The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZ-7062 ApplicationR2j 12 � � o R2 SIJ 12 C4 R2 IW R5 , GUARDIAN M koff C3 C3 C3 LU L C4 C3 U a _ z 12 15 c3-JCM 1 f LR5 RS RI R5 J L —� R5 R2 o R2 R2 a R2 0 C R2 D J u 19 o �w ® C3 u Lj Cl C3 03 Proposed Cell Tower Location 03 Oa C3 �r f R2 R2 R2 0 El o ] � ❑�� El d� ED[ oJ- Hyl o 1p R2 ❑ n R2 R2 Ll R Ll IlI ; Area Zoning Case # Z-7062 6521 Landcaster Road Cr: 20.02 TRS: T1NR12W30 PD: 13 Ward: 6 0 200 _ 400 Feet w Item # Extents Of Sprint PCS Lease Area Existing CMU Wall, \+ Proposed 150' Monopole 8' Chain Link Fences \ Proposed 8' Chain Link Fence New Retaining Wall 2 �SE 82`8" \ Existing 30" Gas ----, \ ` Easement Existing 40' Bower \ Easement Future Proposed Equipment Colocate \ Platform Area � Proposed Meter Proposed Double 8 -D 11 \ Center � 5wing Gates a o Extents Of Sprint 1105 1 F o Lease Area s N is lS) Q m m 61 LLI� W TR51 N12W30 CT 20.02 pp 13 WARD 6 Existing 40' Building Line 92.87 �- 17.11' Lancaster Road NEW MONOPOLE LOCATION Z-7062 6521 Lancaster Road 5prl 8' High Fence Retaininc Tower Elevation FF'Pl 30 NEW MONOPOLE LOCATION ITEM NO. Z-7062 6521 Lancaster Road NORTH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ORDINANCE NO. 18,513 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A WAIVER OF THE REQUIREMENT TO COMPLY AT THIS TIME WITH LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY LOCATED AT 6521 LANCASTER ROAD; TO SET CERTAIN CONDITIONS FOR THIS SITE; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors passed certain standards for landscaping and buffering of wireless communication facilities ("WCF") in Little Rock, Ark., Ordinance No. 18,173 (December 20, 1999), as may be amended ("LRO 18,173") which were to apply to all future applications for WCF permits, and WHEREAS, Crofton Communications, Inc., Sprint Spectrum L.P., has applied for a waiver of the landscaping requirements on all four sides of a new WCF with Support Structure (a monopole 150 feet in height with equipment cabinets) it will build on the site, and the screening requirements on the south and east sides of the leased area. WHEREAS, City staff supports the waivers as requested because the site is located on the rear of an asphalt parking lot behind an automobile repair business and all the surrounding properties are zoned commercial. WHEREAS, as set forth below the Board believes the request is appropriate under the current circumstances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: Section 1. The WCF at 6521 Lancaster Road is granted a waiver of the strict compliance with the landscaping provisions of LRO 18,183 for the following reasons: a. This site is zoned C-3 commercial and it is surrounded by property zoned 0-3, C-3 and C-4; b. A shrub and tree covered embankment already forms the eastern perimeter of the site; C. There is natural vegetation on the north which already provides some screening, d. The western perimeter of the leased area is visible from Lancaster 1 Road so the applicant will install a screening fence on the western 2 and northern perimeters of the site. 3 4 Therefore, the following waivers from strict compliance with LRO 18,173 under the 5 current circumstances is granted. 6 7 (1) Landscape requirements on all four sides of the site. 8 9 (2) Screening fence requirement on the east and south 10 perimeters of the site. 11 12 For these reasons, strict compliance with LRO 187,173 is waived until such 13 time as a major change in circumstances makes it necessary to impose landscaping 14 and screening requirements in order to meet the goals set forth in the ordinance. 15 16 Section 2. Findings. 17 (A) The Board declares that the general landscaping and screening provisions of LRO 18,173 18 should be met whenever possible, particularly in residential areas, but that strict compliance for 19 WCF tower permits granted prior to the effective date LRO 18,173 is not always appropriate under 20 existing circumstances. For example, it may not be possible to purchase or lease additional property 21 around the existing WCF site to meet the landscape and buffer requirements. Or, while the applicant 22 is willing to fulfill the City's stated preference of tower collocation, it is unable to do so and meet 23 landscaping requirements because a particular WCF tower is located in an area that, regardless of its 24 zoning classification, is really commercial or industrial in nature, and not only would landscaping be 25 of minimal value, it might in fact draw attention to the tower location and invite theft, vandalism, 26 and be in derogation of the goals and purposes of LRO 18,173. 