Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7716 Staff AnalysisSEPTEMBER 27, 2004 ITEM NO.: 6 File No.: Z-7716 Owner: Edward and Laurie David Address: 1615 Rebsamen Park Road Description: East side of Rebsamen Park Road, North of Old Cantrell Road Zoned: 1-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the parking provisions of Section 36-502 to allow a reduced number of parking spaces associated with a restaurant use. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: Vacant Commercial Building Restaurant 1. The three parking spaces fronting on Rebsamen Park Road are partially within the public right-of-way. In addition, these spaces back out into the traffic lanes creating a hazard. These spaces should be eliminated by constructing curb, gutter and sidewalk across the property frontage to match improvements to the north. B. Staff Analysis: The 1-2 zoned property at 1615 Rebsamen Park Road is occupied by a split level masonry commercial building which is currently vacant and being remodeled. The building once housed a restaurant. There is a driveway from Rebsamen Park Road at the northwest corner of the property, which serves as access to a paved parking lot behind (east side) the commercial building. There are three (3) head -in parking spaces in front of the building along Rebsamen Park Road. There is a total of 17 parking spaces on the site. SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 ITEM NO.: 6 (CON'T.) The applicants are in the process of remodeling the commercial building for use as a restaurant or banquet facility. Section 36-502(b)(3)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 20 on-site parking spaces for use of this 2,000 square foot building as a restaurant. Therefore, the applicants are requesting a variance from this ordinance requirement. As noted previously, there is a total of 17 on-site parking spaces at 1615 Rebsamen Park Road. The owner of this property also owns the restaurant building immediately to the north, and holds a long-term lease on the 58 space parking lot to the west across Rebsamen Park Road. The parking lot lease has options through 2015, with foregoing options renewing automatically thereafter. Therefore, a total of 75 parking spaces exists for the two (2) restaurants. Section 36- 502(b)(3)c. would require a total of 65 on-site parking spaces for the two (2) restaurants combined. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff feels that the request is reasonable based on the long-term lease the property owner holds on the 58 space parking lot across Rebsamen Park Road. The building at 1615 Rebsamen Park Road has a long history of being occupied as a restaurant, with a shared parking arrangement. The 58 space parking lot across Rebsamen Park Road has been part of the shared parking arrangement for restaurants in this area for a number of years. Staff feels that the use of the building at 1615 Rebsamen Park Road as a restaurant with the parking arrangement as proposed by the applicant will have no adverse impact on the general area. As noted in paragraph A. of this report, Public Works will require that the three (3) head -in parking spaces in front of the building be eliminated, with construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk across the street frontage of the property. The applicant will need to work with the Public Works Department on this issue. The two (2) restaurant buildings immediately to the north have eliminated similar head -in parking in recent years. C. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the requested parking variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the Public Works requirement as noted in paragraph A. of this report. 2. The lease for the parking area across Rebsamen Park Road to the west must be maintained. 2 SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 ITEM NO.: 6 (CON'T BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (SEPTEMBER 27, 2004) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered not additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. 3