HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-8132 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z
NAME: Cycle Breakers, Inc. Short -form POD
LOCATION: Located at 800 Apperson Street
DEVELOPER:
Kenneth Haskin
401 West Markham Street, Suite 410
Little Rock, AR 72201
ENGINEER:
The Mehlburger Firm
201 Izard Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 4.1 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 Zoning Lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
CURRENT ZONING: R-3, Single-family
ALLOWED USES
Single-family
ROPOSED ZONING: PD -O
PROPOSED USE: Cycle Breakers
VARIAN CESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: A five (5) year deferral of the required hard
surface parking.
A. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The project is located at 800 Apperson Street bordered by Calhoun and 9th
Streets. The site contains 4.0 acres of land and a 37,400 square foot building;
formerly Carver Elementary School. Part of the property contains a paved
asphalt area that has been, and will continue to be, used for parking. There is a
large field containing grass that will also be used for additional parking. The
applicant is requesting a five (5) year deferral of the required hard surface
parking in light of the acquisitions that the Little Rock Airport Commission is
making in the area. The only structural change to the building planned at this
time is to enclose a breezeway on the southwest side of the building to
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
accommodate a residential living area. There is presently a fence along the
perimeter of the property that will be repaired where broken and extended to
enclose other areas that are presently open.
Dev(-,IQP
—ment Rationale of the Project
General Information – Cycle Breakers, Inc. is a non-profit organization that
started in 2001 and began operating under Section 501 of the Internal Revenue
Code in 2003. The "CYCLE" in "Cycle Breakers" stands for Changing Your
Circumstances by Life Emending. The Mission of the Cycle Breakers Program is
to aggressively intervene in the lives of individuals in the time to stop the cycle of
crime. The program is designed to fully utilize the period while an individual is
under the Court's jurisdiction and supervision to effect a lasting and permanent
change in the lifestyles, behaviors and decision-making abilities of program
participants.
Cycle Breakers, Inc. grew out of the Cycle Breakers program that was originally
funded by the Pulaski County Quorum Court in 2001; and therefore, it works
closely with the Fifth Division Circuit Court of Pulaski County. The Cycle
Breakers Program seeks to carry out this mission by recruiting Community
Mentors and cultivating Mentors from within the program who will have a positive
influence upon the program participants. The program will sponsor daily
meetings that focus on addictions. The primarily focus is upon drug and alcohol
addictions; however, others struggling with addictive behaviors also benefit from
the program. The program offers a holistic approach to addiction that relies
heavily upon the 12 -step Program but is based on teachings that change the
behavior of the inner, spiritual man. Counseling sessions are also offered for
probationers with anger management and domestic abuse issues on a daily
basis as needed.
Once a month approximately 80 probationers attend informational and
educational sessions that are designed to provide them with the tools to change.
Cycle Breakers partners with the community and governmental organizations to
provide sessions that deal with education, finance, job skills, family issues,
mental and physical health. Probationers are connected with resources to help
them. This program was so successful that it was extended to every probationer.
As a result, every quarter a meeting is held where all of the probationers have
access to these sessions.
Presently, these quarterly meetings are held at the Barton Coliseum. These
meetings focus on four broad areas: 1. Finance and Jobs; 2. Education; 3. Abuse
and Additions; and 4. Mental and Physical Health. During 2006, the focus has
been on metal and physical height. The organization partnered with UAMS, the
Health Department, Stamp out Smoking, the Witness Project, the Arkansas
Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Pulaski County Extension Service, and many
other organizations and provided screening for Brest Cancer, Prostate Cancer,
Diabetes, Cholesterol, Vision, Stroke, Body Mass Index, Blood Pressure,
AIDS/STD, and dental care. Lives were saved. Cancers were detected early
6
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
and treatment is being given. Persons at risk for diabetes, strokes, and
hypertension were identified and referred to treatment. Free vision screenings
were offered to persons who could not afford care. The savings to County and
the State in terms of health care costs and quality of life are immeasurable.
The building will house prevention and intervention programs that are offered to
the approximately 1,000 probationers that are assigned to the Court.
Project Components
Hours of Operation — Daily Operations — The day to day operations of the
building will be from Monday to Friday from 8:00 am to 8:30 pm. During these
times, Group Sessions and Individual sessions will be offered to probationers.
