Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7369-A Staff AnalysisAPRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 5 File No.: Owner: Applicant: Address: Description Zoned: Z -7369-A Claire M. Bilheimer Stephen Bilheimer North end of Belle Meadow Lane Lot 14A, Plantation Acres, Phase II R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the building line provisions of Section 31-12 to allow a new house which crosses a front platted building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Undeveloped Proposed Use of Property: STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: Single Family Residential The R-2 zoned property at the north end of Belle Meadow Lane (Lot 14A, Plantation Acres Phase II Subdivision) is undeveloped and mostly wooded. Some site work has been done in preparation of new home construction. The property slopes upward to the north from Belle Meadow Lane and downward to the west. There is a drainage ditch which runs north/south through the lot, approximately 160 feet back from the front property line. The applicant proposes to construct an approximate 8,800 square foot (one story) single family residence on the lot, as shown on the attached site plan. The lot has a 100 foot platted front building line. The building line is actually located approximately 120 feet from the lot's east property line. APRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 5 CONT. The single family residential structure is proposed to be located almost entirely outside the platted building line, between the platted building line and the east property line. Section 31-12 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance requires that all encroachments across platted building lines be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. The proposed house is located 50 feet back from the east (front) property line and approximately 35 feet back from the southeast portion of the front property line along the cul-de-sac. The minimum required front yard setback, as typically required by the City's Zoning Ordinance, is 25 feet. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff feels that the variance is reasonable given the uneven topography of the lot and the location of the rather wide drainage ditch. The placement of structure as shown on the proposed site plan should prove not to be out of character with the other homes along Belle Meadow Lane, given the fact that the lot is located at the end of the cul-de-sac. The applicant will need to submit a letter from the Plantation Acres Architectural Control Committee approving the proposed construction. On March 31, 2003, The Board of Adjustment approved a similar front building line encroachment for a single family residence which was never constructed on this lot. Staff feels that the proposed home construction will have no adverse impact on the general area. If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the front building line for the proposed single family residence. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. The adjusted (replatted) front building line should follow the outline of the proposed single family residence and not extend outside the building's footprint. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested building line variance, subject to the following conditions: 1. Completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted building line as approved by the Board. 2. A letter from the Plantation Acres Architectural Control Committee approving the proposed construction must be submitted to staff, prior to the staff approving the replat. 2 APRIL 25, 2005 ITEM NO.: 5 CONT. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 25, 2005) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 5 ayes and 0 nays. 3