HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-7091 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-7091
NAME: Presbyterian Village — Long Form PRD Revocation
LOCATION: 810 Brookside Drive
DEVELOPER:
Presbyterian Village, Inc.
500 Brookside Drive
Little Rock, AR 72205
OWNER/AUTHORIZED AGENT:
Presbyterian Village — Owner
Joe White and Associates — Agent
SURVEYOR/ENGINEER:
Joe White and Associates
25 Rahling Circle, Suite A-2
Little Rock, AR 72223
AREA: 11.67 acres
WARD: 4
CURRENT ZONING
Variance/Waivers:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
PLANNING DISTRICT: 3
--E
None requested.
BACKGROUND/REQUEST:
FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
CENSUS TRACT: 22.03
On October 4, 2001 the Planning Commission approved a rezoning of this 11.67 acre
property from R-2 and 0-3 to "PRD" Planned Residential District. The PRD zoning was
approved by the Board of Directors on November 20, 2001 (Ordinance No. 18,593). The
PRD was approved to allow an independent living apartment facility including a 210,000
square foot four (4) story building with 190 parking spaces. The building was to contain 126
apartment units. The plan also included 15 independent living villas along the east portion of
the overall property. This PRD project was never developed.
FILE NO.: Z-7091 (Cont.)
The property owner does not wish to pursue the previously approved PRD development, and
is requesting that the PRD zoning be revoked and the property be restored to its original
R-2 and 0-3 zoning.
Approximately 10 acres of the property was previously zoned R-2 and approximately
1.67 acres was zoned 0-3 (south portion). The applicant is proposing a single family
residential preliminary plat for the property, which is a separate item on this agenda.
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site and all neighborhood associations
registered with the City of Little Rock were notified of the public hearing.
Staff is supportive of the requested PRD revocation. Staff views the request as reasonable.
The property is in an area containing a mixture of uses and zoning, with multifamily
developments to the north and west, office and multifamily zoned property to the south, and
a single family subdivision across Grassy Flat Creek to the east. Staff believes the proposed
PRD revocation and restoration of the property to its original R-2 and 0-3 zoning will have no
adverse impact on the general area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the PRD revocation request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEPTEMBER 9, 2021)
The applicant was present. There were no persons present registered in support or
opposition. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval as outlined in the
"staff recommendation" above. There was no further discussion. The item was placed on
the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff, including all staff comments
and conditions. The vote was 9 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent and 1 open position.
2
October 4, 2001
ITEM NO.: 6
FILE NO.: Z-7091
NAME: Presbyterian Village - long -Form PRD
LOCATION: 510 Brookside Drive
n1WcrW.7.npF.R
Presbyterian Village, Inc.
510 Brookside Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72205
AREA: 18.472 acres
ZONING:
Existing: 0-3 and R-2
Proposed: PRD
ENGINEER:
Development Consultants, Inc.
2200 N. Rodney Parham, Ste. 220
Little Rock, AR 72212 .,
NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ALLOWED USES: Office and Single Family
PROPOSED USE: Nursing home and elderly housing
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
BACKGROUND:
Presbyterian Village retirement community is located on an 0-3
zoned, 8.09± acre tract at 510 Brookside Drive. The facility
consists of several buildings containing a variety of housing
types for the elderly. Building heights range from 1 to 3
stories. The facility currently has 105 nursing care beds and
104 independent living apartment units. The existing
development is located on the west side of Brookside Drive. The
Brookside Drive right-of-way ends at Presbyterian Village's
north perimeter.
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.)
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
Presbyterian Village proposes
expansion of its facilities.
two components; a north site
FILE NO.: Z-7091
a major redevelopment and
The development plan is in
and a south site.
The south site is the current, 8.09± acre, 0-3 zoned
Presbyterian Village development. The facility consists of
multiple buildings containing 105 nursing care beds and 104
independent living apartment units. The site will be razed
other than for 37 independent living apartments. A new,
three-story, 95,000 square foot health care building and
111 space parking lot will be built on the site. The
healthcare building will contain 111 beds.