These sessions will deal with: 1. Finance and Jobs; 2. Education; 3. Abuse and
Addictions; and 4. Mental and Physical Health. There will also be classes
offered. The planned classes include GED classes, automotive trades, computer
classes, and other trades. The office will be staffed by a full time office manager,
a full time security officer part-time teachers, and counselors. The applicant will
serve as the facility manager and will be ultimately responsible for all activities
that take place on the premises of the facility. There is a staff of five other deputy
probation officers that will assist the applicant in managing the facility.
Monthly Operations — Once a month during eight of the months of the year, there
will be a meeting with approximately 100 probationers. These probationers are
mostly non-violent first offenders. Four times during the year, these meetings are
held on Saturday from 8:00 am to 2:30 pm. Four times during the year, meetings
area held on a weeknight from 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm. These are the informational
and educational sessions that are designed to provide probationers with the tools
to change the items discussed previously.
Quarterly Operations — On one Saturday during each quarter of the year,, a
meeting will be held where 600 probationers will attend the meeting. The
quarterly meetings are operated from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm. This year, the
meetings were held during March, June, August and November. Because of the
size of the meeting and the parking space that is available, the meetings will be
divided into two smaller groups. The first meeting will be held from 7:00 am to
11:00 am and the second meeting from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm. This will assist with
traffic flow in the area. The applicant anticipates that each session will have
approximately 250 to 300 participants.
Chemical Free Living Facility — The Chemical Free Living Facility will be open to
probationers that have a drug or alcohol problem. Residents will be strictly
supervised and monitored directly by members of the Fifth Division staff. The
facility will be staffed by a resident manager who will be on the premises from
8:00 pm to 8:00 am. The facility will be limited to ten (10) probationers that will
live on the premises. The premises will be secured. Residents will be required
to work during the day or be involved in the sessions or classes that are offered
3
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
during the day. Residents will have a 10:00 pm curfew from Sunday to Thursday
and 12:00 am curfew on Friday and Saturday.
Parking — Deferral Request — The property is located one block from the property
the Little Rock Airport Commission has recently condemned. Contacts with the
Little Rock Airport Commission have indicated future plans include the
acquisition of this property. The plan, however, is to not take the property for
approximately ten (10) years. An estimate for surfacing the grass parking area
was secured. The estimated cost is $175,000.00 to install the asphalt parking lot
which would accommodate approximately 400 cars. The applicant has indicated
this would not be prudent at this time. First, the property will be condemned and
it is unlikely the applicant's would be able to recoup the investment. Secondly, a
paved parking lot would be unattractive and would not conducive to the
neighborhood. The request includes a 5 year deferral for the required parking.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS.-
The
ONDITIONS:
The site is the former Carver Elementary School most recently used as an
Alternative School by the Little Rock School District. The site is located within an
area the Little Rock Airport Commission has shown on the Master Plan for
acquisition. There are a number of uses in the area including the Little Rock
Airport, residential structures, industrial and churches. Along East 6th Street
there are a number of commercial businesses.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area
residents. All property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, all residents,
who could be identified, located within 300 -feet of the site and the East Little
Rock Neighborhood Association were notified of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the
public right-of-way prior to occupancy. From initial inspection, the
sidewalk on 9th Street is damaged and should repaired. Additional
improvements may be required after additional inspections.
2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with
Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. Ramps
should be installed at the intersections.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
12
FILE NO.: Z-8
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Energy: No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or
additional water meter(s) are required.
Fire Department: Approved as submitted.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
F. 1SSUESITECHNICAUDESIGN:
Planning Division: This request is located in the East Little Rock Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this property. The
applicant has applied for a rezoning to Planned Office Development to allow the
site to be used for meeting space, classroom space, office space and residential
living to accommodate probationers.
The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan: Apperson Street and East 9th Street are shown as Local
Streets on the Master Street Plan. Local Streets with non-residential uses along
them are constructed with a wider cross section. These streets may require
dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary
function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties.
Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the
immediate vicinity of the development.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not
located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood
action plan.
Landscape:
1. Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance
requirements.
2. Landscaping may be required with any on site parking.
3. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees
as feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape
Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch
caliper or larger.
5
ILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
G
H
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (November 16, 2006)
The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an
overview of the proposed development indicating there were a few outstanding
issues associated with the request. Staff questioned the proposed surface
material of the grass parking lot. Staff also questioned the total number of
parking spaces that could be provided within the grass field area. Staff
questioned ownership of the property. The applicant stated Cycle Breakers Inc.
would purchase the land and then dedicate the building and land to Pulaski
County. Staff questioned the total number of probationers accessing the site on
any given day. The applicant stated the desire was to expand the available
educational services. He stated if this was successful there would be
approximately 70 to 80 persons daily accessing the site.
Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated sidewalks would be
required per the Master Street Plan along abutting roadways. Staff also stated
any broken curb, gutter or sidewalk would require repair prior to occupancy.
Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated landscaping may be
required with any additional on-site paving. Staff also stated the City Beautiful
Commission recommended preserving as many on-site trees as feasible.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and
agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information
and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee
then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised cover letter to staff addressing most of the
concerns raised at the November 16, 2006, Subdivision Committee meeting.
The applicant has indicated approximately 311 cars can be parked in the open
field area. A total of eight rows of parking are available with an estimated area of
eight feet in width and eighteen feet in length. The row adjacent to the northern
most end of the property will park approximately 32 cars, a second row will park
approximately 31 cars and six rows will park approximately 62 cars. Twenty-four
feet will be placed between each row of parking for drives. A smaller area of land
located nearer the building will provide two additional rows of parking and will
park approximately 44 cars. The applicant has retained Ronnie Geddings, a
former Deputy Probation Officer to coordinate the parking. He presently
coordinates parking at the Arkansas State Fairgrounds and parking on the golf
course at Razorback football games. The request includes a five year deferral of
the required hard surface material. According to the applicant in addition to the
cost of construction, the neighborhood does not desire the area to paved. The
site is used by area residents for pee wee football games. The paving of the
grass field will take away a valuable amenity the neighborhood currently utilizes
for open space and outdoor recreation.
On the site there are 21 marked parking spaces and one handicap space. There
is additional space on the basketball court which is paved and can be used as
L
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
parking for an additional 15 parking spaces. The site contains a total of 36 hard
surface parking spaces.
Staff is supportive of the proposed use of the building for the applicant's intended
use but staff has concerns with the parking as proposed. On any given day the
provided parking does not appear to be adequate to meet the parking demands
of the patrons accessing the site. In addition on the day of the quarterly
meetings there will be a great deal of traffic accessing the site which staff feels
will spill into the neighborhood creating a hardship on the residents of the area.
The site is located within the only pocket of residential homes left in the area.
Although the area has been identified on the Airport's Master Plan for future
acquisition staff feels the neighborhood should be protected in the interim.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends denial of the request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (DECEMBER 7, 2006)
The applicant was present. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented
the item with a recommendation of denial. Mr. Kenneth Haskin addressed the
Commission on the merits of the request. He stated Cycle Breakers had been looking
for a location for a couple of years and when the school became available they felt this
was a perfect location for their use. He stated the group would protect the
neighborhood. He stated the project was established to aid the needs of the
probationers served. He stated he felt this was an opportunity to serve the community.
Mr. Mark Leverett addressed the Commission to discuss the parking concerns. He
stated he was not a parking expert but felt the plan Cycle Breakers had in place would
allow sufficient parking and would protect the neighborhood. He stated there were two
areas designated as parking. He stated a total of 300 cars could park on the open field
and another 30 to 40 cars on the parking lot and on the basketball court. He stated the
meetings would be broken into two sessions to not flood the neighborhood with cars
and people. He stated a specific route would be designated minimize the impact on the
neighborhood. He stated Cycle Breakers would hire a parking expert to coordinate
traffic to and from the site to also minimize the impact on the neighborhood. He stated
the safety of the residents was Cycle Breakers first concern.
Mr. Ronnie Jackson addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated
his home and church were located in the neighborhood. He stated there were a number
of youth and elderly in the neighborhood. He stated during the summer he would take
the youth of his bible class to the basketball courts to play ball. He stated he agreed the
programs was a good program. He stated he did not feel the program should be
located in a residential neighborhood.
Ms. Margie Goodman addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She
stated her mother lived across from the site and she was very concerned for her safety
7
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
if the use was approved. She stated there were a number of children in the
neighborhood and she was also concerned for their safety. She stated she agreed with
the program, just not the location of the program.
Mr. Elijah Shepard, Sr. addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He
stated his home was located across from the field the applicant's were proposing for
parking. He stated he was not in favor of allowing the field to become fenced and a
parking lot. He stated he was also concerned with the allowance of residents on the
site. He stated he was concerned the residents would spill into the neighborhood and
create an unsafe environment.
Ms. Kay Davis addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated her
mother was 76 and had lived in the neighborhood a number of years. She stated her
home was located directly across the street from the site and her mother had stated if
the use was approved she would not be able to sleep at night. She stated the site was
two blocks for an elementary school and a few blocks from the community center. She
stated with the airports current acquisition the neighborhood had suffered enough. She
stated her primary concern was the safety of the neighborhood and protection of the
neighborhood.
