Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7605-D Application 1Carney, Dana From: Jake Nesselrodt <jake.nesselrodt@national-te.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 9:30 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Chevaux Office Park Rezoning Good Morning, Dana — Per our discussion this morning, we would like to request the complete application package for the rezoning of Chevaux Office Park (Z -7605-D), and any supporting documents not available online, if any. Please let me know if any additional information is needed from me. Thank you, Jake Nesselrodt Director of Operations f National Title & Escrow, LLC 1526 W. Business Hwy 60 Dexter, MO 63841 T: 573.624.9990 x143 F: 573.624.9995 iake.nesseiradt@national-te.com www.natiorial-te.com I Linkedln 1 PCD . R2 CUP MF18 a � CUP 02 [R2 PCD MF18 C3 mv� ��yQR POD C2 THIS SITE R2 01 CAINV rCD ❑ ° POD O� 03 Q OS O 03 OCG U U O U Q LU a U� 2 0 HpF� MF12 i � � 'D 02 0�'] cD C�-{EVAUX:CiR� �fGE h1LA CT � �������LJLnJ F - Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case- Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward: 5 N PD: 19 CT: 42.12 o 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet PI so �GEI�gIV'CT J PI CD MOc RH CRL c n�L. V 1 _ THIS SITE Land Use Plan City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case: Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward- 5 N PD: 19 CT: 42.12 0 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet oEVELOM TO LONffil61cr — _ s WDE wwc rR R�17p 1 y ` 4200 SF 4 LVVSWE Mn ~ +� LOT 1R - ~ BANCORP . 1' SOUTH I] LOT 8000 SF _Z0 �� � TNIalOU� FS 1Nr14UN S= MO"eu SM �, IVL011E0 BY NGWAY 16 WEA REnuutExDM wxiol WAHLQUIST INSURANCE i MANAGEMENT COMPANY ! 4200 SF 4200 SF _J LOT 5 LOT 6 e r�xc Sketch City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case No: Z -7605-D Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Title: Short -form PCD N A PCD CO) R2 01 D 03 �MF12 j� jGFLAi� CT J PCD R2CUP ff MF18 CUP 02 MF18 POD C2 THIS SITE J CN� PCG a POD �O 03 Doo os C3o O I V R 2 r i'Dyc��M EE 42co 0 I� Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case: Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward: 5 N PD: 19 CT: 42.12 0 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet r v PI / MOC RK URL V GEL�C�' Land Use Plan City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case: Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward: 5 N PD: 19 CT: 42.12 0 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet DEVELOPER TO COH3R= S WIDE WALK 40 CONCRETE DF4VEWAY 7URNM A9 _ PFR WFD RE4UEiE AMM EAA,%I�YIIN SRE mormEla REAIUIMMEMM ("Qfi LOT 1R BANCORP SOUTH 4000 SF- , LOT 8000 SF s 7� Sketch City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case No: Z -7505-D Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park Location: 17705 Cantrell Road I Title: Short -form IACD N A SF AHLQUIST MANAGEMENT .i INSURANCE4200 NY COMPANY CORP. 4200 SF l - 4200 SF j 4 LOTS__ LOT 6 7� Sketch City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case No: Z -7505-D Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park Location: 17705 Cantrell Road I Title: Short -form IACD N A w 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1111111111111111111 2019055775 PRESENTED: 0945-209 0"8:24A"RECORDED: 09-05-2019 ()8'46:01 AM In official Records o1 Terrl Hollingsworth Circuil/Counry Clerk ORDINANCE NO.21,7lZ3LASKI CO. AR FEE $20.00 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISH A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TITLED LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK SHORT -FORM PCD, LOCATED AT 17705 CANTRELL ROAD (Z -7605-D), LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. Section 1. That the zoning classification of the following described property be changed from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District: Z -7605-D: Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. Section 2. That the preliminary site development plan/plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning Commission. Section 3. That the change in zoning classification contemplated for Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -Form PCD, located at 17705 Cantrell Road (Z -7605-D), is conditioned upon obtaining final plan approval within the time specified by Chapter 36, Article VII, Section 36-454 (e) of the Code of Ordinances. Section 4. That this ordinance shall not take effect and be in full force until the final plan approval. Section 5. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and Designated District Map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof. Section 6. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. Section 7. Repealed All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same that are inconsistent with <<.uu +,ur,rn..r the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. `,�'t�t Calle''■a, PASSED: Se tember 3, 2019 ` P "+• [Page 1 of 21 5 &I , f S P LAS*'+•' 111 ' ran nynu+ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 usan a ey, Ci Clerk APPR VE S LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorn /! !! // // // // // // // // // // // // // // APPROVED: Prank S&M Jr., Ma r [Page 2 of 21 Area Zoning City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case: Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward: 5 N PD: 19 A CT. 42A2 p 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet Land Use Plan City of Little Rock Planning & Development Case: Z -7605-D Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Ward: 5 N PD: 19 A CT: 42.12 0 200 400 TRS: T2N R14W 14 Feet Case No: Z -7605-D Title: Short -form PCD Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park N Location: 17705 Cantrell Road A OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 AGENDA Subject An Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Planned Zoning District titled Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17,705 Cantrell Road. (Z -7605-D) Submitted by: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT RECOMMENDATION BACKGROUND Action Required gOrdinance Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce T. Moore The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial for a Planned Commercial Development located at 17,705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park. I None. Staff recommends approval of the requested PCD zoning. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the PCD zoning by a vote of 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. Ordinance No. 19,098 established Chevaux Short -form POD on May 18, 2004. That approval included a single "L" shaped, 33,600 square foot building and 142 parking spaces. Uses were those allowed in the 0-3 zoning district, with 10% of the building being allowed the 0-3 accessory uses. Ordinance No. 18,451 adopted on December 5, 2005 revised the POD to allow the creation of seven lots with an BACKGROUND CONTINUED individual smaller building on each lot. A total of 108 parking spaces were proposed. The allowable uses were those in the 0-3 zoning district, not including the 10% accessory uses. Ordinance No. 19, 604 adopted on October 3, 2006 further revised the POD to allow the two front lots to be combined into one lot for development of a branch bank. No other changes to the overall POD were proposed. The applicant is requesting approval of PCD zoning for the two middle lots, Lots 2 and 3, to allow for combining those two lots into one lot in order to construct a single, 8,000 square foot building. The use mix proposed for this building is as follows: a. Office space, 2,000 sq. ft., 7 am — 7 pm, 5 days a week b. Fitness (therapy) center, 3,000 sq. ft., 5:30 am — 8 pm, 6 days a week c. Restaurant (no drive through and no outdoor dining), 3,000 sq. ft., 7 am —10 pm, 7 days a week The applicant has committed to placing the proposed restaurant use on the west end of the building and to installing additional screening trees along the eastern perimeter of the development where the site is adjacent to the Chevaux residential neighborhood. The proposed restaurant use represents approximately 12% of the square footage of office development allowed under the current POD. That is slightly more than the 10% ancillary restaurant use that would be allowed in a typical 0-3 zoned office development. The Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their July 18, 2019 meeting. There were numerous persons present in opposition from the abutting Chevaux neighborhood. Additionally, numerous e-mails of opposition had been sent to the commissioners and staff. The commission voted 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent to recommend denial. Please see the attached Commission minutes for the complete staff report and commission action. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TITLED LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK SHORT -FORM PCD, LOCATED AT 17,705 CANTRELL ROAD (Z -7605-D), CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the zoning classification of the following described property be changed from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District: (Z -7605-D) — Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. SECTION 2. That the preliminary site development plan/plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning Commission. SECTION 3. That the change in zoning classification contemplated for Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17,705 Cantrell Road (Z -7605-D) is conditioned upon obtaining final plan approval within the time specified by Chapter 36, Article VII, Section 36-454 (e) of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION 4. That this Ordinance shall not take effect and be in full force until the final plan approval. Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SECTION 5. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and designated district map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof. SECTION 6. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. SECTION 7. Repealed. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney H H H APPROVED: Mayor Page 2 of 2 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION AUGUST 20, 2019 AGENDA Subject A Resolution to set the date of public hearing for September 3, 2019 on an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Planned Zoning District titled Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17705 Cantrell Road. (Z -7605-D) Submitted By: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT Action Required Ordinance Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce Moore The applicant through Attorney Antwan Phillips has appealed the Planning Commission's denial of a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District to allow a mixed use building to be developed on that property. I None RECOMMENDATION ` Approval of the Resolution setting the public hearing : WO1601-CZ111IL On July 18, 2019, the Planning Commission denied a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to POD, Planned Commercial Development District. The vote was 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. The applicant is appealing that action to the Board of Directors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO SET SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 AS THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT TITLED LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK SHORT -FORM PCD (Z -7605-D), LOCATED AT 17705 CANTRELL ROAD; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, an application to rezone property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District, was denied in a 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent vote by the Little Rock Planning Commission on July 18, 2019; and WHEREAS, the applicant timely filed an appeal of this decision to the Little Rock Board of Directors; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. A public hearing shall be held on Tuesday, September 3, 2019, at 6:00 PM, or as soon afterwards as the item is reached upon the call of the Agenda, in the Board Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, on the question of whether to overturn the denial by the Little Rock Planning Commission of a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of such hearing in the manner prescribed by law by publication once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in Pulaski County, Arkansas, and having a general circulation in the City of Little Rock. SECTION 3. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this resolution is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the resolution which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional were not originally a part of the resolution. SECTION 4. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: ATTEST: Susan Langley, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 29 Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney 30 31 2 APPROVED: Frank Scott, Mayor Carney, Dana From: Amie C. Taylor <ataylor@wlj.com> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 2:27 PM To: Mayor Scott; Newson, Bridgitte; Langley, Susan; Carney, Dana Cc: Antwan Phillips Subject: Chevaux Office Park Rezoning Application Case File No. Z-7605 Attachments: DOCS -#1901618 -v1 -Chevaux Office Park - 2019_07_22 - Letter to Mayor Scott.pdf Good afternoon, Please see attached correspondence from Antwan Phillips on the above referenced case file. Thank you, Amie 0 = Amie C. Taylor Assistant 501.212.1320 I.ataylor@wti.com Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 1 Little Rock, AR 72201 Main 501.371.08081 Fax 501.376.9442 1 wli.com ril WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 Little Rock, AR 72201-3699 Main 501,371.0808 Fax 501.376.9442 wlj.com Antwan D. Phillips ATTORNEY Direct: 501.212.12711 aphillips@wlj.com July 22, 2019 (VIA Email: mayorscott@littlerock.gou and bnewson@littleroch_. vv Mayor Frank Scott, Jr. Office of the Mayor 500 West Markham Street, Room 203 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Chevaux Office Park Rezoning Application Case File No. Z-7605 Dear Mayor Scott: My firm represents the applicant in the above -referenced rezoning application. On July 18, 2019, the rezoning application was heard by the Planning Commission. There were only 8 commissioners present to hear and vote on the application. After the presentations, the Planning Commission voted 5 to 3 in favor of granting the rezoning application. However, the application failed because it did not get the required 6 votes to approve the application. Consequently, the application is deemed to be denied. For your reference, I have attached a copy of the application. As a result, my client is exercising its right to appeal the rezoning application to the City Board of Directors. Therefore, please accept this correspondence as my request that the above -referenced rezoning application be placed on the City Board of Directors' Meeting Agenda as soon as possible. To ensure that the City Clerk and Planning Department are aware of this appeal request, I have copied both Susan Langley and Dana Carney on this correspondence. Please advise if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks. Sincerely, WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP xvv4i ci4 Antwan D. Phillips Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS July 22, 2019 Page 2 ADP:act Enclosures cc: Susan Langley (slangley@littlerock.gov Dana Carney (dcarney@littlerock.gov) City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 July 25, 2019 Antwan Phillips Wright Lindsey Jennings 200 W. Capitol Ave., Suite 2300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD (Z -7605-D) Dear Mr. Phillips: I have received your letter in which you state your desire to appeal the Planning Commission's denial of the referenced PCD application. The item will be placed on the Board of Director's August 20, 2019 Agenda to set the date of public hearing for September 3, 2019. Board of Directors meetings are held in the Board Room, Second Floor, City Hall, 500 West Markham. The meetings begin at 6:00 p.m. As the appellant, you are responsible for notification of the public hearing. You must send a notice to all record objectors and all parties who were notified of the Planning Commission hearing. I have included a notice form for your use. In addition to the list from the abstract company, you need to notify the neighborhood associations and record participants. I have attached that additional list. Do not send the notice until after the August 20, 2019 Board meeting to be sure that the public hearing is set for September 3, 2019. The notices do need to be sent via certified mail no later than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. Proof of notice, as for the Commission meeting, must be returned to me no later than the Friday prior to the date of the public hearing. Failure to comply with the notice requirement as stated above will result in withdrawal of the appeal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 371-6817 or dcarney@littlerock.gov. Sincerely, 4 Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager cc: Jamie Collins, Director of Planning and Development Susan Langley, City Clerk In addition to those on the abstract company list, send notice to the following Neighborhood Associations and record participants: Cindy Boyle 5914 Stonewall Little Rock, AR 72207 Sandra Cobb 5704 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Bill Sutton 43 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Gary Parritt 53 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Sue Auffert 91 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Steve Giles 425 West capitol Avenue, Suite 3700 Little Rock, AR 72223 Bayonne Place NH Association John Carter P. 0. Box 242414 Little Rock, AR 72223 Chevaux Court NH Association Frances Stuettgen 85 Chevaux Circle Little Rock AR 72223 Aberdeen Court NH Association Christopher Benton P. 0. Box 241992 Little Rock, AR 72223 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON AN APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT TO ALL owners of land lying adjacent to (including across the street from) the boundary of the property located at: Address: General Location: Owned By: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property requesting a change of classification from District to District has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing on said application will be held by the Little Rock Board of Directors in the Board of Directors Chambers, Second Floor, City Hall on at ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY APPEAR and be heard at said time and place, or may notify the Board of Directors of their view on this matter by letter. All persons interested in this request are invited to call or visit the Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham Street, 371-4790, and to review the application and discuss same with the Planning staff. AFFIDAVIT I herby certify that I have notified all the property owners of record within 200 feet of the above property that subject property is being considered for rezoning and that a Public Hearing will be held by the Little Rock Board of Directors at the time and place described above. Applicant (Owner of Authorized Agent (Name) (Date) OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION AUGUST 20, 2019 AGENDA Subject A Resolution to set the date of public hearing for September 3, 2019 on an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Planned Zoning District titled Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17705 Cantrell Road. (Z -7605-D) Submitted By: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT Action Required Ordinance �Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce Moore The applicant through Attorney Antwan Phillips has appealed the Planning Commission's denial of a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District to allow a mixed use building to be developed on that property. I None RECOMMENDATION I Approval of the Resolution setting the public hearing BACKGROUND On July 18, 2019, the Planning Commission denied a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to POD, Planned Commercial Development District. The vote was 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. The applicant is appealing that action to the Board of Directors. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO SET SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 AS THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT TITLED LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK SHORT -FORM PCD (Z -7605-D), LOCATED AT 17705 CANTRELL ROAD; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, an application to rezone property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District, was denied in a 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent vote by the Little Rock Planning Commission on July 18, 2019; and WHEREAS, the applicant timely filed an appeal of this decision to the Little Rock Board of Directors; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. A public hearing shall be held on Tuesday, September 3, 2019, at 6:00 PM, or as soon afterwards as the item is reached upon the call of the Agenda, in the Board Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas, on the question of whether to overturn the denial by the Little Rock Planning Commission of a request to rezone the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of such hearing in the manner prescribed by law by publication once a week for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in Pulaski County, Arkansas, and having a general circulation in the City of Little Rock. Section 3. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this resolution is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the resolution which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional were not originally a part of the resolution. Section 4. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: 19 ATTEST: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Susan Langley, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney 2 APPROVED: Frank Scott, Mayor BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 AGENDA Subject An Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a Planned Zoning District titled Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17,705 Cantrell Road (Z -7605-D) Submitted by: Department of Planning and Development SYNOPSIS FISCAL IMPACT RECOMMENDATION Action Required gOrdinance Resolution Approval Information Report Approved By Bruce T. Moore The applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial for a Planned Commercial Development located at 17,705 Cantrell Road, described as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park. None. Staff recommends approval of the requested PCD zoning. The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the PCD zoning by a vote of 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. BACKGROUND Ordinance No. 19,098 established Chevaux Short -form POD on May 18, 2004. That approval included a single "L" shaped, 33,600 square foot building and 142 parking spaces. Uses were those allowed in the 0-3 zoning district, with 10% of the building being allowed the 0-3 accessory uses. Ordinance No. 18,451 adopted on December 5, 2005 revised the POD to allow the creation of seven lots with an individual smaller building on each lot. A total of 108 parking spaces were proposed. The allowable uses were those in the 0-3 zoning district, not including the 10% accessory uses. Ordinance No. 19, 604 adopted on October 3, 2006 further revised the POD to allow the two front lots to be combined into one lot for development of a branch bank. No other changes to the overall POD were proposed. The applicant is requesting approval of PCD zoning for the two middle lots, Lots 2 and 3, to allow for combining those two lots into one lot in order to construct a single, 8,000 square foot building. The use mix proposed for this building is as follows: a. Office space, 2,000 sq. ft., 7 am — 7 pm, 5 days a week b. Fitness (therapy) center, 3,000 sq. ft., 5:30 am — 8 pm, 6 days a week c. Restaurant (no drive through and no outdoor dining), 3,000 sq. ft., 7 am — 10 pm, 7 days a week The applicant has committed to placing the proposed restaurant use on the west end of the building and to installing additional screening trees along the eastern perimeter of the development where the site is adjacent to the Chevaux residential neighborhood. The proposed restaurant use represents approximately 12% of the square footage of office development allowed under the current POD. That is slightly more than the 10% ancillary restaurant use that would be allowed in a typical 0-3 zoned office development. The Planning Commission reviewed this matter at their July 18, 2019 meeting. There were numerous persons present in opposition from the abutting Chevaux neighborhood. Additionally, numerous e-mails of opposition had been sent to the commissioners and staff. The commission voted 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent to recommend denial. Please see the attached Commission minutes for the complete staff report and commission action. BACKGROUND CONTINUED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TITLED LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK SHORT -FORM PCD, LOCATED AT 17,705 CANTRELL ROAD (Z -7605-D), CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That the zoning classification of the following described property be changed from POD, Planned Office Development District, to PCD, Planned Commercial Development District: (Z -7605-D) — Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. SECTION 2. That the preliminary site development plan/plat be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning Commission. SECTION 3. That the change in zoning classification contemplated for Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD, located at 17,705 Cantrell Road (Z -7605-D) is conditioned upon obtaining final plan approval within the time specified by Chapter 36, Article VII, Section 36-454 (e) of the Code of Ordinances. SECTION 4. That this Ordinance shall not take effect and be in full force until the final plan approval. Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SECTION 5. That the map referred to in Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and designated district map be and is hereby amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect and designate the change provided for in Section 1 hereof. SECTION 6. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. SECTION 7. Repealed. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. PASSED: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Page 2 of 2 taCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 June 19, 2019 Joe White White-Daters & Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Z -7605-D — Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD Dear Mr. White: This is to advise you that in connection with your request concerning the above referenced file number the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on June 6, 2019: Approved with conditions. Recommended approval with conditions. Recommended approval as submitted. Denied your request as submitted. X Deferred to the _July 18. 2019 Meeting. Other: If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, ,lex Koenig Z Development Administrator From the Desk of Dana Carney Zoning & Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock Critical Dates for applications before the Little Rock Planning Commission on an application for a Planned Zoning Development, Zoning or Subdivision Site Plan Review or Preliminary Plat approval for the April 25, 2019 public hearing: If a sign is required for the application request — the sign must be posted 30 -days prior to the public hearing. The sign must be posted on or before March 25, 2019. The sign is to remain posted for the entire review and approval process. If the sign is damaged or destroyed the applicant is responsible to replace the sign with a new sign provided by staff. Subdivision Committee Meeting: The meeting is at noon, City Hall Board Room, 500 West Markham Street, on April 03, 2019. You must attend or have a representative present. Any revisions or additional information requested at the Subdivision Committee meeting is to be returned to staff on or before Apriil 10, 2019. Notification of property owners as required by the Planning Commission By-laws are to be post marked on or before April 10, 2019 — Return proof of notice to me on or before April 19, 2019. The listing of persons/property owners must be obtained from a licensed abstract or title company. You must use the proper notice form which is included in the application package. Failure to provide proper notice will result in the deferral of your item for six (6) weeks. Public Hearing before the Little Rock Planning Commission is on April 25, 2019 at 4:00 pm. You or an authorized representative must be present. Items which require Board of Directors approval will be forwarded to the Board of Directors forfinal action on May 21, 2019 —This is not a firm date, the date of the hearing before the Board of Directors will be determined by the City Manager at his staff meeting on May 6, 2019. All ordinances are not in full effect until 30 -days after the Board of Directors acts on the request. Any questions or comments should be addressed to Dana Carney Zoning & Subdivision Manager 501.371.6817 dcarne iittlerock. ov PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: May 1, 2019 Joe White White-Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock. AR 72223 Re: Z -7605-D Lots 2 and 3 Chevaux Office Park Short -form PCD Dear Mr. White. Planning Zoning and Subdivision This is to advise you that in connection with your request concerning the above referenced file number the following action was taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 25, 2019, Approved with conditions. Recommended approval with conditions. Recommended approval as submitted. Denied your request as submitted. X Deferred to the June 6. 2019 Meeting. Othe r: If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6817 or at d ca rneyCaD_I ittle rockg ov. Respectfully, Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivision Manager DC/aa Carney, Dana From: Collins, Gilbert Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 9:55 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Attachments: <EXTERNAL>RE: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement From: Antwan Phillips <APhillips@wlj.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 2:13 PM To: Collins, Gilbert <gcollins@littlerock.gov> Subject: RE: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Jamie: My client has agreed to the terms. His email confirmation is attached. Please advise if/how this agreement impacts next Tuesday's hearing. From: Collins, Gilbert[mailto:acollins@littlerock.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 12:57 PM To: Antwan Phillips Subject: <EXTERNAL>RE: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Your client. Have they agreed to the terms/conditions listed in Mr. Giles's letter? From: Antwan Phillips <APhillips@wli,com> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 12:48 PM To: Collins, Gilbert <collins@littlerock.gov> Subject: RE: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement The owner as in my client? What exactly do you need? I'm sure I can get it. From: Collins, Gilbert [mailto:gcollins a� littlerock.gov] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 12:42 PM To: Antwan Phillips Subject: <EXTERNAL>Z-7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Antwan, Have you been able to get an official approval from the owner of the property for the attached. Jamie Collins, PE I Director City of Little Rock Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Phone: 501-371-6818 1 Fax: 501-399-3435 https:llwww,ll ittlerock.goov Carney, Dana From: Ryan Harper <ryan@harco.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 1:15 PM To: Antwan Phillips; Jwhite@whitedaters.com Subject: <EXTERNAL> RE: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Attachments: 2019-8-13 Itr to City Clerk.pdf Antwan, I agree and approve the attached letter, it address the items that Mr. Sutton and I have been negotiating and finally agreed upon. Ryan Harper Project Manager/ Estimator Harco Constructors Cell: 501-804-7206 Office: 501-791-0055 Fax: 501-791-0237 \A/\A/\A/ herrn nPt PO Box 13267 Maumelle, AR 72113 ARO -1 Building a future with you. Click the links above and follow us on Facebook and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with all the latest projects and updates. From: Antwan Phillips [mailto:APhillips@wlj.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 1:00 PM To: Ryan Harper <ryan@harco.net>; Jwhite@whitedaters.com Subject: FW: Z -7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Ryan See below. The City needs official approval from you regarding the agreement with the POA. Please advise that you are in agreement and I will share with the City. From: Collins, Gilbert [mailto.gcollins@littlerock.gavj Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 12:42 PM To: Antwan Phillips Subject: <EXTERNAL>Z-7605-D - Owner Approval of Agreement Antwan, 1 Have you been able to get an official approval from the owner of the property for the attached. Jamie Collins, PE Director City of Little Rock Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Phone: 501-371-6818 1 Fax: 501-399-3435 https://www.littlerock.govl DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC Ms. Susan Langley Little Rock City Clerk City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Chevaux Office Park PCD No. Z -7605-D Dear Ms. Langley: Our law firm represents the Chevaux Court POA that opposed the rezoning of Lots 2 and 3 of Chevaux Office Park at the Planning Commission meeting on July 18, 2019, resulting in a denial of the application to rezone. Subsequently an appeal was filed to the City Board of Directors concerning the above -referenced planning file number. Over the last few weeks Mr. Bill Sutton, the president of the Chevaux Court POA, and other POA homeowners have been negotiating with Mr. Ryan Harper, a representative of the applicant for the rezoning. The purpose of discussions was to try to come to an agreement whereby the POA would withdraw its opposition to the PCD if the applicant would install and maintain certain improvements on office park property to screen and buffer traffic noise and lights from the abutting homes and property of POA owners. We are pleased to announce that such an agreement has been reached in which the applicant will include the following items as part of their application for PCD: 1. The proposed restaurant in the new development will not include a drive-thru and will have no outdoor seating for the restaurant. 2. The restaurant will be located on the west end of the new building. 3. There will be a moratorium on any new zoning changes to Lots 2 and 3 (rezoned to Lot 2R) for a period of three years from the date of approval of the PCD. Attorneys at Law CYRILHOLLINGSWORTH CALMoCASTLAIN DARRELL D. DOVER (19332009) THOMAS S. STONE MARK H. ALLISON 425 W. CAPITOL AVE STE 3700 PHILIP E. DIXON (1932-2005) ALLAN W. HORNE (1932-2018) STEVE L. RIGGS 19ANDALL L. SYNUMt LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201.3465 MICHAEL 0. PARKER MONTE D. ESTES TELEPHONE (501) 375-9151 OF COUNSEL JOSEPH H. PURVIS JOHN B. PEACE MATTHEWC. BOCH4 TODD WOOTEN FACSIMILE (501) 375.6484 GARLAND W. BINNS, JR. WILLIAM DEAN OVERSTREET TJ LAWHON www.ddh.law =ALSO LICENSED IN TENNESSEE MICHAEL G. SMITH + STEPHEN R. GILES +ALSO LICENSED IN TEXAS GARY B. ROGERS CARL F. (TREY) COOPER III tALSO LICENSED IN COLUMBIA JAMES PAUL BEACHBOARD - ADRIENNE M. GRIFFIS ILUN0IS #ALSO LICENSED IN LL1N NATAUE E. RAMM August 13, 2019 MERITAS LAW FIRMS WORLDWIDE Via e-mail: SLangley@LittleRock.gov Ms. Susan Langley Little Rock City Clerk City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Chevaux Office Park PCD No. Z -7605-D Dear Ms. Langley: Our law firm represents the Chevaux Court POA that opposed the rezoning of Lots 2 and 3 of Chevaux Office Park at the Planning Commission meeting on July 18, 2019, resulting in a denial of the application to rezone. Subsequently an appeal was filed to the City Board of Directors concerning the above -referenced planning file number. Over the last few weeks Mr. Bill Sutton, the president of the Chevaux Court POA, and other POA homeowners have been negotiating with Mr. Ryan Harper, a representative of the applicant for the rezoning. The purpose of discussions was to try to come to an agreement whereby the POA would withdraw its opposition to the PCD if the applicant would install and maintain certain improvements on office park property to screen and buffer traffic noise and lights from the abutting homes and property of POA owners. We are pleased to announce that such an agreement has been reached in which the applicant will include the following items as part of their application for PCD: 1. The proposed restaurant in the new development will not include a drive-thru and will have no outdoor seating for the restaurant. 2. The restaurant will be located on the west end of the new building. 3. There will be a moratorium on any new zoning changes to Lots 2 and 3 (rezoned to Lot 2R) for a period of three years from the date of approval of the PCD. DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC Page 2 4. Applicant will arrange for the repair of the broken, damaged, and missing planks and will reattach loose planks to the existing perimeter fence along the east and south property lines. S. Applicant has repaired the landscape sprinkler system and will maintain such system in an operable condition. 6. Applicant will add a double -sided wooden fence six (6) feet in height at the top of the slope on the east side of the office park abutting the POA neighborhood. The fence will extend to the north in order to screen all the parking spaces along the east line of the office park. 7. Applicant will install and maintain additional landscaping along the slope between the office park and the neighborhood to assist with screening. The species of plants will be selected by a homeowner in the neighborhood and the POA will purchase the plants consisting of up to ten shrubs or bushes. 8. Mr, Ryan Harper agrees to be the designated contact person regarding necessary maintenance or disputes. In consideration of these amenities promised by the applicant, the Chevaux Court Property Owners Association officially withdraws its opposition to the Chevaux Office Park PCD. Please provide a copy of this letter to the Little Rock Board of Directors for their consideration of this application and let me know if you need any further information from me or my client. Sincerely, DOVER DIXON HORNE PLL Stephen R. Giles SRG/als cc: Mr. Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivision Manager dcarney&.Li l tle hock. gov Mr. Bill Sutton (wsutt43CgsUcgiobat.net) Mr. Ryan Harper (Ryan @).harco.net) Carney, Dana From: Stephen R. Giles <SGiles@ddh.law> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 3:41 PM To: Langley, Susan Cc: Carney, Dana; Ryan Harper; Bill Sutton Subject: Chexaux Office Park PCD Z -7605-D Attachments: 2019-8-13 Itr to City Clerk.pdf Importance: High Susan — Attached is a letter concerning an appeal that has been filed from a matter at the July 18 Planning Commission meeting. Please distribute this to the members of the Little Rock Board of Directors. Thank you, Steve Stephen R. Giles, Esq. DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3700 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Direct: (501) 978-9934 Telephone: (501) 375-9151 Facsimile: (501) 375-6484 sgiles@ddh.law 1 Ms. Susan Langley Little Rock City Clerk City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Chevaux Office Park PCD No. Z -7605-D Dear Ms. Langley: Our law firm represents the Chevaux Court POA that opposed the rezoning of Lots 2 and 3 of Chevaux Office Park at the Planning Commission meeting on July 18, 2019, resulting in a denial of the application to rezone. Subsequently an appeal was filed to the City Board of Directors concerning the above -referenced planning file number. Over the last few weeks Mr. Bill Sutton, the president of the Chevaux Court POA, and other POA homeowners have been negotiating with Mr. Ryan Harper, a representative of the applicant for the rezoning. The purpose of discussions was to try to come to an agreement whereby the POA would withdraw its opposition to the PCD if the applicant would install and maintain certain improvements on office park property to screen and buffer traffic noise and lights from the abutting homes and property of POA owners. We are pleased to announce that such an agreement has been reached in which the applicant will include the following items as part of their application for PCD: 1. The proposed restaurant in the new development will not include a drive-thru and will have no outdoor seating for the restaurant. 2. The restaurant will be located on the west end of the new building. 3. There will be a moratorium on any new zoning changes to Lots 2 and 3 (rezoned to Lot 2R) for a period of three years from the date of approval of the PCD. DOVER DIXON HORNE PLL,C Attorneys at Law CYRILHOLLING9WORTH CALMaCASTLAIN DARRELL D. DOVER (1933.2009) THOMAS S. STONE MARK H. ALLISON 425 W. CAPITOL AVE STE 3700 PHILIP E. DIXON (1932.2005) ALLAN W. HORNE (1032-2010) STEVE L HIGGS RANDALL L 9YNUMt LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201-3465 MICHAEL O. PARKER MONTE D. ESTES TELEPHONE (501) 375-9151 OF COUNSEL JOSEPH H. PURVIS JOHN S. PEACE MATTHEW C. BOCF4 TODD WOOTEN FACSIMILE (501) 375-6484 GARLAND W BINNS, JR. WILLIAM DEAN OVERSTREET TJ LAWHON www.ddh.law =ALSO LICENSED IN TENNESSEE MICHAEL G. SMITH a STEPHEN R. GILES +ALSO LICENSED IN TEXAS GARY B. ROGERS CARL F. (TREY) COOPER 111 t ALSO LICENSED IN DISTRICT COLUMBIA JAMES PAUL BEACHBOARD - ADRIENNE M. GRIFFIS *ALSO LICENSED IN ILLINOIS NATALIE E. RAMM August 13, 2019 MERIfAs LAW FIRMS WORLDWIDE Via e-mail: Stan lev c I.ittleitoek. rov Ms. Susan Langley Little Rock City Clerk City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Chevaux Office Park PCD No. Z -7605-D Dear Ms. Langley: Our law firm represents the Chevaux Court POA that opposed the rezoning of Lots 2 and 3 of Chevaux Office Park at the Planning Commission meeting on July 18, 2019, resulting in a denial of the application to rezone. Subsequently an appeal was filed to the City Board of Directors concerning the above -referenced planning file number. Over the last few weeks Mr. Bill Sutton, the president of the Chevaux Court POA, and other POA homeowners have been negotiating with Mr. Ryan Harper, a representative of the applicant for the rezoning. The purpose of discussions was to try to come to an agreement whereby the POA would withdraw its opposition to the PCD if the applicant would install and maintain certain improvements on office park property to screen and buffer traffic noise and lights from the abutting homes and property of POA owners. We are pleased to announce that such an agreement has been reached in which the applicant will include the following items as part of their application for PCD: 1. The proposed restaurant in the new development will not include a drive-thru and will have no outdoor seating for the restaurant. 2. The restaurant will be located on the west end of the new building. 3. There will be a moratorium on any new zoning changes to Lots 2 and 3 (rezoned to Lot 2R) for a period of three years from the date of approval of the PCD. DOVER DIXON HORNE PLLC Page 2 4. Applicant will arrange for the repair of the broken, damaged, and missing planks and will reattach loose planks to the existing perimeter fence along the east and south property lines. S. Applicant has repaired the landscape sprinkler system and will maintain such system in an operable condition. 6. Applicant will add a double -sided wooden fence six (6) feet in height at the top of the slope on the east side of the office park abutting the POA neighborhood. The fence will extend to the north in order to screen all the parking spaces along the east line of the office park. 7. Applicant will install and maintain additional landscaping along the slope between the office park and the neighborhood to assist with screening. The species of plants will be selected by a homeowner in the neighborhood and the POA will purchase the plants consisting of up to ten shrubs or bushes. 8. Mr. Ryan Harper agrees to be the designated contact person regarding necessary maintenance or disputes. In consideration of these amenities promised by the applicant, the Chevaux Court Property Owners Association officially withdraws its opposition to the Chevaux Office Park PCD. Please provide a copy of this letter to the Little Rock Board of Directors for their consideration of this application and let me know if you need any further information from me or my client. Sincerely, DOVER DIXON HORNE PLL �4�0 V Stephen R. Giles SRG/als cc: Mr. Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivision Manager dcnrlievlci7Little ltc7ck. iioy Mr. Bill Sutton (wsutt43la?sbeg,10bl 11.110L) Mr. Ryan Harper R an(ii`liarco. tiet) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON AN APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH A PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT TO ALL owners of land lying adjacent to (including across the street from) the boundary of the property located at: Address: 17705 Cantrell Road General Location: Southeast Corner of Cantrell Road and Chenonceau Blyd. Owned By: 3 1/2 LLC c/o Medical Assets Holdings NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for a Planned Zoning Development of the above property requesting a change of classification from POD District to prT) District has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing on said application will be held by the Little Rock Board of Directors in the Board of Directors Chambers, Second Floor, City Hall on Tuesdays $Qptember 3, 2019 at 4w0U pZ�, ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY APPEAR and be heard at said time and place, or may notify the Board of Directors of their view on this matter by letter. All persons interested in this request are invited to call or visit the Department of Planning and Development, 723 West Markham Street, 371-4790, and to review the application and discuss same with the Planning staff. AFFIDAVIT I herby certify that I have notified all the property subject property is being considered for rezoning a is Directors at the time and place described abo�e Applicant (Owner of Authorized Agent (Date) s of record within 200 feet of the above property that Public Hearing will be held by the Little Rock Board of In addition to those on the abstract company list, send notice to the following Neighborhood Associations and record participants: Cindy Boyle 5914 Stonewall Little Rock, AR 72207 Sandra Cobb 5704 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Bill Sutton 43 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Gary Parritt 53 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Sue Auffert 91 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Steve Giles 425 West capitol Avenue, Suite 3700 Little Rock, AR 72223 Bayonne Place NH Association John Carter P. O. Box 242414 Little Rock, AR 72223 Chevaux Court NH Association Frances Stuettgen 85 Chevaux Circle Little Rock AR 72223 Aberdeen Court NH Association Christopher Benton P. O. Box 241992 Little Rock, AR 72223 © WHITE - DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 24 Rahling Circle 0 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 0 Phone: 501-821-1667 www.whitedaters.com March 18, 2019 Mr. Dana Carney, Zoning & Subdivision Manager City of Little Rock 723 W. Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Chevaux Office Park PCD Mr. Carney, Please find attached 18 copies of the PCD for the above referenced project. The property is located at 17,705 Cantrell Road which lies at the southeast corner of Cantrell Road and Chenonceau Boulevard. The property contains 0.8 acres and is currently platted as Lots 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park. The property is part of a larger office park that was developed several years ago with six lots. The developer wishes to combine the two interior lots and construct a single building with a mix of office, commercial and restaurant uses. Currently, there is a branch bank fronting on Cantrell Road and two office buildings in the rear or south side of the development. This application would combine the two middle lots in order to construct a single building with 8,000 sq. ft. of office, commercial and restaurant uses. This plan does not contemplate a drive- thru window as part of the restaurant. With development of these two lots, the office park will have one remaining lot that is planned for office. The southern row of offices buffer the residential subdivision to the south which was the original intent. The surrounding area has changed significantly over the last few years with the Wendy's restaurant, First Security Bank and the Bank OZK headquarters that is under construction just west of this development. The Cantrell/Chenonceau node has developed as staff and surrounding neighbors anticipated. Please place this item on the next available agenda. Do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or require additional information. CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT - SURVEYING - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE sfpzd.doc AFFIDAVIT rL LG 1, +•! bra 4,..e�—_ certify by my signature below that I hereby authorize It■I &, r !� to act as my agent regarding the Vof the below described property. Property described as: 03/01/10 ter! f • � �s-�� s �r � �t it � � % � 7 a7 ��•,-r+�+�1 �� ignatwe of Title fiorJer Date Subscribed and sworn to me a Notary Public on this _ �_ �day of My Commission Expires: C> Notary Public ���ttu ,,,I'pNN A 9,1 {••q�r $57j- Gp a�.49.7p? LOT4R '°U8t1C g�i�GGly r i',1"I'll .. 1�L WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 Little Rock, AR 72201-3699 Maln 501.371.0808 Fax 501.376.9442 wlj.com John William Spivey III ATTORNEY Direct: 501.212.1310 1 jsplvey@wlj.com April 25, 2019 Mr. Dana Carney Via Email Little Rock Planning Department dcarnev@httlerock.gov City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas RE: Planning Commission Agenda; Item No. 8. File No. Z -7605-D Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park Short Form PCD Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Dear Mr. Carney: I have been authorized by the Developer named in the above referenced matter, 3 1/2, LLC, to confirm its request that the above referenced matter be deferred from today's Planning Commission Agenda and placed on the agenda for the next Planning Commission meeting. We understand that it will be necessary for the Commission to adopt a bylaw waiver and representatives of the Developer including Mr. Tim Daters, the project engineer, and I will be present to make the bylaw waiver request in person this afternoon. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation as always. Cordially, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP �'a William Stf5�'W- .JhnII JWS/jlh cc: Mr. Ryan Harper Mr. Joe White Mr. Tim Daters Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP 1847436-v1 Carney, Dana From: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 10:11 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: jspivey@wlj.com; Timothy Daters Subject: Re: Chevaux Office POD We'll reach out to the Chevaux POA and let them know we are deferring. Thanks Joe White iPhone > On Apr 25, 2019, at 9:08 AM, Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> wrote: > Received and will be presented as a deferral request > -----Original Message----- • From: Joe White [mailto:jwhite@whitedaters.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 10:04 AM > To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> > Cc: jspivey@wlj.com; Timothy Daters <tdaters@whitedaters.com> > Subject: Chevaux Office POD > Dana > Good morning. > The owners of the above referenced property would like to request a deferral in order to meet with the neighbors and find common ground on this application. > We understand this will require a bylaw waiver but thought by requesting it now rather than at the meeting we could eliminate the need for the neighbors to travel to the meeting. > Please accept this email as our formal request for a deferral. > I'll wait to hear back from you. > Joe White > iPhone 1 Carney, Dana From: Carney, Dana Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 7:27 AM To: 'Timothy Daters' Cc: Bill Spivey Subject: RE: Chevaux POD Need to be at the meeting to make that request. I will inform the Chairman. I will ask to place it on consent agenda for deferral but it will take a bylaw waiver as the request is being made less than 5 days prior to the meeting. Bill will you inform Mr. Sutton of this? From: Timothy Daters [mailto:tdaters@whitedaters.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 8:33 PM To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Cc: Bill Spivey <jspivey@wlj.com> Subject: Re: Chevaux POD Dana, The applicant would like to defer this item and have authorized Bill Spivey to do so. I will be out of the office most of the day on Thursday and have asked Bill to contact you directly. Thank you for your assistance. Tim Timothy E Daters, PE White-Daters & Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 M: (501) 580-5694 E: tdaters0whiWaters.com Carney, Dana From: Carney, Dana Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 8:02 AM To: Malone, Walter Subject: FW: Chevaux PCD Attachments: PCD 04-19-19.pdf Revise plan for Chevaux PCD for Thursday. Please bring it in case we need to put it up From: Tamara Guffey [mailto:tguffey@whitedaters.com] Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 9:33 AM To: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Cc: wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Subject: Chevaux PCD Dana, Good morning. I met with Bill Sutton and John Allison who both live in Chevaux Court. We reviewed the plans for the PCD and drove both the office and neighborhood together. We all agreed that a row of evergreen plants along the east side of the proposed building would help screen the closest neighbors to the east. I have attached a revised plan showing the location, spacing and species of the proposed trees. These will match several trees that are planted behind John Allison's house. Please substitute this revised plan and allow this email to confirm our revised application to incorporate the evergreen screening. Respectfully, Joe White My computer is currently down, so I'm working from my office manager's desktop. Tamara Guffey Office Manager White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 P t- NcRA 3 uerir a �. �• ���� � 10 D' �Dminayk B Walk FamL �' � r_ r ------------ -{ / r � _ y � n1 0.i � r J / I rI Carney, Dana From: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:33 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: RE: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road Dana, We committed in the meeting to extend the evergreen plantings north towards Highway 10 to screen all the properties. We also committed to put the restaurant on the west end towards the other commercial property (NYPD Pizza, etc.) and put the physical therapy/fitness center in the middle. That would leave the 2,000 sq ft office user adjacent to the neighbors on the east end. All residential properties would be adjacent to office users. Committed to repair the existing wood fence between the brick columns. Do a better job of maintaining the current landscaping. Keep the dumpster doors closed except when servicing. Steve Giles is representing the neighborhood POA. Antwan Phillips of Wright, Lindsey and Jennings is representing the developer. Joe White White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 From: Carney, Dana <DCarney@littlerock.gov> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2019 8:09 AM To: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Subject: RE: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road Joe: I am hearing that the fitness center is not a "fitness (therapy) but something else more along the lines of just a fitness center. I also heard the restaurant is being located in the west end of the building. I haven't seen any proposed changes From: Carney, Dana Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 7:30 AM To:'Joe White' <iwhite@whitedaters.com> Subject: RE: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road Sure.......... if any come in From: Joe White [mailto:iwhite@whitedaters.com] Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 7:28 AM To: Carney, Dana <DCa_rney@littlerock.gov> Subject: RE: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road Can you start sending me some of the letters of support............ Joe White White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 From: Carney, Dana <DCarnev@littlerock.gov> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2019 7:27 AM To: Joe White <iwhite whitedaters.com> Subject: FW: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road From: Deborah [mailto:dwalz att.net] Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 5:17 PM To: caberryl955@gmail.com; Brock Ir@sbcglobal.net; la dbee'a mail.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cis.com;glatture0yahoo.com; bmav37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana <DCarnev@littlerock.gov>; Bill Sutton <wsutt43@sbcglobal.net>; Debbie Hayes <hayesdebbie1123PRmail.com>; 5tephanie9405C@aol.com; Esther Rogers <estherrogers@me.com>; giverritt@gmail.com; Director Hines <lancehines@me.com> Subject: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road I have heard and read many reasons why the property at 17705 Cantrell Road should not be rezoned. They are all valid, such as devaluation of property especially after we built our houses based on the Highway 10 Overlay Plan which outlined quiet office businesses behind several of our homes. But my main question is ... Why? Why re -zone this property when there are several properties available within a half -mile radius already zoned for the type of businesses outlined in the new plan? Not only are there empty physical structures available (two in the building that currently houses NYPD Pizza) but there are also empty properties waiting to be developed. With so many properties currently available... why re -zone this particular piece of property? The answer is that there is no need for it to be re -zoned. Obviously, to have a good mixture of businesses in this area, we need to leave the property at 17705 Cantrell Road zoned as it is. Please vote no on a zoning change. Deborah Walz Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 10:04 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: jspivey@wlj.com; Timothy Daters Subject: Chevaux Office POD Dana Good morning. The owners of the above referenced property would like to request a deferral in order to meet with the neighbors and find common ground on this application. We understand this will require a bylaw waiver but thought by requesting it now rather than at the meeting we could eliminate the need for the neighbors to travel to the meeting. Please accept this email as our formal request for a deferral. I'll wait to hear back from you. Joe White iPhone 17L WRIGHT LINDSEY JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2300 Little Rock, AR 72201-3699 Main 501,371.0808 Fax 501.376.9442 wlj.com John William Spivey III ATTORNEY Direct: 501.212.1310 1 jsplvey@wlj.com April 25, 2019 Mr. Dana Carney Via Email Little Rock Planning Department dcarney@httlerock.gov City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas RE: Planning Commission Agenda; Item No. 8. File No. Z -7605-D Name: Lots 2 & 3 Chevaux Office Park Short Form PCD Location: 17705 Cantrell Road Dear Mr. Carney: I have been authorized by the Developer named in the above referenced matter, 3 1/2, LLC, to confirm its request that the above referenced matter be deferred from today's Planning Commission Agenda and placed on the agenda for the next Planning Commission meeting. We understand that it will be necessary for the Commission to adopt a bylaw waiver and representatives of the Developer including Mr. Tim Daters, the project engineer, and I will be present to make the bylaw waiver request in person this afternoon. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation as always. Cordially, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP J hn William Sp i II JWS/jlh cc: Mr. Ryan Harper Mr. Joe White Mr. Tim Daters Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP 1847436-v1 Carney, Dana From: Tamara Guffey <tguffey@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 8:03 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Chevaux POD Attachments: POD 04-11-19.pdf Dana, Good morning. Working from Tamara's computer. Cheavaux pdf attached with comments matching what we sent yesterday. Will bring you paper copies today. Used the shopping center parking at 1 to 225 since we have a mixed use. Still think we'd meet the requirement if we broke them out. Let me know what you think. Did you notify the Chevaux POA? Have you heard anything from them? Thanks Joe Tamara Guffey Office Manager White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 From: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 7:59 AM To: Tamara Guffey <tguffey@whitedaters.com> Subject: Fwd: Chevaux POD Joe White iPhone Begin forwarded message: 1 From: Kyle Blakely <kbiakel whitedaters.com> Date: April 11, 2019 at 7:58:31 AM CDT To: Joe White <iwhite@whitedaters.com> Subject: Chevaux POD See attached. Kyle Blakely, RLA, LEED AP BD+C White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 501.821.1667 x 114 office 501.454.5185 cell 42 43 a 0°°' RAY) eta,. �5 --------------- - ----------- - , , t r?, �f / — --- Z& uwib I r i.� 1 f r::a .p . 2Rt a��,a l � � -�w 1 �r r I �r _a�m+c urs I ! 47 r. c mfwxloa 3 • b S �� � � � ' � 9 � Cdr, U r / o c+ Carney, Dana From: Joe White <jwhite@whitedaters.com> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 8:30 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Fwd: Chevaux Attachments: POD 04-11-19.pdf, ATT00001.htm No signs Joe White iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kyle Blakely <kblakely@whitedaters.com> Date: April 11, 2019 at 8:26:52 AM CDT To: Joe White <iwhite@whitedaters.com> Subject: Chevaux See attached. Kyle Blakely, RLA, LEED AP BD+C White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 501.821.1667 x 114 office 501.454.5185 cell Carney, Dana From: Tamara Guffey <tguffey@whitedaters.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 4:37 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: Joe White Subject: Lots 2 & 3 , Chevaux Office Park Z -7605-D Mr. Carney Below are the responses to the Planning Commission comments on the above project. 1. Notices were mailed today as required 2. General Notes and Public Works Notes have been corrected 3. Office Space 2,000 SF, Fitness (Therapy) Center 3,000 SF, Restaurant (No Drive-Thru) 3,000 SF 4. Shared monument sign 64 SF in area 5. Office Space 7:00 am — 7:00 pm, 5 days a week Fitness (Therapy) Center 5:30 am — 8:00 pm, 6 days a week Restaurant 7:00 am —10:00 pm, 7 days a week Please let us know if you need any additional information. Thank you Tamara Guffey Office Manager White-Daters & Associates, Inc. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 P: (501) 821-1667 F: (501) 821-1668 EnteW March 25, 2019 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development ATTN: Dana Carney 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Entergy Arkansas LLC 12209 Entergy Court Little Rock. AR 72211 RE: Entergy comments related to Planning and Zoning items for the April 25th Meeting Mr. Moore, Please find below Entergy's comments related to the items received from the Department of Planning and Development last week. The request letter said to have the comments back to you by April 1St, 2019. + Lots 1R & 211 Barrow Plaza Addition — prelim plat — 9101 W Markham — S -1312-B Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. A three-phase overhead power line already exists on the north side of West Markham Street on the north side of this property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Wildwood Ridge Phase IV — prelim plat — W end of Summershade Dr. — S -1665-H Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. A single-phase underground power line already exists along Summershade Drive feeding previous phases of the subdivision. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Fitzroy Promenade — site plan review — NE corner Rahling Rd & St Vincent Way — S -867-Z (8) Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. A three-phase underground power line already exists along the west side of Rahling and the south side of St Vincent Way. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Fletcher Ridge long -form PRD — N side of Kanis, W of Chenal Downs — Z-9409 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. There is an existing three phase, overhead power line along Kanis Road just to the east which may need to be extended to serve this development. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Lots 2&3 Chevaux Office Park — short form PCD —17705 Cantrell Rd. - Z -7605-D Entergy does not object to this proposal. There is an existing three phase, underground power line in this area serving existing buildings. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Shackelford Forest Communities—long-form POD— 5600 S Shackelford Rd. - Z-9408 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. There is an existing overhead power line on the west side of South Shackelford running by this development. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments/extension of facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Village at The Gateway —long -form POD — W of existing Village at The Gateway, 4 blocks W of Vimy Ridge Rd. — Z-9407 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with . existing electrical utilities at this location. There is an existing underground power line in this area serving existing developments in the subdivision to the east. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. • Grow Learning Center — rev PID — 5 Remington Cove — Z -7854-F Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. A three-phase overhead power line already exists along the west side of Talley Rd to the west of this development, and another one on the north side of the property along Remington Cove. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Orion Federal Credit Union — short -form PD -O —1019 N University — Z -4029-C Entergy does not object to this proposal. As noted on the print there is an existing three phase, overhead power line on the east side of University on the west side of this property. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location. However, please note that a new drive will be installed on the SW corner of the property. All NESC and OSHA required clearances to overhead power lines and other utilities must be maintained during and after construction of the drive. The same applies for the drive to be constructed off Evergreen. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. ■ Flagship Homes Townhouse Apartments — short -form PD -R — NW corner of Florida and Indiana — Z-9406 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There is an existing three phase, overhead power line on the north side of Indiana Ave. on the south side of this property. It does not conflict with the project proposal. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. ■ Dogwood Partners — short -form POD — 3023 W 7" St. - Z -6810-A Entergy does not object to this proposal. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities at this location currently. However, the proposal indicated that a future addition for a structure on the SW corner of the property could happen. There is an existing overhead power line running along the east side of Johnson St. Care must be used to maintain NESC and OSHA required clearances to this power line. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments to existing facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. Innovation Valley — short -form PD -R — SW of 13815 & 13823 Fern Valley Lane - Z-9405 Entergy does not object to this proposal. There is an existing underground power line feeding both houses from the front property line. There do not appear to be any conflicts with existing electrical utilities in the rear of these locations. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments/extension of facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. * 517 Maple St. — short -form PD -R — 517 Maple St. — Z-9404 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical service is already provided to the structure on this property from on overhead power line at the back of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, extensions, or adjustments to existing facilities. ■ 2322 W 311 St. — short -form PD -R — 2322 W. 3rd St. — Z-9403 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical service is already provided to the structure on this property from on overhead power line at the back of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, extensions, or adjustments to existing facilities. 22 Daven Court — short -form PD -R — 22 Daven Court - Z -2771-A Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical service is already provided to the structure on this property from on overhead power line at the back of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, extensions, or adjustments to existing facilities. • TRL Properties, LLC — Revised PD -O —12418 —12420 Cantrell — Z -5570-D Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical service is already provided to the structure on this property from on overhead power line at the front of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, extensions, or adjustments to existing facilities. ■ Greenhaw Properties — short -form PD -R — 3523 W Capitol Ave. - Z-9402 Entergy does not object to this proposal. However, there is an existing overhead power line on the east side of this property which provides service to the existing house. This power line may need to be adjusted to provide service to both the existing and new house. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, or adjustments, extension of facilities (if any) as this project proceeds. 7900 Doyle Springs Road — short -form PID — 7900 Doyle Springs Rd. - Z-9401 Entergy does not object to this proposal. Electrical service is already provided to the structure on this property from on overhead power line at the front of the property. Contact Entergy in advance to discuss electrical service requirements, extensions, or adjustments to existing facilities. If you need further assistance you may contact John Jones at 501-954-5158 (e-mail: jjone34(@entergy.com) as he will be replacing me as the Region Engineering Supervisor upon my retirement later this week. Sincerely, Bernard Neumeier, P.E. Region Engineering Supervisor Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Z -Z -2771-A Address: 22 Daven Court Planning Division: This request is located 65 Street East Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density (RL) category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single -Family District) to PD -R (Planned Development Residential) to recognize an existing residence with detached garage and second floor apartment. Master Street Plan: South of the property is Daven Court and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan- The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non- residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z -4029-C Address: 1019 N.University Ave Pianning Division: This request is located in Heights Hillcrest Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public/Institutional (PI) for this property. The Public/Institutional category includes public and quasi -public facilities that provide a variety of services to the community such as schools, libraries, fire stations, churches, utility substations, and hospitals. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from 0-2 (Office and Institutional District) to PD -O (Planned Development Office) to allow development of a branch credit union. The site is within the Midtown Design Overlay Districts. Master Street Plan: West of the property is N.University Ave and it shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. North of the property is Evergreen Drive and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on University Avenue since it is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along N. University Ave. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Z -5570-D Address: 12418-12420 Cantrell Road Planning Division This request is located in River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Office (0) for this property. The Office category represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g., legal, financial, medical) as well as general offices which support more basic economic activities. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single -Family District) and PD -O (Planned Development Office) to PD -O (Planned Development Office) to add an adjacent R-2 zoned tract to the existing PD -O. No New Development is proposed at this time. The site is within the Highway 10 Overlay Districts.- Master istricts: Master Street Plan: South of the property is Cantrell Road and it shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: A Class I Bike Path is shown along Cantrell Road. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of-way or an easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). Z -681 0-A Address: 3023 W 7th Street Planning Division: This request is located in 1630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Mixed Use (MX) for this property. The Mixed Use Category provides for a mixture of residential, office and commercial uses to occur. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is entirely office or commercial or if the use is a mixture of the three. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single Family District) to POD (Planned Office District) office uses as an allowable use and a future building addition. Master Street Plan: West of the property is Johnson Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. North of the property is W 7th Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: There is a Class III Bike Route shown on 7t" Street. Bike Routes require no additional right-of-way, but either a sign or pavement marking to identify and direct the route. Z -7605-D 17705 Cantrell Road Planning Division: This request is located in Chenal Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Office (0) for this property. The Office category represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g., legal, financial, medical) as well as general offices which support more basic economic activities. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from POD (Planned Office District) to PCD (Planned Commercial District) to change the approved plan to one mixed retail/restaurant/office building within the larger office complex. The site is within the Highway 10 Overlay Districts Master Street Plan: North of the property is Cantrell Road and it shown as a Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan The primary function of a Principal Arterial Street is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generator or activity centers within an urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: A Class I Bike Path is shown along Cantrell Road. A Bike Path is to be a paved path physically separate for the use of bicycles. Additional right-of- way or an easement is recommended. Nine -foot paths are recommended to allow for pedestrian use as well (replacing the sidewalk). Z -7854-F Address: 5 Remington Cove Planning Division. This request is located 65 Street West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Light Industrial (L+I) for this property. The Light Industrial category provides for light warehouse, distribution or storage uses, and/or other industrial uses that are developed in a well-designed "park like" setting. The applicant has applied for a Revised PID (Planned Industrial District) to allow the expansion of an existing daycare facility. Master Street Plan: North of the property is Remington Cove and it is shown as a Local on the Master Street Plan. West of the property is Talley Road and it is shown as a Local on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or -more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan. There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9401 Address: 7900 Doyle Springs Road Planning Division: This request is located in Geyer Springs East Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Medium Density (RM) for this property. The Residential Medium Density category accommodates a broad range of housing types including single family attached, single family detached, duplex, town homes, multi -family and patio or garden homes. Any combination of these and possibly other housing types may fall in this category provided that the density is between six (6) and twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single -Family District) to PID (Planned Industrial District) to recognize an existing developed non -conforming site and allow 1-2 uses. Master Street Plan: East of the property is Doyle Spring Road and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9402 Address: 3523 W. Capitol Ave Planning Division: This request is located in 1630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density (RL) category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single -Family District) to PD -R (Planned Development Residential) to subdivide an existing lot and build a second single family home on the new lot. Master Street Plan: West of the property is S Valentine Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. North of the property is Capitol Avenue and it is shown as a Collector on the Master Street Plan The primary function of a Collector Road is to provide a connection from Local Streets to Arterials. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site Bicycle Plan: There is a Class III Bike Route shown on W Capitol Ave. Bike Routes require no additional right-of-way, but either a sign or pavement marking to identify and direct the route. Z- Z-9403 Address: 2322 W.3rd Street Planning Division: This request is located in 1630 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density (RL) category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single -Family District) to PD -R (Planned Development Residential) to recognize an existing duplex. Master Street Plan: West of the property is Dennison Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. South of the property is W 3rd Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9404 Address: 517 Maple Street Planning Eivision This request is located in 1630 District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density (RL) category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-3 (Single -Family District) to PD -R (Planned Development Residential) to recognize an existing duplex. Master Street Plan: West of the property is Maple Street and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non- residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. MPLi& Address: SW of 13815 and 13823 Fern Valley lane Planning Division: This request is located in Ellis Mountain District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density (RL) category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from PRD (Planned Residential District) to PD -R (Planned Development Residential) to build a personal storage accessory building on a separate vacant lot. Master Street Plan: North of the property is Fern Valley Lane and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non- residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity - Z -9406 Address: NW corner of Florida and Indiana Planning Division. This request is located in West Little Rock Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Medium Density (RM) for this property. The Residential Medium Density category accommodates a broad range of housing types including single family attached, single family detached, duplex, town homes, multi -family and patio or garden homes. Any combination of these and possibly other housing types may fall in this category provided that the density is between six (6) and twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-4 (Two Family District) to PD -R. (Planned Development Residential) to allow the development of three homes on one 7500 square -foot lot. Master Street, Plan: East of the property is Florida Ave and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan. South of the property is Indiana Ave and it is shown as a Local Street on the Master Street Plan The primary function of a Local Street is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements. Bicycle Pian: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9407 Address: West of the existing village at the Gateway, 4 Blocks west of Vimy Ridge Road. Piannin,q Division: This request is located Otter Creek Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) and Residential Medium Density (RM) for this property. The Residential Low Density is for single-family homes at densities no greater than six dwelling units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may also include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The Residential Medium Density category accommodates a broad range of housing types including single family attached, single family detached, duplex, town homes, multi -family and patio or garden homes. Any combination of these and possibly other housing types may fall in this category provided that the density is between six (6) and twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The applicant has applied for a rezoning from R-2 (Single-family District) to PRD (Planned Residential District) to allow the construction of a subdivision of triplex and quad-plex units on separate lots. Master Street Plan: There are not streets adjacent to the site. Pine Rock Court and Big Rock Avenue enter the site from the east in the north and south parts of the site respectively. Both are shown on the Master Street Plan as Local Streets. The primary function of Local Streets is to provide access to adjacent properties. Local Streets that are abutted by non-residential zoning/use or more intensive zoning than duplexes are considered as "Commercial Streets". A Collector design standard is used for Commercial Streets. These streets may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes shown in the immediate vicinity. Z-9408 Address: 5600 South Shackleford Road Planning Division: This request is located in 65th Street West Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Service Trades District (STD) and Residential Low Density (RL) and Suburban Office (SO) for this property. The Service Trades District category provides for a selection of office, warehousing, and industrial park activities that primarily serve other office service or industrial businesses. The district is intended to allow support services to these businesses and to provide for uses with an office component. A Planned Zoning District is required for any development not wholly office. The Residential Low Density is for single-family homes at densities no greater than six dwelling units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may also include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The suburban office category shall provide for low intensity development of office or office parks in close proximity to lower density residential areas to assure compatibility. A Planned Zoning District is required. The applicant has applied for rezoning from R-2 (Single Family District) to POD (Planned Office District) to allow the development of an in-patient and out- patient rehabilitation complex on 4 lots Master Street Plan: East of the property is Shackleford Road are shown as Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on South Shackleford Road since it is a Minor Arterial. -This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicycle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along Shackleford Road. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. Address: Northside of Kanis Road, West of Chenal Downs Road Planning Division. This request is located in Burlingame Valley Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Residential Low Density (RL) for this property. The Residential Low Density is for single-family homes at densities no greater than six dwelling units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may also include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. The applicant has applied for rezoning from R-2 (Single Family District) to PRD (Planned Residential District) to allow for future development of a single family subdivision in 5 phases Master Street Plan: South of the property is Kanis Road are shown as Minor Arterial on the Master Street Plan. A Minor Arterial provides connections to and through an urban area and their primary function is to provide short distance travel within the urbanized area. Entrances -and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Kanis Road since it is a Minor Arterial. This street may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street improvements for entrances and exits to the site. Bicvcle Plan: A Class II Bike Lane is shown along Kanis Road. Bike Lanes provide a portion of the pavement for the sole use of bicycles. City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: May 1, 2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Bavonne Place Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: John Carter ADDRESS: P. O. Box 242414 Little Rock AR 72223 REQUEST: Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow an 8,000 square foot building with a mixture of office commercial and restaurant uses deferred from April 25.2019 GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3'/2 LLC c/o Medical Assets Holdin NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zoning for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on June 6.2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title VI Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ccurryC�7a.liitlerock.gay. This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La Ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminaci6n en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen nacional, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientaci6n sexual, identidad de genero, informaci6n genetica, las opiniones politicas o aftliaci6n, en la admisi6n o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi como de contrataci6n de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discriminacion y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo VI, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direcciin de correo electr6nico: ccyMd2littleraek.gov. 7 /_Iamie Collins, Director City of Little Rock CcDepartment of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: May -1, 2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Chevaux Court Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Frances Stuetten ADDRESS: 85 Chevaux Circle Little Rock AR 72223 REQUEST: Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow an 8,000 s care foot building with a mixture of office commercial and restaurant uses deferred from Al2ril 25.2019 GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3'/z LLC c/o Medical Assets Holding NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zoning for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on June 6, 2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The Ciry of'Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis ofrace, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title VI Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ccurrynlittlerock gov. This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La Ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discrimination en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen national, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientaci6n sexual, identidad de genero, information genetica, las opiniones politicas o afiliacion, en la admisi6n o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi tomo de contrataciin de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discrimination y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo VI, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direcci6n de correo electr6nico: 004111• a.litllenock gov. Jamie Collins, Director City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: Mav 1.2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO:_ Aberdeen Court Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Christopher Benton ADDRESS: P. O. Box 241992 Little Rock, AR 72223 REQUEST:_ Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow ars 8.040 square foot building with a mixture of office, commercial and restaurant uses (deferred April 25, 2019) GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3'/z LLC c/o Medical Assets Holdin NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zonitlt for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on ,June 6. 2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis ofrace, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title VI Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ceurr„ littlerock.gov, This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminacion en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen national, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientation sexual, identidad de genero, information genetica, las opiniones political o afiliacion, en la admision o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi tomo de contratacion de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discriminacion y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo V1, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direction de correo electronico: ccurrv(a.lilderock. zov. -y7 Jamie Collins, Director City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 Date: March 19. 2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO:- Bayonne Place Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: John Carter ADDRESS: P. O. Box 242414 Little Rock, AR 72223 REQUEST: Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow an 8.000 square foot building with a mixture of office, commercial and restaurant uses. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3%2 LLC c/o Medical Assets NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zoning for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on April 25. 2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis ofrace, color, creed religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title V1 Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ccur► ittlerock ov. This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminaci6n en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen national, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientation sexual, identidad de genero, information genetica, las opiniones politicas o afiliaci6n, en la admisi6n o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi tomo de contrataci6n de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discrimination y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo VI, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direcci6n de correo electr6nico: ccurrv. aa-Vittlerock.zov. Jamie Collins, Director City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: March 19, 2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Chevaux Court Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Frances Stuettgen ADDRESS: 85 Chevaux Circle Little Rock AR 72223 REQUEST: Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow an 8,000 s ware foot building with a mixture of office commercial and restaurant uses. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3%2 LLC c/o Medical Assets Holdina NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zonin>r for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on April 25, 2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis ofrace, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title VI Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ccurry@littlerockgov. This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminaci6n en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen nacional, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientaci6n sexual, identidad de genero, informaci6n genetica, las opiniones political o afiliaci6n, en la admisi6n o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi como de contrataci6n de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discriminaci6n y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo VI, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direcci6n de correo electr6nico: ccur ittlerock, ov. Jamie Collins, Director y_ City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Date: March 19. 2019 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON A REQUEST FOR USE CHANGE OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TO: Aberdeen Court Neighborhood Association ATTENTION: Christopher Benton ADDRESS: P. O. Box 241992 Little Rock, AR 72223 REQUEST: - Rezone from POD Planned Office Development to PCD Planned Commercial Development to allow an 8,000 square foot building with a mixture of office, commercial and restaurant uses. GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: 17705 Cantrell OWNED BY: 3% LLC c10 Medical Assets Holdin NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for PCD Zoning for the above property has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing will be held by the L.R. Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, second floor, City Hall, on April 25. 2019 at 4:00 P.M. This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood associations are aware of issues that may affect their neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to the Planning staff at 371-4790. The City of Little Rock complies with all civil rights provisions of federal laws and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The City of Little Rock does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, income status, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, genetic information, political opinions or affiliation, in admission or access to and treatment in the City's programs and activities, as well as the city's hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the City's nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Caran Curry, Title VI Coordinator, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, or the following e-mail address: ecurry@littlerockgav: This notice is available from the Title VI Coordinator in large print or recording. Free language assistance for those with Limited English Proficiency is available upon request. La ciudad de Little Rock cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminaci6n en programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. La ciudad de Little Rock no discrimina por motivos de raza, color, credo, religion, sexo, origen nacional, edad, discapacidad, estado de ingresos, estado civil, orientaci6n sexual, identidad de genero, informaci6n genetica, las opiniones politicas o afiliaci6n, en la admisi6n o acceso y tratamiento en los programas y actividades de la ciudad, asi como de contrataci6n de empleados de la ciudad. Las quejas de supuesta discriminaci6n y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la ciudad pueden ser dirigidas a Caran Curry, Coordinador del Titulo VI, 500 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72201, 501-371-4583, o en la siguiente direcci6n de correo electr6nico: ccurr�a,littlerock.gov, r Jamie Collins, Director C�✓a...a,�e OWNERSHIP/ZONE SEARCH Date: March 21, 2019 File Number: 19-016793-050 Prepared For: White-Daters and Associates, Inc. Lenders Title Company has searched the records of the Real Estate Records of Pulaski County, Arkansas to determine the apparent ownership of property within 200 feet of the perimeter of the following described property as of March 8, 2019 at 8:00 a.m. Lot 2 and 3, Chevaux Office Park, an Addition to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas. Following is a list of apparent owners of property within 200 feet of the perimeter of the above described property as reflected by the records of the Real Estate Records of Pulaski County, Arkansas: 1. Flake Family Trust, C/O Karen E. Flake, P.O. Box 990, Little Rock, AR, 72203. 2. BancorpSouth Bank, 201 S. Spring Street, Tupelo, MS, 38084. 3. Sandra Cobb, 5704 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 4. Brittany M. Wiley, 5700 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 5. James F. Kuntz, Jr., and Joy Kuntz, 5624 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 6. John Allison and Mary Allison Revocable Trust, 5620 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 7. Michael R. Sanders, 93 Chevaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 8. Auffert Family Trust, 91 Cheveaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 9. Jenny L. Smith, 89 Chevaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 10. Daniel P. Holland and Deborah S. Walz, 87 Chevaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 11. Werniger Living trust, 85 Chevaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 12. Byron D. Brown Jr. Revocable Trust 83 Chevaux Circle, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 13. Deltic Real Estate, LLC, 210 E.Elm Street, El Dorado, AR, 71730. �oc.•�' 14. Flake Family Trust, C/O Karen Flake, P.O. Box 990, Little Rock, AR, 72203. 15. John H and Stacia Epps, 5625 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. 16. JW Graf Family Trust, 5621 Chevaux Court, Little Rock, AR, 72223. LTC - Ownership Zone Search.rf 1 of 2 This Ownership/Zone Search is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee for informational purposes only. Lenders Title Company is not expressing or attempting to express an opinion as to the validity of the title to the above described property or property noted as being within 200 feet thereof (collectively referred to as "the property"), the accuracy of the addresses, nor as to the validity of any interests or encumbrances, both recorded and unrecorded, that pertain to the property. While Lenders Title Company believes that the information stated above is accurate, no assurances are made nor is any liability assumed by Lenders Title Company for any incorrect information stated herein or omitted herefrom. For assurances as to the title to the property, addressee should obtain a title insurance commitment/policy. Sincerely, Lenders Title Company Arkansas License No. IA -82 By: Ryan T. Harrell Title Agent License Number: 16170328 Carney, Dana From: sharonjwlms@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 9:04 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Fwd: Rezoning meeting regarding Chevaux Court Attachments: Mission Statement.docx -----Original Message ----- From: sharonjwlms <sharonjwlms@aol.com> To: lancehines <lancehines@me.com>; darney <darney@littlerock.org> Cc: wsutt43 <wsutt43@sbcglobal>; net <net@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Jul 17, 2019 12:43 pm Subject: Rezoning meeting regarding Chevaux Court Hello, In light of the impending rezoning vote affecting the Chevaux neighborhood, I wanted to remind you of the Little Rock's Planning and Development Committee's Mission Statement which, in part, "encourages quality growth" and "stabilization of neighborhoods" through "planning and permitting". I consider the rezoning vote to be a wonderful opportunity for the committee to live up to both the spirit and letter of the Mission Statement. Thank you for your consideration, Nick and Sharon Williams 20 year Residents of Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Joyce Underwood <jmu1939@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 7:48 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; Bill May; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: Rezoning Request 17705 Cantrell Road To: Little Rock Planning Commission From: Joyce Underwood As an 18 year resident of Chevaux Court, I am respectfully requesting that you vote to deny the requested rezoning of the property at 17705 Cantrell Road. Constructing an 8000 square foot building directly behind our neighborhood will severely impact the quiet serene neighborhood my husband and I moved into in 2001. Sadly, I lost my husband last year, but I hope to spend my remaining years in the neighborhood that we both loved and worked to maintain. Many of us in the neighborhood are widows, and our ages range from 60-85. The increased traffic is already a major problem, but construction of the Office Park Building will add traffic and noise as it is scheduled to be open from 7:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. We do appreciate the fact that we have a traffic signal at Chevaux, but it is still quite difficult to make a left turn into our neighborhood as there is no protected turn signal. Many drivers speed up and down Cantrell, and some speed through the light as it is turning. It is truly dangerous for people of any age, and especially for those of us who move at a slower pace. Thank you for serving on the Planning Commission. I know you have a difficult decision to make, but I believe that a decision to vote "No" on the Office Park building is the right one. Thank you, Joyce Underwood Carney, Dana From: Sharon Williams <sannwilliams@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:53 AM To: Carney, Dana; sdanhl @gmail.com; platture@yahoo.com; ravogel@gmail.com Subject: Fw: Proposed Zoning Change On Hwy.10/Cantrell Road area ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Sharon Williams <sannwilliams@att.net> To: dcarney.