back down with Lance and the Mayor and work for
the best interests of Little Rock -and for Wellington.
we finally have the money to do this right, so why not take the time,
hire a consultant and learn about the possibilities that are open to
us if we just work together?
David "Bud" Laumer, AICP
HPOA Board
www.activeplaces.us
www.live-active.org
12/18/2012
Page 1 of 1
Bozynski, Tony
From: Floriani, Vince
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:58 PM
To: Bozynski, Tony
Subject: Fwd: Pebble Beach Traffic
Below are bill's estimate for 2015. There appears to be a 10% increase per year. Call me if you
need anything else
Vince
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Henry, Bill" <BHenr +mac ,littlerock.org>
Date: August 14, 2012 7:51:55 PM CDT
To: "Floriani, Vince" <VFloriani a.littlerock,4rg>
Subject: Pebble Beach Traffic
2007 adt at Montvale 2941vpd
2007 adt at Hinson 6376vpd
Rahling Rd traffic 2006 at Pebble Beach 8,600 vpd
Rahling Rd traffic 2010 at Pebble Beach 12,000 vpd
Growth rate = 40% over 4 years. Say 10% per year. Based on that assumption, 2015
traffic will be as follows:
2015 adt at Montvale = 5,294 vpd
2015 adt at Hinson = 8,229 vpd
Traffic is assumed not to increase as much at the Hinson Road end of Pebble Beach since
the residential portion of traffic is not assumed to increase since the area adjacent to
Pebble Beach is built out. Most of the increase is due to cut -through traffic attempting to
access Rahling from Hinson and Hinson to Rahling.
William Henry, P.E.
Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering
621 S. Broadway
Little Rock, AR 72201
501-379-1816 office
501-340-4853 fax
8/15/2012
Page 1 of 2
Bozynski, Tony
From: Floriani, Vince
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 11:07 AM
To: Hood, Mike; Carney, Dana; Minyard, Brian; tdaters@whitedaters.com; Beck, Steve; Honeywell,
Jon; Malone, Walter; Bozynski, Tony; Charles, Nathan
Cc: Henry, Bill; Banihatti, Nat
Subject: FW: Rahling Road Traffic Counts
Attachments: WC329D1395.PDF
Attached is the traffic counts recorded on Rahling Road on October 22, 2012 through October 24, 2012.
Volumes show in excess of 13,000 vehicles. Per City Ordinance, Rahling Road widening requirements
have been triggered.
Vince Floriani, P.E.
Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering
701 W. Markham St.
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
501-371-4817
From: Clay, Greg
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 9:46 AM
To: Banihatti, Nat; Floriani, Vince
Subject: RE: Rahling Road Traffic Counts
See attached
From: Banihatti, Nat
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:18 PM
To: Clay, Greg
Subject: FW: Rahling Road Traffic Counts
Greg:
Please get counts for Rahling near Taylor Loop (south of intersection)
Thanks
-Nat
From: Henry, Bill
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 5:01 PM
To: Banihatti, Nat
Subject: Fw: Rahling Road Traffic Counts
Ph
William Henry
Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Little Rock Public Works
Traffic Engineering Division
501-379-1816
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE Phone
11/5/2012
Page 2 of 2
-----Original message -----
From: "Floriani, Vince" <VFlorian-Alittlerock.orp
To: "Henry, Bill" <BHenryCcr�.littlerock.org>
Sent: Thu, Oct 18, 2012 21:51:06 GMT+00:00
Subject: Rahling Road Traffic Counts
Bill,
What is the latest traffic count for Rahling Road near Taylor Loop Road?
Vince Floriani, P.E.
Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering
701 W. Markham St.
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
501-371-4817
11/5/2012
CD
N ❑
L
rJ
CD
co
p�
(C O C
a
U)
}ui U)
o
U
m
�
to
a
W
N
Ix
w
Ct m N
O a04 o
a
m �aa
J C6
N� 1��
ja
o co-j
V
" V
V
Q
v ,
\ h
N
�
4
Ctl■ mmN OM h•-06; d• Nfp (D�m �Q 1-hh..O Opp
p (fl M :IX M QD• 1D CO 0 O S. O a-� I� ID h- E7
. �'�: d'�M V d•M CF d' ID�I�IDM�a-
c'
0
h-d' COW OfD dbb•0(p��1+7�010 rCY C7
MC-1 tD V'
a
7
t
8 i y• Y• y•• y y y. � y• y R a
S
err ! r • r 1 . • • . • . • • "• 1 ■ ►
U
c
0
C
G
a
Co
C
D
�DI CCi W N67;p �"��d•• • . • • �_ y s, ;• } • ,i a s
eG r 7,r •
m r Cal �•
7
co
ram, W Y ii1 l`7 W 'V'•cM9 �� n Ln M'O �O} tO+ pip R W •� � O a C] m
Y r r• ti d M M ln; V' f7; R V' �57'Iti:- 47 "C, N N
j �y
j LD CD •- r. LD W: fCN�VDp r(�..; cl r- L(rn� tppt a0. It A�po. L6 1 - NE3 M W C�
r. N r'1fl M M M d' dam" M �t l47 Y+". ifJ M N
• : • r . • . • • ■ - P. ! MD N y� 11((��• ��..77 iO W h• — m a Lei
an'1 M- 0) M T O h- N
5 -
p po p �y
�QOO O'`� O4GS���000O �0000SC?
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 Q O5r O O O O c) o O 4 O ri
rZ o cD. o c
❑ O
O
N
it C to O C
ti CO N � tl
� v
a �
I
i
a
0
a
0
O
D
� 4
r �
P
O
N O W O
r' ~
4
n vAo^
D O M1
1`
M
D`-O�C7 h
a +ts'n o LotD O0
14 C) O G
r=
r
T
V09OTC)LN
7 � In a
L CL
M
O
N
C.
0
O
0
a o
U1 ¢
Page 1 of 2
Bozynski, Tony
From: Floriani, Vince
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:50 AM
To: Bozynski, Tony
Subject: RE: Pebble Beach Traffic
Yes sir
Vince Floriani, P.E.
Little Rock Public Works -Civil Engineering
701 W. Markham St.
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
501-371-4817
From: Bozynski, Tony
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 8:42 AM
To: Floriani, Vince
Subject: RE: Pebble Beach Traffic
Thank you.
Are the 2015 counts for Pebble Beach assuming that the other two collectors are taken off the MSP?
From: Floriani, Vince
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 8:58 PM
To: Bozynski, Tony
Subject: Fwd: Pebble Beach Traffic
Below are bill's estimate for 2015. There appears to be a 10% increase per year. Call me if you need
anything else
Vince
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Henry, Bill" <BHen@littlerock.org>
Date: August 14, 2012 7:51:55 PM CDT
To: "Floriani, Vince" <VFloriani(?Iittlerock.orJz>
Subject: Pebble Beach Traffic T
2007 adt at Montvale 2941vpd
2007 adt at Hinson 6376vpd
Rahling Rd traffic 2006 at Pebble Beach 8,600 vpd
Rahling Rd traffic 2010 at Pebble Beach 12,000 vpd
Growth rate = 40% over 4 years. Say 10% per year. Based on that assumption, 2015
traffic will be as follows:
2015 adt at Montvale = 5,294 vpd
2015 adt at Hinson = 8,229 vpd
9/7/2012
Page 2 of 2
Traffic is assumed not to increase as much at the Hinson Road end of Pebble Beach since the
residential portion of traffic is not assumed to increase since the area adjacent to Pebble Beach is
built out. Most of the increase is due to cut -through traffic attempting to access Rahling from
Hinson and Hinson to Rahling.
William Henry, P.E.
Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering
621 S. Broadway
Little Rock, AR 72201
501-379-1816 office
501-340-4853 fax
9/7/2012
Traffic Study
Proposed Re -Zoning
Rahling Road Development
prepared for.•
White-Daters & Associates, Inca
EP I
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
• CIVIL & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING •
5507 Ranch Drive - Suite 205 (501) 868-3999
Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 Fax (501) 868-97 10
Rahling Road
Little Rock, Arkansas
T
lII�s ArE-z F
ARIKANSA: `:
-ter
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER
ERNEST J. PETERS
., No. 4682 10�
Project No.: P-1378-A
November 16, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
INTRODUCTION
1
STUDY AREA
4
STREET SYSTEM
5
LAND -USE PLAN PROPOSED CHANGES
6
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
7
TRIP GENERATION & TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
11
TRAFFIC VOLUME ASSIGNMENTS
13
CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
15
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS
21
OTHER ISSUES
25
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
27
FIGURES
30
FR0000I17�:/
Proposed Re -Zoning Map
Trip -Generation Data
Vehicle Turning Movement Count Data
Capacity and Level of Service Calculations
Traffic Signal Warrants and Results
Generalized Service Volumes Table from FDOT Quality and LOS Handbook
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. conducted a traffic study
for the assessment of an application to the City of Little
Rock by the developer for proposed re -zoning and land -use
changes to the City Land -Use Plan (LUP) in Little Rock,
Arkansas. The study area is on the west side of Rahling
Road, just south of Pebble Beach Drive in Little Rock, Ar-
kansas. The primary issue of this study is traffic operational
conditions for the proposed re -zoning land -use changes. A
copy of maps depicting the existing zoned land -uses and the
proposed re -zoned land -uses of the study area are included in
the Appendix of this report for reference.
Existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were gath-
ered while school was in session (August, 2012) at the inter-
section of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive.
Additionally, existing 24-hour traffic counts were also made
while school was in session (August, 2012) at the following
locations in the vicinity of the study area:
• Rahling Road approaches to Pebble Beach Drive
• Pebble Beach Drive approach and departure to/from
Rahling Road
• Rahling Road south of Pebble Beach Drive.
The existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes and 24-
hour counts are shown on Figure 3, "Existing Traffic Vol-
umes."
