Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7954 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-7954 NAME: McCormick Short -form PD -R LOCATION: Located on the Southeast corner of West Markham Street and Donna Drive DEVELOPER: John McCormick 2608 West 7t" Street Little Rock, AR 72205 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 10 Otter Creek Court, Suite A Little Rock, AR 72210 AREA: 0.69 acres CURRENT ZONING: ALLOWED USES: PROPOSED ZONING NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 R-2, Single-family Single-family residential .� . FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF PROPOSED USE: Single-family — Zero Lot Line Residential VARIANCESMAIVERS REQUESTED- None requested. A. PROPOSAUREQUEST: The applicant is proposing the rezoning of this 0.69 acre site from R-2, Single- family to PD -R to allow development of the site with five zero lot line single-family homes. Three of the homes will front on West Markham Street and two of the homes will front on Donna Drive. The applicant has indicated an average lot size of 5,680 square feet. The applicant has also proposed the maximum square footage of the homes proposed as 1,685 and a minimum square footage of 1,450 square feet of heated and cooled space. The units are proposed with a single - car garage. FILE NO.: Z-7954 (Cont.) B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains an existing single-family structure facing West Markham Street. There are single-family homes located along West Markham Street to the North, East and West of the site. There are also single-family homes located to the south of the site, abutting Donna Drive. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. The Santa Fe Heights Neighborhood Association, all property owners located within 200 -feet of the site and all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Public Works Conditions: 1. Markham Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial with special design standards. A dedication of right-of-way 35 feet from centerline will be required. 2. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 3. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 4. Close old curb cuts. 5. Due to safety concerns and traffic volumes on Markham Street of 21,000 trips per day in 2003, no access is allowed on Markham Street. Access should be taken on Donna Drive instead. 6. A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Markham Street and Donna Drive. 7. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield) for more information. 8. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements, if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: No comment received. 2 9111:8►[0aiAIM SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3700 for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #5 — West Markham Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Rodney Parham Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Residential Development for the creation of five single family detached homes. The proposal does not have a significant impact on the Land Use Plan, which would necessitate a Plan Amendment. This project area is small in scale and the uses are similar to the surrounding uses of single-family houses. Master Street Plan: West Markham Street is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan and Donna Drive is shown as a Local Street. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Markham is built to a four -lane section and Donna Drive is built to a two-lane section. Bicycle Plan: The closest bikeway to the site is along Rock Creek just north of the 1-630 freeway. It is about one-quarter of a mile to the south of the application. A Class One bikeway is totally separated from the automobile lanes. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the West Markham Neighborhood Action Plan. The Infrastructure goal listed objectives of "Have Neighborhood Associations lobby the city to not grant variances for sidewalk construction requirements for any redevelopment or new construction in the neighborhood" and "Seek federal enhancement moneys for sidewalk construction along arterials. The Housing Goal listed objectives and action statements of "Increase the amount of owner occupied homes in the area" and "Market the are to young families with children. 3 FILE NO.: Z-7954 (Cont. A.) Low market values encourage investment in rental properties. B.) Keep property values up." Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (October 20, 2005) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the applicant. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development indicating there were additional items necessary to complete the review process. Staff questioned if there were utilities located in the indicated 15 -foot easement. Mr. McGetrick stated he was not aware of any utilities within the easement but felt the development could be designed without the abandonment of the easement. Staff stated the proposed site plan included the placement of three drives along West Markham Street. Staff stated they were not supportive of the proposed driveway locations. Staff suggested Mr. McGetrick relocate the drives to Donna Drive. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated all old curb cuts would be required to be closed. Staff also stated the storm water detention ordinance would not apply to the proposed development due to the total land area being less than one acre. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies; suggesting the applicant contact them individually for further clarification. There was no further discussion of the item and the Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the October 20, 2005, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated a single drive to the proposed development from Donna Drive. Each of the units will be rear loaded with a cross access easement for the drive. The applicant has indicated the development of the proposed lots with a 25 -foot building line adjacent to Donna Drive and a 35 -foot building line adjacent to West Markham Street. The applicant has proposed a minimum lot width of 40 -feet and a minimum lot area of 5,260 square feet. The applicant is proposing the development of the lots as a zero lot line single-family development. The ordinance typically requires a minimum lot width of 40 -feet and a minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet. The applicant has indicated sufficient lot widths and area to meet the typical minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance also typically requires a planned residential development to contain a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of the site to be developed as common green space and a minimum of 500 square feet of private open space per lot. The applicant is not proposing the development of common open space but each of the lots will have a minimum of 1,750 square feet of private open 4 FILE NO.: Z-7954 (Cont.) space. Staff feels this is sufficient to meet the open space needs of the new homes. