Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7255 Staff AnalysisJuly 29, 2002 ITEM NO.: 11 File No.: Z-7255 Owner: Sam Alley Address: 54 Chenal Circle Description: Lot 10R, Chenal Valley Addition Zoned: R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow a building addition with a reduced rear yard setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 54 Chenal Circle is occupied by a two-story stucco single family residence. There is a circular drive which serves as access to the property from Chenal Circle. The property backs up to the Chenal Golf Course. The applicant proposes to construct a 1,100 square foot building addition (one-story) at the southeast corner of the residential structure. The proposed addition will be located 22 feet to 24.5 feet from the rear (south) property line. Section 36-254(d)(3) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow the building addition with a reduced rear yard setback. July 29, 2002 Item No.: 11 Staff supports the requested variance. The variance is very minor in nature, with the addition encroaching only 0.5 to 3 feet into the required rear yard. Additionally, the rear property line of this lot is not parallel to the front property line. If it were parallel running from the southwest corner of the property eastward, no variance would be needed. Staff feels that the requested variance will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variance for a reduced rear yard setback, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JULY 29, 2002) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 2