The study has involved preparing estimated projected traffic
volumes for full build -out of the proposed re -zoned land -
uses of the study tracts. Additionally, ten-year growth ap-
plied to the existing thru traffic volumes on Rahling Road
were also included in projected traffic volumes used in
analysis of this study. Capacity and level of service (LOS)
analysis for existing and for projected traffic operations
(with and without the LaMarche Road future connection) for
the AM and PM peak hours was conducted for the intersec-
tion of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road. The 10-year
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 1
full build -out projected AM and PM peak hours traffic vol-
umes are depicted on Figure 6, "Projected 10-Year Traffic
Volumes," and Figure 7, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Vol-
umes with LaMarche Drive Connection." Projected 10-year
24-hour volumes have been projected with and without the
LaMarche Drive connection made to Taylor Loop Road.
Additionally, projected 10-year 24-hour volumes have also
been estimated with the LaMarche Drive connection made to
Taylor Loop Road and with Beckenham Drive Connection
(to the eastern portion in the Hillsborough subdivision), de-
picted on Figure 8, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Volumes with
LaMarche Drive Connection and Beckenham Drive Connec-
tion."
This is a report of methodology and findings relating to a
traffic engineering study undertaken to:
• Evaluate existing traffic conditions and projected traffic
conditions for the nearby intersection of Rahling Road
and Pebble Beach Drive to include full build -out of the
proposed re -zoned land -uses of the study tracts plus 10-
year background growth at the study intersection (with
and without the future LaMarche Drive connection made
to Taylor Loop Road).
Identify the effects on traffic operations resulting from
existing traffic (plus 10-year background growth) in
combination with full build -out generated traffic associ-
ated with the proposed re -zoned land -use plan changes
(with and without the future LaMarche Drive connection
made to Taylor Loop Road).
■ Evaluate traffic operations for the nearby intersection of
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive and make recom-
mendations for improvements which may be necessary
and appropriate for acceptable traffic operations.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS. INC.
Page 2
■ Present findings relative to traffic operations for the
nearby intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach
Drive and assess developer -proposed re -zoned land -use
changes to the study area.
In the following sections of this report there are presented
traffic data, study methods, findings and recommendations
of this traffic engineering investigation. The traffic engi-
neering study is technical in nature. Analysis techniques em-
ployed are those most commonly used in the traffic engi-
neering profession for traffic operational analysis. Certain
data and calculations relative to traffic operational analysis
are referenced in the report. Complete calculations and data
are included in the Appendix of the report.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC. Page 3
1 1 {;rrr..fir
The location of the study area is within the City of Little Rock
in Pulaski County, Arkansas. The study intersection location
and vicinity are shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2, below.
JLJJ
ENGINEERS. INC. -
Page 4
Rahling Road, is proposed to be improved by the developer
to a four -lane median divided roadway with median breaks
and the addition of a southbound left -turn lane at Pebble
Beach Drive, and certain future access drive locations along
the study tracts. Rahling Road is classified as a Minor Arte-
rial on the City of Little Rock Master Street Plan (MSP).
Pebble Beach Drive, at Rahling Road consists of a west-
bound right -turn lane, a westbound left -turn lane and an east-
bound receiving lane. Pebble Beach Drive is classified as a
Collector on the City of Little Rock MSP.
The projected AM and PM peak hour projected volumes
used for intersection analysis in this study do not include any
future connection of Beckenham Drive to Rahling Road.
However, projected 10-year traffic volumes have been esti-
mated to include future connection of Beckenham Drive to
Rahling Road.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 5
i rrf fr �-frrd: Sr
As a part of this study, an assessment of traffic associated
with an application to the City of Little Rock by the devel-
oper for proposed zoning and land -use changes has been in-
cluded in this analysis. The proposed land use changes are
depicted below (a copy is also included in the Appendix of
this report for reference).
Ful
PETERS &ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 6
I C f r; 00,dr,r
Hourly, 24-hour traffic counts were made at the following
locations in the vicinity of the study area and are summa-
rized as follows:
STREET
24-HOUR
TWO-WAY
VOLUME
TABLE
&
CHART
Rahling Road, Just South of Pebble Beach Drive
13,719
Table 1/Chart 1
Rahling Road Approaches to Pebble Beach Drive
12,576
Table 1/Chart 1
Pebble Beach Drive, Just East of Rahling Road
2,722
Table 3/Chart 3
Hourly, 24-hour traffic count data are summarized on Tables
and Charts 1, 2 and 3.
Other traffic count data collected as a part of this study in-
cludes AM and PM peak hour vehicle turning movement
counts at the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach
Drive. The AM and PM peak hour turning movement count
data at this intersection are summarized in the following
peak hour turning movement Charts 4 and 5 and are pre-
sented in more detail in the Appendix of this report.
24-hour counts and AM and PM peak hour vehicle turning
movement counts made as a part of this study are shown on
Figure 3, "Existing Traffic Volumes."
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 7
TIME
Rahling Road, South of Pebble Beach Dd\e
Northbound
Southbound
NB + SB
01:00 PM
307
401
708
02:00 PM
406
517
923
03:00 PM
502
435
937
04:00 PM
584
597
1181
05:00 PM
672
736
1408
06:00 PM
495
461
956
07:00 PM
445
331
776
08:00 PM
301
262
563
09:00 PM
175
157
332
10:00 PM
80
94
174
11:00 PM
32
33
65
12:00 AM
16
11
27
01:00 AM
6
4
10
02:00 AM
6
2
8
03:00 AM
1
3
4
04:00 AM
14
17
31
05:00 AM
63
62
125
06:00 AM
145
136
281
07:00 AM
682
615
1297
08:00 AM
420
635
1055
09:00 AM
302
316
618
10:00 AM
309
288
597
11:00 AM
414
436
850
12:00 PM
399
394
793
24-Hour Total:
6776
6943
1 13719
800
700
600
d
E 500
0
> aoo
0 300
200
100
Table 2 — Chart 2 24-Hour Traffic Counts
Rahling Road Approaches to Pebble Beach Drive
Tr f
800 ¢iivad.�4ulh.vCP.4�Ale Baum �r[ve�i[3Wc-HpY
1 Northbound
700
■ Soutgmund
600
r: 500
0
> aoo
T
0 300
200
-
100
0
Hour
Table 1— Chart 1 24-Hour Traffic Counts
Rahling Road, Just South of Pebble Beach Drive
Northbound)
Ot- S' r di O$, Oh O� cid 4 Nv Rry- Oa C2p 4p, '0" Oy
Hour
1j PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC-
TIME
Rahling Road Approaches
to Pebble Beach Drive
Northbound
Southbound
NB + SB
01:00 PM
307
329
636
02:00 PM
406
362
768
03:00 PM
502
413
915
04:00 PM
584
389
973
05:00 PM
672
452
1124
06:00 PM
495
383
878
07:00 PM
445
355
800
08:00 PM
301
262
563
09:00 PM
175
143
318
10:00 PM
80
71
151
11:00 PM
32
27
59
12:00 AM
16
7
23
01:00 AM
6
3
9
02:00 AM
6
3
9
03:00 AM
1
0
1
04:00 AM
14
8
22
05:00 AM
63
29
92
06:00 AM
145
149
294
07:00 AM
682
606
1288
08:00 AM
420
586
1006
09:00 AM
302
291
593
10:00 AM
309
226
535
11:00 AM
414
334
748
12:00 PM
399
374
773
24-Hour Total:
6776
5800
12576
Page 8
TIME
Pebble Beach Dd\e at Rahling Road
Eastbound
Westbound
EB + WB
01:00 PM
78
75
153
02:00 PM
101
63
164
03:00 PM
94
128
222
04:00 PM
137
76
213
05:00 PM
144
119
263
06:00 PM
104
128
232
07:00 PM
78
96
174
08:00 PM
66
46
112
09:00 PM
31
39
70
10:00 PM
16
5
21
11:00 PM
6
1
7
12:00 AM
5
3
8
01:00 AM
1
0
1
02:00 AM
0
1
1
03:00 AM
0
0
0
04:00 AM
1
0
1
05:00 AM
3
12
15
06:00 AM
12
27
39
07:00 AM
223
120
343
08:00 AM
100
100
200
09:00 AM
49
68
117
10:OO AM
44
61
105
11:00 AM
65
63
128
12:00 PM
60
72
132
24-Hour Total:
1418
1304
2722
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
"GI
-1-1d...
` INC
250
200
150
100
■ Eastbound
■ Westbound
Hour
Table 3 — Chart 3 24-Hour Traffic Counts
Pebble Beach Drive, Just East of Rahling Road
Page 9
m
E
7
15
I50
100
10
1 11
d
1
50 •
50
0 ^j�
0
5
a
O
a
N
a
O
a
N
a
O
a
N
a
O
a
N
Chart 4
AM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive.
Chart 5
PM Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive.
@ Flel Pebble Beech Rd RN Wg RA.
Irmn W lThN From East-Righl F— Swdh-Right
ftvWj Rn Pebble Beach Rd . RrplSryl FY
'rom hbelM1 Left Feb. Eei-Left Ylab SarCrfThru
200
00
60
-15
00
10
501,
U0
50
0
g�
��
�
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
o
N
c
N
o
N
o
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time of Day
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Rahling Rd.
0
ao w
1
8U �
�c1
1 - PM' ount Data Cr
04:3.0 ai
05 5 P 3
Q
ko
M 'I
W) 11
3�
r7 tp
d Q M
ov, co to T-
North
0 Rahlina Rd. 0
Page 10
I r- if F I . (�Sr
The Trip Generation, an Informational Report (8th Edition),
2008, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) and The Trip Generation Software (Version 6 by Mi-
crotrans), were utilized in calculating the magnitude of traf-
fic volumes expected to be generated by the existing zoned
land uses and the proposed land use changes for the study
tracts along the east side of Rahling Road, just south of
Pebble Beach Drive. These are reliable sources for this in-
formation and are universally used in the traffic engineering
profession. Proposed zoning changes have been assumed to
be included in projected 10-year traffic conditions.
