Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-6921 Staff AnalysisOctober 30, 2000 Item No.: 2 File No.: Z-6921 Owner: Koon Properties LLC Address: 7615 Fluid Drive Description• Lot 2C, River Subdivision Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area regulations of Section 36-301 and the building line provisions of Section 31-12. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Pro ert : Unfinished motel Proposed Use of Property: Motel Staff Report: A. Public Works Issues: 1.Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210 or Ordinance 18,031. Maximum driveway width at property line is 36'. 2. Stormwater detention ordinance applies to this property. 3. Easements for proposed stormwater detention facilities are required. 4. Provide design of street conforming to "MSP" (Master Street Plan). Cqnstruct one-half street improvement to these streets including 5 -foot sidewalks with planned development (Fluid Drive sidewalks and Fourche Dam Pike widening) . 5. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of work. 6. Proposed concrete walk around pool should not extend into drainage easement; relocate. B. Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property located at 7615 Fluid Drive is occupied by a two-story motel which is currently under October 30, 2000 Item No.: 2 (Cont. construction. A previous owner began the project but abandoned it with the building only partially completed. A new owner has restarted the development and is in the process of finishing the building. It was discovered by the new owner that a portion of the drive-through canopy at the entrance was built over a platted 25 foot building line resulting in a front yard setback of 22 feet. The new owner would also like to install a swimming pool. The pool is proposed to also be built across the Fluid Drive perimeter building line and the I-440 access road building line. The pool is proposed to have a front yard setback of 17 feet. A 25 foot front yard setback is required in the C-3 zone. Staff is supportive of the requested variances for the drive-through canopy. The encroachment involves only a small corner of the canopy. The canopy is unenclosed. Allowing this minor, corner intrusion to remain will have no impact on adjacent properties or on traffic in the street. The canopy edge is actually located 33± feet from the curb of Fluid Drive. Fluid Drive is not a heavily traveled street. It dead -ends approximately 1,000 feet west of this site. Staff is also supportive of the relatively minor variance for the pool itself, however there are problems associated with the 8 foot wide concrete walk which wraps around the pool. The variance for the pool is only for a corner intrusion and should have no impact on neighboring properties or traffic on Fluid Drive. The 8 foot concrete walk extends into a drainage easement. There are stormwater detention issues which are affected by allowing the walk to be built in this area. Staff would prefer to see the pool rotated 900 and moved closer to the I-440 Access Road. Allowing a greater portion of the pool to be built across the platted building line adjacent to the access ramp will have no affect on adjacent properties or entrance ramp traffic. This would allow the pool to remain near the office, which is desired by the applicant, and would remove the concrete walk out of the drainage easement, which is desired by staff. If the Board approves the building line variances for the canopy and pool, the applicant will have to do a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the building line(s) as approved by the Board. The applicant should review the filing procedure with the Circuit Clerk's office to 2 October 30, 2000 Item No.: 2 (Cont. determine if the replat requires a revised Bill of Assurance. C. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback and building line variances for the canopy subject to a one -lot replat reflecting the change in the building line as approved by the Board. Staff does not support the variances for the pool, as filed. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (OCTOBER 30, 2000) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and informed the Board that the applicant had relocated the pool as proposed by staff. As such, staff recommended approval of the requested building line and setback variances subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with Public Works comments including any variance or waiver of those requirements as may be granted by the Director of Public Works or the Board of Directors. 2. A one lot replat reflecting the change in the building lines for the canopy and pool. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff. The vote was 5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent. 3