The north site is an undeveloped 0-3 and R-2 zoned, 10.36±
acre tract north of the current terminus of Brookside
Drive. This site will be accessed via a driveway/access
easement extending north from Brookside. Fifteen
independent living villas will be constructed along the
east side of the driveway. These are comprised of a series
of duplex and single family dwellings, with garages. This
north site will also contain a 210,000 square foot
independent living apartment building. The building will
vary in height from 3 to 4 stories and will contain 56, one
bedroom units and 70, two bedroom units. 190 parking
spaces are proposed in one lot north of the building, along
a circular driveway in front of the building and off of the
main driveway across from the Villas.
The north site is surrounded by a series of platted but
undeveloped street rights-of-way. The applicant will
proceed to the Board of Directors to abandon these rights-
of-way as an "adversarial abandonment" due to difficulties
in locating and receiving approval from all abutting
property owners.
A terraced cut will be made in the western portion of the
north site. This 50± foot cut exceeds the Ordinance
allowable maximum of 30 feet without Planning Commission
approval. The applicant has submitted schematic grading
and drainage plans and a cross-section showing the
appropriate terracing of the cut slope. An undisturbed
area, varying in width from 25 feet to 160± feet, will
remain along the western perimeter of the north site.
All building setbacks and perimeter landscaping dimensions
are based on the abandonment of the four undeveloped
rights-of-way and easements that surround the north site.
Failure to abandon the rights-of-way and easements will
result in unacceptably reduced setbacks for some of the
2
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7091
Villas and inferior landscape widths and undisturbed areas
along the north and west perimeters.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The proposed development is divided into two sites; a south
site and a north site. The south site is the existing
Presbyterian Village containing multiple buildings. A row
of apartment buildings is located on the R-5 and 0-3 zoned
properties across Brookside to the east. A nursing home is
on 0-3 zoned property to the north. A C-3 zoned shopping
center is adjacent to the west. The north site is
undeveloped. A substantial, R-2 zoned floodway is adjacent
to the east. The nursing home and apartments are to the
south. MF -24 and MF -12 zoned apartments and condominiums
are adjacent to the north and west.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site,
all residents within 300 feet who could be identified and
the Sturbridge, Santa Fe Heights and Treasure Hills
Neighborhood Associations were notified of the proposal.
As of this writing, staff has received a few informational
inquiries only.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS:
1. Abandon all right-of-way or construct improvements.
2. Dedicate right-of-way and construct turnaround for
Brookside Drive (south).
3. Provide emergency access for fire trucks from Brookside
Drive (north) .
4. Establish minimum floor elevation on all buildings in
floodplain.
5. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property.
6. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities
are required.
7. Dedicate regulatory floodway to the City of Little Rock.
8. Existing topographical information at maximum 5 -foot
contour interval and the 100 base flood elevation will
be required.
9. A Grading Permit will be required per Sec. 29-186 (c)
and (d) .
10. A Grading Permit for Special Flood Hazard Area will be
required per Sec. 8-283.
3
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7091
11. A Development Permit for Flood Hazard Area will be
required per Sec. 8-283.
12. Contact the ADPC&E for approval prior to start of work.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer Main Relocation and Extension required
with easements to serve property. Capacity Contribution
Analysis is required. Contact Little Rock Wastewater
Utility for details.
Entergy: No Comments.
ARKLA: No Comments.
Southwestern Bell: No Comments.
Water: An acreage charge of $150 per acre and a development
fee based on the size of connection applies to connection
on the northern portion of this property in addition to
normal charges. The relocation of water facilities will be
at the expense of the developer. On-site fire protection
approved by the LRFD will be required.
Fire Department: Call Fire Department for placement of fire
hydrants and clearance of drive canopy.
County Planning: No Comments.
CATA: Project site is not located on a dedicated bus
route and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route.
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division:
This request is located in the West Little Rock Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Multi -family for this
property. The applicant has applied for a Planned
Residential Development for a retirement community. The
property is currently zoned 0-3 General Office and R-2
Single Family.
A land use plan amendment is not required.
4
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7091
city Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the
Reservoir Neighborhood Action Plan. The Transportation
Goal lists three objectives relevant to this case. The
three Transportation objectives include installation of a
left turn signal at Rodney Parham Road and Brookside Drive
to allow protected left turns, the synchronization of
stop lights on Reservoir and Rodney Parham Roads, and
limiting parking to one side on residential streets. The
Infrastructure Goal lists three objectives relevant to
this case. The three infrastructure objectives include
the installation of sidewalks in new developments, the
installation of streetlights in the neighborhood and the
improvement of water drainage throughout the neighborhood.