Using the selected trip -generation rates, calculations were
made as a part of this study to provide a reliable estimate of
traffic volumes that can be expected to be associated with
the proposed land use of each study tract. Applying the ap-
propriate trip -generation rates to the land uses proposed for
these tracts makes these calculations. Results of this calcu-
lation are summarized on Table 4, "Trip -Generation Sum-
mary and Comparison."
Residential, commercial and office traffic, as will be associ-
ated with several of these tracts, ordinarily does contribute
to the adjacent street traffic conditions during the on -street
AM and PM peak traffic hours. Accordingly, the AM and
PM peak traffic periods of the adjacent streets have war-
ranted primary traffic analysis as a part of this study.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
INOI%' ERS, INC
Page 11
ri rw rr
ZONING
24-HOUR
TWO-WAYEXISTING
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK
HOUR
APPROX. ITE
WEEKDAYVEHICLE
TRIPS
VEHICLE
TRIPS
SIZE CODEENTER
EXi7
ENTER
EXIT
Residential Single -Family (R 2) (41.83 Acres)
82 Lots 210
785
16 46
52
30
Residential Multi -Family (MF-18) (20 Acres)
360 Units 220
2 394
36 148
144
79
3179
52 194
196
lag
TOTALS:
TOTAL ENTERING + EXITING
246
PROPOSED !
24-Ha UR
TWO-WAYAM
PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK
HOUR
APPROX, FTE
WEEKDAYVEHICLE
TRIPS
VEHICLE
TRIPS
SIZE CODEENTER
EXiTENTER
EXIT
Office Tract (13.7 Acres)
120,000
1,321
163 23
30
149
CammerCial Tracts (13.21 Acres, 2.12 Acres and 9.96 Acres)
165,000 Sq. Ft.
F220
7,096
0 0
184
234
Residential Multi -Family (MF-12) (8.28 Acres and 11.96 Acres))
243 Units
1,616
24 100
97
53
❑pen Space (1.57 Acres, 5.46 Acres and 1.35 Acres)
1.38 Acres
0
0 0
0
0
10 a33
187 123
311
436
TOTALS:
TOTAL ENTERING + EXITHM
310
Table 4 — Trip -Generation Summary
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 12
i
Once projected traffic was estimated for the site, directional
distributions were made to reflect the percent of anticipated
left and right -turns at the nearby intersection of Rahling Road
and Pebble Beach Drive. Directional distribution percentages
used in this study are shown on Figure 4, "Directional Distri-
bution - Site Traffic." These proposed land use site -generated
traffic volumes are depicted on Figure 5, "Proposed Re -Zoning
Site -Generated Traffic Volumes."
Values shown on Figure 3, "Existing Traffic Volumes," have
been combined with projected traffic volumes shown on Fig-
ure 5, "Proposed Re -Zoning Site -Generated Traffic Volumes,"
plus ten-year growth applied to the existing thru traffic vol-
umes on Rahling Road to account for ten years of background
growth in traffic volumes. These 10-year projected traffic vol-
umes are depicted on Figure 6, "Projected 10-Year Traffic
Volumes." Also shown on Figure 6 are the projected traffic
volumes for existing zoning plus 10-year background growth.
Additionally, 10-year traffic volumes were also projected to
assume the future LaMarche Drive connection made to Taylor
Loop Road. These 10-year projected traffic volumes are de-
picted on Figure 7, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Volumes with
LaMarche Drive Connection."
Traffic volumes shown on Figures 3, 6 and 7 are the values
used in capacity and level of service calculations conducted as
a part of this study. The effect of existing background traffic
(i.e. the adjacent street non -site traffic which exists), back-
ground traffic as well as projected traffic associated with the
proposed land uses in the immediate vicinity of the nearby in-
tersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive has thus
been accounted for in this analysis.
Also shown on Figures 6 and 7 are projected 24-hour volumes
with existing zoning and proposed re -zoning. As shown on
Figure 6, there is expected to be only approximately 15 percent
higher 10-year projected traffic volumes on Rahling Road with
proposed re -zoning land -uses than with the existing zoning.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 13
1 f r Tr �`► ��f� �r
Additionally, projected 10-year 24-hour volumes have also
been estimated with the LaMarche Drive connection made to
Taylor Loop Road and with Beckenham Drive Connection
(to the eastern portion in the Hillsborough subdivision), de-
picted on Figure 8, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Volumes with
LaMarche Drive Connection and Beckenham Drive Connec-
tion."
If the Beckenham Drive Connection (to the eastern portion
in the Hillsborough subdivision) to Rahling Road is con-
structed, there is expected to be approximately six percent
less traffic on Rahling Road than if it not constructed. This
assumes the LaMarche Drive Connection to be constructed
and with the proposed zoning.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 14
r` r
I rre., ' , �r f �-. , .rr . �r
Generally, the "capacity" of a street is a measure of its ability
to accommodate a certain magnitude of moving vehicles. It
is a rate as opposed to a quantity, measured in terms of vehi-
cles per hour. More specifically, street capacity refers to the
maximum number of vehicles that a street element (e.g. an
intersection) can be expected to accommodate in a given
time period under the prevailing roadway and traffic condi-
tions.
Traffic operational analysis for the study intersection were
evaluated based on the methodologies outlined in the High-
way Capacity Manual, 2010 Edition, published by the Trans-
portation Research Board. The operating conditions at an
intersection are graded by the "level of service" experienced
by drivers. Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of
traffic operating conditions and is rated from "A" to "P.
LOS "A" represents the most desirable condition with free -
flow movement of traffic with minimal delays. LOS "F"
generally indicates severely congested conditions with ex-
cessive delays to motorists. Intermediate grades of B, C, D,
and E reflect incremental increases in the average delay per
stopped vehicle. Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle.
The table below shows the upper limit of delay associated
with each level of service for signalized and un-signalized
intersections.
Intersection Level of Service Delay Thresholds
Level of Service
_(LOS)
Signalized
Un-Si ngnalized
A
< 10 Seconds
< 10 Seconds
B
< 20 Seconds
< 15 Seconds
C
< 35 Seconds
< 25 Seconds
D
< 55 Seconds
< 35 Seconds
E
< 80 Seconds
< 50 Seconds
F
> 80 Seconds
>_ 50 Seconds
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 15
i rff � �r �Zftrr.r�r
The LOS rating deemed acceptable varies by community,
facility type and traffic control device. LOS "D" is the desir-
able goal for movements at un-signalized intersections that
must yield to other movements; however, a LOS "E" or "F"
is often accepted for low to moderate traffic volumes where
the installation of a traffic signal is not warranted by the con-
ditions at the intersection or the location is deemed undesir-
able for signalization for other reasons. Other reasons may
include the close proximity of an existing traffic signal or the
presence of a convenient alternative route. For signalized
intersections, level of service and average delay relate to all
vehicles using the intersection. LOS "D" is the typical desir-
able standard for signalized intersections. The study intersec-
tion was evaluated using the Synchro analysis software
package based on Highway Capacity Manual methods.
Sidra Intersection Version 5.1.9.2068 was used for analysis
of the proposed roundabout. These computer programs have
been proven to be reliable when used to analyze capacity and
levels of traffic service under various operating conditions.
Detailed results for all capacity calculations are included in
the Appendix. The adjacent street weekday AM and PM
peak traffic periods were used for these calculations. Factors
included in the analysis are as follows
• Existing traffic volumes and patterns.
• Proposed land uses.
• Directional distribution of projected traffic volumes.
Existing and proposed intersection geometry (including
elements such as turn lanes, curb radii, etc.).
Existing background traffic volumes with 10-year
growth.
Existing or proposed traffic control.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 16
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Level of Service Analysis Results
Existing Traffic Conditions
Capacity and level of service analysis was performed for ex-
isting traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic control for
the AM and PM peak hours for the nearby intersection of
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive. This analysis was
conducted with existing "Stop" sign control.
As indicated in Table 5, "Level of Service Summary — Exist-
ing Traffic Conditions," for the study intersection, all exist-
ing vehicle movements for existing traffic conditions pres-
ently operate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS `B" or
better for the AM and PM peak hours except for the west-
bound left -turn movements on Pebble Beach Drive at
Rahling Road during the AM and PM peak hour (LOS "E")
with "Stop" sign control. Also, average control delay
(seconds per vehicle) and intersection capacity utilization are
found to be acceptable for the study intersection.
Traffic volumes used for this analysis are shown on Figure 3,
"Existing Traffic Volumes."
C
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
0
x
}-
—
m
x
w
iota
M
�
x
r`
r
�
r
.�
x
r
— — 15
>r � �
w
w
��p
sa
Sri
W
W
z
z
z
0
w
H
p' m
4494%.
e
INTERSECTION
r
PEAK
HOUR
a
OF
PEAK HR
AA7
Rabling Road and Pebble Beach Ofte
"STOP'
SIGN
E
B
A
P.
A
nla
2.$
PM
E
B
A
„
I A
n1a
11 3.0 11
51.1%
Table 5 - Level of Service Summary - Existing Traffic Conditions
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS. INC.
Page 17
Projected Traffic Conditions
Capacity and LOS analysis was performed for the projected
10-year traffic conditions for AM and PM peak hours traffic
for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach
Drive. Traffic volumes used for the projected traffic condi-
tions are shown on Figure 6, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Vol-
umes." The operating conditions projected to exist at the
intersection are summarized in Table 6, "Level of Service
Summary - Projected 10-Year Traffic Conditions."
