Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6980-A Staff AnalysisAPRIL 24, 2006 ITEM NO.: 3 File No.: Owner: Applicant: Address: Description: Zoned: Z -6980-A Nancy Bartlett, Bartlett Family Trust Chuck Hamilton 5036 West Crestwood Lot 30, Prospect Terrace Addition R-2 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the building line provisions of Section 31-12 and the area provisions of Section 36-254 to allow an addition with reduced front and side setbacks, and which crosses a platted building line. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: No Comments. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property at 5036 West Crestwood Drive is occupied by a one- story brick and rock single family residence which is currently being remodeled. There is a circular driveway from West Crestwood Drive and a single car driveway at the southwest corner of the property. There is a 30 foot platted building line along the north and west street frontages. As part of the remodeling project, the applicant proposes to construct a seven (7) foot wide covered porch on the front of the house and a single car carport at the southwest corner of the structure, as noted on the attached site plan. APRIL 24, 2006 ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T. The northwest corner of the proposed porch will be located 17 feet back from the front (west) property line, with the southwest corner of the proposed carport structure being 18 feet back from the front property line. The carport will be located 4 feet to 11 feet back from the south side property line. The proposed porch and carport construction will also cross the 30 foot platted front building line. Section 36-254(d)(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum front setback of 25 feet. Section 36-254(d)(2) requires a minimum side setback of eight (8) feet. Section 31-12(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that encroachments across platted building lines be reviewed and approved by the Board of Adjustment. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow the proposed porch and carport additions with reduced front and side setbacks, and to cross the front platted building line. Staff is supportive of the requested variances. Staff feels the request is reasonable. The proposed additions will not be out of character with other building additions which have been made in this neighborhood over the past few years. Given the curvature of West Crestwood Drive and the fact that the proposed structures are not enclosed, they should have no negative visual impact on the adjacent properties. Additionally, staff believes adequate separation will exist between the proposed carport structure and the residence immediately to the south. Staff feels the proposed additions will have no adverse impact on the general area. If the Board approves the building line variance, the applicant will have to complete a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the platted front building line for the proposed porch and carport additions. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the circuit Clerk's office to determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances, associated with the proposed additions, subject to the following conditions. 1. Completion of a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the front platted building line as approved by the Board. 2. The porch structure must remain unenclosed on the north, south and west sides. 3. The carport structure must remain unenclosed on the south, east and west sides. 4. The porch and carport additions must be constructed to match the existing principal structure. 2 APRIL 24, 2006 ITEM NO.: 3 (CON'T. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (APRIL 24, 2006) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 nays and 2 absent. 3