HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7096 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-7096
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
James T. Berry
White-Daters and Associates
East side of Chenal Parkway,
approximately 570 feet south of
Cantrell Road
Rezone from R-2 to C-3
Future commercial development
5 acres
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North
- Undeveloped;
zoned
C-3
South
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
East
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
West
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
A. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
1. Show legal access to the property.
With Building Permit:
2. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.
3. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master
Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements
to this street including 5 -foot sidewalk with planned
development.
4. Grading permit will be required on this development.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.)
B. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT:
The site is not located on a CATA Bus Route.
C. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site
as well as the Aberdeen Court, Bayonne Place and DuQuesne
Place Neighborhood Associations were notified of the
proposed rezoning. There were no residents within 300 feet
of the site to notify.
D. LAND USE ELEMENT:
This request is located in the Chenal Planning District.
The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this area. The
applicant has applied for C-3 zoning. A Land Use Plan
Amendment has been filed and is a separate item on this
agenda.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in an area not covered by a
city recognized neighborhood action plan.
E. STAFF ANALYSIS:
The request before the Commission is to rezone this
undeveloped, wooded, 5 -acre tract from R-2 Single Family
Residential District to C-3 General Commercial District.
No immediate development has been proposed for the site.
This rezoning request is associated with a Land Use Plan
Amendment, LU01-19-06 (Item 3. on this agenda).
The 5 acre tract, which appears to be land -locked, is
located along the east side of Chenal Parkway,
approximately 570 feet south of Cantrell Road. Staff is
not sure how the applicant is to gain legal access to the
property, as there is another R-2 zoned piece of property
between this tract and Chenal Parkway.
There is a large amount of undeveloped commercial zoned
property in this immediate area of the intersection of
Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Road. There are approximately
18.5 acres of undeveloped C-3 zoned property immediately
north of this site along the south side of Cantrell Road
(southeast corner of Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway).
V,
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.
There is also approximately 26.5 acres of undeveloped C-3
zoned property across Chenal Parkway to the west, at the
southwest corner of Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Road.
There is approximately 4 acres of undeveloped C-2 zoned
property at the southwest corner of Chenal Parkway and
Northfield Drive. Additionally, there is somewhere in the
vicinity of 16 acres of undeveloped C -2/C-3 zoned property
within the Northwest Territory Subdivision located on the
north side of Cantrell Road at Chenal Parkway.
There is a strip of undeveloped R-2 zoned property
immediately west of this site, between this property and
Chenal Parkway. There is a large amount of undeveloped R-2
zoned property immediately south and east of this site.
The Aberdeen Court single family neighborhood is located --'to
the southeast, with the DuQuesne Place single family
neighborhood being located to the southwest across Chenal
Parkway.
Staff is not supportive of the requested C-3 zoning for
this location. The Chenal District Land Use Plan
recommends Single Family for this site and the larger areas
to the south and east. As noted previously, there is a
large amount of available, undeveloped commercial zoned (C-
2 and C-3) land at each of the corners of the intersection
of Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway, two (2) principal
arterials. Staff does not believe this rezoning is
appropriate given the availability of undeveloped,
commercial zoned property in the area.
Additionally, staff is not in favor of moving the south
line of the C-3 zoned property along the south side of
Cantrell Road (southeast corner of Cantrell Road and Chenal
Parkway) further to the south into an area which could
possible be used as a transitional area in the future.
This property is located between the C-3 zoned property to
the north and single family neighborhoods to the southeast
and southwest. Staff feels that if this property is not
developed as single family in the future, it could possibly
prove to be an appropriate area of transition (multifamily
or quiet office) between the commercial zoning along
Cantrell Road and the single family neighborhoods to the
south.
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the requested C-3 zoning.
3
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 18, 2001)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application. There
were two (2) persons present in opposition. Staff briefly
described the proposed rezoning, with a recommendation of
denial. Staff also presented the proposed Land Use Plan
Amendment, with a recommendation of denial. Staff noted that
the applicant had requested deferral of this item to the
November 29, 2001 agenda.
The Chairman removed this item from the Consent Agenda for
deferral, so that one (1) of the persons present in opposition
could address the Commission.
Mary Dornhoffer addressed the Commission in opposition to the,
proposed rezoning. She stated the following points as specific
reasons for the opposition:
1. The rezoning would significantly impact the traffic flow in
the area.
2. There was a large amount of vacant commercial property in
the area.