27 (B) Under such circumstances, and others not set forth herein, it is appropriate to grant 28 waivers from the strict requirements of LRO 18,173, provided that if in the future a major change in 29 circumstances occurs, the City may modify the waivers granted to any subsection of this ordinance 30 in accordance with Subsection (C) below. 31 (C) For purposes of this ordinance, "a major change in circumstance" means that the 32 area within 200 feet of the boundaries of the WCF tower site has developed to the point that there is 33 a virtually unobstructed view of the tower from any adjoining residences located in an area zoned R- 34 1, R-2, or R-3, and 35 (1) (a) The City has received a complaint from the owner of 36 such a residence located within 200 feet of the tower 37 site that the site has no landscaping or screening in 38 place; and 39 [Page 2 of 2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PA 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 (b) The City has requested that the parties resolve the issue by agreeing to certain screening or landscaping requirements consistent with LRO 18,173, which can be granted administratively by the Director of Planning and Development, but no agreement has been reached. Once a year, for any matters impacted by this provision, the Board will receive a report from the Department of Planning and Development, to be made a part of the Board records on file with the City Clerk, which identifies the tower sites that have previously received waivers but, pursuant to this provision or any similar applicable provisions, has been the subject of modifications. In addition, these modifications shall be noted on the City's geographic information system map; OR (2) The tower site permittee has leased sufficient additional space to meet the landscaping setback, setback and screening requirements or LRO 18,173, subject to any right of review set forth in that ordinance, as may be amended. (D) Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (C) above, before any modification of a waiver is required, the City shall demonstrate that a major change in circumstances from the date of the original permit grant, or from the date of any waiver or deferral, has occurred. Section 3. Severability. In the event any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this ordinance is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the ordinance which shall remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional was not originally a part of the ordinance. Section 4. Repealer. All laws, ordinances, resolutions, or parts of the same, that are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. Section 5. Emergency. The City appreciates the fact that the federal government has taken steps to encourage the advancement of telecommunications technology, and understands that it is incumbent upon the City to encourage additional carriers to enter into the telecommunications field and to be able to have some certainty about the requirements and conditions for tower permits within the City. Such development is essential to protect the public health, safety and welfare. An emergency is, therefore, declared to exist, and this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage. [Page 3 of 3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 PASSED: JuIy 3, 2001 ATTEST: APPROVED: s/Nancy Wood s/Jim Dailey Nancy Wood, City Clerk Jim Dailey, Mayor APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: s /mss M. Carpenter Thomas M. Carpenter, City Attorney [Page 4 of 4] OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION JULY 3, 2001 AGENDA Subject I Action Required I Submitted By Crafton Communications, Inc. 40rdinance — Sprint Spectrum L. P. Resolution Wireless Communication Facility, with support structure, to be request to waive ordinance Approval requirements for screening Information Report and north perimeters of the lease area. and landscaping of a Wireless None RECOMMENDATION Communication Facility on all four sides and the screening requirements on only the south at 6521 Lancaster Road. and east sides. CITIZEN (Z-7062) PARTICIPATION BACKGROUND Crafton Communications, Inc. — Sprint Spectrum L.P. Cy Carney SYNOPSIS Crafton Communications, Inc. — Spring Spectrum L.P. is requesting a waiver of landscaping and screening for a new Wireless Communication Facility, with support structure, to be located on the C-3 zoned property at 6521 Lancaster Road. They do intend to install the required 8 foot screening fence on the west and north perimeters of the lease area. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Approval of an ordinance to waive the landscaping requirements on all four sides and the screening requirements on only the south and east sides. CITIZEN None PARTICIPATION BACKGROUND Crafton Communications, Inc. — Sprint Spectrum L.P. proposes to construct a new Wireless Communication Facility on the rear of the C-3 zoned property located at 6521 Lancaster Road. The site will contain a 150 foot tall monopole tower and the accompanying equipment cabinets. The lease area will be enclosed by an 8 foot tall wood and chain-link fence. The lease area consists of a portion of the asphalt -paved parking lot located behind the building that is occupied by Independent Foreign Car Service. Due to the nature and location of this particular site, the applicant is requesting a waiver of the landscaping BACKGROUND I requirement on all four perimeters of the lease area and of the CONTINUED screening requirement on the south and east perimeters. Staff is supportive of the waiver requests. The WCF is to be located on the rear portion of an asphalt parking lot behind an automobile repair business. All surrounding properties are zoned 0-3, C-3 and C-4. A shrub and tree covered embankment forms the eastern perimeter of the site. This embankment provides screening of the site from the apartments on the C-3 zoned property to the east. Some natural screening is provided on the north but not enough to completely screen the site. The western perimeter of the lease area is visible from Lancaster Road. Consequently, the screening fence should be installed on both the western and northern perimeters. The applicant has agreed to do SO. WCF.doc 2 1 09/22/00 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY (WCF) APPLICATION WCF CASE FILE NO.: Z- ADDRESS: USS, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Qka Tl+.ac�r � I o e _� Pc �-r eJio . I o t�+ a P1 CAPr Df 1-(4c{r 231 L-0. L el& q AV G RG a V71.90S Prc lLcs Tb -rw-E, C17N.1 OAF L1 U ZONING CLASSIFICATION: 0-5 ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL: YES NO PROPERTY LOCATED IN FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT: YES –)C_ NO ATTACHED: OR WITH SUPPORT STRUCTURE: Maximum I Setbacks: Height Front Rear I Sides Platted Building Line Allowed, WCF Tower r ' :2!;-' O j Proposed I's / 1.0g"5" .r-1 r 1 rr1-211Ais Allowed, Equipment Structure Proposed SECURITY FENCING HEIGHT: • b I LIGHTING: YES _)(__NO DOWNSHIELDED: (J DT QE Q V 1 R V q LANDSCAPE PLAN ATTACHED: ERP INFORMATION ATTACHED: COLLOCATION STATEMENT/AGREEMENT ATTACHED: ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARD INFORMATION: Ij & e LV 1 h) (" 11 1%) ~-" APPLICANT NAME: U _ L}�1 C A'C] 1l•1�RI ItiIT S�'GMU M L please print) APPLICANT ADDRESS: s D 12 ah -45D1+.] U 1 WE ST". 1-0 D. TY L�i4Z 1 �S�c3 APPLICANT PHONE NOA - q:5 1- v b q 3f FAX NO.: 6fC)-3 APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Date Received: gwy1 .2601 I— Any information not provided regarding Easement Clearance: rave enied easement or floodway/plain, which impacts the decision regarding this application is the Application Approved 1 responsibility of the applicant. NOTE: OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION. SUBMIT COPY OF THIS APPROVED APPLICATION AND ORIGINAL SIGNED SITE PLAN WITH COMMENTS: ofG dec. P �✓fS G J� ��iinDt� �Jj e r: l/ 'Avp K1'✓ f'5� �.' J'I DATE! V J 1-00 PLANNING OFFICIAL: Z,4-- X ,Y CRAFTON communications June 25, 2001 Mr. Dana Carney Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Re: LR13XCO82 SPRINT PCS— Spikes REVISED REQUEST 6521 Lancaster, Little Rock, AR Dear Mr. Carney: Please find enclosed a WCF application for our proposed site at 6521 Lancaster in Little Rock. I wanted address several issues regarding the placement and construction of this site. 1) Our site is located in close proximity to an existing Alltel monopole located at 3508 W. 65th. Sprint PCS applied for the right to collocate but the existing monopole and foundation failed structural analysis. There were not any other towers in the area that met Sprint PCS RF requirements. 2) Sprint PCS is requesting a waiver of the 6' landscape strip as required in Ordinance No. 18,173. The site is located in the rear of an auto lot and it is our belief that the existing use of the site, the use of adjoining properties and the topography make this a reasonable request. 