HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7427 Staff AnalysisJune 30, 2003
ITEM NO.: 9
File No.: Z-7427
Owner: SRM Properties, LLC
Address: 326 President Clinton Avenue
Description: Northwest corner of President Clinton
Avenue and Ottenheimer Plaza
Zoned: U
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the sign
provisions of Sections 36-353 and 36-547
to allow installation of projecting signs.
Justification:
Present Use of Property:
Proposed Use of Property:
STAFF REPORT
A. Public Works Issues:
No Comments.
B. Staff Anai sis:
The applicant's justification is presented in
an attached letter.
Mixed Use
Mixed Use
The property at 326 President Clinton Avenue is occupied by a two-story
mixed use building. The proposal is to add a projecting sign at the corner
of the building at Ottenheimer Plaza and President Clinton Avenue for the
"SportsZone", a sports bar to be located in the north end of the building
with access off of Ottenheimer. The projecting sign is larger, placed
higher and at a different angle than permitted. It does have neon on the
sign, which requires a larger thickness for the mechanical working of the
neon. The applicant would also like the sign to be animated. The
sequence of illumination would be as such: "S", "P", "O", "R", "T", "S",
"Zone" and then the white outline of each letter "S", "P", "O", "R", "T", "S",
"Zone". The "Bar & Grill" would be on continuously. The martini glass at
the top would not be illuminated.
June 30, 2003
Item No.: 9 (Cont.
Several variances are needed from the River Market Design Overlay
District and sign sections of the City's Zoning Ordinance for the proposed
projecting sign. The requested variances are as follows:
#1. Section 36-353(e)(1)(b) Height of projecting signs shall not
extend past the sill of the second story windows. The sign
would start below the windowsill of the second story window and
extend above 10'-0".
#2. Section 36-353(e)(1)(e) Projecting signs shall be placed at a
90 -degree angle to building. The request is to place the sign at
45 -degree angle to the corner of the building.
#3. Section 36-353(e)(2)(a) Projecting signs shall have a maximum
of twelve (12) square feet of sign face per side. The proposed
sign will be slightly less than 20 sq. feet in area.
#4. Section 36-353(e)(2)(b) Thickness of projecting signs shall be
limited to five (5) inches. The proposed sign will be 18 inches
thick for the neon mechanisms.
#5. Section 36-353(e)(4)(b) Neon is not permitted on projecting
signs. This sign has neon on both sides of the sign.
#6. Section 36-547(6) Unless otherwise specified by this chapter,
all signs may be illuminated. However, no sign regulated by
this chapter may utilize. The illusion of movement by means
of a preprogrammed repetitious sequential switching action in
which illuminated elements of the sign are turned off or on to
visually simulate the impression of motion characteristic of
chasing, running, blinking, oscillation, twinkling, scintillating,
or expanding and contracting light patterns. This sign would
have a preprogrammed repetitious sequential switching action to
illuminate the letters.
The River Market Design Review Committee met on June 3, 2003 and
reviewed the proposed signage. The DRC voted to approve the variances
as listed above, with the bottom of the projecting sign being located just
above the brick ledge separating the first and second floors.
At the June 3, 2003 DRC meeting, the applicant presented a second
projecting sign to be located along the Ottenheimer Plaza side of the
building. This sign will be less than 12 square feet in area, and extend
2
June 30, 2003
Item No.: 9 (Cont.
approximately five (5) feet out from the building. The applicant is
requesting the following variances for the second projecting sign:
#1. Section 36-353(e)(1)(c) Projecting signs shall extend a
maximum of three (3) feet from the face of the building. The
proposed sign would extend a maximum of five (5) feet from the
building.
#2. Section 36-353(e)(2)(b) Thickness of projecting signs shall be
limited to five (5) inches. The proposed sign will be 18 inches
thick for the neon mechanisms.
#3. Section 36-353(e)(4)(b) Neon is not permitted on projecting
signs. This sign has neon on both sides of the sign.
#4. Section 36-547(6) Unless otherwise specified by this chapter,
all signs may be illuminated. However, no sign regulated by
this chapter may utilize. The illusion of movement by means
of a preprogrammed repetitious sequential switching action in
which illuminated elements of the sign are turned off or on to
visually simulate the impression of motion characteristic of
chasing, running, blinking, oscillation, twinkling, scintillating,
or expanding and contracting light patterns. This sign would
have a preprogrammed repetitious sequential switching action to
illuminate the letters.
The River Market DRC also voted to approve these variances on June 3,
2003.
Staff supports all of the requesting variances with the exception of the
variance from Section 36-547(6) for both signs. This particular section of
the ordinance was established for public safety reasons, in an attempt to
prohibit signs which could distract drivers of motor vehicles. Staff feels
that the type of illuminated motion as proposed with the two projecting
signs could create such distractions. Therefore, staff cannot support the
requested variances from Section 36-547.
C. Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends denial of the sign variances, as requested.
9
June 30, 2003
Item No.: 9 (Cont.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 30, 2003)
Ronnie Wells was present, representing the application. There were no
objectors present. Staff presented the application and noted that the applicant
had amended the lighting plan for the two (2) projecting signs as noted in a letter
dated June 27, 2003, and revised the application accordingly. Staff
recommended approval of the revised application, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The lighting of the signs is to be as revised by the applicant, as noted in the
applicant's letter dated June 27, 2003.
2. The variances are approved for "Sports Zone" only. When this business
vacates the building, the signs must be removed.
3. Sign permits must be obtained for the signs.
4. A franchise permit must be obtained for the signs.
Ronnie Wells addressed the Board in support of the application. He described
other signs in Little Rock which had similar lighting as he was proposing.