As indicated in Table 6, for the intersection of Rahling Road
and Pebble Beach Drive, the only vehicle movements with
capacity and LOS results demonstrating very long to ex-
treme traffic delays (LOS "F") for the AM and/or PM peak
hours for these projected traffic conditions is the westbound
left -turn vehicle movement on Pebble Beach Drive at
Rahling Road during the AM peak and during the PM peak
hour with "Stop" sign control with existing or proposed zon-
ing site -generated traffic volumes included. This vehicle
movement improves to an acceptable LOS "C" with traffic
signal control with existing or proposed zoning site -
generated traffic volumes included. All other vehicle move-
ments for these projected traffic conditions for the intersec-
tion studied are projected to operate at what calculates as an
acceptable LOS "C" or better for the AM and PM peak
hours. Additionally, projected average control delay
(seconds per vehicle) and intersection capacity utilization are
found to be acceptable for the study intersection.
As a part of this study, the intersection of Rahling Road and
Pebble Beach Road was also analyzed as a roundabout. All
vehicle movements for projected 10-year traffic conditions
are expected to operate at what calculates as an acceptable
LOS with the roundabout intersection concept. These analy-
sis results indicate a roundabout at this location would be an
acceptable alternative to the traffic signal control.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 18
f r , fr r_ 11';rr(f�r
Projected Trafc Conditions with the future
LaMarche Drive Connection Made to Taylor Loop hoad
Capacity and LOS analysis was performed for the projected
10-year traffic conditions for AM and PM peak hours traffic
for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
with the future LaMarche Drive connection made to Taylor
Loop Road. Traffic volumes used for the projected traffic
conditions are shown on Figure 7, "Projected 10-Year Traf-
fic Volumes with LaMarche Drive Connection." The operat-
ing conditions projected to exist at the study intersection are
summarized in Table 7, "Level of Service Summary - Pro-
jected 10-Year Traffic Conditions with the Future LaMarche
Drive Connection."
As indicated in Table 7, for the intersection of Rahling Road
and Pebble Beach Drive, the only vehicle movements with
capacity and LOS results demonstrating very long to ex-
treme traffic delays (LOS "F") for the AM and/or PM peak
hours for these projected traffic conditions is the westbound
left -turn vehicle movement on Pebble Beach Drive at
Rahling Road during the AM peak and during the PM peak
hour with "Stop" sign control. This vehicle movement im-
proves to an acceptable LOS "C" with traffic signal control.
All other vehicle movements for these projected traffic con-
ditions for the intersection studied are projected to operate at
what calculates as an acceptable LOS "C" or better for the
AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, projected average
control delay (seconds per vehicle) and intersection capacity
utilization are found to be acceptable for the study intersec-
tion.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 19
• • u
'�
cf
@
@
@
a
RS
r�
m
m
at d v
l] d
PPMPM
-STOP
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive SIGN
Nfllh E>asting Zoning SIGNAL
F
B
A
B
A
J.
4.8
46.0%
F
B
A
B
A
n/a
11-7
42.5%
C
C
A
A
A
A
6.5
46.0%
C
B
A
A
A
A
7A
57.5%
AM
"STOP"
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive SIGN
with Proposed Re -zoning
SIGNALC
F
B
A
B
A
n/A
6.7
45.8%
PM
F
B
A
B
A
n/a
23.2
46.1 %
AM
C
B
A
A
A
A
6.7
45.8%
PM
B
A
A
A
A
7.6
46.1 %
Table 6 - Level of Service Summary - Projected 10-Year Traffic Conditions
PROJECTED 10-YEAR
T
TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
ic
a
WITH LAMARCHE DRIVE CONNECTION
INTERSECTION
0
> d
PEAK HR PEAK
HOUR
- LEVEL
OF SERVICE
< N
5
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Dd%e
with Proposed Re -zoning
Table 7 - Level of Service Summary - Projected 10-Year Traffic Conditions with the Future LaMarche Drive Connection
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 20
i r- � rr �`. (ur. v
In evaluating the need for a traffic signal, certain established
warrants must be examined by a comprehensive investiga-
tion of traffic conditions and physical characteristics of the
location. The decision to install a traffic signal at a particu-
lar location must be evaluated quantitatively relative to these
warrants. These warrants, as specified in the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), are described
in detail in the appendix of this report. They are summarized
as follows:
♦ Warrant One: Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume
♦ Warrant Two: Four -Hour Vehicular Volume
♦ Warrant Three: Peak Hour
♦ Warrant Four: Pedestrian Volume
♦ Warrant Five: School Crossing
♦ Warrant Six: Coordinated Signal System
♦ Warrant Seven: Crash Experience
♦ Warrant Eight: Roadway Network
Traffic signal warrants analysis was made for the intersec-
tion of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive for existing
traffic volumes and for projected 10-year traffic volumes
(with and without the future LaMarche Drive connection
made to Taylor Loop Road).
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 21
Existing Ti•afc Conditions
Based on volume criteria set out in the MUTCD, it was
found that traffic signal warrants are currently met for the
intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive with
existing traffic volumes. Volumes are currently sufficient at
this intersection to satisfy Warrants 1, 2 and 3. The traffic
signal warrants analysis results for this intersection are sum-
marized in Table 8, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results -
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive - Existing Traffic
Conditions."
PM ected Tra rc Conditions
Based on volume criteria set out in the MUTCD, it was
found that traffic signal warrants are projected to continue to
be met for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble
Beach Drive for projected 10-year traffic conditions (with
and without the future LaMarche Drive connection made to
Taylor Loop Road) with existing or proposed zoning site -
generated traffic volumes included. Volumes are projected
to be sufficient at this intersection to continue to satisfy War-
rants 1, 2 and 3. The traffic signal warrants analysis results
for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
are summarized in Table 9, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results
- Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive - Projected Traffic
Conditions with Existing Zoning," and Table 10, "Traffic
Signal Warrants Results - Rahling Road and Pebble Beach
Drive - Projected Traffic Conditions with Proposed Re -
Zoning," Table 11, "Traffic Signal Warrants Results -
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive - Projected Traffic
Conditions with the future LaMarche Drive Connection."
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 22
FINAL RESULTS: Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis
Hour warrant was met:
Major St.:
Rahling Road
Minor St.:
Pebble Beach Drive
VOLUME
COMB.
4 Hr.
Peak
Existing Conditions
420
630
336
504
105
52
84
41
SUM
MAX.
HOUR
MAJOR
MINOR
1A
1B
1AB
2
3
7:00
1288
45
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
8:00
1006
72
0
1
0 0
1'
1
0
9:00
593
58
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
10:00
535
52
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
11:00
748
54
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Table S
12:00
773
61
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Traffic Signal Warrants Results
13:00
636
64
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
Existing Traffic Conditions.
14:00
15:00
16:00
768
915
973
54
109
67
0
1
0
1
1
1
0 0
1 1
0 0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
17:00
1124
102
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
18:00
878
109
1
1
1 1
1
1
0
19:00
800
82
0
1
0 0
1
1
0
20:00
563
39
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
21:00
318
33
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
2 1D 3 6 T
This intersection SATISFIES the warrants for signalization
as outlined In the W.U.T.C.D."
FINAL RESULTS:
Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis
Hour warrant was met:
Mapr St.: Rahling Road
'Minor St.: Pebble Beach Drive
VOLUME
COMB.
4 Hr.
Peak
10-Year Prol. Cond.
420
630
336
504
wl Exist Zoning
105
52
84
41
SUM
MAX.
HOUR MAJOR
MINOR
1A
is
1AB
2
3
7:00 1738 55 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
8:00 1325
85
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
Table 9
9:00 798 67 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
10:00 708
59
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Traffic Signal Warrants Results
11:00 994
61
0
1
0 0
1
1
0
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
12:00 1021
13:00 854
70
73
0
0
1
1
0 0
0 0
1
1
1
1
0
0
Projected Traffic Conditions
14:00 1031
63
0
1
0 0
1
1
0
With Existing Zoning
15:00 1214
120
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
16:00 1305 79 0 1 0 0 1 1 1
17:00 1502
116
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
18:00 1187
123
1
19:00 1059
92
0
20:00 752
47
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
21:00 437
39
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
3 13 5 10 6
s intersection SATISFIES thr v4rrarrts far srgnel attar
outlined in the "M.U.T.C.D."
j� PETERS 8 ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS, INC
Page 23
C-Tzrdr r
FINAL RESULTS: Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis
Hour warrant was met:
Major St.:
Rahling Road
Minor St.:
Pebble Beach Drive
VOLUME
COMB,
4 Hr.
10-Year Projected
420
630
336
504
Conditions
w/ Re -Zone
105
52
84
41
SUM
MAX.
HOUR
MAJOR
MINOR
1A
1B
1AB
2
7:00
1912
92
0
1
1
1
1
1
8:00
1370
87
0
1
1
1
1
1
9:00
862
73
0
1
0
0
1
1
Table 10 1
10:00
847
71
0
1
0
0
1
1
Traffic Signal Warrants Results
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
Projected Traffic Conditions with
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
1232
1246
1124
1288
95
94
106
96
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Proposed Re -Zoning.
15:00
1462
147
1
1
1
1
1
1
16:00
1534
108
1
1
1
1
1
1
17:00
1733
151
1
1
1
1
1
1
18:00
1451
152
1
1
1
1
1
1
19:00
1322
121
1
1
1
1
1
1
20:00
999
73
0
1
0
0
1
1
21:00
586
46
0
0
0
0
1
0
6 14 11 14
This intersection SATISFIES the warrants for signalization
as outlined in the "M.U.T.C.D."
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
if
FINAL RESULTS:
Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis
Hour warrant was met:
Major St.: Rahling Road
Minor St.: Pebble Beach Drive
VOLUME
COMB.
4 Hr.
Peak
10-Year Proj. Cond.
420
630
336
504
w/ LaMarche Conn.
105
52
84
41
SUM
MAX.