Mr. Onzell Wright addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated
his mother lived in the area and his church was located in the area. He stated his
concern was for his mother and for the church. He stated he felt the residents should
have the opportunity to enjoy their homes and sit on their front porches without fear.
She stated he felt Cycle Breakers was a good program but he did not feel the location
was appropriate for their use. He stated the fabric of the neighborhood has declined
based on the acquisitions of the airport. He stated he felt this use would cause
additional decline in the area.
Mr. Haskins stated the site would house a chemical free living environment with a
maximum of ten residents. He stated the residents did not just roam the neighborhood
they work or are involved in programs offered through Cycle Breakers. He stated crime
exist in all neighborhoods. He stated the persons in the program were first time
offenders and had an incentive to completing the program and many could have their
record expunged if they were successful in the program.
He stated he did not see any link to the use and the decline in property values. He
stated presently the chemical free living facility was located on Wolfe Street and the
area had not seen a decline in property values as a result of the facility. He stated
presently there were two residents but as many as eight person had lived in the facility.
The Commission questioned the number of probationers accessing the site.
Mr. Haskins stated in the beginning 20 to 30 per week. He stated as the center grew as
many as 70 to 80 per day. He stated the center would offer counseling, anger
management, financial management and educational opportunities to complete their
GED. He stated there was a critical need for the service. He stated education was the
key to breaking the patterns of the offenders.
E:3
FILE NO.: Z-8132 (Cont.
The Commission questioned the funding. Mr. Haskins stated funding was provided by
the probationers through court fees. The Commission questioned if the County would
be involved in the operation of the facility. Mr. Haskin stated the probation officers were
members of the 5th Circuit Court. The Commission questioned if the person staying
overnight with the residents would be a probation officer. Mr. Haskins stated he was not
sure since they had not hired anyone. He stated the person would be specially trained
for this type situation.
Commissioner Yates questioned the difference in a parolee and probationer.
Mr. Haskins stated a probationer had not been to prison was the primary difference.
Commissioner Yates questioned the number of probation officers who would be at the
site daily. Mr. Haskins stated three to five at any given time. Commissioner Yates
questioned the number of probationers per instructor. He stated fifteen to twenty
probationers per instructor.
The Commission discussed their concerns of placing the proposed use in the fragile
neighborhood. The Commissioners stated they felt the service was a good service but
questioned placing the use within the heart of a single-family neighborhood.
Commissioner Williams stated he felt the program was an outstanding program.
Commissioner Meyer questioned the balance of an empty building verses an occupied
building. Commissioner Rahman stated he questioned placing the use in a fragile
neighborhood without knowing what the traffic and parking would do to the area. He
stated he felt the use would continue to erode the neighborhood.
A motion was made to approve the request as filed. The motion failed by a vote of
3 ayes, 5 noes and 3 absent.
N
December 7, 2006
M NO.: 19 FILE NO.: Z-8132
NAME: Cycle Breakers, Inc. Short -form POD
LOCATION: Located at 800 Apperson Street
DEVELOPER:
Kenneth Haskin
401 West Markham Street, Suite 410
Little Rock, AR 72201
ENGINEER:
The Mehlburger Firm
201 Izard Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
AREA: 4.1 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 Zoning Lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
CURRENT ZONING: R-3, Single-family
ALLOWED USES: Single-family
PROPOSED ZONING: PD -O
PROPOSED USE: Cycle Breakers
VARIANCES/VVAIVERS REQUESTED: A five (5) year deferral of the required hard
surface parking.
A. APPLICANT'S PROPOSAVREQUEST:
The project is located at 800 Apperson Street bordered by Calhoun and 9th
Streets. The site contains 4.0 acres of land and a 37,400 square foot building;
formerly Carver Elementary School. Part of the property contains a paved
asphalt area that has been, and will continue to be, used for parking. There is a
large field containing grass that will also be used for additional parking. The
applicant is requesting a five (5) year deferral of the required hard surface
parking in light of the acquisitions that the Little Rock Airport Commission is
making in the area. The only structural change to the building planned at this
time is to enclose a breezeway on the southwest side of the building to
December 7, 2006,
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19(Cont.)FILE NO.: Z-8132
accommodate a residential living area. There is presently a fence along the
perimeter of the property that will be repaired where broken and extended to
enclose other areas that are presently open.