@littlerock.gov <dcarney.@littlerock.gov>; caberryl955@gmail.com <caberry1955@gmail. com>; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net <brock_lr@sbcglobal.net>; laybeejay@gmail.com <laybeejay@gmail.com>; sdanhh1@gmail.com <sdanhhl@gmail.com>; mhaynes@21cjs.com <mhaynes@21cjs.com>; patture@yahoo.com <patture@yahoo.com>; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com <rrahman@barberlawfirm.com>; robertbstebbins@att.net <robertbstebbins@att.net>; ArkRealEstate@aol.com <ArkRealEstate@aol.com>; ravogel@gmal.com <ravogel@gmal.com>; lancehines@me.com <lancehines@me.com>; bmay37@sbcglobal.net <bmay37@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019, 11:47:41 AM CDT Subject: Proposed Zoning Change On Hwy.10/Cantrell Road area Recently, I sent an email stating my concern about proposed changes in the zoning area near my home in Chevaux Court. When I moved to this area twenty years ago, I was told that the area was zoned for quiet office buildings. Now, there is a proposal to change an area near the entrance to our subdivision to commercial development. There are several reasons why this is a bad idea, but I will only mention one now. As you are well aware, the traffic on Cantrell Road in west Little Rock has increased enormously over the past few years. Near Chevaux Court, there are four schools which generate a lot of traffic, and soon the large corporate office of Bank of OZK will open and increase the traffic even more in this small area. We do not need any form of commercial development that will add more traffic to this area. We are hopeful that this matter will be settled satisfactorily at the Board meeting on Thursday evening. I respectfully request that you vote against commercial development in this area of Cantrell Road. Please abide by the original overlay which called for quiet office development. Thank you for your helpfulness. Best regards, Sharon A. Williams 51 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Carney, Dana From: Stephanie Freeman <stephanie9405@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 11:25 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcgloba1.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; wsutt43@sbcglobal.net; glperritt@gmail.com; hayesdebbie1123 @gmail.com; estherrogers@me.com; sgiles@ddh.law Subject: Re: File Z -7605-D; 17705 Cantrell Road It is my understanding that this proposal is again on the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting tomorrow. Hopefully it will come up for vote. I ask you again to deny this zoning change based on the objection of the adjacent residential subdivision. Thank you, Stephanie Freeman -----Original Message ----- From: Stephanie Freeman <stephanie9405@aol.com> To: dcarney <dcarney@littlerock.gov> Cc: caberry1955 <caberry1955@gmail.com>; brock_Ir <brock_lr@sbcglobal.net>; laydbeejay <laydbeejay@gmail.com>; sdanh1 <sdanh1@gmail.com>; mhaynes <mhaynes@21cjs.com>; platture <platture@yahoo.com>; bmay37 <bmay37@sbcglobal.net>; rrahman <rrahman@barberlawfirm.com>; robertbstebbins <robertbstebbins@att.net>; ArkRealEstate <ArkRealEstate@aol.com>; ravogel <ravogel@gmail.com>; wsutt43 <wsutt43@sbcglobal.net>; glperritt <glperritt@gmail. com>; hayesdebbie1123 <hayesdebbie1123@gmail.com>; estherrogers <estherrogers@me.com>; sgiles <sgiles@ddh.law> Sent: Sun, Jun 2, 2019 7:05 pm Subject: File Z -7605-D; 17705 Cantrell Road Mr. Carney: My name is Stephanie Freeman. I am a resident of Chevaux Court and serve on the board of the associated Property Owners' Association. The purpose of this correspondence is to make known my objection to the proposed rezoning of the adjacent Chevaux Office Park from POD to PCD. Residents of this quiet subdivision purchased our property trusting that the adjacent property would remain zoned only for quiet office. This proposal to change to commercial zoning requests hours of operation for tenants ranging from 5:30 am to 10 pm. This request only addresses the known potential tenants, and opens the door to even more extreme hours for future tenants. Commercial tenants such as restaurants will certainly increase noise and traffic in the area, and trash associated with food service attracts rodents to the area. Residents are objecting because we feel this zoning change will have a negative impact on our existing quality of life, and we also feel it will have a negative impact on our future property value. In preparation for attending the Planning Commission meeting to be held June 6, 1 pulled from the Commission website the file associated with Item D, File Z -7605-D. The last paragraph of that file discusses the April 25, 2019 meeting. I had planned to attend that April 25 meeting, but received a phone call late on the evening of April 24 that this item would be deferred to June 6, and that there was no need to attend. The following is included in the report, which is now obviously z public record: "The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present." That there were no objectors present is true, however at least 44 objectors had planned to be there, but were told the proposal would not be discussed. 1 believe that a reasonable person who reads the statement "There were no registered objectors present' would infer there are no objectors, or that objections were so minor a trip downtown wasn't warranted. That is simply not true, and many of us do plan to attend June 6 to clear up any confusion regarding our position. Thank you for consideration of my objection. Stephanie Freeman 3 Carney, Dana From: Debbie <hayesdebbie1123@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 8:59 AM To: caberry1955@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana Subject: Zoning Variance Request - Chevaux Office Park I am a resident of Chevaux Court subdivision in west Little Rock and am very concerned about a proposed zoning variance on the property adjacent to our neighborhood. I sent an e-mail to you expressing my concerns prior to your June meeting and the issue is now set to be discussed at tomorrow's Planning Commission meeting. My concerns remain the same as expressed previously but wanted to send again for your review. The property on the northwest corner of our neighborhood is currently zoned for office use and consists of office condominiums plus a BancorpSouth branch (17703 Cantrell Road). We have been notified of a proposed rezoning variance which would provide for a new building in the middle of that complex to be zoned as commercial. This proposal appears to be in conflict with the Design Overlay District for Highway 10 and would be extremely disruptive to our neighborhood. It does not make sense to rezone a portion of a tract that is now zoned for office use. We were originally told that a portion of the building would be a physical therapy center but upon additional questioning it appears this would actually be a fitness center/gym which would open at 5:30 AM. There are homes in our neighborhood that are directly next to this tract and commercial use at such hours would be a major disruption with cars entering and leaving at these hours. In addition, plans call for an eating establishment. This might originally be something like a Tropical Smoothie but with the zoning change, any type of restaurant could be developed in this location. Highway 10 traffic is a nightmare now and this rezoning would create additional traffic concerns and make it more difficult to exit our neighborhood safely. With all of the schools located in this immediate area, this would also increase the problems for parents and schoolchildren. I do understand the need for business expansion but we need this buffer (office use) between our neighborhood and the commercial developments on the west side of the office area. There are currently vacant tracts on the west side of this area which are already zoned commercial and could be used for these proposed businesses. I feel there are sufficient reasons to deny this particular zoning variance request. Debbie Hayes 1 5417 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 501-425-2270 dhayes1123@gmail.com Carney, Dana From: SUSANNE LEWIS <susanneglewis@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:16 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberryl955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: Zoning & Subdivisions - Highway 10 Date:July 16, 2019 To: Planning and Development Commissioners From: Jim and Susanne Lewis 5515 Chevaux Ct Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Proposed Re -Zoning Variance As homeowners and residents of Chevaux Court Subdivision, my wife and I are extremely concerned with, and opposed to, the proposed Re -zoning Variance being proposed for the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court. This property currently consists of office building with a BanCorpSouth branch. The proposed plan that has been submitted to the Little Rock Planning Commission requests a new 8,000 sq. ft. building behind the bank, backing up to Chevaux Ct. Subdivision, with a zoning change to commercial for that new building. Chevaux Court property owners represented one of the first subdivisions to be built on Highway 10 across from The Ranch, and we have maintained strict standards thru our POA for our homes and community. Our opposition to this Re -Zoning variance is based on the following issues: - The Highway 10 Overlay Plan has already been developed and established and should continue to be the rule for any future planning. Allowing this new variance would be setting a dangerous precedent which unscrupulous developers will take advantage of, as they try to put even more businesses next to our subdivision. - Our residents in Chevaux Court are already facing increased traffic from the new Bank OZK offices and headquarters being built across the street, to the west from our subdivision. Allowing new businesses to build right next to the northwest corner of Chevaux Ct. will only exacerbate the traffic problem. - One of the new businesses will be a retail food establishment (type unknown), which will bring its own set of problems for us, including rodent infestations from garbage, late night hours, and noise issues. - Even if the builder promises barriers and fences next to our property, I can promise you those will fall into disrepair in a short period of time and will not be maintained. - Ultimately, our biggest concern is that our property values will be diminished. We do not want this variance to be approved and ask that you not approve this zoning change and variance. Please consider our concerns and vote against this proposed variance. Sincerely, Jim and Susanne Lewis Carney, Dana From: Earl D. Weniger <earl.weniger@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 11:59 AM Cc: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: Re: rezoning at 17705 Cantrell This is a duplicate of my earlier email to remind you of my objections. I live in Chevaux Court within 200 feet of the referenced property. Like everyone else here, I oppose this proposal and for the same reasons: traffic, noise and possible smells from the proposed restaurant's waste. My main fear concerns increased eastbound traffic from the restaurant and gym, on top of new Bank OZK headquarters traffic. This additional traffic, through the northeast corner exit of the POD property, will enter Cantrell very close to Chevaux Court's entrance. I foresee exiting vehicles, merging quickly into heavy traffic, endangering vehicles entering and exiting Chevaux Court. I doubt this POD curb cut would have been approved if the projected traffic load was then as heavy as it is now. This serious, predictable danger to our residents and visitors should justify keeping the current POD regulations. We understand the Planning Commission leans philosophically toward mixed use zoning. We are already part of a mixed use neighborhood with minimal interaction among their segments. There is commercial usage on Chenonceau near Cantrell and there will likely be more commercial use on their corners. Offices and a Bancorp South branch already exist. We are the residential component and will likely suffer from the greater traffic and noise with no corresponding benefits. I have lived in mixed use neighborhoods in Washington DC, Mexico City, Cambridge MA, and Manhattan. As fashionable and aspirational as the idea may sound, mixed use makes sense mostly in dense urban areas where people will walk to nearby restaurants, stores and offices. Our slice of Cantrell does not exactly welcome pedestrians. It is especially unlikely that our mostly -elderly Chevaux residents or anyone nearby will walk much to nearby businesses. The logic of an enforced mixed use concept fails here. What need or justification can there be for commercial uses imposing on our quiet residential neighborhood with no identifiable benefit to overcome the nuisance factors? Sincerely yours, Earl Weniger Subject: re -zoning variance A proposed re -zoning variance on a portion of the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court has been requested. The request is to change from an office zoning to a commercial zoning. I forcefully oppose this change. The Planning Commission members did a wonderful job on The Highway 10 Overlay Plan on planning the future growth of west Little Rock areas many years ago. They allow for future growth for commercial and residential. We have been able to keep one side of HWY 10 and area of quiet qrowth with homes and apartments and one story office buildings.This needs to continue. The traffic problem will be major with 4 big school, the opening of a big bank... just to mention a few. I would like to think this Planning Commission has the courage to stand up for what is right and refuse the zoning variance. The Highway 10 Overlay needs to be secure and not changed because Realtors want to make more money. There is property around for growth with out changing what was told to us..the Planning Commission will lose respect and confidence by the people of LR if they start changing what has already been established and told to us. Chevaux Office Park,17705 Cantrell, should remain as office zoning. Annis Hill 5611 Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Deborah <dwalz@att.net> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 3:18 PM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcgloba1.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana; Bill Sutton; Debbie Hayes; Stephanie9405@aol.com; Esther Rogers; glperritt@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: RE: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road This is a copy of the email I sent you before the June 6th Planning Commission meeting. My question "Why?" still has not been answered. Again, for a good mixture of businesses, the property at 17705 Cantrell Road needs to remain zoned as is. I will see you this Thursday at the Planning Commission meeting. Please do not support a zoning change. Deborah Walz From: Deborah Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 5:17 PM To: ca berry1955@gmail.com; brook_ Ir sbcglobaI.net; laydbee jay @gmail.com; sdanhI@gmail.com; mha nes 21cis.com; "tture@yahoo.com; bmay370sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbi ns@ att. net; ArkRealEstate @aol.com; rayogeIPgmail.com Cc: dcarnev@llttlerock.gQv; Bill Sutton; Debbie Hayes; Stephanie9405@aol.com; Esther Ro eggs; giperritt@gmail.com; Lancehines@me.com Subject: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road I have heard and read many reasons why the property at 17705 Cantrell Road should not be rezoned. They are all valid, such as devaluation of property especially after we built our houses based on the Highway 10 Overlay Plan which outlined quiet office businesses behind several of our homes. But my main question is ... Why? Why re -zone this property when there are several properties available within a half -mile radius already zoned for the type of businesses outlined in the new plan? Not only are there empty physical structures available (two in the building that currently houses NYPD Pizza) but there are also empty properties waiting to be developed. With so many properties currently available... why re -zone this particular piece of property? The answer is that there is no need for it to be re -zoned. Obviously, to have a good mixture of businesses in this area, we need to leave the property at 17705 Cantrell Road zoned as it is. Please vote no on a zoning change. Deborah Walz Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Dan <dhollan@att.net> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 3:06 PM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana; Director Hines; Bill Sutton; hayesdebbie1123@gmail.com; Stephanie Freeman; glperritt@gmail.com; Esther Rogers Subject: RE: Zoning change for Office Park @ 17705 Cantrell Road This is a copy of the email I sent you when the above agenda item was scheduled for your last meeting. I am resubmitting this email for your consideration during your next meeting scheduled for this coming Thursday, July 18. Be assured that I am just as opposed to this zoning change request now. We remain confident that you will continue to protect the residents of Chevaux Court and our neighbors during this unwarranted encroachment on our individual properties. Thank You. Dan Holland From: Dan Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 2:12 PM To: caberryl955@gmail.com; brock Iresbcglobal.net; laydbee,Lay@gmail.com; sdanhl@gmail,c_o_m; mhaynes@21cis.com; Platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravage!@gmail.com Cc: dcarnev@littlerock.gov; Lancehines@me.com; Bill Sutton; hayesdebbie1123@email.com; Stephanie Freeman; glperritt@gmail.com; Esther Rogers Subject: Zoning change for Office Park @ 17705 Cantrell Road My name is Dan Holland. My wife and I moved to Chevaux Court in 2008 after our retirements from UCA and Entergy respectively. The Chevaux Court Subdivision was an ideal choice for us for many reasons. One of those reasons was that the Highway 10 Overlay Plan provided assurances that the business development between our property and Cantrell Road would be dedicated to small office properties. We felt assured that our investment in our home would be a safe one. As you know, the developer has now proposed zoning changes to the Overlay Plan that will allow for the construction of commercial outlets to include a workout gym and a food service outlet. These types of businesses inherently bring with them many problems including excessive traffic, early morning and late evening noise, foul odors, rodents, etc. For these reasons I'm sure the original drafters of the Overlay Plan recognized the need to zone this property as small office to provide an appropriate buffer between Cantrell Road and Chevaux Court. There is plenty of space in this general area on both sides of Cantrell that are available and already zoned to accommodate this type of future commercial business. Therefore, there is no need to rezone this particular piece of property. Please do not allow this unwarranted revision in the Overlay Plan. The zoning change might potentially improve the value of this particular developer's investment in this lot, but only at the expense of over 100 homeowners' investments in their homes. Carney, Dana From: klcm <klcm@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 8:41 AM To: Carney, Dana; caberryl955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanhl@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Cc: Bill Sutton Subject: Zoning Variance -Chevaux Office Park Members of the Little Rock Planning Commission: This is follow-up reminder of my previous email of 5-31-19 stating that I am opposed to the proposed zoning change for Chevaux Office Park as described below: As you are aware, a zoning variance has been requested for a portion of Chevaux Office Park from POD (office) to PCD (commercial). Chevaux Office Park is contiguous to Chevaux Court Residential Subdivision. As a resident of Chevaux Court, I respectfully request that you decline the requested zoning variance. My concerns are as follows: • There is substantial property along highway 10 already zoned commercial, and I question the necessity to change the zoning for Chevaux Office Park to accommodate this commercial project immediately adjacent to a residential neighborhood. ■ Such a zoning change is going to exacerbate traffic congestion in the Chevaux Court area which will soon become even worse when the Bank OZK complex on the north side of Highway 10 is completed. • If this zoning change if granted, it will set a precedent for approval of future zoning variances in Chevaux Office Park. • 1 am concerned as to the types of commercial establishments which will be allowed into Chevaux Office Park (both initially and thereafter), and their effect on property values in Chevaux Court. Thank you for your consideration. Michael B. McKeown Carney, Dana From: Margaret Dawson <mhdawson@att.net> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2019 3:15 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21 cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law; wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Subject: Proposed Chevaux Office Park zoning variance. I am in opposition to the proposed zoning variance in the area just to our northwest. I feel it should remain as office zoning rather than giving a commercial variance. The huge OZK project nearby is already going to have a huge impact on this area. And I feel that allowing the proposed commercial zoning will add even more to traffic problems as well as other pollutants to our neighborhood having an overall negative impact for the Chevaux community. I ask that you all please give careful consideration and adhere to the Highway 10 Overlay Plan to keep our highway beautiful. Thank you. Margaret Dawson #30 Chevaux Circle Little Rock ,AR Sent from my Whone Carney, Dana From: Liz/John Phillips <coljphillips@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2019 3:48 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road We sent this when the previous meeting was scheduled and cancelled. We just wanted you all to know that our concerns are still valid and have not changed. RE: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road We strongly object to the rezoning of the above property from office to commercial. There are many reasons that we think this is a bad plan — setting a precedent and not following the Highway 10 Overlay Plan are two, but our main concern is the traffic safety in the area. With Wal-Mart Supercenter and Little Rock Christian School to the West, the new OZK Bank to the North and Arkansas Baptist directly across on Ranch Blvd, the traffic is dangerous now and will become more so when OZK opens. The Eastern driveway is too close to the light at Ranch Blvd. and the entrance to Chevaux Ct. We understand that a waiver was never requested for the distance variance, but the plans were approved anyway. There is not enough room now to get into the turn lane entering or exiting from the existing drive because of car stacking and speeding. It is already dangerous to use the center turn lane or as residents like to call it — "the suicide lane." The speed limit is this area is 50 mph, but we can assure you that this is a minimum speed. The proposed plan that has a Tropical Smoothie and a fitness center will certainly increase the number of cars entering and exiting from the existing drive. Any commercial building will have more traffic than an office building and it will certainly create a dangerous situation — especially with teenage drivers. Please do not approve the zoning variance. Liz and John Phillips 33 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Carney, Dana From: Kenny Henry <knnhenry4@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 5:46 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; Director Hines Cc: wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Subject: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road My wife and I live at 80 Chevaux Circle in Chevaux Court Subdivision. We are opposed to the rezoning of the subject property. We bought this property 8 1/2 years ago assuming the plan for Hwy 10 Scenic Corridor Overlay was one of the main objectives adopted by the City of Little Rock and pursuant to the authority granted under Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock providing overlay zoning districts to protect and enhance the aesthetic and visual character of the land surrounding Hwy 10. The rezoning of the subject property adjacent to Chevaux Court Subdivision would be in violation of the Design Overlay District Plan. We feel this will negatively effect our property value. Also, this will increase traffic volume and make it more difficult and hazardous to ingress and egress Chevaux Court Subdivision. Thank you for your consideration. Kenny and Janie Henry Carney, Dana From: Michel Leidermann <michelleidermann@arktimes.com> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 3:10 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law Subject: Re: AGAINST APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE To the members of the Little Rock Planning Commission: POINTS AGAINST APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE Developers have requested a variance to the current code in the commercial area on the business lot north of two current businesses and south of Bancorp South immediately to the west of the Chevaux entrance. It would change the code from low -traffic impact businesses to higher traffic businesses. The following points outline why Chevaux residents oppose this variance request 1. Increased Traffic to the immediate West: The new OZK development with 500 employees will increase traffic on Cantrell. This variance creates businesses with higher traffic making right turns onto Cantrell just to the west of the Chevaux entrance, which will increase the chances of traffic accidents involving Chevaux residents. 