HOUR MAJOR
MINOR
1A
1B
1AB
2
3
7:00 1612 92 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
8:00 1165
87
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
9:00 728
73
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Table 11
10:00 736
71
0
1
0 0
1
0
0
Traffic Signal Warrants Results
11:00 1075
95
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
12:00 1088
94
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive
13:00 982
106
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Projected Traffic Conditions with the future
14:00 1118
96
0
1
1 1
1
1
1
LaMarche Drive Connection.
15:00 1271
147
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
16:00 1319
108
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
17:00 1489
151
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
18:00 1247
152
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
19:00 1154
121
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
20:00 877
73
0
1
0 0
1
1
0
21:00 507
46
0
0
0 0
1
0
0
6 14 11 12 11
This intersection SATISFIES the warrants for signalization
as outlined in the "M.U.T.C.D."
r'erses x nssuCIATE:
47VI ENGINEERS, INC.
Page 24
r r-�T ram'
i r'r.�i�fr n►�f� •�r
There is expected to be only approximately 15 percent higher
10-year projected traffic volumes on Rahling Road with pro-
posed re -zoning land -uses than with the existing zoning.
If the Beckenham Drive Connection (to the eastern portion in the
Hillsborough subdivision) to Rahling Road is constructed, there
is expected to be approximately six percent less traffic on
Rahling Road than if it not constructed. This assumes the La-
Marche Drive Connection to be constructed and with the pro-
posed zoning.
Analysis of projected 10-year conditions (with and without the
future LaMarche Drive connection made to Taylor Loop Road
assumed) has not included the possible future connection of
Beckenham Drive. If a connection of Beckenham Drive is made
in the future, this would provide alternate routes for traffic vol-
umes from the east, likely causing a reduction in traffic volumes
on Pebble Beach Drive. Additionally, projected 10-year 24-hour
volumes have also been estimated with the LaMarche Drive con-
nection made to Taylor Loop Road and with Beckenham Drive
Connection (to the eastern portion in the Hillsborough subdivi-
sion, depicted on Figure 8, "Projected 10-Year Traffic Volumes
with LaMarche Drive Connection and Beckenham Drive Con-
nection."
Traffic signal warrants are met for existing and projected traffic
conditions for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble
Beach Drive. Alternately, consideration of a roundabout could
be given at the T-intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach
Drive.
Rahling Road is planned to be constructed as a four -lane median
divided roadway with limited access. These types of roadway
are capable of adequately handle more than the City of Little
Rock minor arterial typical service volume of 18,000 vehicles
per day. Additionally, there are existing minor arterials within
the City that are already at or above the 18,000 vehicles per day
service volume (without a median) at the following locations
(with 2011 ADT shown):
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 25
C e. f r rrr. 5r
Bowman Road, Just North of Markham Street (19,000
ADT)
Shackleford Road, at Markham Street (20,000 ADT)
• Hinson Road, just east of Napa Valley Road (18,000
ADT).
The City of Little Rock's typical service volume of 18,000
vehicles per day does not take into account a median divided
roadway with access control measures including limiting
median breaks and access drives enabling the service volume
to be well above 18,000 vehicles per day. Similar roadway
service volumes were researched as a part of this study for
median divided four -lane roadways. The Florida Department
of Transportation 2009 Quality and Level of Service Hand-
book is an excellent resource and has general service vol-
umes for different roadway types. This handbook states that
a median divided four -lane can accommodate up to 27,000
vehicles per day (with 2 to 4.5 signalized intersections per
mile) and continue to operate at LOS "D" or better. A copy
of the Generalized Service Volumes Table from the Florida
Department of Transportation 2009 Quality and Level of
Service Handbook is included in the Appendix of this report.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC
Page 26
Findings of this study are summarized as follows:
• For existing zoned land -uses of the study tracts, approximately
3,179 vehicle trips (combined in and out) per average weekday
are projected to be generated by the land uses. Of this total, ap-
proximately 246 vehicle trips are estimated during the traffic
conditions of the AM peak hour, approximately 305 vehicle
trips are estimated during the traffic conditions of the PM peak
hour.
■ For proposed re -zoned land -uses of the study tracts, approxi-
mately 10,062 vehicle trips (combined in and out) per average
weekday are projected to be generated by the proposed land
uses. Of this total, approximately 313 vehicle trips are esti-
mated during the traffic conditions of the AM peak hour, ap-
proximately 750 vehicle trips are estimated during the traffic
conditions of the PM peak hour.
• Capacity and level of service analysis was performed for exist-
ing traffic volumes, lane geometry and traffic control for the
AM and PM peak hours for the nearby intersection of Rahling
Road and Pebble Beach Drive. This analysis was conducted
with existing "Stop" sign control and with possible traffic sig-
nal control and roundabout. For this intersection, all existing
vehicle movements for existing traffic conditions presently op-
erate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS `B" or better for
the AM and PM peak hours except for the westbound left -turn
movements on Pebble Beach Drive at Rahling Road during the
AM and PM peak hour (LOS "E") with "Stop" sign control.
• Capacity and LOS analysis was performed for the projected 10-
year traffic conditions for AM and PM peak hours traffic for the
intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive (with and
without the future LaMarche Drive connection made to Taylor
Loop Road). For the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble
Beach Drive, the only vehicle movements with capacity and
LOS results demonstrating very long to extreme traffic delays
(LOS "F") for the AM and/or PM peak hours for these pro-
jected traffic conditions is the westbound left -turn vehicle
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC. Page 27
i
movement on Pebble Beach Drive at Rahling Road during
the AM peak and during the PM peak hour with "Stop" sign
control with existing or proposed zoning site -generated traf-
fic volumes included. This vehicle movement improves to
an acceptable LOS "C" with traffic signal control with exist-
ing or proposed zoning site -generated traffic volumes in-
cluded. All other vehicle movements for these projected
traffic conditions for the intersection studied are projected to
operate at what calculates as an acceptable LOS "C" or bet-
ter for the AM and PM peak hours. Additionally, projected
average control delay (seconds per vehicle) and intersection
capacity utilization are found to be acceptable for the study
intersection. As a part of this study, the intersection of
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road was also analyzed as
a roundabout. All vehicle movements for projected 10-year
traffic conditions are expected to operate at what calculates
as an acceptable LOS `B" or better with the roundabout in-
tersection concept. These analysis results indicate a round-
about at this location would be an acceptable alternative to
the traffic signal control.
Based on volume criteria set out in the MUTCD, it was
found that traffic signal warrants are currently met for the
intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Drive with
existing traffic volumes.
• Based on volume criteria set out in the MUTCD, it was
found that traffic signal warrants are projected to continue to
be met for the intersection of Rahling Road and Pebble
Beach Drive for projected 10-year traffic conditions (with
and without the future LaMarche Drive connection made to
Taylor Loop Road). Alternately, consideration of a round-
about could be given at the T-intersection of Rahling Road
and Pebble Beach Drive.
■ There is expected to be only approximately 15 percent
higher 10-year projected traffic volumes on Rahling Road
with proposed re -zoning land -uses than with the existing
zoning.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC. Page 28
+ Analysis of projected 10-year conditions (with and with-
out the future LaMarche Drive connection made to Tay-
lor Loop Road assumed) has not included the possible
future connection of Beckenham Drive. If this connec-
tion is made in the future, this would provide alternate
routes for traffic volumes from the east, causing a likely
reduction in traffic volumes on Pebble Beach Drive.
• If the Beckenham Drive Connection (to the eastern por-
tion in the Hillsborough subdivision) to Rahling Road is
constructed, there is expected to be approximately six
percent less traffic on Rahling Road than if it not con-
structed. This assumes the LaMarche Drive Connection
to be constructed and with the proposed zoning.
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS. INC. Page 29
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
PROJECT No. P1378-A
DATE: 10-22-2012
+"iPETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGRUMR9, INC.
24-HR VOLUMES
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
RAHLING ROAD
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE No
3
% o
PEBBLE BEACH DR' 10%
R-2
to
OS
1.57 Ac
R-2
to
0-3
13.70 AC
A
r
z
G7
R-2
to
C-1
13.21 AC
M to B Ift—',
C-1
2.12 AC
I
1
1
i
MF-18
to i R-2
to
C-1 i
9.96 AC i MF-
12
11.96 AC
f'
f
r UMrrS OF IXISnNG
MF-18 ZONING
r
dF-18 � r
to
MF-12
MF-18 8.28 AOr
R-2 • to r
to ` OS r
OS �ti 5.46 AC
�!° yu 1.35 AC` ,t M-8
to
+ R-2
1 1.53 AC i
R-2
to
OS
0 04 AC
DATE:10 z20 z78-A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT UIFtEC'I'IONALDII T TRAFFIC
PETERS & ASSOCIATES SITE TRAFFIC
ENGWEM, INC. RAHLING ROAD
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS FiGURE
4 No
4
{�
24—HR VOLUMES
503
Ra hling Road and PQWC enncn arI Va
503
.
BEACH DR.
pEBgLE
u
u 19 (31)
R-2
to
OS
�n v
r v
o c�
U7
41
•
PEAT{ HOURS KEY
?
R-2
xxx = AM Peak Hour
'n
to
u) LO
0-3
(xxx) = PM Peak Hour
� N
13.�o AC
r N
r
z
G7
X
R-2
to
C-1
13.21 AC
M ev18
i12 AC
l
i
i
r
MF-18 t
R-2
to r
to
C-1
MF-12
9.96 AC
1
f
j
11.96 AC
J
J
JMITS OF D(ISnNG
j
MF-18 ZONING
i
F-18
to
MF-12 !�
MF-18
J
8.28 AD
R-2 t.
to
to %
OS
i
()$
5.46 AC
f•�
1 35 AC 1
j
�.`
M
to18
R-2
7 1.53 AC
+_ �!
R-2
to
OS
0.04 AC
PROJECT No. P12378-A
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED RE -ZONING
20
SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PETERS &ASSOCIATES
RAHLING ROAD
ENGWEERS, INC.