Development Rationale of the Pro ect
General Information — Cycle Breakers, Inc. is a non-profit organization that
started in 2001 and began operating under Section 501 of the Internal Revenue
Code in 2003. The "CYCLE" in "Cycle Breakers" stands for Changing Your
Circumstances by Life Emending. The Mission of the Cycle Breakers Program is
to aggressively intervene in the lives of individuals in the time to stop the cycle of
crime. The program is designed to fully utilize the period while an individual is
under the Court's jurisdiction and supervision to effect a lasting and permanent
change in the lifestyles, behaviors and decision-making abilities of program
participants.
Cycle Breakers, Inc. grew out of the Cycle Breakers program that was originally
funded by the Pulaski County Quorum Court in 2001; and therefore, it works
closely with the Fifth Division Circuit Court of Pulaski County. The Cycle
Breakers Program seeks to carry out this mission by recruiting Community
Mentors and cultivating Mentors from within the program who will have a positive
influence upon the program participants. The program will sponsor daily
meetings that focus on addictions. The primarily focus is upon drug and alcohol
addictions; however, others struggling with addictive behaviors also benefit from
the program. The program offers a holistic approach to addiction that relies
heavily upon the 12 -step Program but is based on teachings that change the
behavior of the inner, spiritual man. Counseling sessions are also offered for
probationers with anger management and domestic abuse issues on a daily
basis as needed.
Once a month approximately 80 probationers attend informational and
educational sessions that are designed to provide them with the tools to change.
Cycle Breakers partners with the community and governmental organizations to
provide sessions that deal with education, finance, job skills, family issues,
mental and physical health. Probationers are connected with resources to help
them. This program was so successful that it was extended to every probationer.
As a result, every quarter a meeting is held where all of the probationers have
access to these sessions.
Presently, these quarterly meetings are held at the Barton Coliseum. These
meetings focus on four broad areas: 1. Finance and Jobs; 2. Education; 3. Abuse
and Additions; and 4. Mental and Physical Health. During 2006, the focus has
been on metal and physical height. The organization partnered with UAMS, the
Health Department, Stamp out Smoking, the Witness Project, the Arkansas
Prostate Cancer Foundation, the Pulaski County Extension Service, and many
2
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-8132
other organizations and provided screening for Brest Cancer, Prostate Cancer,
Diabetes, Cholesterol, Vision, Stroke, Body Mass Index, Blood Pressure,
AIDS/STD, and dental care. Lives were saved. Cancers were detected early
and treatment is being given. Persons at risk for diabetes, strokes, and
hypertension were identified and referred to treatment. Free vision screenings
were offered to persons who could not afford care. The savings to County and
the State in terms of health care costs and quality of life are immeasurable.
The building will house prevention and intervention programs that are offered to
the approximately 1,000 probationers that are assigned to the Court.
Project Components
Hours of Operation — Daily Operations — The day to day operations of the
building will be from Monday to Friday from 8:00 am to 8:30 pm. During these
times, Group Sessions and Individual sessions will be offered to probationers.
These sessions will deal with: 1. Finance and Jobs; 2. Education; 3. Abuse and
Addictions; and 4. Mental and Physical Health. There will also be classes
offered. The planned classes include GED classes, automotive trades, computer
classes, and other trades. The office will be staffed by a full time office manager,
a full time security officer part-time teachers, and counselors. The applicant will
serve as the facility manager and will be ultimately responsible for all activities
that take place on the premises of the facility. There is a staff of five other deputy
probation officers that will assist the applicant in managing the facility.
Monthly Operations — Once a month during eight of the months of the year, there
will be a meeting with approximately 100 probationers. These probationers are
mostly non-violent first offenders. Four times during the year, these meetings are
held on Saturday from 8:00 am to 2:30 pm. Four times during the year, meetings
area held on a weeknight from 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm. These are the informational
and educational sessions that are designed to provide probationers with the tools
to change the items discussed previously.
Quarterly Operations — On one Saturday during each quarter of the year, a
meeting will be held where 600 probationers will attend the meeting. The
quarterly meetings are operated from 7:00 am to 4:00 pm. This year, the
meetings were held during March, June, August and November. Because of the
size of the meeting and the parking space that is available, the meetings will be
divided into two smaller groups. The first meeting will be held from 7:00 am to
11:00 am and the second meeting from 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm. This will assist with
traffic flow in the area. The applicant anticipates that each session will have
approximately 250 to 300 participants.