3) Sprint PCS is also requesting a waiver of the 8' opaque fence on the South and East side of our compound, as required in Ordinance No. 18,173 for the reasons mentioned above. Sprint PCS proposes construction of an 8' chain link fence on these two sides. The North and West sides of the compound will conform to the ordinance. Please inform me of our scheduled hearing date regarding the waivers and direct any questions regarding the submitted plans to our A&E firm contact, Mark Holcomb (817) 347- 5916, all other questions are to be directed to my attention. Please feel free to call at 903-939-0043 should you have any questions and I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Vv` M. David Prejean Enclosures Mdp/ms 4545 Old Jacksonville Highway • Suite 100 • Tyler, Texas 75703 • Phone: 903.939.0043 • Fax: 903.581.7779 CRAFTON communications r Mr. Dana Carney Department of Planning & Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201-1334 Re: LR13XCO82 SPRINT PCS— Spikes 6521 Lancaster, Little Rock, AR Dear Mr. Carney: Please find enclosed a WCF application for our proposed site at 6521 Lancaster in Little Rock. I wanted address several issues regarding the placement and construction of this site. 1) Our site is located in close proximity to an existing Alltel monopole located at 3508 W. 65th. Sprint PCS applied for the right to collocate but the existing monopole and foundation failed structural analysis. There were not any other towers in the area that met Sprint PCS RF requirements. 2) Sprint PCS is requesting a waiver of the 6' landscape strip as required in Ordinance No. 18,173. The site is located in the rear of an auto lot and it is our belief that the existing use of the site, the use of adjoining properties and the topography make this a reasonable request. 3) Sprint PCS is also requesting a waiver of the 8' opaque fence as required in Ordinance No. 18,173 for the reasons mentioned above. Sprint PCS proposes construction of an 8' chain link fence surrounding the site. Please inform me of our scheduled hearing date regarding the waivers and direct any questions regarding the submitted plans to our A&E firm contact, Mark Holcomb (817) 347-5916, all other questions are to be directed to my attention. Please feel free to call at 903-939-0043 forward to working with you. Sincerely, �� M. David Prejean Enclosures Mdp/ms should you have any qu tionsAnd I look �A(�_ 4�= 4545 Old Jacksonville Highway • Suite 100 • Tyler, Texas 75703 • Phone: 903.939.0043 • Fax: 903.581.7779 `O'RAFTON �•. communications �� z WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY STATEMENT OF EFFECTIVE RADIATED POWER Site Number: Number LR13XCO82 Site Name: Jim Spikes 6521 Lancaster Little Rock, AR Type of Installation: Sprint Spectrum, L.P. - Monopole Tower The measurement of Effective Radiated Power (ERP) for this installation is 500 watts or less. The current FCC standards permit up to 1,000 watts ERP for this type of installation. Please reference the attached document regarding RF exposure safety and compliance for this cell site. This installation as designed meets the FCC standards. A.D id Prejean lv7i- Date 4545 Old Jacksonville Highway • Suite 100 9 Tyler, Texas 75703 • Phone: 903.939.0043 • Fax: 903.581.7779 Sprint PCS — RF Engineering - Regulatory Compliance 11880 College Blvd, Overland Park, KS 66210 Date: 5/29/01 *s ---SArlt Sprint PCS Ph(913)315-2639 Fax (913)315-2542 Subject: RF Exposure Safety and Compliance for Cell Sites The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate compliance with FCC standards in regards to the electromagnetic energy from Sprint PCS antennas, and to recommend safety procedures for the general public and occupational workers concerned with exposure issues related to RF Emissions. The FCC, in regulating electromagnetic energy, applies a modified version of the standards developed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) to include the NCRP standard for Specific Absorption Rate or SAR, for PCS bands. These standards, when converted over to the more familiar power density specification, set a maximum power density level for public areas at 1.00 mW/cm2 (milliwatts per square centimeter) for general population exposure and 5.00 mW/cm2 for occupational exposure. As a measure of safety, this level is set 50 times lower than levels the standards committees felt could potentially be harmful for constant exposure. Our antennas are designed to concentrate the majority of their signal power out of the front of the antenna in a very thin beam. These installations consist of three antennas each designed to cover 120 degrees for a total of 360 degrees of coverage. Signal strength coming from the back of an antenna and from positions well below an antenna is typically hundreds of times