Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6989 Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z-6989 NAME: Southwestern Bell Wireless - Tower Use Permit LOCATION: 10,301 Stagecoach Road OWNER/APPLICANT: Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems / Mark Stodola PROPOSAL: To obtain a tower use permit for a new wireless communication facility with a 150 foot monopole and a 20 x 12 foot equipment shelter on property zoned R-2, Single Family Residential. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. SITE LOCATION: This 5 acre site is located on the east side of Stagecoach Road at the intersection with Otter Creek Parkway. 2. COMPATIBILITY WITH NEIGHBORHOOD: The proposed site is zoned R-2, Single Family Residential and is surrounded by R-2 zoning except for the first few hundred feet of the south property line, which has abutting C-3, General Commercial, and OS, Open Space zoning. The eastern portion of the property upon which the site is proposed to be located is in a flood way. Two-thirds of the property lies in a flood plane. The flood way and flood plane also cross the adjoining properties on either side to varying degrees. No development can occur in the flood way. Also the property along the south side of this site which is currently zoned R-2 and not in the flood way, is not likely to ever develop residentially. The portion that can be developed is more likely to be rezoned commercial or office as property on the other corners of this major intersection and property fronting on Stagecoach have done. There is not much area between the existing commercial property and the FILE NO.: Z-6989 (Cont.) flood way of Fourche Creek. Therefore, Staff believes this is a good location for a WCF tower that would not have an adverse impact on the surrounding area. The Otter Creek Neighborhood Association and Southwest Little Rock United for Progress, all property owners within 200 feet, and all residents within 300 feet that could be identified, were notified of the public hearing. 3. ON SITE DRIVES AND PARKING: There are two access drives for the parent property which serve the primary uses of a maintenance yard and storage facility for Southwester Bell Mobile Systems. There is plenty of space for parking maintenance vehicles to service the proposed WCF. 4. SCREENING AND BUFFERS: WCFs are required to have a six foot wide landscape strip and eight foot tall opaque wood fence around the entire WCF site except for an access point. The applicant has requested a waiver to these requirements due to the location of the site and nature of the surrounding area. 5. PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: a.Stagecoach Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a minor arterial. A dedication of right-of- way 45 feet from centerline will be required. b.Dedicate regulatory floodway to the City of Little Rock. c. Property frontage needs to have the sidewalks and ramps brought up to the current ADA standards. d. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. 6. UTILITY, FIRE DEPT. AND CATA COMMENTS: Water: No objection. Wastewater: Service not required for this project. 2 FILE NO.: Z-6989 (Cont.) Southwestern Bell: They are the applicant. ARKLA: No comments received. Entergy: No comments received. Fire Department: Approved as submitted. CATA: No comments requested. 7. STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant has requested a Tower Use Permit to locate a new wireless communication facility (WCF)including a 150 foot monopole and a 20 x 12 foot equipment shelter. Siting requirements are exceeded to the north, east and west, but the distance of the tower to the south property line which abuts residential zoning is less than the height of the highest point on the proposed WCF. Therefore, a Tower Use Permit is required. Staff believes this is a good location for a WCF since it is on existing Southwestern Bell property and is backed up against a flood way which would preclude other development close by that may be opposed to the WCF. The surrounding property is heavily treed to help naturally screen the site. WCFs are inevitable in this area and this location would be one that would have less direct impact on abutting property because of the reasons described above in paragraph 2. Staff believes this is a reasonable use of this site and because of the nature of the surrounding properties, its negative impact would be minimized. The applicant is also asking for a waiver of the landscaping and wood screening fence requirements for this site. That request would have to go to the Board of Directors for final approval. The applicant feels this waiver would be justified because of the distance from Stagecoach Road (679 feet), the natural screening that already exists, and the nature of the surrounding area (floodway 60 feet to the east). The site would be within an existing chainlink fenced compound that is always locked. So the applicant feels an additional wood screening fence would not be needed for security, 3 FILE NO.: Z-6989 (Cont.) and that it would add no screening value because of the reasons stated above. Staff agrees with the applicant's justification and recommends the Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation on to the Board of Directors to waive the landscaping and screening requirements. 8. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to compliance with the following conditions: a. Comply with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances. b. Comply with Public Works Comments. c. Only lighting allowed is that required by State or Federal law, and that required for safety and security of equipment. Even that must be down shielded and kept within the boundaries of the site. d. No signs, logos, decals, symbols or messages may be displayed on the site except for a small message containing provider identification and emergency telephone numbers. Staff also recommends approval of landscaping and screening for this request would have to go on to the Planning Commission recommendation decision. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENTS: the waiver for WCF. The waiver City Board with a for a final (APRIL 12, 2001) Mark Stodola was present representing the application. Staff gave a brief description of the proposal and briefly reviewed the comments provided to the applicant. Staff explained why this proposal required a Tower Use Permit and discussed the location of the proposed site in relation to the flood way. Staff asked the applicant to show on the site plan exactly where the flood way and flood plane boundaries were. The issue of a higher tower was also mentioned as reasonable for this location because of its location and to reduce future separate towers in the area. The applicant said they would consider a higher tower. The 4 FILE NO.: Z-6989 (Cont. applicant also stated their desire to obtain a waiver of the landscaping and wood screening fence. Staff reminded the applicant to provide notification by certified mail to property owners within 200 feet no later than April 18, 2001, and that the applicant must provide postmarked certified outgoing receipts, the abstract list of property owners, and the original notification letter with affidavit completed, to Staff no later than six days prior to the public hearing. There being no further issues, proposal and forwarded the item final action. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: the Committee accepted the to the full Commission for (MAY 3, 2001) Mark Stodola was present representing the application. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation for approval subject to compliance with the conditions listed under "Staff Recommendation," paragraph 8 above. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as submitted to include staff comments and recommendations. The vote was 10 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 5