Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7827 Staff AnalysisAPRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 8 File No.: Z-7827 Owner: Janie Boyce Applicant: James Scroggins Address: 1620 North Jackson Street Description: Lot 76, Cliffewood Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow a building addition with reduced side and rear setbacks. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analvsis: The R-2 zoned property at 1620 N. Jackson Street is occupied by a one- story brick and frame single family residence. There is a one -car wide driveway from Jackson Street which serves as access. There is a one- story frame garage near the northwest corner of the property. The applicant proposes to remove the garage structure from the property and construct a two-story addition to the house, as noted on the attached site plan. The proposed addition will be slightly wider than the house, with a side setback (south side) of approximately 1.5 feet at the southwest corner of the addition. The addition will be set back approximately 12 to 14 feet from the rear (west) property line. The applicant has noted that the addition will include a master bedroom/bath APRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 8 CON'T. and a two -car garage. The applicant has also noted that the addition will be constructed to match the existing home's architecture. Section 36-254(d)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum side setback of five (5) feet for this 50 foot wide lot (as measured at the front building line). Section 36-254(d)(3) requires a minimum rear setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the proposed addition. Staff does not support the variances, as requested. Although staff has no problem with the requested rear setback variance, staff cannot support the requested side setback. Staff feels that a 1.5 foot side setback is not enough for a two-story structure. Staff would support a side setback variance if the applicant revised the site plan, making the proposed addition the same width as the house. This would result in a side setback of approximately four (4) feet at the addition's southwest corner. Staff feels that this would provide adequate separation between the structure and the abutting property to the south. If the applicant were willing to make the revision as noted above, staff would support the application with the following conditions: 1. The addition must be constructed to match the existing house. 2. Guttering must be provided (if necessary) to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent property to the south. 3. No accessory building(s) will be allowed to be constructed on the property. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the requested variances, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 25, 2005) Staff informed the Board that the applicant revised the application to make the proposed addition the same width as the existing house, resulting in a 3.5 to 4 foot side setback at its southwest corner. Staff recommended approval of the revised application, subject to the following conditions: 1. The addition must be constructed to match the existing house. 2 APRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 8 ICON'T. 2. Guttering must be provided (if necessary) to prevent water run-off onto the adjacent property to the south. 3. No accessory building(s) will be allowed to be constructed on the property. The revised application was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. 3