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
FICURE No
_12
5
PEAK HOURS KEY
x ,t
1
xxx = AM Peak Hour
(xxx) = PM Peak Hour
Ra Idi ng Rob asid Pe We JE nve
0 0
u
PEAK HOURS 11 91 (14)
WITH
PROPOSED ZONING u 88 (134)
0
O) N
� r
fp N
m
W
u
24—HR VOLUMES
WITH
PROPOSED ZONING
. 2318
2172 .
LU
Z) O
C3
oo
rn
444,
1n
'-
a I
N CL
.
R-2
to
0S
1.57 AC
1n
Z
PEAK HOURS 91 (14)
j Z
.
WITH
=O
EXISTING u 74 (122)
j3N
❑
o o
R-2
= Z
I, LO
M °'
to
C-1
V)
N
.
13.21 AC
o M
o m
I� N
W
NOTE: Volumes shown on this
figure include existing traffic
plus 10—year background
growth plus site generated
traffic volumes.
NOTE: Site generated traffic
volumes have been adjusted
to reflect Pass —By for
commerial retail uses.
MF-18
F2 +.
to
to ',
0S
0S 1
545 AC
1.35 AC l
'%
MF-18
to
R-2
1.53 AC
f�
'a
PROJECT No. P1378-A
DATE: 10-22-2012
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
]VT ENGDZM, INC.
S0
G• 1
-2 AC !
24—HR VOLUMES
WITH
EXISTING ZONING
. 1975
1829 `
LE BEACH)
r
t
YB,.,
i R-2
to
MF-12
11.96 AC
I
i
r
i�
to i
MF-12r
628 AV
i�
R-2
to
0S
0.04 AC
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
RAHLING ROAD
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
R-2
to
0-3
13.70 AC
LIMITS OF DUSTING
MF-18 ZONING
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE No
6
•�
24-HR VOLUMES 24-HR VOLUMES
WITH
o Rohl Ing Road and PeeWBve a Reach aA
WITz PROPOSED ZONING EXISTING ZONING
2171
1828
W $
2027
1684 .
u
BEACH 1)R'
91
(14)
PEBBLE
u 75
(134)
4 =>
R-2
o $
to
m N
as
r f`
N N
1 b7 AC
PEAK HOURS KEY
xxx = AM Peak Hour
N z
w
z
(xxx) = PM Peak Hour
=)0
R-2
_JXN
C,
to
N f�
0-3
13.70 AC
x 0 rn X
IL
� O ■
N 4 �*
V)
Li 0
M z
O _H O
> N
3
Z
O N R-2
CN 0 to
=
n C-1
N
. 13.21 AC
IX
NOTE: Volumes shown on this
figure include existing traffic
plus 10-year background
growth plus site generated
traffic volumes,to
C-1
Z32 AC
i
i
NOTE: Site generated traffic
volumes have been adjusted
to reflect Pass -By for
commerial retail uses.
MF-18 `
i
R-2
to i
to
C-1 i
MF-12
e.95 AC
s
11.96 AC
i
i
i
r
i
OMITS OF E ISnNG
�
MF-18 ZONING
r�
to !
MF-12/
hl F-1$
8.2e w'
to
i
a
to
OS +�
OS
sus AC
i r
1.35 AC +
/•i
MF-18
►'
to !
f
+ R-2 /
1.53 AC r'
+ / r
R-2
+./
to
ne
0
PROJECT No. P1378-A
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTED 10-YEAR
DATE: 10-22-2012
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
RAHLING ROAD
WITH LA MARCHE DRIVE CONNECTION
I ENGINEERS, INC.
f I
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
FIG1RENo
7
24-HR VOLUMES
WITH
PROPOSED ZONING
® 1700
1557
PEBBLE BEACH
R-2
to
OS
1,6'r W,
w ?
O
■
j
R-2
oX
oTH
0
0 3
24-HR VOLUMES
=�o
rn
1&70Ac
PROPO ED ZONING
N a ■ n
2640 .
NOTE: Volumes shown on this
figure include existing traffic
Z
plus 10-year background
growth plus site generated
X
traffic volumes.
❑
R-2
to
C-1
13.21 AC
vntNKA DR.
H1VECTf H
AN M W ! M
NOTE: Vol um s shown on this
figure includ Beckenham
M -Ii
Drive Conn' tion to extend to
C-1
the eastern portion of the
21i
i
/� existing Bea enhom Drive in
, ` the Hillsbor uoh subdivision.
MF-18
i
R-2
to
i
to
C-1
i
MF-12
9.96 AC
-
11.96 AC
f,I
f
LIMITS OF EXISTING
i
i
MF-16 ZONING
i
F-18
to i
MF-12
MF-18
asa 4v
R_2 +,
to
i
to '
4'+
CIS
OS
5.46 AC
1.35, AC •
r'
• MF-18 +'
to i
R-2 •'
'+
1.53 AC •'
+ f
R-2
i
+.:
to
CIS
0.04 AC
PROJECT No. P1378-A
DATE: 10-22-2012
(� PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
RAHLING ROAD
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
iGJECTED 10-YEAH IHAF--IC; V()LUNItS'
WITH LA MARCHE DRIVE CONNECTION
AND BECKENHAM DRIVE CONNECTION
FIGURE No
8
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
rm
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Exist,
P eed
11 Open Space
0.0 AC
8.42 AC
O R-2
10B.66 AC
67.07 AC
O MF-12
0.0 AC
20.24 AC
MF-18
27.34 AC
0.00 AC
0-3
0.0 AC
13.70 AC
t:1 C-1
0.0 AC
24.57 AC
I
116�m
Rt 2MF-12
11.N x
!74e
r
MF-18 /
to /
vF-12 /
/ r —
1.111 ,
�il I i
tvv ��-
FE-2
la
os
om K
I ' �
I
I
I
r
I
— — J
UMOS OF FA5 W
MF-18 ZONNG
AW
u
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Little Rock, Arkansas
Mixed -Use Development
P1378 A
•
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROX. ITE
VEHICLE TRIPS
VEHICLE TRIP2
SIZE CODE
ENTER EXIT
ENTER EXIT
Residential Single -Family (R-2) (41.83 Acres) 82 Lots 21.0
785
16 46
52 30
Residential Multi -Family (MF-18) (20 Acres) 360 Units 2.20
2,394
36 148
144 79
3,179
52 194
196 109
TOTALS:
TOTAL ENTERING + EXITING
246
PROPOSED Z•
TWO-WAYAM
PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK
HOUR
APPROX.
ITE
WE•
VEHICLE TRIPS
VEHICLE
TRIPS
ENTER
EXIT
SIZE CODE
VEH.TRIPS
ENTER
EXIT
Office Tract (13.7 Acres)
120,000
710
1,321
163
23
30
149
Commercial Tracts (13.21 Acres, 2.12 Acres and 9.96 Acres)
165,000 Sq. Ft.
814
7,096
0
0
184
234
Residential Multi -Family (MF-12) (8.28 Acres and 11.96 Acres))
243 Units
220
1,616
24
100
97
53
Open Space (1.57 Acres, 5.46 Acres and 1.35 Acres)
1.38 Acres
n/a
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS:
10,033
187
123
311
436
TOTAL ENTERING + EXITING
310
P1578-A - EXISTING LAND -USES
Summary of Multi -Use Trip Generation
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes
October 12, 2012
Land Use
Size
24 Hour
Two -Way
Volume
AM Pk
Enter
Hour
Exit
PM Pk
Enter
Hour
Exit
Single Family Detached Housing
82 Dwelling
Units 785
16
46
52
30
Apartments
360 Dwelling
Units 2394
36
148
144
79
Total Driveway Volume
3179
52
194
196
109
Total Peak Hour
Pass -By Trips
0
0
0
0
Total Peak Hour
Vol. Added to Adjacent Streets
52
194
196
109
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
P1378-A - PROPOSED LAND -USES
Summary of Multi -Use Trip Generation
Average Weekday Driveway Volumes
October 22, 2012
24 Hour
AM Pk
Hour
PM Pk
Hour
Two -Way
Land Use
Size
Volume
Enter
Exit
Enter
Exit
General Office Building
120.0
Th.Sq.Ft.
GFA 1321
163
23
30
149
Specialty Retail Center
165.0
Th.Sq.Ft.
GLA 7096
0
0
184
234
Apartments 243
Dwelling
Units 1616
24
100
97
53
Single Family Detached
Housing
3
Dwelling
Units 29
1
2
2
1
Total Driveway Volume
10062
188
125
313
437
Total Peak Hour Pass -By
Trips
0
0
0
0
Total Peak Hour Vol. Added to Adjacent Streets
188
125
313
437
Note: A zero indicates no data available.
TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS
w
Fmo
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : AM-PB
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road Site Code : 00000000
Little Rock, AR Start Date : 08/28/2012
P-1378-A Page No : 1
Groups Printed- PM Co
Rahling Rd.
Pebble Beac
From North
From Ea
Start Time
Thru
Left
I App.
Total
Right
Left
Factor
1.01
1.01
1.0
1.0
12
10
07:00 AM 92 5 97
07:15 AM
131
4
135
32
10
07:30 AM
149
15
164
17
11
07:45 AM
198
12
210
14
14
75
45
Total 570 36 606
08:00 AM
168
8
176
8
19
08:15 AM
132
6
138
12
22
08:30 AM
135
4
139
3
16
08:45 AM
128
5
133
4
15
Total
563
23
586
27
72
Grand Total
1133
59
11921
102
117
Apprch %
95.1
4.9
46.6
53.4
Total %
45.1
2.3
47.4
4.1
4.7
ata
Rahling Rd.