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request. The applicant is proposing the development of this 0.69 acre site with five zero lot line single-family lots resulting in a density of 7.2 units per acre. The applicant has indicated the maximum square footage of the homes will be 1,685 square feet and the minimum square footage of the homes will be 1,450 square feet of heated and cooled space with a single -car garage. The applicant has indicated the homes will be developed as owner occupied housing and be constructed with brick or brick and vinyl siding. Staff feels the proposed development is appropriate for the location. To staffs knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. Staff feels the proposed development will meet a need for affordable quality housing as an in -fill development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions and comments as noted in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the above agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 10, 2005) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the request. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Mr. Pat McGetrick stated the applicant was single-family development. He stated each He stated the units would average 1600 sc stated he did not feel the traffic on Donna result of the development. proposing the development of the site as a unit would be sold as a single-family home. uare feet of heated and cooled space. He Drive would be significantly increased as a Mr. Gary Hutcheson addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated there were 15 homes located on Donna Drive and the developer was proposing to add five additional homes to the site. He stated the proposed development did not allow areas for children to play since the lots were relatively small. He stated he felt the development too intense for the area. Ms. Mary Hutcheson addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. She stated the area was primarily elderly reside stated the area was now the old west Little Roc at 35 -feet from West Markham Street which in she had walked to the post office in the past and Markham. She stated the traffic in the area ba the mornings making it impossible to travel east. 5 nts and couples without children. She k. She stated the units were proposed her opinion was very close. She stated the cars traveled very fast down West bac up from Barrow to Donna Drive in She stated it was also very difficult to FILE NO.: Z-7954 (Cont. exit Donna Drive to travel west since the volume of traffic in the area both east and west bound was great. She stated the development was too intense for the area. She stated the site would accommodate two homes but not the five as being proposed. Ms. Kathleen Oleson addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. She stated the development was adding a substantial number of units to the site. She stated the Commission should consider the request and the impact on the adjoining properties prior to approving the development as proposed. Mr. Walter Binz addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated his property adjoined the proposed development. He stated Donna Drive was 270 feet long and ended in a cul-de-sac. He stated the developer was proposing a 20 percent increase in the number of homes located on Donna Drive. He stated traffic in the mornings was a concern in the morning. He stated turning left was very difficult. He stated based on the design of the subdivision there was nowhere for the children to play except on the street. He stated Donna Drive was not a street for children to be playing on based on the traffic and the speed of the traffic. Ms. Anita Spence addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated her family lived on Donna Drive. She stated the proposed development of the site with zero lot line patio homes was out of character for the area. She stated there were appropriate locations for developments as proposed but this was not the area for this type development. She stated she felt two homes were appropriate for the site, which would allow yard area. She stated the proposed development was not a benefit to the neighborhood only the developer. Mr. Charles Ready addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated the lived on Donna Drive since 1967. He stated he took his grandchildren to school four mornings per week and he exited the subdivision going westbound. He stated this was a very difficult turn since the traffic on West Markham was very heavy and traveling very fast. He stated he felt the site should be left, as was currently platted. Mr. John McCormick stated he was the developer of the site. He stated the homes would range in size from 1400 square feet to 1600 square feet and priced around $100 per square foot. He stated the units would be single -story units and be constructed of brick, brick and stucco with some stone fronts. He stated the construction materials would be consistent with other homes in the area. He stated the development was for one-story patio homes with the target market 55 plus and empty nesters. There was a general discussion concerning the proposed development and the appropriateness of the development for the area. A motion was made to approve the request. The motion failed by a vote of 4 ayes, 5 noes and 2 absent. C. November 10, 2005 ITEM NO.: 21 FILE NO,: Z-7954 NAME: McCormick Short -form PD -R LOCATION: Located on the Southeast corner of West Markham Street and Donna Drive DEVELOPER: John McCormick 2608 West 7th Street Little Rock, AR 72205 ENGINEER: McGetrick and McGetrick Engineers 10 Otter Creek Court, Suite A Little Rock, AR 72210 AREA: 0.69 acres CURRENT ZONING: ALLOWED USES PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED USE: NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 R-2, Single-family Single-family residential -e - FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF Single-family — Zero Lot Line Residential VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED A. PROPOSAUREQUEST: None requested. The applicant is proposing the rezoning of this 0.69 acre site from R-2, Single- family to PD -R to allow development of the site with five zero lot line single-family homes. Three of the homes will front on West Markham Street and two of the homes will front on Donna Drive. The applicant has indicated an average lot size of 5,680 square feet. The applicant has also proposed the maximum square footage of the homes proposed as 1,685 and a minimum square footage of 1,450 square feet of heated and cooled space. The units are proposed with a single - car garage. November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7954 B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site contains an existing single-family structure facing West Markham Street. There are single-family homes located along West Markham Street to the North, East and West of the site. There are also single-family homes located to the south of the site, abutting Donna Drive. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received several informational phone calls from area residents. The Santa Fe Heights Neighborhood Association, all property owners located within 200 -feet of the site and all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Public Works Conditions: 1. Markham Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial with special design standards. A dedication of right-of-way 35 feet from centerline will be required. 2. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 3. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 4. Close old curb cuts. 5. Due to safety concerns and traffic volumes on Markham Street of 21,000 trips per day in 2003, no access is allowed on Markham Street. Access should be taken on Donna Drive instead. 6. A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Markham Street and Donna Drive. 7. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield) for more information. 8. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm water detention facilities on the plan. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements, if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. 2 November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7954 Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: No comment received. SBC: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3700 for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #5 — West Markham Bus Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the Rodney Parham Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this property. The applicant has applied for a Planned Residential Development for the creation of five single family detached homes.. The proposal does not have a significant impact on the Land Use Plan, which would necessitate a Plan Amendment. This project area is small in scale and the uses are similar to the surrounding uses of single-family houses. Master Street Plan: West Markham Street is shown as a Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan and Donna Drive is shown as a Local Street. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Markham is built to a four -lane section and Donna Drive is built to a two-lane section. Bicycle Plan: The closest bikeway to the site is along Rock Creek just north of the 1-630 freeway. It is about one-quarter of a mile to the south of the application. A Class One bikeway is totally separated from the automobile lanes. 3 November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7954 City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the West Markham Neighborhood Action Plan. The Infrastructure goal listed objectives of "Have Neighborhood Associations lobby the city to not grant variances for sidewalk construction requirements for any redevelopment or new construction in the neighborhood" and "Seek federal enhancement moneys for sidewalk construction along arterials. The Housing Goal listed objectives and action statements of "Increase the amount of owner occupied homes in the area" and "Market the are to young families with children. A.) Low market values encourage investment in rental properties. B.) Keep property values up." Landscape: No comment. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (October 20, 2005) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the applicant. Staff presented an overview of the proposed development indicating there were additional items necessary to complete the review process. Staff questioned if there were utilities located in the indicated 15 -foot easement. Mr. McGetrick stated he was not aware of any utilities within the easement but felt the development could be designed without the abandonment of the easement. Staff stated the proposed site plan included the placement of three drives along West Markham Street. Staff stated they were not supportive of the proposed driveway locations. Staff suggested Mr. McGetrick relocate the drives to Donna Drive. Public Works comments were addressed. Staff stated all old curb cuts would be required to be closed. Staff also stated the storm water detention ordinance would not apply to the proposed development due to the total land area being less than one acre. Staff noted comments from the various other reporting departments and agencies; suggesting the applicant contact them individually for further clarification. There was no further discussion of the item and the Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff addressing most of the issues raised at the October 20, 2005, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant has indicated a single drive to the proposed development from Donna Drive. Each of the units will be rear loaded with a cross access easement for the drive. 4 November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7954 The applicant has indicated the development of the proposed lots with a 25 -foot building line adjacent to Donna Drive and a 35 -foot building line adjacent to West Markham Street. The applicant has proposed a minimum lot width of 40 -feet and a minimum lot area of 5,260 square feet. The applicant is proposing the development of the lots as a zero lot line single-family development. The ordinance typically requires a minimum lot width of 40 -feet and a minimum lot area of 4,000 square feet. The applicant has indicated sufficient lot widths and area to meet the typical minimum requirements. The zoning ordinance also typically requires a planned residential development to contain a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of the site to be developed as common green space and a minimum of 500 square feet of private open space per lot. The applicant is not proposing the development of common open space but each of the lots will have a minimum of 1,750 square feet of private open space. Staff feels this is sufficient to meet the open space needs of the new homes. Staff is supportive of the applicant's request. The applicant is proposing the development of this 0.69 acre site with five zero lot line single-family lots resulting in a density of 7.2 units per acre. The applicant has indicated the maximum square footage of the homes will be 1,685 square feet and the minimum square footage of the homes will be 1,450 square feet of heated and cooled space with a single -car garage. The applicant has indicated the homes will be developed as owner occupied housing and be constructed with brick or brick and vinyl siding. Staff feels the proposed development is appropriate for the location. To staff's knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. Staff feels the proposed development will meet a need for affordable quality housing as an in -fill development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request subject to compliance with the conditions and comments as noted in paragraphs D, E, F and H of the above agenda staff report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 10, 2005) Mr. Pat McGetrick was present representing the request. There were registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the request subject to compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in paragraphs D, E and F of the agenda staff report. Mr. Pat McGetrick stated the applicant was proposing the development of the site as a single-family development. He stated each unit would be sold as a single-family