Landscape Issues:
Areas set aside for street and land use buffers meet
ordinance requirements, provided the proposed street
abandonments are approved. If they are not approved, then
additional street buffer widths will be required along the
northern and eastern site perimeters.
A 6 -foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its
face side directed outward or dense evergreen plantings,
will be required along all site perimeters abutting
residential properties where the corresponding streets are
abandoned.
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be
required.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (SEPTEMBER 13, 2001)
Robert Brown and Larry Mabry were present representing the
application. Staff asked for additional information on
signage and on the total number of beds/apartments
currently existing on the site. The remaining Planning
Staff Comments were divided into two areas; the south site
and the north site.
5
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.)
South Site
FILE NO.: Z-7091
Staff asked that the dumpster area be clearly labeled and
screening shown. Staff questioned the clearance under the
canopy at the entrance. The plan showed 103 parking
spaces, 8 less than ordinance requirement. Staff asked
that the required parking be shown or justification given
for the reduced standard.
■ North Site
J
Staff asked that the dumpster area be clearly labeled and
screening shown. Staff also questioned the clearance under
the entry canopy on this site. Staff commented that the
head -in parking spaces off of the main drive, across from
the Villas, could create congestion and asked that they be
removed. Mr. Brown and Mr. Mabry both stated that the
spaces were needed. After further discussion, staff agreed
to look again at the issue. It was noted that three of the
Villa units were within the 25 foot setback from the
floodway adjacent to the east. Staff noted that a portion
of the driveway/access easement crosses a corner of the
nursing home property. Mr. Brown responded that an
agreement would be made with the nursing home owners since
a portion of the nursing home's driveway actually crosses
Presbyterian Village's property as well.
Public Works Comments were discussed for the overall site.
Staff asked that a public turnaround be shown at the north
end of Brookside Drive, where the public right-of-way ends
coming off of Rodney Parham and that emergency access be
shown from the north leg of Brookside Drive, entering the
north perimeter of the north site. It was again noted that
the four rights-of-way surrounding the north site needed to
be abandoned. The hillside cut on the west perimeters of
the north site was briefly discussed.
The setback from the floodway and the head -in parking off
of the main driveway were discussed.
The Committee determined there were no other issues and
forwarded the item to the full Commission.
11
'October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7091
The applicant was instructed to provide a revised site plan
and responses to staff issues no later than Wednesday,
September 19, 2001.
H. ANALYSIS:
The applicant submitted a revised site plan and a letter
answering staff issues on September 19, 2001. Almost all
issues are addressed to staff's satisfaction. The number
of units to be replaced was indicated as outlined in the
proposal above. Dumpster screening has been shown to
conform to ordinance standards. Both canopies will have`'a
clearance of 10 feet. The Fire Department has approved the
plan, stating they do not need under the canopies to have
full access to the buildings. The required number of
parking spaces has been shown for the south site. An
unpaved, drivable surface emergency access has been shown
entering the site from Brookside Drive on the north. A "T"
turnaround has been shown at the terminus of the Brookside
Drive right-of-way entering the north site from Rodney
Parham. Slight modification will need to be made for
proper width (20 feet) and radius (10 feet) . The floodway
line has been redrawn based on an updated FIRM map. The
floodway has moved away from the site. There is no longer
a floodway setback issue. Only one ground -mounted sign is
proposed for the development. A 6 feet by 30 feet
architectural entry element (wall) will be placed on the
site at the intersection of Brookside and Rodney Parham.
Lettering will be placed on the wall. The actual area of
the sign lettering will be less the area of the structure.
No other signage is proposed other than small
directional/informational signs. Staff has discussed the
issue of head -in parking off of the driveway in front of
the Villas and is now willing to not oppose the parking as
shown. The applicant is confident that the number of
vehicles utilizing the driveway is such that allowing the
head -in spaces would not create a dangerous or,congested
situation.
To staff's knowledge, there are no major unresolved issues.