From South
. Total I Right Thru App. Total Int. Total
1.0 1.0
22 18 82 100 219
42 29 172 201 378
28 85 131 216 408
28 55 110 165 403
120 187 495 6821 1408
27 37 78 115 318
34 18 86 104 276
19 10 91 101 259
19 12 88 100 252
99 77 3a3 420 1105
219 264 838 1102I 2513
24.0 76.0 Il
8.7 . 10.5 33.3 43.9
Rahling ft
Out to Total
® 1i92 2132
1133 58
1 L+
T
North
W� �
ro
rr
�1281270:OQ AM
01812280:00 AM
3N
rom
00
Count Data
� a
-
WEO
Thru Right
264
1250 102 2352
Out 1n Total
Rahli R+i.
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
AM Hour Turning Movement Count Data
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road
Little Rock, AR
P-1378-A
Rahling Rd.
From North
Start Time j
Thru I
Left j _
Peak Hour From 07:00
AM to 08:45 AM - Peak
Intersection
07:15 AM
Volume
646
39
Percent
94.3
5.7
07:30 Volume
149
15
Peak Factor
High Int.
07:45 AM
Volume
198
12
Peak Factor
Pebble Beach Rd.
From East
685
71
54
125
206
56.8
43.2
29.6
164
17
11
28
85
07:15 AM
07:30 AM
210
32
10
42
85
0.815
0.744
File Name
: AM-PB
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 08/28/2012
Page No
: 2
Rahling Rd.
From South
Thru I App. Total 1 Int. Total
491
6971
1507
70.4
131
216 408
0.923
131
216
0.807
a ng .
Out In Total
562 685 1247
846 39
Thru Left
1 �►
T
5-0
North
Nm
a
m
�1812012 7:15:00 AM
N a
128f201.2 8:00:00 AM
u+on
PM Count Gala
a� a
0
�m
o—
T
Rfl ht
491 206
700 69 1397
Out In Total
f3ahlin Rd.
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : PM-PB
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road Site Code : 00000000
Little Rock, AR Start Date : 08/29/2012
P-1378-A Page No : 1
Groups Printed- PM Count Data
Rahling Rd. Pebble Beach Rd. Rahling Rd.
From North From East From South
StartTime Thru Left I Ap Total Right Left A . Total Right ThruT App. Total lnt. Total
Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0
04:00 PM 82 7 89 2 12 14 21 101 122 225
04:15 PM 89 6 95 2 10 12 20 118 138 245
04:30 PM 94 6 100 2 17 19 35 123 158 277
04:45 PM 96 9 105 3 28 31 33 133 166 302
Total 361 28 389 9. 67 76 109 475 584 1649
05:00 PM 105 6 111 2 14 16 31 180 211 1 338
05:15 PM 153 6 159 4 21 25 37 167 204 388
05:30 PM 78 9 87 6 36 42 22 113 135 264
05:45 PM 86 9 95 5 31 36 24 98 1221 253
Total 422 30 452 17 1 ij2 119 114 558 6721 1243
Grand Total 783 58 841 I 26 169 195 I 223 1033 1256 I 2292
Apprch % 93.1 6.9 13.3 86.7 !I 17.8 82.2
Total % 34.2 2.5 36.7 1.1 7.4 8.5 9.7 45.1 54.8
Rahling Rd.
Out In Total
1058 &l1 7900
783 58
Lest
L+
i
O
go 5�
North
Q
� N
�
2912012 4:00:00 PM
�. C,
2012 5:45:00 PM
s
PM Count Data
P-
o'
v E1
m—
TTu Right
1033 223
952 1258 2208
Out n Total
Rahlin Rd.
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
Peak Hours Turning Movement Count Data
PM Hour Turning Movement Count Data File Name : PM-PB
Rahling Road and Pebble Beach Road Site Code : 00000000
Little Rock, AR Start Date : 08/29/2012
P-1378-A Page No : 2
Rahling Rd.
From North
Pebble Beach Rd.
I From East
I
Rahling Rd.
From South
Start Time I
Thru I
Left I App.
Total
I Right 1.
Left App.
Total
Right I
Thru I A
Total I Int. Total
)ur From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
_
Intersection
04:30 PM
Volume
448
27
475
11
80
91
136
603
739
1305
Percent
94.3
5.7
12.1
87.9
18.4
81.6
05:15 Volume
153
6
159
4
21
25
37
167
204
388
Peak Factor
0.841
High Int.
05:15 PM
04:45 PM
05:00 PM
Volume
153
6
159
3
28
31
31
180
211
Peak Factor
0.747
0.734
0.876
Rahling Rd,
Out In Total
614 475 1 1089
448 27
Thru LeR
1 L►
T
North
/29/2012 4:3 : OP 3 T1
3/2912012 5:15:00 PM �W
x
PM Count Data �o p
�d
A
Thru REF+
W3 136
528 739 F 1-26-71
Out to Total
Rahli Rd
PETERS & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS, INC.
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Timing Plan: AM
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 9/17/2012
t
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
►j
?f
T
+
Sign Control
Stop
Free
Free
Grade
0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h)
54
71
491
206
39
646
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)
59
77
534
224
42
702
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1433
646
758
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1433
646
758
tC, single (s)
6.4
6.2
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
58
84
95
cM capacity (veh/h)
140
472
854
Direction, Lane #
WB 1
WB 2
NB 1
SB 1
SB 2
Volume Total
59
77
758
42
702
Volume Left
59
0
0
42
0
Volume Right
0
77
224
0
0
cSH
140
472
1700
854
1700
Volume to Capacity
0.42
0.16
0.45
0.05
0.41
Queue Length 95th (ft)
46
14
0
4
0
Control Delay (s)
47.9
14.1
0.0
9.4
0.0
Lane LOS
E
B
A
Approach Delay (s)
28.7
0.0
0.5
Approach LOS
D
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
2.6
Intersection Capacity Utilization
49.4%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
P1378A Rahling Page 1
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Existing AM
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Timing Plan: PM
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling
Road
9/17/2012
4--
t
II
t
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
r
T
+
Sign Control
Stop
Free
Free
Grade
0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h)
80
11
603
136
27
448
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)
87
12
655
148
29
487
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1275
729
803
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1275
729
803
tC, single (s)
6.4
6.2
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
51
97
96
cM capacity (veh/h)
178
423
821
Direction, Lane #
WB 1
WB 2
NB 1
SB 1
SB 2
Volume Total
87
12
803
29
487
Volume Left
87
0
0
29
0
Volume Right
0
12
148
0
0
cSH
178
423
1700
821
1700
Volume to Capacity
0.49
0.03
0.47
0.04
0.29
Queue Length 95th (ft)
59
2
0
3
0
Control Delay (s)
43.3
13.8
0.0
9.5
0.0
Lane LOS
E
B
A
Approach Delay (s)
39.7
0.0
0.5
Approach LOS
E
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
3.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
51.1%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
P1378A Rahling Page 1
Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc. Existing PM
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Page 1
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling
Road
11/16/2012
f
4--
t
II
t
Movement WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
r
0
1
tt
Sign Control Stop
Free
Free
Grade 0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h) 74
91
706
283
50
848
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 80
99
767
308
54
922
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1491
538
1075
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1491
538
1075
tC, single (s)
6.8
6.9
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
23
80
92
cM capacity (veh/h)
105
488
644
Direction, Lane #
WB 1
WB 2 NB 1 NB 2
SB 1 SB 2 SB 3
Volume Total
80
99
512
563
54
461
461
Volume Left
80
0
0
0
54
0
0
Volume Right
0
99
0
308
0
0
0
cSH
105
488
1700
1700
644
1700
1700
Volume to Capacity
0.77
0.20
0.30
0.33
0.08
0.27
0.27
Queue Length 95th (ft)
104
19
0
0
7
0
0
Control Delay (s)
108.0
14.2
0.0
0.0
11.1
0.0
0.0
Lane LOS
F
B
B
Approach Delay (s)
56.3
0.0
0.6
Approach LOS
F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
4.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization
46.0%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
Projected AMEX ZONING Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
Queues
Pagel
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling
Road
11/16/2012
4�-
*
I
I
t
Lane Group
WBL
WBR
NBT
SBL
SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)
80
99
1075
54
922
v/c Ratio
0.27
0.29
0.51
0.16
0.38
Control Delay
14.7
6.2
8.0
5.3
4.4
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
14.7
6.2
8.0
5.3
4.4
Queue Length 50th (ft)
12
0
42
3
40
Queue Length 95th (ft)
40
25
#161
13
81
Internal Link Dist (ft)
1115
490
1244
Turn Bay Length (ft)
150
150
Base Capacity (vph)
517
533
2089
343
2450
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.15
0.19
0.51
0.16
0.38
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Projected EX ZONING AM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 11/16/2012
t
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
If
0
++
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
Frt
1.00
0.85
0.96
1.00
1.00
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1583
3387
1770
3539
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.19
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
1770
1583
3387
355
3539
Volume (vph)
74
91
706
283
50
848
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
80
99
767
308
54
922
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
84
55
0
0
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
80
15
1020
0
54
922
Turn Type
Perm
pm+pt
Protected Phases
8
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
8
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
8.7
8.7
33.0
39.2
39.2
Effective Green, g (s)
8.7
8.7
33.0
39.2
39.2
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.16
0.16
0.59
0.70
0.70
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 275
246
1999
305 2482
v/s Ratio Prot c0.05
c0.30
0.01 c0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
0.01
0.12
v/c Ratio 0.29
0.06
0.51
0.18 0.37
Uniform Delay, d1 20.9
20.1
6.7
3.7 3.4
Progression Factor 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 0.6
0.1
0.2
0.3 0.1
Delay (s) 21.5
20.2
6.9
4.0 3.5
Level of Service C
C
A
A A
Approach Delay (s) 20.8
6.9
3.5
Approach LOS C
A
A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
6.5
HCM Level of Service A
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.47
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.9
Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
46.0%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Projected EX ZONING AM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Page 1
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling
Road
11/16/2012
Ir
*--
t
II
t
Movement WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations ►j
r
+I
tt
Sign Control Stop
Free
Free
Grade 0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h) 122
14
805
185
35
633
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 133
15
875
201
38
688
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1396
538
1076
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1396
538
1076
tC, single (s)
6.8
6.9
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
0
97
94
cM capacity (veh/h)
124
488
644
Direction. Lane #
WB 1
WB 2 NB 1
NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3
Volume Total
133
15
583
493
38
344
344
Volume Left
133
0
0
0
38
0
0
Volume Right
'0
15
0
201
0
0
0
cSH
124
488
1700
1700
644
1700
1700
Volume to Capacity
1.07
0.03
0.34
0.29
6.06
0.20
0.20
Queue Length 95th (ft)
190
2
0
0
5
0
0
Control Delay (s)
167.6
12.6
0.0
0.0
10.9
0.0
0.0
Lane LOS
F
B
B
Approach Delay (s)
151.6
0.0
0.6
Approach LOS
F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
11.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization
42.5%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
Projected PM EX ZONING Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
Queues Pagel
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 11/16/2012
' t 110. 4
Lane Group WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)
133
15
1076
38
688
v/c Ratio
0.41
0.05
0.51
0.11
0.29
Control Delay
15.9
7.4
9.7
5.4
4.4
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
15.9
7.4
9.7
5.4
4.4
Queue Length 50th (ft)
23
0
52
3
31
Queue Length 95th (ft)
59
10
#215
12
66
Internal Link Dist (ft)
1115
490
1244
Turn Bay Length (ft)
150
150
Base Capacity (vph)
502
461
2092
336
2416
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.26
0.03
0.51
0.11
0.28
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Projected EX ZONING PM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 11/16/2012
'r t v.