Chemical Free Living Facility — The Chemical Free Living Facility will be open to
probationers that have a drug or alcohol problem. Residents will be strictly
3
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-8132
supervised and monitored directly by members of the Fifth Division staff. The
facility will be staffed by a resident manager who will be on the premises from
8:00 pm to 8:00 am. The facility will be limited to ten (10) probationers that will
live on the premises. The premises will be secured. Residents will be required
to work during the day or be involved in the sessions or classes that are offered
during the day. Residents will have a 10:00 pm curfew from Sunday to Thursday
and 12:00 am curfew on Friday and Saturday.
Parking — Deferral Request — The property is located one block from the property
the Little Rock Airport Commission has recently condemned. Contacts with the
Little Rock Airport Commission have indicated future plans include the
acquisition of this property. The plan, however, is to not take the property for
approximately ten (10) years. An estimate for surfacing the grass parking area
was secured. The estimated cost is $175,000.00 to install the asphalt parking lot
which would accommodate approximately 400 cars. The applicant has indicated
this would not be prudent at this time. First, the property will be condemned and
it is unlikely the applicant's would be able to recoup the investment. Secondly, a
paved parking lot would be unattractive and would not conducive to the
neighborhood. The request includes a 5 year deferral for the required parking.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is the former Carver Elementary School most recently used as an
Alternative School by the Little Rock School District. The site is located within an
area the Little Rock Airport Commission has shown on the Master Plan for
acquisition. There are a number of uses in the area including the Little Rock
Airport, residential structures, industrial and churches. Along East 6th Street
there are a number of commercial businesses.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area
residents. All property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, all residents,
who could be identified, located within 300 -feet of the site and the East Little
Rock Neighborhood Association were notified of the public hearing.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the
public right-of-way prior to occupancy. From initial inspection, the
sidewalk on 9th Street is damaged and should repaired. Additional
improvements may be required after additional inspections.
12
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-8132
2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with
Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. Ramps
should be installed at the intersections.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENTICOUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Ener : No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or
additional water meter(s) are required.
Fire Department: Approved as submitted.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
F. ISSU ESITECH N ICAL/D ESI G N :
Planning Division: This request is located in the East Little Rock Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this property. The
applicant has applied for a rezoning to Planned Office Development to allow the
site to be used for meeting space, classroom space, office space and residential
living to accommodate probationers.
The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan: Apperson Street and East 9th Street are shown as Local
Streets on the Master Street Plan. Local Streets with non-residential uses along
them are constructed with a wider cross section. These streets may require
dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. The primary
function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties.
Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the
immediate vicinity of the development.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not
located in an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood
action plan.
5
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.. 19 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-8132
Landscape:
1. Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance
requirements.
2. Landscaping may be required with any on site parking.
3. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees
as feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape
Ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch
caliper or larger.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (November 16, 2006)
The applicant was present representing the request. Staff presented an
overview of the proposed development indicating there were a few outstanding
issues associated with the request. Staff questioned the proposed surface
material of the grass parking lot. Staff also questioned the total number of
parking spaces that could be provided within the grass field area. Staff
questioned ownership of the property. The applicant stated Cycle Breakers Inc.
would purchase the land and then dedicate the building and land to Pulaski
County. Staff questioned the total number of probationers accessing the site on
- - ------any-given--day:-- The -applicant-. stated -the -desire --was- to--expand--the-available----
educational services. He stated if this was successful there would be
approximately 70 to 80 persons daily accessing the site.
Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated sidewalks would be
required per the Master Street Plan along abutting roadways. Staff also stated
any broken curb, gutter or sidewalk would require repair prior to occupancy.
Landscaping comments were addressed. Staff stated landscaping may be
required with any additional on-site paving. Staff also stated the City Beautiful
Commission recommended preserving as many on-site trees as feasible.
Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and
agencies suggesting the applicant contact them directly for additional information
and clarification. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee
then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action.
H. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised cover letter to staff addressing most of the
concerns raised at the November 16, 2006, Subdivision Committee meeting.