The proposed redevelopment and expansion of Presbyterian
Village is an appropriate use for this property and should
be compatible with uses and zoning in the area.
7
October 4, 2001
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 6 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z-7091
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends approval of the requested PRD subject to
compliance with the following conditions:
1. Compliance with requirements outlined in paragraphs D, E
and F of this report.
2.Abandonment of the platted but undeveloped rights-of-way
surrounding the north site, including any easements
within those rights-of-way.
Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow the `
terraced hillside cut on the western perimeter of the north
site subject to compliance with Ordinance requirements for
treatment and landscaping of such terraced cuts.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 4, 2001)
The applicant was present. There was one objector present who
did not turn in a card until after the item had been acted on.
Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval
subject to compliance with conditions outlined in the "Staff
Recommendation" above. Staff also recommended approval of the
terraced hillside cut as noted.
There was no further discussion.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as
recommended by staff. The vote was 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
8
October 7, 2004
ITEM NO.: 21 FILE NO.: Z-7091
NAME: Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD Time Extension
LOCATION: Located on the northwest corner of Rodney Parham Road and
Brookside Drive
DEVELOPER:
Presbyterian Village, Inc.
510 Borrkside Drive
Little Rock, AR 72205
ENGINEER:
Development Consultants, Inc.
2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220
Little Rock, AR 72212
AREA: 18.472 Acres
CURRENT ZONING:
ALLOWED USES:
NUMBER OF LOTS:
-M
2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
Nursing Home Facility and Elderly Housing
VARIAN CESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: A variance to allow an off premise sign.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 18,593 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on November 20,
2001, established the Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD. The retirement community
consisted of several buildings containing a variety of housing types for the elderly.
Building heights range from one to three stories. The requested PRD zoning approved
a major redevelopment and expansion of the facilities. The development plan was
proposed with two components; north site and south site.
The south site contained 8.09 acres. The facility contained 105 nursing care beds and
104 independent living apartment units. The site was to be razed with the exception of
37 independent living apartments. A new three-story, 95,000 square foot health care
building and 111 parking spaces were to be constructed on the site. The health care
building was to have 111 beds.
October 7, 2004
UBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 21 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7091
The north side of the site was undeveloped and contained 10.36 acres. Fifteen
independent living villas were to be constructed along the east side of the new
driveway. The units were to be a series of duplex and single-family homes. The site
was also to contain a 210,000 square foot independent living apartment building. The
buildings would vary in height from three to four stories. There were 190 parking
spaces proposed within the development.
A variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance was also approved to allow a fifty -foot
cut along the western perimeter of the north site. An undisturbed area, varying in width
from 25 feet to 160 feet was to remain along the western perimeter of the north site.
A. PROPOSAUREQUEST:
The applicant has requested approval by the Planning Commission of a time
extension for implementation of the improvements associated with the
Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD. The applicant has indicated economic
constraints have not allowed them to begin construction as anticipated. As a
result, the applicant, requests the Commission allow a two-year time extension of
the previously approved PRD.
The applicant is also requesting to be allowed to place an off premise sign on the
site to advertise the new residential units to be added to the northern site. The
sign is located on the "south site" lot at Rodney Parham and advertises the
independent living units on the "north site". The site is located within the
approved PRD.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site contains the existing Presbyterian Village located in multiple buildings.
A row of apartment buildings is located on Brookside to the east. A nursing
home is located to the north of the site. A commercial shopping center is located
to the west.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
The Sturbride, Santa Fe Heights and Treasure Hills Neighborhood Associations
were notified of the public hearing. As of this writing staff has not received any
comment from the indicated neighborhood associations.
H. ANALYSIS:
Although the previous ordinance allowed the Commission the ability to grant two,
one-year time extension; the ordinance adopted May 6, 2003, as per Section 36-
454 (e) " ... the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the
2
October 7, 2004
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 21 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7091
ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development
plan. The applicant may request and the planning commission may grant one
extension of time of not more than two -years."
The applicant wishes to retain the option of developing the site as originally
planned. If the extension is approved, the PRD will expire in November 2006
and the site may be subject to revocation action by the Commission.
E. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request for a two year time extension for the
proposed development and the request to allow the placement of an off -premise
sign located on the "south site" near Rodney Parham Road advertising the
coming of the new retirement homes located on the "north site".
