Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7924 Staff AnalysisSEPTEMBER 26, 2005 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Z-7924 Owner: William David Spivey Address: #1 Rocky Valley Cove Description: Lot 1, Pleasant Valley Manor Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence provisions of Section 36-516 to allow a fence which exceeds the maximum height allowed. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at #1 Rocky Valley Cove is occupied by a two-story brick and frame single family residence. The property is located at the northeast corner of Rocky Valley Cove and Rocky Valley Drive. There is a two -car wide driveway from Rocky Valley Drive. The applicant recently constructed an eight (8) foot high wood fence along a portion of the rear (east) property line, as noted on the attached site plan. There is approximately 70 linear feet of fence along the rear property line. The fence does not extend across the platted building lines along Rocky Valley Cove and Rocky Valley Drive. Section 36-516(e)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence height of six (6) feet in residential zoning. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the new eight (8) foot high wood fence. SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 aWkA104 Eel A 11111115141610 0 0 Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as reasonable. The applicant notes in the attached cover letter that the fence is needed to help buffer the rear yard area from light and noise generated by the Wilson Water Treatment Plant located to the south and southeast along Interstate 430. Additionally, the west wall of the single family residence immediately to the east has no window or door openings. Therefore, the requested fence height will not create any natural lighting problems for that residence. Staff believes the proposed fence will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested fence height variance, subject to a building permit being obtained for the fence construction. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (SEPTEMBER 26, 2005) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. 2