lower than the signal in the main beam at the front of the antenna. PCS technology uses very low power transmitters especially when compared with TV and Radio broadcasting which can be hundreds of thousands of times more powerful than a PCS station. Through software modeling techniques, we can calculate the power density from a Sprint PCS installation at a variety of locations around the proposed site. Sprint PCS evaluates all sites to determine the percent of exposure incurred by the general public and occupational exposure resulting from the operation of our antennas. This is an issue that we take very seriously with much effort and manpower going into maintaining NEPA compliant sites. In addition to this, regular audits are conducted to ensure accuracy and completeness. We have developed several proprietary software programs exclusively used to determine power density levels and to compute maximum exposure limits. It is also our policy that when a site is changed in any manner that would impact exposure levels, a new analysis is performed. All data is saved and available to the FCC upon request. Current FCC -adopted Exposure Limits In FCC 96-326, the FCC adopted new exposure guidelines. The guidelines are given in terms of MW/CMA 2 and the maximum limits are termed "Maximum Permissible Exposure" (MPE) for both occupational and general cases. Because these guidelines are based upon the same SAR limits as those in the IEEE/ANSI and NCRP guidelines, they also include the safety factors of 10 and 50 for occupational and general public scenarios respectively. The graph in Figure 1-1 shows the current FCC MPE guidelines. The two arrows indicate the cellular (-850 MHz) and PCS (--1900 MHz) frequencies. The exposure limits for PCS, expressed in terms of more readily determined "power density", are 1.0 and 5.0 mWlcmxfor general public and occupational cases, respectively. Figure 1-1: FCC Exposure Limits. Current FCC Ru/es/Regulations The current regulations are contained in CFR Title 47, Sections 1.1307 and 1.1310. A brief summary of the current regulation is as follows: s In general, all facilities, operations and transmitters regulated by the Commission must comply with the exposure limits put forth in the NEPA rules of Title 47, Part 1, Section 1.1307 and 1.1310. Applications to the Commission ... must contain a statement confirming compliance with the limits unless... categorically excluded. ■ Technical information showing the basis for this statement must be submitted to the Commission upon request. • In the case of multiple fixed transmitters, any action necessary to bring the facility into compliance is the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters contribute more than 5% of the exposure limit applicable to that transmitter. Exposure Modeling Using Spherical and Cylindrical Modeling, it is the policy of Sprint PCS to perform sufficient analysis on each site to assure that the above mentioned FCC Rules and Regulations are being met. Sprint PCS proprietary software is used to model RF exposure conditions on rooftops and towers and in any other areas that our antennas are used. Software modeling allows us to perform a worst case scenario for our antenna sites. This is accomplished by inputting the maximum power being transmitted into the antenna and determining what safe working distance is required to remain under the FCC limits established for General Public and Occupational Workers. Safety Procedures and Guidelines Under normal conditions, the general public and occupational worker are well protected. Sprint PCS provides a wide safety margin for areas around the antenna. Individuals working around or near the antennas should be informed that the radio frequency antennas exist on the site (this is indicated by signs located at the antennas). If for some reason the worker needs to approach within the designated area of the front of the antennas, the tower manager should be contacted as indicated on the sign posted near the antenna. For these rare situations the regional RF Manager can facilitate a decrease in power at the site. Health Risks and Issues Sprint PCS cell sites transmits non -ionizing emissions. Non -ionizing emissions occur from all known communication transmitters. Non -ionizing emission is non -cumulative, which means no re -occurring effects from the emission exist. Non -ionizing emission has the potential to increase molecular cell movement, which can cause an increase in body temperature. Currently, there have been no links to cancer from the effects of non -ionizing emissions. Ionizing emissions