home. 5 November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7954 He stated the units would average 1600 square feet of heated and cooled space. He stated he did not feel the traffic on Donna Drive would be significantly increased as a result of the development. Mr. Gary Hutcheson addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. He stated there were 15 homes located on Donna Drive and the developer was proposing to add five additional homes to the site. He stated the proposed development did not allow areas for children to play since the lots were relatively small. He stated he felt the development too intense for the area. Ms. Mary Hutcheson addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. She stated the area was primarily elderly residents and couples without children. She stated the area was now the old west Little Rock. She stated the units were proposed at 35 -feet from West Markham Street which in her opinion was very close. She stated she had walked to the post office in the past and the cars traveled very fast down West Markham. She stated the traffic in the area backed up from Barrow to Donna Drive in the mornings making it impossible to travel east. She stated it was also very difficult to exit Donna Drive to travel west since the volume of traffic in the area both east and west bound was great. She stated the development was too intense for the area. She stated the site would accommodate two homes but not the five as being proposed. Ms. Kathleen Oleson addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. She stated the development was adding a substantial number of units to the site. She stated the Commission should consider the request and the impact on the adjoining properties prior to approving the development as proposed. Mr. Walter Binz addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated his property adjoined the proposed development. He stated Donna Drive was 270 feet long and ended in a cul-de-sac. He stated the developer was proposing a 20 percent increase in the number of homes located on Donna Drive. He stated traffic in the mornings was a concern in the morning. He stated turning left was very difficult. He stated based on the design of the subdivision there was nowhere for the children to play except on the street. He stated Donna Drive was not a street for children to be playing on based on the traffic and the speed of the traffic. Ms. Anita Spence addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated her family lived on Donna Drive. She stated the proposed development of the site with zero lot line patio homes was out of character for the area. She stated there were appropriate locations for developments as proposed but this was not the area for this type development. She stated she felt two homes were appropriate for the site, which would allow yard area. She stated the proposed development was not a benefit to the neighborhood only the developer. Mr. Charles Ready addressed the Commission in opposition of the proposed request. He stated the lived on Donna Drive since 1967. He stated he took his grandchildren to D November 10, 2005 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 21 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7954 school four mornings per week and he exited the subdivision going westbound. He stated this was a very difficult turn since the traffic on West Markham was very heavy and traveling very fast. He stated he felt the site should be left, as was currently platted. Mr. John McCormick stated he was the developer of the site. He stated the homes would range in size from 1400 square feet to 1600 square feet and priced around $100 per square foot. He stated the units would be single -story units and be constructed of brick, brick and stucco with some stone fronts. He stated the construction materials would be consistent with other homes in the area. He stated the development was for one-story patio homes with the target market 55 plus and empty nesters. There was a general discussion concerning the proposed development and the appropriateness of the development for the area. A motion was made to approve the request. The motion failed by a vote of 4 ayes, 5 noes and 2 absent. 7 ITEM NO.: 21. NAME: McCormick Short -form PD -R FILE NO.: Z-7954 LOCATION: located on the Southeast corner of West Markham Street and Donna Drive Plannina Staff Comments: 1. Provide notification of property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. 2. Staff questions the usability of the indicated lots and drives along West Markham Street. The lots indicate a single driveway and a single garage. The layout does not lend itself to parking and there are no other alternatives for parking along West Markham Street. 3. Is there anything located in the 15 -foot easement? If not consider revising the site plan to include this area. Staff would recommend the lots be reoriented to face Donna Drive and a two car driveway be placed for each of the units. There is limited street parking in the area and the site is located near the intersection. Variance/Waivers: tc e;! L•- Public Works Conditions: 1. Markham Street is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial with special design standards. A dedication of right-of-way 35 feet from centerline will be required. 2. With site development, provide design of street conforming to the Master Street Plan. Construct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development. 3. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 4. Close old curb cuts. 5. Due to safety concerns and traffic volumes on Markham Street of 21,000 trips per day in 2003, no access is allowed on Markham Street. Access should be taken on Donna Drive instead. 6. A 20 feet radial dedication of right-of-way is required at the intersection of Markham Street and Donna Drive. 7. Obtain permits prior to doing any street cuts or curb cuts. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way. Contact Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield) for more information. Storm water detention ordinance applies to this property. Show the proposed location for storm w ter detention facilities on the plan. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: Sewer main extension required, with easements, if service is required for the project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility at 688-1414 for additional information. Entergy: Center -Point Enemy: SBC: Central Arkansas Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of the meter connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This development will have minor impact on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to provide adequate pressure and fire protection. Fire Department: Place fire hydrants per code. Contact the Little Rock Fire Department at 918-3700 for additional information. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located near CATA Bus Route #5 — West Markham Bus Route. Planning Division: Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plan (to include the additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, October 26, 2005.