Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6945 Staff AnalysisNovember 27, 2000 Item No.: 5 File No.: Z-6945 Owner: Casonia Vinson Address: #1 Deer Meadow Cove Description: Lot 14, Block 1, Deer Meadow Zoned• R-2 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the fence height provisions of Section 36-156 to permit a 6 foot tall privacy fence within the street side yard setback. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Pro2erty: Single Family Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: No issues. B. Staff Analysis: The R-2 zoned property located at #1 Deer Meadow Cove is occupied by a one-story, brick and frame, single family residence. The occupant has recently erected a 6 foot tall privacy fence enclosing the street side and rear yard. The fence extends past the building line to the property line adjacent to Deer Meadow Drive. The code limits the height of fences erected within setbacks adjacent to streets to 4 feet. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. The fence is located 19± feet from the curb of Deer Meadow Drive which, at this point, is a divided street with a median. The street has an` -80 foot right-of-way. The broad right-of-way and the traffic lanes being divided by the median reduce the November 27, 2000 Item No.: 5 (Cont. potential of a sight -distance hazard. This property, as with several others on Deer Meadow Drive, had a chain-link fence that actually extended into the right-of-way. That portion of the chain-link fence has been removed and the new, privacy fence is totally within the property lines. The fence has been constructed in "good neighbor" fashion, with the finished side facing outward. During the site visit, staff becomes aware of a new storage building that had been placed between the house and Deer Meadow Drive, behind the new privacy fence. The applicant was advised that the structure did not meet required setbacks. The applicant has stated that she will relocate the structure to an appropriate location on her property. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the fence height variance, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (NOVEMBER 27, 2000) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. 2