3. The increase in commercial zoning would be detrimental to
the scenic corridor.
4. The rezoning would negatively impact the property values in
the area.
There was a motion to defer the application to the November 29,
2001 agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 1 nay and
2 absent.
STAFF UPDATE:
The applicant submitted a revised application to staff on
October 29, 2001. The revised application adds 30.76 acres of
property for rezoning to the original five (5) acre rezoning
request. The revised application includes all of the
undeveloped R-2 zoned property south of the existing C-3 zoning
to Chenal Parkway, for a total of 35.76 acres.
The applicant is now requesting to rezone a 10.92 acre strip
along the south line of the existing C-3 zoned property from R-2
to C-3. The applicant is also requesting to rezone 10.58 acres
to the south from R-2 to 0-2 (Office and Institutional
District), and 14.26 acres from R-2 to OS (Open Space District).
There is a 250 foot wide AP&L easement which runs along the east
boundary of the overall acreage. Therefore, 1.89 acres of the
requested C-3 zoning and 6 acres of the requested OS zoning are
located within the utility easement. There is also a 100 foot
4
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.)
wide utility easement which runs north/south through the center
of this overall property. This easement will serve as
additional buffer area along the east side of the proposed 0-2
zoning.
Staff is supportive of the revised application. Staff was not
in favor of the rezoning of five (5) acres of the property to C-
3, moving the C-3 zoning line further south adjacent to
undeveloped R-2 zoned property. This was due primarily to the
fact that staff had concerns about the transition from the C-3
zoned property to the single family neighborhoods to the
southeast and southwest (across Chenal Parkway). Staff feels
that the applicant has addressed the transition issue with the
revised application, proposing 10.58 acres of 0-2 zoning and
14.26 acres of OS zoning south of the proposed C-3.
The proposed 14.26 acres of OS zoning will provide a very nice
buffer for the Aberdeen Court Neighborhood from the proposed 0-2
and C-3 zones. The proposed OS area will allow for the existing
hilltop and forested area to be preserved. The highest point of
the hill is located between 70 and 90 feet above the existing
grades along the east property line of the proposed OS area.
In addition, the proposed 10.58 acres of 0-2 zoning will allow
adequate transition from the C-3 zoned property to Chenal
Parkway, for the single family lots located to the southwest, in
close proximity to the Parkway. It should be noted that the 0-2
zoning district is a site plan review district, and has greater
minimum setback requirements and a larger required lot size than
do the other office districts. Therefore, the Planning
Commission will have control over the development of this
transition area. Following are excerpts from the City of Little
Rock Zoning Ordinance which address the purpose and intent of
the 0-2 zoning district:
"To provide appropriate locations for well-designed
office facilities on large tracts, generally not
available in the built-up areas of the city, and to
provide for unified orderly development of major
cultural, educational, medical, governmental and
religious facilities."
"In order to support and enhance their benefit to
the community, height and area, standards are
designed to assure the harmonious integration of
such development with surrounding neighborhoods."
"The 0-2 district may be applied to either existing
developed areas to facilitate expansion of existing
office and institutional uses or to undeveloped
locations where such uses are also appropriate."
5
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.)
"Low intensity of land usage and a park -like setting
are primary characteristics of this district. Where
office buildings higher than forty-five (45) feet
are anticipated, greater setbacks are required in
order to provide light and air to adjacent
properties."
Staff believes that the C-3, 0-2 and OS rezoning requests are
compatible with uses and zoning in the area, and will have no
adverse impact on the adjacent properties. Staff is willing to
forgo the issue related to the amount of available, undeveloped
commercial zoned property in this general area, based on the
fact that the applicant has proposed an overall zoning plan for
this entire 35.76 acre property, which includes all of the
undeveloped property between the C-3 zoned property along
Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway. The applicant also revised
the Land Use Plan Amendment application (Item A on this agenda)
to include this property. Staff also supports the revised Land
Use Plan Amendment, as the proposed rezonings conform to the
proposed amendments.
Revised Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the C-3, 0-2 and OS zoning
requests, as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(NOVEMBER 29, 2001)
Tim Daters and Jack McCray were present, representing the
application. There was one (1) person present in opposition.
Staff explained the revised rezoning application with a
recommendation of approval. This application was discussed
simultaneously with Item A (LU01-19-06).
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application.