2. Decreased Property Values: Anything less than current coding restrictions will reduce property values for all homes in Chevaux and affect owners that that pay high real estate taxes 3. Planting Barriers: Offers to provide plantings and other landscaping blinds now sound good. However, the existing development had wonderful and expensive plantings initially and the commercial POA allowed most of them to die. They have never been replaced. 4. Fence Barriers: Another example of promises that were provided initially but not maintained: the commercial POA has the responsibility to maintain the fence alongside our neighborhood. The fence has never been maintained. The wood framework has rotted out, and the vertical slats fall off on a regular basis on both sides of the fence. A concerted effort has been put forth over time to influence them to repair this fence with no success. 5. Future Businesses: The proposed initial tenants of the strip mall are minimally relevant. Small businesses are more likely to fail than not. Once a lot is recoded, the door is open for any commercial business to go in. Chevaux's ability to impact those future businesses at that point is significantly eroded. The building currently housing NYPD Pizza is a good example of a revolving door for businesses, to include a BBQ joint that played loud bass music well into the night hours. 6. Restaurant Waste: A restaurant brings its own unique set of issues such as food disposal and smells and food in dumpsters attract rodents. Thank you for considering our opposition. Michel & Pam Leidermann 41 Chevaux Circle 501-868-4235 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Ite ©' on the agenda. I am opposed for 4_ Name Address S3 Z -1h c vac L-� e Q C/ Telephone No. J D Date I REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up -at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # Z `7 & D 5':: --ft �on the aenda. I am opposed L,-' for Name. Address 17. 1 P L6 "5, JA r. V- r Telephone No. S__t ? 6 2 Date 9 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS TAE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # �on the agenda. I am opposed for Name ft: f; L �K 1: j; I l L T_ S Address 5 ) A j $ rj � d Telephone No� J� ` J ` Date Carney, Dana From: Janet Bartos <jpb99@jpbmail.net> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2019 2:38 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: RE: 17705 Cantrell Rd Proposed Zoning Variance... To the Commissioners and others: As you can see we are back to protest another day ... Please review my previous email below and please know that our position has not changed with the 4 week delay. For all the reasons below, along with more which other neighbors have voiced to you, please do the right thing and keep the quiet office zoning in place. Thank you for your time that you devote to our city and I pray you keep the residents who live in this great city in mind at all times in your decisions. See you next Thursday, the 18th! Thank you, Janet & Phil Bartos From: Janet Bartos Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 3:21 PM Subject: 17705 Cantrell Rd Proposed Zoning Variance... Good afternoon, Ladies & Gentlemen, My husband, Phil, and I moved to Little Rock 13 yrs ago after falling in love with this unique Chevaux Court neighborhood 2 yrs prior. Even knowing at that time that Cantrell/Hwy 10 was to be developed commercially along its borders, we still loved Chevaux, as we understood that the development that cuts directly into the northwest corner of our neighborhood was zoned for QUIET office space.NO problem there. Fast forward all these years later, and here we are, fighting to protect that QUIET office zoning which in turn protects our neighborhood and especially those dozen or so homes that border the commercial development. WE could be your parents, grandparents, children or relatives, so please try to put yourselves in our situation. We don't oppose commercial development .... we all knew the Design Overlay District had been in place a while and thought that would help protect ALL properties along Cantrell from aggressive businesses who don't care about residents who were there f rst. We finally were given a traffic light at our entrance a couple of years ago, as the traffic in and out of and on Cantrell/Hwy 10 has grown enormously. But still we have issues getting in & out of our neighborhood safely, which is now going to grow tremendously again after the completion of the multi -phase development of BankOZK and added students at the new middle school. Still again, we thought the Planning Commission would help neighborhoods by looking at the safety issues associated with commercial development. We are all so very concerned with the traffic safety issues associated with the zoning change request to 17705 Cantrell, along with other issues of which the owners of the development have ignored over the past several years... decaying wood fence, dying trees that were code for barriers, barking dogs in their back yards, etc. Now it appears we may have to add more lighting coming into homes, increased traffic in the development to accommodate a fitness center opening at 5:30 am and closing at 8 pm, restaurant open until 10 pm, more noise, pollution & trash with a restaurant too. Please take a second look at your vote and decline the request on this proposal. Ask yourself, what would you do if you or your family member was in our situation? We respectfully request your NO vote! Thank you for your time and service to Little Rock, Janet & Phil Bartos, 75 Chevaux Circle Carney, Dana From: WFMullen <wfmullen@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2019 4:49 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: FW: rezoning at 17705 Cantrell -----Original Message - From: Winfred & Faye Mullen Mail to: wfmullen@comcast.net Sent: Saturday, July 5, 2019, 4:29 PM To: dcarney@littlerock.gov Subject: rezoning at 17705 Cantrell Dear Mr. Carney: Please share this will all current Board members. I want to go on record as a resident of Chevaux Court opposing the rezoning of the property at Chenonceau and Cantrell. We fought a similar battle several years ago when McDonald's wanted to go in on the corner there. The city forefathers gave their full consideration of what the proper use for this area should be. They were very brilliant men. They are no less brilliant now. I am only one about about 100 households who still feels this zoning decision was the proper one in the first place. It appears to be like Cinderella's Ugly Step Sisters trying to squeeze their huge, repulsive and appalling feet into a tiny and dainty glass slipper. Please save this area for something more fitting and stop trying to rezone and overdevelop this little piece of land. Sincerely, Winfred & Faye Mullen 12 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 501-868-1883 Carney, Dana From: Rosemary Studer <rosiestuder@sbcgloba1.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 1:34 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@ 21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ravogel@gmail.com; caberry1955@gmail.com Subject: ZoningVariance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road As a resident of this lovely neighborhood Chevaux Court, I strongly object to the proposed zoning variance for a portion of the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court. The Highway 10 Overlay Plan has been developed and should be adhered to. It should remain as office zoning rather than changed to commercial zoning. Once this Pandora's box is opened, the possibilities of what type restaurants, and other businesses could occupy this space are endless. Our property values will be greatly decreased. Imagine if this were your neighborhood and you faced these problems of increased traffic, noise, unmaintained barriers. There are surely other properties in more suitable areas on which these proposed businesses could be established. Sincerely Rosemary Studer 65 Chevaux Circle Sent from my iPad Carney, Dana From: SANDRA B. PALMER <sandrabpalmer@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 12:04 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: rezoning at 17705 Cantrell Dear Mr. Carney: Please share this will all current Board members. I want to go on record as a resident of Chevaux Court opposing the rezoning of the property at Chenonceau and Cantrell. We fought a similar battle several years ago when McDonald's wanted to go in on the corner there. The city forefathers gave their full consideration of what the proper use for this area should be. They were very brilliant men. They are no less brilliant now. I am only one about about 100 households who still feels this zoning decision was the proper one in the first place. It appears to be like Cinderella's Ugly Step Sisters trying to squeeze their huge, repulsive and appalling feet into a tiny and dainty glass slipper. Please save this area for something more fitting and stop trying to rezone and overdevelop this little piece of land. Sincerely, Sandra Palmer 5511 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 501-868-8806 Carney, Dana From: Kenneth McNeil <kennethmmcneil@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 7:18 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Rezoning on Cantrell Road Dana, Wanted to let you know of my opposition to the rezoning at 17705 Cantrell Road. Our neighborhoods will have plenty of traffic once the BOZ building opens, we don't need a high volume restaurant there as well. Thank you for your hard work and dedication to our fine city. Kenneth McNeil 4 Eds Lane Little Rock 72223 Carney, Dana From: Jane Williams <janeann.williams@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:26 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: 17705 Cantrell. Rezoning I am opposed to this. Traffic now is a nightmare and OZK headquarters hasn't opened yet. I live just west of this in one of Chenal neighborhoods. Please vote NO on this. Cantrell can't handle it. Thanks. J Williams Sent from Xfinity Connect Application Carney, Dana From: Brittany Wiley <brittanymwiley@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2019 9:35 AM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; arkrealestate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law Subject: Concerns on Rezoning near Chevaux Court Dear Dana Carney and the members of the Little Rock Planning Commission: I am a resident of Chevaux Court in West Little Rock. I understand that a proposed re -zoning variance has been requested for a portion of the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court. I want to express my concerns and my objections to this change in the zoning of this property. The homes In Chevaux Court, adjacent to the property in the proposed re -zoning, already have very little buffer zones from the noise and traffic from Cantrell and Chenonceau Streets Adding more commercial property will only worsen these conditions. Many of the residents in Chevaux Court chose this area for its safety and esthetic values. Increasing the commercial activities with expanded business hours will diminish these values. Additionally, restaurants and other commercial buildings will increase the amount of garbage and waste materials in dumpsters that can negatively impact residential areas. Currently, the bank and other businesses have fences that are poorly maintained and inadequately prevent the viewing into the backs of the homes adjacent to them I have safety concerns now and think they will worsen as more people are allowed in this area during longer periods of the day and night as the proposed businesses come into the area. I have made a significant investment in my home in Chevaux Court and would appreciate your help in preserving this neighborhood by denying this re -zoning. Sincerely, Brittany Wiley Carney, Dana From: Michel Leidermann <michelleidermann@arktimes.com> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 6:56 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcgloba1.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law Subject: AGAINST APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE To the members of the Little Rock Planning Commission: POINTS AGAINST APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE Developers have requested a variance to the current code in the commercial area on the business lot north of two current businesses and south of Bancorp South immediately to the west of the Chevaux entrance. It would change the code from low -traffic impact businesses to higher traffic businesses. The following points outline why Chevaux residents oppose this variance request. 1. Increased Traffic to the immediate West: The new OZK development with 500 employees will increase traffic on Cantrell. This variance creates businesses with higher traffic making right turns onto Cantrell just to the west of the Chevaux entrance, which will increase the chances of traffic accidents involving Chevaux residents. 2. Decreased Property Values: Anything less than current coding restrictions will reduce property values for all homes in Chevaux and affect owners that that pay high real estate taxes 3. Planting Barriers: Offers to provide plantings and other landscaping blinds now sound good. However, the existing development had wonderful and expensive plantings initially and the commercial POA allowed most of them to die. They have never been replaced. 4. Fence Barriers: Another example of promises that were provided initially but not maintained: the commercial POA has the responsibility to maintain the fence alongside our neighborhood. The fence has never been maintained. The wood framework has rotted out, and the vertical slats fall off on a regular basis on both sides of the fence. A concerted effort has been put forth over time to influence them to repair this fence with no success. 5. Future Businesses: The proposed initial tenants of the strip mall are minimally relevant. Small businesses are more likely to fail than not. Once a lot is recoded, the door is open for any commercial business to go in. Chevaux's ability to impact those future businesses at that point is significantly eroded. The building currently housing NYPD Pizza is a good example of a revolving door for businesses, to include a BBQ joint that played loud bass music well into the night hours. 6. Restaurant Waste: A restaurant brings its own unique set of issues such as food disposal and smells and food in dumpsters attract rodents. Thank you for considering our opposition. Michel & Pam Leidermann 41 Chevaux Circle 501-868-4235 Carney, Dana From: Carolyn Auffert <carolynauffert@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 5:48 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeeja@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37 @sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertstebbins@att.net; arkrealestate@aol.com; ravogel@gmal.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law; wsut43@sbcglobal.net; glperritt@gmail.com Subject: Proposed Zoning Variance 17705 Cantrell Rd. To: Little Rock Planning Commission, Dana Carney, and Lance Hines RE: Rezoning Request 17705 Cantrell Rd. From: Carolyn Sue Auffert (carolynauffert@yahoo.com) A little over a year ago I purchased a house in Chevaux Court which is currently a nice, quiet neighborhood comprised mostly of people over the age of 60 — most of us collect Social Security. About 40 % of the neighborhood is single women (many of us are widowed.) All of us have a significant financial stake in maintaining the value of our property. The proposed zoning variance at 17705 Cantrell requested by the developer is a direct threat to our property values. There are several reasons the variance is a threat to the security of this neighborhood. The two office buildings and BancCorpSouth are quiet and do not disturb our neighborhood. However, the Office Park at 17005 Cantrell is practically in our back yards. For example, my bedroom is 35 feet from the closest office building. Anyone standing on the proposed development site can easily see into several back yards and into the windows of the homes. The lack of privacy is appalling. Eight houses, including mine, are separated from the two office buildings only by a poorly maintained six-foot fence put up by the developer. With the variance in zoning, the commercialization of the property will greatly increase both the traffic and the noise coming from the Office Park. Businesses open from 7AM to 11PM will create a greater threat to our privacy through increased noise and traffic and will compromise our sense of security. The danger of increased traffic cannot be ignored. Since I have lived here, there have been several traffic accidents on Cantrell in front of BancCorpSouth and Chevaux Court. The distance between the stop light at Chenonceau and the light at Chevaux Court is a tenth of a mile. The proximity of The Ranch and the construction at Bank OZK will only increase the amount of traffic in a very small area. Turning across traffic is already extremely difficult, and with the number of speeding cars attempting to avoid stopping at a red light, it is dangerous! When the developer purchased the property, he was aware of the Highway 10 Overlay Plan, and he needs to abide by it! Rezoning the area will not only cause diminishing property values and invasion of privacy in our neighborhood, there is a very real safety issue which should be of great concern to the Planning Commission. I encourage the Planning Commission to protect our community and follow The Highway 10 Overlay Plan. Carney, Dana From: Paul Latture <platture@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:21 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Fwd: Re -Zoning Request for 17703 Cantrell Rd Another Sent from my iPhone 8 Begin forwarded message: From: Jack & Roselyn <jkandrss@a swbell.net> Date: May 29, 2019 at 9:31:37 PM CDT To: <R atture(a.yahoo.com> Subject: Re -Zoning Request for 17703 Cantrell Rd Reply -To: Jack & Roselyn cjkandrssCc@swbell.net7 Dear Planning commissioner Paul Latture: My name is John Stanley and I have been a resident of Chevaux Court for 11 years. We live in a quiet neighborhood generally inhabited with retired persons. I am very disturbed that a re -zoning of the property at the entrance to our subdivision has been requested to allow commercial establishments. The potential initial occupants are presumed to be a Smoothie Caf6 and an Exercise Facility. I am very much opposed to this re -zoning for several reasons: 1. The commercial establishments. 6. These factors all will have an adverse affect on our property values. Therefore, I am requesting that you deny this re -zoning request. increased traffic into and out of this area will produce a safety issue for us. 2. A restaurant produces waste which increases the rodent activity and causes odor problems. 3. The current tenets of this area have proven to be not trustworthy by failing to maintain plantings and fencing, by installing lighting that is not allowed by the Highway 10 DOD, and by installing a drive less than 300 feet from our entrance as required by the DOD. 4. The base of distrust causes us to fear that the stated initial tenets will soon be replaced by less desirable ones. 5. Also, the re -zoning to commercial will plant a commercial seed in the area that will continue to grow until we are totally surrounded with commercial businesses. Carney, Dana From: KENNETH TURNER <turner9191@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 3:51 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: sgiles@ddl.law Subject: Re -zoning Property on Cantrell Rd/Highway 10 Dear Mr. Carney and Members of Little Rock Planning and Development Department, Ken and I have lived in Chevaux Court since 2000. We are very much against changing the zoning variance request that connects Chevaux property. The traffic on Highway 10/ Cantrell Road is extremely heavy and even with a stop light at the entrance to Chevaux it is hard to turn left safety into our area. We think cars going into the area to be re -zoned would be dangerous - especially with a restaurant in the commercial area. If the property is allowed to be re -zoned it will open the area for future businesses and would decrease our property values. We would appreciate your listening to the opposition that is voiced by the residents of Chevaux before agreeing to re -zone this property. Sincerely, Ken and Cathey Turner 19 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 1 Carney, Dana From: Margaret Dawson <mhdawson@att.net> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 10:40 AM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law; wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Subject: Proposed Chevaux Office Park zoning variance. I am in opposition to the proposed zoning variance in the area just to our northwest. I feel it should remain as office zoning rather than giving a commercial variance. The huge OZK project nearby is already going to have a huge impact on this area. And I feel that allowing the proposed commercial zoning will add even more to traffic problems as well as other pollutants to our neighborhood having an overall negative impact for the Chevaux community. I ask that you all please give careful consideration and adhere to the Highway 10 Overlay Plan to keep our highway beautiful. Thank you. Margaret Dawson #30 Chevaux Circle Little Rock ,AR Sent from my Whone Carney, Dana From: D L Pyle <d.pyle@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 9:08 AM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21 cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Carney, Dana Subject: Proposed re -zoning for 17705 Cantrell Road - would ask that you read prior to your discussions on 4/25 Dear Commissioners, As a long-time resident of Little Rock, let me start by thanking you for serving on the Little Rock Planning Commission. As you know much better than me, you face many positive but often difficult situations and your giving of your knowledge and time to serve all of us is much appreciated! The purpose of my communication is to express my opposition to a re -zoning request that you will hear on Thursday, April 25. The request is a change of classification from a POD District to a PCD for the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road. I am a resident of Chevaux Court (since 2003), and the proposed area is immediately to the west of Chevaux. Chevaux is a wonderful neighborhood, and the residents are committed to keeping this neighborhood welcoming, appealing, safe, quiet and a place others would want to consider in their moving decisions. I believe strongly, as do all of my neighbors, that this request would negatively impact the quality of life we have worked so hard to create. Every decision to move into this neighborhood and/or remain in this neighborhood (as well as any neighborhood in LR) is impacted by our city laws ... in this case specifically our city zoning laws. These zoning laws were decided because the then city commissioners understood the importance of creating and protecting our residential neighborhoods for current needs and as the city continued to grow. We are not a neighborhood that opposes growth, but in this situation we have very specific reasons for opposing this request. Deborah Walz and Dan Holland took the time to outline 8 reasons that this proposed re -zoning would create a negative impact on Chevaux, and I think this specific information will be very beneficial in your review. I am including these reasons below. Please let me know if you have questions or need more information. We are proud to call Little Rock our home and hope for many years in the future to be proud to call Chevaux Court our home. Thank you for considering my input. Best regards, Debbie Pyle d.pyle@sbcjzlobal.net 501-231-3002 ************************************************************************* Why the re -zoning request would negatively impact the residents of Chevaux Court: 1. The current overlay plan provides for appropriate protection of our neighborhood by providing for low -impact businesses. 