Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7457 Staff AnalysisAugust 25, 2003 ITEM NO.- 10 File No.: Z-7457 Owner: John and Debbie Boyd Address; 428 Midland Avenue Description; Part of Lots 14 and 15, Block 12, Midland Hills Addition Zoned: R-3 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the easement provisions of Section 36-11 and the area provisions of Section 36-156, associated with a proposed accessory building. Justification: Present Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No issues. B. Staff Analysis: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Single Family Residential Single Family Residential The R-3 zoned property at 428 Midland is occupied by a two-story brick and frame single family residence. There is an existing accessory storage building at the northwest corner of the property. There is an alley right-of- way along the west property line which serves as access. The property slopes downward from back to front (west to east). The applicant proposes to remove the existing storage building and construct a new 24 foot by 30 foot carport/storage building (one-story). The proposed structure will be set back from the rear property line approximately six (6) feet and have side yard setbacks ranging from four August 25, 2003 ITEM NO.: 10 (Cont. (4) feet to eight (8) feet. The structure will cover approximately 52 percent of the required rear yard (rear 25 feet). Additionally, part of the building will be located within a 15 foot wide temporary sewer easement which runs along the rear property line. Section 36-156(a)(2)c. of the City's Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum rear yard coverage of 30 percent for accessory buildings in R-3 zoning. Section 36-11(f) requires that the Board of Adjustment review and approve any proposed building encroachments into easements. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow construction of the accessory carport/storage building. Staff is supportive of the variance requests. Staff views the requests as very minor. The Little Rock Wastewater Utility has submitted a letter stating they have no objection to the proposed construction, as the utility no longer has a need for the easement. The increased rear yard coverage associated with the proposed accessory structure will not be out of character with other properties in this general area. The fact that the applicant is locating the structure six (6) feet from the alley will provide increased maneuvering area for the carport. The proposed structure exceeds all of the minimum ordinance required setbacks. C. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances, subject to a building permit being obtained for the construction. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (AUGUST 25, 2003) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 2