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 7, 2004)
The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered
objectors present. Staff stated to their knowledge there are no outstanding issues
associated with the proposed request. Staff presented a recommendation of approval
of the request for a two year time extension for the proposed development and the
request to allow the placement of an off -premise sign located on the "south site" near
Rodney Parham Road advertising the coming of the new retirement homes located on
the "north site".
There was no further discussion of the item. The Chair entertained a motion to place
the item on the Consent Agenda for approval. The motion carried by a vote of 9 ayes,
0 noes and 2 absent.
3
October 7, 2004
ITEM NO.: 21 FILE NO.: Z-7091
NAME: Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD Time Extension
LOCATION: Located on the northwest corner of Rodney Parham Road and
Brookside Drive
DEVELOPER:
Presbyterian Village, Inc.
510 Borrkside Drive
Little Rock, AR 72205
ENGINEER:
Development Consultants, Inc.
2200 North Rodney Parham Road, Suite 220
Little Rock, AR 72212
AREA: 18.472 Acres
CURRENT ZONING:
ALLOWED USES:
NUMBER OF LOTS
--X
2 FT. NEW STREET: 0
Nursing Home Facility and Elderly Housing
VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: A variance to allow an off premise sign.
BACKGROUND:
Ordinance No. 18,593 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on November 20,
2001, established the Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD. The retirement community
consisted of several buildings containing a variety of housing types for the elderly.
Building heights range from one to three stories. The requested PRD zoning approved
a major redevelopment and expansion of the facilities. The development plan was
proposed with two components; north site and south site.
The south site contained 8.09 acres. The facility contained 105 nursing care beds and
104 independent living apartment units. The site was to be razed with the exception of
37 independent living apartments. A new three-story, 95,000 square foot health care
building and 111 parking spaces were to be constructed on the site. The health care
building was to have 111 beds.
October 7, 2004
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 21 Cont. FILE NO.: Z-7091
The north side of the site was undeveloped and contained 10.36 acres. Fifteen
independent living villas were to be constructed along the east side of the new
driveway. The units were to be a series of duplex and single-family homes. The site
was also to contain a 210,000 square foot independent living apartment building. The
buildings would vary in height from three to four stories. There were 190 parking
spaces proposed within the development.
A variance from the Land Alteration Ordinance was also approved to allow a fifty -foot
cut along the western perimeter of the north site. An undisturbed area, varying in width
from 25 feet to 160 feet was to remain along the western perimeter of the north site.
A. PROPOSAUREQUEST:
The applicant has requested approval by the Planning Commission of a time
extension for implementation of the improvements associated with the
Presbyterian Village Long -form PRD. The applicant ,has indicated economic
constraints have not allowed them to begin construction as anticipated. As a
result, the applicant, requests the Commission allow a two-year time extension of
the previously approved PRD.
The applicant is also requesting to be allowed to place an off premise sign on the
site to advertise the new residential units to be added to the northern site. The
sign is located on the south site lot at Rodney Parham and advertises the
independent living units on the "north site". The site is located within the
approved PRD.
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site contains the existing Presbyterian Village located in multiple buildings.
A row of apartment buildings is located on Brookside to the east. A nursing
home is located to the north of the site. A commercial shopping center is located
to the west.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
The Sturbride, Santa Fe Heights and Treasure Hills Neighborhood Associations
were notified of the public hearing. As of this writing staff has not received any
comment from the indicated neighborhood associations.
H. ANALYSIS:
Although the previous ordinance allowed the Commission the ability to grant two,
one-year time extension; the ordinance adopted May 6, 2003, as per Section 36-
454 (e) " ... the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the
October 7, 2004
SUBDVISION
ITEM NO.: 21(Cont.)_FILE NO.: Z-7091
ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development
plan. The applicant may request and the planning commission may grant one
extension of time of not more than two -years."
The applicant wishes to retain the option of developing the site as originally
planned. If the extension is approved, the PRD will expire in November 2006
and the site may be subject to revocation action by the Commission.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request for a two year time extension for the
proposed development and the request to allow the placement of an off -premise
sign located on the "south site" near Rodney Parham Road advertising the
coming of the new retirement homes located on the "north site".
3