Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7777 Staff AnalysisJANUARY 31, 2005 ITEM NO.: 10 File No.: Z-7777 Owner: Brian and Tiffany Reddick Address: 46 Edgehill Road Description: Lot 52, Edgehill Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence/wall provisions of Section 36-516 to allow a masonry wall which exceeds the maximum height allowed. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 46 Edgehill Road is occupied by a two-story frame single family residence which is currently being remodeled. There is a one -car wide drive at the southeast corner of the property which serves as access. As part of the remodeling project, a new masonry wall has been constructed along a portion of the west property line. The new wall section runs for approximately 86 feet on the property line along the side of the house. The wall ranges in height from seven (7) to eight (8) feet above grade. Section 36-516(e)(1)a. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum fence/wall height of six (6) feet for fences along property lines in residential zoning. Therefore, the applicants are requesting a variance from this ordinance standard to allow the 7 to 8 foot high masonry wall. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as relatively minor. The wall as constructed is not out of character with other fences/walls in this general area. Staff typically supports fence/wall heights in JANUARY 31, 2005 I[: I►y,104 Eel i[INIOTi104W9 single family zoning up to eight (8) feet, as long as there are no unusual circumstances associated with them. This is the case with this proposed wall. The 7 to 8 foot height is as measured from the inside of the wall. The grade of the neighboring property on the west side of the wall is slightly higher than the grade inside the wall. Staff feels that the masonry wall will have no negative impact on the adjacent property or the general area. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested wall height variance, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JANUARY 31, 2005) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 2