Tom Draper, president of the Duquesne Place Property Owner's
Association, addressed the Commission in opposition. Mr. Draper
expressed concern with traffic in this general area. He noted
that egress and ingress was difficult to his subdivision. He
noted that Deltic Timber Corporation was in the process of
platting a large number of single family lots west of the
Duquesne Subdivision, which would compound the traffic problem.
He mentioned the traffic count along this section of Chenal
Parkway. He also noted that the rezonings would generate
additional traffic in this area. He stated that the proposed
FILE NO.: Z-7096 (Cont.
rezonings would have an adverse impact on the single family
property values in this area.
Commissioner Berry asked if the Duquesne Subdivision had only
one (1) way in and out. Staff noted that Northfield
Road/Chalamont Drive had been constructed and extended to
Cantrell Road, giving the subdivision two (2) points of access.
Mr. Daters also noted that there was an emergency access platted
to the Duquesne Subdivision.
Commissioner Rector asked when the additional improvements to
this area of Chenal Parkway would be made and who would be
responsible for the improvements. Bob Turner, Director of
Public Works, noted that when the traffic count got to 12,000
vehicles per day, the required additional improvements to Chenal
Parkway would have to be made. He noted that Deltic Timber
Corporation would be responsible for the improvements.
Commissioner Floyd asked about access to the new single family
subdivision west of the Duquesne Subdivision. Mr. Daters noted
that Chalamont Drive was a collector street which extended from
Chenal Parkway to Cantrell Road, giving the subdivision two (2)
points of access. This issue was briefly discussed.
Commissioner Floyd asked if the property owners had a user or
buyer for the property. Jack McCray, of Deltic Timber
Corporation, noted that there was no planned use for the
property at this time.
There was a motion to approve the Land Use Plan Amendment LU01-
19-06. The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes, 3 nays and
1 absent. The application was approved.
Mr. Draper made additional comments regarding traffic in the
area of the Duquesne Subdivision and access to this subdivision.
There was a second motion to approve the C-3, 0-2 and OS
rezonings, as filed. The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes,
3 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved.
F
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
FILE NO.: Z-7096
James T. Berry
White-Daters and Associates
East side of Chenal Parkway,
approximately 570 feet south of
Cantrell Road
Rezone from R-2 to C-3
Future commercial development
5 acres
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North
- Undeveloped;
zoned
C-3
South
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
East
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
West
- Undeveloped;
zoned
R-2
A. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS:
1. Show legal access to the property.
With Building Permit:
2. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance
18,031.
3. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master
Street Plan). Construct one-half street improvements to
this street including 5 -foot sidewalk with planned
development.
4. Grading permit will be required on this development.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
B.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT:
The site is not located on a CATA Bus Route.
C. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:
FILE NO.: Z-7096
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site
as well as the Aberdeen Court, Bayonne Place and DuQuesne
Place Neighborhood Associations were notified of the
proposed rezoning. There were no residents within 300 feet
of the site to notify.
D. LAND USE ELEMENT:
This request is located in the Chenal Planning District.
The Land Use Plan shows Single Family for this area. The
applicant has applied for C-3 zoning. A Land Use Plan
Amendment has been filed and is a separate item on this
agenda.
city Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in an area not covered by a
city recognized neighborhood action plan.
E. STAFF ANALYSIS:
The request before the Commission is to rezone this
undeveloped, wooded, 5 -acre tract from R-2 Single Family
Residential District to C-3 General Commercial District. No
immediate development has been proposed for the site. This
rezoning request is associated with a Land Use Plan
Amendment, LU01-19-06 (Item 3. on this agenda).
The 5 acre tract, which appears to be land -locked, is
located along the east side of Chenal Parkway, approximately
570 feet south of Cantrell Road. Staff is not sure how the
applicant is to gain legal access to the property, as there
is another R-2 zoned piece of property between this tract
and Chenal Parkway.
There is a large amount of undeveloped commercial zoned
property in this immediate area of the intersection of
Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Road. There are approximately
18.5 acres of undeveloped C-3 zoned property immediately
2
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-7096
north of this site along the south side of Cantrell Road-
(southeast
oad(southeast corner of Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway).
There is also approximately 26.5 acres of undeveloped C-3
zoned property across Chenal Parkway to the west, at the
southwest corner of Chenal Parkway and Cantrell Road. There
is approximately 4 acres of undeveloped C-2 zoned property
at the southwest corner of Chenal Parkway and Northfield
Drive. Additionally, there is somewhere in the vicinity of
16 acres of undeveloped C -2/C-3 zoned property within the
Northwest Territory Subdivision located on the north side of
Cantrell Road at Chenal Parkway.