Fred Gray expressed concern with the proposed sign lighting. He explained that
animated -type signs might not be appropriate in the River Market District.
Chairman Ruck expressed concern with the type of sign lighting proposed.
The issue related to sign lighting was discussed.
Andrew Francis noted that past actions of the Board of Adjustment set no
precedence for other variance cases. He noted that no hardship existed
regarded the proposed sign lighting. This issue was briefly discussed.
There was a motion to approve the revised application as recommended by staff.
There was a brief discussion of the motion. Staff suggested having two (2)
separate motions, one (1) on the proposed variances from Section 36-353 and
one (1) on the variances from Section 36-547. Mr. Wells amended the
application to remove the variances from 36-547, noting that the signs would be
continually lighted. Therefore, the motion was to approve the variances from
Section 36-353 as recommended by staff. The motion passed by a vote of 4
ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent.
4
AGENDA
RIVER MARKET DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
June 3, 2003 8:30 AM
2"d Floor Conference Room, River Market
I. Roll Call —finding of quorum
Presentation of Items:
1.
Minutes
2.
SportsZone
3.
Ordinance revisions
4.
Sign ordinance
June 3, 2003
ITEM NO.: 2
Name: SportsZone
Location: 326 East Clinton Ave.
Reouest: projecting sign and associated variances
Source: Ronnie Wells, Custom Sign and Neon
PROPOSAL I REQUEST -
The proposal is to add a projecting sign at the corner of
the building at Ottenheimer Plaza and President Clinton 2'
Avenue for the "SportsZone", a sports bar to be located
in the north end of the building with access off of
Ottenheimer. The projecting sign is larger, placed
higher and at a different angle than permitted. It does
have neon on the sign, which requires a larger thickness'
for the mechanical working of the neon. The applicant
would also like the sign to be animated. The sequence
of illumination would be as such. "S", "P", "0", "R11, "T",
"S", "Zone" and then the white outline of each letter "S",
"P", "O", "R", "T", "S", "Zone". The "Bar & Grill" would be
on continuously. The martini glass at the top would not
be illuminated.
This application is for the projecting sign only. All other
signage will come before the DRC at a later date.
HIM
L'J
Variances needed:
L!r!posed sign
#1. Sec 36-353 (e)(1)(b) Height of projecting signs
shall not extend past the sill of the second story
windows. The sign would start below the
windowsill of the second story window and extend above 10'-0".
#2. Sec 36-353 (e)(1)(e) Projecting signs shall be placed at 90 -degree angle to building.
The request is to place the sign at 45 -degree angle to the corner of the building.
#3. Sec 36-353 (e)(2)(a) Projecting signs shall have a maximum of twelve (12) square feet
of sign face per side. The proposed sign will be slightly less than 20 sq feet in area.
#4. Sec 3.6-353 (e)(2)(b) Thickness of projecting signs shall be limited to five (5) inches. The
proposed sign will be 18 inches thick for the neon mechanisms.
#5. Sec 36-353 (e)(4)(b) Neon is not permitted on projecting signs. This sign has neon on
both sides of the sign.
#6 Sec 36-547 (6) Unless otherwise specified by this chapter, all signs may be illuminated.
However, no sign regulated by this chapter may utilize: The illusion of movement by
means of a preprogrammed repetitious sequential switching action in which illuminated
elements of the sign are turned off or on to visually simulate the impression of motion
characteristic of chasing, running, blinking, oscillation, twinkling, scintillating, or
expanding and contracting light patterns. This sign would have a preprogrammed
repetitious sequential switching action to illuminate the letters.
�6F
{A-�
Proposed Projecting Sign
Exterior of building showing proposed signage.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the variances for the following items: angle to building (#2), thickness of sign
(#4) and permitting neon on sign (#5).
Staff does not support the variance for location (#1) nor does it support the size variance (#3)
nor the variance for animation (#6). Staff recommends that the sign be reduced to 12 square
feet in size and mounted with a nine (9) feet clearance off of the sidewalk. If the top of the sign
exceeds the height of the second floor windowsill with this location, Staff would support it.
June 3, 2003
ITEM NO 3
Name: Ordinance Review
Source: Brian Minyard, Staff
The Plans Committee, a sub committee of the Planning Commission, has reviewed the
proposed changes to the ordinance. There were no changes to the text as submitted.
The ordinance package will go to the August 7, 2003 Planning Commission and then to the
Board of Directors in mid September. If we have resolution on the newspaper boxes by that
time, we will include it in the package. If not, we will take it to the Planning Commission/Board
of Directors at a later date.
Staff would request that at least one of the members be at the Planning Commission and the
Board of Directors meeting to answer questions. Staff will make any presentation to the
commission, but the Commissioners do ask questions that might be best answered by a DRC
member.
June 3, 2003
ITEM NO.: 4
Name: Sign Ordinance
Source: Brian Minyard, Staff
This item is in response to the request by Greg Hart and Millie Ward to discuss the current
interpretation of the ordinance concerning signs that are hung on the interior of buildings that
are intended to be viewed from the exterior only.
According to Dana Carney, Zoning and Subdivision Manager, any signage that is displayed in
the interior of a building that can only be seen from the exterior of the building does in fact
constitute a sign. Any design that was applied to the exterior of the window blinds, or on any
other surface (wood, metal, plastic, etc.) that had advertising copy, name of business, etc.
would constitute a sign. That sign would have to conform to the River Market Overlay and
would have to appear before the DRC committee.
A business can place artwork in the windows that can only be seen from the exterior of the
building. However, that artwork cannot contain any business name, or any other copy that
would constitute a sign.