The applicant has indicated approximately 311 cars can be parked in the open
field area. A total of eight rows of parking are available with an estimated area of
eight feet in width and eighteen feet in length, The row adjacent to the northern
most end of the property will park approximately 32 cars, a second row will park
approximately 31 cars and six rows will park approximately 62 cars. Twenty-four
feet will be placed between each row of parking for drives. A smaller area of land
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 Cont, FILE NO.: Z-8132
located nearer the building will provide two additional rows of parking and will
park approximately 44 cars. The applicant has retained Ronnie Geddings, a
former Deputy Probation Officer to coordinate the parking. He presently
coordinates parking at the Arkansas State Fairgrounds and parking on the golf
course at Razorback football games. The request includes a five year deferral of
the required hard surface material. According to the applicant in addition to the
cost of construction, the neighborhood does not desire the area to paved. The
site is used by area residents for pee wee football games. The paving of the
grass field will take away a valuable amenity the neighborhood currently utilizes
for open space and outdoor recreation.
On the site there are 21 marked parking spaces and one handicap space. There
is additional space on the basketball court which is paved and can be used as
parking for an additional 15 parking spaces. The site contains a total of 36 hard
surface parking spaces.
Staff is supportive of the proposed use of the building for the applicant's intended
use but staff has concerns with the parking as proposed. On any given day the
provided parking does not appear to be adequate to meet the parking demands
of the patrons accessing the site. In addition on the day of the quarterly
meetings there will be a great deal of traffic accessing the site which staff feels
will spill into the neighborhood creating a hardship on the residents of the area.
The site is located within the only pocket of residential homes left in the area.
Although the area has been identified on the Airport's Master Plan for future
acquisition staff feels the neighborhood should be protected in the interim.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends denial of the request as filed
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (DECEMBER 7, 2006)
The applicant was present. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented
the item with a recommendation of denial. Mr. Kenneth Haskin addressed the
Commission on the merits of the request. He stated Cycle Breakers had been looking
for a location for a couple of years and when the school became available they felt this
was a perfect location for their use. He stated the group would protect the
neighborhood. He stated the project was established to aid the needs of the
probationers served. He stated he felt this was an opportunity to serve the community.
Mr. Mark Leverett addressed the Commission to discuss the parking concerns. He
stated he was not a parking expert but felt the plan Cycle Breakers had in place would
allow sufficient parking and would protect the neighborhood. He stated there were two
areas designated as parking. He stated a total of 300 cars could park on the open field
and another 30 to 40 cars on the parking lot and on the basketball court. He stated the
7
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-6132
meetings would be broken into two sessions to not flood the neighborhood with cars
and people. He stated a specific route would be designated minimize the impact on the
neighborhood. He stated Cycle Breakers would hire a parking expert to coordinate
traffic to and from the site to also minimize the impact on the neighborhood. He stated
the safety of the residents was Cycle Breakers first concern.
Mr. Ronnie Jackson addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated
his home and church were located in the neighborhood. He stated there were a number
of youth and elderly in the neighborhood. He stated during the summer he would take
the youth of his bible class to the basketball courts to play ball. He stated he agreed the
programs was a good program. He stated he did not feel the program should be
located in a residential neighborhood.
Ms. Margie Goodman addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She
stated her mother lived across from the site and she was very concerned for her safety
if the use was approved. She stated there were a number of children in the
neighborhood and she was also concerned for their safety. She stated she agreed with
the program, just not the location of the program.
Mr. Elijah Shepard, Sr. addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He
stated his home was located across from the field the applicant's were proposing for
parking. He stated he was not in favor of allowing the field to become fenced and a
parking lot. He stated he was also concerned with the allowance of residents on the
site. He stated he was concerned the residents would spill into the neighborhood and
create an unsafe environment.
Ms. Kay Davis addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated her
mother was 76 and had lived in the neighborhood a number of years. She stated her
home was located directiv across the street from_ the site and her mother had stated if
the use was approved she would not be able to sleep at night. She stated the site was
two blocks for an elementary school and a few blocks from the community center. She
stated with the airports current acquisition the neighborhood had suffered enough. She
stated her primary concern was the safety of the neighborhood and protection of the
neighborhood.
Mr. Onzell Wright addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated
his mother lived in the area and his church was located in the area. He stated his
concern was for his mother and for the church. He stated he felt the residents should
have the opportunity to enjoy their homes and sit on their front porches without fear.
She stated he felt Cycle Breakers was a good program but he did not feel the location
was appropriate for their use. He stated the fabric of the neighborhood has declined
based on the acquisitions of the airport. He stated he felt this use would cause
additional decline in the area.
E
December 7, 2006
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 19 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-8132
Mr. Haskins stated the site would house a chemical free living environment with a
maximum of ten residents. He stated the residents did not just roam the neighborhood
they work or are involved in programs offered through Cycle Breakers. He stated crime
exist in all neighborhoods. He stated the persons in the program were first time
offenders and had an incentive to completing the program and many could have their
record expunged if they were successful in the program.