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
r
0
++
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900 1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
Frt
1.00
0.85
0.97
1.00
1.00
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1583
3440
1770
3539
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.19
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
1770
1583
3440
351
3539
Volume (vph)
Peak -hour factor, PHF
Adj. Flow (vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
122
0.92
133
0
133
14
0.92
15
12
3
805
0.92
875
26
1050
185
0.92
201
0
0
35
0.92
38
0
38
633
0.92
688
0
688
Turn Type
Perm
pm+pt
Protected Phases
8
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
8
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
9.8
9.8
33.6
39.7
39.7
Effective Green, g (s)
9.8
9.8
33.6
39.7
39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.17
0.17
0.58
0.69
0.69
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
302
270
2010
294
2443
v/s Ratio Prot
c0.08
c0.31
0.00
c0.19
v/s Ratio Perm
0.00
0.08
v/c Ratio
0.44
0.01
0.52
0.13
0.28
Uniform Delay, d1
21.4
19.8
7.2
3.9
3.4
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
1.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
Delay (s)
22.4
19.8
7.4
4.1
3.5
Level of Service
C
B
A
A
A
Approach Delay (s)
22.2
7.4
3.5
Approach LOS
C
A
A
Intersection Summa
HCM Average Control Delay
7.1 HCM Level of Service A
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.50
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
57.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
42.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Projected EX ZONING PM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
Page 1
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling
Road
10/22/2012
'r
t
I
#
Movement WBL
WBR
NST
NBR
S8L
SBT
Lane Configurations
r
+114,
�j
++
Sign Control Stop
Free
Free
Grade 0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h) 88
91
679
276
50
902
Peak Hour Factor 0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 96
99
738
300
54
980
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1487
519
1 038
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1487
519
1038
tC, single (s)
6.8
6.9
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
9
80
92
cM capacity (veh/h)
106
502
665
Direction, Lane #
WB 1
WB 2 N8 1
N8 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3
VOIUrne Total
96
99
492
546
54
490
490
Volume Left
96
0
0
0
54
0
0
Volume Right
0
99
0
300
0
0
0
cSH
106
502
1700
1700
665
1700
1700
Volume to Capacity
0.91
0.20
0.29
0.32
0.08
0.29
0.29
Queue Length 95th (ft)
135
18
0
0
7
0
0
Control Delay (s)
137.5
13.9
0.0
0.0
10.9
0.0
0.0
Lane LOS
F
B
B
Approach Delay (s)
74.7
0.0
0.6
Approach LOS
F
Intersection Summary
Average Delay
6.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization
45.8%
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
Projected AM Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
Queues Pagel
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 10/22/2012
fe *-- t
Lane Groun WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph)
96
99
1038
54
980
v/c Ratio
0.31
0.28
0.50
0.16
0.41
Control Delay
14.9
6.0
7.9
5.5
4.8
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
14.9
6.0
7.9
5.5
4.8
Queue Length 50th (ft)
14
0
41
4
45
Queue Length 95th (ft)
46
25
#149
14
92
Internal Link Dist (ft)
1115
490
1244
Turn Bay Length (ft)
150
150
Base Capacity (vph)
525
539
2061
340
2421
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced'v/c Ratio
0.18
0.18
0.50
0.16
0.40
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Projected AM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 10/22/2012
'r 4-- t
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
If
ti
++
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
Frt
1.00
0.85
0.96
1.00
1.00
Fit Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1583
3386
1770
3539
Fit Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.20
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
1770
1583
3386
371
3539
Volume (vph)
88
91
679
276
50
902
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0-92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
96
99
738
300
54
980
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
83
57
0
0
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
96
16
981
0
54
980
Turn Type
Perm
pm+pt
Protected Phases
8
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
8
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
9.1
9.1
32.3
38.4
38.4
Effective Green, g (s)
9.1
9.1
32.3
38.4
38.4
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.16
0.16
0.58
0.69
0.69
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
290
260
1971
310
2449
v/s Ratio Prot
c0.05
c0.29
0.01
c0.28
v/s Ratio Perm
0.01
0.11
v/c Ratio
0.33
0.06
0.50
0.17
0.40
Uniform Delay, d1
20.5
19.6
6.8
3.7
3.6
Progression Factor
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Incremental Delay, d2
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
Delay (s)
21.2
19.7
7.0
4.0
3.8
Level of Service
C
B
A
A
A
Approach Delay (s)
20.4
7.0
3.8
Approach LOS
C
A
A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
6.7 HCM Level of Service A
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.47
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
55.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
45.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Projected AM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
AM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 1
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 10/22/2012
,,
4--
T
/
-
4
Movement
WEL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
?f
tk
tt
Sign Control
Stop
Free
Free
Grade
0%
0%
0%
Volume (veh/h)
134
14
905
218
35
669
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)
146
15
984
237
38
727
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume
1542
610
1221
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
1542
610
1221
tC, single (s)
6.8
6.9
4.1
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
3.5
3.3
2.2
p0 queue free %
0
97
93
cM capacity (veh/h)
99
437
567
Direction, Lane #
WB 1
WB 2
NB 1
NB 2
5B 1
SB 2
SB 3
Volume Total
146
15
656
565
38
364
364
Volume Left
146
0
0
0
38
0
0
Volume Right
0
15
0
237
0
0
0
cSH
99
437
1700
1700
567
1700
1700
Volume to Capacity
1.48
0.03
0.39
0.33
0.07
0.21
0.21
Queue Length 95th (ft)
272
3
0
0
5
0
0
Control Delay (s)
337.4
13.5
0.0
0.0
11.8
0.0
0.0
Lane LOS
F
B
B
Approach Delay (s)
306.8
0.0
0.6
Approach LOS
F
Intersection
Average Delay 23.2
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Projected PM Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
Queues Page 1
1: Pebble Beach & Rahlina Road 10/22/2012
t
Lane GroUp WBL WBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 15 1221 38 727
v/c Ratio 0.43 0.05 0.59 0.11 0.31
Control Delay 16.2 7.4 11.9 5.6 4.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 16.2 7.4 11.9 5.6 4.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 24 0 65 3 34
Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 10 #267 12 73
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1115 490 1244
Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150
Base Capacity (vph) 515 472 2066 334 2394
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.03 0.59 0.11 0.30
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Projected PM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Page 2
1: Pebble Beach & Rahling Road 10/22/2012
or 4-- t
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
Vi
r
+T
++
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
1900
Total Lost time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lane Util. Factor
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.95
Frt
1.00
0.85
0.97
1.00
1.00
Flt Protected
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
Satd. Flow (prot)
1770
1583
3436
1770
3539
Flt Permitted
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.14
1.00
Satd. Flow (perm)
1770
1583
3436
268
3539
Volume (vph)
134
14
905
218
35
669
Peak -hour factor, PHF
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
146
15
984
237
38
727
RTOR Reduction (vph)
0
12
28
0
0
0
Lane Group Flow (vph)
146
3
1193
0
38
727
Turn Type
Perm
pm+pt
Protected Phases
8
2
1
6
Permitted Phases
8
6
Actuated Green, G (s)
9.5
9.5
31.0
37.0
37.0
Effective Green, g (s)
9.5
9.5
31.0
37.0
37.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.17
0.17
0.57
0.68
0.68
Clearance Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Vehicle Extension (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 309
276
1954
237 2403
v/s Ratio Prot c0.08
c0.35
0.01 c0.21
v/s Ratio Perm
0.00
0.10
v/c Ratio 0.47
0.01
0.61
0.16 0.30
Uniform Delay, d1 20.2
18.6
7.8
4.6 3.5
Progression Factor 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.1
0.0
0.6
0.3 0.1
Delay (s) 21.4
18.6
8.3
4.9 3.6
Level of Service C
B
A
A A
Approach Delay (s) 21.1
8.3
3.7
Approach LOS C
A
A
Intersection Summary
HCM Average Control Delay
7.6
HCM Level of Service A
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
54.5
Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization
46.1 %
ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)
15
c Critical Lane Group
Projected PM WITH Signal at P Beach Peters & Associates Engineers, Inc.
PM P1378A Rahling - Re -Zoning