2. Setting a Precedent: A coding concession for any particular lot within the development now sets the precedent for every coding variance that will inevitably be requested in the future. 3. Planting Barriers: Offers to provide plantings and other landscaping blinds now sound good. However, the existing development had wonderful and expensive plantings initially and the commercial POA allowed most of them to die. They have never been replaced. 4. Fence Barriers: Another example of landscaping promises that are provided initially but not maintained: The commercial POA has the responsibility to maintain the fence alongside our neighborhood. The fence has never been maintained. The wood framework has rotted out, and the vertical slats fall off on a regular basis on both sides of the fence. A concerted effort has been put forth over time to influence them to repair this fence with no success. 5. Future Businesses: The proposed initial tenants of the strip mall are minimally relevant. Small businesses are more likely to fail than not. Once a lot is recoded, the door is open for any commercial business to go in. Chevaux's ability to impact those future businesses at that point is significantly eroded. 6. The building currently housing NYPD pizza is a good example of what we do not want. It's been a revolving door for businesses, to include a BBQ joint that played loud bass music well into the night hours. 7. Increased Traffic to the immediate West: The new OZK development will increase traffic on Cantrell. However, that traffic enters and exits Cantrell much further west. This variance creates businesses with higher traffic making right turns onto Cantrell just to the west of the Chevaux entrance, which will increase the chances of traffic accidents involving Chevaux residents. 8. Decreased Property Values: Anything less that current coding restrictions will reduce property values for all homes in Chevaux. Many people, both friends and neighbors who have bought here, have commented that they thought the current two buildings were large houses rather than businesses and they have been favorably impressed. However, entering our neighborhood with its great entrance and nice houses will be negatively impacted with the clear view to the right (after the planting barrier has died off) of a strip mall. Carney, Dana From: Deborah <dwalz@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 1:05 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Subject: Re -zoning Request on 17705 Cantrell Road Attachments: 2019 Request of Overlay plan variance.docx Thank you for your service on the Planning Commission. Having worked with the Planning Commission in another city on various projects, I know how much work and detail goes into making a decision. I also know how important it is to hear from the citizens of the community who may have a different perspective. When we first heard about this re -zoning request, my husband and I (an engineer and educator) decided to organize our thoughts. We developed 8 reasons why we oppose the request, and shared them with our neighbors. We would also like to share them with you. Please see the attached document and, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. We will see you Thursday night at the commission meeting. Sincerely, Deborah Walz and Dan Holland 87 Chevaux Circle POINTS AGAINST APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE ON LOTS 2 AND 3, CHEVAUX OFFICE PARK 17,705 CANTRELL ROAD Developers have requested a variance to the current code in the commercial area immediately to the west of the Chevaux entrance. It would change the code from low -traffic impact businesses to higher traffic businesses. The following 8 points outline why Chevaux residents should organize and oppose this variance request. 1. The current Overlay Plan provides for appropriate protection of our neighborhood by providing for low -impact businesses. 2. Setting a Precedent: A coding concession for any particular lot within the development now sets the precedent for every coding variance that will inevitably be requested in the future. 3. Increased Traffic to the immediate West: The new OZK development will increase traffic on Cantrell. However, that traffic enters and exits Cantrell much further west. This variance creates businesses with higher traffic making right turns onto Cantrell just to the west of the Chevaux entrance, which will increase the chances of traffic accidents involving Chevaux residents. 4. Decreased Property Values: Anything less than current coding restrictions will reduce property values for all homes in Chevaux. Many people, both friends and neighbors who have bought here, have commented that they thought the current two buildings were large houses rather than businesses and they have been favorably impressed. However, entering our neighborhood with its great entrance and nice houses will be negatively impacted with the clear view to the right of a strip mall. Planting Barriers: Offers to provide plantings and other landscaping blinds now sound good. However, the existing development had wonderful and expensive plantings initially and the commercial POA allowed most of them to die. They have never been replaced. 6. Fence Barriers: Another example of landscaping promises that were provided initially but not maintained: the commercial POA has the responsibility to maintain the fence alongside our neighborhood. The fence has never been maintained. The wood framework has rotted out, and the vertical slats fall off on a regular basis on both sides of the fence. A concerted effort has been put forth over time to influence them to repair this fence with no success. 7. Future Businesses: The proposed initial tenants of the strip mall are minimally relevant. Small businesses are more likely to fail than not. Once a lot is recoded, the door is open for any commercial business to go in. Chevaux's ability to impact those future businesses at that point is significantly eroded. The building currently housing NYPD Pizza is a good example of what we do not want. It's been a revolving door for businesses, to include a BBQ joint that played loud bass music well into the night hours. 8. Restaurant Waste: A restaurant brings its own unique set of issues such as food disposal and smells. Regardless of whether it is something like a Tropical Smoothie or whatever future restaurant, food in dumpsters attract rodents. Anyone who would like to see (smell) the impact of having a dumpster for restaurant waste can check out NYPD's dumpster. Carney, Dana From: Ruthann Strickland <rannstrickland@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 6:52 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Concerns of Chevaux Property Owners As a resident of Chevaux Circle, I am concerned about how the rezoning and traffic will affect my property value and safety of the public, as traffic flow is increased. Please understand and consider our concerns as existing, adjacent neighbors. Thanks for making sure city growth and change does not affect our safety and aesthetics of a very special residential area! Sincerely, Ruthann Strickland C-479-586-9278 rannstrickland@yahoo.com 72 Chevaux Circle Lt Rock, AR 72223 Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone Carney, Dana From: Sharon Williams <sannwilliams@att.net> Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 12:12 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Zoning in the Chevaux Court (Highway 10) Area Dear Mr. Carney, When I was looking for a new home ten years ago, I was attracted to the quiet beauty of the Cantrell Road area in west Little Rock. When I chose Chevaux Court, I was told that future development in the area would be controlled by the Cantrell (Highway 10) District Overlay which called for quiet, office -type buildings. Now, there is a request to permit commercial zoning near Chevaux Court. This type of zoning could permit a hotel, fast food restaurant, fitness center, etc. Commercial development so close to Chevaux Court would be detrimental to the residents. This area of Cantrell Road already has enormous amounts of traffic which results in greater noise. I respectfully request that you use your influence to prevent rezoning of the Cantrell Road area to commercial development. Please honor the original Cantrell (Highway 10) District Overlay Plan. Thank you for your help in this matter. Best regards, Sharon A. Williams 51 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 cc: Commissioners, Little Rock Planning Commission Carney, Dana From: John S. Anthony <jsaflash @att.net> Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2019 12:55 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: sgiles@ddh.law; Janet Bartos Subject: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road The purpose of this memo is to tell you that my wife, Nancy, and I oppose the rezoning of the property listed above. We moved to the Chevaux Court neighborhood in May 2012. We downsized from a larger home. We knew the zoning requirements of the property at 17705 Cantrell Road when we purchased our house and I am fairly sure the owners of that property knew it was not zoned Commercial early on. Now, to approve a zoning variance of the property and allow a retail food establishment, a fitness/workout facility and future retail businesses to move in will hurt our property values and will set a precedent that will continue to hurt our neighborhood. Thank you for your help. John & Nancy Anthony 64 Chevaux Circle 501-868-8098 Subject: re -zoning variance A proposed re -zoning variance on a portion of the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court has been requested. The request is to change from an office zoning to a commercial zoning. I forcefully oppose this change. The Planning Commission members did a wonderful job on The Highway 10 Overlay Plan on planning the future growth of west Little Rock areas many years ago. They allow for future growth for commercial and residential. We have been able to keep one side of HWY 10 and area of quiet qrowth with homes and apartments and one story office buildings.This needs to continue. The traffic problem will be major with 4 big school, the opening of a big bank... just to mention a few. I would like to think this Planning Commission has the courage to stand up for what is right and refuse the zoning variance. The Highway 10 Overlay needs to be secure and not changed because Realtors want to make more money. There is property around for growth with out changing what was told to us..the Planning Commission will lose respect and confidence by the people of LR if they start changing what has already been established and told to us. Chevaux Office Park,17705 Cantrell, should remain as office zoning. Annis Hill 5611 Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Deborah <dwalz@att.net> Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 5:17 PM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana; Bill Sutton; Debbie Hayes; Stephanie9405@aol.com; Esther Rogers; glperritt@gmail.com; Director Hines Subject: Zoning Variance for 17705 Cantrell Road I have heard and read many reasons why the property at 17705 Cantrell Road should not be rezoned. They are all valid, such as devaluation of property especially after we built our houses based on the Highway 10 Overlay Plan which outlined quiet office businesses behind several of our homes. But my main question is ... Why? Why re -zone this property when there are several properties available within a half -mile radius already zoned for the type of businesses outlined in the new plan? Not only are there empty physical structures available (two in the building that currently houses NYPD Pizza) but there are also empty properties waiting to be developed. With so many properties currently available... why re -zone this particular piece of property? The answer is that there is no need for it to be re -zoned. Obviously, to have a good mixture of businesses in this area, we need to leave the property at 17705 Cantrell Road zoned as it is. Please vote no on a zoning change. Deborah Walz Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: Stephanie Freeman <stephanie9405@aol.com> Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 7:05 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; wsutt43@sbcglobal.net; glperritt@gmail.com; hayesdebbie1123 @gmail.com; estherrogers@me.com; sgiles@ddh.law Subject: File Z -7605-D; 17705 Cantrell Road Mr. Carney: My name is Stephanie Freeman. I ant a resident of Chevaux Court and serve on the board of the associated Property Owners' Association. The purpose of this correspondence is to make known my objection to the proposed rezoning of the adjacent Chevaux Office Park from POD to PCD. Residents of this quiet subdivision purchased our property trusting that the adjacent property would remain zoned only for quiet office. This proposal to change to commercial zoning requests hours of operation for tenants ranging from 5:30 am to 10 pm. This request only addresses the known potential tenants, and opens the door to even more extreme hours for future tenants. Commercial tenants such as restaurants will certainly increase noise and traffic in the area, and 1 trash associated with food service attracts rodents to the area. Residents are objecting because we feel this zoning change will have a negative impact on our existing quality of life, and we also feel it will have a negative impact on our future property value. In preparation for attending the Planning Commission meeting to be held June 6, 1 pulled from the Commission website the file associated with Item D, File Z -7605-D. The last paragraph of that file discusses the April 25, 2019 meeting. I had planned to attend that April 25 meeting, but received a phone call late on the evening of April 24 that this item would be deferred to June 6, and that there was no need to attend. The following is included in the report, which is now obviously public record: "The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present." That there were no objectors present is true, however at least 44 objectors had planned to be there, but were told the proposal would not be discussed. I believe that a reasonable person who reads the statement "There were no registered objectors present" would infer there are no objectors, or that z objections were so minor a trip downtown wasn't warranted. That is simply not true, and many of us do plan to attend June 6 to clear up any confusion regarding our position. Thank you for consideration of my objection. Stephanie Freeman 3 Carney, Dana From: Liz/John Phillips <coljphillips@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2019 7:12 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: sgiles@ddh.law; Sutton, Bill Subject: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road RE: Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Office Park, 17705 Cantrell Road We strongly object to the rezoning of the above property from office to commercial. There are many reasons that we think this is a bad plan — setting a precedent and not following the Highway 10 Overlay Plan are two, but our main concern is the traffic safety in the area. With Wal-Mart Supercenter and Little Rock Christian School to the West, the new OZK Bank to the North and Arkansas Baptist directly across on Ranch Blvd, the traffic is dangerous now and will become more so when OZK opens. The Eastern driveway is too close to the light at Ranch Blvd. and the entrance to Chevaux Ct. We understand that a waiver was never requested for the distance variance, but the plans were approved anyway. There is not enough room now to get into the turn lane entering or exiting from the existing drive because of car stacking and speeding. It is already dangerous to use the center turn lane or as residents like to call it — "the suicide lane." The speed limit is this area is 50 mph, but we can assure you that this is a minimum speed. The proposed plan that has a Tropical Smoothie and a fitness center will certainly increase the number of cars entering and exiting from the existing drive. Any commercial building will have more traffic than an office building and it will certainly create a dangerous situation — especially with teenage drivers. Please do not approve the zoning variance. Liz and John Phillips 33 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Carney, Dana From: klcm <klcm@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:08 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Bill Sutton Subject: Zoning variance -Chevaux Office Park Members of the Little Rock Planning Commission: As you are aware, a zoning variance has been requested for a portion of Chevaux Office Park from POD (office) to PCD (commercial). Chevaux Office Park is contiguous to Chevaux Court Residential Subdivision. As a resident of Chevaux Court, I respectfully request that you decline the requested zoning variance. My concerns are as follows: • There is substantial property along highway 10 already zoned commercial, and I question the necessity to change the zoning to accommodate this commercial project immediately adjacent to a residential neighborhood. Such a zoning change is going to exacerbate traffic congestion in the Chevaux Court area which will soon become even worse when the Bank OZK complex on the north side of Highway 10 is completed. ■ If this zoning change if granted, it will set a precedent for approval of future zoning variances in Chevaux Office Park. 1 am concerned as to the types of commercial establishments which will be allowed into Chevaux Office Park and their effect on property values in Chevaux Court. Thank you for your consideration. Michael B. McKeown Carney, Dana From: Dan <dhollan@att.net> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 2:13 PM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcgloba1.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: Carney, Dana; Director Hines; Bill Sutton; hayesdebbie1123@gmail.com; Stephanie Freeman; glperritt@gmail.com; Esther Rogers Subject: Zoning change for Office Park @ 17705 Cantrell Road My name is Dan Holland. My wife and I moved to Chevaux Court in 2008 after our retirements from UCA and Entergy respectively. The Chevaux Court Subdivision was an ideal choice for us for many reasons. One of those reasons was that the Highway 10 Overlay Plan provided assurances that the business development between our property and Cantrell Road would be dedicated to small office properties. We felt assured that our investment in our home would be a safe one. As you know, the developer has now proposed zoning changes to the Overlay Plan that will allow for the construction of commercial outlets to include a workout gym and a food service outlet. These types of businesses inherently bring with them many problems including excessive traffic, early morning and late evening noise, foul odors, rodents, etc. For these reasons I'm sure the original drafters of the Overlay Plan recognized the need to zone this property as small office to provide an appropriate buffer between Cantrell Road and Chevaux Court. There is plenty of space in this general area on both sides of Cantrell that are available and already zoned to accommodate this type of future commercial business. Therefore, there is no need to rezone this particular piece of property. Please do not allow this unwarranted revision in the Overlay Plan. The zoning change might potentially improve the value of this particular developer's investment in this lot, but only at the expense of over 100 homeowners' investments in their homes. Carney, Dana From: Jackie Whittaker <jwhitt011 @sbcglobal.net> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 1:50 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Subject: Re -zoning Hwy 10 As residents of Chevaux Court, we would like for you to please vote against the re -zoning of Highway 10 in the Johnson Ranch area. The increased traffic has already caused many problems and we are very concerned for the many children attending one of the three large schools in this area. This is only going to make it worse. Many residents used their lifelong savings to move out here 15-20 years ago, thinking it would never be another Rodney Parham! We would certainly see a decrease in our property values. Please do not allow this to happen. There are plenty of other areas along Hwy 10 that could be used for restaurants .... that do not interfere with these family neighborhoods and school areas. We ask that you please keep it as a low office building zoning classification and keep the Highway 10 plan the way it was originally meant to be. Thank You. George and Jackie Whittaker #5 Chevaux Court Carney, Dana From: sharonjwlms@aol.com Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:22 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Rezoning Variance Request for NW corner of Chevaux Count Mr. Carney, I request that you provide the Planning Commission with this information as soon as possible. Thank you, Sharon Williams 31 Chevaux Circle To: Little Rock Planning Commission Members As a Little Rock resident almost all of my life and a 20 year resident of Chevaux Court, I want you to know that I am not in favor of granting the rezoning variance request from office to commercial for the northwest corner of Chevaux Court for a number of reasons. My primary concern is that once the variance to commercial has been granted, there is no control over what businesses will move into the spaces in the in the future. My husband and I do not want to sacrifice our quiet and peaceful community to commercial interests. I also have grave concerns that the increase in commercial traffic will be a threat to public safety affecting all motorists, but especially residents of the area and children attending the many schools that use the section of Cantrell Road regularly. Traffic issues were key reasons a previous development was denied by the Board of Directors. I urge the Planning Commission members to consider these important factors in their decision on the variance request. Sharon Williams 31 Chevaux Circle Carney, Dana From: Andy Byrd <andybyrd12@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:57 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Re -zoning variance - northwest corner of Chevaux Court Commissioners: My wife and I join our neighbors and endorse their request that the proposed zoning change to commercial not be approved. The existing office zoning is much more compatible to a residential community in which so many have invested their retirement dollars. The neighbors immediately adjacent to subject property are also very aware of the rotting fence and dead trees that were included in the original construction project. We respectfully ask that our request be considered in this deliberation. Andy & Beth Byrd 68 Chevaux Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 Carney, Dana From: John Allison <jallisonart@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:28 AM To: Carney, Dana Cc: Bill Sutton 'Subject: Chevaux Ct. Rezoning Hi Dana, Hope all is well with you and the staff! I'm contacting you concerning the proposed rezoning of the POD just west and contiguous to the Chevaux Court subdivision. My house is adjacent to the development with visibility to the office buildings. My main concern, however, is with the probability of increased traffic due to the proposed Tropical Smoothie (or any restaurant, or commercial use). I'm sure it will be a very popular and well - used destination due to students from 7 or so schools and the new Bank OZK headquarters complex. Currently, there is an entrance drive to that development approximately 60-80' from the entrance to Chevaux. This causes a bottleneck for east -heading traffic, and is a dangerous left turn complication. Going west on Cantrell, and attempting to turn left into our neighborhood is already extremely hazardous due to our left turn signal not being activated. It's a game of "chicken" to find an opening in east -heading traffic to turn left, especially during morning and evening hours. With almost all senior (even elderly) residents, the condition is even more dangerous. There have been multiple collisions here as your records will indicate. This condition will only worsen with a commercial use being located in what is now a quiet office development with minimal traffic. I'm certain you will take the neighborhood's opposition to the rezoning very seriously. Thank you for your consideration! Sincerely, John Allison, AIA Emeritus ALLISON + PARTNERS 200 West Capitol Ave., Suite 1400 Little Rock, AR 72201 501.376.0717 www.allisonarchitects.com Carney, Dana From: Jim Lewis <lewisjimmyd@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:22 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Re -Zoning Variance Request for Chevaux Ct. Attachments: Rezoning email.docx Dear Dana, Attached is a letter to you and the staff of the Little Rock Planning and Development Department referencing a proposed re -zoning variance for property on the Northwest corner of Chevaux Court. If you have any questions related to this letter from my wife and myself, please feel free to call my cell phone: 501-690-0384. Thank you for your consideration. Jim Lewis Date: 5/30/19 To: Dana Carney Zoning and Subdivisions From: Jim and Susanne Lewis 5515 Chevaux Ct Little Rock, AR 72223 Re: Proposed Re -Zoning Variance As homeowners and residents of Chevaux Court Subdivision, my wife and I are extremely concerned with, and opposed to, the proposed Re -zoning