There is a strip of undeveloped R-2 zoned property
immediately west of this site, between this property and
Chenal Parkway. There is a large amount of undeveloped R-2
zoned property immediately south and east of this site. The
Aberdeen Court single family neighborhood is located to the
southeast, with the DuQuesne Place single family
neighborhood being located to the southwest across Chenal
Parkway.
Staff is not supportive of the requested C-3 zoning for this
location. The Chenal District Land Use Plan recommends
Single Family for this site and the larger areas to the
south and east. As noted previously, there is a large
amount of available, undeveloped commercial zoned (C-2 and
C-3) land at each of the corners of the intersection of
Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway, two (2) principal
arterials. Staff does not believe this rezoning is
appropriate given the availability of undeveloped,
commercial zoned property in the area.
Additionally, staff is not in favor of moving the south line
of the C-3 zoned property along the south side of Cantrell
Road (southeast corner of Cantrell Road and Chenal Parkway)
further to the south into an area which could possible be
used as a transitional area in the future. This property is
located between the C-3 zoned property to the north and
single family neighborhoods to the southeast and southwest.
Staff feels that if this property is not developed as single
family in the future, it could possibly prove to be an
appropriate area of transition (multifamily or quiet office)
between the commercial zoning along Cantrell Road and the
single family neighborhoods to the south.
3
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
F. STAFF RECOMNENDATION:
FILE NO.: Z-7096
Staff recommends denial of the requested C-3 zoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 18, 2001)
Tim Daters was present, representing the application. There were
two (2) persons present in opposition. Staff briefly described
the proposed rezoning, with a recommendation of denial. Staff
also presented the proposed Land Use Plan Amendment, with a
recommendation of denial. Staff noted that the applicant had,
requested deferral of this item to the November 29, 2001 agenda.
The Chairman removed this item from the Consent Agenda for
deferral, so that one (1) of the persons present in opposition
could address the Commission.
Mary Dornhoffer addressed the Commission in opposition to the
proposed rezoning. She stated the following points as specific
reasons for the opposition:
1. The rezoning would significantly impact the traffic flow in
the area.
2. There was a large amount of vacant commercial property in the
area.
3. The increase in commercial zoning would be detrimental to the
scenic corridor.
4. The rezoning would negatively impact the property values in
the area.
There was a motion to defer the application to the November 29,
2001 agenda. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 1 nay and
2 absent.
STAFF UPDATE:
The applicant submitted a revised application to staff on
October 29, 2001. The revised application adds 30.76 acres of
property for rezoning to the original five (5) acre rezoning
request. The revised application includes all of the undeveloped
R-2 zoned property south of the existing C-3 zoning to Chenal
Parkway, for a total of 35.76 acres.
The applicant is now requesting to rezone a 10.92 acre strip
along the south line of the existing C-3 zoned property from R-2
4
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-7096
to C-3. The applicant is also requesting to rezone 10.58 acres
to the south from R-2 to 0-2 (Office and Institutional District),
and 14.26 acres from R-2 to OS (Open Space District). There is a
250 foot wide AP&L easement which runs along the east boundary of
the overall acreage. Therefore, 1.89 acres of the requested C-3
zoning and 6 acres of the requested OS zoning are located within
the utility easement. There is also a 100 foot wide utility
easement which runs north/south through the center of this
overall property. This easement will serve as additional buffer
area along the east side of the proposed 0-2 zoning.
Staff is supportive of the revised application. Staff was not in
favor of the rezoning of five (5) acres of the property to C-3,
moving the C-3 zoning line further south adjacent to undeveloped
R-2 zoned property. This was due primarily to the fact that
staff had concerns about the transition from the C-3 zoned
property to the single family neighborhoods to the southeast and
southwest (across Chenal Parkway). Staff feels that the
applicant has addressed the transition issue with the revised
application, proposing 10.58 acres of 0-2 zoning and 14.26 acres
of OS zoning south of the proposed C-3.
The proposed 14.26 acres of OS zoning will provide a very nice
buffer for the Aberdeen Court Neighborhood from the proposed 0-2
and C-3 zones. The proposed OS area will allow for the existing
hilltop and forested area to be preserved. The highest point of
the hill is located between 70 and 90 feet above the existing
grades along the east property line of the proposed OS area.