occurs at frequencies above UV light (2,420 GHz and higher). This type of emission can cause electrons to tear from their atoms, and create Ions. This effect causes permanent biological changes to molecular structure of cells, and DNA damage of the twisted strands. Ionizing emissions are cumulative, which means that the effects of the emissions will continue to damage good cells. A known ionizing emission that we typically confront is direct sunlight exposure. Summary It is Sprint PCS's policy to make sure that each site is within compliance to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) regulations in regards to radio frequency exposure limits to general and occupational workers. Maximum exposure levels occur in the front lobe of the antenna beam. The area in front of the antenna is normally inaccessible to the general or occupational worker(s). Exposure levels behind the antenna are much less than levels set in the standards, and typically require distances less than an inch for maximum exposure. Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields is of great concern to Sprint PCS and we evaluate all sites for compliance to current FCC rules and regulations. We are continually striving to improve the quality of our modeling techniques through continuous improvement of our software tools and training procedures. We recognize our role as an industry leader to place the health and welfare of the public and occupational workers in high regard, and will continue to do so through mandatory modeling and measurements as required. We determine the hazard that is present and inform both the general public and occupational workers through appropriate signage and inaccessible restriction areas. If you should have any questions, or you're in need of any further information regarding the RF emissions from this site, then you may contact me at the below listed number. Sincerely, David Kirk Manager National Regulatory Compliance RAFTON . communications N May 29, 2001 Wireless Telecommunication Facility Statement of Collocation Capability Re: LR13XCO82 SPRINT PCS- Spikes 6521 Lancaster, Little Rock, AR In compliance with the City of Little Rock ordinance article entitled "Wireless Communications Facilities", Sprint Spectrum L.P. hereby certifies that the 150' monopole proposed for this location will be structurally capable of supporting at least one additional carrier. Sprint Spectrum L.P. further certifies that it will welcome collocation agreement requests for this site from other carriers, competitors and non -competitors alike, and will accept such agreement at prevailing market terms and conditions. In addition, Sprint Spectrum, L.P. hereby certifies that search attempts were made to find sites in the specified need area in which the possibility of collocating on an existing tower and/or attaching to an existing structure would be possible. No such candidates were found. If you should have any questions please feel free to call me at (903) 939-0043. Sincerely, David Prejean Crafton Communications, Inc. 4545 Old Jacksonville Highway • Suite 100 • Tyler, Texas 75703 • Phone: 903.939.0043 • Fax: 903.581.7779 AFFIDAVIT I, „Ij m Spikes certify by my signature below that I hereby authorize Sprint Spectrum, L.P. to act as my agent regarding the zoning & permitting of the below described property. Property described as: Part of Tract #1 of Replat No. 1 of the Replat of the West par! of Tract 23, L.B. Leigh and R.C. Butlers Acres to the City of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, As described in the quick claim deed, book 91, page 38218 of Pulaski County Records. /ignaturye�MtleHolder Date Subscribed and sworn to me a Notary Public on this day of c3'`�GG N aryPublic My Commission Expires: SSLP NOTARY BLOCK: STATE OF TEXAS c .. - COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of '� `� t/ _ 2001, by Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of such corporation. (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) Frfsruss'"atlAssyFfMPlmfIFlsF� (�Rolvll ANGIE TARTEF�' Q!NOTARYPII U STATE OF TEW COMMISSION EXPIRES: MWItCH 2, 2005` F My commission expires: STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF (OFFICIAL NOTARY SIGNATURE) LIC—STATE OF 7. ANGIE TAR -Mo of cOyxISErON ExPIfIes; MARCH 2. 20 (PRINTED, TYPED NAME OF NOTARY) all The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19 -CM day of q"Ai c.0 , 2001, by (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) My commission expires: (OFAL NOTARY SIGNATURE)„ „ NOT RY PUBLIC—STATE OF (PRINTF , TYPED OR STAMPED NAME OF NOTARY)