Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6921-B Staff AnalysisJune 25, 2001 Item No.: 5 File No. Z -6921-A Owner: System Capital Real Property Corporation Address: 8710 Fourche Dam Pike Description: Lot 2B of the replat of Lot 2, River Subdivision Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: A variance is requested from the wall sign provisions as defined in Section 36-530. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Restaurant Proposed Use of Proper : Restaurant Staff Report : A. Public Works Issues: No issues related to this sign variance. B. Landscape Review: A new McDonald's Restaurant has recently been constructed on the C-3 zoned property at 8710 Fourche Dam Pike. Mansard Signs were mounted on structure. The signs consist of individual letters attached by supports to the mansards. The signs are located 18 V" from the face of the mansard at the bottom and 3110 '411 from the face of the mansard at the top. The code definition of wall signs, which includes mansard signs, states the signs must not extend more than 18" from the wall/mansard of the building. The applicant states the signs must be located as they are to allow access to illuminated roof beams on the mansard. Moving the signs back closer to the face of the mansard would create a June 25, 2001 Item No.: 5 (Cont. hardship in changing the light bulbs within the illuminated roof beams. Staff is uncomfortable supporting the requested variance. While the illuminated roof beams may very well be part of McDonald's trademark, it has not been past City policy to permit such signs to "stick-up" above and away from mansard roofs. In other instances, the sign owner has been required to create a "box" behind the lettering so that the sign is mounted flush or against a wall/mansard surface. While acknowledging that taking such action in this particular case would be a hardship, staff is concerned that allowing the signs could lead to similar requests. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval of the requested variance. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (JUNE 25, 2001) Andy Francis, Lloyd Stokes and Roland Yates were present representing the application. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of denial. Andy Francis addressed the Board. He described the issue and presented photographs of the signs. Roland Yates, construction manager for McDonald's, stated the sign and building design were standard for McDonald's. He stated the signs cannot be pulled back toward the mansard due to the illuminated light beams, Mr. Yates stated all permits were obtained, there were no issues raised when the plans were reviewed, there are similar signs at all other McDonald's in Little Rock and no other City requires such a variance. Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff, responded that sign permits are reviewed separate from building construction drawings and the sign drawings did not show the signs to stick -out from the mansard. Mr. Carney stated he had no response regarding the other McDonald's in Little Rock but he would be glad to look into the other sites. Mr. Carney reminded the Board that each City had its own regulations and ordinances and it did not matter if "no other City required such a variance." 2 June 25, 2001 Item No.: 5 (Cont.) Mr. Francis stated the signs were not garish and out of the ordinary. He stated the signs would not harm any other properties or businesses in the area. In response to a question from Fred Gray, Mr. Carney explained the regulations related to wall/mansard signs. After a brief discussion, a motion was made to approve the variance to allow the two mansard signs, as constructed. The motion was approved by a vote of 3 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 3