In addition, the proposed 10.58 acres of 0-2 zoning will allow
adequate transition from the C-3 zoned property to Chenal
Parkway, for the single family lots located to the southwest, in
close proximity to the Parkway. It should be noted that the 0-2
zoning district is a site plan review district, and has greater
minimum setback requirements and a larger required lot size than
do the other office districts. Therefore, the Planning
Commission will have control over the development of this
transition area. Following are excerpts from the City of Little
Rock Zoning Ordinance which address the purpose and intent of the
0-2 zoning district:
"To provide appropriate locations for well-designed
office facilities on large tracts, generally not
available in the built-up areas of the city, and to
provide for unified orderly development of major
cultural, educational, medical, governmental and
religious facilities."
5
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.)
FILE NO.: Z-7096
"In order to support and enhance their benefit to
the community, height and area, standards are
designed to assure the harmonious integration of
such development with surrounding neighborhoods."
"The 0-2 district may be applied to either existing
developed areas to facilitate expansion of existing
office and institutional uses or to undeveloped
locations where such uses are also appropriate."
"Low intensity of land usage and a park -like setting
are primary characteristics of this district. Where
office buildings higher than forty-five (45) feet
are anticipated, greater setbacks are required in
order to provide light and air to adjacent
properties."
Staff believes that the C-3, 0-2 and OS rezoning requests are
compatible with uses and zoning in the area, and will have no
adverse impact on the adjacent properties. Staff is willing to
forgo the issue related to the amount of available, undeveloped
commercial zoned property in this general area, based on the fact
that the applicant has proposed an overall zoning plan for this
entire 35.76 acre property, which includes all of the undeveloped
property between the C-3 zoned property along Cantrell Road and
Chenal Parkway. The applicant also revised the Land Use Plan
Amendment application (Item A on this agenda) to include this
property. Staff also supports the revised Land Use Plan
Amendment, as the proposed rezonings conform to the proposed
amendments.
Revised Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the C-3, 0-2 and OS zoning requests,
as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 29, 2001)
Tim Daters and Jack McCray were present, representing the
application. There was one (1) person present in opposition.
Staff explained the revised rezoning application with a
recommendation of approval. This application was discussed
simultaneously with Item A (LU01-19-06).
6
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-7096
Tim Daters addressed the Commission in support of the
application.
Tom Draper, president of the Duquesne Place Property Owner's
Association, addressed the Commission in opposition. Mr. Draper
expressed concern with traffic in this general area. He noted
that egress and ingress was difficult to his subdivision. He
noted that Deltic Timber Corporation was in the process of
platting a large number of single family lots west of the
Duquesne Subdivision, which would compound the traffic problem.
He mentioned the traffic count along this section of Chenal
Parkway. He also noted that the rezonings would generate
additional traffic in this area. He stated that the proposed
rezonings would have an adverse impact on the single family
property values in this area.
Commissioner Berry asked if the Duquesne Subdivision had only one
(1) way in and out. Staff noted that Northfield Road/Chalamont
Drive had been constructed and extended to Cantrell Road, giving
the subdivision two (2) points of access. Mr. Daters also noted
that there was an emergency access platted to the Duquesne
Subdivision.
Commissioner Rector asked when the additional improvements to
this area of Chenal Parkway would be made and who would be
responsible for the improvements. Bob Turner, Director of Public
Works, noted that when the traffic count got to 12,000 vehicles
per day, the required additional improvements to Chenal Parkway
would have to be made. He noted that Deltic Timber Corporation
would be responsible for the improvements.
Commissioner Floyd asked about access to the new single family
subdivision west of the Duquesne Subdivision. Mr. Daters noted
that Chalamont Drive was a collector street which extended from
Chenal Parkway to Cantrell Road, giving the subdivision two (2)
points of access. This issue was briefly discussed.
Commissioner Floyd asked if the property owners had a user or
buyer for the property. Jack McCray, of Deltic Timber
Corporation, noted that there was no planned use for the property
at this time.
There was a motion to approve the Land Use Plan Amendment LU01-
19-06. The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes, 3 nays and
1 absent. The application was approved.
hl
November 29, 2001
ITEM NO.: B (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-7096
Mr. Draper made additional comments regarding traffic in the area
of the Duquesne Subdivision and access to this subdivision.
There was a second motion to approve the C-3, 0-2 and OS
rezonings, as filed. The motion passed by a vote of 7 ayes,
3 nays and 1 absent. The application was approved.
8