He stated he did not see any link to the use and the decline in property values. He
stated presently the chemical free living facility was located on Wolfe Street and the
area had not seen a decline in property values as a result of the facility. He stated
presently there were two residents but as many as eight person had lived in the facility.
The Commission questioned the number of probationers accessing the site.
Mr. Haskins stated in the beginning 20 to 30 per week. He stated as the center grew as
many as 70 to 80 per day. He stated the center would offer counseling, anger
management, financial management and educational opportunities to complete their
GED. He stated there was a critical need for the service. He stated education was the
key to breaking the patterns of the offenders.
The Commission questioned the funding. Mr. Haskins stated funding was provided by
the probationers through court fees. The Commission questioned if the County would
be involved in the operation of the facility. Mr. Haskin stated the probation officers were
members of the 5t" Circuit Court. The Commission questioned if the person staying
overnight with the residents would be a probation officer. Mr. Haskins stated he was not
sure since they had not hired anyone. He stated the person would be specially trained
for this type situation.
Commissioner Yates questioned the difference in a parolee and probationer.
Mr. Haskins stated a probationer had not been_ to prison was the _primary difference.
Commissioner Yates questioned the number of probation officers who would be at the
site daily. Mr. Haskins stated three to five at any given time. Commissioner Yates
questioned the number of probationers per instructor. He stated fifteen to twenty
probationers per instructor.
The Commission discussed their concerns of placing the proposed use in the fragile
neighborhood. The Commissioners stated they felt the service was a good service but
questioned placing the use within the heart of a single-family neighborhood.
Commissioner Williams stated he felt the program was an outstanding program.
Commissioner Meyer questioned the balance of an empty building verses an occupied
building. Commissioner Rahman stated he questioned placing the use in a fragile
neighborhood without knowing what the traffic and parking would do to the area. He
stated he felt the use would continue to erode the neighborhood.
A motion was made to approve the request as filed. The motion failed by a vote of
3 ayes, 5 noes and 3 absent.
N
ITEM NO.: 19,
NAME: Cycle Breakers, Inc. Short -form POD
LOCATION: located at 800 Apperson Street
Planning Staff Comments:
Z-8132
1. Provide notification of all property owners located within 200 -feet of the site,
complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof
of mailing. The notice must be mailed no later than November 22, 2006. The Office
of Planning and Development must receive the proof of notice no later than
November 30, 2006.
2. Provide the total number of hard surface parking spaces on the site.
3. Provide details of the surface for the proposed grass parking filed and the total
number of anticipated parking spaces within the field area. One section of the cover
letter indicates a five year waiver and a second section indicates a ten year waiver of
the hard surface parking.
Variance/Waivers: A deferral of the required hard surface parking area.
Public Works Conditions:
1. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-
of-way prior to occupancy. From initial inspection, the sidewalk on 9th Street is
damaged and should repaired. Additional improvements may be required after
additional inspections.
2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with Section
31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. Ramps should be
installed at the intersections.
Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning:
Wastewater: Sewer available to this property.
Entergy: No comment received.
Center -Point Energy: No comment received.
AT & T: No comment received.
Central Arkansas Water: Contact Central Arkansas Water if larger and/or additional
water meter(s) are required.
Item # 19
Fire Department: Approved as submitted.
County Planning: No comment.
CATA: The site is not located on a dedicated CATA Bus Route.
Planning Division- This request is located in the East Little Rock Planning District. The
Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this property. The applicant has applied for
a rezoning to Planned Office Development to allow the site to be used for meeting
space, classroom space, office space and residential living to accommodate
probationers.
The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan: Apperson Street and East 9t" Street are shown as Local Streets on
the Master Street Plan. Local Streets with non-residential uses along them are
constructed with a wider cross section. These streets may require dedication of right-of-
way and may require street improvements. The primary function of a Local Street is to
provide access to adjacent properties.
Bicycle Plan: Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III Bikeways are not in the immediate
vicinity of the development.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The property under review is not located in
an area covered by a City of Little Rock recognized neighborhood action plan.
Landscape:
1. Site plan must comply with the City's minimal landscape and buffer ordinance
requirements.
2. Landscaping may be required with any on site parking.
3. The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many existing trees as
feasible on this tree covered site. Credit toward fulfilling Landscape Ordinance
requirements can be given when preserving trees of six (6) inch caliper or larger.
Revisedpllat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plat (to include the
additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, November 22, 2006.
Item # 19