Variance being proposed for the property on the northwest corner of Chevaux Court. This property currently consists of office building with a BanCorpSouth branch. The proposed plan that has been submitted to the Little Rock Planning Commission requests a new 8,000 sq. ft. building behind the bank, backing up to Chevaux Ct. Subdivision, with a zoning change to commercial for that new building. Chevaux Court property owners represented one of the first subdivisions to be built on Highway 10 across from The Ranch, and we have maintained strict standards thru our POA for our homes and community. Our opposition to this Re -Zoning variance is based on the following issues: - The Highway 10 Overlay Plan has already been developed and established and should continue to be the rule for any future planning. Allowing this new variance would be setting a dangerous precedent which unscrupulous developers will take advantage of, as they try to put even more businesses next to our subdivision. - Our residents in Chevaux Court are already facing increased traffic from the new Bank of the Ozarks offices and headquarters being built across the street, to the west from our subdivision. Allowing new businesses to build right next to the northwest corner of Chevaux Ct. will only exacerbate the traffic problem. - One of the new businesses will be a retail food establishment (type unknown), which will bring its own set of problems for us, including rodent infestations from garbage, late night hours, and noise issues. - Even if the builder promises barriers and fences next to our property, I can promise you those will fall into disrepair in a short period of time and will not be maintained. - Ultimately, our biggest concern is that our property values will be diminished. We do not want this variance to be approved and ask that you not approve this zoning change and variance. Please consider our concerns and vote against this proposed variance. James D. Lewis Susanne G. Lewis Carney, Dana From: Sandy Cobb <sktcobb@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 6:44 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: rezoning of 17705 cantrell road This property is about 100ft. from the back of my home in Chevaux Ct. and is raised about 6ft. above my property, its a fish bowl view. the lights and noise is already a problem. There is a illegal drive going on to cantrell rd. on the east side about 125ft. from our light and drive in to Chevaux Ct. Rezoning this property will create more traffic and safety issues at our intersection, When i built my house 6 years a go i was assured that the zoning would remain office space only, If zoning is changed we will have no control of what is put in the future, Please do not approve rezoning. Thank you, Sandra Cobb 5704 Chevaux t. Carney, Dana From: D L Pyle <d.pyle@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 9:27 PM To: caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1 @gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com; Carney, Dana Subject: Re: Proposed re -zoning for 17705 Cantrell Road - would ask that you read prior to your discussions on 4/25 Dear Commissioners, Prior to the April 25th meeting, I sent the note below sharing my opposition to the re -zoning request. Because that meeting was cancelled, I am re -sending my note and asking you to read and consider in your decision making process next week. One point I did not cover in my original note, and wish to do so now, addresses a comment I have heard stated - we want neighborhoods where you can live and also walk to local restaurants. We live on Highway 10 where the traffic is heavy and the speed limit is 50+. Walking to a neighborhood restaurant would not be easy nor would it be safe. I will close with one last thought - the Design Overlay District - Highway 10 Scenic Corridor was created by a city staff and planning commission much like yourselves with the intent that these zoning laws would drive the right decisions both present and future. After reading Sec 36-343 in this document, I think their vision was smart, well designed and clearly articulated. I hope you will support your predecessors and their vision for a desirable scenic corridor and make the decision to uphold the current zoning laws. Thank you for considering my request. Best regards, Debbie Pyle d.pyle@sbeglobal.net 501-231-3002 On Apr 24, 2019, at 9:07 AM, D L Pyle <d.pvle7sbcglob�al.net> wrote: Dear Commissioners, As a long-time resident of Little Rock, let me start by thanking you for serving on the Little Rock Planning Commission. As you know much better than me, you face many positive but often difficult situations and your giving of your knowledge and time to serve all of us is much appreciated! The purpose of my communication is to express my opposition to a re -zoning request that you will hear on Thursday, April 25. The request is a change of classification from a POD District to a PCD for the property located at 17705 Cantrell Road. I am a resident of Chevaux Court (since 2003), and the proposed area is immediately to the west of Chevaux. Chevaux is a wonderful neighborhood, and the residents are committed to keeping this neighborhood welcoming, appealing, safe, quiet and a place others would want to consider in their moving decisions. I believe strongly, as do all of my neighbors, that this request would negatively impact the quality of life we have worked so hard to create. Every decision to move into this neighborhood and/or remain in this neighborhood (as well as any neighborhood in LR) is impacted by our city laws ... in this case specifically our city zoning laws. These zoning laws were decided because the then city commissioners understood the importance of creating and protecting our residential neighborhoods for current needs and as the city continued to grow. We are not a neighborhood that opposes growth, but in this situation we have very specific reasons for opposing this request. Deborah Walz and Dan Holland took the time to outline 8 reasons that this proposed re -zoning would create a negative impact on Chevaux, and I think this specific information will be very beneficial in your review. I am including these reasons below. Please let me know if you have questions or need more information. We are proud to call Little Rock our home and hope for many years in the future to be proud to call Chevaux Court our home. Thank you for considering my input. Best regards, Debbie Pyle dd. nvle@sbcgl obal . net 501-231-3002 Why the re -zoning request would negatively impact the residents of Chevaux Court: 1. The current overlay plan provides for appropriate protection of our neighborhood by providing for low -impact businesses. 2. Setting a Precedent: A coding concession for any particular lot within the development now sets the precedent for every coding variance that will inevitably be requested in the future. 3. Planting Barriers: Offers to provide plantings and other landscaping blinds now sound good. However, the existing development had wonderful and expensive plantings initially and the commercial POA allowed most of them to die. They have never been replaced. 4. Fence Barriers: Another example of landscaping promises that are provided initially but not maintained: The commercial POA has the responsibility to maintain the fence alongside our neighborhood. The fence has never been maintained. The wood framework has rotted out, and the vertical slats fall off on a regular basis on both sides of the fence. A concerted effort has been put forth over time to influence them to repair this fence with no success. 5. Future Businesses: The proposed initial tenants of the strip mall are minimally relevant. Small businesses are more likely to fail than not. Once a lot is recoded, the door is open for any commercial business to go in. Chevaux's ability to impact those future businesses at that point is significantly eroded. 6. The building currently housing NYPD pizza is a good example of what we do not want. It's been a revolving door for businesses, to include a BBQ joint that played loud bass music well into the night hours. 7. Increased Traffic to the immediate West: The new OZK development will increase traffic on Cantrell. However, that traffic enters and exits Cantrell much further west. This variance creates businesses with higher traffic making right turns onto Cantrell just to the west of the Chevaux entrance, which will increase the chances of traffic accidents involving Chevaux residents. 8. Decreased Property Values: Anything less that current coding restrictions will reduce property values for all homes in Chevaux. Many people, both friends and neighbors who have bought here, have commented that they thought the current two buildings were large houses rather than businesses and they have been favorably impressed. However, entering our neighborhood with its great entrance and nice houses will be negatively impacted with the clear view to the right (after the planting barrier has died off) of a strip mall. Carney, Dana From: Debbie <hayesdebbie1123@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 8:42 PM To: Carney, Dana Cc: Director Hines Subject: Little Rock Rezoning Request - Highway 101ance I am a resident of Chevaux Court subdivision in west Little Rock and am very concerned about a proposed zoning variance on the property adjacent to our neighborhood. The property on the northwest corner of our neighborhood is currently zoned for office use and consists of office condominiums plus a BancorpSouth branch (17703 Cantrell Road). We have been notified of a proposed rezoning variance which would provide for a new building in the middle of that complex to be zoned as commercial. This proposal appears to be in conflict with the Design Overlay District for Highway 10 and would be extremely disruptive to our neighborhood. It does not make sense to rezone a portion of a tract that is now zoned for office use. We were originally told that a portion of the building would be a physical therapy center but upon additional questioning it appears this would actually be a fitness center/gym which would open at 5:30 AM. There are homes in our neighborhood that are directly next to this tract and commercial use at such hours would be a major disruption with cars entering and leaving at these hours. In addition, plans call for an eating establishment. This might originally be something like a Tropical Smoothie but with the zoning change, any type of restaurant could be developed in this location. Highway 10 traffic is a nightmare now and this rezoning would create additional traffic concerns and make it more difficult to exit our neighborhood safely. With all of the schools located in this immediate area, this would also increase the problems for parents and schoolchildren. I do understand the need for business expansion but we need this buffer (office use) between our neighborhood and the commercial developments on the west side of the office area. There are currently vacant tracts on the west side of this area which are already zoned commercial and could be used for these proposed businesses. Please express my concerns to the members of the Planning Commission and to your staff. I would really appreciate a denial of this particular zoning variance request. Debbie Hayes 5417 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 501-425-2270 dhayes1123@gmail.com JOHN B. PLEGGE CIRCUIT JUDGE - RETIRED 200 RIVER MARKET AVENUE, SUITE 200 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1769 TELEPHONE: (501) 372-1406 FACSIMILE: (501) 372-1209 jplegge@wdt-law.com June 13, 2019 Mr. D. Carney Director Little Rock Planning & Development Department Little Rock City Hall 500 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Carney; I am a resident of Chevaux Court subdivision and have been since the year 2000. My wife and I, along with all of our neighbors, enjoy this peaceful, quiet neighborhood full of friends and neighbors. Prior to purchasing this property, I looked at and studied the Bill of Assurance attached to the use of the property and also became of aware of the Department of Transportation Highway 10 plan. Because of these factors, I was satisfied that there would be no encroachment of commercial purposes next to our neighborhood. I am now told that the Planning Commission has been asked to re -zone property which adjoins Chevaux Court. I am absolutely opposed any change in the zoning which might possible affect our use and enjoyment of the property which many of us have bought and owned for more than two decades. Please share this information with your other commission members, even though I am sending them each a copy of this memo. I would appreciate your strong consideration of denying this request for re- zoning. Si z r y John Plegge CC: sgiles@ddh.law, Bill Sutton: wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Craig Berry: caberry1955@gmail.com, Thomas Brock: brock_lr@sbcglobal.net, Beulah Bynam: laydbeejay@gmail.com, Scott Hamilton: sdanh@gmail.com, Marlon Hayes: mhaynes#@https://linkprotect.cudasvc.coni/url?a=https%3a%2P/o2f21 cjs.com&c=E,1,ngG-x9AkZTbd 261 hYofAh8suA_1zCdCUNi3XLgZMYaAsbOCY1vLAQk_pduMPBW23NXpj 9Un11 iiBdLlbpCgMp8H kYid4eBGybQmOHnif8XoB&typo=1, Paul Latture: platture@a yahoo.com, Bill May: Bmay37@sbcglobal.net, Robbin Rahman: rrahman@barberlawfirm.com, Robert Stebbins: robertbstebbibs@att.net, Diana Thomas: ArkRealEstate@aol.com, Robby Vogel: ravogel@gmail.com. Carney, Dana From: Gary P <glperritt@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:00 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Fwd: PROPOSED ZONING VARIANCE: 17705 CANTRELL RD From: Gary P <glperritt a,mail.com> Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:16 AM Subject: PROPOSED ZONING VARIANCE: 17705 CANTRELL RD To: <dcame littlerock vg_v.gov>, <caberry1955@gmail.com>, <brock lr sbc lobal.net>, <laydbeejay a mail.com>, <sdanhl(c Qmaii.com>, <mhaynes16s.com>, <platture�yahoo.com>, <bmay37@sbcglobal.net>, <rrahman@barberlawfirm.com>, <robertstebbins att.net>, <ArkRea1Estate�?aa.aol.com>, <ravogelail.com> Cc: Lance Hines <lancehines@me.com>, <rriayorscott�3Qa littlerock.gov>, Steven Giles <sgiles@ddh.law>, Bill Sutton <wsutt43@sbcg1obal.net>, Stephanie Freeman <stephanie9405@aol.com>, <h Mesdebbiel 123@aamil.com>, Rogers, Esther <estherrogers@me.com> Dear Mr. Carney, Panning Commission, and related parties: I write this email to formally express my wife's and my own stringent objection to the above variance request and the current manner it has so far been handled. You have received enough emails protesting this variance from the surrounding neighborhood, CHEAUX COURT, so there is no need to be redundant. It's painfully clear where the neighborhood stands. However, the handling and process is another matter in this protest: 1. The neighborhood came together and rented a bus to attend the first meeting in May to show united concern and objection. Literally the night before the meet, it was cancelled by phone and delayed till the next meeting by their attorney, Bill Spivey, in a phone call to the POA President, Bill Sutton. Can he make such a call on behalf of your board especially on such short notice? 2. The POA went with the system and prepared for the next meet in early June. Approx 30+ showed up in the rain and stormy weather along with their attorney, Steve Giles, and prepared to present their objections to the Commission in their allowed 20 minutes, only to be informed the Commission did not have Quorum, with only 8 being present and I think 5 on vacate. Could the Chair not have cleared this to be heard?? These 30+ folks ran ages of 70-85+ years in age and it was a real effort to be there to be so summarily dismissed. In fact, it seemed everyone was appraised ahead of time there would not be a quorum. 3. You have probably have understood by now, this neighborhood is in predominantly a "retirement hood", in which most residents found a quiet setting with assured quiet office environment next door and good protective zoning, as well assurances of the overlay provisions which seem to have been lost in the shuffle somewhere. Though I agree with these objections to the variance at heart, I think there is an even bigger issue which no one seems to address. The entry to this office center is too close to the only entry to this neighborhood and does not need a higher commercial retail increase in traffic.. Besides the addition of a major office building, Bank OZK, there is a huge area growth in the schools resulting in higher concentrations of traffic during school hours. That intersection and light is not capable of handing resulting HWAY 10 traffic and cross traffic left turn by the West Bound lane to the biz center and proposed Tropical Smoothie location in that Center. In fact, this turn -in should never have been allowed so close to this neighborhood red light and only entry/exit. I can only imagine what that will look like as the schools pour out and attempt to get to the Tropical Smoothie across the East bound lane. There will be a huge increase in traffic congestion at this already bothersome intersection and I can only imagine the result of a high volume of younger and older drivers. There's barely a 3 - 4 car lengths between the light and the entry to the biz park. Frankly, the neighborhood has already spent thousands to protect what they had agreed to and expected to happen, to no avail.. They have relied on their city government to protect the zoning and the overlay. Everyone in this neighborhood bought and many "retired" here with an understanding of its surroundings and assurances for the future and they have grown a desirable and model development for the city. Chevaux Court is proud of what they have built in this neighborhood and we welcome for the future such developments as Gleason's Bank OZK. Though large and dynamic, it clearly reflects high standards and respect of the area, the environment, and is a reflects high standards for the city and its image. Chevaux Court understands change and growth for the city and wants to be part of this dynamic in a positive manner, and to this date we feel we have done that and it shows. We consider this request for a change in the immediate next door zoning to be irresponsible and wrong, having a very direct and powerful impact on a standard of living for the entire development and especially for those next to the Biz Development (which historically has not kept up its property and standards well) Probably, this POA won't be able to continue to be stretched out financially trying to protect what they already have; but they are going to muster a good resistance. So far, the allowed process has been an exercise in complete frustration and futility. They expected their city leadership to be part of protecting the already existing agreements. Thank you for your time and consideration, as well your service to the city. Please give this matter your attention and I welcome your response. Best regards, Gary Perritt Chevaux Court resident POA Board 501-951-0388 Cell Gary L. Perritt, Consultant w".garyperritt.com 501-868-7571 direct 501-951-0388 mobile aly erritt(u7 gmaiI.com gaanMerritt.com This e-mail message and any attachments, or prior subsequent transmissions in the same "e-mail chain", contains information from Gary Perritt, Consultant and is to be considered confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or telephone (501-868-7571) and delete this e-mail. Carney, Dana From: Ivy Lincoln <ivy.glen.lincoln@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 1:02 PM To: Carney, Dana; caberry1955@gmail.com; brock_lr@sbcglobal.net; laydbeejay@gmail.com; sdanh1@gmail.com; mhaynes@21cjs.com; platture@yahoo.com; bmay37@sbcglobal.net; rrahman@barberlawfirm.com; robertbstebbins@att.net; ArkRealEstate@aol.com; ravogel@gmail.com Cc: wsutt43@sbcglobal.net Subject: Rezoning Request File No. Z -7605-D Dear Commissioners and Staff: I reside at 5514 Chevaux Court adjoining this rezoning request to the east. I attended the recently -scheduled hearing, but it was re -scheduled until your July 18 meeting. 'Please give consideration to my opposition to the requested variance from the current Office zoning. I live in a patio home subdivision without large yards, a green belt, or any other buffer that might protect us --only your zoning plan ensures our peaceful nights. My wife and I bought our home in reliance on the current zoning. Our area is filling in easily and beautifully with projects that are currently allowed. Please show some economic confidence and stick with your original plan --that's what it will take to keep Little Rock on track. Surely, you won't abandon discipline now when your plan is going so well! Thanks to you all for your work in the public interest. Ivy Lincoln 501-804-1676 Carney, Dana From: Ted Thorsen <thorsen.ted47@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 7:17 AM To: Carney, Dana Subject: Rezoning on Cantrell and Cheneneau 75,000 additional automobiles passing through this area will prove disastrous! Vote NO!! Carney, Dana From: Cherry Landfair <landfair.cl@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 10:14 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: 17705 Cantrell Road I oppose the rezoning of 17705 Cantrell. We live in Bayonne subdivison. Traffic on Cantrell especially at the chenonceau light is terrible. It will only get worse when Bank CZK opens. If this rezoning happens traffic will become even more dangerous. Please do not allow the rezoning. Thank you Cherry Landfair Sent from my iPhone Carney, Dana From: Lee Clark <rhumbadot@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 7:17 PM To: Carney, Dana Subject: zoning variance request adjacent to chevaux court I think it is incumbent on our city planners to consider the impact this change in zoning will have on traffic patterns and volume. A restaurant and physical therapy type facility will add traffic to the area during the entire day, but no doubt peaking around usual meal times. This change (combined with the increased traffic due to the ozk bank relocation) will add that traffic volume with no means of egress controlled by traffic signals. This is untenable. Your support of the existing zoning for the commercial property is desired in order to not complicate traffic on a portion of Cantrell Road that is relatively accident free. Sincerely, Lee Clark 22 Chevaux Circle, 72223 Carney, Dana From: Esther Rogers <rogers.esther@gene.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 5:18 PM To: Carney, Dana; robertbstebbins@att.net Subject: Fwd: Proposed Zoning Variance - 17705 Cantrell Road Attachments: HWY10.1.JPG; HWY10.2.JPG; HWY10.3.JPG; HWY.10.4.JPG; HWY10.5.JPG; HWY10.6.JPG; HWY10.7.JPG; HWY10.MexChiq.JPG; HWY10.ForbiddenGarden.JPG; HWY10.CantFalls.JPG; HWY10.Ranch.JPG; Chenenceau.EmptySpace.JPG I initially had incorrect email addresses for you - so I am forwarding you my original email. Thanks! Esther Esther Rogers Genentech BioOncology Clinical Oncology SpecialistILGI Franchise 501.413.8367 ro,gers.esther@qene.com ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Esther Rogers crogersel @gene.com> Date: Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:11 PM Subject: Proposed Zoning Variance - 17705 Cantrell Road To: <dcarney&littlerockgov.gov>, <caberryl955(cr gmail.com>, cbrock lr@sbeglobal.net>, <lavdbeeja @grnail.com>, <sdanhl @gmail.com>, cmha nes 21c's_com>, <platture@vahoo.com>, chma 37 sbc lobal.net>, <rrahman�7a barberlawfirm.com>, <robertstebbins@@att.net>, <ArkRealEstate@u,aol.Gam>, <ravogel c@g-mail.com> Cc: <wsutt43 asbcglobal.net>, Debbie Hayes <debbiehayes1123@gmail.com>, <gloerritt�ia�gmail.com>, <stephanie9405@aol.com>, csktcobb mail.com> Dear Mr. Carney and current Board Members: I am a resident of Chevaux Court and this email serves as my formal opposition to the proposed zoning variance at 17705 Cantrell Road. By now, I am certain you have heard from many homeowners in Chevaux Court, all of whom are opposed to this rezoning proposition. I have one additional point to make and that is in relation to the Little Rock Planning and Development Department's Mission Statement. The statement reads as follows - "To enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Little Rock by providing a Department which provides quality growth, development and redevelopment and the stabilization of neighborhoods through concentrated effort of planning, land use controls, Historic Preservation, permitting and enforcement." The proposed zoning variance is the antithesis to your Mission Statement. From my doorstep to Kroger on Cantrell Road is 2.1 miles. There are many For Lease signs on that 2 mile route; I have attached pictures of 12 of those lease options for your review. My questions to you: Why allow office space to be rezoned to retail space when it would provide nothing but disruption to an otherwise quiet neighborhood, especially when there are numerous vacancies along the Highway 10 corridor? Please consider the negative consequences this decision would have on the residents of Chevaux Court. Decrease in residential property values, decline in quality of life and destabilization of the neighborhood are among our top concerns. The result of this rezoning proposal is in direct conflict with your mission. I appreciate your consideration. Should you need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Esther Rogers 5425 Chevaux Court Little Rock, AR 72223 Esther Rogers Genentech BioOncology Clinical Oncology SpecialistILGI Franchise 501.413.8367